December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

17 Dec '03

>Mailing-List: contact pgp-users-help(a)joshua.rivertown.net; run by ezmlm >Reply-To: pgp-users(a)joshua.rivertown.net >Comments: Authenticated sender is <fredr(a)[204.141.41.5]> >From: "Fred B. Ringel" <fredr(a)[204.141.41.5]> >Organization: Rivertown.Net >To: pgp-users(a)joshua.rivertown.net >Date: Mon, 5 May 1997 12:52:57 -0500 >Subject: (Fwd) Extropia dead >Priority: normal > >Hi all- > > Thought I'd pass this *bad* news along. :-(( > > Fred >------------------------------------------ >Date: Mon, 5 May 1997 00:39:36 -0700 (PDT) >From: Miron <miron(a)best.com> > >Due to best.com (Best Internet) policies >remail(a)miron.vip.best.com has been shut down. >You will only received one notice.

1 0

Re: Firewalls
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Date: Sun, 4 May 1997 From: Graham-John Bullers <real(a)freenet.edmonton.ab.ca> Subject: Re: Firewalls Sender: owner-cypherpunks(a)cyberpass.net Reply-To: Graham-John Bullers <real(a)freenet.edmonton.ab.ca> On Sun, 4 May 1997, Anonymous wrote: Vulis does you wife no you write this? > Timmy Mayo the self-admitted child molester > possesses a rudimentary dick less than one > inch long, half the size of Graham-John Bullers' > clitoris, that barely makes a fistful. Thereby > hangs the root of this Jew-hating sissy's sick > fixation on little boys and Usenet forgeries. > > \|||/ > (o o) > -ooO-(_)-Ooo- Timmy Mayo > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Graham-John Bullers Modulator of alt.2600.modulated ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ email : real(a)freenet.edmonton.ab.ca : ab756(a)freenet.toronto.on.ca ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ http://www.freenet.edmonton.ab.ca/~real/index.html ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

2 1

Re: XS4ALL censored pages (fwd)
by root 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

As we guessed XS4ALL don`t even have the guts to send us a copy of the pages they censored. Check this out... >Dear Paul, >>Postmaster, >> >>Please send me a copy of your current pricing for web space. >> >>Also, please send me a copy of the marajuana pages you recently removed >>from your web server. > >Hearby you recieve information about all services from xs4all. > >We don't know anything about marajuana pages so we can't send you a copy of >that. > >Kind regards, > <Much pricing information and rattling of the stick in the swill bucket cut> >XS4ALL Internet B.V. Sales afdeling: >Postbus 1848 Email: sales(a)xs4all.nl >1000 BV Amsterdam Http://www.xs4all.nl/business > >Tel: 020-6222885 Fax: 020-5352002 >Ma. t/m vrij. van 12.00u tot 20.00u

1 0

Re: Rape, death and XS4ALL
by Alex de Joode 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Paul Bradley sez: : > Perhaps we should further expose XS4ALL's hypocricy by renting from the : > web space and putting up some pages they won't like. : I think this is an excellent idea, I`ll call or mail them in a few days : to find out their pricing structure. 30 Guilders a month (approx 17 USD a month) you get 5mb for your homepage. -- -aj-

1 0

Re: Rejecting Dialog with Government Vermin
by jimbell＠pacifier.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 22:43 5/01/97 -0700, Kent Crispin wrote: >On Wed, Apr 30, 1997 at 08:24:27PM -0800, Jim Bell wrote: >> I feel confident that a statistical analysis of various countries' >> governments would reveal a wide scatter in the relationship between >> population and government size. One of the main factors in this scatter is >> simply the amount that government has decided to butt into activities that >> could (and should) be privatized. Another is the amount that the >> government steals from one group in order to reliably receive the votes of >> some other group. > >> Population size would end up being a very poor determinant of government >> size. > >Yes, there would be scatter, but it is not important. The only reason "it is not important" is that this scatter is what demolishes your view of the world. > Population size >is *obviously* a strong determinant of government size. But probably not even close to the largest determinant. >So, having clearly established that larger countries will on balance >have larger governments, we can then just look at organizational >dynamics. *Any* large organization requires more infrastructure to >function. *Any* large organization will develop bureaucracy. This >is true for governments, this is true for businesses, this is true >for schools, this is true for militias. A big city police department >will have many different precints, with multiple layers of >management, a small town will have a chief of police and a few >deputies. But NONE of this is truly needed. I have a solution to that problem. Jim Bell jimbell(a)pacifier.com

4 4

Re: Bypassing the Digicash Patents
by Hal Finney 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

It is hard to understand why a system where it is impossible to track payments (Chaumian anonymity) is cheaper than one where it is possible to do so, but we choose not to. If avoiding tracking payments is cheaper than tracking them, why wouldn't participants just not bother to track them even when they theoretically could? Granted, there are situations where taking away someone's options can make him better off. The classic example would be the Prisoner's Dilemma, which I will assume people here are familiar with. Given the choice to cooperate or defect, standard analysis predicts that both players will defect. Remove that option, and they will be forced to cooperate, leading to a better ("lower cost") outcome for both. The structure of the game forced them to take advantage of an option which has the net result of costing them more. The question is whether this kind of reasoning would apply financial transactions. Is it really true that taking away the option of tracking transactions is going to save money overall? Sure, not keeping records is a priori going to be cheaper than keeping them, but the question is how much the loss of those records is going to hurt you. Presumably records are kept to protect against various risks. Without that protection, you need other means to control the risk. But if those means exist and they are cheaper than record-keeping, then again even without anonymity it should be cheaper to use those methods in place of the records. I think we would need to see a more detailed explanation of exactly why it is that people can't save money today by avoiding keeping records, when they could do so if it were impossible to keep records. (One possible explanation is that it would be a regulatory effect. People are forced by the government to keep records, to their detriment, that they would prefer not to keep. With anonymous bearer certificates it would not be possible to keep the records so people might hope to escape the regulations. However the problem with this reasoning is that the same forces which require the record-keeping would be likely to ban the use of instruments which prevent keeping records.) Hal

10 14

Read about this NEW income making opportunity!
by youtoocanmake＠lotsof.money 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Do you know how to use email? Then you should be making money hand over fist on the Internet! By the time you're finished reading this letter, you'll know EXACTLY how I'm doing it, and how YOU can too! Here we go... Introducing "The NEW Complete Internet Business Starter Kit!!!" If you can spare just 5 minutes of your time, I promise to deliver an opportunity unlike anything you've ever seen! You CAN start a very profitable business on the Internet WITHOUT spending a lot of money! How would you like to start a spare time business with YOUR OWN kit of cutting edge information products? What if everything in the kit came with unlimited and unrestricted ownership rights? You could sell this much sought after information for whatever price you wanted! And get this... You could even offer those rights along with your products! You'll be helping others start their own business! Would you be interested in an opportunity like this? How about if all the work has been taken out of it? As you know, there are many "business opportunities" floating around on the Internet. Some great, some not so great. But how can you tell the REAL opportunities from the money pits? YOU CAN'T! All you can do is choose a path and hope it's not a dead end. If you CAN find the right opportunity, you can make a bundle of money in a very short time. Here's why... The "Internet population explosion" is now under way. The actual numbers are a little hard to fathom, but here they are... In 1996 alone, over A MILLION people per MONTH have been signing up with an internet access provider! That's over 12 MILLION people per year! Even if this rate remains the same, and many expect it to increase, there will be more than 100 MILLION people online by the year 2000! So what does this mean to you? Simple. Like you, many of these 12 million newcomers per year will be looking for legitimate business opportunities. They'll also be looking for specialized information that will teach them how to start and operate their own high income, online business. The fact is, there are simply just not enough sources to meet these overwhelming demands! That's where you come in! You can meet BOTH of these demands with this NEW Complete Internet Business Starter Kit! Now, in a minute I'm going to tell you exactly what this information kit consists of. But before I do, I want to explain how it's a little different from ALL the others... Everything in this kit comes with UNLIMITED AND UNRESTRICTED REPRODUCTION RIGHTS! O.K. So you've seen reprint/reproduction rights being sold before. *** BUT NOT LIKE THIS!! *** "UNRESTRICTED" means just that! Not only can you sell this kit as YOUR VERY OWN, you can sell ALL rights along with it! That's what makes this kit sell with very little effort! Check around! You'll never find another company that lets you do this! (Actually, I've taken a little heat from some of my fellow information brokers over this decision. They insist I'll create my own competition. But when I explain the raw numbers of people jumping online every month, they seem to quiet down very quickly!) All right, here's what this exciting new information kit consists of... 1. "The Information Freeway!" It covers everything from rules and regulations, to how to use the newest online marketing strategies, including direct email! You'll learn everything you need to know about this brand new world of opportunity! 2. 300 new reports designed to help upstart entrepreneurs! These aren't the typical out of date reports that circulate till the end of time. Originally published in 1996, these reports contain real info you can use! Check these out... How To Protect Your PC From Email Viruses, How To Get Over 300 Prospects To Email You Weekly, Insiders Secrets On Advertising With The Major Online Services, What's Wrong with The World Wide Web, and Taxes For The Home Based Business Owner, and many, many more! 3. A free copy of the latest version of Pegasus, the most advanced e-mail software ever, and by far the easiest to use. With Pegasus you can send out 500, 1,000, even 50,000 sales letters every single day. 4. A working demo copy of Email Pro, the brand new $500 software used by all the major online marketers. With Email Pro you can extract thousands of targeted e-mail addresses per hour from the major online services. 5. 100,000 freshly extracted e-mail addresses of opportunity seekers and multi-level enthusiasts. All of these addresses are from the major online services and the Internet. America On Line, Prodigy, CompuServe, Microsoft Network, Genie and Delphi. These are people who enjoy reading about new opportunities and they are Buyers. 6. And get a load of this!! To make this a Complete Internet Business Starter Kit, you'll get your own customized version of this same sales letter. You can use any or the entire letter as your very own! All the "work" has been done for you! It just doesn't get any easier than this! O.K. Let's get down to the nitty gritty! I'm sure you're thinking, "O.K. Sounds good, but how much is this gonna set me back financially"? You've seen what everyone else is charging for information that's not nearly as comprehensive as this..$200? $100? $59.95? Well, Prepare To Be Shocked! The entire NEW Complete Internet Business Starter Kit is only $39.95... plus $5.50 Shipping & Handling Sound too good to be true? That's what others have said. That is, until they received their kit and saw for themselves just how easy it is to make money on the net! Here's a little more incentive to check this out... 2 FREE BONUSES FOR EVERYONE WHO ORDERS WITHIN 7 DAYS!!! 1. The List! Did you know there are over 1,000 FREE and ALMOST FREE advertising sites? I'll include a listing of the addresses. (There's a section in the manual that teaches you exactly how to post ads at these sites.) 2. An EXTRA 100,000 fresh e-mail addresses of opportunity seekers and multi-level enthusiasts. That will give you 200,000 eager buyers to mail this and any other offer you may have. This list has been known to pull as much as a 15% response rate. Can you imagine how much money you'll make with even a 2 or 3 per cent response? Well, that's about it. As you can see, this is truly a Complete Internet Business Starter Kit! Right down to your own deal closing sales letter! You're already paying to be online, why not make some money? Even if you sell ONLY ONE KIT, you've broken even! Everything after that is pure profit! Now that you know what you stand to gain, let's consider what you have to spend. Just $39.95! This is a small cost for the collection of reports and information that can have you in business, the day you receive your information package. Remember, not only will you be learning the most up to date information about making money online, you'll be teaching others how to succeed! (And making money in the process!) ######################## NEW ADDITIONAL OFFER ################## Question: Remember when you first considered going on line? You had dozens of questions and didn't know where to go for the answers. Many of us that had these questions started reading newspaper and magazine articles to familiarize ourselves with this new media! We also started reading "classified ads" to see what others are doing on-line! GUESS WHAT? MILLIONS ARE DOING THE SAME, TODAY! With the rapid expansion of the Internet, the information in the $39.95 Business Kit is a necessity, today. But many CUSTOMERS that I've spoken with have a desire to market this package in the 'Print Media', as I do (magazines & newspapers, etc.) The Business Kit gets you "Safely" up and running on the Internet, but what about those who are just coming on line. Or those just considering if it's PROFITABLE to go on line with their business?? This segment of the population is still reading Newspapers and Magazines to see what they can learn about the subject before 'jumping-in'. Being involved in Multi-Level-Marketing and Mail-order businesses have taught me a great deal through the years. I've made plenty of mistakes along the way. ***************YOU DON'T HAVE TO!!!!************** I've developed an additional package of information to compliment the Internet Business Starter Kit. I call this the 'PLUS' package. How can this help you? 1. Do you know the best newspapers to advertise in? (I'll supply a listing of hundreds of newspapers and their phone numbers!) 2. Do you know where to get an 800 number with voice mail for advertising at the very lowest possible price? (Including too many benefits to list) (I'm constantly updating information to provide the best possible programs and pricing!) %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% SPECIAL OFFER............................IF YOU ORDER WITHIN 7 DAYS !!! I'LL SEND THE 'STARTER KIT', PLUS THE ADDITIONAL PACKAGE FOR THE TOTAL PRICE OF $34.95 and I'll pay the shipping & handling myself. That will save you an additional $10.50! %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Thank you for your time. Just use a blank piece of paper to order, or you may print this document and use the order form below. To Order: SELECT ONE:..................... I am ordering within 7 days. Send me The NEW Complete Internet Business Starter Kit for the total price of $34.95______ I am ordering after the 7 day period. Send me The NEW Complete Internet Business Starter Kit for $39.95 + $5.50 S&H. $45.45_____ Send Checks or money order for AMOUNT SELECTED ABOVE. Note: ALL ORDERS ARE SHIPPED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, Please make checks or money orders payable to: VIPLabs P.O. Box 1164 Claremore, OK 74018 Your information: please fill in completely (Internal Code 1940.008) NAME______________________________________________________ ADDRESS___________________________________________________ CITY_______________________ STATE__________ ZIP____________ E-MAIL ADDRESS____________________________________________ TELEPHONE NUMBER: _______________________________required for personal checks I Authorize VIPLabs to charge an additional $30.00 fee if my check is returned for insufficient or uncollectable funds. SIGNATURE: x_______________________________ DATE: x___________________ If ordering from outside U.S. please add $10 to normal S&H charge. Credit Card Orders If you prefer, you can order by credit card. We accept Visa, MasterCard, Discover or American Express. Visa____MasterCard____Discover____American Express____ Name as it appears on card______________________ Address (City, State, Zip) as it appears on card__________ Account number__________________ Expiration Date_________ SIGNATURE: x________________________________ Date: x________________ THE MARKET IS HERE - TODAY! TAKE ADVANTAGE OF IT!!!!! After you receive your kit, I'll answer any questions time permits via email. I'm looking forward to helping you succeed in your new business! _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

1 0

Re: FC: Responses to Tim May's criticism of SAFE, and a rebuttal
by jimbell＠pacifier.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 12:10 5/02/97 -0700, Ernest Hua wrote: > The NSA/FBI is NOT standing still while we are all bickering about > precisely which dotted-i and crossed-t to support. They can, at > the stroke of Clinton's executive order pen, initiate effectively > THEIR law, while we must gather forces and summon Congress to jump > through enough hoops to pass effective legislation. > >In short, they can get what they want instantly, while we cannot >except through a long and arduous process (during which they can throw >many procedural and lobbying obstacles to slow us down). The process >is clearly in THEIR favor (and not without good reason), and we must >face that fact. Then let's force them to take that step, which (BTW) they haven't done already. They are well aware of the highly questionable constitutional nature of such a system, and I'm sure they're worrying that not only would such an executive order galvanize opposition to such a plan, it would also delay for a year or two the perceived "need" for the legislation they currently (and secretly) seek. By the time the executive order is overturned by the SC, it'll be too late to restore it as Congressional legislation. Jim Bell jimbell(a)pacifier.com

2 1

ISP fighting gov't on privacy issue
by Lynne L. Harrison 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- [From: CNET NEWS.COM] ISP battles for rebels' rights By Janet Kornblum [May 2, 1997, 12:45 p.m. PT] Todd Jagger, owner of what he calls the "world's smallest" Internet service provider, doesn't like the secessionist Republic of Texas rebels. But he has sued the state attorney general to protect their privacy. The state attorney general's office, seeking to gain information about the rebels, asked to see the records of ten Texas ISPs. Requested items included copies of email and logs of Web site visitors for several groups calling for Texas to split off from the United States. .... See: http://www.news.com/News/Item/0%2C4%2C10327%2C00.html?nd -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 4.5 iQCVAgUBM24yMT5A4+Z4Wnt9AQFVvgP/cUAjpVYWsoNGvqMsX4vaSnAzL3ZhtOFI 0TcBnIOqvOjIJQ+G7ecBPkA+z/4lSA2r5Ed01/Yiau4a9a/A4KcT8a6jWVN4uimB Ll2QSYgrAD9xx0SWLpfGfQsjUJrlsGYsuJ6SiL/rfCCpNKpaD7hXwU0JtwrFdJLp C6HQaHBrY3c= =iCkV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Re: Insults about Vulis
by TruthMonger 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Tim May wrote: > > At 10:22 PM -0800 5/4/97, Alan Olsen wrote: > >I really knew what specific actions caused people to have such a NASTY > >opinion of C2net. > > This is an easy one. The only continuing insults I see come from Vulis. No > further explanation is needed. > (One wonders why Vulis does not simply program one of his insultbots to > spew out a daily insult.) Tim should try to keep in mind that his vision is limited due to his generous use of self-censorship. Were it not so, then he might be aware of more than a few people who regard StrangleHold's empire with suspicion. I suppose that Mr. May regards Tom Weinstein, of Nut$crape, as just another Vulis tenacle. Or perhaps Mr. Weinstein is in Tim's killfile. Of course, Tim lets us all know that once he has spoken from upon high, that there is nothing more to be said in the matter. Perhaps Tim could ask Vulis, a programmer, to send him an insultbot to compose his Vulissaults. Or perhaps he could take the time to scan all the list posts and get a realistic view of list opinions and attitudes before he speaks out. Or perhaps he could stop to think about how much criticism of C2Nut's products is blunted by their censorship of other lists and their gang of legal-eagle thugs. [Please note that "Blame it all on Vulis," a favorite cypherpunk game, is not sold in stores.] > But the C2Net flap is behind us. The continuing claims that it was C2Net > which instructed Gilmore to remove Vulis are incorrect- Once again, Tim speaks of things of which he has, by his own admission, little knowledge, since he claims to have only lightly perused a precious few of the articles from this time period. Both John and Sandy stated that it was Sandy SameerFart who approached John with the offer of moderation/censorship. Robert Hettinga belatedly proposed that it was he who suggested the idea to Sandy (about the same time that Bob was coming into some cash and reputation capital promoting C2Nut's pet projects). While I anxiously await most of Mr. May's posts with eager anticipation, I think it might be wise of him to consult the archives regarding those things which transpired during his absence from the list, before speaking out so strongly on the issues involved (particularly if he is going to give the impression that once he has spoken, there is nothing more to be said). FactMonger -- Toto "The Xenix Chainsaw Massacre" http://bureau42.base.org/public/xenix/ "WebWorld & the Mythical Circle of Eunuchs" http://bureau42.base.org/public/webworld "The Final Frontier" http://www3.sk.sympatico.ca/carljohn/

2 1

Software patents
by Lucky Green 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 07:30 PM 4/29/97 -0400, Robert Hettinga wrote: >Anyway, getting back to the point, "avoiding unpleasantness" also means not >having patent lawyers sue those very essential "hoity-toity" trustee banks >for rediculous reasons, like patent infringement, actual or not. There is a simple way to prevent patent lawyers from suing you for supposed patent infringement. Distribute your software from a jurisdiction in which software patents do not exist. South Africa is one of many such jurisdictions. Anecdote: at a conference, I asked a patent attorney what strategy to follow if your patented technology is only happening in the client software. He looked at me like I was drooling on myself and said: "Uhm... Well... Then you have a problem." IANAL, but I suppose the best strategy for the owners of a shaky software patent would be to make people believe that their technology is patented in many more jurisdictions than it actually is. Have fun, -- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred "I do believe that where there is a choice only between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence." Mahatma Gandhi

2 1

Controversial Commercial ISP for Remailer? Controversial Commercial ISP for Remailer?
by nobody＠huge.cajones.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Suppose you wanted a commercial ISP to run a Winsock middleman remailer on. An ISP that was tolerant of the kinds of abuse and SPAM that remailers occasionally suffer from. An ISP who'd take your money and leave you alone. An ISP who wouldn't drop your account because of bad publicity. An ISP that could be a stable anchor for a remailer system, and maybe even for web-page remailers. Well, such an ISP exists, but there's a catch. It's Cyberpromo.com -- An ISP whose reputation capital was already so LOW that another gigabyte of flames to the postmaster wouldn't really be noticed. The good news is that service is pretty cheap - $50/2yrs POP+autoresponder, or $39 one-time for a mail forwarder. Don't know if he takes anonymous accounts, but probably does, since money orders are more reliable than most of his customers :-) Also don't know how he'd respond to subpoenas and warrants (probably quickly?) or wiretap requests (he's not a telco), or how long before he'll be assassinated or banned or IDPd. The bad news, of course, is that Spamford's negative reputation rubs off on the whole remailer system, and you risk a lot more spamming and anti-spammer attacks on your remailer (hence more administration work), and you risk raising Spamford's public image, and it does involve giving money to Spamford, which could be viewed as rewarding bad behaviour. You'd probably want to limit the remailer to one email destination per message to cut down on spamming. Spambert Greasy Fingerprint A0 D0 31 DF 62 85 19 0A A6 95 EA 85 A9 64 1B 7E -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 4.0 Personal Edition iQBFAgUBM25ByouqXu2FMJm1AQGhhQF/a0mCkwaVOolhkhX7t/kYSoVZ07bqxIC4 tYy9yumhnK97AwXqVjWoTSVffJYNbSwG =iLKF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- # Thanks; Bill # Bill Stewart, +1-415-442-2215 stewarts(a)ix.netcom.com # You can get PGP outside the US at ftp.ox.ac.uk/pub/crypto/pgp # (If this is a mailing list, please Cc: me on replies. Thanks.)

3 2

Re: Rejecting Dialog with Government Vermin
by jimbell＠pacifier.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 08:50 5/02/97 -0700, Kent Crispin wrote: >On Fri, May 02, 1997 at 12:34:19AM -0800, Jim Bell wrote: >The basic point, really, is that organizational complexity grows >with the size of the organization, at a greater than linear rate. >This is because organizational complexity is a function of >interactions between members of the organization, which is at least >n-squared. (However, when you consider that alliances form and can >interact, the true complexity grows at a much faster rate.) You seem to be taken with making all sorts of bare, unsupported claims, obviously with the intention of explaining (for example) away what was apparently an INTENTIONAL increase in the size of Federal government between (say) 1932 and today. To read your paragraph above, its increase in size was simply the unavoidable consequence of nature's laws or something akin to it. Maybe a product of number theory, or the Fibbonacci sequence, exponential increase, or something like that. Which would, if true, remove just about all the blame from those who were in control of the situation. BULLSHIT! Chances are good that at least 75% of the size of the US Federal government today is due to spending that wasn't considered the proper Constitutional function of the government before 1930, and certainly not before 1900 or so. (Large peacetime military, Socialist Insecurity, Welfare, Medicare, Medicaid, interest on national debt caused by deficit spending that occurred due to funding these previous atrocities, etc.) >> But NONE of this is truly needed. I have a solution to that problem. > >Jim, have you considered the interaction between religious beliefs and >AP? You apparently don't have direct knowledge of this, but after a >certain level of economic security has been reached economics becomes >a much less important as a motivator [Maslow]. Other people have blown this claim away, so I don't think I need bounce the rubble further. However, I wonder why you think that people will not resent the theft of their property simply because they've reached "a certain level of economic security."? Frankly, it sounds like yet another of your "let's justify the government through specious arguments" exercises. Jim Bell jimbell(a)pacifier.com

2 1

Re: Bypassing the Digicash Patents
by azur＠netcom.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>Bob Hettinga wrote: >I strongly beleive that you can easily knock three, maybe four, decimal >places off the cost of any transaction you can care to mention just by >using strong financial cryptography and anonymous digital bearer >certificates on a ubiquitous geodesic network. Although I stongly share your overall beliefs in the superiority of digital bearer certificates (DBC), I am much less certain about the intrinsic financial cost differentials. Let's first consider credit cards (CCs). Consumers using CCs, if they choose their bank/agent carefully and settle their monthly statements in full and promptly, pay nothing (directly) for the priviledge of using the cards. One can argue that merchants build the cost of their CC transaction clearance costs into their price structure and therefore every patron, whether using cash or CC, pay for the costs of CC usage (few merchants offer cash discounts). Most walk-in retail merchants, in good standing, pay about 2% in discount (fees). On-line and mail order merchants pay about 3% as do those with a higher rate of chargebacks and/or in grey businesses (e.g., on-line gaming and adult entertainment). These fees represent the costs of operating the CC clearing system (MC, VISA, AMEX, etc.) the bank's overhead and profit. Now let's look at Automatic Clearing House (ACH). ACH is a Federal Reserve service offered by 18,000 financial institutions to 40,000 corporations and generating 2.5 billion transaction per year. It is used by business to pay employees (automatic payroll deposit), automatic debt of consumer checking accounts (periodic payments) and business-to-business transactions (a primitive EDI). Costs of the service are born entirely by the business and rates vary considerably, depending upon volume and depth of business relationship with the bank or service company (e.g., ADP) and how much of the ACH pre-process work is automated or performed by the business. Charges are generally below $0.25 per transaction. The amount of back office processing required for ACH is not inherently different than for CCs. However, there is a significant difference in amount of marketing and distribution costs. It is not unusual for a bank to pay $50-60 to acquire a new CC customer. Compared to the massive CC consumer branding campaigns, there's not much marketing overhead in ACH. Whereas ACH is highly automated and all report generation is already included in the checking account fees (both business and consumer), CCs are often an additional and costly overhead. This is one reason the larger banks have been moving to integrate their consumer relationships into a single monthly statement (e.g., Citibank's "CitiOne"). When clients are convinced that electronic statements over the Net are acceptable this overhead will shrink considerably for both services, but will not be anywhere near zero. Will DBC systems will have lower marketing costs than CC or ACH serving similar customer bases and applications? I think not. Indeed, the case could be made that in order for DBC to gain widespread acceptance over ACH or CC marketing expeditures might need to be consideable. It is not clear that the back office costs of running a mint are any cheaper than a book-entry system (e.g., control and auditing requirements to meet Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and establish/maintain trust) and you still need the book-entry system to occassionally transfer value; to the extent that digital bearer certificates become accepted as legal tender costs should decline, but the regulatory issues increase. However, the ACH and CC system's prices reflect the substantial Fed and CC backbone cost and profit to run their private networks, and it is here that costs for on-line digital bearer certificate systems will have and edge for some time. When one combines the transactional economic advantages of DBC: no customer accounts, statement generation, little or no need for dispute resolution and the economies of using the Net for settlement, with the still considerable marketing costs, the likely differential between DBC and CC/ACH is closer to one order of magnitude at best. This is still considerable, however, and if properly branded and marketed could significantly displace current competition, for lower value transactions. The overhead of CC discounts is keenly watched by merchants. If a trusted DBC issuer/agent offered 1.0% fees (especially to on-line merchants) it would get noticed quickly. --Steve PGP mail preferred Fingerprint: FE 90 1A 95 9D EA 8D 61 81 2E CC A9 A4 4A FB A9 Key available on BAL server, http://www-swiss.ai.mit.edu/~bal/pks-toplev.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- Steve Schear | tel: (702) 658-2654 CEO | fax: (702) 658-2673 First ECache Corporation | 7075 West Gowan Road | Suite 2148 | Las Vegas, NV 89129 | Internet: azur(a)netcom.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- "I know not what instruments others may use, but as for me, give me Ecache or give me debt."

2 1

Re: Bypassing the Digicash Patents
by azur＠netcom.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>> When one combines the transactional economic advantages of DBC: no customer >> accounts, statement generation, little or no need for dispute resolution >> and the economies of using the Net for settlement, with the still >> considerable marketing costs, the likely differential between DBC and >> CC/ACH is closer to one order of magnitude at best. > >Again, I still hold out for three or four. > >> This is still >> considerable, however, and if properly branded and marketed could >> significantly displace current competition, for lower value transactions. >> The overhead of CC discounts is keenly watched by merchants. If a trusted >> DBC issuer/agent offered 1.0% fees (especially to on-line merchants) it >> would get noticed quickly. > >Agreed. However, when it happens, it'll probably be more significant than >that. I think removing 3 or 4 extra zeroes from the status quo is probably >what people should try to do when developing this stuff. I think that the >technology offers us at least that much slack, and probably more. > >Remember, it *is* supposed to change the world. :-). If I grant that you're right that DBCs will be 3-4 orders of magnitude cheaper than the book-entry approaches, and I'm ready yet, there is still the issue of whether such savings can be quickly passed on to the merchant and consumer, and thus spark this revoltion. Consider this, if a DBC-based system were to garner 3% (about what it might take to get noticed by the consumer, retail and business markets) of the GDP's $4 trillion in transactions, or about $120 billion, and the transaction fees were $0.0025, this would generate about $300 million in fees. This is about what Western Union International generates in fees, a very respectable sized business. But how much marketing and branding expenditures would it take to get there? All financial products which attempted to reach a broad market and have a significant impact have required, in the past, significant up-front marketing expenses (VISA succeeded because BankAmericard spent in the $10s million per year range). Unless the Net will enable a 3-4 orders of magnitude reduction in such expenses, amounting to an historic bootstrap, it is difficult to see how this will occur without a white knight. A similar situation is occuring in cellular. Prices are plummeting because many new companies are building out competitive PCS networks and forward pricing their services to gain market share and economies of scale. These new players have deep pockets (or are backed by those with deep pockets). To wrench away the bank and credit card francshise from the established players may require similar sized investments. --Steve PGP mail preferred Fingerprint: FE 90 1A 95 9D EA 8D 61 81 2E CC A9 A4 4A FB A9 Key available on BAL server, http://www-swiss.ai.mit.edu/~bal/pks-toplev.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- Steve Schear | tel: (702) 658-2654 CEO | fax: (702) 658-2673 First ECache Corporation | 7075 West Gowan Road | Suite 2148 | Las Vegas, NV 89129 | Internet: azur(a)netcom.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- "I know not what instruments others may use, but as for me, give me Ecache or give me debt."

2 1

Re: Bypassing the Digicash Patents
by Secret Squirrel 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On Sun, 4 May 1997, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote: > As usual, Greg the C2Net shill writes total bullshit about things he > knows nothing about. Try paying cash at Radio Shack, and see if they > ask for your name and address for their mailing list. I guess Greg > is not the type to buy anything at Radio Shack. What a fitting > employee for C2Net. Not a problem Dr. Vulis, whenever I purchase items from Radio Shack, I use your name and address and phone number. I hope you don't mind receiving extra catalogues. It is after all, all in the good name of privacy and protecting my uncoloured identity. VulvisMonger

1 0

Pro-Crypto Arguments
by Alan Olsen 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- The current line of argument in supporting crypto seems to fall into the "software as speech" (ala First Amendment) or Crypto as munition (and invoking the Second Amendment). I think of Crypto as "Freedom of Language". Imagine the uproar that would be caused if Jesse Helms (or one of his ilk) tried to pass a law that all conversations over the net or phone lines had to be in English. (Or at least in a language understood by the cops.) The amount of uproar would be incredible. The courts have already ruled against this form of "language escrow". Such rulings should apply to encrypted communications as well. Software is just the mechanism for the language of cryptography, it is not the language itself. Just as in spoken languages, special knowledge is needed to understand the "ideas" being communicated. The algorithm is (in part) that language. (But in this case, you are able to speak to only those you intend, not to the world at large.) Of course, the question is whether this line of reasoning will work under the current regime. Maybe, maybe not. It seems a better argument than the ones I have seen so far... Depends on how far the deck has been stacked against us. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 4.5 iQEVAwUBM266uOQCP3v30CeZAQHU4wf9GePLzvloFC/zpM+uAmdzq+wCzASUt/vH 0GP4v9DwLTYtWDp4O/o/ietk1tej4G/d1h2owpdHsGT1qkUXWIG8XUjWsTPblPsa 0uS097K+fB7fP7+LUyrGWkaCwNMfqQ3gErhVfoRsQ6lJRhWE+6JiIcdgxC1OY7lg kknM3//51Avbk+7CcVH+flyvL7uKWFHJdKpthiSSfKSg9nKJrLUQJxOQaK7xkpXH 4oFEKF1EApa2gFIPyTEM7Nd1Dp2PzcdNZrVHn2BmMP7eXeN4Jfkwoc31r95DPwpI L2uWEeRpNEs61qNtM8/gkKMXk5fP/vLl8ujDHaYXDOP6dA3CnSbGOA== =aN2p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --- | "Mi Tio es infermo, pero la carretera es verde!" | |"The moral PGP Diffie taught Zimmermann unites all| Disclaimer: | | mankind free in one-key-steganography-privacy!" | Ignore the man | |`finger -l alano(a)teleport.com` for PGP 2.6.2 key | behind the keyboard.| | http://www.ctrl-alt-del.com/~alan/ |alan(a)ctrl-alt-del.com|

1 0

FOIA results
by Greg Broiles 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Got two FOIA things in the mail today: 1. ~ 200 pp of "LIST OF DUAL USE GOODS AND TECHNOLOGIES AND MUNITIONS LIST" re my Wassenaar FOIA. It's much too long to type or scan. Am planning to type the crypto and software relevant parts when I get some free time. This looks like the document I was expecting. 2. A letter from the NSA in response to my FOIA request re cypherpunks - they want a check for close to $2400 before they'll do a search of their records. I'm not sending them $2400. Am considering appealing their denial of my fee waiver, and/or making a more carefully tailored request. I'll probably scan this within the next few days. -- Greg Broiles | US crypto export control policy in a nutshell: gbroiles(a)netbox.com | http://www.io.com/~gbroiles | Export jobs, not crypto.

1 0

Re: Controversial Commercial ISP for Remailer?
by Dave Hayes 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Mr. Arachelian writes: > Well, here's a thought. Let's pool some cash together and go off and > spam cyberpromo from the inside. Let's get an account there, turn it > around and spam everyone and their mother at cyberpromo and their > respective subdomains. Wouldn't that be sweet revenge? If vengance is your concern, this is a good idea. Neither vengance nor righteousness is my concern, however. Judgementally speaking, if you spam, you may not continue to condemn spammers and be consistent. ------ Dave Hayes - Altadena CA, USA - dave(a)jetcafe.org Freedom Knight of Usenet - http://www.jetcafe.org/~dave/usenet "If you are distressed by anything external, the pain is not due to the thing itself, but to your estimate of it; and this you have the power to revoke at any moment." - Marcus Aurelius, 121-180

4 6

Re: Pro-Crypto Arguments
by geeman 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Such was the thrust of my question posed to the Senate hearings via netcast: "Is secret speed protected speech" For if not, then it is a simple matter by extension to require that all communications be in the lingua franca of the listener, obviously preposterous. The respondent seemed to think that 'secret speech' is protected, but obviously there are counterarguments. At 09:59 PM 5/5/97 -0700, Alan Olsen wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >The current line of argument in supporting crypto seems to fall into the >"software as speech" (ala First Amendment) or Crypto as munition (and >invoking the Second Amendment). > >I think of Crypto as "Freedom of Language". > >Imagine the uproar that would be caused if Jesse Helms (or one of his ilk) >tried to pass a law that all conversations over the net or phone lines had to >be in English. (Or at least in a language understood by the cops.) The >amount of uproar would be incredible. The courts have already ruled against >this form of "language escrow". Such rulings should apply to encrypted >communications as well. > >Software is just the mechanism for the language of cryptography, it is not >the language itself. Just as in spoken languages, special knowledge is >needed to understand the "ideas" being communicated. The algorithm is (in >part) that language. (But in this case, you are able to speak to only those >you intend, not to the world at large.) > >Of course, the question is whether this line of reasoning will work under the >current regime. Maybe, maybe not. It seems a better argument than the ones >I have seen so far... Depends on how far the deck has been stacked against >us. > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: 4.5 > >iQEVAwUBM266uOQCP3v30CeZAQHU4wf9GePLzvloFC/zpM+uAmdzq+wCzASUt/vH >0GP4v9DwLTYtWDp4O/o/ietk1tej4G/d1h2owpdHsGT1qkUXWIG8XUjWsTPblPsa >0uS097K+fB7fP7+LUyrGWkaCwNMfqQ3gErhVfoRsQ6lJRhWE+6JiIcdgxC1OY7lg >kknM3//51Avbk+7CcVH+flyvL7uKWFHJdKpthiSSfKSg9nKJrLUQJxOQaK7xkpXH >4oFEKF1EApa2gFIPyTEM7Nd1Dp2PzcdNZrVHn2BmMP7eXeN4Jfkwoc31r95DPwpI >L2uWEeRpNEs61qNtM8/gkKMXk5fP/vLl8ujDHaYXDOP6dA3CnSbGOA== >=aN2p >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >--- >| "Mi Tio es infermo, pero la carretera es verde!" | >|"The moral PGP Diffie taught Zimmermann unites all| Disclaimer: | >| mankind free in one-key-steganography-privacy!" | Ignore the man | >|`finger -l alano(a)teleport.com` for PGP 2.6.2 key | behind the keyboard.| >| http://www.ctrl-alt-del.com/~alan/ |alan(a)ctrl-alt-del.com| > > >

1 0

Get 2 Million Email Addresses Today - ONLY $99 ALL DELIVERABLE
by 2m＠ALLVIP.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

* To Remove: Please hit reply & type "remove" in the subject < <> > Get 2 Million Email Addresses Today - ONLY $99 (Reg. $489) < <> > * Visa & Mastercard Welcome * Targeted to General Business & More All deliverable - Guaranteed - We replace your undeliverables! All addresses processed against a very extensive database of "remove" requests. Order Now and we will give you an EXCELLENT and AFFORDABLE ISP that welcomes unsolicited bulk email! This offer is for 2 days Only! Plus you will be immediately eligible for Exclusive Direct Wholesale Offers for all of your marketing needs! No waiting time! Immediately obtain this offer NOW & get started TODAY! For your << automatic >> Order Form: Email: 2mil(a)allvip.com * To Remove: Please hit reply & type "remove" in the subject

1 0

Site Builder Network: SBN Wire
by Site Builder Network 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

*** Microsoft (R) Site Builder Network *** In this issue: NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS * New - Microsoft Site Server * Microsoft Developer Network Library Goes Online * Free Intranet apps from the new Intranet Solutions Center * Get ready to develop for Internet Explorer 4.0 * New - Dynamic HTML Gallery MEMBERSHIP DOWNLOADS AND NEWS SPOTLIGHT * Introducing: Site of the Month * Feature Story - Internet Explorer 4.0 Technology * Chili!ASP from ChiliSoft * Metrowerks CodeWarrior for the Mac PLEASE NOTE: FORMATTING RESTRICTIONS MAY NOT ALLOW A URL TO FIT ON ONE LINE, THUS CAUSING AN ERROR IN THE LINK. IF A URL LINK DOES NOT SEEM TO WORK, PLEASE PASTE THE WHOLE ADDRESS (THAT MAY STRETCH INTO TWO LINES) INTO YOUR BROWSER FOR VIEWING. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE. NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS NEW - MICROSOFT SITE SERVER Microsoft Site Server, the newest member of Microsoft's BackOffice family, makes it easy to enhance, deploy, and manage sophisticated web sites built on Windows NT Server and Internet Information Server. For all the latest information, go to the new Site Server web site at http://www.microsoft.com/siteserver/. MICROSOFT DEVELOPER NETWORK LIBRARY GOES ONLINE Site Builder Network's sister resource, the Microsoft Developer Network, has launched a new web site. Go to http://www.microsoft.com/siteserver/ for the most up-to- date programming information. Take advantage of an MSDN Online Membership and receive access to the MSDN Library Online, a registration to the MSDNFlash (email notification service), and a host of other online specials. FREE INTRANET APPS FROM THE NEW INTRANET SOLUTIONS CENTER We've launched a one-stop web site for finding fast easy answers to intranet issues at http://www.microsoft.com/intranet/default.htm. The site includes 47 free, sample intranet applications you can download, including workflow charts, bug tracking, employee handbooks and more. Plus, articles, case studies, and a load of resources can be found at the site. GET READY TO DEVELOP FOR INTERNET EXPLORER 4.0 To ready you for Internet Explorer 4.0, we've built a whole new Workshop page just for Internet Explorer 4.0 Technologies. You can find it at http://www.microsoft.com/sitebuilder/workshop/prog/ie4/. You'll find the latest information on Microsoft Internet Client Software Development Kit, being shipped with the IE4 Platform Preview CD. DYNAMIC HTML GALLERY We've expanded our Gallery to include a section on Dynamic HTML. Go to http://www.microsoft.com/gallery/default.asp and scroll down to the Dynamic HTML globe. Here you will find the latest Internet Explorer 4.0 technology, ready to view. Learn about and start using Dynamic HTML now! MEMBERSHIP DOWNLOADS AND NEWS SPOTLIGHT INTRODUCING - SITE OF THE MONTH Introducing the Site Builder Network Site of the Month. Don't envy them; learn from their stories. The SBN Site of the Month features in-depth analysis of the technical, design, and business stories behind a Web site that rocks (and maybe even money). Check out our first honoree at http://www.microsoft.com/sitebuilder/webadvantage/baarns .asp. FEATURE STORY - INTERNET EXPLORER 4.0 We're spotlighting Internet Explorer 4.0 this week. Check out the feature story this week in the Site Builder Network Magazine at http://www.microsoft.com/sitebuilder/features/inetsdk. asp. Topics include: a what-why-how overview of a very Web-savvy browser, how the new multimedia controls will add sparkle to your pages, and the Dynamic HTML Object Model explained. NEW DOWNLOADS Chili!ASP, from ChiliSoft, lets you build Active Server Pages (ASP) on non-Microsoft Web servers. Metrowerks CodeWarrior is the development environment of choice for Macintosh computers. This special demonstration version of CodeWarrior lets you experience the fast compilers, easy-to-use IDE (Integrated Development Environment), and context-sensitive editor. ________________________________________ To increase or decrease the frequency of e-mail or postal mail you receive from Site Builder Network, please go to http://www.microsoft.com/sbnmember/apply/apply.asp and click "Change Your Membership." You will find check boxes, which will allow you to choose the frequency of mail you wish to receive (including none). To cancel your SBN membership, please put "Cancel my Membership" in the subject heading and e-mail back to SBN(a)microsoft.com.

1 0

CALEA Comments
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

The FBI has published today in the Federal Register industry comments and its responses to Section 104(d) of the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, 2nd Notice of January 14, 1997, and requests additional comments: http://jya.com/fbi050697.htm (33K)

1 0

Jim Bell in the Oregonian
by Alan 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Jim Bell has an editorial (with his picture) in the Oregonian. (Morning edition, May 6th, 1997 page B-9.) It takes up about a quarter of the page. It is an interesting read. It does not address the problems with AP, but it does deal with the raid and other issues involved. Jim might consider posting a copy of the original article here. Given the Oregano's love of cut-and-paste journalism, it would be interesting how the original and print versions differ.

2 1

Hacking the Crypto Ban
by Alan 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

An article in "Intelectual Property" magazine on hacking around the crypto export ban at http://www.ipmag.com/crypto.html . Get it while it is still there. Goes into great length about the EAR and those Hamletionians pouring poison into it. (Sorry... Started channeling John Young there for a moment...)

1 0