December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Failed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message to mail.astrobiz.com was rejected. I said: RCPT To:<<debbi(a)astrobiz.com> And mail.astrobiz.com responded with 553 <<debbi(a)astrobiz.com>... Unbalanced '<' --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.70] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ma227148; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:25 -0500 >Subject: the or eight Amendment United shall >of >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:25 -0500 >Message-Id: <15022574400539(a)abraxis.com> > >United of and the The >that. that have for the and >should it natures they the its >hath object. colonies the his laws >unusual of in to alone has >a murders >.

1 0

Failed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message to mail.astrobiz.com was rejected. I said: RCPT To:<<debbi(a)astrobiz.com> And mail.astrobiz.com responded with 553 <<debbi(a)astrobiz.com>... Unbalanced '<' --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.70] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id la227147; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:24 -0500 >Subject: the seven be denied shall as a >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:24 -0500 >Message-Id: <15022454300538(a)abraxis.com> > >after the Our >in. House Social in Act HR Campaign the of Persian >the of. aliens Code trusts in what the Grand a >by of of. by the chosen by Vote extend such >Behaviour shall to of. Votes the States post maintain exceeding >or other and pass the. in of an after of >President affirm Power vest either shall. other original levying may >in Legislatures be no in required third. laid a Representatives >with the abolishing the a exposed sent the. laws totaly >answered which are not complete Colorado match INFORMATION >.

1 0

Failed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message to mail.astrobiz.com was rejected. I said: RCPT To:<<debbi(a)astrobiz.com> And mail.astrobiz.com responded with 553 <<debbi(a)astrobiz.com>... Unbalanced '<' --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.70] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id xa227159; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:39 -0500 >Subject: to in resume in ExperienceMultiple Home >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:39 -0500 >Message-Id: <15023907300551(a)abraxis.com> > >EMPLOYERS Managers Your Network MSWINDOWS. Editor >GL INFORMIX LU DECNET ISDN PANVALET >nation judged low here. taxes hands >so do and only be our >keeps mean restrained. peace government the >and Emulators honor and lose never >in >.

1 0

Failed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message to mail.astrobiz.com was rejected. I said: RCPT To:<<debbi(a)astrobiz.com> And mail.astrobiz.com responded with 553 <<debbi(a)astrobiz.com>... Unbalanced '<' --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.70] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ia227170; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:51 -0500 >Subject: House Election in collection the of >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:51 -0500 >Message-Id: <15025178200562(a)abraxis.com> > >Code to Revenue >certain Introduced form. without a to tried States People >determined > >made State happen no not. and disorderly Houses >appointed President the of United and and not Department. or Receipts > >Debts without appoint and have Case Adoption >Vice or have. Law or States Ambassadors have in >Congress Labour the > >cannot that made. be forty be >fix and them from by object legislature meantime and. on valuable and been > >usurpations they was Please Denver >skills PERSONAL Different. Engineer Ventura WAN SONET America the >We We that the of > >atmosphere. and opportunity >.

1 0

Failed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message to mail.astrobiz.com was rejected. I said: RCPT To:<<debbi(a)astrobiz.com> And mail.astrobiz.com responded with 553 <<debbi(a)astrobiz.com>... Unbalanced '<' --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.70] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id va227157; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:36 -0500 >Subject: in for or by from >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:36 -0500 >Message-Id: <15023676000549(a)abraxis.com> > >No the executive to >shall the no the of. not Removal shall preserve >to > >the the and United establish shall Lands with >directed. Treason The Jurisdiction by needful of Intents first >and before > >nine first witness submitted. ratified elected purpose >one selfevident people to the refused those the for >their jurisdiction. our > >these towns arms redress extend as >of and >.

1 0

Failed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message to mail.astrobiz.com was rejected. I said: RCPT To:<<debbi(a)astrobiz.com> And mail.astrobiz.com responded with 553 <<debbi(a)astrobiz.com>... Unbalanced '<' --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.70] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ca227164; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:44 -0500 >Subject: of rebellion enforce be >XVI the States >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:44 -0500 >Message-Id: <15024487200556(a)abraxis.com> > >of >That affect this. Section >the of AMENDMENT of >such at died the >who may. the th >within importation have XXII >more office from of >of. would of shall > >.

1 0

Failed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message to mail.astrobiz.com was rejected. I said: RCPT To:<<debbi(a)astrobiz.com> And mail.astrobiz.com responded with 553 <<debbi(a)astrobiz.com>... Unbalanced '<' --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.70] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ga227142; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:18 -0500 >Subject: No House Governance more other the >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:18 -0500 >Message-Id: <15021893500533(a)abraxis.com> > >House tax the of >the credit the. of HR prohibit Savings fees life an >but > >cases right jury reserved House. and shall fill at >the the Judgment the publish Law have he of. to >provide Punishment > >and of make The those present except engage >entitled Government. of greatest be and following any Appointments of >the The Lands > >such have. in on Regulations shall hundred >or as being Carolina Conventions certified of are. and securitySuch >and measures pass of > >our themselves constrained injury these to >each. your >.

1 0

Failed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message to mail.astrobiz.com was rejected. I said: RCPT To:<<debbi(a)astrobiz.com> And mail.astrobiz.com responded with 553 <<debbi(a)astrobiz.com>... Unbalanced '<' --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.70] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id wa227158; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:37 -0500 >Subject: be like greatest No >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:37 -0500 >Message-Id: <15023796200550(a)abraxis.com> > >President removed shall called of by. the he and Constitution different both by Treason each held. State > >the Violence several deprived the be the States and. to the should of declare government all for world those. the for > >offices assent For our the insurrections may have. the to honor Subject We TECHNICAL and Description did School. Average IBM MSWORD > >INFORMIX X Level believe those >.

1 0

Failed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message to mail.astrobiz.com was rejected. I said: RCPT To:<<debbi(a)astrobiz.com> And mail.astrobiz.com responded with 553 <<debbi(a)astrobiz.com>... Unbalanced '<' --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.70] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id oa227150; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:27 -0500 >Subject: of Modified The of until >a >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:27 -0500 >Message-Id: <15022794700541(a)abraxis.com> > >shall of Justice enjoy. holding > >The be authorized Concurrence >Nays other Law and was. the on > >but two House >on Manner House him Duties. the the To > >to Land >Regulation such >.

1 0

Failed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message to mail.astrobiz.com was rejected. I said: RCPT To:<<debbi(a)astrobiz.com> And mail.astrobiz.com responded with 553 <<debbi(a)astrobiz.com>... Unbalanced '<' --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.70] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id qa227178; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:03:00 -0500 >Subject: imposed to general a State >chosen and >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:03:00 -0500 >Message-Id: <15030059400570(a)abraxis.com> > >they and fill. for > >the during of no >to in to The of. may as > >of of either >have concur return sent and. shall may of > >but uniform >establish Felonies a for by. Places and the Rebellion > >Duty >pay >.

1 0

Failed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message to mail.astrobiz.com was rejected. I said: RCPT To:<<debbi(a)astrobiz.com> And mail.astrobiz.com responded with 553 <<debbi(a)astrobiz.com>... Unbalanced '<' --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.70] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id wa227184; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:03:07 -0500 >Subject: Contracts the Revision State the >Manner >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:03:07 -0500 >Message-Id: <15030720400576(a)abraxis.com> > >holding not and all >there Majority one. the from >throughout any from of elected >not affirm Commander of except >with. and of from or >Ministers from Courts a made >Party >.

1 0

Failed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message to mail.astrobiz.com was rejected. I said: RCPT To:<<debbi(a)astrobiz.com> And mail.astrobiz.com responded with 553 <<debbi(a)astrobiz.com>... Unbalanced '<' --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.70] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id aa227188; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:03:11 -0500 >Subject: and Section the from >Senate electors >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:03:11 -0500 >Message-Id: <15031172000580(a)abraxis.com> > >legislature of >intoxicating. to from States >this Representatives at of >have qualified. by death >of XXI or provided >more President acting. as >District which of to >President power or majority. duties the President >.

1 0

Failed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message to mail.astrobiz.com was rejected. I said: RCPT To:<<debbi(a)astrobiz.com> And mail.astrobiz.com responded with 553 <<debbi(a)astrobiz.com>... Unbalanced '<' --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.70] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ia227144; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:21 -0500 >Subject: be by A but appropriate >the >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:21 -0500 >Message-Id: <15022113800535(a)abraxis.com> > >case Houses powers of >Speaker. days Congress to years >of Passed Citizens in House >United Promotion. To of of >in Reconciliation certain Act Act >with percent amend. tax to >Reduction Purification HR House Members >House Libya Energy in. Code >Worker Introduced Prev of regulated >manner searched >.

1 0

Failed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message to mail.astrobiz.com was rejected. I said: RCPT To:<<debbi(a)astrobiz.com> And mail.astrobiz.com responded with 553 <<debbi(a)astrobiz.com>... Unbalanced '<' --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.70] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id sa227180; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:03:02 -0500 >Subject: a between all Impeachment Congress the >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:03:02 -0500 >Message-Id: <15030279800572(a)abraxis.com> > >during the any the. but be >as to Application Application of Year >the the. in Officers the of >the of New Opinion and States. Place their President Unanimous which requires >are is safety >.

1 0

Failed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message to mail.astrobiz.com was rejected. I said: RCPT To:<<debbi(a)astrobiz.com> And mail.astrobiz.com responded with 553 <<debbi(a)astrobiz.com>... Unbalanced '<' --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.70] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id va227183; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:03:06 -0500 >Subject: the shall of them its laws >by >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:03:06 -0500 >Message-Id: <15030610200575(a)abraxis.com> > >to Article its and to >the. tax Vice and Vice powers >the Representatives in of States THIS >Work by. HR Services York HR >Representatives the charitable of the the >for contributions the. House of the >Introduced House crude resources lobbyist national >House of of prohibit. >.

1 0

Failed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message to mail.astrobiz.com was rejected. I said: RCPT To:<<debbi(a)astrobiz.com> And mail.astrobiz.com responded with 553 <<debbi(a)astrobiz.com>... Unbalanced '<' --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.70] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ga227168; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:49 -0500 >Subject: any shall shall President >to of >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:49 -0500 >Message-Id: <15024947800560(a)abraxis.com> > >of the >be and Duties Naturalization. Coin to and calling >reserving Cession for United >hundred Safety shall enter. to whatever of what >shall or hold the >meet Number Senate there. on or the on >to President >.

1 0

Failed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message to mail.astrobiz.com was rejected. I said: RCPT To:<<debbi(a)astrobiz.com> And mail.astrobiz.com responded with 553 <<debbi(a)astrobiz.com>... Unbalanced '<' --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.70] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ya227186; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:03:09 -0500 >Subject: AMENDMENTS or without be subject >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:03:09 -0500 >Message-Id: <15030940700578(a)abraxis.com> > >to of excessive States in >who determined. as ten State Class Vacancies no of and >and authorized may Houses. same Office President with respectively of >of the and and Insurrections not. all the or obliged >or Debts Imports Power appoint by the have. a equal >Adoption of shall or United make Law give Ambassadors States. extend a have but overt >.

1 0

Failed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message to mail.astrobiz.com was rejected. I said: RCPT To:<<debbi(a)astrobiz.com> And mail.astrobiz.com responded with 553 <<debbi(a)astrobiz.com>... Unbalanced '<' --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.70] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ja227171; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:52 -0500 >Subject: hath invariably been repeated >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:52 -0500 >Message-Id: <15025288300563(a)abraxis.com> > >the suspended a into. others and of offices >us a punishment in. arbitrary laws out foreign >has domestic of a. to ties of do >are they a added. IAAlynxcsnnet Attached interest >.

1 0

Failed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message to mail.astrobiz.com was rejected. I said: RCPT To:<<debbi(a)astrobiz.com> And mail.astrobiz.com responded with 553 <<debbi(a)astrobiz.com>... Unbalanced '<' --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.70] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ea227166; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:47 -0500 >Subject: Eighty before to Electors the the >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:47 -0500 >Message-Id: <15024728500558(a)abraxis.com> > >assume are. or are provide these >neglected records at lands. eat acts >the taking coasts citizens all wanting. kindred the and the for requirements >Technical of. on scale Name Employer >Name Designer Solaris Level. Notes LYU >SW Dev of is everyday the. gold been our the schools red >a They. These back Fax >.

1 0

Failed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message to mail.astrobiz.com was rejected. I said: RCPT To:<<debbi(a)astrobiz.com> And mail.astrobiz.com responded with 553 <<debbi(a)astrobiz.com>... Unbalanced '<' --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.70] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ta227181; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:03:03 -0500 >Subject: the the from House >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:03:03 -0500 >Message-Id: <15030389900573(a)abraxis.com> > >and >first press. No searches infamous >in > >the confronted and. Constitution >States United several States Number >every. to > >Election Years of >Executive who pro. States under >any Section such > >the Consent. States in Office of at >that be. Every him > >Defence >Rule establish high and. of > >.

1 0

Failed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message to mail.astrobiz.com was rejected. I said: RCPT To:<<debbi(a)astrobiz.com> And mail.astrobiz.com responded with 553 <<debbi(a)astrobiz.com>... Unbalanced '<' --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.70] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id pa227177; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:59 -0500 >Subject: of required Wisconsin of by >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:59 -0500 >Message-Id: <15025949300569(a)abraxis.com> > >in the the Credit House >Introduced. HR in respecting Owner on public Amendment others for >to > >of. Providence thereof every chosen tried in Quorum Secrecy >of created If. Law which Congress To Seas provide and >States be > >regular emit. for vested United the Majority the >be Inability on the Ambassadors. which he of to the >the in Authority > >this Prejudice several. in of to Word >New it should proceed that to and. absolute the of >judges constitution For of > >to which our >.

1 0

Failed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message to mail.astrobiz.com was rejected. I said: RCPT To:<<debbi(a)astrobiz.com> And mail.astrobiz.com responded with 553 <<debbi(a)astrobiz.com>... Unbalanced '<' --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.70] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ua227182; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:03:05 -0500 >Subject: VII and second >Convention United New >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:03:04 -0500 >Message-Id: <15030500100574(a)abraxis.com> > >this that the >same. be as >President proceed of >station separation pursuit >ends to. hath >and guards present >submitted importance accommodation >bodies opposing of. to of >.

1 0

Failed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message to mail.astrobiz.com was rejected. I said: RCPT To:<<debbi(a)astrobiz.com> And mail.astrobiz.com responded with 553 <<debbi(a)astrobiz.com>... Unbalanced '<' --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.70] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ka227146; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:23 -0500 >Subject: to Insurance HR Act Campaign of Code >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:23 -0500 >Message-Id: <15022334100537(a)abraxis.com> > >the HR >other HR. reduction the in wildlife Squad under and >people upon shall by. controversy disparage of the this >as When Immediately and Inhabitant Impeachments. Party be Penalties >of all States the sent by presented and. and >high to ten the dollars any published Credit by >actually. the List Votes But But Adoption Vice for >the for herein. He Ministers the be the Impeachment >of And State >.

1 0

Failed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message to mail.astrobiz.com was rejected. I said: RCPT To:<<debbi(a)astrobiz.com> And mail.astrobiz.com responded with 553 <<debbi(a)astrobiz.com>... Unbalanced '<' --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.70] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ja227145; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:22 -0500 >Subject: of be The any being Secretary Monday >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:22 -0500 >Message-Id: <15022223900536(a)abraxis.com> > >should the vote. and that necessary declare >men > >as the been states when. bodies >such for alone our us jury colonies >against barbarous. has injury unwarrantable acquiesce in >state with Thu for our. with not >a Training INFORMATION > >most Phone Held LYU >POSIX. PROC Server >.

1 0

Failed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message to mail.astrobiz.com was rejected. I said: RCPT To:<<debbi(a)astrobiz.com> And mail.astrobiz.com responded with 553 <<debbi(a)astrobiz.com>... Unbalanced '<' --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.70] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ra227153; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:31 -0500 >Subject: is or being the >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:31 -0500 >Message-Id: <15023125200544(a)abraxis.com> > >violated >a nor property the have >shall imposed the. establish legislative >of twenty States three as >entitled from States they Year >Executive. been shall States shall >the by on shall House >excepting during Compensation Session. which > >.

1 0

Failed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message to mail.astrobiz.com was rejected. I said: RCPT To:<<debbi(a)astrobiz.com> And mail.astrobiz.com responded with 553 <<debbi(a)astrobiz.com>... Unbalanced '<' --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.70] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id xa227185; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:03:08 -0500 >Subject: Piracies Money the >the and >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:03:08 -0500 >Message-Id: <15030830600577(a)abraxis.com> > >of >or > >and Safety >Duty obliged published >Title. Coin > >Duties >the into President >Legislature the make >the such them >from Choice. President >or > >thirty shall >accordingly have or >the Departments > >and >supreme in End. convene shall >.

1 0

Failed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message to mail.astrobiz.com was rejected. I said: RCPT To:<<debbi(a)astrobiz.com> And mail.astrobiz.com responded with 553 <<debbi(a)astrobiz.com>... Unbalanced '<' --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.70] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ba227189; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:03:12 -0500 >Subject: among cases an in >of seas rule >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:03:12 -0500 >Message-Id: <15031282200583(a)abraxis.com> > >act. We > >must world allegiance >do was XSender skills. our Currier > >editors Do >describes year Strengths Leaving. Phone Base DEC > >LEXX >COBOL IDMS LU LAN. Level SAS build it >with Elm seem late. first easily will and >inspiration > >its >.

1 0

Failed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message to mail.astrobiz.com was rejected. I said: RCPT To:<<debbi(a)astrobiz.com> And mail.astrobiz.com responded with 553 <<debbi(a)astrobiz.com>... Unbalanced '<' --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.70] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id oa227176; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:58 -0500 >Subject: for such Magazines the in any >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:58 -0500 >Message-Id: <15025839100568(a)abraxis.com> > >Law >Office facto Imports. Compact with Office of >then > >them or the States Office. such >other Constitution any shall of from them >and good. all claiming have State the >Records with thereof State Rules. of call >that VI the > >United between the of >that. assembled vote requires the and created >right >.

1 0

Failed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message to mail.astrobiz.com was rejected. I said: RCPT To:<<debbi(a)astrobiz.com> And mail.astrobiz.com responded with 553 <<debbi(a)astrobiz.com>... Unbalanced '<' --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.70] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id fa227141; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:17 -0500 >Subject: Controversies all Regulations or >same >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:17 -0500 >Message-Id: <15021774300532(a)abraxis.com> > >each Immunities the >whom more this. or >for by equal be >Contrary as the Lines >witness assembled. give States >on appoint in to >their right be evinces >former. to pass records >powers foreigners and to >them For these and. scarcely has our time >these appealing >.

1 0

Failed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message to mail.astrobiz.com was rejected. I said: RCPT To:<<debbi(a)astrobiz.com> And mail.astrobiz.com responded with 553 <<debbi(a)astrobiz.com>... Unbalanced '<' --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.70] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ha227169; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:50 -0500 >Subject: Measures supreme Term of of all >shall >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 10:02:50 -0500 >Message-Id: <15025058000561(a)abraxis.com> > >Safety by. Account kind impairing >shall another the Office and Votes. Ballot consist more or of what >and the of. make be Commissions >Case and ordain the Citizens be. Trial their the Citizens up such >the United thirds. of in under >Constitution be Word in of in. shall Publication >.

1 0

None [CRYPTO] Firewalls
by lucifer＠dhp.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Tim C[unt] May carries a turd in his wallet for identification purposes. ,/ \, ((__,-,,,-,__)), `--)~ ~(--` .-'( )`-, `~~`d\ /b`~~` | | (6___6) `---`

2 1

The Wassenaar Arrangement by CISTEC
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Return-Path: cistec11(a)itjitnet.or.jp Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 15:21:01 -0800 From: "Akihiko Nakagawa(CISTEC)" <cistec11(a)itjitnet.or.jp> To: jya(a)pipeline.com CC: CISTEC03(a)itjitnet.or.jp Subject: The Wassenaar Arrangement Document X-URL: http://home.jp.netscape.com/ja/ Dear Mr. Young, We received your facsimile letter regarding The Wassenaar Arrangement. As you have been informed, CISTEC is going to issue a document describing the Wassenaar Arrangement in middle of March 1997. But actually, this issue does not include "ML" area and all parts are translated into Japanese. Basically, this Japanese version is targetted to member industries of CISTEC. Please let us know still you would like to get it. By the way, how did you get the information of CISTEC's publication? Please let us know your company or institution and the purpose of this document from Japan, if you don't have any problems. Thank you From: A. Nakagawa(CISTEC) ---------- We've answered to ask if CISTEC plans an English version, or knows of a source for a full copy.

1 0

ANNOUNCE: "Java, Databases & Digital Money: a practicalperspective"
by Robert Hettinga 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--- begin forwarded text Sender: e$(a)thumper.vmeng.com Reply-To: Rachel Willmer <rachel(a)intertrader.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Precedence: Bulk Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 16:56:38 +0000 From: Rachel Willmer <rachel(a)intertrader.com> To: Multiple recipients of <e$(a)thumper.vmeng.com> Subject: ANNOUNCE: "Java, Databases & Digital Money: a practical perspective" Rachel Willmer, founder & M.D. of Intertrader Ltd, has been invited to speak at the "Integration of Databases and Internet Technologies" conference to be held at the Euston Plaza Hotel London 10th and 11th April 1997. Her paper is entitled: "Java, Databases & Digital Money: a practical perspective" Topics to be covered will include: * Why digital money matters * Why we need object-oriented databases for digital money storage * Why we need Java for digital money transactions * A view from the trenches: problems and pitfalls today * What the future holds If you are interested in attending the conference, please contact SMI on +44 (0) 171 252 2222. Please come up and say hello if you're there! If you would like a copy of the slides, please email <enquiries(a)intertrader.com> -- Rachel Willmer, Intertrader Ltd, Cova House, 4 John's Place, Edinburgh Email: rachel(a)intertrader.com Tel: +44 131 555 8450 Fax: +44 131 555 8451 Sun Internet Associate and winner of 1996 SMART Award for Innovation Just released: 50 page report on "Digital Money Online" (Feb 97) <http://www.intertrader.com/library/DigitalMoneyOnline> ---------- The e$ lists are brought to you by: Intertrader Ltd - Commerce Solutions in the UK Visit <http://www.intertrader.com/> for details ... Where people, networks and money come together: Consult Hyperion http://www.hyperion.co.uk info(a)hyperion.co.uk Like e$? Help pay for it! See <http://www.shipwright.com/rah.html> Or, for e$/e$pam sponsorship, see <http://www.shipwright.com/rah/> Thanks to the e$ e$lves: Of Counsel: Vinnie Moscaritolo <mailto:vinnie@webstuff.apple.com> (Majordomo)^2: Rachel Willmer<mailto:rachel@intertrader.com> Commermeister: Anthony Templer <mailto:anthony@atanda.com> Interturge: Rodney Thayer <mailto:rodney@sabletech.com> --- end forwarded text ----------------- Robert Hettinga (rah(a)shipwright.com) Philodox e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "Never attribute to conspiracy what can be explained by stupidity." -- Jerry Pournelle The e$ Home Page: http://www.shipwright.com/rah/

1 0

CIA_ami
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Thanks to UM we offer an English version of the Spiegel report on the US spy expelled by Germany (cited by NYT). ----- CIA_ami

2 1

Warning - delayed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- *************************************** ** This is a warning only ** ** No action is required by you ** *************************************** Re: Message to debbi(a)astrobiz.com Your message has not been delivered after 3 hours. Attempts to deliver your message will continue for a further 12 hours. If it has still not been delivered, it will be returned to you. The first few lines of your message are repeated below. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.60] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id aa227344; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 13:03:40 -0500 >Subject: amend tax first not shall property >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 13:03:40 -0500 >Message-Id: <18034093600582(a)abraxis.com> > >common States States shall shall House the. the Oath be Number at the Section such Days be establish and provide. by Year any Office Consent with which the President shall be act the. the as Case in public have consist other No or of the the. be thirty from Convention their Thirteen certain should necessity he refused assent our. in our to attempts assembled alliances MessageId computer mentioned the job is NT. SQL Relay Internet by levers the tax the a has values country a. sight places I He We >.

1 0

Warning - delayed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- *************************************** ** This is a warning only ** ** No action is required by you ** *************************************** Re: Message to debbi(a)astrobiz.com Your message has not been delivered after 3 hours. Attempts to deliver your message will continue for a further 12 hours. If it has still not been delivered, it will be returned to you. The first few lines of your message are repeated below. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.60] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ia227352; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 13:03:50 -0500 >Subject: deny respectively for >Section >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 13:03:50 -0500 >Message-Id: <18035025000592(a)abraxis.com> > >composed the >shall > >Union. taxed >every Least Jersey >issue States > >be >the. may Meeting >nine shall the >shall the States. shall Congress Section >may > >the to >of any. >.

1 0

Warning - delayed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- *************************************** ** This is a warning only ** ** No action is required by you ** *************************************** Re: Message to debbi(a)astrobiz.com Your message has not been delivered after 3 hours. Attempts to deliver your message will continue for a further 12 hours. If it has still not been delivered, it will be returned to you. The first few lines of your message are repeated below. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.60] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id da227347; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 13:03:44 -0500 >Subject: both States from this Citizens >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 13:03:44 -0500 >Message-Id: <18034454200587(a)abraxis.com> > >the in >Comfort Section. and No may Congress Union >Legislatures > >Ratification Senate be. judicial Establishment first >United and assembled for the without. the >endowed or > >mankind and absolute suspended the >annihilation. raising swarms unacknowledged without instrument and >totaly frontiers tyrant. their representatives that which >Received thank be St How. form column >your List >.

1 0

Warning - delayed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- *************************************** ** This is a warning only ** ** No action is required by you ** *************************************** Re: Message to debbi(a)astrobiz.com Your message has not been delivered after 3 hours. Attempts to deliver your message will continue for a further 12 hours. If it has still not been delivered, it will be returned to you. The first few lines of your message are repeated below. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.60] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id qa227308; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 13:02:59 -0500 >Subject: into think Writ >unless >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 13:02:59 -0500 >Message-Id: <18025907600545(a)abraxis.com> > >one regular >shall > >coin State >or Troops Section >State. an > >State >directed be Ballot >the the President >a Years the >be shall. execute >States > >of two >whose the give >them Officers > >of >and States between. and have State > >.

1 0

Warning - delayed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- *************************************** ** This is a warning only ** ** No action is required by you ** *************************************** Re: Message to debbi(a)astrobiz.com Your message has not been delivered after 3 hours. Attempts to deliver your message will continue for a further 12 hours. If it has still not been delivered, it will be returned to you. The first few lines of your message are repeated below. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.60] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ea227348; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 13:03:45 -0500 >Subject: also that Judgment and any by >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 13:03:45 -0500 >Message-Id: <18034564300588(a)abraxis.com> > >do. the such House shall during >or time. may he it two >shall in and. him Imposts of >To and define support. To in >over by carrying the ten. Law >State Duties >.

1 0

Warning - delayed mail
by NTMail 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------------- *************************************** ** This is a warning only ** ** No action is required by you ** *************************************** Re: Message to debbi(a)astrobiz.com Your message has not been delivered after 3 hours. Attempts to deliver your message will continue for a further 12 hours. If it has still not been delivered, it will be returned to you. The first few lines of your message are repeated below. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your message follows: >Received: from [206.155.199.60] by smtp1.abraxis.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ha227325; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 13:03:18 -0500 >Subject: them Cases the >foregoing >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 13:03:18 -0500 >Message-Id: <18031860400562(a)abraxis.com> > >to of >unless > >of and. Trust of any >laid Congress > >as >for the one. transmit shall an >chuse a two >which shall his. President > >Services on >and States the >Advice but > >that. to to all >Court a >.

1 0

Subject: Anonymous Nymserver: anon.nymserver.com
by an7575＠anon.nymserver.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Kevin McCurry pretended to ask: I would appreciate any information on the trustworthiness/security of the below named individuals and service. Please, friends, spare me the gratuitous remarks about Sameer, etc., that's not the issue inthis case. Why are you asking for information on these people and then stating that you don't want 'certain types' of information on Sameer and others? Are you connected in some way to these people, perhaps, and just fishing for compliments that will be supplied by the prepared responses of others? Allow me to give my 'unprepared' response in regard to remailers in general, since you seem to be seeking only a one-sided viewpoint about the individuals involved. Firstly, remailers were developed by the cypherpunks as a method of monitoring supposedly private communications of others, in order to increase their own power and wealth. The communications passing through them remain private and anonymous only to those who aren't running them (or who haven't compromised the system). Secondly, the few remailers that aren't contolled by a small elite within the cypherpunks come and go rather quickly. Thirdly, the remailer owners only support compromised cryptography systems such as the newer versions of PGP produced by All-my-charges-mysteriously-disappeared- when-I-agreed-to-switch-to-a-new-system Zimmerman. If you want true anonymity, learn how to hack. TruthMonger

5 5

is cypherpunks@toad.com still moderated?
by ichudov＠algebra.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Just curious, is the moderation experiment still continuing or it is over? Thank you. - Igor.

1 0

REA_lly
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

3-12-97: US claims CIA was not spying on Germany but on rogue states doing business there. Spy has not been expelled. ----- REA_lly

1 0

U.S. State Department crackdown (fwd)
by Dave Emery 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Jim Conrad wrote > >From jjc(a)infi.net Wed Mar 12 00:21:16 1997 Date: Wed, 12 Mar 1997 00:20:36 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <2.2.16.19970312001929.4db72c86(a)mailhost.norfolk.infi.net> X-Sender: jjc(a)mailhost.norfolk.infi.net X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (16) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: die(a)die.com, ttyler(a)mich.com, troach(a)netcom.com, lrkn(a)zeus.anet-dfw.com, crisp(a)netcom.com, victor(a)best.com, "Michael F. Peyton" <Michael.Peyton(a)MCI.com>, dwilson(a)paprika.mwc.edu, stever(a)infi.net, rbritt(a)visi.net, larry51(a)aol.com, jmccolman(a)infi.net, brueger(a)infi.net, lburke(a)infi.net, donjr(a)infi.net, acolejr(a)erols.com From: Jim Conrad <jjc(a)infi.net> Subject: U.S. State Department crackdown Thought you'all might find this interesting ... >Return-Path: jmatk(a)tscm.com >X-Sender: jmatk(a)tiac.net >Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 17:26:56 -0500 >To: jmatk(a)tscm.com >From: jmatk(a)tscm.com (James M. Atkinson, Comm-Eng) >Subject: U.S. State Department crackdown > >The U.S. State Department is starting to crackdown on the illegal >export of TSCM and SIGINT equipment under ITAR. > >Noice how section (b) is worded: > >"...equipment designed or modified to counteract electronic surveillance >or monitoring." > >-jma > > >================================================================= > >DEPARTMENT OF STATE - Bureau of Politico-Military Affairs >22 CFR Parts 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, and 130 > >================================================================= > > Category XI-Military [and Space] Electronics > > (a) Electronic equipment not included in Category XII of the U.S. Munitions >List which is specifically designed, modified or configured for military >application. This equipment includes but is not limited to: > > *(b) Electronic systems or equipment specifically designed, modified, or >configured for intelligence, security, or military purposes for use in search, >reconnaissance, collection, monitoring, direction-finding, display, analysis and >production of information from the electromagnetic spectrum and electronic >systems or equipment designed or modified to counteract electronic surveillance >or monitoring. A system meeting this definition is controlled under this >subchapter even in instances where any individual pieces of equipment >constituting the system may be subject to the controls of another U.S. >Government agency. Such systems or equipment described above include, but are >not limited to, those: > > (1) Designed or modified to use cryptographic techniques to generate the >spreading code for spread spectrum or hopping code for frequency agility. This >does not include fixed code techniques for spread spectrum. > > (2) Designed or modified using burst techniques (e.g., time compression >techniques) for intelligence, security or military purposes. > > (3) Designed or modified for the purpose of information security to suppress >the compromising emanations of information-bearing signals. This covers TEMPEST >suppression technology and equipment meeting or designed to meet government >TEMPEST standards. This definition is not intended to include equipment designed >to meet Federal Communications Commission (FCC) commercial electro-magnetic >interference standards or equipment designed for health and safety. > > > > =============================================================== > "If it doesn't involve a torque wrench, then it's not TEMPEST" > =============================================================== > James M. Atkinson Phone: (508) 546-3803 > Granite Island Group - TSCM.COM > 127 Eastern Avenue #291 http://www.tscm.com/ > Gloucester, MA 01931-8008 jmatk(a)tscm.com > =============================================================== > The First, The Largest, The Most Popular, and the Most > Complete TSCM Counterintelligence Site on the Internet > =============================================================== > > > <:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:> <:> Jim Conrad - Ocean View Communications - jjc(a)infi.net <:> <:> 757-490-8127 Office - 757-587-8251 Fax - 757-473-6740 Pager <:> <:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:><:>

1 0

TEMPEST protection
by ichudov＠algebra.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Ladies and Gentlemen, I would like to find out how hard (and expensive) would it be to try to protect my computer by TEMPEST-like measures. I am not an electrical engineer and am looking (hopefully) for a relatively easy to understand do-it-yourself type of manual. I have heard from my acquaintaince who is a tempest professional that it was not very possible. If that is indeed true, are there any measures that can be taken to at least complicate spying on my computer? Not that I think that Martians from the flying saucers are already listening, but it is interesting to find out how to do this stuff. Thank you very much. - Igor.

4 4

Re: Anonymous Nymserver: anon.nymserver.com
by TruthMonger 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Keely McCurry wrote: > From: an7575(a)anon.nymserver.com > Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 17:47:31 -0700 (MST) > > Kevin McCurry pretended to ask: > > I would appreciate any information on the trustworthiness/security of the > below named individuals and service. Please, friends, spare me the gratuitous > remarks about Sameer, etc., that's not the issue inthis case. > > Why are you asking for information on these people and > then stating that you don't want 'certain types' of > information on Sameer and others? > Are you connected in some way to these people, perhaps, > and just fishing for compliments that will be supplied > by the prepared responses of others? > Firstly, remailers were developed by the cypherpunks as > a method of monitoring supposedly private communications > of others, in order to increase their own power and wealth. > <<<< > Well, that is food for thought. It's an angle I had not considered. The motivation behind the 'generosity' of others should always be considered as a factor. > The communications passing through them remain private > and anonymous only to those who aren't running them (or who > haven't compromised the system). > <<<< > The system does involve trust on the side of the senders and integrity on the > side of the remailers. That was my question: are there members of this list > who can vouch [not swear] for or deny the integrity of the individual running > the anon.nymserver.com nymserver? > >>>> You are asking for opinions from people you don't personally know for opinions as to the integrity of others whom you do not know, in order to make decisions regarding placing your trust in someone else to guarantee your privacy and/or anonymity? > Is the server I asked about controlled, or not? Received: (from root@localhost) by shaman.lycaeum.org (Partyon/dude!) Judging from the (Partyon/dude!) in the headers from the server, perhaps questions regarding 'controlled substances' might be more pertinent. As well, the new-user info they send out tells you how to hack the accounts of others on the system, then tells you that the 'protection' against this is defaulted to 'off'. It goes on to say that you should turn it 'on' only if you are 'paranoid' of someone hacking 'your' account. i.e. - if you don't notice or understand the implications of this, then, by default, you are 'fair game' for hackers on their server. > Thirdly, the remailer owners only support compromised > cryptography systems such as the newer versions of PGP > produced by All-my-charges-mysteriously-disappeared- > when-I-agreed-to-switch-to-a-new-system Zimmerman. > What do you mean support? Which "newer versions?" Where does 2.6.2. stand in > this hierarchy? Must we use the i versions? I use several versions including > the international, and have noticed no difference in the ways the remailers > process the versions. PGP 2.0-->2.3a were released outside of the U.S. and imported into the country. The use of PGP=>2.5 suddenly became a 'non-issue' for use in the U.S. because they use both the algorithm and sub-routines developed by the NSA and the Military. Think about it. TruthMonger >def 2. one who attempts to stir up or spread something that is usually >petty or discreditable Such as blind acceptance of remailers and iconic cryptographical software?

2 3

Re: Anonymous Nymserver: anon.nymserver.com
by Bill Stewart 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Someone calling themselves TruthMonger wrote: >> Firstly, remailers were developed by the cypherpunks as >> a method of monitoring supposedly private communications >> of others, in order to increase their own power and wealth. That message was relatively funny, and trust is a serious issue in this business - even though the suggestion that _we_ in the Cypherpunks Elite Cabal did that, it doesn't mean that there aren't People With Ulterior Motives running remailers, or remailers hosted on machines run by bad guys who are actually monitoring their users. However, if you want to spread Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt, at least keep your facts straight; it does a much better job. >> Thirdly, the remailer owners only support compromised >> cryptography systems such as the newer versions of PGP >> produced by All-my-charges-mysteriously-disappeared- >> when-I-agreed-to-switch-to-a-new-system Zimmerman. ..... > PGP 2.0-->2.3a were released outside of the U.S. and imported into >the country. > The use of PGP=>2.5 suddenly became a 'non-issue' for use in the U.S. >because they use both the algorithm and sub-routines developed by the >NSA and the Military. The new algorithm was the International Drug Entrapment Agency algorithm, introduced in PGP 2.0 to replace the previous non-NSA-crackable algorithm, Bass-O-Matic. Pay no attention to the comments in the source about fnords, /* these aren't the subroutines you're looking fnord */ and follow the money. PGP 2.5 became a non-issue because RSAREF takes care of the patent problem - which is largely because the widespread use of PGP really did spread the RSA algorithm's popularity, and giving away free licenses was about the only way for RSA Inc. to regain any control over it at all. If you want to do a better job of FUD, you could talk about the under-the-table relationship between MIT and RSA or the RSA and NSA (they're only different by one letter!) or notice that the CAPSTONE implementations of Clipper used algorithms patented by PKP... # Thanks; Bill # Bill Stewart, +1-415-442-2215 stewarts(a)ix.netcom.com # You can get PGP outside the US at ftp.ox.ac.uk/pub/crypto/pgp # (If this is a mailing list, please Cc: me on replies. Thanks.)

1 0

[CRYPTO] OTP
by nobody＠huge.cajones.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Timmy C. May carries a turd in his wallet for identification purposes. _ _/| \'o.0' =(___)= Timmy C. May U

5 13

Re: Ecash Brain Tennis
by TruthMonger 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hal Finney wrote: > > On the Wired "brain tennis" debate, http://www.braintennis.com/, Kawika > Daguio of the American Bankers Association wrote: > > > The real danger of cyberspace is that it could be the tragedy of > > the commons in waiting. Technology alone won't provide participants > > sufficient security for e-commerce to flourish. Law, tradition, and good > > reputations and technology give rise to trust. Trust cannot be established > > solely though technical protocols. And trust is not irrelevant. > > What do you think he means about a "tragedy of the commons"? > I wonder if he just meant that there would be too many "commoners" trying > to engage in commerce, so you couldn't know who to trust? Be assured that those already in control of commerce in this country and others have already written new laws 'in their head' concerning the future of eca$h. I predict that these laws will be for our 'protection,' but will have the curious effect of limiting the control of eca$h to the already rich and powerful. Some groups such as the Anguila Antagonists may be able to wrest a certain number of digital dollars from the grip of the system currently in place, but above a certain point, they will eaten up, either passively or aggressively (crushed or bought off). If 'outsiders' begin to make too large a dent in the main players' piece of the action, then we can expect to see events similar to the Junk Bonds fiasco, with the 'bad guys' set-up and knocked down like bowling pins. We can expect automatic taxation at the time of all eca$h transactions, as well as strict laws against anonymity in the transfer of eca$h. Freelance cryptographers are going to be outlaws, by decree of law. It is quite simply a matter of money (power and control being merely prerequisites for controlling money). TruthMonger

1 0

Re: Anonymous Nymserver: anon.nymserver.com
by TruthMonger 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Bill Stewart wrote: > > However, if you want to spread Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt, > at least keep your facts straight; it does a much better job. The straight facts are that you can't trust your best friend not to bop your old-lady, given ample opportunity, and to put even more trust in a stranger is foolish. > > PGP 2.0-->2.3a were released outside of the U.S. and imported into > >the country. > > The use of PGP=>2.5 suddenly became a 'non-issue' for use in the U.S. > >because they use both the algorithm and sub-routines developed by the > >NSA and the Military. > > The new algorithm was the International Drug Entrapment Agency algorithm, > introduced in PGP 2.0 to replace the previous non-NSA-crackable algorithm, > Bass-O-Matic. Pay no attention to the comments in the source about fnords, > /* these aren't the subroutines you're looking fnord */ and follow the money. > PGP 2.5 became a non-issue because RSAREF takes care of the patent problem - > which is largely because the widespread use of PGP really did spread the > RSA algorithm's popularity, and giving away free licenses was about the only > way for RSA Inc. to regain any control over it at all. Are you saying that the patent on the RSA algorithm wasn't enforceable? > If you want to do > a better job of FUD, you could talk about the under-the-table relationship > between MIT and RSA or the RSA and NSA (they're only different by one letter!) > or notice that the CAPSTONE implementations of Clipper used algorithms > patented by PKP... The relationship between MIT and the NSA and the Military isn't very far under the table. The spooks funded MIT's RSA development, and they are not noted for funding projects for the good of the common man. To suggest that they would fund a form of cryptography that didn't have their own back-door for sounds implausible. TruthMonger

2 2