December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Need a Computer?? No Money Down!!
by 336688zs＠mci.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

<HTML><BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffdf"> ...BRAND NEW PENTIUM II... ..COMPUTER.. ..NO MONEY DOWN... ...EARN HUGE INCOME.... only serious inquiries only! (for more information & application leave your name, fax & phone #) More info: put "COMPUTER" in subject area and mailto: fwd617(a)mycomsoftware.net Click Here </HTML>

1 0

$36000 in 14 Weeks
by Company98 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hi My name is Jacqueline McCormack and I would like to show you how easy it is to really make a lot of money. I wouldn't be wasting my time doing this if I didn't know this system works,and all the money you invest is less than an evening at the movies for two. Anyone surely can afford that. I received a letter just like the one your reading now from a lady name Karren Liddel and the rest is history. Here is the email I received and judge for yourself if this will work or not. This is truly the one path I've found to financial freedom. Thanks for your time Jacque ================================================================= I Never Thought I'd Be the One Telling You This: I Actually Read a Piece of E-Mail & I'm Going to Europe on the Proceeds! Hello! My name is Karen Liddell; I'm a 35-year-old mom, wife, and part-time accountant. As a rule, I delete all unsolicited "junk" e-mail and use my account primarily for business. I received what I assumed was this same e-mail countless times and deleted it each time. About two months ago I received it again and, because of the catchy subject line, I finally read it. Afterwards, I thought , "OK, I give in, I'm going to try this. I can certainly afford to invest $20 and, on the other hand, there's nothing wrong with creating a little excess cash." I promptly mailed four $5 bills and, after receiving the reports, paid a friend of mine a small fee to send out some e-mail advertisements for me. After reading the reports, I also learned how easy it is to bulk e-mail for free! I was not prepared for the results. Everyday for the last six weeks, my P.O. box has been overflowing with $5 bills; many days the excess fills up an extra mail bin and I've had to upgrade to the corporate-size box! I am stunned by all the money that keeps rolling in! My husband and I have been saving for several years to make a substantial down payment on a house. Now, not only are we purchasing a house with 40% down, we're going to Venice, Italy to celebrate! I promise you, if you follow the directions in this e-mail and be prepared to eventually set aside about an hour each day to follow up (and count your money!), you will make at least as much money as we did. You don't need to be a wiz at the computer, but I'll bet you already are. If you can open an envelope, remove the money, and send an e-mail message, then you're on your way to the bank. Take the time to read this so you'll understand how easy it is. If I can do this, so can you! GO FOR IT NOW!! Karen Liddell The following is a copy of the e-mail I read: $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ This is a LEGAL, MONEY-MAKING PHENOMENON. PRINT this letter, read the directions, THEN READ IT AGAIN !!! You are about to embark on the most profitable and unique program you may ever see. Many times over, it has demonstrated and proven its ability to generate large amounts of cash. This program is showing fantastic appeal with a huge and ever-growing on-line population desirous of additional income. This is a legitimate, LEGAL, money-making opportunity. It does not require you to come in contact with people, do any hard work, and best of all, you never have to leave the house, except to get the mail and go to the bank! This truly is that lucky break you've been waiting for! Simply follow the easy instructions in this letter, and your financial dreams will come true! When followed correctly, this electronic, multi-level marketing program works perfectly...100% EVERY TIME! Thousands of people have used this program to: - Raise capital to start their own business - Pay off debts - Buy homes, cars, etc., - Even retire! This is your chance, so don't pass it up! ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- OVERVIEW OF THIS EXTRAORDINARY ELECTRONIC MULTI-LEVEL MARKETING PROGRAM ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- Basically, this is what we do: We send thousands of people a product for $5.00 that costs next to nothing to produce and e-mail. As with all multi-level businesses, we build our business by recruiting new partners and selling our products. Every state in the U.S. allows you to recruit new multi- level business online (via your computer). The products in this program are a series of four business and financial reports costing $5.00 each. Each order you receive via "snail mail" will include: * $5.00 cash * The name and number of the report they are ordering * The e-mail address where you will e-mail them the report they ordered. To fill each order, you simply e-mail the product to the buyer. THAT'S IT! The $5.00 is yours! This is the EASIEST electronic multi-level marketing business anywhere! FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS TO THE LETTER AND BE PREPARED TO REAP THE STAGGERING BENEFITS! ******* I N S T R U C T I O N S ******* This is what you MUST do: 1. Order all 4 reports shown on the list below (you can't sell them if you don't order them). * For each report, send $5.00 CASH, the NAME & NUMBER OF THE REPORT YOU ARE ORDERING, YOUR E-MAIL ADDRESS, and YOUR RETURN POSTAL ADDRESS (in case of a problem) to the person whose name appears on the list next to the report. * When you place your order, make sure you order each of the four reports. You will need all four reports so that you can save them on your computer and resell them. * Within a few days you will receive, via e-mail, each of the four reports. Save them on your computer so they will be accessible for you to send to the 1,000's of people who will order them from you. 2. IMPORTANT-- DO NOT alter the names of the people who are listed next to each report, or their sequence on the list, in any way other than is instructed below in steps "a" through "d" or you will lose out on the majority of your profits. Once you understand the way this works, you'll also see how it doesn't work if you change it. Remember, this method has been tested, and if you alter it, it will not work. a. Look below for the listing of available reports. b. After you've ordered the four reports, replace the name and address under REPORT #1 with your name and address, moving the one that was there down to REPORT #2. c. Move the name and address that was under REPORT #2 down to REPORT #3. d. Move the name and address that was under REPORT #3 down to REPORT #4. e. The name and address that was under REPORT #4 is removed from the list and has NO DOUBT collected their 50 grand. Please make sure you copy everyone's name and address ACCURATELY!!! 3. Take this entire letter, including the modified list of names, and save it to your computer. Make NO changes to the instruction portion of this letter. 4. Now you're ready to start an advertising campaign on the WORLDWIDE WEB! Advertising on the WEB is very, very inexpensive, and there are HUNDREDS of FREE places to advertise. Another avenue which you could use for advertising is e-mail lists. You can buy these lists for under $20/2,000 addresses or you can pay someone a minimal charge to take care of it for you. BE SURE TO START YOUR AD CAMPAIGN IMMEDIATELY! 5. For every $5.00 you receive, all you must do is e-mail them the report they ordered. THAT'S IT! ALWAYS PROVIDE SAME-DAY SERVICE ON ALL ORDERS! This will guarantee that the e-mail THEY send out, with YOUR name and address on it, will be prompt because they can't advertise until they receive the report! ------------------------------------------ AVAILABLE REPORTS ------------------------------------------ ***Order Each REPORT by NUMBER and NAME*** Notes: - ALWAYS SEND $5 CASH FOR EACH REPORT - ALWAYS SEND YOUR ORDER VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL - Make sure the cash is concealed by wrapping it in at least two sheets of paper - On one of those sheets of paper, include: (a) the number & name of the report you are ordering, (b) your e-mail address, and (c) your postal address. _________________________________________________________________ REPORT #1 "HOW TO REORGANIZE YOUR TIME TO ACCOMMODATE A HOME BASED BUSINESS" ORDER REPORT #1 FROM: COMPANY98 3941 E. CHANDLER BLVD SUITE 106-142 PHOENIX, AZ 85044 _________________________________________________________________ REPORT #2 "MAJOR CORPORATIONS AND E-MAIL" ORDER REPORT #2 FROM: ACY 3800 DEWEY AVE #298 ROCHESTER, NY 14616 _________________________________________________________________ REPORT #3 "SOURCES FOR THE BEST MAILING LISTS" ORDER REPORT #3 FROM: BUSINESS RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 459 COLUMBUS AVE, SUITE#504 NEW YORK, NY 10024 _________________________________________________________________ REPORT #4 "EVALUATING MULTI-LEVEL SALES PLANS" ORDER REPORT #4 FROM: BASQUIAT PO BOX 1963 EVANSTON, IL 60204 _________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------- HERE'S HOW THIS AMAZING PLAN WILL MAKE YOU $MONEY$ ----------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------- Let's say you decide to start small just to see how well it works. Assume your goal is to get 10 people to participate on your first level. (Placing a lot of FREE ads on the Internet will EASILY get a larger response.) Also assume that everyone else in YOUR ORGANIZATION gets ONLY 10 downline members. Follow this example to achieve the STAGGERING results below. 1st level--your 10 members with $5...........................................$50 2nd level--10 members from those 10 ($5 x 100)..................$500 3rd level--10 members from those 100 ($5 x 1,000)..........$5,000 4th level--10 members from those 1,000 ($5 x 10,000)...$50,000 THIS TOTALS ----------->$55,550 Remember friends, this assumes that the people who participate only recruit 10 people each. Think for a moment what would happen if they got 20 people to participate! Most people get 100's of participants! THINK ABOUT IT! Your cost to participate in this is practically nothing (surely you can afford $20). You obviously already have an Internet connection and e-mail is FREE!!! REPORT#3 shows you the most productive methods for bulk e-mailing and purchasing e-mail lists. Some list & bulk e-mail vendors even work on trade! About 50,000 new people get online every month! *******TIPS FOR SUCCESS******* * TREAT THIS AS YOUR BUSINESS! Be prompt, professional, and follow the directions accurately. * Send for the four reports IMMEDIATELY so you will have them when the orders start coming in because: When you receive a $5 order, you MUST send out the requested product/report to comply with the U.S. Postal & Lottery Laws, Title 18,Sections 1302 and 1341 or Title 18, Section 3005 in the U.S. Code, also Code of Federal Regs. vol. 16, Sections 255 and 436, which state that "a product or service must be exchanged for money received." * ALWAYS PROVIDE SAME-DAY SERVICE ON THE ORDERS YOU RECEIVE. * Be patient and persistent with this program. If you follow the instructions exactly, the results WILL undoubtedly be SUCCESSFUL! * ABOVE ALL, HAVE FAITH IN YOURSELF AND KNOW YOU WILL SUCCEED! *******YOUR SUCCESS GUIDELINE******* Follow these guidelines to guarantee your success: If you don't receive 10 to 20 orders for REPORT #1 within two weeks, continue advertising until you do. Then, a couple of weeks later you should receive at least 100 orders for REPORT #2. If you don't, continue advertising until you do. Once you have received 100 or more orders for REPORT #2, YOU CAN RELAX, because the system is already working for you, and the cash will continue to roll in! THIS IS IMPORTANT TO REMEMBER: Every time your name is moved down on the list, you are placed in front of a DIFFERENT report. You can KEEP TRACK of your PROGRESS by watching which report people are ordering from you. If you want to generate more income, send another batch of e-mails and start the whole process again! There is no limit to the income you will generate from this business! NOTE: If you need help with starting a business, registering a business name, how income tax is handled, etc., contact your local office of the Small Business Administration (a Federal agency) for free help and answers to questions. Also, the Internal Revenue Service offers free help via telephone and free seminars about business taxes. *******T E S T I M O N I A L S******* This program does work, but you must follow it EXACTLY! Especially the rule of not trying to place your name in a different position, it won't work and you'll lose a lot of potential income. I'm living proof that it works. It really is a great opportunity to make relatively easy money, with little cost to you. If you do choose to participate, follow the program exactly, and you'll be on your way to financial security. Sean McLaughlin, Jackson, MS My name is Frank. My wife, Doris, and I live in Bel-Air, MD. I am a cost accountant with a major U.S. Corporation and I make pretty good money. When I received the program I grumbled to Doris about receiving "junk mail." I made fun of the whole thing, spouting my knowledge of the population and percentages involved. I "knew" it wouldn't work. Doris totally ignored my supposed intelligence and jumped in with both feet. I made merciless fun of her, and was ready to lay the old "I told you so" on her when the thing didn't work... well, the laugh was on me! Within two weeks she had received over 50 responses. Within 45 days she had received over $147,200 in $5 bills! I was shocked! I was sure that I had it all figured and that it wouldn't work. I AM a believer now. I have joined Doris in her "hobby." I did have seven more years until retirement, but I think of the "rat race" and it's not for me. We owe it all to MLM. Frank T., Bel-Air, MD I just want to pass along my best wishes and encouragement to you. Any doubts you have will vanish when your first orders come in. I even checked with the U.S. Post Office to verify that the plan was legal. It definitely is! IT WORKS!!! Paul Johnson, Raleigh, NC The main reason for this letter is to convince you that this system is honest, lawful, extremely profitable, and is a way to get a large amount of money in a short time. I was approached several times before I checked this out. I joined just to see what one could expect in return for the minimal effort and money required. To my astonishment, I received $36,470.00 in the first 14 weeks, with money still coming in. Sincerely yours, Phillip A. Brown, Esq. Not being the gambling type, it took me several weeks to make up my mind to participate in this plan. But conservative that I am, I decided that the initial investment was so little that there was just no way that I wouldn't get enough orders to at least get my money back. Boy, was I surprised when I found my medium-size post office box crammed with orders! For awhile, it got so overloaded that I had to start picking up my mail at the window. I'll make more money this year than any 10 years of my life before. The nice thing about this deal is that it doesn't matter where in the U.S. the people live. There simply isn't a better investment with a faster return. Mary Rockland, Lansing, MI I had received this program before. I deleted it, but later I wondered if I shouldn't have given it a try. Of course, I had no idea who to contact to get another copy, so I had to wait until I was e-mailed another program...11 months passed then it came...I didn't delete this one!...I made more than $41,000 on the first try!! D. Wilburn, Muncie, IN This is my third time to participate in this plan. We have quit our jobs, and will soon buy a home on the beach and live off the interest on our money. The only way on earth that this plan will work for you is if you do it. For your sake, and for your family's sake don't pass up this golden opportunity. Good luck and happy spending! Charles Fairchild, Spokane, WA ORDER YOUR REPORTS TODAY AND GET STARTED ON YOUR ROAD TO FINANCIAL FREEDOM!!! When you are ready for a bulk e-mailer call Smith International at 352-629-7695. They do good work. You can send an e-mail to their autoresponder at popcorn(a)mfi.net. Just click on the blue letters and enter the words "Bulk Email Info" in the Subject Line and in the body of the letter and then click on the Send Now button. All remove requests sent to the above address will receive an autoresponded informational flyer. E-mail addresses are recorded at that site. They were charging only $210 for 100,000 TRUE AOL addresses.

1 0

Get the MONEY You Need
by moneyhelp＠mymail.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

GET THE MONEY YOU NEED RIGHT NOW! Here's your chance to... > Eliminate Credit Card Debt! > Escape from High Monthly Payments! > Get Relief and Have the Money You Need! > Cash in Your Pocket Usually within 7 to 14 days! > Make Home Improvements You've Always Wanted! > Take the Vacation You Deserve! How? Simply CLICK HERE TO VISIT OUR WEBSITE! or type or cut & paste: http://www.canus.net/amcap/146.html in your browser Would you like money for... ~ A New Car? ~ College Tuition? ~ Taxes? ~ Consolidate Your Credit Cards? ~ A Dream Vacation? ~ Home Improvements? Now It Can Be Yours! What are you waiting for? For a FREE evaluation please visit our website by... CLICKING HERE (http://www.canus.net/amcap/146.html) or type or cut & paste: http://www.canus.net/amcap/146.html in your browser Especially if you're a homeowner, we can help you. Try us!

1 0

Jim Bell Violation Update
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Jim Bell was released on parole on April 20, but may be about to be rearrested for parole violation, and may not yet know the cops are coming to reviolate: http://jya.com/jdb062198.htm

1 0

Eric Young: Zimmerman redux?
by Trei, Peter 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Date: 20 Jun 1998 18:40:14 -0000 From: Julian Assange <proff(a)iq.org> To: ukcrypto(a)maillist.ox.ac.uk With things starting to heat up here in Australia (DoD/DSD has recently taken to making some exceptionally nasty noises about prosecuting Eric Young, Tim Hudson and the rest of the Australian CryptoMozilla team). I'd like to remind everyone who's interested in aussie/nz crypto issues of the aucrypto mailing list. <snip> Australasian & Pacific Cryptography mail the word "subscribe" to aucrypto-request(a)suburbia.net

2 1

#cypherpunks open
by Lucky Green 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

#cypherpunks is open on EFnet. -- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred "I do believe that where there is a choice only between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence." Mahatma Gandhi

1 0

Judicial Misconduct at Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals
by bill payne 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Monday 6/22/98 1:02 PM Senate Judiciary Committee http://www.senate.gov/committee/judiciary.html Republicans Orrin G. Hatch, Utah, Chairman senator_hatch(a)Hatch.senate.gov Strom Thurmond, South Carolina senator(a)thurmond.senate.gov Charles E. Grassley, Iowa chuck_grassley(a)grassley.senate.gov Arlen Specter, Pennsylvania senator_specter(a)specter.senate.gov Fred Thompson, Tennessee senator_thompson(a)thompson.senate.gov Jon Kyl, Arizona info(a)kyl.senate.gov Mike DeWine, Ohio senator_dewine(a)dewine.senate.gov John Ashcroft, Missouri john_ashcroft(a)ashcroft.senate.gov Spencer Abraham, Michigan michigan(a)abraham.senate.gov Jeff Sessions, Alabama Democrats Patrick J. Leahy, Vermont senator_leahy(a)leahy.senate.gov Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts senator(a)kennedy.senate.gov Joseph R.Biden, Jr., Delaware senator(a)biden.senate.gov Herb Kohl, Wisconsin senator_kohl(a)kohl.senate.gov Dianne Feinstein, California senator(a)feinstein.senate.gov Russell D. Feingold, Wisconsin russell_feingold(a)feingold.senate.gov Richard Durbin, Illinois dick(a)durbin.senate.gov Robert Torricelli, New Jersey senator(a)torricelli.senate.gov Purpose of this e-mail is to give written proof of criminal judicial misconduct by Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals clerks Hoecker, Fisher, and Judges Moore, Barrett, Weis and help get this matter settled. Thursday March 30, 1995 I wrote Tenth Circuit clerk Hoecker to request a copy of the docket sheets for case 94-2205 Payne v. Sandia Corporation, et al Hoecker did not answer my letter. On Tuesday March 5,1996 I wrote Judge Lucius D. Bunton to ask his help to get a copy of the docket sheets. No response. On Monday September 23, 1996 Arthur R Morales and I wrote Henry A. Politz, Chief Judge U.S. Court of Appeals - Fifth Circuit to ask his help to get a copy of the docket sheets of my case and Morales Tenth Circuit case 95-2204. Tenth Circuit also refused to send Morales copies of docket sheets for his case. Politz is Bunton's boss. No response. Friday May 30, 1997 I wrote Antonin Scalia to get this help to get a copy of the docket sheets. No response. 5 May 1998 citizen John Young finds docket sheets on Source: PACER, U.S. Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit, 1-800-279-9107 and posts them on Internet at http://jya.com/whp-10usca.htm Docket as of April 10, 1998 0:05 am Proceedings include all events. 94-2205 Payne v. Sandia Corporation, et al shows that I filed my Brief of the Appellant on 2/19/95. 2/23/95 [835344] Appellant's brief filed by William H. Payne. Original and 7 copies. c/s: y. Served on 2/19/95 Oral argument? pro se. Appellee/Respondent's brief due 3/24/95 for Thomas P. Wright, for Robert Surran, for Paul A. Stokes, for Mary J. Stang, for Tommy A. Sellers, for Craig A. Searls, for Albert Narath, for Preston B. Herrington, for Peter S. Hamilton, for Roger L. Hagengruber, for James R. Gosler, for Harold L. Folley, for Robert L. Ewing, for C. William Childers, for Harvey J. Brewster, for Sandia Corporation (mbm) mbm writes "Appellee/Respondent's brief due 3/24/95" Sandia had sent me a copy of its brief by 3/28/96. I filed attached MOTION TO GRANT PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT'S DEMANDS ON BASIS THAT DEFENDANT-APPELLEES FAILED TO FILE BRIEF WITHIN 30 DAYS SPECIFIED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 31 on Tuesday the 28th day of March, 1995 My February 28 MOTION at the Tenth Circuit is filed WITHOUT notice of service logged. 4/4/95 [845484] Appellant's motion filed by Appellant William H. Payne [94-2205] to grant appellant's demands on basis that appellees' failed to file timely brief. Original and 3 copies c/s: y (mbm) In 1995 FRAP 25 (a) stated "[b]riefs shall be deemed filed on the day of mailing if the most expeditious form of delivery by mail, excepting special delivery, is used." FRAP 25 has been changed by 1998 to http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/docs/frap-iop.htm#25a Since I mailed Appellant's motion filed by Appellant William H. Payne [94-2205] to grant appellant's demands on basis that appellees' failed to file timely brief on 3/28/98, it is likely Sandia's lawyer Friedman received it 3/29/95. Tenth Circuit logs 3/30/95 [844759] Appellee's brief filed by Sandia Corporation, Harvey J. Brewster, C. William Childers, Robert L. Ewing, Harold L. Folley, James R. Gosler, Roger L. Hagengruber, Peter S. Hamilton, Preston B. Herrington, Albert Narath, Craig A. Searls, Tommy A. Sellers, Mary J. Stang, Paul A. Stokes, Robert Surran, Thomas P. Wright. Original and 7 copies. c/s: y. Served on 3/27/95 Oral Argument? y (appellant is pro se) Appellant's optional reply brief due 4/13/95 for William H. Payne (mbm) Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure [FRAP] 26 (c) states (c) Additional Time after Service. When a party is required or permitted to act within a prescribed period after service of a paper upon that party, 3 calendar days are added to the prescribed period unless the paper is delivered on the date of service stated in the proof of service. http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/docs/frap-iop.htm#26c While the Tenth Circuit ASSERTS Appellees brief was, in fact, served on 3/27/95 evidence given below points to the brief was served, in fact, on 3/29/95. I allege that Friedman affixed a false date of service to Sandia's brief. I WAS NEVER PROPERLY SERVED. I wrote Wednesday March 29, 1995 Dan Friedman Simons, Cuddy & Friedman Pecos Trail Office Compound 1701 Old Pecos Trail POB 4160 Santa Fe, NM 87502-4160 505-988-4476 505-984-1807 FAX Dear Lawyer Friedman: Today at 14:00 hours I found a green and white about 9x13 inch envelope in our mail box at my home. Mailing label indicated that the envelope came from your firm. CONFIDENTIAL was stamped on the mailing label. I wrote "Received at 14:00 hours on W 3/29/95 with no POSTMARK OR STAMP by W. H. Payne" at the bottom of the envelope. There was no STAMP OR POSTAGE METER LABEL or POSTMARK on the envelope. Therefore, I gave the envelope to US Postal Service supervisor Mel at 14:49 hours today at the Postal Receiving station at 9904 Montgomery, NW in Albuquerque. Mel has a copy of the cover of the envelope with Mel's note written on it. Mel told me the post office was going to return the envelope to your firm for proper mailing. I ask: 1 What did this envelope contain? Please identify the documents precisely. 2 If any Certificates of Service were included in the envelope, then what were the dates affixed to these documents? 3 Who placed this envelope in our mail box? Lawyer Friedman: It appears you missed an important filing date. And are in the process of attempt to correct your failure. But may be using illegitimate methods to conceal your failure. Please respond as soon as possible so that we all may discover what has happened here." ... Lawyer Friedman did not respond to the above letter. But Friedman did mail me Appellees brief many days later in envelope showing TRUE MAILING date. Certificate of service on received Appellees brief did not reflect postmark date. 10th Cir. R. 25.4 in 1995 page 62 reads Papers not accepted for filing. -- The clerk shall not file papers that do not comply with the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and these rules See 10thCir. R. 42.1 But Tenth Circuit clerks Fisher and Hoecker despite my protests and submission of evidence may have stamped FILED on Sandia's IMPROPERLY SERVED Appellee/Respondent's brief according to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Laywer Friedman FALSIFIED THE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. Friedman DID NOT MAIL ME "Served on 3/27/95." d) Proof of Service; Filing. A paper presented for filing shall contain an acknowledgment of service by the person served or proof of service in the form of a statement of the date and manner of service, of the name of the person served, and of the addresses to which the papers were mailed or at which they were delivered, certified by the person who made service. Proof of service may appear on or be affixed to the papers filed. When a brief or appendix is filed by mailing or dispatch in accordance with Rule 25(a)(2)(B), the proof of service shall also state the date and manner by which the document was mailed or dispatched to the clerk. http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/docs/frap-iop.htm#25a Crime apparently committed by Hoecker and Fisher is § 1017. Government seals wrongfully used and instruments wrongfully sealed Whoever fraudulently or wrongfully affixes or impresses the seal of any department or agency of the United States, to or upon any certificate, instrument, commission, document, or paper or with knowledge of its fraudulent character, with wrongful or fraudulent intent, uses, buys, procures, sells, or transfers to another any such certificate, instrument, commission, document, or paper, to which or upon which said seal has been so fraudulently affixed or impressed, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/1017.shtml Despite my protests of judicial misconduct Judges Moore, Barrett, Weis award decision to Sandia 10/6/95 [890055] Order filed by Judges Moore, Barrett, Weis "...All outstanding motions are denied..." (found in Order & Judgment of 10/6/95) [879579-1] Parties served by mail. (pdw) when these judges should not have had Appellees brief before them. Then in an apparently attempt to conceal what happened 10/6/95 [890076] NOTE: THIS ENTIRE CASE IS SEALED. Terminated on the Merits after Submission Without Oral Hearing; Judgment Affirmed; Written, Signed, Unpublished. Moore, authoring judge; Barrett; Weis. [94-2205] (pdw) I WON MY APPEAL, pro se, ON A TECHNICALITY but judges Judges Moore, Barrett, Weis awarded the win to Sandia Labs! Members of Congress, judicial misconduct in this matter has been well-documented. Court records filed with the Tenth Circuit. But CURRENTLY under seal. Lawyers involved in this matter attempt to use the legal strategy of IGNORE and STONEWALL to attempt to deny me justice. Ignoring and stonewalling by lawyers forced Morales and me to seek visibility so lawyers could no longer ignore and stonewall. Lawyer attitude apparently is that they ignore rules of civil procedure or even the law so long as their actions are invisible to public scrutiny. Visibility was achieved by suing the National Security Agency which revealed even more judicial misconduct http://www.jya.com/whp052898.htm. I would like to settle all matters involved with this unfortunate cyrpto-related matter, which includes criminal violations of the Privacy Act. DOE lawyer Steve Dillingham asked me to prepare a settlement offer in 1994. I wrote a settlement letter May 22, 1994 to Dillingham. Nothing happened. June 11, 1998 I made several modifications to my 1994 settlement letter and sent it e-mail to Robert Nordhaus, Chief Counsel, DOE. I ask that you 1 help with settlement of my six-year-old since I won my appeal at the Tenth Circuit, 2 investigate Tenth Circuit case 94-2205 Payne v. Sandia Corporation, et al to bring the guilty to justice. Sincerely william payne 505 292 7037 I am not reading e-mail http://jya.com/whpfiles.htm http://www.apcatalog.com/cgi-bin/AP?ISBN=0125475705&LOCATION=US&FORM=FORM2 http://www-hto.usc.edu/software/seqaln/doc/html/gfsr.3.html Coauthor Lewis in the above is one of my former MS and PhD students in computer science. http://www.friction-free-economy.com/ Monday 6/22/98 1:04 PM Members of Congress Purpose of this e-mail is to give written proof of criminal judicial misconduct by Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals clerks Hoecker, Fisher, and Judges Anderson, Barrett, Logan and request a congressional investigation. After several years, with Payne, of trying to get Tenth Circuit to send docket sheets from my case, citizen John Young http://www.jya.com/index.htm locates docket sheets and posts them Morales Case Dockets 10th USCA June 12, 1998 on Internet at http://www.jya.com/arm061298.htm. Source: Online records Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals via PACER GENERAL DOCKET FOR Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals Court of Appeals Docket #: 95-2204 Filed: 9/29/95 Nsuit: 3440 Morales v. Sandia National Lab. Appeal from: United States District Court for the District of New Mexico I filed 11/9/95 [898274] Appellant's brief filed by Arthur R. Morales. Original and 2 copies. c/s: y. Served on 11/7/95. Oral argument? pro se. Appellee's brief due 12/11/95 for Sandia National Lab. (pdw) Sandia files its FIRST ATTEMPT at 12/11/95 [905033] Appellee's deficient brief filed by Sandia National Lab.. Appellee's corrected brief due 12/21/95 for Sandia National Lab. additional copies received 12/11/95. (fg) Tenth Circuit court clerk Patrick Fisher writes Wells on December 11, 1995 concerning Sandia's deficient brief [C]orrections, however made, must be accompanied by proof of service upon all other parties to the appeal. ... and issues 12/14/95 [905975] FIRST notice of rules violation for Deborah D. Wells for Appellee Sandia National Lab. (sls) Wells submits 12/21/95 [907974] Appellee's brief filed by Sandia National Lab.. Original and 7 copies. c/s: y. Served on 12/20/95 Oral Argument? n Appellant's optional reply brief due 1/8/96 for Arthur R. Morales (mbm) but DOES NOT serve me with a copy. Wells later admits in 2/1/96 [917660] Response filed by Sandia National Lab. Appellant/Petitioner motion to clarify Original and 3 copies. c/s: y response Null Relief Code (fg) Certificate of Service date 30th day of January, 1996, [h]ad Appellant simply made a phone call to the Tenth Circuit, he could have established that the Defendant-Appellee's corrected brief was indeed filed on a timely basis, ... I protested by filing 1/3/96 [909965] Appellant's motion "for the Court to Grant Appeal" filed by Appellant Arthur R. Morales [95-2204]. Original and 3 copies. c/s: y. (pdw) 1/3/96 [909966] Appellant's motion "for New Trial" filed by Appellant Arthur R. Morales [95-2204]. Original and 3 copies. c/s: y. (pdw) 1/3/96 [909967] Appellant's motion "to Discipline Defendant-Appellee" filed by Appellant Arthur R. Morales [95-2204]. Original and 3 copies. c/s: y. (pdw) because Sandia did not properly serve me in violation of Fisher's December 11, 1995 order. The Tenth Circuit court of appeals should NOT, by its own rules, filed Appellee's brief filed by Sandia National Lab.. Original and 7 copies. c/s: y. Served on 12/20/95 10th Cir. R. 25.4 in 1995 page 62 reads Papers not accepted for filing. -- The clerk shall not file papers that do not comply with the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and these rules See 10thCir. R. 42.1 And is doubtful whether court clerk Fisher had any authority under appellate procedure to permit Wells to correct her deficient brief. Rather Sandia's brief did not comply with with Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and should have been summarily rejected for filing. I WON, pro se, my appeal to the Tenth circuit on a technicality but Judges Anderson, Barrett, Logan awarded the win to Sandia Labs. 4/2/96 [932848] Order filed by Judges Anderson, Barrett, Logan denying parties' motions for general relief(found in Order and Judgment of 4/2/96)--"...During the course of this appeal, the parties have filed various motions for dismissal, summary grant, and sanctions. We find no merit to any of these motions, and they are [920851-1] Parties served by mail. (pdw) by accepting and judging on a documents which was not permitted to be before the court by its own rules. Judicial misconduct in my case has been well-documented as it is in Payne's case. Payne and I speculate that similar judicial misconduct may have occurred at the Tenth Circuit. Sandia lawyer Robert J Park wrote me a settlement letter on Feb 18, 1998. I filled in the blanks and made minor handwritten chages and returned it on February 22, 1998. But my offer has not yet been accepted. I ask that you 1 help have my settlement offer accepted, 2 investigate judicial misconduct in case 95-2204 and punish the guilty. Some citizens can only express such frustrations with the US court system with violence. I seek change by legal reform. Sincerely Arthur R Morales 505 345 1381

1 0

CTIA Daily News from WOW-COM - June 22, 1998
by CTIA Daily News 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

======================================== Welcome to today's edition of the CTIA Daily News from WOW-COM. Please click on the icon for the most important news in wireless communications today. ========================================

1 0

Verisign & NAI Join Forces, PGP out the door?
by Steve Orrin 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

To all: Word is the PGP is being dropped as a standard and NAI converting over to x.509 throughout product line. However the info is vague wnough to mean alot of things:) sorrin NETWORK ASSOCIATES AND VERISIGN PARTNER TO PROVIDE INTEROPERABLE 6/22/98 13:18 Digital Certificate Solutions to Millions of Users Worldwide Partnership Provides Customers Choice of Leading Certificate Formats, Enabling Widespread Secure Internet Business Transactions MOUNTAIN VIEW and SANTA CLARA, Calif., June 22 /PRNewswire/ -- VeriSign, Inc. (Nasdaq: VRSN), and Network Associates (Nasdaq: NETA), today announced a broad reaching partnership to enable cross product support and promotion of each company's digital certificate-based security solutions. This partnership will provide customers with a flexible security solution that encompasses best-of-breed products and technologies -- enabling secure global electronic commerce and business-to-business communications on a larger scale than ever before. With this announcement, Network Associates and VeriSign can tap into the world's largest community of certificate holders made up of over one thousand five hundred enterprises and nearly nine million individuals throughout the world. This integration of the world's leading certificate technologies will enable businesses to utilize their choice of certificate formats while conducting secure Internet transactions such as: exchanging secure e-mail, establishing virtual private networks, and authorized access to confidential corporate data. Network Associates and VeriSign customers will now be able to establish combined PKI solutions covering the complete lifecycle of certificates from issuance and usage through renewal, expiration, or revocation. The first commercial offering from this collaboration will be interoperable between the Gauntlet GVPN product and VeriSign OnSite for IPSEC, which will be available in the third quarter. In the fourth quarter VeriSign's OnSite service and toolkit will be enhanced to issue DSA X.509 certificates in addition to its RSA X.509 certificates, and Network Associates' Net Tools Secure, including their industry leading PGP encryption products, will be updated to request and use either type of certificate. "By joining the two largest players in the industry to ensure that our customers' security applications are seamlessly compatible, we are fueling the growth of electronic commerce and secure communications on the Internet," said Peter Watkins general manager of the Net Tools Secure division at Network Associates. "We are pleased to offer VeriSign as our preferred provider of digital certificate services. Together, we are the only two companies to support the full range of certificate standards -- giving customers the power of choice when implementing their open, certificate-based security solutions." "We are extremely pleased to work with Network Associates to bring enterprise customers a clear best-of-breed solution," said Stratton Sclavos, president and CEO of VeriSign. "With this partnership, users of Network Associates' desktop and server encryption applications can simply obtain their choice of digital certificates to establish a fully functional, interoperable PKI through the use of OnSite." "The announcement from VeriSign and Network Associates is a win-win situation for Information Systems (IS) decision makers," said Jim Hurley, director of information security at Aberdeen Group, a Boston-based IS market-research, consulting and analysis firm. "One supplier helps IS managers by managing risk while the other helps IS managers by enabling safe interconnections with suppliers, partners and customers for mission business-procedures. Interoperable and seamless support between these supplier's products is the kind of partnership that IS executives will reward." VeriSign OnSite, a state of the art digital certificate solution that enables organizations to quickly and easily establish themselves as a certificate authority, is available today for client and server digital certificates and will be available for IPSec digital certificates in the third quarter. VeriSign OnSite pricing begins at $4995 for 1000 client certificates. Network Associates' Net Tools Secure suite is the industry's most comprehensive set of security products encompassing enterprise encryption, authentication, intrusion detection, audit analysis, anti-virus, firewall, global virtual private network and network vulnerability assessment. Net Tools Secure is available now and is priced at $49 per user for 5000 users. Network Associates, Inc. With headquarters in Santa Clara, California, Network Associates, Inc., formed by the merger of McAfee Associates and Network General, is a leading supplier of enterprise network security and management solutions. Network Associates' Net Tools Secure and Net Tools Manager offer best-of-breed, suite-based network security and management solutions. Net Tools Secure and Net Tools Manager suites combine to create Net Tools, which centralizes these point solutions within an easy-to-use, integrated systems management environment. For more information, Network Associates can be reached at 408-988-3832 or on the Internet at http://www.nai.com. VeriSign, Inc. is the leading provider of digital certificate solutions used by enterprises, Web sites and consumers to conduct secure communications and transactions over the Internet and private networks. VeriSign's Digital IDs and Secure Server IDs are available through the company's Web site at http://www.verisign.com. VeriSign's E-Commerce Solutions are used by enterprises to deploy complete Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) solutions for intranets, extranets, and large-scale electronic commerce applications, and are available through VeriSign regional account representatives or through VeriSign resellers. For more information visit VeriSign's Web site at http://www.verisign.com. SOURCE Network Associates, Inc. -0- 06/22/98 /CONTACT: Nathan Tyler of Copithorne & Bellows, 415-975-2223, for Network Associates; or Kelly Ryan of VeriSign, 650-429-3424/ /Company News On-Call: http://www.prnewswire.com or fax, 800-758-5804, ext. 124004/ /Web site: http://www.verisign.com http://www.nai.com/ (NETA VRSN) CO: Network Associates, Inc.; VeriSign, Inc. ST: California IN: CPR MLM SU: PDT -0- (PRN) Jun/22/98 13:03 EOS (PRN) Jun/22/98 13:03 86 -0- (PRN) Jun/22/ 98 13:18

1 0

Entrust goes Public
by Steve Orrin 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> Entrust filed to go public.

1 0

Just for You
by Nicole 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

<HTML><PRE><BODY BGCOLOR="#000000"> Hi... This message is meant for Adults over the age of 21, If you have received this message in error, please delet it now and accept our appologies. I would like to tell of about this great sex site on the web, offering everything you will ever desire. It has live sex chat and a live sex xhow from Amsterdam. Go and check it out. http://www.sex4u.net/ Love Anna

1 0

Blood Sausage -- SPACE ALIENS HIDE MY DRUGS!!!
by Linda Reed--PCC West Campus CSC 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

BloodSausage HogLog - SPACE ALIENS HIDE M DRUGS!!! ___________________________________________________ "The lives of Frank, Gambino, Morel and Serafini ended on the gallows of Montreal's Bordeaux Jail on October 24, 1924. Valentino and Davis had their executions commuted at the last minute." "No one claimed Frank, Gambino and Valentino were among the half-dozen gunmen who ambushed the bank car, but prosecutorn R.L. Calder argued they were still guilty of murder because of the organized nature of the crime." ~Excerpts from "Blood Brothers" by Peter Edwards. MeTheSheeple was glad to learn that these vile, criminal scumbags, fingered by the person who had actually planned and committed the crime, were held accountable for the actions alleged to them by the gang-leader whose life was spared in return for ratting out alleged coconspirators. I was particularly happy because I knew that the same high standards of justice would undoubtedly be applied to the criminal scum within the Canadian Justice System under whose PigSkin Umbrella the Montreal Mobsters ruled the streets and the citizens who walked them. "Testimony at the Frank robbery trial showed that police routinely sipped coffee with hoods and that Montreal's finest had been tipped off to the armoured car hold-up well in advance, but did nothing." Supreme Court of Canada Justice Louise Coderre (with a left-handed frog-tongue over the first 'e') said, "Vice has spread itself across the city with an ugliness that seemed assured of impunity." Rather than bore you with all of the details behind the criminal scumbag PigsWithBadgesAndGuns being also found 'GUILT OF MURDER BECAUSE OF THE ORGANIZED NATURE OF THE CRIME', I will just skip ahead in the book and report on the final outcome of <trumpets blare> JUSTICE <flags fly> in the case of the police and city officials discovered to have greased the wheels of organized crime in their activities of drug dealing, robbery, murder, etc. Hmmm....nope...nada....maybe...nope...nope... Surprise, surprise! It seems that, following the Coderre probe, "nothing happened that seriously threatened the criminals' take. The name of Cadiex Street was changed to de Bullion Street after a New ork play made the old name notorious, but along the same pavement the same crimes continued." Those without my cynical psychological make-up will undoubtedly be able to supply you with reasons as to just why the local citizens felt extremely 'served and protected' when they came to after being mugged and saw the new street signs, however, I will merely take a short break, here, have a good dump, and wipe my butt with yet another page of the Criminal Code of Canada. And Silk Badges..?: "I know who the real public enemies are. But they are men who have the respect of the public; men who wear silk hats, who are apparently of standing in the community." ~1930's Montreal MobBuster, J.J. Penverne (with no frog-licks in his name...) Peter Edwards provides the standard journalistic explaination as to how "The term 'Mafia,' in its truest form, refers only to organized crime in western Sicily." and explains how it has been expanded to encompass any pair of teenagers throwing a rock through a window, as long as one of them has an Italian name. He neglects to explain, as some journalists do, that the word "Mafia" is becoming increasingly generic, now including the 'Lebanese Mafia', the 'Columbian Mafia', etc. *All* journalists, however, seem unable to explain why they continue to avoid naming the continuing organized forces of armed domination over citizens of *all* ethnic groups the 'Government Mafia'... "Blood Brothers" is not the first book to point out that at the heart of the "honoured society of Calabria" lies the concept of "omerta" (with a right-handed strand of spaghetti over the 'a'). Nor is it the first book to fail to point out that omerta's "double code of conduct that set different moral codes for dealings with those inside and outside one's family circle" applies not only to Officially Recognized Criminal ScumBag Organizations, but also to almost every 'gang' larger than a Cult Of One from the PTA to the CIA to the USA. 'Omerta' decrees that when the president of the PTA molests a child, when the head of the CIA commits treason, when the president of the USA declares that US citizens will continue to face imprisonment for exporting the same strength of encryption that their government is sharing with Communist China, that a street somewhere be renamed, while everything else continues on pretty much as before. Don't hold your breath waiting for mainstream journalists to upset the BadAppleCart by referring to the 'PTA Mafia' when they deem that your child should be forced to attend school with a child who can murder them by biting them, while teaching them that you are a dangerous psycho because of your gun ownership; or to the 'FBI Mafia' when they murder a mother and child in attempts to cover their previous unannounced, botched armed assault on a citizen being charged with civil crimes in an attempt to persuade him to invent crimes against his friends, whether they were Jewish or not; or to the 'Government Mafia' when they spend millions of dollars investigating and/or charging Phil Zimmerman, Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, Jim Bell, knowing that the bottomless taxpayer pockets funding their legally unjustified harassment will guarantee at least moderately successful results, even if the end result is dropping the matter when the multi- million dollar stench begins blowing back toward DC. Do not expect mainstream journalists to refer to the 'ASPCA Mafia' when they release a hastily composed 'history' of TruthMongrel as a rabid, sharp-toothed, human baby conniseur, after HeOrShe is cut down by FBI gunfire on Mayonaisse Mountain during attempts to arrest the Author on 'Dog At Large' charges filed by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police in Bienfait, Sask. Silk? We Don't Need No Stinking Silk...: The multi-facted PigsEar WebSites that are increasingly being turned into InterNet Cult of One SilkPurses through the increasingly efficient and powerful shareware digital bread-slicers available to Jane and Joe Sheeple in their quest to serve either God, Mammon, Dog or Mammy, according to their prediliction, have the capacity, if uncensored and uncontrolled, of allowing the individual to rekindle the creative spark of individuality that reminds them that the word 'WE' should only be used by Kings, Priests, and people with tapeworms. People with the ability to think for themselves; people who know that if Timothy McVeigh was really the 'Muenster' that the mainstream media claimed, then he would have been in the 'Adams Family' movie; people who demand to know if Monica Lewinski has a 'bent' pussy; people with conspiring minds, who want to 'snow'; people who are not afraid to stand up and cheer for the Officially Recognized BadGuys on 'Cops' and 'World's Scariest Innocent Bystander Threatening Police Chases'; people watching 'World's Dumbest Criminals' who slap their forehead and say, "I hate it when that happens..." People who read the Bienfait Nutly News.

1 0

CTIA Daily News From WOW-COM - June 22, 1998
by CTIA Daily News 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

======================================== Welcome to today's edition of the CTIA Daily News from WOW-COM. Please click on the icon for the most important news in wireless communications today. ========================================

1 0

Jim Bell Rearrested
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

JY note: The message below has not been authenticated. The writer claimed no knowledge of the arrest at the time I spoke with him, which was after the date and time of the arrest given in the message. It's possible he was withholding the information for publication or by request of confidentiality. The message may be a forgery written after seeing the messages at http://jya.com/jdb062198.htm. The IRS has sent spam concerning Jim Bell before: http://jya.com/irs-spam.htm. From: Anonymous 3 Date: Mon, 22 Jun 1998 23:31:33 EDT To: jya(a)pipeline.com Subject: Jim Bell and anon John: This is [a journalist] whom you called today about Bell. He was arrested at his parents' home in Vancouver Monday about 1:07 a.m. PDT by five federal marshals in two cars. The agents went in with guns drawn and came out with Bell's elderly parents, with whom they talked for a while. A few minutes later, they brought out Jim, who was handcuffed in front, dressed in a blue T- shirt and slacks. He was put in the back of a red Jeep, and then leg chained by an agent. (I tried to ask one of the agents if Jim was going to be taken directly to Tacoma - my assumption - but the agent was a typical marshals service jerk and just told me to stay away.) Jim was in the backseat for about 20 minutes and then two agents came out and drove him away - after one agent accidentally set off the Jeep "wa-wa" siren - ...just as TV arrived. the other three agents remained in the house, looking for "evidence," i assume. I expect him to appear before a federal magistrate in Tacoma tomorrow morning. His federal defender still has not been provided any paper by the govt. so, now yr up to date. on another matter, I was curious abt the anonymous info sent you. i've been trying to get an anon remailer for some time, but have been unsuccessful. got any tips, advice or help?

2 2

Anonymicer
by Alex `Taker` Pircher 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Protect your Privacy for FREE! http://anonymicer.home.ml.org/ (or http://anonymicer.home.pages.de/) * Surf anonymously - http://anonymicer.home.ml.org/ * Send anonymous Emails - http://anonymicer.home.ml.org/email/ * Post anonymous Messages into Newsgroups - http://anonymicer.home.ml.org/news/ Fast - Easy - Free Greetz, Taker pircher(a)informatik.tu-muenchen.de

1 0

CTIA Daily News From WOW-COM
by CTIA Daily News 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

======================================== Welcome to today's edition of the CTIA Daily News from WOW-COM. Please click on the icon for the most important news in wireless communications today. ========================================

1 0

NSA Declassifies Algos
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Thanks to Ed Roback, NIST: http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jun1998/b06231998_bt316-98.html DoD Press Release, June 23, 1998: No. 316-78 IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 23, 1998 (703)695-0192(media) (703)697-5737(public/industry) ENCRYPTION FORMULAS DECLASSIFIED The Department of Defense today announced the decision by the National Security Agency to declassify both the Key Exchange Algorithm and the SKIPJACK encryption algorithm used in the FORTEZZA(tm) personal computer card. FORTEZZA(tm) provides security at the desktop in the Defense Message System and other DoD applications. This marks the first time that the NSA has declassified such information and made it commercially available. This declassification is an essential part of the Department of Defense's efforts to work with commercial industry in developing reasonably priced computer protection products. This declassification decision will enable industry to develop software and smartcard based security products, which are interoperable with FORTEZZA(tm). The availability of such products will enhance the protection of DoD's sensitive but unclassified and critical non-mission communications. The decision to release SKIPJACK (an 80 bit encryption algorithm that is not extensible to higher key lengths) and KEA (a 1024 bit key exchange algorithm) is restricted to these particular algorithms, and does not apply to other classified NSA algorithms. The SKIPJACK and KEA algorithms and their source codes have been declassified pursuant to Executive Order 12958. Vendors interested in obtaining more information on this matter should contact the National Security Agency Public Affairs Office at 301-688-6524. [End] ----- Note: We called NSA Public Affairs who said that more information will be available tomorrow afternoon on NIST's Web site (no specific URL): http://www.nist.gov In the meantime NSA will respond to faxed questions; send to: Vanessa Talieri Office of Public Affairs National Security Agency Fax: 301-497-2844

1 0

PGPdisk for win95/98?
by jkthomson 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Great, so I finally get around to checking PGP's betaweb, and to my amazement, they finally have a beta version of PGPdisk for 95. Too bad it claims that I need to contact a sales rep, and when I follow their link, I get nothing that would really point me in the right direction. Any of you manage to get your hands on a copy? Currently, I am using bestcrypt NP with blowfish. I am a little concerned with this however, As I have never seen a crypto-review of the software, and their website is not too forthcoming with technical details, or known attacks. Does anyone have information (or horror stories) from using bestcrypt? --------------------------------------------------------------- james 'keith' thomson <jkthomson(a)bigfoot.com> ICQ:746241 jkthomson: C181 991A 405C EAFB 2C46 79B5 B1DC DB78 8196 122D http://www.bigfoot.com/~ceildh <keys> at pgp.mit.edu --------------------------------------------------------------- You can lead a man to slaughter, but you can't make him think. ================================================================

2 1

Creating Wealth In America
by unknown＠example.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Creating Wealth in America >From the desk of Robert Allen, The Author of 2 Mega Best-Sellers, Nothing Down and Creating Wealth in America San Diego, California 11:29 P.M. "I can't sleep until I get this off my chest." "I'm extremely frustrated". Odds are that nine out of ten people who receive this letter will discard it without a second thought. Yet, I know that I have discovered a secret that could change your financial life forever! And I'm willing to share it with you for FREE. Do you want to end your money pressures forever? Do you want to double your income? Do you want to build an extra stream of income quickly? If you answered yes, then let me show you how you can begin living your dreams, this year before it's too late. I'll get right to the point. As it says on the letterhead, my name is Robert Allen. I'm famous for my two #1 New York Times best-selling books. Nothing Down and Creating Wealth in America. There are lots of millionaires who credit their success to one of my books or seminars. So when I share this secret with you, I want you to know that I've done my homework. Here it comes. I have discovered what I believe is the perfect home-based business. Although I'm well known for real-estate investment books and seminars, this new business has absolutely nothing to do with real-estate. In fact, it's much easier and far less risky. It involves: -No employees -Little risk -Little start up cash -It's so simple, anyone can do it You could be earning $1,000 a week in as little as 90 days. One person I know went from zero to $3,000 a week in 60 days. That's $150,000 a year extra, hassle-free income! In my 20 years of research, I can honestly say, "I've never seen a faster, easier way to create a stream of income". I know this sounds too good to be true. Frankly, I didn't believe it myself at first. Finally, I agreed to check it out. As a test, I selected a small group of people and introduced them to this incredible opportunity. Almost immediately, many of them started earning profits. Within a week, many were earning incomes of $4,000 per month in net cash flow. Now, some of them are cashing checks for $3,000 a week. And this is just the beginning! Their earning potential could be unlimited! Would you like to learn how to do that? I'd love to show you how. But only if you're interested enough to make one telephone call. The number to call immediately is 1-888-267-4455. It's a 3-minute, 24-hour recorded message. This may be the answer you have been seeking. Warmly, Robert G. Allen P.S. I want to show you how to create extra streams of income quickly, Go to the phone and call now 1-888-267-4455. //

1 0

Re: Verisign & NAI Join Forces, PGP out the door? (fwd)
by Max Inux 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

This is what I was able to find out about the Verisign/NAI partnership. -- Max Inux (MaxInux(a)bigfoot.com) UIN: 207447, http://khercs.chipware.net Strong Cryptography makes the world a safer place- PGP: 0x5CCFCA59 Or Kinky sex makes the world go round- Christie: Your in my sig too ^^ If Cryptography is outlawed, only outlaws will have cryptography ^^ ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 23 Jun 1998 10:22:26 -0700 From: Jon Callas <jon(a)pgp.com> To: Max Inux <maxinux(a)bigfoot.com>, Sean_Paswater(a)nai.com Cc: chip(a)chipware.net, jon(a)pgp.com Subject: Re: Verisign & NAI Join Forces, PGP out the door? (fwd) At 08:10 PM 6/22/98 -0700, Max Inux wrote: Chip and Jon: Chip: Have any insight into this or is this gonna be like the TIS scare w/ Key Escrow? Jon: Since Chip will probably end up asking you or some of the other higher ups if he is unsure, Is there any truth to this story, or is this TIS #2? The tale is true -- it's the *interpretation* that's bogus. PGP is not out the door. PGP will be doing X.509 too. There's not a lot of difference between an X.509 certificate and a PGP key signature. They do the same thing. What you'll be able to do is have Verisign sign your key. The first steps of this are coming this fall -- you'll be able to drop an X.509 cert into your keyring and it will magically transform itself into a PGP key. At first, you'll only be able to use it with TLS (a.k.a. SSL), which is also coming this fall. Jon ----- Jon Callas jon(a)pgp.com CTO, Total Network Security 3965 Freedom Circle Network Associates, Inc. Santa Clara, CA 95054 (408) 346-5860 Fingerprints: D1EC 3C51 FCB1 67F8 4345 4A04 7DF9 C2E6 F129 27A9 (DSS) 665B 797F 37D1 C240 53AC 6D87 3A60 4628 (RSA)

2 1

QANTAS discriminates against Pauline Hanson's One Nation
by Global Web Builders 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Dear One Nation supporter in NSW, Qantas has banned coverage of Pauline Hanson and One Nation from inflight news. Qantas has effectively censored Channel 9's inflight coverage of Australian news and has, in effect, implied that there is something "distasteful" about Mrs Hanson and her political party. The action allegedly follows a complaint by a QANTAS staff member about coverage of Mrs Hanson being offensive to Indonesian passengers on an international flight. Pauline Hanson's political adviser, Mr David Oldfield, said it was "disgraceful, un-Australian activity asking Channel 9 to be political censors on behalf of Qantas. "Everything that is said publicly, people should have the right to judge for themselves whether something matters or doesn't," he said. "But it certainly isn't up to any airline or anyone else to decide that legitimate public debate isn't to be viewed." If you feel rightfully outraged by this act of censorship by Qantas (the Australian Airline) please contact them by email: qantasmedia(a)qantas.com.au I would encourage you to take a moment to express how you feel about this issue. Finally, please note Ansett have not undertaken censorship of this sort. GWB Scott Balson

1 0

Banning privacy: A radical proposal
by Anonymous 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

This came from Yahoo/ZDNet. Mr. Pappas suggests that we just ban anonymity and privacy to "protect the children." Now where have I heard that before? And yet again, the "Ethical Hackers Against Pedophilia" raise their heads, no pun intended. >Banning privacy: A radical proposal > >By Charles Pappas >June 22, 1998 >Yahoo! Internet Life > >Copyright (c) 1998 ZDNet > >Privacy and anonymity are our most cherished tenets of online life. A >need so immense that Marc Rotenberg of the Electronic Privacy >Information Center declared that we might need a kind of Department of >Privacy. He's not alone: 72 percent of surfers think there should be new >laws to protect their privacy. > >It's a radical, 180-degree turn to take, but...what if we're all wrong? >What if this belief that privacy + anonymity = social good has become as >self-destructive and delusional as a drunk who thinks one more scotch >will make him feel better? > >Like Marley's ghost, privacy may be coming back to haunt us. And that >ghost's name is pedophilia. How bad is it? Disguised as a 13-year-old, I >was directly propositioned on AOL in fewer than 10 minutes on each of >six separate attempts. I entered a chat room--usually called something >like "x9x10x11" or even "JonBenet Ramsey" (code words that alert >pedophiles where to swarm)--and waited for the assaults to start. > >Even when I didn't enter a chat room, the offers kept coming in from >pedophiles prowling for victims. One wanted to send me pictures of >himself. Another asked for a phone number. "I want to do my daughter," >one confessed to me. Later, when I searched for their screen names, they >had all disappeared into the anonymous electronic mist. > >AOL monitors kids' chat rooms continuously. (Parents can also set the >AOL software so their children can't use chat rooms.) "We have a >zero-tolerance policy when it comes to anything illegal," assures AOL >spokeswoman Tricia Primrose. "We have about 8,000 monitors scanning up >to 19,000 chat rooms, message boards, member profiles, and other areas. >When we get any kind of complaint, we immediately check it out. And >we're working with the FBI, customs, and other officials." > >It's not just AOL, of course. Child molesters "operate on every avenue >of the Net," says PhotonRain (not his real name) of Ethical Hackers >Against Pedophilia, a group that aids law enforcement in combating child >pornography. "WWW, newsgroups, IRC, ICQ, FTP servers..." > >We already know it's widespread and easy to encounter. But how often >have we heard--and parroted--the party line that problems on the Net >just reflect real-world problems, no more and no less? Holland slays >that sacred lamb: "The amount of pedophilia on the Net is extremely >disproportional to...society as a whole. They hide behind the anonymity >the Net offers. And they are aware of the small odds against being >caught." > >Ruben Rodriguez, director of the Exploited Child unit for the National >Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC), concurs: "The Net is so >anonymous that molesters are very comfortable on it. They can go in and >hunt kids down, and attempt five or six seductions at the same time." > >"Let's face it," says a New York State investigator who requests >anonymity, "the Net's anonymity enables the sickness. In a couple of >hours I could easily get 2,000 pictures if I wanted, including the Baby >Rape series," a popular collection of pedophilia photos whose name is >horrifyingly self-explanatory. > >In recent weeks, U.S. authorities have helped nab 60 online molesters, >while the FBI reports that its 3-year-old Innocent Images >investigation--an online task force identifying predators--has resulted >in 184 convictions. An impressive stat, but less than confidence >inspiring when research suggests the average child molester will have >more than 70 victims throughout his lifetime. > >At the same time we splash sex offenders' names online, our lawmakers >weigh in with proposed privacy law after privacy law. "No one wants to >give up privacy," says NCMEC's Rodriguez, whose organization now runs a >CyberTipline for leads on the sexual exploitation of children. "But what >do you do when your laws and protections are turned against you? >Something's got to give." > >But what? Our conventional wisdom that privacy is worth any risks? Just >touching this petrified opinion will get me slapped with a swastika--but >as philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer said, "All truth passes through three >stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, >it is accepted as being self-evident." > >To be continued--that's for certain. > >Copyright (c) 1998 ZDNet. All rights reserved.

4 3

Skipjack Up
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

John, The files are up, and hopefully all working OK. See http://csrc.nist.gov/encryption/skipjack-kea.htm Ed Roback

1 0

nation's most secretive spy agency
by bill payne 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Wednesday 6/24/98 8:03 AM Glave I am reading http://www.wired.com/news/news/technology/story/13215.html I recevied a motion from US Assistant Attorney Mitchell yesterday in the mail. I haven't read it yet. Mitchell phoned on f 6/19. Mitchell told me she is moving to remand FOIA ALGORITHM request to NSA. I made a copy of the materials I received and sent them to John Young. I attach a copy of Morales and my complaint to the senate judiciary committee. This e-mail explains more about our interest in NSA. VISIBILITY. I do not have much interest in crypto. One of my problems is a REVERSE cyrpto problem. Trying to get people to read my geek books and obscure binary results. I MERELY BUILT CRYPTO DEVICES FOR NSA. And took a poke at NSA for trying to screw-up Sandia/DOE projects with bad crypto algorithm and implementation advice. http://jya.com/da/whpda.htm Especially in http://jya.com/da/whpda.htm#apps NSA has NO SENSE OF HUMOR. Pseudorandom numbers are close enough to crypto that I understand what the crypto people are doing. Morales and I want our money and out of this mess. Best Sincerely http://www.apcatalog.com/cgi-bin/AP?ISBN=0125475705&LOCATION=US&FORM=FORM2 Looks like we succeeded in getting others to read about the gfsr! In fact, Knuth included the gfsr on page 32 of his books series Art of Computer Programming: Vol 2 Seminumerical algorithms. This likely accounts for http://www-hto.usc.edu/software/seqaln/doc/html/gfsr.3.html Coauthor Lewis in the above is one of my former MS and PhD students in computer science. http://www.friction-free-economy.com/ Subject: Judicial Misconduct at Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals Date: Mon, 22 Jun 1998 13:29:01 -0600 From: bill payne <billp(a)nmol.com> To: art morales <armoral(a)sandia.gov>, senator_hatch(a)Hatch.senate.gov, senator(a)thurmond.senate.gov, chuck_grassley(a)grassley.senate.gov, senator_specter(a)specter.senate.gov, senator_thompson(a)thompson.senate.gov, info(a)kyl.senate.gov, senator_dewine(a)dewine.senate.gov, john_ashcroft(a)ashcroft.senate.gov, michigan(a)abraham.senate.gov, senator_leahy(a)leahy.senate.gov, senator(a)kennedy.senate.gov, senator(a)biden.senate.gov, senator_kohl(a)kohl.senate.gov, senator(a)feinstein.senate.gov, russell_feingold(a)feingold.senate.gov, dick(a)durbin.senate.gov, senator(a)torricelli.senate.gov CC: steve dillingham <" Steven.Dillingham"@hq.doe.gov>, Robert Nordhaus <" Robert.Nordhaus"@hq.doe.gov>, mrgall(a)ix.netcom.com, jy(a)jya.com, art morales <armoral(a)sandia.gov>, federico pena <" Federico.F.Pena"@hq.doe.gov>, RJPARK(a)sandia.gov, cypherpunks(a)toad.com, ukcrypto(a)maillist.ox.ac.uk Monday 6/22/98 1:02 PM Senate Judiciary Committee http://www.senate.gov/committee/judiciary.html Republicans Orrin G. Hatch, Utah, Chairman senator_hatch(a)Hatch.senate.gov Strom Thurmond, South Carolina senator(a)thurmond.senate.gov Charles E. Grassley, Iowa chuck_grassley(a)grassley.senate.gov Arlen Specter, Pennsylvania senator_specter(a)specter.senate.gov Fred Thompson, Tennessee senator_thompson(a)thompson.senate.gov Jon Kyl, Arizona info(a)kyl.senate.gov Mike DeWine, Ohio senator_dewine(a)dewine.senate.gov John Ashcroft, Missouri john_ashcroft(a)ashcroft.senate.gov Spencer Abraham, Michigan michigan(a)abraham.senate.gov Jeff Sessions, Alabama Democrats Patrick J. Leahy, Vermont senator_leahy(a)leahy.senate.gov Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts senator(a)kennedy.senate.gov Joseph R.Biden, Jr., Delaware senator(a)biden.senate.gov Herb Kohl, Wisconsin senator_kohl(a)kohl.senate.gov Dianne Feinstein, California senator(a)feinstein.senate.gov Russell D. Feingold, Wisconsin russell_feingold(a)feingold.senate.gov Richard Durbin, Illinois dick(a)durbin.senate.gov Robert Torricelli, New Jersey senator(a)torricelli.senate.gov Purpose of this e-mail is to give written proof of criminal judicial misconduct by Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals clerks Hoecker, Fisher, and Judges Moore, Barrett, Weis and help get this matter settled. Thursday March 30, 1995 I wrote Tenth Circuit clerk Hoecker to request a copy of the docket sheets for case 94-2205 Payne v. Sandia Corporation, et al Hoecker did not answer my letter. On Tuesday March 5,1996 I wrote Judge Lucius D. Bunton to ask his help to get a copy of the docket sheets. No response. On Monday September 23, 1996 Arthur R Morales and I wrote Henry A. Politz, Chief Judge U.S. Court of Appeals - Fifth Circuit to ask his help to get a copy of the docket sheets of my case and Morales Tenth Circuit case 95-2204. Tenth Circuit also refused to send Morales copies of docket sheets for his case. Politz is Bunton's boss. No response. Friday May 30, 1997 I wrote Antonin Scalia to get this help to get a copy of the docket sheets. No response. 5 May 1998 citizen John Young finds docket sheets on Source: PACER, U.S. Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit, 1-800-279-9107 and posts them on Internet at http://jya.com/whp-10usca.htm Docket as of April 10, 1998 0:05 am Proceedings include all events. 94-2205 Payne v. Sandia Corporation, et al shows that I filed my Brief of the Appellant on 2/19/95. 2/23/95 [835344] Appellant's brief filed by William H. Payne. Original and 7 copies. c/s: y. Served on 2/19/95 Oral argument? pro se. Appellee/Respondent's brief due 3/24/95 for Thomas P. Wright, for Robert Surran, for Paul A. Stokes, for Mary J. Stang, for Tommy A. Sellers, for Craig A. Searls, for Albert Narath, for Preston B. Herrington, for Peter S. Hamilton, for Roger L. Hagengruber, for James R. Gosler, for Harold L. Folley, for Robert L. Ewing, for C. William Childers, for Harvey J. Brewster, for Sandia Corporation (mbm) mbm writes "Appellee/Respondent's brief due 3/24/95" Sandia had sent me a copy of its brief by 3/28/96. I filed attached MOTION TO GRANT PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT'S DEMANDS ON BASIS THAT DEFENDANT-APPELLEES FAILED TO FILE BRIEF WITHIN 30 DAYS SPECIFIED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 31 on Tuesday the 28th day of March, 1995 My February 28 MOTION at the Tenth Circuit is filed WITHOUT notice of service logged. 4/4/95 [845484] Appellant's motion filed by Appellant William H. Payne [94-2205] to grant appellant's demands on basis that appellees' failed to file timely brief. Original and 3 copies c/s: y (mbm) In 1995 FRAP 25 (a) stated "[b]riefs shall be deemed filed on the day of mailing if the most expeditious form of delivery by mail, excepting special delivery, is used." FRAP 25 has been changed by 1998 to http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/docs/frap-iop.htm#25a Since I mailed Appellant's motion filed by Appellant William H. Payne [94-2205] to grant appellant's demands on basis that appellees' failed to file timely brief on 3/28/98, it is likely Sandia's lawyer Friedman received it 3/29/95. Tenth Circuit logs 3/30/95 [844759] Appellee's brief filed by Sandia Corporation, Harvey J. Brewster, C. William Childers, Robert L. Ewing, Harold L. Folley, James R. Gosler, Roger L. Hagengruber, Peter S. Hamilton, Preston B. Herrington, Albert Narath, Craig A. Searls, Tommy A. Sellers, Mary J. Stang, Paul A. Stokes, Robert Surran, Thomas P. Wright. Original and 7 copies. c/s: y. Served on 3/27/95 Oral Argument? y (appellant is pro se) Appellant's optional reply brief due 4/13/95 for William H. Payne (mbm) Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure [FRAP] 26 (c) states (c) Additional Time after Service. When a party is required or permitted to act within a prescribed period after service of a paper upon that party, 3 calendar days are added to the prescribed period unless the paper is delivered on the date of service stated in the proof of service. http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/docs/frap-iop.htm#26c While the Tenth Circuit ASSERTS Appellees brief was, in fact, served on 3/27/95 evidence given below points to the brief was served, in fact, on 3/29/95. I allege that Friedman affixed a false date of service to Sandia's brief. I WAS NEVER PROPERLY SERVED. I wrote Wednesday March 29, 1995 Dan Friedman Simons, Cuddy & Friedman Pecos Trail Office Compound 1701 Old Pecos Trail POB 4160 Santa Fe, NM 87502-4160 505-988-4476 505-984-1807 FAX Dear Lawyer Friedman: Today at 14:00 hours I found a green and white about 9x13 inch envelope in our mail box at my home. Mailing label indicated that the envelope came from your firm. CONFIDENTIAL was stamped on the mailing label. I wrote "Received at 14:00 hours on W 3/29/95 with no POSTMARK OR STAMP by W. H. Payne" at the bottom of the envelope. There was no STAMP OR POSTAGE METER LABEL or POSTMARK on the envelope. Therefore, I gave the envelope to US Postal Service supervisor Mel at 14:49 hours today at the Postal Receiving station at 9904 Montgomery, NW in Albuquerque. Mel has a copy of the cover of the envelope with Mel's note written on it. Mel told me the post office was going to return the envelope to your firm for proper mailing. I ask: 1 What did this envelope contain? Please identify the documents precisely. 2 If any Certificates of Service were included in the envelope, then what were the dates affixed to these documents? 3 Who placed this envelope in our mail box? Lawyer Friedman: It appears you missed an important filing date. And are in the process of attempt to correct your failure. But may be using illegitimate methods to conceal your failure. Please respond as soon as possible so that we all may discover what has happened here." ... Lawyer Friedman did not respond to the above letter. But Friedman did mail me Appellees brief many days later in envelope showing TRUE MAILING date. Certificate of service on received Appellees brief did not reflect postmark date. 10th Cir. R. 25.4 in 1995 page 62 reads Papers not accepted for filing. -- The clerk shall not file papers that do not comply with the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and these rules See 10thCir. R. 42.1 But Tenth Circuit clerks Fisher and Hoecker despite my protests and submission of evidence may have stamped FILED on Sandia's IMPROPERLY SERVED Appellee/Respondent's brief according to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Laywer Friedman FALSIFIED THE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. Friedman DID NOT MAIL ME "Served on 3/27/95." d) Proof of Service; Filing. A paper presented for filing shall contain an acknowledgment of service by the person served or proof of service in the form of a statement of the date and manner of service, of the name of the person served, and of the addresses to which the papers were mailed or at which they were delivered, certified by the person who made service. Proof of service may appear on or be affixed to the papers filed. When a brief or appendix is filed by mailing or dispatch in accordance with Rule 25(a)(2)(B), the proof of service shall also state the date and manner by which the document was mailed or dispatched to the clerk. http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/docs/frap-iop.htm#25a Crime apparently committed by Hoecker and Fisher is § 1017. Government seals wrongfully used and instruments wrongfully sealed Whoever fraudulently or wrongfully affixes or impresses the seal of any department or agency of the United States, to or upon any certificate, instrument, commission, document, or paper or with knowledge of its fraudulent character, with wrongful or fraudulent intent, uses, buys, procures, sells, or transfers to another any such certificate, instrument, commission, document, or paper, to which or upon which said seal has been so fraudulently affixed or impressed, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/1017.shtml Despite my protests of judicial misconduct Judges Moore, Barrett, Weis award decision to Sandia 10/6/95 [890055] Order filed by Judges Moore, Barrett, Weis "...All outstanding motions are denied..." (found in Order & Judgment of 10/6/95) [879579-1] Parties served by mail. (pdw) when these judges should not have had Appellees brief before them. Then in an apparently attempt to conceal what happened 10/6/95 [890076] NOTE: THIS ENTIRE CASE IS SEALED. Terminated on the Merits after Submission Without Oral Hearing; Judgment Affirmed; Written, Signed, Unpublished. Moore, authoring judge; Barrett; Weis. [94-2205] (pdw) I WON MY APPEAL, pro se, ON A TECHNICALITY but judges Judges Moore, Barrett, Weis awarded the win to Sandia Labs! Members of Congress, judicial misconduct in this matter has been well-documented. Court records filed with the Tenth Circuit. But CURRENTLY under seal. Lawyers involved in this matter attempt to use the legal strategy of IGNORE and STONEWALL to attempt to deny me justice. Ignoring and stonewalling by lawyers forced Morales and me to seek visibility so lawyers could no longer ignore and stonewall. Lawyer attitude apparently is that they ignore rules of civil procedure or even the law so long as their actions are invisible to public scrutiny. Visibility was achieved by suing the National Security Agency which revealed even more judicial misconduct http://www.jya.com/whp052898.htm. I would like to settle all matters involved with this unfortunate cyrpto-related matter, which includes criminal violations of the Privacy Act. DOE lawyer Steve Dillingham asked me to prepare a settlement offer in 1994. I wrote a settlement letter May 22, 1994 to Dillingham. Nothing happened. June 11, 1998 I made several modifications to my 1994 settlement letter and sent it e-mail to Robert Nordhaus, Chief Counsel, DOE. I ask that you 1 help with settlement of my six-year-old since I won my appeal at the Tenth Circuit, 2 investigate Tenth Circuit case 94-2205 Payne v. Sandia Corporation, et al to bring the guilty to justice. Sincerely william payne 505 292 7037 I am not reading e-mail http://jya.com/whpfiles.htm http://www.apcatalog.com/cgi-bin/AP?ISBN=0125475705&LOCATION=US&FORM=FORM2 http://www-hto.usc.edu/software/seqaln/doc/html/gfsr.3.html Coauthor Lewis in the above is one of my former MS and PhD students in computer science. http://www.friction-free-economy.com/ Monday 6/22/98 1:04 PM Members of Congress Purpose of this e-mail is to give written proof of criminal judicial misconduct by Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals clerks Hoecker, Fisher, and Judges Anderson, Barrett, Logan and request a congressional investigation. After several years, with Payne, of trying to get Tenth Circuit to send docket sheets from my case, citizen John Young http://www.jya.com/index.htm locates docket sheets and posts them Morales Case Dockets 10th USCA June 12, 1998 on Internet at http://www.jya.com/arm061298.htm. Source: Online records Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals via PACER GENERAL DOCKET FOR Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals Court of Appeals Docket #: 95-2204 Filed: 9/29/95 Nsuit: 3440 Morales v. Sandia National Lab. Appeal from: United States District Court for the District of New Mexico I filed 11/9/95 [898274] Appellant's brief filed by Arthur R. Morales. Original and 2 copies. c/s: y. Served on 11/7/95. Oral argument? pro se. Appellee's brief due 12/11/95 for Sandia National Lab. (pdw) Sandia files its FIRST ATTEMPT at 12/11/95 [905033] Appellee's deficient brief filed by Sandia National Lab.. Appellee's corrected brief due 12/21/95 for Sandia National Lab. additional copies received 12/11/95. (fg) Tenth Circuit court clerk Patrick Fisher writes Wells on December 11, 1995 concerning Sandia's deficient brief [C]orrections, however made, must be accompanied by proof of service upon all other parties to the appeal. ... and issues 12/14/95 [905975] FIRST notice of rules violation for Deborah D. Wells for Appellee Sandia National Lab. (sls) Wells submits 12/21/95 [907974] Appellee's brief filed by Sandia National Lab.. Original and 7 copies. c/s: y. Served on 12/20/95 Oral Argument? n Appellant's optional reply brief due 1/8/96 for Arthur R. Morales (mbm) but DOES NOT serve me with a copy. Wells later admits in 2/1/96 [917660] Response filed by Sandia National Lab. Appellant/Petitioner motion to clarify Original and 3 copies. c/s: y response Null Relief Code (fg) Certificate of Service date 30th day of January, 1996, [h]ad Appellant simply made a phone call to the Tenth Circuit, he could have established that the Defendant-Appellee's corrected brief was indeed filed on a timely basis, ... I protested by filing 1/3/96 [909965] Appellant's motion "for the Court to Grant Appeal" filed by Appellant Arthur R. Morales [95-2204]. Original and 3 copies. c/s: y. (pdw) 1/3/96 [909966] Appellant's motion "for New Trial" filed by Appellant Arthur R. Morales [95-2204]. Original and 3 copies. c/s: y. (pdw) 1/3/96 [909967] Appellant's motion "to Discipline Defendant-Appellee" filed by Appellant Arthur R. Morales [95-2204]. Original and 3 copies. c/s: y. (pdw) because Sandia did not properly serve me in violation of Fisher's December 11, 1995 order. The Tenth Circuit court of appeals should NOT, by its own rules, filed Appellee's brief filed by Sandia National Lab.. Original and 7 copies. c/s: y. Served on 12/20/95 10th Cir. R. 25.4 in 1995 page 62 reads Papers not accepted for filing. -- The clerk shall not file papers that do not comply with the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and these rules See 10thCir. R. 42.1 And is doubtful whether court clerk Fisher had any authority under appellate procedure to permit Wells to correct her deficient brief. Rather Sandia's brief did not comply with with Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and should have been summarily rejected for filing. I WON, pro se, my appeal to the Tenth circuit on a technicality but Judges Anderson, Barrett, Logan awarded the win to Sandia Labs. 4/2/96 [932848] Order filed by Judges Anderson, Barrett, Logan denying parties' motions for general relief(found in Order and Judgment of 4/2/96)--"...During the course of this appeal, the parties have filed various motions for dismissal, summary grant, and sanctions. We find no merit to any of these motions, and they are [920851-1] Parties served by mail. (pdw) by accepting and judging on a documents which was not permitted to be before the court by its own rules. Judicial misconduct in my case has been well-documented as it is in Payne's case. Payne and I speculate that similar judicial misconduct may have occurred at the Tenth Circuit. Sandia lawyer Robert J Park wrote me a settlement letter on Feb 18, 1998. I filled in the blanks and made minor handwritten chages and returned it on February 22, 1998. But my offer has not yet been accepted. I ask that you 1 help have my settlement offer accepted, 2 investigate judicial misconduct in case 95-2204 and punish the guilty. Some citizens can only express such frustrations with the US court system with violence. I seek change by legal reform. Sincerely Arthur R Morales 505 345 1381

1 0

New Features @ CNN Custom News
by CustomNews＠INTMAIL.TURNER.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hello and thanks for using CNN Custom News. As part of our commitment to make the best personalized news service even better, CNN and Oracle have recently added two great new features to Custom News at http://cnn.com/CustomNews: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< KEEP AN EYE ON YOUR FAVORITE CATEGORY! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< This latest feature allows you to choose one category that will always appear at the top of your personal picks when you check Custom News. For instance, if U.S.:Government:Presidential is your favorite category, you don't have to go to the U.S. page to see it...put it front and center on your personal homepage. To select your favorite category, visit your Custom Profile page at: http://CustomNews.CNN.com/cnews/pna_cust.customize#Favorite and use the drop down box to make your choice. Push the 'done' button and that's it! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< WE'VE ADDED YET ANOTHER SOURCE: PR NEWSWIRE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< The addition of PR Newswire to Custom News provides even deeper business content and improved tracking of particular companies. The latest press releases are available to you almost as soon as they hit the wire. Now, you'll be able to track even more of the latest news regarding your specific companies of interest! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< WHAT IF I'VE FORGOTTEN MY PASSWORD? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< If you have not used the service in a while or are on a new computer, you may need to enter your user name and password. If you can remember your user name, but forgot your password, the system will prompt you with the reminder message you created at the time of registration. The reminder will appear directly above your login name. If you have forgotten both your user name and password, simply open a new account with our QuickStart Profile option. It's fast and easy to start using CNN Custom News again! Thanks for your time. If you haven't already, come by CNN.com/CustomNews and check out the improved Custom News service. Sincerely, The CNN Custom News Team http://CNN.com/CustomNews ============================================================= If you would rather not receive future updates about Custom News features and events, please go to http://CustomNews.CNN.com/cnews/pna_auth.register and uncheck the "new Custom News features" checkbox. If you cannot access the above page, but would like to be unsubscribed from this list, please go to http://CNN.com/EMAIL/customnews/ and enter your e-mail address. Please DO NOT reply to this e-mail address. CNN Interactive email id:11339101041640714

1 0