December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Re: sysadmin@thegrid.net
by ILovToHack＠aol.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> >> On 13 Aug 1998, HyperReal-Anon wrote: >> >> > > our address that the mail is being sent to is: sysadmin(a)thegrid.net The interesting fact here is that you all seem to have nothing better to do with your time than converse over something so petty as an address error..... I think you need to re-evaluate who the mental midgets are..... I would hope the future of our world isn't in the hands of such petty people such as yourselves... > > > we appreciate your mail but the volume is slightly overwelming for us to >> > > handle.. >> > > sincerely, burke bryant >> > > >> > > >> > >> > Take yourself off, you mental midget. >> >> Come now. Is there any reason to insult midgets by comparing them to >> this guy? :) > >Quite right. Most vertically-challenged individuals are upstanding members >of society and of at least average intelligence. They don't deserve to be >compared to this guy. :) > >I would call him a moron, but then I'd be insulting morons. > Come on thake it easy on the guy at least he aint on AOL or somthing stuped.

1 0

Re: your mail
by HyperReal-Anon 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On Thu, 13 Aug 1998, Entropy wrote: > > At 06:37 PM 8/13/98 -0700, you wrote: > > > >> On 13 Aug 1998, HyperReal-Anon wrote: > >> > >> > > our address that the mail is being sent to is: sysadmin(a)thegrid.net > The interesting fact here is that you all seem to have nothing better to do > with your time than converse over something so petty as an address error..... > I think you need to re-evaluate who the mental midgets are..... > I would hope the future of our world isn't in the hands of such petty > people such as yourselves... > > It's more like making an example out of yet another moron who doesn't have a clue where to send. You're tempting because you advertise that you're a sysadmin. I'll remember to never do business with your company.

1 0

Own a complete adult site for $19.95
by reply＠adultcontent4u.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Want to Make Money on the Internet? Start Your Own ADULT WEB SITE for only $19.95... with Quik Site! * We supply Hosting and Credit Card Processing. * We supply Content... Nothing to Set-Up or Upload. * We give you High Quality Video Feeds! * Hot Chatroom for your Site! * We give you Original Photos featuring Gorgeous Models! * We do all the Work... YOU MAKE THE MONEY! Design your own Adult Site online in 10 Minutes and START MAKING MONEY TONIGHT! Absolutely NO OTHER CHARGES involved in making these sites! http://www.adultsiteservices.com/cquiksite If you would like to be removed from this list please send a message to: remove(a)adultcontent4u.com and put the word REMOVE in the SUBJECT

1 0

Now is the Time! National Credit Card Accounts!
by fiy46＠werker.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

<A HREF="http://www.remove-list.com/">Click here to be removed from future mailing</A> NO CREDIT TURN-DOWNS Now you can accept Credit Card Payment On Your Website - Do you sell a product or service? - Would you like to sell anything on the Internet? 98% of all internet sales are made with Credit Cards Call 1-800-899-2218 - You can process credit cards right from your computer - Funds are directly deposited into your checking account 24 - 48 hours from the time of purchase!! Now that is FAST Did you know, Internet shopping is DOUBLING every 100 days You see, there are really only 2 types of people on the internet, those who spend money, and those who make money. WHICH CATEGORY WILL YOU BE IN ???? Call 1-800-899-2218 GET YOUR MERCHANT ACCOUNT TODAY!!! <HTML><PRE><BODY BGCOLOR="#80ffff"><a href="http://www.remove-list.com/">Click here to be removed from future mailing</A> NO CREDIT TURN-DOWNS Now you can accept Credit Card Payment On Your Website - Do you sell a product or service? - Would you like to sell anything on the Internet? 98% of all internet sales are made with Credit Cards Call 1-800-899-2218 - You can process credit cards right from your computer - Funds are directly deposited into your checking account 24 - 48 hours from the time of purchase!! Now that is FAST Did you know, Internet shopping is DOUBLING every 100 days You see, there are really only 2 types of people on the internet, those who spend money, and those who make money. WHICH CATEGORY WILL YOU BE IN ???? Call 1-800-899-2218 GET YOUR MERCHANT ACCOUNT TODAY!!! </PRE></HTML> Thank You

1 0

Dennis Rodman hounded by porn stars/Mom dates alien son http://stuffed.net/98/8/14/
by STUFFED/EUREKA! 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Welcome to today's issue of Stuffed. To read it you should click on the URL below. If it is not made clickable by your email program you will need to use your mouse to highlight the line, copy it and then paste it into your browser (then press Return). http://stuffed.net/98/8/14/ If you have an email program that can display web pages you will find today's front cover should have already been disp- layed and can be clicked on to take you straight to Stuffed. This email is never sent unsolicited. Stuffed is the supplement for the Eureka newsletter you subscribed to. Full instructions on unsubscribing are in every issue of Eureka!

1 0

No Subject
by Anonymous 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

CLINTON/STARR SCRAMBLED Wed Aug 12 1998 23:34:51 UTC-- An extraordinary communications security blanket will be in place for President Clinton's grand jury showdown on Monday. One of the hottest telecasts in American history will be scrambled with the latest encryption technology and put on a special fiber-optic line from the White House to the courtroom, the DALLAS MORNING NEWS reports in Thursday editions. Hacker beware: Intercepting the president's testimony could fall under wiretapping statutes as a felony, reports the paper. Tech workers, claiming to be from a Virginia cable company, visited the federal courthouse early week. One court watcher explains that the cover didn't work: "It was obvious that the guys were not with 'Virginia Cable' but were from the FBI or some other government agency... setting it all up." Starr is expected to personally question Clinton during the session... "[T]errorists are the only true avant-garde artists because they're the only ones who are still capable of really surprising people." (Delillo q.v. Laurie Anderson 1994: 222)

1 0

CTIA Daily News from WOW-COM - August 14, 1998
by CTIA Daily News 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

========================================== Welcome to today's edition of the CTIA Daily News from WOW-COM. Please click on the icon / attachment for the most important news in wireless communications today. If you cannot open the icon/attachment, please visit http://www.wow-com.com/professional/ for the wireless daily news. Don't miss the major conference on implementing Phase 2 of the E-911 requirement--August 26-27 in San Francisco. For more information, click http://www.wow-com.com/pdf/locntech.pdf ===========================================

1 0

Sandia Scraps Guided Nuclear Bomb Project
by bill payne 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Friday 8/14/98 11:21 AM J Orlin Grabbe http://www.aci.net/kalliste/ The ABQ JOURNAL f 8/14,1998 front page article Sandia Scraps Guided Nuclear Bomb Project Lab Says Design Work Was Just an Exercise By John Fleck Journal Staff Writer Sandia National Laboratories has shut down an effort to design a guided nuclear bomb that critics say was aimed at Third World targets. Sandia pulled the plug because of controversy over the fact that the lab never received permission for the project from senior levels of the Clinton administration, said Sandia vice president Roger Hagengruber. ... is interesting from another standpoint. Article ends with "We have no plans to resurrect the program in fiscal year '99 or any year beyond that," said Sandia spokesman Larry Perrine. Perrine is now married to Renea Dietz of the former Sandia President Al Narth and then Lockheed Martin VP notoriety. I attach Friday November 15, 1996 14:01 Ms. GayLa D. Sessoms, Director FOAI/Privacy Act Division Office of the Executive Secretariat The Secretary of Energy United States Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 Here they are PERRINE,LARRY G. (505)845-8511 LGPERRI (505)844-1392 0167 PERRINE,RENAE J. (505)284-2824 RJPERRI (505)844-6953 0724 http://www.sandia.gov/cgi-bin/emplloc?ename=perrine I received a profane phone call from Larry and Renea Perrine after our letter to Sessoms hit the Infobhan. I recorded it, of course. Narath's third wife is still on the Sandia payroll NARATH,SHANNA S. (505)284-2198 SSNARAT (505)844-6501 0168 http://www.sandia.gov/cgi-bin/emplloc?ename=narath Morales knows Perrine fairly well. Morales told me he had Perrine USED TO have lunch together. Orlin, it appears you have correctly measured the capabilities of SOME OF those running this county. http://www.aci.net/kalliste/apocalyp.htm Perhaps it is time to GET RID OF THEM and settle this UNFORTUNATE MATTER, of course. Later bill For all of our recollection Friday 8/14/98 9:06 AM John Young http://www.jya.com/index.htm J Orlin Grabbe http://www.aci.net/kalliste/ Roger Hagengruber is making news http://www.abqjournal.com/scitech/1sci8-14.htm Hagengruber 1 was Jim Durham's office mate when Hagengruber was new at Sandia. H. B. Durham who served as project leader http://jya.com/da/whpda.htm 2 was C William Childers' boss 3 was James Gosler's boSs 4 was Paul Stokes' boss Originator: Paul A. Stokes Date: 4/28/92 http://jya.com/da/whpda.htm 5 encouraged Sandia to do more 'work for others' projects like for the FBI and NSA. This includes the 'spiking work' for NSA. http://www.aci.net/kalliste/ricono.htm http://www.qainfo.se/~lb/crypto_ag.htm http://caq.com/cryptogate 6 told employees that Hagengruber favored shifting Sandia labs from DOE control to DOD control. 7 was one of the main people involved in getting me fired and CAUSING THIS MESS. http://www.aci.net/kalliste/speccoll.htm http://www.aci.net/kalliste/nukearse.htm http://www.aci.net/kalliste/sandcryp.htm http://jya.com/whpfiles.htm 8 Hagengruber looks like he may have relative working at Sandia HAGENGRUBER,MICHAEL L. (505)844-0628 MLHAGEN (505)844-7284 0121 HAGENGRUBER,ROGER L. (505)844-7310 RLHAGEN (505)844-1424 1231 http://www.sandia.gov/cgi-bin/emplloc?ename=hagengruber This matter CLEARLY should be settled before it GETS WORSE! Later bill For all of our recollection Friday 8/14/98 9:06 AM John Young http://www.jya.com/index.htm J Orlin Grabbe http://www.aci.net/kalliste/ Roger Hagengruber is making news http://www.abqjournal.com/scitech/1sci8-14.htm Hagengruber 1 was Jim Durham's office mate when Hagengruber was new at Sandia. H. B. Durham who served as project leader http://jya.com/da/whpda.htm 2 was C William Childers' boss 3 was James Gosler's boSs 4 was Paul Stokes' boss Originator: Paul A. Stokes Date: 4/28/92 http://jya.com/da/whpda.htm 5 encouraged Sandia to do more 'work for others' projects like for the FBI and NSA. This includes the 'spiking work' for NSA. http://www.aci.net/kalliste/ricono.htm http://www.qainfo.se/~lb/crypto_ag.htm http://caq.com/cryptogate 6 told employees that Hagengruber favored shifting Sandia labs from DOE control to DOD control. 7 was one of the main people involved in getting me fired and CAUSING THIS MESS. http://www.aci.net/kalliste/speccoll.htm http://www.aci.net/kalliste/nukearse.htm http://www.aci.net/kalliste/sandcryp.htm http://jya.com/whpfiles.htm 8 Hagengruber looks like he may have relative working at Sandia HAGENGRUBER,MICHAEL L. (505)844-0628 MLHAGEN (505)844-7284 0121 HAGENGRUBER,ROGER L. (505)844-7310 RLHAGEN (505)844-1424 1231 http://www.sandia.gov/cgi-bin/emplloc?ename=hagengruber This matter CLEARLY should be settled before it GETS WORSE! Later bill Friday November 15, 1996 14:01 Ms. GayLa D. Sessoms, Director FOAI/Privacy Act Division Office of the Executive Secretariat The Secretary of Energy United States Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 Dear Ms Sessoms: Purposes of this letter are; 1 a have the Department of Energy deliver lawfully requested information due us under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) o legal bills o military double-dipper employees o husband/wife employees o Sandia president Al Narath's use of taxpayer money to fund Narath's sex life at Sandia Labs. b show that we have exhausted all administrative remedies in our attempt to obtain this information, 2 reason with you as to the futility of DOE's attempt to resist our lawful inquiries, 3 and set a time for our filing our lawful, disruptive, expensive, damaging FOIA lawsuit if, of course, DOE is un-swayed by logic. October 25 you wrote, Thank you for your October 2, 1996, correspondence addressed to Secretary O'Leary. In you letter you requested the following information under the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act: 1. Names, dates of employment, current salaries of all husband/wife combinations who work at Sandia Laboratories as of December 5, 1995; and 2. Names, dates of employment, current salaries of all husband/wife combinations who work at DOE/ALOO Laboratories as of December 5, 1995. You go on to state, Pursuant to 10 CFR 1004.8, the adequacy of this search for responsive documents may be appealed to the Director of Hearings and Appeals, HG-1, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20585-0107. Please include a concise statement of the grounds for the appeal, a description of the relief sought, and attach a copy of this correspondence. The appeal to the Director must be made within 30 calendar days after your receipt of this letter. ... Our October 2 letter stated, to appeal a denial of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request; Ms Sessoms, our October 2 letter was an APPEAL directed to Energy Secretary. NOT a FOIA. And, we can appeal to the Secretary of Energy, not the Director of Hearings and Appeals, as you direct. Whenever a FOIA request is denied, the agency must inform the requester of the reasons for the denial and the requester's right to appeal the denial to the head of the agency. [FOIA GUIDE Congressional and Administrative News, September 1989] Ms Sessoms, you appear to want us to appeal an APPEAL. The above arguments we believe satisfies purpose 1b. We have exhausted all administrative remedies. You attempt to justify not giving us documents DOE apparently has in its possession regarding husband/wife employees with the argument, The Department of Energy (DOE) maintains the Pay/Pers Payroll System which contains employment related data for all DOE employees. However, the system does not cross reference or otherwise identify employees married to one another. Therefore, we are unable to provide the information responsible to your request. But there are OTHER documents which apparently DO contain reference to employees married to one another, we are told. But this leads to purpose 2: husband/wife employees. Let's look at reason we are requesting these documents, On Tuesday December 12, 1995 09:44 Payne wrote, During this time of corporate down-sizing many Americans are losing their jobs, perhaps even their homes as a result. Americans are sensitive, especially in these times, to those abuse the government system for personal financial profit. DOE has refused to release the number and names of retired military double-dippers who work at Sandia and Los Alamos. Like Sandia ethics director and retired general Jack Dickey. Equally offensive to military double-dippers in time of shrinking employment are husband/wife combinations both employed by DOE, Sandia, and Los Alamos. This is especially true if there are some improprieties involved in employment and promotions. And our October 2, 1996 contains the information, Wednesday September 28 Payne received a letter containing more information about husband/wife. In summary, 1 Harry and Delores Season Harry was a high-level ALOO employee (assistant manager?) Delores is a GS-14. Harry recently retired and went to work for Sandia National Laboratories! 2 Tim and Brenda Harmeson Brenda is Acting Manager, KAO (Gm-15). Tim is a staff person at ALOO, likely a GS-13. 3 Mike Zamorski and Phyllis Romero Mike is Acting Deputy Manager, KAO. Phyllis recently left DOE employment. 4 Ron and Gloria O'Dowd Ron is a GM-15 supervisory attorney at ALOO. O'Dowd reports to DOE/ALOO chief counsel Tyler Przybylek. O'Dowd processes FOIA requests. Like the one Payne is appealing in this letter. Gloria also works at DOE/ALOO. 5 Rush and Gloria Inlow DOE AL News, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ALBUQUERQUE OPERATIONS OFFICE, Aug 23, 1996 reports, Rush Inlow will serve as AL's Deputy Manager Energy Secretary Hazel O'Leary has announced that Rush Inlow will become Deputy Manager of the Albuquerque Operations Office on Aug. 25. Inlow replaced James W. Culpepper, who retired May 1, 1996 and Tyler Przybylek, who has served as acting Deputy Manager in the interim. Letter Payne received on September 28 said that Gloria inlow is retiring September 30, 1996. Gloria Inlow apparently expressed resentment that she was MADE to retire because it was a conflict of interest for her to work for her husband, Rush Inlow. Inlows' estimated yearly income is in excess of $200,000. Gloria inlow is apparently going to come back to work a KAO as a contractor employee! Secretary O'Leary, it sounds as if your newly appointed Deputy Manager, Rush Inlow, is attempting to subvert nepotism rules. Purpose 2: military double-dippers. Payne wrote, Retired military personnel are going to work for Sandia National Laboratories. Not only do these individuals draw generous military retirement pay but they have a large income from Sandia. They are government "double dippers." Retired military who do not work for Sandia observe that almost all those retired military hired by Sandia were administrators in the military. Not technical military workers. Code of Ethics & Standards of Conduct of Sandia National Laboratories, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation states, "The perception of impropriety by Sandians can be as damaging to Sandia as would be the commission of the perceived offense." "Refrain from offering or providing Government personnel with improper gratuities, ...", "Carefully avoid any situation which will compromise Sandia's competitive position or result in a potential conflict of interest." page 5. Perhaps giving retired military high-paying jobs while double dipping from the government might be considered an improper gratuity? And influence-buying with the military might be considered a conflict of interest? If it were the case that Sandia was influence-buying with the military instead of hiring the most capable individuals, then this would be a matter of national security concern. Los Alamos National Laboratories rejection letter is dated SEP 29 1995. It reads, This letter is the final response to your September 12, 1995, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for the following information: "Names and date of employment of all retired military personnel who were hired by Los Alamos National Laboratory between the dated of October 1, 1979, and September 12, 1995." The Office of Public Affairs, Albuquerque Operations Office, contacted the Los Alamos Area Office (LAAO) about your request. The LLAO states that the records you are seeking are contained in personnel files in the possession and control of the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), and are therefore, not 'agency records' subject to provision of the FOIA. 'Agency records' are defined as records in federal agencies' possession and control at the time of the FOIA request. However, pursuant to U.S. Department of Energy policy, records in the possession such as LANL, will be made available by DOE when the contract specifically provides that such records are the property of the Government. The contract between the DOE and LANL, managed by the University of California, clearly defines personnel files such as requested by you as being the property of the contractor. Accordingly, these records are not subject to release under DOE policy as well. DOE rejection letter dated August 21 by David L. Geary, signing for Elva Barfield, states, The SNL, through the Kirtland Area Office, has advised they don't have any existing records that identify retired military personnel. Therefore, there are no responsive records to your request." Not only this this statement false, it smacks of a cover-up of misconduct. Records in Sandia's personnel office list previous employment. On Wednesday August 23, 1995 06:29 I faxed Tom Carpenter of the Government Accountability Project, Sandia Lab News, August 18, 1995, page 8 reported with a picture of Dickey, "(Sandia's ethics director [Jack Dickey] and retired air force brigadier general, ..." Ethics director Dickey is identified by the Lab News as a double-dipper. Perhaps the Lab News is trying to blow the whistle again? My FOIA denial appears to be a MAJOR COVER UP of impropriety at Sandia. I will appeal, of course. Not only is Sandia's hiring retired military personnel probably improper but may be an attempt to undermine the Department of Energy's control of the National Laboratories through "Work for Others" programs. August 28, 1995 Payne appeals the above FOIA rejections to Hazel R. O'Leary. The military double-dipper information is withheld despite O'Leary's statement, Secretary O'Leary acknowledged that a DOE refusal to provide documents in response to a Freedom of Information Act request that is clearly within the law was "INEXCUSABLE. [DOE review, Vol 1.1, March '94] Ms Sessoms, we believe that DOE, Sandia, and Los Alamos HAVE RECORDS of military double-dipper. We HAVE a document published by Lockheed Martin showing that the Department of Defense (DOD) REQUIRES reporting military double-dippers to DOD! And we will present this document and other to the court showings that DOE, Sandia, and Los Alamos statements about NOT POSSESSING military double-dipper records IS A LIE. If necessary, of course. Purpose 2: legal bills. February 1, 1996 Payne writes Charles Przybylek, Chief Counsel, U. S. Department of Energy, Albuquerque Operations Office (ALOO), A Freedom of Information Act rejection letter dated January 24, 1996 for, All invoices submitted to Sandia National Laboratories defending against Morales' lawsuit between May 1, 1991 and August 1, 1995. and invoices submitted to Sandia National Laboratories by the law firm of Simons, Cuddy and Friedman between March 1, 1994 and June 1, 1995. appears to be written by a lawyer. But the letter was signed by Freedom of Information Officer, Elva Ann Barfield. The reason Barfield appears not to have written this letter is that DOE employees Elva Barfield and Gwen Schreiner of the Albuquerque Operations office and senior attorney Ann Augustyn of DOE Hearing and appeals forced Sandia to reveal that Friedman collected over $120,000 from about January 1, 1993 until March 1, 1994 defending against my lawsuit. And I are currently attempting to obtain the remainder of Friedman's bills. The total paid to Friedman to defend against my lawsuit is estimated to be $250,000 December 13, 1994 DOE/AL FOIA officer Gwen Schreiner waived fees for the reason, We have considered your request and have determined that release of the requested records is in the public interest, that disclosure of this information is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of the operations or activities of the government, that you or the organization you represent have little or no commercial interest in the material contained in the records, that you or the organization you represent have the qualifications and ability to use and disseminate the information, and that the records are not currently in the public domain. A waiver of fees is therefore granted. Morales lawsuits cost Sandia/DOE far more than mine. Morales has been in a court trial at least once. I have never been to court, even for your spending about $250,000! ... Gar Alperowitz in, The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb and the architecture of an American myth, Alfred Knopf, 1995 writes, As modern disclosures ordered by Energy Secretary Hazel O'Leary concerning human radiation experiments suggest such classification provision helped foster a climate in which government officials were virtually exempt from public accountability", page 614. Now it appears that DOE\ALOO and Sandia Labs attempts to conceal the amount of money both spent on lawyers. ... But now in the rejection of the request for the remainder of the legal bills dated January 24, DOE has changed its mind about further release of legal bill information. Although you intended use of the records in more consistent with a determination that you are a "commercial use" requester, we have decided to process your request as an "all other requester" (please refer to my letter to you dated August 1, 1995) which entitles you to two hours of search time and the first one hundred page of reproduction free of charge per request. In your request you ask you be contacted before processing your requests if there would be any fees for searching for or copying the requested records. This office has been advised by the Kirtland Area Office and the Sandia National Laboratories/New Mexico of the estimated charges for the processing of your requests. The total estimated charges for both requests (95-139-B and 95-175-C) are between $100 and $500. Before we can continue to process your request, we must have your agreement to pay the fees associated with the search and production of the documents. If you wish to modify your requests to reduce the amount of anticipated fees, please advise the office in writing by February 7, 1996. If you do not hear from you by February 7, 1996, we will consider your request withdrawn and will close the files. Wednesday February 28, 1996 we warn Przybylek of an impending lawsuit if the legal bill documents are not forthcoming. Dear lawyer Przybylek: You wrote me on FEB 21. Most of the contents of your letter were false, ambiguous, or misrepresented the facts. Purpose of this letter is to correct your letter, clarify ambiguities and misrepresentations, and convince you and others that we WILL sue ... You wrote, Reference is made to your February 1, 1996 letter to me concerning your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests seeking law firm invoice submitted to Sandia National Laboratories. Sandia National Laboratories is managed and operated for the Department of Energy by Lockheed/Martin, so I assume that you are seeking invoices submitted to that organization. Specifically, you stated that you are seeking invoices submitted to Lockheed/Martin in defense of the Morales lawsuit (Garcia/Morales) and all invoices submitted to Lockheed/Martin by the law firm of Simons, Cuddy and Friedman between March 12, 1994 and June 1, 1995. Contents of these two paragraphs are FALSE. I wrote Elva Barfield on Friday July 28, 1995, 1 All invoices submitted to Sandia National Laboratories by all law firms defending Sandia against Morales' lawsuit between May 1, 1991 and August 1, 1995. Your FALSIFICATIONS include: 1 The starting date IS May 1, 1991, NOT March 12, 1994. 2 I specified "all law firms" NOT JUST Simons, Cuddy and Friedman. 3 I DID NOT specify just Lockheed/Martin. You wrote next, Although such invoiced have been held to be exempt from public release under the provisions of the FOIA because they constitute attorney work-product under exemption 5, (The Rio Grande Sun, Case KFA-0090), the name of the law firm submitting such invoice and the total amount of the invoice has been released as a matter of policy of the DOE General Counsel. Therefore, I am treating your letter to me as a request for this information under that policy. Your above paragraph is nonsense. Exemption 5 - Internal Government Communications The FOIA's fifth exemption applies to internal government documents. An example is a letter from one government department to another about a joint decision that has not yet been made. Another example is a memorandum from an agency employee to his supervisor describing options for conducting the agency's business. The purpose of the fifth exemption is to safeguard the deliberative policy making process of government. The exemption encourages frank discussion of policy matter between agency officials by allowing supporting documents to be withheld from public disclosure. The exemption also protects against premature disclosure of policies before final adoption. [FIRST REPORT By The COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS, 1993] So, lawyer Przybylek, your conclusion about exempting legal bills from the FOIA using exemption 5 is incorrect. You cannot use exemption 5 to attempt to cover up taxpayer money misspent on legal bills. ... You wrote, Although our figures are not broken down by the dates you have referenced, I am providing the following information. The total amount of invoices submitted in the Garcia/Morales litigation as of December 31, 1995, was $567,137.00. Morales feels that this amount is too low. Morales points out that you did not include bills from the law firm of, 1 Rodey, Richardson, Sloan, Akin, and Robb between the dates of January 1, 1991 and January 29, 1993. Nor did you include bills from the law firm of, 2 Butt, Thornton, Baehr, and the law firm of, 3 Fenwick and West in California, so we guess that the amount is near DOUBLE the approximate $570,000 you write. More than $1,000,00! These records are obtained from the docket sheet. You wrote, The total amount of invoices submitted by the Simons, Cuddy, and Friedman law firm in the case of Payne v. Sandia Corp., et al was $108,341.00 as of December 31, 1995. ... So the total is more than $228,000! Legal bills sum of $228,000, of course, is absurd considering we have NEVER been to trial! ... Morales and I have cost DOE more than $1,000,000 in legal bills. Perhaps double this number! Ms Sessoms, we FOIAed Przybylek again for legal bill information. We did not receive any response to our FOIA. Ms. Sessoms, we feel that we have exhausted all of the administrative remedies available to us to obtain legal bill information. Purpose 2: Sandia president Al Narath's use of taxpayer money to fund Narath's sex life at Sandia Labs. October 30, 1996 I appealed to Hazel R. O'Leary, Dear Secretary O'Leary: Purposes of this letter is to appeal a denial of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. DOE FOIA request denial appeals, according to law, can be made to you. October 10, 1996 Michael Conley wrote, Dear Dr. Payne: This is in response to the above-referenced requests in which you sought (1) " Copies of reports of misconduct by Al Narath made by DOE's IG or other office between January 11, 1993 and November 27, 1995" and (2)"Any reports containing the name of William Payne, Bill Payne, etc. between January 11, 1993 and November November 27, 1995." With respect to you request (1) cited above, the Office of Inspector General neither confirms nor denies the existence of records responsive to you request. Lack an individual's consent, and official acknowledgment of an investigation, or an overriding public interest, even to acknowledge the existence of such pertaining to an individual could be reasonably be expected to constitute and unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Refer to 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(7)(C). With respect to you request (2) cited above, we would note that our records do contain responses by the Office of Inspector General to you regarding your previous Freedom of Information Act requests, numbers 93120302 and 951221001. In addition, the Office of Investigations, Office of Inspector General, will be responding to your request (2) as part of its response to your FOIA request number 95112002. This decision may be appealed with 30 calendar days of your receipt of this determination pursuant to 10 C.F.R. 1004.8. Appeals should be addressed to the: Director Office of Hearing and Appeals Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave, SW Washington, D.C. 20595 Thereafter, judicial review will be available to you in the federal district court either (1) in the district where you reside, (2) where you have your principal place of business, (3) where the Department's records are situated or (4) in the District of Columbia. Sincerely, Michael W. Conley Deputy Inspector General for Inspections Office of Inspector General. I appeal this denial. Sandia president Al Narath was apprehended in an act of sexual penetration with his administrative assistant, Renea Dietz in about 1992. Narath lost his security clearances, briefly, over this incident. Narath's second wife, Barbara, also divorced Narath, in part, over this incident. Dietz was promoted to an administrative position at Sandia. Shanna Lindeman divorced her husband. Lindeman was appointed to a division supervisor position at Sandia. Lindeman was the only employee in her division. Narath and Lindeman later married in Carmel, California. Lindeman has apparently not completed college but is reported to make about $120,000 per year at Sandia. Narath was reported changing the locks on his Sandia office. But this did not prevent Sandia security from apparently apprehending Narath with five nude women in his office. Mr. Ray Armenta, Equal Employment Opportunities Commission employee, confirmed this above incident. Apparently Narath was apprehended on the final weekend of his employment at Sandia in an act of sexual penetration with another employee in his Sandia office. Narath moved on to his new job as a Vice President of Lockheed Martin in charge of DOE Energy and Environment projects, Lockheed Martin, TODAY, August 1996 reports. Conley's statement, "even to acknowledge the existence of such pertaining to an individual could be reasonably be expected to constitute and unwarranted invasion of personal privacy" is clearly in error. Narath's sex life at Sandia not only public but financed by taxpayer money. ... Ms Sessoms, IG official Conley is apparently unaware of the Vaughn Index or is attempting to deceive us. DOE MUST acknowledge existence of documents even if it wishes to withhold those documents for reason of FOIA exemption. Vaughn Index A distinguishing feature of FOIA litigation is that the defendant agency bears the burden of sustaining its action of withholding records. So, Ms. Sessoms, Conley is disobeying the law by failure to acknowledge existence of investigations reports of Narath. Purpose 4: Time limits for lawsuit. Ms Sessoms, O'Leary STATED in her celebrated whistleblower speech, I commit to promoting openness and I think one way I do this is being open myself. ... There is one final piece, ... measure results. Don't ever measure what anybody says, measure what is done ... And when we haven't done it well or completely or correctly we can come back and adjust, I expect you be to on me. We are. Morales and Payne have always felt the settlement of disputes is preferable to litigation. It's impossible to know how much the DOE spends combating whistleblowers at its 15 weapons plants across the country, but it's safe to say that Hanford's tab alone is upwards of several million dollars annually. One significant drain on the taxpayer's pocketbook is the DOE's practice of paying 100 percent of the legal expenses its contractors incur in fighting whistleblower lawsuits, regardless of the merits of the case. This encourages contractors to hire the most expensive lawyers and to continue litigation even when settlement would be cheaper." Michael O'Rourke, Cascadia Times, July 1995, page 10. We do not wish for DOE to further waste the taxpayers money. BUT if we do not have settlement or the lawfully requested documents, THEN we will file our expensive, disruptive, public, damaging lawsuit on December 20. If you have evidence that we have NOT exhausted all administrative remedies within the DOE, then we ask you to submit this to us by Friday December 1. Otherwise, we take no response as evidence that all administrative remedies have been exhausted. Sincerely, William H. Payne Arthur R. Morales 13015 Calle de Sandias NE 1024 LosArboles NW Albuquerque, NM 87111 Albuquerque, NM 87107

1 0

Who is who
by tnet1＠prodigy.net 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

This is a responsible email being sent by AC Enterprises. 1055 Stewart Ave., Bethpage , NY 11714. Tel. (516) 937-9001. Email tnet1(a)prodigy.net. The above statement complies with section 301 requirements relating to transmissions of unsolicited commercial electronic mail. To remove your name from our list immediately, please email: tnet1(a)prodigy.net with remove as the subject. We maintain our lists responsibly, and apologize for any inconvenience. Dear Candidate, You were recently nominated by The Office of Public Affairs for a free listing in The Kensington Who's Who Directory. http://www.gwh.net/~kensing/ Our Public Affairs Office gathers information from many recognized sources, including professional associations and societies, trade organizations, newspaper and magazine articles, professional reference publications, web presence, and referrals from existing members. As a highly respected professional in your field of expertise, we believe your contributions merit very serious consideration for inclusion in The Kensington Who's Who Directory. To maintain the level of accuracy, we ask you to click on the web address highlighted below and fill out the brief bit of information required for inclusion. There is no cost or obligation to be listed in The Kensington Who's Who Directory. All applicants will receive a free gift compliments of Kensington Who's Who. http://www.gwh.net/~kensing/ My Sincere Thanks, Lisa Narod Office Of Public Affairs

1 0

Internet Freedom Decision
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

John Gilmore calls attention to a recent US District Court decision which affirms controversial publication on the Internet: This is a big deal; it is strong support for the idea that publications should remain visible on the Internet UNTIL a judge has declared them illegal. Current practice of complainers is to try to get the material taken down immediately (typically by a service provider who's afraid to get sued), and then fight over whether to put it back! The case is in a defamation context, but might be applicable to the more common trademark/copyright/trade secret (e.g. scientology or domain name) censorship controversies. We should put the decision on the Web, and publicize the case. ----- See the decision and ACLU press release on it: http://jya.com/sheehan.htm

1 0

I am loooking for a reply to a MAIL BOMBER
by Han Solo 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hello! Some person that I know is sending me mail bombers, so I am looking for a virus mail or a powerfull mail bomber.. I tried with the Kaboom,qz, etc.... I couldn't use the avalanche cos I don't have the dlls, but I want use some powerfull mail bomber or a virus mail . Plase help me cos this person is send me 1000 mails per day..... Thank you _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

1 0

LOL. Made me look
by Seabiner＠aol.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

1 0

Extensis Download Registration
by info＠extensis.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Dear Cypher, Thank you for your interest in Extensis products! Please let us know if there is anything we can do to help you get the most out of our products. You can contact us at Info(a)extensis.com or by phone 503-274-2020. You can call us to place an order or you can order on-line or locate an Extensis reseller by visiting http://www.extensis.com/purchase/ If you supervise or work with a group of creative professionals and are interested in purchasing more than one copy of Extensis products, volume discounts and site licenses are available for workgroups. Call me for details. Best regards, Info(a)extensis.com 503-274-2020

1 0

Extensis Download Registration
by info＠extensis.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Dear Cypher, Thank you for your interest in Extensis products! Please let us know if there is anything we can do to help you get the most out of our products. You can contact us at Info(a)extensis.com or by phone 503-274-2020. You can call us to place an order or you can order on-line or locate an Extensis reseller by visiting http://www.extensis.com/purchase/ If you supervise or work with a group of creative professionals and are interested in purchasing more than one copy of Extensis products, volume discounts and site licenses are available for workgroups. Call me for details. Best regards, Info(a)extensis.com 503-274-2020

1 0

Mail Order Condoms....convenient!
by zey69＠uvm.haifa.ac.il 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Discreet..... MAIL ORDER CONDOMS! DISCREETLY PACKAGED, CONVENIENT, FAST DELIVERY! PACIFIC COAST MAIL ORDER Products is now offering .......... TROJAN.... AMERICAS #1 BRAND of condoms available discreetly by MAIL ORDER! We FEATURE the most popular style..... **** TROJAN-ENZ with spermicidal lubricant! **** Having condoms EASILY AVAILABLE is essential, YET many people do not carry them for VARIOUS reasons. Many people are EMBARRASSED to purchase condoms, while others do not have easy access to QUALITY condoms. WOMEN IN PARTICULAR are embarrassed to purchase condoms, but many wish to carry them. TEENAGERS are especially at risk of sexually transmitted disease and unwanted pregnancies as they often do not have easy access to quality condoms. Regardless of the reason for not having condoms when needed you are not only putting yourself, but others in danger of DISEASE and UNWANTED PREGNANCY. Be Responsible! Be Safe! BE Sensible! Our research indicates that the #1 SELLING CONDOM IS.... **** TROJAN-ENZ with spermicidal lubricant! **** PACIFIC COAST MAIL ORDER is featuring packages of 12 condoms with 2 additional condoms free (while supplies last, subject to change without notice) and will be shipped in DISCREET packaging the day your order is received! DISCREETLY PACKAGED! PROMPT DELIVERY! GREAT PRICE! PLEASE PRINT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING ORDER: ______ # OF PACKAGES FOR ONLY $ 8.99 EACH. ______ SHIPPING and HANDLING $ 2.00 EACH ______ Ca. Residents only (tax) $ .72 EACH Mail To: Name ___________________________ Address ____________________________ City,State,Zip _____________________________/// Please Send Check or Money Order to: Pacific Coast Mail Order 862 Sir Francis Drake Blvd. #352 San Anselmo,Ca. 94960 Please allow 14 days or for delivery. Your order will arrive discreetly packaged! ** To be removed from our mailing list please reply to: plsrmv(a)hotmail.com Thank You, Jane P. * *

1 0

VB 32 Bit Coders
by EpicTeU＠aol.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

VB 32 Bit Coders about: Hello, I am trying to start a VB 32 bit code bank you can send any code you want to exept codes for aol addons... . 1nce a week most likely on fridays I will check the hotmail account specifyed below and I will take all the codes and put them in a txt file and send it to everyone who sent a code in since I am working on a project useing winsock and Inet controls as alot of you may have noticed I will be posting alot of Code for those two controls. How to Send: To send Codes for the ML Send E-mail to VB32Coders(a)Hotmail.com In the sbject field write anonymous / Code topic if you don't want your E-Mail address to show up when I send the Codes out or else just type the topic of the code you are sending.. . Next Issue: I will be sending out the next code list on the 21st of this month So anyone tha wants to be on this list has about a week to send in codes ··€VB 32 BIT ML€·· ··€VB32Coders@Hotmail.com€·· · · ··€epiC€·· · ·

1 0

Re: VB 32 Bit Coders (apoligy)
by EpicTeU＠aol.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I am sorry for sending this mail to the Cypherpunks list I made the same mistake with bugtraq it wont happen again epiC

1 0

FORUM web site
by bill payne 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Friday 8/14/98 8:20 PM John Young My mind is working after our conversation a few minutes ago. Morales and I seek to educate others to our experiences. We will share documents on Internet. Libertad help educated me. Here is some of what Libertad said. Libertad is an underground organization. Libertad has helped me more than any number of lawyers ever could. Libertad enumerates the steps the government takes against whistleblowers. 1 Do not investigate the complaint. 2 Investigate complainer. 3 Take action against complainer. 4 Attempt to discredit complainer. Ruin complainer's reputation and career. 5 Attempt to drive complainer to suicide, divorce, alcohol or drug abuse. 6 Financially ruin the complainer through delay another legal tactics. 7 Enlist help of state delegation to destroy the complainer. 8 Improperly influence complainer's lawyer. 9 Improperly influence judge. 10 Load the jury. 11 Hide behind classification. 12 Seal the case to protect the government. John Gowan 73710.141(a)compuserve.com and Max Hernandez are the major forces behind THE UNDERGROUND ORGANIZATION Libertad. Morales and my minds work SLOW when TRYING to decide what to do. Sitting Bull, whose Indian name was Tatanka Iyotake, was born in the Grand River region of present-day South Dakota in approximately 1831. His nickname was Hunkesi, meaning "Slow" because he never hurried and did everything with care. http://www.incwell.com/Biographies/SittingBull.html We LABOR in THOUGHT over alternatives. But then WE STRIKE. Thank you so much for the Chrysler award nomination. http://www.jya.com/chrysler98.htm I am thinking SLOWLY about how we would put-together a FORUM web site with documents which could be easily edited INTO FORMAL DOCUMENTS to help others FIGHT THE GREAT SATAN. Sitting Bull wrote in a statement I cannot find on the web, but read at the Yellowstone museum in West Yellowstone, that THE main function of senior citizens is to educate the young. bill http://www.apcatalog.com/cgi-bin/AP?ISBN=0125475705&LOCATION=US&FORM=FORM2 It has been over about 27 years since I directed any Ph.D. students http://www-hto.usc.edu/software/seqaln/doc/html/gfsr.3.html http://www.friction-free-economy.com/ http://www.mhpcc.edu/general/john.html UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT William H. Payne ) Arthur R. Morales ) ) Appellants Plaintiffs, ) ) 98-2156 v ) 98-2157 ) Lieutenant General Kenneth A. Minihan, USAF ) Director, National Security Agency ) National Security Agency ) ) Appellees Defendants ) RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MEMORANDUM BRIEFS ADDRESSING JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES 1 COMES NOW appellant plaintiffs [Appellants - Plaintiffs] Payne [Payne] and Morales [Morales] pro se litigants to exercise their rights guaranteed under the Constitution and Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/docs/frap-iop.htm Any party may file a response in opposition to a motion other than one for procedural order [for which see subdivision (b)] within 7 days after service of the motion, ... http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/docs/frap-iop.htm#27 and FRAP 26c Additional Time after Service. When a party is required or permitted to act within a prescribed period after service of a paper upon that party, 3 calendar days are added to the prescribed period unless the paper is delivered on the date of service stated in the proof of service. http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/docs/frap-iop.htm#26c MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MEMORANDUM BRIEFS ADDRESSING JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES [MOTION] was served on August 3, 1998 by Jan E Mitchell [Mitchell], Assistant US Attorney by mail. Exhibit A. 2 Mitchell writes The Defendant-Appellee, National Security Agency [1], moves this Court for an Order extending the time to and including twenty-one (21) days following the date Plaintiffs-Appellants file their memorandum brief in which to file it memorandum briefs discussing jurisdictional issue in the above-referenced appeals. ... 3. Defendant-Appellee is not seeking an appeal and therefore, will NOT seek a certification for interlocutory appeal from the District Court's memorandum Opinion and Order entered April 30, 1998, nor will Defendant-Appellee seek an order explicitly adjudicating all remaining claims. 4. On July 22, 1998, Plaintiffs-Appellants were granted an extension until September 1, 1998 to respond to the Court's show cause orders of June 30, 1998. 5 . Defendant-Appellee seeks an additional twenty-one (21) days from the date in which Plaintiff's- Appellants' memorandum must be served in which to serve the memorandum briefs. According to the Show Cause Order, if Appellants do not seek and obtain a certification for interlocutory appeal or a final dispositive adjudication concerning appeal N. 9821257, the appeal may be dismissed, in which case a jurisdictional brief would not be required as to that appeal. Should Plaintiffs-Appellants seek and obtain a certification for interlocutory appeal pertaining to No. 2157, in the interest of economy, Defendant-Appellant seeks to file the two memorandum briefs on the two very related jurisdictional issues at one time. 6. Undersigned counsel for Defendant-Appellee has contacted Plaintiff-Appellant William H. Payne who has concurred on his own behalf and own behalf for Plaintiff-Appellant Arthur R. Morales in granting of this motion. ... 3 Payne confirms 6 above in fax Monday 8/3/98 3:41 PM FAX Jan Elizabeth Mitchell Assistant U.S. Attorney U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney District of New Mexico Post Office Box 607 Albuquerque, NM 87103 505/346-7274 505/766-2868 FAX 505/346-7205 Dear Ms Mitchell: Purpose of the fax is to 1 review points covered in our 8/3/98 14:18 phone conversation 2 suggest settlement. You phoned me today. You told me that you planned to file a motion or response to the Tenth circuit's request Morales and my response to the jurisdictional issue on the 21st of August. I told you that this was premature on your part since we had moved for a second time for an extension of time. I told you also that this matter was now before congress. You appeared to indicate to me that you were in the process of adding both Morales and Minihan as named parties in this appeal. You asked me if it would be agreeable to us if you filed a response to the Tenth circuit 21 days AFTER Morales and I filed our response to the Tenth circuit on the jurisdictional issue. I AGREED. I spoke to Morales on the phone shortly after our phone conversation. Arguing points of law before court clerks and judges who have outstanding criminal complaint affidavits for crimes COMMITTED IN WRITING against them would be unproductive on Morales and my part. Therefore, we will proceed to resolve the criminal conduct on the part of judges and court clerks before we proceed further in this matter. We will do this at the Congressional level. Senate Judiciary Committe chairman Orrin Hatch, unfortunately, failed to properly process a valid complaint on New Mexico district court chief judge John Conway in 1995. http://www.jya.com/whp071598.htm Hatch's failure to properly respond in 1995, in large part, caused our current legal conflict with DIR NSA Minihan. We foresee an unfortunate escalation of hostilities if this matter proceeds as it is. We do not wish this. We seek settlement of the UNFORTUNATE matter at the earliest time. We ask your and Congressional help to settle this UNFORTUNATE matter before it gets WORSE. If I have made any essential material errors in reporting my impression of the contents of our conversation, then I would appreciate you giving your impression of possible errors. You can do this in the letter you said you would write to us. Sincerely, bill payne 13015 Calle de Sandias NE Albuquerque, NM 87111 Distribution Senate Judiciary Committee e-mail Arthur R Morales e-mail 4 Michell responds to 3 in letter dated August 4, 1998. Exhibit B Mitchell writes I have received Mr. Payne's FAX dated August 3, 1998 at 4:22. I want to clarify a few points. ... As to the caption of the appeal, I have noted in the motion for extension of time which has been filed with the Tenth Circuit that there was an additional Defendant numbed in the District Court case. However, I am constrained at the time to use the caption which the Tenth Circuit is reflecting on its pleadings. I will forward your FAX suggesting settlement to Defendants. Sincerely, JOHN J. KELLY United States Attorney signature JAN ELIZABETH MITCHELL Assistant U. S. Attorney 5 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/overview.htm Rule 54(b) states (b) Judgment Upon Multiple Claims or Involving Multiple Parties. When more than one claim for relief is presented in an action, whether as a claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim, or when multiple parties are involved, the court may direct the entry of a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or parties only upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay and upon an express direction for the entry of judgment. In the absence of such determination and direction, any order or other form of decision, however designated, which adjudicates fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties shall not terminate the action as to any of the claims or parties, and the order or other form of decision is subject to revision at any time before the entry of judgment adjudicating all the claims and the rights and liabilities of all the parties. Interpretation of meaning of 54(b) is RULE 54(b) JUDGMENTS UPON MULTIPLE CLAIMS OR INVOLVING MULTIPLE PARTIES CORE CONCEPT A judgment entered as to less than all claims in a lawsuit, or as to less than all parties in a lawsuit, is not immediately appealable. Instead, the appeal must generally await the entry of judgment as to all remaining claims and parties. However, the district court can make a judgment as to less than all claims or parties "final", and thus immediately appeals, by expressly certifying that no just cause exists to delay the appeal and by directing the entry of judgment. APPLICATIONS Prerequisites to Rule 54(b) There are three prerequisites for obtaining an immediately appealable judgment from the district court entered as to less than all claims or parties. 1: Multiple Claims or Parties Fully Resolved: To be eligible for immediate appeal under Rule 54(b), a partial adjudication must either (a) finally resolve at least one claim or (b) finally resolve the rights and liabilities of at least one party. A claim or a party's interest MUST be adjudicated to finality, such that there is nothing more to do that claim or that party but await the conclusion of the remaining portion of the litigation. This limitation is a pivotal one. Rule 54(b) does not alter the normal rules of appellate finality for individuals claims, and no appeal may be taken from district court ruling or any particular claim until the court finally resolves that claim. Multiple claims exist where each claim is factually separate and independent, or where each claim could be enforced separately. 2: No just Cause for Delay: The district court must state, in clear and unmistakable language, that there is no just cause to delay the appeal of the adjudicated claim or the adjudicated right and liability of a party. Whether "just cause" exists is a determination made on a case-by-case basis. Certain criteria guide the court's consideration: o The relationship between adjudicated and unadjudicated claims; o The possibility that the need for appellate review might be mooted by future developments in district court; o The possibility that the district court might be obligated to consider the same issue on a later occasion; o The presence (or absence) or a claim or counterclaim that could result in a set-off against the judgment now sought to be made final and appealable; and o Other factors, including delay, economic and solvency concerns, shortening of trial time, frivolity or competing claims, and expense. 3: Entry of judgment: In clear and unmistakable language, the district court must also direct that judgment is entered as to that one claim or one party. Explanation by the District Court In its order entering a Rule 54(b) judgment, the district court must clearly explain why it has concluded that an immediate appellate review of that order is advisable. Burden of Proof The moving party bears the burden of establishing that a partial judgment should be entered under Rule 54(b). Discretion of District Judge Whether to enter a judgment under Rule 54(b) is reserved to the sound discretion of the district judge. Such arguments are contrary to the historic federal policy against piecemeal appeals. For this reason, Rule 54(b) orders are not granted routinely or an accommodation to counsel. Instead, the district court must carefully balance the needs of the parties for an immediate appeal against the interests of efficient management of the litigation. Motions for Rule 54(b) Judgments A party may file a motion with the court to certify under Rule 54(b), or the court may do so on its own initiative. Effects of Rule 54(b) Judgments Once entered, the time for appeal on the judgment begins to run, and does post-judgment interest. Appealability of Denials for Rule 54(b) Requests Allowing immediate appellate review of "partial" final judgments is a practice that departs from the federal courts' traditional opposition to piecemeal appeals. Rule 54(b), thus, represents an unusual exception to this settled policy. Predictably, the court reject immediate attempt to challenge denials of Rule 54(b) judgments as premature and unappealable until a final ruling his entered on the merits. Federal Civil Rules Handbook 1996, Baicker-McKee, Janssen, Corr, West Publishing Company 6 Appellants-Plaintiffs assert that there is NO REASON to seek a Rule 54 (b) certification for the REASON THAT New Mexico district judge Santiago Campos [Campos] already issued such certification. FACT 1 4 May 1998 Campos writes NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that sua sponte, Defendant is DEEMED by the Court to be the NSA, and not Lt. Gen. Kenneth A. Minihan. Future captions for this case should reflect this change. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Morales is GRANTED. http://jya.com/whp043098.htm 1: [A] claim or a party's interest MUST be adjudicated to finality ... has been satisfied. FACT 2 2: is satisfed. [N]o just Cause for Delay: Dismissing Minihan and Morales have nothing to do with the remaining claims of whether AppelleeS- DefendantS Minihan and NSA provide lawfully requested documents on 1 Iran messages given to Iraq during the Iraq/Iran war. http://www.aci.net/kalliste/speccoll.htm http://caq.com/cryptogate 2 Libyan message intercepted by the US 3 deficient NSA cryptographic algorithms FACT 3 3: In clear and unmistakable language, the district court must also direct that judgment is entered as to that one claim or one party. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that sua sponte, Defendant is DEEMED by the Court to be the NSA, and not Lt. Gen. Kenneth A. Minihan. Future captions for this case should reflect this change. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Morales is GRANTED. http://jya.com/whp043098.htm is QUITE CLEAR. FACT 4 Motions for Rule 54(b) Judgments A party may file a motion with the court to certify under Rule 54(b), or the court may do so on its own initiative. Campos issues Rule 54(b) certification ON HIS OWN INITIATIVE. However, I shall await decision on the appeals before the Tenth circuit prior to setting a date for presentment of the classified Declaration or before taking any further action in this case. FACT 5 Therefore, no Rule 54(b) certification needs to be sought by Appellants-Plaintiffs. 7 Campos did not explicitly state in Campos's June 29, 1998 letter http://jya.com/sec062998.htm or in Campos' MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER http://jya.com/whp043098.htm that a Rule 54(b) decision was issued. Therefore, Appellants-Plaintiffs seek to clarify Campos intention Wednesday 8/12/98 Certified Return receipt requested Santiago E. Campos, Senior Judge P.O. Box 2244 U.S. Courthouse South Federal Place Santa Fe, NM 87504-2244 Re: William H. Payne v. National Security Agency Civ. No. 97-0266 SC/DJS Dear Judge Campos, We assume that your statement However, I shall await decision on the appeals before the Tenth circuit prior to setting a date for presentment of the classified Declaration or before taking any further action in this case. in your June 29, 1998 letter seen at http://jya.com/sec062998.htm is a sua sponte Rule 54(b) certification for immediate appeal. If we are incorrect in our assumption, then we ask that you write us and explain why we would need to wait to appeal. Clearly we have satisfied the three conditions required for immediate appeal which we are sure you are acquainted. If not, however, these conditions are included in Federal Civil Rules Handbook 1996, Baicker-McKee, Janssen, Corr, West Publishing Company Also, we would ask that you justify seeking permission for appeal from a judge who has issued a MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER when appellants have satisfied Rule 54(b) conditions if you choose to respond negative. If we do not hear from you Monday August 31, 1998, then we will treat our assumption as correct. Sincerely William H. Payne Arthur R. Morales 13015 Calle de Sandias NE 1024 Los Arboles NW Albuquerque, NM 87111 Albuquerque, NM 87107 8 Appellants-Plaintiffs receive Exhibit C UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT WILLIAM H. PAYNE; ARTHUR R. MORALES Nos. 98-2156 Plaintiff - Appellants, 98-2157 NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, Defendant - Appellee. ORDER Filed August 6, 1998 The appellants and appellee are granted additional time until September 21, 1998 to this court's show cause order of June 30, 1998. All other requests contained in the appellants; motion filed August 4, 1998 are referred to the panel of judges who will hear this case on the merits. Entered for the Court PATRICK FISHER, Clerk of Court by: signature Randy Simmons? Deputy Clerk A Hearing MUST be corrected to include defendant Minihan. B Clerk FISHER has not addressed his removal from the appeal for previous title 18 felony violations of law. C ORDER does not address selection of three judge panel so not to include judges accused of Title 18 felony violations of law or biased judges. WHEREFORE 9 CORRECT ORDER Filed August 6, 1998 to include NSA Director Minihan. for reason 1 Find out who is RESPONSIBLE 2 Hold them ACCOUNTABLE 3 Hold them individually and their agency FINANCIALLY LIABLE Some may pay with their lives for http://www.aci.net/kalliste/speccoll.htm http://caq.com/cryptogate http://jya.com/whpfiles.htm http://www.qainfo.se/~lb/crypto_ag.htm if this matter is NOT PEACEFULLY SETTLED. 10 EXPLICITLY RESPOND to request for removal of clerks FISHER and Hoecker from this appeal. 11 EXPLAIN how an unbiased panel of judges can be found at the Tenth circuit. Respectfully submitted, William H. Payne 13015 Calle de Sandias NE Albuquerque, NM 87111 Arthur R. Morales 1024 Los Arboles NW Albuquerque, NM 87107 Pro se litigants CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing response and motion was mailed to Lieutenant General Kenneth A. Minihan, USAF, Director, National Security Agency, National Security Agency, 9800 Savage Road, Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755-6000 and mailed to Jan E Mitchell, Assistant US Attorney, 9 Floor, Bank of America Building, 3rd and Tijeras, ABQ, NM 87102 an original and three copies as required by FRAP 27(d) http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/docs/frap-iop.htm#27d United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, 1823 Stout Street, Denver, Co 80257 by CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED mail August 12, 1998. 9

1 0

home loans, consolidate debt
by jojo333＠yahoo.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Mortgage rates are at an all time low! Would you like to pay off all your debts, have money for home Improvements, or cash for any purpose? If you live in the U.S., own a home, and need any of the following: · One easy low payment for all your debts. · Cash for home improvements, vacations, etc. · Money for your child's education. · A lower interest rate 2nd mortgage · Consolidate your credit cards into one lower payment http://www.geocities.com/Baja/Canyon/7296/ Be debt free up to 3 times faster than what you are currently paying off. Pay off your car and credit card loans. Apply today with Loan Generator for an easy no cost, and no obligation home loan to see how to make a home equity loan work for you! **Even if you have been denied before, we may be able to help you! We fund with our own money! APPLY TODAY, IT'S FREE!! http://www.geocities.com/Baja/Canyon/7296/ To learn more about how you can be debt free, and have all your Financing Options explained to you visit http://www.geocities.com/Baja/Canyon/7296/ or call 714 595-1050 for more information. Our financial consultants will be able to speak with you for no Obligation.

1 0

Dennis Rodman hounded by porn stars/Mom dates alien son http://stuffed.net/98/8/14/
by STUFFED/EUREKA! 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Welcome to today's issue of Stuffed. To read it you should click on the URL below. If it is not made clickable by your email program you will need to use your mouse to highlight the line, copy it and then paste it into your browser (then press Return). http://stuffed.net/98/8/14/ If you have an email program that can display web pages you will find today's front cover should have already been disp- layed and can be clicked on to take you straight to Stuffed. This email is never sent unsolicited. Stuffed is the supplement for the Eureka newsletter you subscribed to. Full instructions on unsubscribing are in every issue of Eureka!

1 0

Read Me Now
by 0ikg＠aol.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hi. If you received this letter by accident, there is no need to ask to be taken off the mailing list, as this letter will ONLY be sent to you ONCE.Thanks This is it folks. This is the letter you've been reading about in the news lately. Due to the popularity of this letter on the Internet, a major nightly news program recently devoted an entire show to the investigation of the program described below , to see if it really can make people money. If you saw it, you know that their conclusion was that while most people did not make the $50,000 discussed in the plan, everyone who followed the instructions was able to make 100 to 200 times their money at the very least. The show also investigated whether or not the program was legal. Their findings proved once and for all that there are absolutely no laws prohibiting the participation in the program. This has helped to show people that this is a simple, harmless and fun way to make some extra money at home. This is for real. I Actually Read a Piece of E-Mail & I HAVE NOW QUIT MY JOB! Hello, my name is Bubba and now I will have to change my profile to " Retired", as I quit my job of 5 yrs. as Asst. Mgr. in auto sales. As a rule, I delete all unsolicited "junk" e-mail and use my account primarily for business. I received what I assumed was this same e-mail countless times and deleted it each time. About two months ago I received it again and, because of the catchy subject line, I finally read it. Afterwards, I thought , "OK, I give in, I'm going to try this. I can certainly afford to invest $20 and, on the other hand, there's nothing wrong with creating a little excess cash." I promptly mailed four $5 bills and, after receiving the reports, paid a friend of mine a small fee to send out some e-mail advertisements for me. After reading the reports, I also learned how easy it is to bulk e-mail for free! I was not prepared for the results. Everyday for the last six weeks, my P.O.box has been overflowing with $5 bills. I am stunned by all the money that keeps rolling in! I promise you, if you follow the directions in this e-mail and be prepared to eventually set aside about an hour each day to follow up (and count your money!), you can make at least as much money as I did. You don't need to be a wiz at the computer, but I'll bet you already are. If you can open an envelope, remove the money, and send an e-mail message, then you're on your way to the bank. Take the time to read this so you'll understand how easy it is. If I can do this, so can you! GO FOR IT NOW!! PS: With the order of report # 1, I will send You some SIMPLE instructions on how to follow the program effectively. The following is a copy of the e-mail I read: $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ This is a LEGAL, MONEY-MAKING PHENOMENON. PRINT this letter, read the directions, THEN READ IT AGAIN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You are about to embark on the most profitable and unique program you may ever see. Many times over, it has demonstrated and proven its ability to generate large amounts of cash. This program is showing fantastic appeal with a huge and ever-growing on-line population desirous of additional income. This is a legitimate, LEGAL, money-making opportunity. It does not require you to come in personal contact with people, do any hard work, and best of all, you never have to leave the house, except to get the mail and go to the bank! This truly is that lucky break you've been waiting for! Simply follow the easy instructions in this letter, and your financial dreams can come true! When followed correctly, this electronic, multi-level marketing program WORKS! Thousands of people have used this program to: - Raise capital to start their own business - Pay off debts - Buy homes, cars, etc., - Even retire! This is your chance, so don't pass it up! --------------------------------------------------------------- OVERVIEW OF THIS EXTRAORDINARY ELECTRONIC MULTI-LEVEL MARKETING PROGRAM --------------------------------------------------------------- Basically, this is what we do: We send thousands of people a product that they paid us $5.00 US for, that costs next to nothing to produce and e-mail back to them. As with all multi- level businesses, we build our business by recruiting new partners and selling our products. Every state in the U.S. allows you to recruit new multi- level business online (via your computer). We are not promising you anything. You have to put forth some effort to make this business work, but come on how hard is emailing! The products in this program are a series of four business and financial reports costing $5.00 each. Each order you receive is to include: * $5.00 cash United States Currency * The name and number of the report they are ordering * The e-mail address where you will e-mail them the report they ordered. To fill each order, you simply e-mail the product to the buyer. THAT'S IT! The $5.00 is yours! This is the EASIEST electronic multi-level marketing business anywhere! FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS TO THE LETTER AND BE PREPARED TO REAP THE STAGGERING BENEFITS! ******* I N S T R U C T I O N S ******* This is what you MUST do: 1. Order all 4 reports shown on the list below (you can't sell them if you don't order them). * For each report, send $5.00 CASH, the NAME & NUMBER OF THE REPORT YOU ARE ORDERING, YOUR E-MAIL ADDRESS, and YOUR RETURN POSTAL ADDRESS (in case of a problem) to the person whose name appears on the list next to the report. * When you place your order, make sure you order each of the four reports. You will need all four reports so that you can save them on your computer and resell them. * Within a few days you are to receive, via e-mail, each of the four reports. Save them on your computer so they will be accessible for you to send to the 1,000's of people who will order them from you. 2. IMPORTANT-- DO NOT alter the names of the people who are listed next to each report, or their sequence on the list, in any way other than is instructed below in steps "a" through "d" or you will lose out on the majority of your profits.Once you understand the way this works, you'll also see how it doesn't work if you change it. Remember, this method has been tested, and if you alter it, it will not work. a. Look below for the listing of available reports. b. After you've ordered the four reports, replace the name and address under REPORT #1 with your name and address, moving the one that was there down to REPORT #2. c. Move the name and address that was under REPORT #2 down to REPORT #3. d. Move the name and address that was under REPORT #3 down to REPORT #4. e. The name and address that was under REPORT #4 is removed from the list and has NO DOUBT collected large sums of cash! Please make sure you copy everyone's name and address ACCURATELY! 3. Take this entire letter, including the modified list of names, and save it to your computer. Make NO changes to the instruction portion of this letter. 4. Now you're ready to start an advertising campaign on the WORLDWIDE WEB! Advertising on the WEB can be very, very inexpensive, and there are HUNDREDS of FREE places to advertise. Another avenue which you could use for advertising is e-mail lists. You can buy these lists for under $20/2,000 addresses or you can pay someone to take care of it for you. BE SURE TO START YOUR AD CAMPAIGN IMMEDIATELY! 5. For every $5.00 you receive, all you must do is e-mail them the report they ordered. THAT'S IT! ALWAYS PROVIDE SAME-DAY SERVICE ON ALL ORDERS! This will help guarantee that the e-mail THEY send out, with YOUR name and address on it, will be prompt because they can't advertise until they receive the report! To grow fast be prompt and courteous. ------------------------------------------ AVAILABLE REPORTS ------------------------------------------ **Order each Report by number and name** Notes: - ALWAYS SEND $5 CASH FOR EACH REPORT - ALWAYS SEND YOUR ORDER VIA THE QUICKEST DELIVERY - Make sure the cash is concealed by wrapping it in at least two sheets of paper - On one of those sheets of paper, include: (a) the number & name of the report you are ordering, (b) your e-mail address, and (c) your postal address. _________________________________________________________________ REPORT #1 "HOW TO MAKE $250,000 THROUGH MULTI-LEVEL SALES" ORDER REPORT #1 FROM: L. Smith 7082 Woolworth Rd. Shreveport, Louisiana 71129 _________________________________________________________________ REPORT #2 "MAJOR CORPORATIONS AND MULTI-LEVEL SALES" ORDER REPORT #2 FROM: BUBBA C. PO BOX 18424 SHREVEPORT, LA. 71138 _________________________________________________________________ REPORT #3 "SOURCES FOR THE BEST MAILING LISTS" ORDER REPORT #3 FROM: SDS 2536 LEXINGTON DR. LA PLACE, LA. 70068 _________________________________________________________________ REPORT #4 "EVALUATING MULTI-LEVEL SALES PLANS" ORDER REPORT #4 FROM: THE D AND S CO. P.O. BOX 3293 CHANDLER,AZ. 85244-3293 _________________________________________________________________ HERE'S HOW THIS AMAZING PLAN WILL MAKE YOU $MONEY$ ----------------------------------------------------------------- Let's say you decide to start small just to see how well it works. Assume your goal is to get 10 people to participate on your first level. (Placing a lot of FREE ads on the internet will EASILY get a larger response.) Also assume that everyone else in YOUR ORGANIZATION gets ONLY 10 downline members. Follow this example to achieve the STAGGERING results below. 1st level--your 10 members with 5 = $50 2nd level--10 members from those 10 ($5 x 100) = $500 3rd level--10 members from those 100 ($5 x 1,000) = $5,000 4th level--10 members from those 1,000 ($5 x 10,000) = $50,000 THIS TOTALS ----------->$55,550 Remember friends, this assumes that the people who participate only recruit 10 people each. Think for a moment what would happen if they got 20 people to participate! Lots of people get 100s of participants! THINK ABOUT IT! Your cost to participate in this is practically nothing (surely you can afford $20). You obviously already have an internet connection and e-mail is FREE!!! REPORT#3 shows you the most productive methods for bulk e-mailing and purchasing e-mail lists. Some list & bulk e-mail vendors even work on trade! About 50,000 new people get online every month! *******TIPS FOR SUCCESS******** TREAT THIS AS YOUR BUSINESS! Be prompt, professional, and follow the directions accurately. * Send for the four reports IMMEDIATELY so you will have them when the orders start coming in because: When you receive a $5 order, you MUST send out the requested product/report to comply with the U.S. Postal & Lottery Laws, Title 8,Sections 1302 and 1341 or Title 18, Section 3005 in the U.S. Code, also Code of Federal Regs. vol. 16, Sections 255 and 436, which state that "a product or service must be exchanged for money received." * ALWAYS PROVIDE SAME-DAY SERVICE ON THE ORDERS YOU RECEIVE. * Be patient and persistent with this program. If you follow the instructions exactly, the results WILL undoubtedly be SUCCESSFUL! * ABOVE ALL, HAVE FAITH IN YOURSELF AND KNOW YOU WILL SUCCEED! *******YOUR SUCCESS GUIDELINE******* Follow these guidelines to help assure your success: If you don't receive 10 to 20 orders for REPORT #1 within two weeks, continue advertising until you do. Then, a couple of weeks later you should receive at least 50 orders for REPORT #2. If you don't, continue advertising until you do. Once you have received 50 or more orders for REPORT #2, YOU CAN RELAX, because the system is already working for you, and the cash can continue to roll in! THIS IS IMPORTANT TO REMEMBER: Every time your name is moved down on the list, you are placed in front of a DIFFERENT report. You can KEEP TRACK of your PROGRESS by watching which report people are ordering from you. If you want to generate more income, send another batch of e-mails and start the whole process again! There is no limit to the income you will generate from this business! NOTE: If you need help with starting a business, registering a business name, how income tax is handled, etc., contact your local office of the Small Business Administration (a Federal agency) for free help and answers to questions. Also, the Internal Revenue Service offers free help via telephone and free seminars about business taxes. This letter has been edited to help comply with the Federal Trade Commission requirements. Any amounts of earnigs listed in this leter can be factual or ficticous. Your earnings and results are highly dependant on your activities and advertising. This letter constitutes no guarantees stated nor implied. In the event that it is determined that this letter constitutes a guarantee of any kind, that guarantee is now void. If you have any question of the legality of this letter contact the Office of Associate Director for Marketing Pratices Federal Trade Commission Bureau of consumer Protection in Washington DC. *******T E S T I M O N I A L S******* This program does work, but you must follow it EXACTLY! Especially the rule of not trying to place your name in a different position, it won't work and you'll lose a lot of potential income. I'm living proof that it works. It really is a great opportunity to make relatively easy money, with little cost to you. If you do choose to participate, follow the program exactly, and you'll be on your way to financial security. Sean McLaughlin, Jackson, MS I just want to pass along my best wishes and encouragement to you. Any doubts you have will vanish when your first orders come in. I even checked with the U.S. Post Office to verify that the plan was legal. It definitely is! IT WORKS!!! Paul Johnson, Raleigh, NC The main reason for this letter is to convince you that this system is honest, lawful, extremely profitable, and is a way to get a large amount of money in a short time. I was approached several times before I checked this out. I joined just to see what one could expect in return for the minimal effort and money required. To my astonishment, I received $36,470.00 in the first 14 weeks, with money still coming in. Sincerely yours, Phillip A. Brown, Esq. Not being the gambling type, it took me several weeks to make up my mind to participate in this plan. But conservative that I am, I decided that the initial investment was so little that there was just no way that I wouldn't get enough orders to at least get my money back. Boy, was I surprised when I found my medium-size post office box crammed with orders! For a while, it got so overloaded that I had to start picking up my mail at the window. I'll make more money this year than any 10 years of my life before. The nice thing about this deal is that it doesn't matter where in the U.S. the people live. There simply isn't a better investment with a faster return. Mary Rockland, Lansing, MI I had received this program before. I deleted it, but later I wondered if I shouldn't have given it a try. Of course, I had no idea who to contact to get another copy, so I had to wait until I was e-mailed another program...11 months passed then it came...I didn't delete this one!...I made more than $41,000 on the first try!! D. Wilburn, Muncie, IN This is my third time to participate in this plan. We have quit our jobs, and will soon buy a home on the beach and live off the interest on our money. The only way on earth that this plan will work for you is if you do it. For your sake, and for your family's sake don't pass up this golden opportunity. Good luck and happy spending! Charles Fairchild, Spokane, WA You have great potential for extra earnings that is available at your finger-tips! You have unlimited access to wealth, but you must be willing to take that first step! ORDER YOUR REPORTS TODAY AND GET STARTED ON YOUR ROAD TO FINANCIAL FREEDOM!!!

1 0

another RSA tattoo
by Adam Back 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Cancer Omega <comega(a)sekurity.org> sent me a nice RSA in perl tattoo he has had done on the left of his chest. See: http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/tattoo2.html (and for the other tattoo see: http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/ ) Adam

1 0

Re: pool size
by Alex de Joode 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

URL: http://personal.sip.fi/~lm/c2txt2c/ Problem: There is problem with free speech in the USA: Judge Gwin of the Federal District Court of the Northern District of Ohio has recently held that software is not protected by the First Amendment because it is a ``functional device'' like a telephone circuit. Demonstration that C source is speech: I made a program that translates C-source for Blowfish cryptographic algorithm to English. Comment by author: "********************blowfish.h*******************". Comment by author: " $Id: blowfish.h,v 1.3 1995/01/23 12:38:02 pr Exppr $". There is Robert code named "MAXKEYBYTES" who has 56 leafs. Comment by author: " 448 bits ". There is William code named "bf_N" who has 16 leafs. There is Edward code named "noErr" who has 0 leafs. There is Richard code named "DATAERROR" who has -1 leafs. There is Michael code named "KEYBYTES" who has 8 leafs. This rugged Charles code named "subkeyfilename" says "Blowfish.dat" any time he has chance. >From here I'm assuming that melons are about same size as coconuts. >From here I'm assuming that apples are about same size as oranges. >From here I'm assuming that cherries are about same size as strawberries. Thats was all things related to that thing. Comment by author: " ORDER_BADC ". There exist process named "opensubkeyfile". Process should takes these things as input: nothing. That process usually produces tomatoes. I will tell later more about that process. There exist process named "F". Process should takes these things as input: Donald code named "x" liking coconuts. That process usually produces coconuts. I will tell later more about that process. There exist process named "Blowfish_encipher". Process should takes these things as input: location of Ronald code named "xl" liking coconuts and location of Allen code named "xr" liking coconuts. That process usually produces nothing. I will tell later more about that process. There exist process named "Blowfish_decipher". Process should takes these things as input: location of Ronald code named "xl" liking coconuts and location of Allen code named "xr" liking coconuts. That process usually produces nothing. I will tell later more about that process.

1 0

Other Hagengruber fun with taxpayers' money
by bill payne 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Saturday 8/15/98 8:04 AM J Orlin Grabbe I read Nuclear BIOS Sandia Scraps Guided Nuke Project We were just having fun, Hagengruber says Sandia National Laboratories has shut down an effort to design a guided nuclear bomb that critics say was aimed at Third World targets. Sandia pulled the plug because of controversy over the fact that the lab never received permission for the project from senior levels of the Clinton administration, said Sandia vice president Roger Hagengruber. A flight test scheduled for next month in which an unarmed prototype was to have been dropped from an airplane has been canceled, Hagengruber said, and lab scientists will wrap up their reports on their four-year work on the project by the end of September. Critics said the $15.5 million project was intended to give U.S. military forces a new kind of nuclear bomb that could be used in conflicts against small nations trying to acquire nuclear, biological or chemical weapons. ... http://www.aci.net/kalliste/ At the height of implementing the seismic data authenticator http://jya.com/da/whpda.htm based on NSAs deficient algorithm. See Appendix S http://jya.com/da/whpda.htm#apps I SQUANDERED about $50k EACH WEEK on a flawed concept based and a deficient algorithm. My ROUGH guess that I WROTE OVER $250,000 in purchase orders for the Sandia seismic data authenticator! This amount DID NOT INCLUDE MY SALARY, a TECHNICIAN, and Travel. The first implementation was done in 1974, by R. E. D. Stewart, D. A. Reynolds, and J. G. Deasey. This was a "bench test" implementation in the sense that the algorithm was done in hardware wire, wrapped on "cash" cards, and placed in a test rack. http://jya.com/da/whpda.htm Reynolds and Deasy did the work. Stewart was one of Hagengubers spook shop [building 868] employees. Stewart merely wrote the report. Stewart wrote that the cost of the prototype was $400,000 if my memory is correct. The money came from outside Sandia, perhaps NSA or DARPA. I was ordered by project leader H B Durham to hold the cost down. I was also ordered by Durham follow NSA's orders. Durhams exact words were If they want a pink overcoat, sell them a pink overcoat. I KNEW while I was doing the work that both the data authentication concept was flawed - multiple redundant stations is the correct AND CURRENTLY IN USE concept - and the algorithm was BAD. So did Durham from what he told me. Durham regarded the data authenticator as a necessary political evil, was my opinion. Durhams boss was John Holovka. Holovkas boss was Paul Stokes. Stokes told me that the concept of data authentication was invented at Sandia and that he, Stokes, invented it. Stokes ordered the data authenticator fielded over the classification objections of NSA. Stokes boss was ROGER HAGENGRUBER. Ive been involved with shift register implementation work for a LONG TIME. It has been over about 27 years since I directed any Ph.D. students http://www-hto.usc.edu/software/seqaln/doc/html/gfsr.3.html http://www.friction-free-economy.com/ http://www.mhpcc.edu/general/john.html So I documented the bad NSA algorithm and implementation advice. http://jya.com/da/whpda.htm My SAND report cost A LOT OF MONEY to produce for the REPORT ALONE. But NOT ALL OF THE MONEY WAS WASTED. 1 http://www.apcatalog.com/cgi-bin/AP?ISBN=0125475705&LOCATION=US&FORM=FORM2 2 http://jya.com/f86/whpf86.htm The seismic data authenticator is ANOTHER OF ROGER HAGENGRUBERS PROJECTS Later bill Friday 8/14/98 9:06 AM John Young http://www.jya.com/index.htm J Orlin Grabbe http://www.aci.net/kalliste/ Roger Hagengruber is making news http://www.abqjournal.com/scitech/1sci8-14.htm Hagengruber 1 was Jim Durham's office mate when Hagengruber was new at Sandia. H. B. Durham who served as project leader http://jya.com/da/whpda.htm 2 was C William Childers' boss 3 was James Gosler's boss 4 was Paul Stokes' boss Originator: Paul A. Stokes Date: 4/28/92 http://jya.com/da/whpda.htm 5 encouraged Sandia to do more 'work for others' projects like for the FBI and NSA. This includes the 'spiking work' for NSA. http://www.aci.net/kalliste/ricono.htm http://www.qainfo.se/~lb/crypto_ag.htm http://caq.com/cryptogate 6 told employees that Hagengruber favored shifting Sandia labs from DOE control to DOD control. 7 was one of the main people involved in getting me fired and CAUSING THIS MESS. http://www.aci.net/kalliste/speccoll.htm http://www.aci.net/kalliste/nukearse.htm http://www.aci.net/kalliste/sandcryp.htm http://jya.com/whpfiles.htm 8 Hagengruber looks like he may have relative working at Sandia HAGENGRUBER,MICHAEL L. (505)844-0628 MLHAGEN (505)844-7284 0121 HAGENGRUBER,ROGER L. (505)844-7310 RLHAGEN (505)844-1424 1231 http://www.sandia.gov/cgi-bin/emplloc?ename=hagengruber This matter CLEARLY should be settled before it GETS WORSE! Later bill

1 0

Creating Wealth in America (36370)
by 3syute65259＠sjoki.uta.fi 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Creating Wealth In America >From the desk of Robert Allen, The Author of 2 Mega Best-Sellers, Nothing Down and Creating Wealth in America. San Diego, California 11:29 P.M. "I can't sleep until I get this off my chest." "I'm extremely frustrated." Odds are that nine out of ten people who receive this letter will discard it without a second thought. Yet, I know that I have discovered a secret that could change your financial life forever! And I'm willing to share it with you for FREE. Do you want to end your money pressures forever? Do you want to double your income? Do you want to build an extra stream of income quickly? If you answered yes, then let me show you how you can begin living your dreams, this year before it's too late. I'll get right to the point. As it says on the letterhead, my name is Robert Allen. I'm famous for my two #1 New York Times best-selling books. Nothing Down and Creating Wealth in America. There are lots of millionaires who credit their success to one of my books or seminars. So when I share this secret with you, I want you to know that I've done my homework. Here it comes. I have discovered what I believe is the perfect home-based business. Although I'm well known for real-estate investment books and seminars, this new business has absolutely nothing to do with real-estate. In fact, it's much easier and far less risky. It involves: -No employees -Little risk -Little start up cash -It's so simple, anyone can do it You could be earning $1,000 a week in as little as 90 days. One person I know went from zero to $3,000 a week in 60 days. That's $150,000 a year extra, hassle-free income! In my 20 years of research, I can honestly say, "I've never seen a faster, easier way to create a stream of income". I know this sounds too good to be true. Frankly, I didn't believe it myself at first. Finally, I agreed to check it out. As a test, I selected a small group of people and introduced them to this incredible opportunity. Almost immediately, many of them started earning profits. Within a week, many were earning incomes of $4,000 per month in net cash flow. Now, some of them are cashing checks for $3,000 a week. And this is just the beginning! Their earning potential could be unlimited! Would you like to learn how to do that? I'd love to show you how. But only if you're interested enough to make one telephone call. The number to call immediately is 1-888-572-3714. It's a 3-minute, 24-hour recorded message. This may be the answer you have been seeking. Warmly, Robert G. Allen P.S. I want to show you how to create extra streams of income quickly. Go to the phone and call now 1-888-572-3714. ****************************** 53634

1 0