December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Deaf Cons 5.9.1
by toto＠fhouse.org 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

*** The Fire House Inn *** Come visit us Telnet: fhouse.org WWW: fhouse.org ***********

1 0

Deaf Cons 5.9.2
by toto＠fhouse.org 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

*** The Fire House Inn *** Come visit us Telnet: fhouse.org WWW: fhouse.org *********** Deaf Cons 5.9.2 - SPACE ALIENS HIDE MY DRUGS!!! _______________________________________________ My SpurOfTheMomentDecision to join Forces (pardon the pun) with the RCMP in their attempts to villify me was partly the result of an interesting revelation by the Secret Service during their interview with me, partly a result of a rather disturbing discovery shortly after my construction and dissemination of a variety of VirtualNuclearDevices in Southern Saskatchewan, and a number of other interesting anomolies which led to WetDream Crescendo during my Deaf Cons 5.9 Jimi Hendrix Experience. I had constructed a variety of VirtualNuclearDevices which utilized such rEvolutionary VirtualConcepts as MasonJars full of water, containing Metallica tapes/albums, representing HeavyWater, Dildos and Chocolate Donuts, which served as the PlutoUraniumCynicalAss, soon to become, by virtue of SyphlitticDecay, a CriticalMass given by excommunicated GayCatholicPriests who were BadMouthing the Pope, without swallowing. (As well as a plethora of other Half-Life/Half-Meaningful Cymbals of AtomicSavagery intended as a SlightlyOverTheHeadOfMentalMidgets HINT!!! to the RCMP that They (TM) could FuckAllOfTheSheepleSomeOfTheTime, and FuckSomeOfTheSheepleAllOfTheTime, but, as the Tim C. May Vernacular Translation of the Bible plainly states, "Truth (TCM) is a TwoEdgedDick," and "It is easier for a needle to pass through the scarred veins of a Junkie, than for a member of a ThreeLetterSecretGovernmentAgency to pass enough water on themselves to keep from BurningInHell." Fitting A Round PsychoKiller Into A Square MadBomber Profile: "Being framed is the sincerest form of flattery." ~Lee Harvey Oswald Less than a mile south of the Canadian Border, as I was going through the leather computer bag which had contained the Virtual Nuclear Devices I had recently dropped off, I found a live ShotGunShell in a container much like those I had used to construct parts of the devices. I immediately flashed back to the face of the 'retired' US Air Force Intelligence Agent who had passed by my house in Bienfait that morning, as I was leaving, and who seemed unable to look his OldDrinkingBuddy in the eye, instead casting a GuiltyGaze toward the ground and walking just a little bit faster... When the Secret Service dropped a reference to 'gasoline' being a part of the make-up of 'bombs' being attributed to me in the Great White Snort, and articles began showing up in the Tucson NewsRags about mysterious 'gasoline bombs' being discovered in Tucson, I got the uneasy feeling that the identity of the UnknownIndividual involved had been decided well in advance of the 'discovery' of the devices. After the Secret Service had gone through my truck, with my full permission, undoubtedly observing the McDonald Observatory pamphlet that I had picked up on my last TruthMonger SoftTarget Tour Of Ameridca, an article in the Tuscon NewsRags a few day later pointed out that a ten-million dollar telescope/mirror was being moved to a more secure location in order to prevent sabotage. Once again, I could distinctly smell Villification in the air. Everywhere I go lately, from Tucson to Vegas, Nogales to Bullhead City, I seem to be encountering both Metal&PlasticBadge LEAs who threaten me with documented instances of my guilt from the Proverbial DogAtLarge CrimesAgainstHumanity, to a plethora of other Illegal/Villainous crimes such as Animal Abuse, Bomb Threats, Death Threats, Suspicion Of Intent To Have A Bad Attitude, EtAl, AdInfinituum--all without ever seeming to actually have anything to charge me with, per se. Can you say 'Villification'...sure, you can... In 1969, after being charged with possession of a single joint, in Yorkton, Saskatchewan, I found myself, after having driven for years without receiving any tickets for traffic infractions, hauled up in front of the judge who would be deciding my fate on the drug charge, as the result of a dozen or so minor traffic offenses. By the time I went to court on the drug charge, I might as well have been wearing a prison uniform and holding a MugShotNumberCard under my chin, since I was more of a standard court fixture than much of the furniture in the courtroom. The more the JackBoot in your back changes, the more it remains the same... While working on the US Customs computer system during the late a970's, I pulled up my computer profile, with the customs officer watching me unaware that it was my file, since he knew me only as C.J. Parker. When I pointed to a particular notation in the file and asked what it meant, he laughed and said it was a ThinlyVeiledNotice to those reading it that, "If you get a chance to Fuck this guy, Fuck him *good*." Comforting... Things in American Law Enforcement and the American Justice System are reaching the point where it would be a DogSend to merely have "a few good men doing nothing," so that Evil would Prevail at a less rapid pace than it is currently doing. The multitude of BadMen doing Evil, yet portraying themselves as the DefendersOfFreedomAndJustice, has reached proportions where the Citizenry, were they not so Numbed&Stupified by the DailyTorrents of DoubleSpeak, DoubleStandards and DoubleDealing by RecognizedAuthority, would rise up against the ArmedOppressors with such violence as to make the Somalian people defending their homes and neighborhood against the ArmedInvaders of the GreatestOppressiveDemocracyInTheWorld look like schoolchildren playing games. Maybe we need to drag the bodies of AmerikanOppressors through American streets. Maybe we need to bomb our own embassies, at home. Maybe we need to defend ourselves against our HomeGrown Oppressors every bit as Valiently as those in Foreign Lands who must find it incredulous that our GreatLeaders can express such surprise that UnGrateful Foreign Wretches shoot back at our troops and bomb our embassies when we engage in ArmedInvasions of their HomeLands in order to impress upon them that, "We're from a Democratic Government and we're here to *help* you--EVEN IF IT MEANS KILLING EVERY LAST ONE OF YOU IGNORANT, FOREIGN SAVAGES!!!"

1 0

Deaf Cons 5.9.1
by toto＠fhouse.org 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

*** The Fire House Inn *** Come visit us Telnet: fhouse.org WWW: fhouse.org *********** Deaf Cons 5.9.1 - SPACE ALIENS HIDE MY DRUGS!!! _________________________________________________________ [EditWhore's Left Note: The Author, once again finding HimOrHerSelf hounded by the Hounds of Hell from anything remotely resembling a functional computer system, is once again composing HerOrHis SPAMOLOGIES on a Sperry Type 3070-02 computer with 128K of RAM, which seems to be capable of adequately storing only about a page and a half of text at any given point in time, even using a rudimentary editor such as edlin. The Reader need not fear, however, that this small setback will keep the Author from generating HisOrHer UsualQuantity of USDA DisApproved SPAM and flinging it in the general direction of the CypherPunks Disturbed Male LISP, although this, what may indeed be the final chapter of SAHMD, will undoubtedly be sent to the list in thinly-sliced servings, suitable for serving as SnackFood at CypherPunks Physical Meetings, labeled as TruthMonger Caviar.] [Arthur's Right Nut: After having had tens of thousands of dollars worth of computer hardware and software stolen from me by various LEAs, as a result of being so uncouth as to refer to the Government Penis (TM) being inserted into the BungHoles of the Citizenry a 'BIG HAIRY DICK,' I found it rather amusing to have an attendee of Deaf Cons 6.0 (for *some* of the people, who made it to the end of the conference) inform me that he had been following 'The True Story Of The InterNet' manuscripts, and was disappointed in the "erratic quality of the finished product." I replied, with as straight a face as possible, that I, myself, had recently received a SnailMail correspondence from Kevin Mittnick, but had thrown it in the garbage without reading it, since I found the quality of the prison stationary it was written on to be substandard. As well, since it appeared that the BumsRush/NoseFirstIntoThePavement that I received from Plaza Hotel Security was the result of being RattedOut for some ImaginedCrime (TM) by a Deaf Cons 6.0 staff member who somehow felt that I, as a CommonCitizen, was not entitled to provide the same type of falsified evidence against myself as the RCMP are currently manufacturing. I was tempted, upon making my exit to suggest to the staff member that Kevin Mittnick (a Deaf Cons DemiGod) would be making an appearance later, and should also be RattedOut, in the interest of preventing the attendees from being cast in a bad light by their association with him.] Bottom Line: "It's a Predatorial Universe..." My journey to Deaf Cons 6.0 was actually for the purpose of having a chat with <erewhon(a)dis.org>, in regard to the interest that the Secret Service seemed to show in my <hee-hee> personal <ha-ha> email correspondence with him over the InterNet. I had actually *gambled* my way to Lost Wages, having had a dream about Castles and such, then going to the DoubleDiamondCasino in Tucson, and turning $20.00 into $100.00, on a quarter slot-mnachine with knights and castles, etc., in order to get travelling money. Once at Deaf Cons 6.0, I found out that the individual I was seeking had short-cropped hair, with an Atom tattoo'd (?) on the back of hisskull. One of the DoorMen/Staff was kind enough to provide me with an Pass, in order to help me locate AtomHead. (My lack of success in doing so might will have been due to my inability to refrain from exercising my sick sense of humor, informing people, "Tell him that I have a warrant for him.") Having had all of my offers to provide anyone interested with a password into the Royal Canadian Mounted Police computer system rebuffed, even having gone so far as to offer disks containing an RCMP BackDoor as prizes at the conference, I decided to change my plans and just give away the SonsOfBitches at random, accompanied with the advice that, since the floppies had my fingerprints all over them, and they contained LjEA WaterMarks identifying them as disks created on my personal computer system, they would make ideal 'Evidence' to be left behind at the scene of "bizarre and meaningless crimes," such as bombing the rubble the former Murrah Federal Building in OKC. My parting words to the BlessedRecipients of my QuestionableGifts was, "Since the RCMP's attempts to set me up are RatherLame (TM), I figure that I ought to do what I can to help them out, since, anything they can do, I can do better." [Note From The Author:Besides using the conference as an opportunity to engage in my continuing, tireless efforts at SelfDegradation, I also took the time to help out one of our fellow CypherPunks, Lucky Green, who was a featured speaker at Deaf Cons 6.0. Realizing that none of the attendees were likely to show much interest in such a boring and arcane subject as SmartCards, I told everyone I encountered that Lucky's lecture had been canceled, and that, in its place, I would be giving a lecture entitled, "How I Broke PGP," although I stressed that I would not be providing any specific details, because if I shared the secrets I learned in my Grade 4 math class with just GodAndEverybody, then EncryptionAsWeKnowIt would suffer a devastating blow from which it might never recover. Although I was given the BumsRush out of the building just as Lucky was taking the stage, I am certain that he probably weathered the catcalls and hurled objects quite well, eventually winning over the angry mob that had gathered.]

1 0

Deaf Cons 5.9.3
by toto＠fhouse.org 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

*** The Fire House Inn *** Come visit us Telnet: fhouse.org WWW: fhouse.org *********** Deaf Cons 5.9.3 - SPACE ALIENS HIDE MY DRUGS!!! _______________________________________________ Rob Brezsny''s Horoscopes / Week of August 6-12: Taurus (APRIL 20-MAY 20):Some Jews regard their houses as a more sacred place of worship than the synagogue. Many pagans feel no need to confine their celebrations to any special building, but offer their prayers to the earth and sky. Several Zen Buddhists I've known have claimed they're as likely to find enlightenment while microwaving a burrito under the flourescent lights of a convenience store as when meditating on a straw mat in a monastery. In the spirit of these seekers, Taurus, I exhort you to look for divine inspiration in both the strangest and most familiar places this week--anywhere other than where it's "supposed" to be. Since I have been OfficiallyExhorted to seek divine inspiration in "both the strangest and familiar places," I guess this is as good a time as any to KILL two LarryBirds with one WindowPaneStone, and seek DivineInspiration in a place that is both strange and familiar to me--TheOtherSideOfMadness (TM). Since my efforts to SaveTheLifeOfAMillionSingleInnocentChildren, by going to great lengths to research and deal with my various physical/mental/emotional infirmities to the best of my ability, have been constantly thwarted by a variety of Officially Recognized Authorities who have taken it upon themselves to steal and/or deny me access to the tools and techniques that I use to minimize the effects of my dsyfuntions and disabilities, I think it is time to submit to the wishes of the Controllers and cease all efforts to attempt to exercise control over my dysfunctionality in a manner that has proven successful, for the most part, to date. Accordingly, I hereby serve notice that "I Quit!" Since the Contollers seem to find it unacceptable for me to release the tension that builds in my psyche by screaming the Truth (TM) about the Villainous Nature of Mounties trained in the use of ArmedViolence casually slaughtering a FirstNations mother and the young child clinging to her skirt, for no apparent reason other than a lack of incentive to resolve a conflict peacefully, given the fact that whacking out a WagonBurnerBitch and her Future Young GlueSniffer will inevitably be found justifiable by his RCMP BumBuddies during their investigation of his murder, then I will no longer do so. Instead, I will just let the SenseOfInjustice ferment inside of me. Since Lost Wages LEA's deem it necessary for me to remove the chains securing my baggage in the back of my truck, in order to chain my dog 'legally' outside of my truck (where it is five degrees hotter than inside the truck, since I am willing to go without food to provide her with enough blocks of ice to provide her with comfort and safety), thus enabling their local junkies to go through my possessions and steal all of my medications, then far be it from me to go against their wishes for me to drift into unmedicated savagery rather than disobey the letter of laws written by Imbeciles who aren't half as smart as my dog, Baby, who immediately jumped back into the truck through the open window, dragging the chain with her, wondering why the fuck these uniformed Idiots expected her to lay on hot concrete instead of a nice, cool block of ice. (I urge you, at your next local, state and federal elections, to vote for Baby as a WriteInCandidate. In her recent TV debate with Buddy, the FirstDog, Baby told him, "I *knew* Lassie...and you're no Lassie...") Since files pulled off of the RCMP and various other Canadian Government computer systems indicate their desire to apply pressure to me while I am in a state of under-medication they might find this an opportune time to once again engage in their spurious activities (all the time wearing KevlarJackets while keeping their fingers crossed that I will vent my PsychoticWrath in the directions suggested by the Bienfait Nutly News "KILL The Children!!!" Special, rather in their directionO. In effect, given the apparent unacceptability of my attempting to control the effects of my disabilities with my own time-proven tools and techiques, I will cease doing so, and allow the Controllers to accept the responsibility of providing me with the medicatopms amd tools needed to keep my dysfuntionality from becoming a problem to Society. Given the recent massive amounts of concern expressed about disabled individuals such as the gentleman who shot his way into the Hallowed Halls of the US Legislature building in DC, one might think that my future attempts to have the Controllers provide me with medication and health care, in order to help me to prevent my disability from causing unwanted consequences to the society that I live in, might be met with joyful enthusiasm. Right...and I've got some OceanFrontPropertyInTucsonArizona that has a 1500 mile sandy beach bordering on the Pacific Ocean... Congressmen...Smoke 'em if you got 'em... [Final Note From The Author:If Defcon McCullagh Chainsaw was half the ReportWhore he claims to be, he wouldn't have to ask me, "Why do you send your missives to the CypherPunks list?" The answer, "Because I am a CypherPunk." is the *short* answer. What it implies, in essence, is that the CypherPunks Distributed Mailing List is a DigitalGlobalCommunity which reflects what the InterNet Communities of the Future *should* be. GeoPhysicallyLocated MeatSpace Communities may reflect the convergence of people with similar lifestyles and values, for the most part, but they do not consist of BlackSmith communities in which only BlackSmiths live, etc. Just as a foundling country known as the United States of America was built around the idea of Freedom&Democracy in which the Citizenry was deemed to have the right to live according to a wide variety of lifestyles, with diverse religious and secular beliefs, a CypherPunks list that was founded in the interests of promoting Encryption, Privacy and Freedom would be a stark landscape, indeed, if it were only occupied by individuals with a narrow range of attitudes, mindsets, and perceptive world-views. Tim May commented in a post, at one point, that the list was poorer for the current absence of some of the more statist nay-sayers to the more common CypherPunks views and positions, particularly those who brought a modicum of thought and reason to their posts to the list. I enjoyed firing cynical, acidic salvos at Kent Crispin as much as anyone else on the list did, but I regarded him as a valuable member of the CypherPunks community--one who caused me, more than once, to recognize the value of concepts and ideas that ran contrary to my normal way of viewing life around me. Dr. Dimitri Vulis, ShitDisturberExtraordinaire, provided one of the most poignant moments in CypherPunks History by interpreting his forced unsubscribing from the list as censorship, and routing around it. I hope that John Gilmore, one of the premiere contributors to the existence of the CypherPunks Legendary Lunacy Collective, eventually looked in the mirror one morning and said, "Boy, am I a SillyAss, or what?" Even the list members who bore us with that mathematical crap, showing off just because they can count to 21 without taking off their mittens and their shoes, and pulling out their Dick, contribute to the list, by making us look good in the eyes of those who mistakenly believe that there are more important things in life than discussing Ebonics and pissing all over each other and ourselves. And where else can a WannaBeNuclearSuitcaseMadBomber ask a simple question like, "Where do I connect the 'yellow' wire?" and get a thirty-post thread discussing PlutoniumDecayRates. Is it any wonder that Robert Hettinga *loves* this list? In closing, let me remind you that: "Lassie kills chickens!" "Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana." "He who shits on the road will meet flies upon his return." ~The Author]

1 0

No Subject
by Anonymous 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

'What are you going to do, classify prime numbers?' 'There are a thousand reasons to have this with you, but mostly its for the things we can't think of' 'What interests me is that it recorded 18 hours of static...' ------All quotes from _Contact_

1 0

No Subject
by Entropy 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

please take us off the mailing list. thanks you burke bryant sysadmin(a)thegrid.net

1 0

CTIA Daily News from WOW-COM - August 13, 1998
by CTIA Daily News 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

========================================== Welcome to today's edition of the CTIA Daily News from WOW-COM. Please click on the icon / attachment for the most important news in wireless communications today. If you cannot open the icon/attachment, please visit http://www.wow-com.com/professional/ for the wireless daily news. Don't miss the major conference on implementing Phase 2 of the E-911 requirement--August 26-27 in San Francisco. For more information, click http://www.wow-com.com/pdf/locntech.pdf ===========================================

1 0

No Subject
by Entropy 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

please take us off your mailing list. our address that the mail is being sent to is: sysadmin(a)thegrid.net we appreciate your mail but the volume is slightly overwelming for us to handle.. sincerely, burke bryant

1 0

FOR PEOPLE WITH EXPENSIVE TASTES!
by serv＠juno.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

You'll fall in love with my Grandma's prize-winning salad dressing recipe. It has just the right touch of garlic, olive oil, and certain other old-world special ingredients. Best of all, it has the power to turn ordinary iceburg lettuce into something amazing. Whenever we serve it people ask for more salad! And they look at you like, "What's in this anyway?" It's a real bargain at only $2.00! ================================================================= =========================== Please send cash or make check or money order payable to RECIPES BY GRANDMA and mail along with your email address to: RECIPES BY GRANDMA POST OFFICE BOX 296 MARLBOROUGH, CONNECTICUT 06447 Be sure to include YOUR email address!

1 0

Re: your mail
by HyperReal-Anon 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On Thu, 13 Aug 1998, Entropy wrote: > > please take us off your mailing list. > > our address that the mail is being sent to is: sysadmin(a)thegrid.net > we appreciate your mail but the volume is slightly overwelming for us to > handle.. > sincerely, burke bryant > > Take yourself off, you mental midget.

2 1

Re: your mail
by HyperReal-Anon 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> On 13 Aug 1998, HyperReal-Anon wrote: > > > > our address that the mail is being sent to is: sysadmin(a)thegrid.net > > > we appreciate your mail but the volume is slightly overwelming for us to > > > handle.. > > > sincerely, burke bryant > > > > > > > > > > Take yourself off, you mental midget. > > Come now. Is there any reason to insult midgets by comparing them to > this guy? :) Quite right. Most vertically-challenged individuals are upstanding members of society and of at least average intelligence. They don't deserve to be compared to this guy. :) I would call him a moron, but then I'd be insulting morons.

1 0

http://209.1.31.51/98/8/13/
by STUFFED/EUREKA! 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Welcome to today's issue of Stuffed. To read it you should click on the URL below. If it is not made clickable by your email program you will need to use your mouse to highlight the line, copy it and then paste it into your browser (then press Return). http://209.1.31.51/98/8/13/ If you have an email program that can display web pages you will find today's front cover should have already been disp- layed and can be clicked on to take you straight to Stuffed. This email is never sent unsolicited. Stuffed is the supplement for the Eureka newsletter you subscribed to. Full instructions on unsubscribing are in every issue of Eureka!

1 0

No Subject
by Entropy 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 06:37 PM 8/13/98 -0700, you wrote: > >> On 13 Aug 1998, HyperReal-Anon wrote: >> >> > > our address that the mail is being sent to is: sysadmin(a)thegrid.net The interesting fact here is that you all seem to have nothing better to do with your time than converse over something so petty as an address error..... I think you need to re-evaluate who the mental midgets are..... I would hope the future of our world isn't in the hands of such petty people such as yourselves... > > > we appreciate your mail but the volume is slightly overwelming for us to >> > > handle.. >> > > sincerely, burke bryant >> > > >> > > >> > >> > Take yourself off, you mental midget. >> >> Come now. Is there any reason to insult midgets by comparing them to >> this guy? :) > >Quite right. Most vertically-challenged individuals are upstanding members >of society and of at least average intelligence. They don't deserve to be >compared to this guy. :) > >I would call him a moron, but then I'd be insulting morons. >

1 0

Re: sysadmin@thegrid.net
by ILovToHack＠aol.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> >> On 13 Aug 1998, HyperReal-Anon wrote: >> >> > > our address that the mail is being sent to is: sysadmin(a)thegrid.net The interesting fact here is that you all seem to have nothing better to do with your time than converse over something so petty as an address error..... I think you need to re-evaluate who the mental midgets are..... I would hope the future of our world isn't in the hands of such petty people such as yourselves... > > > we appreciate your mail but the volume is slightly overwelming for us to >> > > handle.. >> > > sincerely, burke bryant >> > > >> > > >> > >> > Take yourself off, you mental midget. >> >> Come now. Is there any reason to insult midgets by comparing them to >> this guy? :) > >Quite right. Most vertically-challenged individuals are upstanding members >of society and of at least average intelligence. They don't deserve to be >compared to this guy. :) > >I would call him a moron, but then I'd be insulting morons. > Come on thake it easy on the guy at least he aint on AOL or somthing stuped.

1 0

Re: your mail
by HyperReal-Anon 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On Thu, 13 Aug 1998, Entropy wrote: > > At 06:37 PM 8/13/98 -0700, you wrote: > > > >> On 13 Aug 1998, HyperReal-Anon wrote: > >> > >> > > our address that the mail is being sent to is: sysadmin(a)thegrid.net > The interesting fact here is that you all seem to have nothing better to do > with your time than converse over something so petty as an address error..... > I think you need to re-evaluate who the mental midgets are..... > I would hope the future of our world isn't in the hands of such petty > people such as yourselves... > > It's more like making an example out of yet another moron who doesn't have a clue where to send. You're tempting because you advertise that you're a sysadmin. I'll remember to never do business with your company.

1 0

Own a complete adult site for $19.95
by reply＠adultcontent4u.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Want to Make Money on the Internet? Start Your Own ADULT WEB SITE for only $19.95... with Quik Site! * We supply Hosting and Credit Card Processing. * We supply Content... Nothing to Set-Up or Upload. * We give you High Quality Video Feeds! * Hot Chatroom for your Site! * We give you Original Photos featuring Gorgeous Models! * We do all the Work... YOU MAKE THE MONEY! Design your own Adult Site online in 10 Minutes and START MAKING MONEY TONIGHT! Absolutely NO OTHER CHARGES involved in making these sites! http://www.adultsiteservices.com/cquiksite If you would like to be removed from this list please send a message to: remove(a)adultcontent4u.com and put the word REMOVE in the SUBJECT

1 0

Now is the Time! National Credit Card Accounts!
by fiy46＠werker.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

<A HREF="http://www.remove-list.com/">Click here to be removed from future mailing</A> NO CREDIT TURN-DOWNS Now you can accept Credit Card Payment On Your Website - Do you sell a product or service? - Would you like to sell anything on the Internet? 98% of all internet sales are made with Credit Cards Call 1-800-899-2218 - You can process credit cards right from your computer - Funds are directly deposited into your checking account 24 - 48 hours from the time of purchase!! Now that is FAST Did you know, Internet shopping is DOUBLING every 100 days You see, there are really only 2 types of people on the internet, those who spend money, and those who make money. WHICH CATEGORY WILL YOU BE IN ???? Call 1-800-899-2218 GET YOUR MERCHANT ACCOUNT TODAY!!! <HTML><PRE><BODY BGCOLOR="#80ffff"><a href="http://www.remove-list.com/">Click here to be removed from future mailing</A> NO CREDIT TURN-DOWNS Now you can accept Credit Card Payment On Your Website - Do you sell a product or service? - Would you like to sell anything on the Internet? 98% of all internet sales are made with Credit Cards Call 1-800-899-2218 - You can process credit cards right from your computer - Funds are directly deposited into your checking account 24 - 48 hours from the time of purchase!! Now that is FAST Did you know, Internet shopping is DOUBLING every 100 days You see, there are really only 2 types of people on the internet, those who spend money, and those who make money. WHICH CATEGORY WILL YOU BE IN ???? Call 1-800-899-2218 GET YOUR MERCHANT ACCOUNT TODAY!!! </PRE></HTML> Thank You

1 0

Dennis Rodman hounded by porn stars/Mom dates alien son http://stuffed.net/98/8/14/
by STUFFED/EUREKA! 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Welcome to today's issue of Stuffed. To read it you should click on the URL below. If it is not made clickable by your email program you will need to use your mouse to highlight the line, copy it and then paste it into your browser (then press Return). http://stuffed.net/98/8/14/ If you have an email program that can display web pages you will find today's front cover should have already been disp- layed and can be clicked on to take you straight to Stuffed. This email is never sent unsolicited. Stuffed is the supplement for the Eureka newsletter you subscribed to. Full instructions on unsubscribing are in every issue of Eureka!

1 0

No Subject
by Anonymous 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

CLINTON/STARR SCRAMBLED Wed Aug 12 1998 23:34:51 UTC-- An extraordinary communications security blanket will be in place for President Clinton's grand jury showdown on Monday. One of the hottest telecasts in American history will be scrambled with the latest encryption technology and put on a special fiber-optic line from the White House to the courtroom, the DALLAS MORNING NEWS reports in Thursday editions. Hacker beware: Intercepting the president's testimony could fall under wiretapping statutes as a felony, reports the paper. Tech workers, claiming to be from a Virginia cable company, visited the federal courthouse early week. One court watcher explains that the cover didn't work: "It was obvious that the guys were not with 'Virginia Cable' but were from the FBI or some other government agency... setting it all up." Starr is expected to personally question Clinton during the session... "[T]errorists are the only true avant-garde artists because they're the only ones who are still capable of really surprising people." (Delillo q.v. Laurie Anderson 1994: 222)

1 0

CTIA Daily News from WOW-COM - August 14, 1998
by CTIA Daily News 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

========================================== Welcome to today's edition of the CTIA Daily News from WOW-COM. Please click on the icon / attachment for the most important news in wireless communications today. If you cannot open the icon/attachment, please visit http://www.wow-com.com/professional/ for the wireless daily news. Don't miss the major conference on implementing Phase 2 of the E-911 requirement--August 26-27 in San Francisco. For more information, click http://www.wow-com.com/pdf/locntech.pdf ===========================================

1 0

Sandia Scraps Guided Nuclear Bomb Project
by bill payne 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Friday 8/14/98 11:21 AM J Orlin Grabbe http://www.aci.net/kalliste/ The ABQ JOURNAL f 8/14,1998 front page article Sandia Scraps Guided Nuclear Bomb Project Lab Says Design Work Was Just an Exercise By John Fleck Journal Staff Writer Sandia National Laboratories has shut down an effort to design a guided nuclear bomb that critics say was aimed at Third World targets. Sandia pulled the plug because of controversy over the fact that the lab never received permission for the project from senior levels of the Clinton administration, said Sandia vice president Roger Hagengruber. ... is interesting from another standpoint. Article ends with "We have no plans to resurrect the program in fiscal year '99 or any year beyond that," said Sandia spokesman Larry Perrine. Perrine is now married to Renea Dietz of the former Sandia President Al Narth and then Lockheed Martin VP notoriety. I attach Friday November 15, 1996 14:01 Ms. GayLa D. Sessoms, Director FOAI/Privacy Act Division Office of the Executive Secretariat The Secretary of Energy United States Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 Here they are PERRINE,LARRY G. (505)845-8511 LGPERRI (505)844-1392 0167 PERRINE,RENAE J. (505)284-2824 RJPERRI (505)844-6953 0724 http://www.sandia.gov/cgi-bin/emplloc?ename=perrine I received a profane phone call from Larry and Renea Perrine after our letter to Sessoms hit the Infobhan. I recorded it, of course. Narath's third wife is still on the Sandia payroll NARATH,SHANNA S. (505)284-2198 SSNARAT (505)844-6501 0168 http://www.sandia.gov/cgi-bin/emplloc?ename=narath Morales knows Perrine fairly well. Morales told me he had Perrine USED TO have lunch together. Orlin, it appears you have correctly measured the capabilities of SOME OF those running this county. http://www.aci.net/kalliste/apocalyp.htm Perhaps it is time to GET RID OF THEM and settle this UNFORTUNATE MATTER, of course. Later bill For all of our recollection Friday 8/14/98 9:06 AM John Young http://www.jya.com/index.htm J Orlin Grabbe http://www.aci.net/kalliste/ Roger Hagengruber is making news http://www.abqjournal.com/scitech/1sci8-14.htm Hagengruber 1 was Jim Durham's office mate when Hagengruber was new at Sandia. H. B. Durham who served as project leader http://jya.com/da/whpda.htm 2 was C William Childers' boss 3 was James Gosler's boSs 4 was Paul Stokes' boss Originator: Paul A. Stokes Date: 4/28/92 http://jya.com/da/whpda.htm 5 encouraged Sandia to do more 'work for others' projects like for the FBI and NSA. This includes the 'spiking work' for NSA. http://www.aci.net/kalliste/ricono.htm http://www.qainfo.se/~lb/crypto_ag.htm http://caq.com/cryptogate 6 told employees that Hagengruber favored shifting Sandia labs from DOE control to DOD control. 7 was one of the main people involved in getting me fired and CAUSING THIS MESS. http://www.aci.net/kalliste/speccoll.htm http://www.aci.net/kalliste/nukearse.htm http://www.aci.net/kalliste/sandcryp.htm http://jya.com/whpfiles.htm 8 Hagengruber looks like he may have relative working at Sandia HAGENGRUBER,MICHAEL L. (505)844-0628 MLHAGEN (505)844-7284 0121 HAGENGRUBER,ROGER L. (505)844-7310 RLHAGEN (505)844-1424 1231 http://www.sandia.gov/cgi-bin/emplloc?ename=hagengruber This matter CLEARLY should be settled before it GETS WORSE! Later bill For all of our recollection Friday 8/14/98 9:06 AM John Young http://www.jya.com/index.htm J Orlin Grabbe http://www.aci.net/kalliste/ Roger Hagengruber is making news http://www.abqjournal.com/scitech/1sci8-14.htm Hagengruber 1 was Jim Durham's office mate when Hagengruber was new at Sandia. H. B. Durham who served as project leader http://jya.com/da/whpda.htm 2 was C William Childers' boss 3 was James Gosler's boSs 4 was Paul Stokes' boss Originator: Paul A. Stokes Date: 4/28/92 http://jya.com/da/whpda.htm 5 encouraged Sandia to do more 'work for others' projects like for the FBI and NSA. This includes the 'spiking work' for NSA. http://www.aci.net/kalliste/ricono.htm http://www.qainfo.se/~lb/crypto_ag.htm http://caq.com/cryptogate 6 told employees that Hagengruber favored shifting Sandia labs from DOE control to DOD control. 7 was one of the main people involved in getting me fired and CAUSING THIS MESS. http://www.aci.net/kalliste/speccoll.htm http://www.aci.net/kalliste/nukearse.htm http://www.aci.net/kalliste/sandcryp.htm http://jya.com/whpfiles.htm 8 Hagengruber looks like he may have relative working at Sandia HAGENGRUBER,MICHAEL L. (505)844-0628 MLHAGEN (505)844-7284 0121 HAGENGRUBER,ROGER L. (505)844-7310 RLHAGEN (505)844-1424 1231 http://www.sandia.gov/cgi-bin/emplloc?ename=hagengruber This matter CLEARLY should be settled before it GETS WORSE! Later bill Friday November 15, 1996 14:01 Ms. GayLa D. Sessoms, Director FOAI/Privacy Act Division Office of the Executive Secretariat The Secretary of Energy United States Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 Dear Ms Sessoms: Purposes of this letter are; 1 a have the Department of Energy deliver lawfully requested information due us under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) o legal bills o military double-dipper employees o husband/wife employees o Sandia president Al Narath's use of taxpayer money to fund Narath's sex life at Sandia Labs. b show that we have exhausted all administrative remedies in our attempt to obtain this information, 2 reason with you as to the futility of DOE's attempt to resist our lawful inquiries, 3 and set a time for our filing our lawful, disruptive, expensive, damaging FOIA lawsuit if, of course, DOE is un-swayed by logic. October 25 you wrote, Thank you for your October 2, 1996, correspondence addressed to Secretary O'Leary. In you letter you requested the following information under the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act: 1. Names, dates of employment, current salaries of all husband/wife combinations who work at Sandia Laboratories as of December 5, 1995; and 2. Names, dates of employment, current salaries of all husband/wife combinations who work at DOE/ALOO Laboratories as of December 5, 1995. You go on to state, Pursuant to 10 CFR 1004.8, the adequacy of this search for responsive documents may be appealed to the Director of Hearings and Appeals, HG-1, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20585-0107. Please include a concise statement of the grounds for the appeal, a description of the relief sought, and attach a copy of this correspondence. The appeal to the Director must be made within 30 calendar days after your receipt of this letter. ... Our October 2 letter stated, to appeal a denial of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request; Ms Sessoms, our October 2 letter was an APPEAL directed to Energy Secretary. NOT a FOIA. And, we can appeal to the Secretary of Energy, not the Director of Hearings and Appeals, as you direct. Whenever a FOIA request is denied, the agency must inform the requester of the reasons for the denial and the requester's right to appeal the denial to the head of the agency. [FOIA GUIDE Congressional and Administrative News, September 1989] Ms Sessoms, you appear to want us to appeal an APPEAL. The above arguments we believe satisfies purpose 1b. We have exhausted all administrative remedies. You attempt to justify not giving us documents DOE apparently has in its possession regarding husband/wife employees with the argument, The Department of Energy (DOE) maintains the Pay/Pers Payroll System which contains employment related data for all DOE employees. However, the system does not cross reference or otherwise identify employees married to one another. Therefore, we are unable to provide the information responsible to your request. But there are OTHER documents which apparently DO contain reference to employees married to one another, we are told. But this leads to purpose 2: husband/wife employees. Let's look at reason we are requesting these documents, On Tuesday December 12, 1995 09:44 Payne wrote, During this time of corporate down-sizing many Americans are losing their jobs, perhaps even their homes as a result. Americans are sensitive, especially in these times, to those abuse the government system for personal financial profit. DOE has refused to release the number and names of retired military double-dippers who work at Sandia and Los Alamos. Like Sandia ethics director and retired general Jack Dickey. Equally offensive to military double-dippers in time of shrinking employment are husband/wife combinations both employed by DOE, Sandia, and Los Alamos. This is especially true if there are some improprieties involved in employment and promotions. And our October 2, 1996 contains the information, Wednesday September 28 Payne received a letter containing more information about husband/wife. In summary, 1 Harry and Delores Season Harry was a high-level ALOO employee (assistant manager?) Delores is a GS-14. Harry recently retired and went to work for Sandia National Laboratories! 2 Tim and Brenda Harmeson Brenda is Acting Manager, KAO (Gm-15). Tim is a staff person at ALOO, likely a GS-13. 3 Mike Zamorski and Phyllis Romero Mike is Acting Deputy Manager, KAO. Phyllis recently left DOE employment. 4 Ron and Gloria O'Dowd Ron is a GM-15 supervisory attorney at ALOO. O'Dowd reports to DOE/ALOO chief counsel Tyler Przybylek. O'Dowd processes FOIA requests. Like the one Payne is appealing in this letter. Gloria also works at DOE/ALOO. 5 Rush and Gloria Inlow DOE AL News, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ALBUQUERQUE OPERATIONS OFFICE, Aug 23, 1996 reports, Rush Inlow will serve as AL's Deputy Manager Energy Secretary Hazel O'Leary has announced that Rush Inlow will become Deputy Manager of the Albuquerque Operations Office on Aug. 25. Inlow replaced James W. Culpepper, who retired May 1, 1996 and Tyler Przybylek, who has served as acting Deputy Manager in the interim. Letter Payne received on September 28 said that Gloria inlow is retiring September 30, 1996. Gloria Inlow apparently expressed resentment that she was MADE to retire because it was a conflict of interest for her to work for her husband, Rush Inlow. Inlows' estimated yearly income is in excess of $200,000. Gloria inlow is apparently going to come back to work a KAO as a contractor employee! Secretary O'Leary, it sounds as if your newly appointed Deputy Manager, Rush Inlow, is attempting to subvert nepotism rules. Purpose 2: military double-dippers. Payne wrote, Retired military personnel are going to work for Sandia National Laboratories. Not only do these individuals draw generous military retirement pay but they have a large income from Sandia. They are government "double dippers." Retired military who do not work for Sandia observe that almost all those retired military hired by Sandia were administrators in the military. Not technical military workers. Code of Ethics & Standards of Conduct of Sandia National Laboratories, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation states, "The perception of impropriety by Sandians can be as damaging to Sandia as would be the commission of the perceived offense." "Refrain from offering or providing Government personnel with improper gratuities, ...", "Carefully avoid any situation which will compromise Sandia's competitive position or result in a potential conflict of interest." page 5. Perhaps giving retired military high-paying jobs while double dipping from the government might be considered an improper gratuity? And influence-buying with the military might be considered a conflict of interest? If it were the case that Sandia was influence-buying with the military instead of hiring the most capable individuals, then this would be a matter of national security concern. Los Alamos National Laboratories rejection letter is dated SEP 29 1995. It reads, This letter is the final response to your September 12, 1995, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for the following information: "Names and date of employment of all retired military personnel who were hired by Los Alamos National Laboratory between the dated of October 1, 1979, and September 12, 1995." The Office of Public Affairs, Albuquerque Operations Office, contacted the Los Alamos Area Office (LAAO) about your request. The LLAO states that the records you are seeking are contained in personnel files in the possession and control of the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), and are therefore, not 'agency records' subject to provision of the FOIA. 'Agency records' are defined as records in federal agencies' possession and control at the time of the FOIA request. However, pursuant to U.S. Department of Energy policy, records in the possession such as LANL, will be made available by DOE when the contract specifically provides that such records are the property of the Government. The contract between the DOE and LANL, managed by the University of California, clearly defines personnel files such as requested by you as being the property of the contractor. Accordingly, these records are not subject to release under DOE policy as well. DOE rejection letter dated August 21 by David L. Geary, signing for Elva Barfield, states, The SNL, through the Kirtland Area Office, has advised they don't have any existing records that identify retired military personnel. Therefore, there are no responsive records to your request." Not only this this statement false, it smacks of a cover-up of misconduct. Records in Sandia's personnel office list previous employment. On Wednesday August 23, 1995 06:29 I faxed Tom Carpenter of the Government Accountability Project, Sandia Lab News, August 18, 1995, page 8 reported with a picture of Dickey, "(Sandia's ethics director [Jack Dickey] and retired air force brigadier general, ..." Ethics director Dickey is identified by the Lab News as a double-dipper. Perhaps the Lab News is trying to blow the whistle again? My FOIA denial appears to be a MAJOR COVER UP of impropriety at Sandia. I will appeal, of course. Not only is Sandia's hiring retired military personnel probably improper but may be an attempt to undermine the Department of Energy's control of the National Laboratories through "Work for Others" programs. August 28, 1995 Payne appeals the above FOIA rejections to Hazel R. O'Leary. The military double-dipper information is withheld despite O'Leary's statement, Secretary O'Leary acknowledged that a DOE refusal to provide documents in response to a Freedom of Information Act request that is clearly within the law was "INEXCUSABLE. [DOE review, Vol 1.1, March '94] Ms Sessoms, we believe that DOE, Sandia, and Los Alamos HAVE RECORDS of military double-dipper. We HAVE a document published by Lockheed Martin showing that the Department of Defense (DOD) REQUIRES reporting military double-dippers to DOD! And we will present this document and other to the court showings that DOE, Sandia, and Los Alamos statements about NOT POSSESSING military double-dipper records IS A LIE. If necessary, of course. Purpose 2: legal bills. February 1, 1996 Payne writes Charles Przybylek, Chief Counsel, U. S. Department of Energy, Albuquerque Operations Office (ALOO), A Freedom of Information Act rejection letter dated January 24, 1996 for, All invoices submitted to Sandia National Laboratories defending against Morales' lawsuit between May 1, 1991 and August 1, 1995. and invoices submitted to Sandia National Laboratories by the law firm of Simons, Cuddy and Friedman between March 1, 1994 and June 1, 1995. appears to be written by a lawyer. But the letter was signed by Freedom of Information Officer, Elva Ann Barfield. The reason Barfield appears not to have written this letter is that DOE employees Elva Barfield and Gwen Schreiner of the Albuquerque Operations office and senior attorney Ann Augustyn of DOE Hearing and appeals forced Sandia to reveal that Friedman collected over $120,000 from about January 1, 1993 until March 1, 1994 defending against my lawsuit. And I are currently attempting to obtain the remainder of Friedman's bills. The total paid to Friedman to defend against my lawsuit is estimated to be $250,000 December 13, 1994 DOE/AL FOIA officer Gwen Schreiner waived fees for the reason, We have considered your request and have determined that release of the requested records is in the public interest, that disclosure of this information is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of the operations or activities of the government, that you or the organization you represent have little or no commercial interest in the material contained in the records, that you or the organization you represent have the qualifications and ability to use and disseminate the information, and that the records are not currently in the public domain. A waiver of fees is therefore granted. Morales lawsuits cost Sandia/DOE far more than mine. Morales has been in a court trial at least once. I have never been to court, even for your spending about $250,000! ... Gar Alperowitz in, The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb and the architecture of an American myth, Alfred Knopf, 1995 writes, As modern disclosures ordered by Energy Secretary Hazel O'Leary concerning human radiation experiments suggest such classification provision helped foster a climate in which government officials were virtually exempt from public accountability", page 614. Now it appears that DOE\ALOO and Sandia Labs attempts to conceal the amount of money both spent on lawyers. ... But now in the rejection of the request for the remainder of the legal bills dated January 24, DOE has changed its mind about further release of legal bill information. Although you intended use of the records in more consistent with a determination that you are a "commercial use" requester, we have decided to process your request as an "all other requester" (please refer to my letter to you dated August 1, 1995) which entitles you to two hours of search time and the first one hundred page of reproduction free of charge per request. In your request you ask you be contacted before processing your requests if there would be any fees for searching for or copying the requested records. This office has been advised by the Kirtland Area Office and the Sandia National Laboratories/New Mexico of the estimated charges for the processing of your requests. The total estimated charges for both requests (95-139-B and 95-175-C) are between $100 and $500. Before we can continue to process your request, we must have your agreement to pay the fees associated with the search and production of the documents. If you wish to modify your requests to reduce the amount of anticipated fees, please advise the office in writing by February 7, 1996. If you do not hear from you by February 7, 1996, we will consider your request withdrawn and will close the files. Wednesday February 28, 1996 we warn Przybylek of an impending lawsuit if the legal bill documents are not forthcoming. Dear lawyer Przybylek: You wrote me on FEB 21. Most of the contents of your letter were false, ambiguous, or misrepresented the facts. Purpose of this letter is to correct your letter, clarify ambiguities and misrepresentations, and convince you and others that we WILL sue ... You wrote, Reference is made to your February 1, 1996 letter to me concerning your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests seeking law firm invoice submitted to Sandia National Laboratories. Sandia National Laboratories is managed and operated for the Department of Energy by Lockheed/Martin, so I assume that you are seeking invoices submitted to that organization. Specifically, you stated that you are seeking invoices submitted to Lockheed/Martin in defense of the Morales lawsuit (Garcia/Morales) and all invoices submitted to Lockheed/Martin by the law firm of Simons, Cuddy and Friedman between March 12, 1994 and June 1, 1995. Contents of these two paragraphs are FALSE. I wrote Elva Barfield on Friday July 28, 1995, 1 All invoices submitted to Sandia National Laboratories by all law firms defending Sandia against Morales' lawsuit between May 1, 1991 and August 1, 1995. Your FALSIFICATIONS include: 1 The starting date IS May 1, 1991, NOT March 12, 1994. 2 I specified "all law firms" NOT JUST Simons, Cuddy and Friedman. 3 I DID NOT specify just Lockheed/Martin. You wrote next, Although such invoiced have been held to be exempt from public release under the provisions of the FOIA because they constitute attorney work-product under exemption 5, (The Rio Grande Sun, Case KFA-0090), the name of the law firm submitting such invoice and the total amount of the invoice has been released as a matter of policy of the DOE General Counsel. Therefore, I am treating your letter to me as a request for this information under that policy. Your above paragraph is nonsense. Exemption 5 - Internal Government Communications The FOIA's fifth exemption applies to internal government documents. An example is a letter from one government department to another about a joint decision that has not yet been made. Another example is a memorandum from an agency employee to his supervisor describing options for conducting the agency's business. The purpose of the fifth exemption is to safeguard the deliberative policy making process of government. The exemption encourages frank discussion of policy matter between agency officials by allowing supporting documents to be withheld from public disclosure. The exemption also protects against premature disclosure of policies before final adoption. [FIRST REPORT By The COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS, 1993] So, lawyer Przybylek, your conclusion about exempting legal bills from the FOIA using exemption 5 is incorrect. You cannot use exemption 5 to attempt to cover up taxpayer money misspent on legal bills. ... You wrote, Although our figures are not broken down by the dates you have referenced, I am providing the following information. The total amount of invoices submitted in the Garcia/Morales litigation as of December 31, 1995, was $567,137.00. Morales feels that this amount is too low. Morales points out that you did not include bills from the law firm of, 1 Rodey, Richardson, Sloan, Akin, and Robb between the dates of January 1, 1991 and January 29, 1993. Nor did you include bills from the law firm of, 2 Butt, Thornton, Baehr, and the law firm of, 3 Fenwick and West in California, so we guess that the amount is near DOUBLE the approximate $570,000 you write. More than $1,000,00! These records are obtained from the docket sheet. You wrote, The total amount of invoices submitted by the Simons, Cuddy, and Friedman law firm in the case of Payne v. Sandia Corp., et al was $108,341.00 as of December 31, 1995. ... So the total is more than $228,000! Legal bills sum of $228,000, of course, is absurd considering we have NEVER been to trial! ... Morales and I have cost DOE more than $1,000,000 in legal bills. Perhaps double this number! Ms Sessoms, we FOIAed Przybylek again for legal bill information. We did not receive any response to our FOIA. Ms. Sessoms, we feel that we have exhausted all of the administrative remedies available to us to obtain legal bill information. Purpose 2: Sandia president Al Narath's use of taxpayer money to fund Narath's sex life at Sandia Labs. October 30, 1996 I appealed to Hazel R. O'Leary, Dear Secretary O'Leary: Purposes of this letter is to appeal a denial of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. DOE FOIA request denial appeals, according to law, can be made to you. October 10, 1996 Michael Conley wrote, Dear Dr. Payne: This is in response to the above-referenced requests in which you sought (1) " Copies of reports of misconduct by Al Narath made by DOE's IG or other office between January 11, 1993 and November 27, 1995" and (2)"Any reports containing the name of William Payne, Bill Payne, etc. between January 11, 1993 and November November 27, 1995." With respect to you request (1) cited above, the Office of Inspector General neither confirms nor denies the existence of records responsive to you request. Lack an individual's consent, and official acknowledgment of an investigation, or an overriding public interest, even to acknowledge the existence of such pertaining to an individual could be reasonably be expected to constitute and unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Refer to 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(7)(C). With respect to you request (2) cited above, we would note that our records do contain responses by the Office of Inspector General to you regarding your previous Freedom of Information Act requests, numbers 93120302 and 951221001. In addition, the Office of Investigations, Office of Inspector General, will be responding to your request (2) as part of its response to your FOIA request number 95112002. This decision may be appealed with 30 calendar days of your receipt of this determination pursuant to 10 C.F.R. 1004.8. Appeals should be addressed to the: Director Office of Hearing and Appeals Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave, SW Washington, D.C. 20595 Thereafter, judicial review will be available to you in the federal district court either (1) in the district where you reside, (2) where you have your principal place of business, (3) where the Department's records are situated or (4) in the District of Columbia. Sincerely, Michael W. Conley Deputy Inspector General for Inspections Office of Inspector General. I appeal this denial. Sandia president Al Narath was apprehended in an act of sexual penetration with his administrative assistant, Renea Dietz in about 1992. Narath lost his security clearances, briefly, over this incident. Narath's second wife, Barbara, also divorced Narath, in part, over this incident. Dietz was promoted to an administrative position at Sandia. Shanna Lindeman divorced her husband. Lindeman was appointed to a division supervisor position at Sandia. Lindeman was the only employee in her division. Narath and Lindeman later married in Carmel, California. Lindeman has apparently not completed college but is reported to make about $120,000 per year at Sandia. Narath was reported changing the locks on his Sandia office. But this did not prevent Sandia security from apparently apprehending Narath with five nude women in his office. Mr. Ray Armenta, Equal Employment Opportunities Commission employee, confirmed this above incident. Apparently Narath was apprehended on the final weekend of his employment at Sandia in an act of sexual penetration with another employee in his Sandia office. Narath moved on to his new job as a Vice President of Lockheed Martin in charge of DOE Energy and Environment projects, Lockheed Martin, TODAY, August 1996 reports. Conley's statement, "even to acknowledge the existence of such pertaining to an individual could be reasonably be expected to constitute and unwarranted invasion of personal privacy" is clearly in error. Narath's sex life at Sandia not only public but financed by taxpayer money. ... Ms Sessoms, IG official Conley is apparently unaware of the Vaughn Index or is attempting to deceive us. DOE MUST acknowledge existence of documents even if it wishes to withhold those documents for reason of FOIA exemption. Vaughn Index A distinguishing feature of FOIA litigation is that the defendant agency bears the burden of sustaining its action of withholding records. So, Ms. Sessoms, Conley is disobeying the law by failure to acknowledge existence of investigations reports of Narath. Purpose 4: Time limits for lawsuit. Ms Sessoms, O'Leary STATED in her celebrated whistleblower speech, I commit to promoting openness and I think one way I do this is being open myself. ... There is one final piece, ... measure results. Don't ever measure what anybody says, measure what is done ... And when we haven't done it well or completely or correctly we can come back and adjust, I expect you be to on me. We are. Morales and Payne have always felt the settlement of disputes is preferable to litigation. It's impossible to know how much the DOE spends combating whistleblowers at its 15 weapons plants across the country, but it's safe to say that Hanford's tab alone is upwards of several million dollars annually. One significant drain on the taxpayer's pocketbook is the DOE's practice of paying 100 percent of the legal expenses its contractors incur in fighting whistleblower lawsuits, regardless of the merits of the case. This encourages contractors to hire the most expensive lawyers and to continue litigation even when settlement would be cheaper." Michael O'Rourke, Cascadia Times, July 1995, page 10. We do not wish for DOE to further waste the taxpayers money. BUT if we do not have settlement or the lawfully requested documents, THEN we will file our expensive, disruptive, public, damaging lawsuit on December 20. If you have evidence that we have NOT exhausted all administrative remedies within the DOE, then we ask you to submit this to us by Friday December 1. Otherwise, we take no response as evidence that all administrative remedies have been exhausted. Sincerely, William H. Payne Arthur R. Morales 13015 Calle de Sandias NE 1024 LosArboles NW Albuquerque, NM 87111 Albuquerque, NM 87107

1 0

Who is who
by tnet1＠prodigy.net 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

This is a responsible email being sent by AC Enterprises. 1055 Stewart Ave., Bethpage , NY 11714. Tel. (516) 937-9001. Email tnet1(a)prodigy.net. The above statement complies with section 301 requirements relating to transmissions of unsolicited commercial electronic mail. To remove your name from our list immediately, please email: tnet1(a)prodigy.net with remove as the subject. We maintain our lists responsibly, and apologize for any inconvenience. Dear Candidate, You were recently nominated by The Office of Public Affairs for a free listing in The Kensington Who's Who Directory. http://www.gwh.net/~kensing/ Our Public Affairs Office gathers information from many recognized sources, including professional associations and societies, trade organizations, newspaper and magazine articles, professional reference publications, web presence, and referrals from existing members. As a highly respected professional in your field of expertise, we believe your contributions merit very serious consideration for inclusion in The Kensington Who's Who Directory. To maintain the level of accuracy, we ask you to click on the web address highlighted below and fill out the brief bit of information required for inclusion. There is no cost or obligation to be listed in The Kensington Who's Who Directory. All applicants will receive a free gift compliments of Kensington Who's Who. http://www.gwh.net/~kensing/ My Sincere Thanks, Lisa Narod Office Of Public Affairs

1 0

Internet Freedom Decision
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

John Gilmore calls attention to a recent US District Court decision which affirms controversial publication on the Internet: This is a big deal; it is strong support for the idea that publications should remain visible on the Internet UNTIL a judge has declared them illegal. Current practice of complainers is to try to get the material taken down immediately (typically by a service provider who's afraid to get sued), and then fight over whether to put it back! The case is in a defamation context, but might be applicable to the more common trademark/copyright/trade secret (e.g. scientology or domain name) censorship controversies. We should put the decision on the Web, and publicize the case. ----- See the decision and ACLU press release on it: http://jya.com/sheehan.htm

1 0

I am loooking for a reply to a MAIL BOMBER
by Han Solo 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hello! Some person that I know is sending me mail bombers, so I am looking for a virus mail or a powerfull mail bomber.. I tried with the Kaboom,qz, etc.... I couldn't use the avalanche cos I don't have the dlls, but I want use some powerfull mail bomber or a virus mail . Plase help me cos this person is send me 1000 mails per day..... Thank you _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

1 0

LOL. Made me look
by Seabiner＠aol.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

1 0