December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

No Subject
by Anonymous 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 10:11 PM 12/22/97 -0800, you wrote: >What is the best long gun for a Cypherpunk? > > You didn't say if you were interested in a trophy or just filling the freezer nor if you would be in open country or in the bush. A good all around choice would be one of the medium power thirty caliber cartridges. It would be prudent to use ammunition lo! aded with well constructed bullets because some Cypherpunks are thick skinned, particularly those with law degrees. LongPigMuncher

2 1

Re: SPECIAL REPORT: Censorware in the Stacks Re: SPECIAL REPORT: Censorware in the Stacks
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Colin Rafferty writes: > > Tim May writes: > > When the state-as-sovereign sets up libraries that don't carry Everything > > (hint: and not even the LOC carries everything), then the choices it makes > > can be seen by some to be First Amendment violations. > > This is not a First Amendment violation. > > The government is not required to promote all speech, but only to not > restrict it. Selection of books for a library does not abdridge freedom > of speech, since the act of not selecting does not reduce speech. > > Modifying the content of the selected books would be an infriging act, > since that is a reduction. > > They cannot subscribe to Playboy and then put pasties on the nipples. > Nor can they subscribe to the Internet and then filter it. And the difference between `selecting' which books to acquire for the library and `selecting' which web pages to receive is what? Those pages `not selected' by the Internet filter are not `reduced' any more than the `not selected' books. There is no consistent application of principle in your arguments. > > A better solution is to get Government out of the business of running > > libraries or providing Net access. > > I fail to see how this will solve anything. Then rub a couple of neurons together and see if you can generate a spark. If the government isn't in the business of either `selecting' books or internet pages, then there is no `selecting' to be done in either case and therefore nothing to be solved. -Frondeur

1 0

Parks and Guns
by Tim May 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I've seen a couple of comments about my point about state-run parks not allowing guns in, which would seem to be an interesting case of the state limiting Second Amendment rights on territory it controlled. (I won't push this much further, as the state may also limit firearms in courthouses, in Federal buildings, and so on. Jusitifiably, I might add. But this does make the point that the state-as-employer or state-as-property-manager may do things that seem to directly limit constitutional rights.) Anyway, several comments have focussed on _little_ parks, those little patches of grass and winos and spent syringes in the nation's cities. What I was talking about were the biggies, like the Forest of Nisene Marks, right next to my house, starting on the ridge on the other side of the valley from me. Tens of thousands of acres....hundreds of miles of hiking and biking trails. Get caught with a gun in that park and face jail time. Of course, hikers and bicyclists sometimes get mugged, raped, and murdered in this park, so carrying a gun in one's fanny pack makes a lot of sense. "Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6," as the famous saying goes. Interestingly for newcomers to the list, it was putting out this piece of common sense opinion that got me a threatening phone call from the Santa Cruz County Sheriff's Office in the summer of 1995. Seems that someone read my opinions and contacted the authorities...a Sheriff's Deputy called to warn me that my opinion verged on the illegal (oh yeah?) and that he might send a "vehicle" out to my place to have a chat with me and check out my state of mind. When I said something along the lines of, "Fine, but call in advance, so I'll know it's your boy," he flipped out, started furiously typing on a keyboard (I could hear it), and said something like "That comment has been entered in your file as a threat against a law enforcement officer." At that point I told him that there was then no point in talking to him further, if my truthful comments were to be declared "threats." (I guess, as some have argued here recently, I was supposed to have said something like, "Thank you, officer, for pointing out the error of my opinion that hikers and bicyclists ought to take steps to defend themselves. I understand now that weapons are not to be owned or carried by citizen-units, and that a woman facing rapists on a mountain trail should simply dial 9-1-1 at the nearest payphone and wait for the police to arrive. I am sorry I expressed an opinion in these Beknighted States.") --Tim May The Feds have shown their hand: they want a ban on domestic cryptography ---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---- Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, ComSec 3DES: 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets, Higher Power: 2^2,976,221 | black markets, collapse of governments. "National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."

1 0

Re: Freedom Forum report on the State of the First Amendment
by David Honig 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 12:55 PM 12/23/97 -0500, Colin Rafferty wrote: >William H Geiger writes: >> In <ocryb1c2i2u.fsf(a)ml.com>, on 12/23/97 at 10:30 AM, Colin Rafferty <craffert(a)ml.com> said: >>> Paul Bradley writes: > >>>> Should the government be able to take action against me because I fire >>>> someone for being jewish/black/homosexual??? > >>> Welcome to the 20th Century, moron. > >> Really amazing how many so-called "freedom fighters" become STATIST if the >> proper buttons are pushed. > >What are you talking about? > >Freedom of expression is not the same as freedom of oppression. You aren't being oppressed the other party doesn't want to interact with you, unless that party is government providing base services to all (e.g. police/courts/border protection). You *are* being oppressed if mutually consensual behavior is interfered with by others including the State. You *are* being oppressed if you are coerced into a relationship you don't want. An employer-employee relationship is like a marriage or any other arrangement between adults -mutually consensual. Colin, do you consider yourself oppressed when someone choses not to date you? What about a rejection by someone who takes out a public advertisement in the paper? Freedom is only tested when it hurts. ------------------------------------------------------------ David Honig Orbit Technology honig(a)otc.net Intaanetto Jigyoubu "Windows 95 is a technologically complex product that is best left alone by the government..." ---MSFT Atty B. Smith

1 0

Re: Freedom Forum report on the State of the First Amendment
by Colin Rafferty 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

David Honig writes: > At 12:55 PM 12/23/97 -0500, Colin Rafferty wrote: >> William H Geiger writes: >>> In <ocryb1c2i2u.fsf(a)ml.com>, on 12/23/97 at 10:30 AM, Colin Rafferty <craffert(a)ml.com> said: >>>> Paul Bradley writes: >> >>>>> Should the government be able to take action against me because I fire >>>>> someone for being jewish/black/homosexual??? >> >>>> Welcome to the 20th Century, moron. >> >>> Really amazing how many so-called "freedom fighters" become STATIST if the >>> proper buttons are pushed. >> >> What are you talking about? >> >> Freedom of expression is not the same as freedom of oppression. > You aren't being oppressed the other party doesn't want to interact > with you, unless that party is government providing base services to all > (e.g. police/courts/border protection). Actually, you can be. > You *are* being oppressed if mutually consensual behavior is interfered > with by > others including the State. > You *are* being oppressed if you are coerced into a relationship you don't > want. You are not being coerced into anything. If you don't want to serve food to Blacks, don't open a restaurant. It's your choice. By the way, you are also not allowed to dump toxic waste in your own backyard. Are you being oppressed? > An employer-employee relationship is like a marriage or any other arrangement > between adults -mutually consensual. In a fantasy world, it is mutually consensual. It the real world, it is seldom mutual. > Colin, do you consider > yourself oppressed when someone choses not to date you? What about > a rejection by someone who takes out a public advertisement in the paper? Nope. Of course, this has nothing to do with anything. > Freedom is only tested when it hurts. With freedom comes responsibility. Decency is one of them. -- Colin

3 2

Re: Freedom Forum report on the State of the First Amendment
by Colin Rafferty 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Lizard writes: > At 12:55 PM 12/23/97 -0500, Colin Rafferty wrote: >> Freedom of expression is not the same as freedom of oppression. > How is someone 'oppressed' by my choosing not to deal with him for some > reasons, but not for other reasons? Either way, he does not get my services. > I refuse to hire you because you are black -- you are oppressed. > I refuse to hire you because you're an Aquarius and my astrologer told me > not to hire Aquarians -- you are not oppressed. > I refuse to hire you because you're a Republican and I'm a Democrat, and I > don't think we'll work well together -- you are not oppressed. > But in all cases, you are not hired. > Explain the logic of this to me. The logic is about patterns of discrimination of society and the State acting as a social engineer to remove the patterns. It is about basic human decency, and giving a person a fighting chance. If society, in general, discriminated against people with freckles, it is likely that it would be made illegal. > (Yes, it is perfectly legal to not hire someone based on star sign, > political affiliation, or having freckles.) > No human being has a right to compel service from another human being. No majority group has a right to discriminate against a minority. You prove that you know The Truth, and I'll prove that I know The Truth. > If I > do not wish to engage in trade with you, that's my right. Would you be less > oppressed if I just closed up shop and refused to trade with ANYONE? Oppression is done by a society. It can only be stopped by acting against the individuals in the society that are doing the oppressing. > The issue here is not expression, but association. That's a good point. However, the alternate doesn't have the same rhythm: Freedom of association is not the same as freedom of oppression. -- Colin

6 6

[Off topic]Discrimination
by Lizard 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 02:25 PM 12/23/97 -0500, Colin Rafferty wrote: > >The logic is about patterns of discrimination of society and the State >acting as a social engineer to remove the patterns. In other words, rights belong to the collective, not to the individual. If I deny Joe Smith a job for an 'approved' reason (which still has nothing to do with his competence), then, too bad for Joe. But if I deny it for an 'unapproved' reason, equally unrelated to his competance, then I am denying the job to ALL people who share that trait, everywhere. That's a collectivist viewpoint. Either a person -- a single, unique, individual -- has a right to compel someone else to serve him, or he does not. The reasons for denying service are irrelevant TO THAT INDIVIDUAL. >It is about basic human decency, and giving a person a fighting chance. All of which is fine, but why should it be compelled? Didn't you once say that liberalism made the assumption that we were basically moral and should be free to act, rather than the conservative view that we were basically immoral and should be restrained? >If society, in general, discriminated against people with freckles, it >is likely that it would be made illegal. So what good does this do the person dicriminated against, if there is NOT a 'pattern' of it? He's still out of a job. This is the key point:It is the INDIVIDUAL that matters. >> (Yes, it is perfectly legal to not hire someone based on star sign, >> political affiliation, or having freckles.) > >> No human being has a right to compel service from another human being. > >No majority group has a right to discriminate against a minority. There are no groups. There are only individuals. A job, or an offer of goods or services, occurs between individuals -- not groups. If I am denied employment, YOUR bank account does not shrink. If you are granted a high paying job, I do not get rich. My hunger is not yours;yours is not mine. Further, every individual has a right to choose who they will and will not associate with, based on whatever criteria they wish. I don't date mundanes (non-fen). While the inability to have me as a boyfriend is no great loss, I am nonetheless 'discriminating' against a large %age of the female population (and 100% of the male population, FWIW). (Granted, a far larger %age of the female population discriminates against me, as they refuse to date overweight, unattractive, socially inept nerds. Whom do I sue?) > >Freedom of association is not the same as freedom of oppression. > Most people would claim not associating with me is liberating, not oppressing. How is person 'a' oppressed because person 'b' decides, for whatever reason, not to like them?

1 0

[fs] Contemporary Cryptology Book
by travish+cp-01＠dejanews.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I found this at a local half-price bookstore. I purchased a copy for myself and was wondering if any of you wanted one. I do not intend to make any money off of this, I am simply doing it as a favor for fellow crypto-enthusiasts. I believe it would make an excellent companion to "Applied Cryptography". The tone is what you would expect from IEEE Press; more theoretical than A.C., not shying away from the discrete mathematics but without losing sight of the subject, either. There is some mention of the uses of cryptography applications like tamperproofing nuclear monitoring equipment, and other relatively cool stuff. It is apparently a brand new, undamaged book, sold for half price, or about $45. I'll sell it for what I will pay, plus s/h (your choice of carriers), plus COD charge if not prepaid. It is on hold for me until Saturday, so email me soon if you're interested. Here is the original blurb: http://www.ieee.org/ieeestore/compbk.html#pc2717 > An all-in-one guide to the science of information integrity... > > Contemporary Cryptology: The Science of Information Integrity > > edited by Gustavus J. Simmons, Sandia National Labs Albuquerque, NM > > This original source book covers all aspects of the subject with > emphasis on the cryptographic elements. In addition to being an > introductory guide to the latest developments, this volume provides > the engineer and scientist with algorithms, protocols, and applications. > > Copyright 1992/Hardcover/656pp > List Price: $89.95 > Member Price: $77.00 > IEEE Order No. PC2717-QAJ > ISBN 0-87942-277-7 -- Travis Hassloch / travish(a)dejanews.com / http://www.dejanews.com Deja News System Defenestration Group / "When news breaks... we fix it" PGP key C7FDD3D5 fgpt 7A 48 DD 46 E6 7F 11 E7 8F 7E 53 9A DF 33 9E FA

1 0

Re: Freedom Forum report on the State of the First Amendment
by David Honig 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 02:37 PM 12/23/97 -0500, Colin Rafferty wrote: > >You are not being coerced into anything. If you don't want to serve >food to Blacks, don't open a restaurant. It's your choice. Where do you get the right to tell others how they can make a living? >By the way, you are also not allowed to dump toxic waste in your own >backyard. Are you being oppressed? I am not allowed to place toxic waste, or noise, where it can affect others; I can ingest toxins privately and listen to whatever music I like so long as you don't detect it in your backyard. >> An employer-employee relationship is like a marriage or any other arrangement >> between adults -mutually consensual. > >In a fantasy world, it is mutually consensual. It the real world, it is >seldom mutual. You prefer a shotgun or otherwise arranged marriage? >>> Colin, do you consider >> yourself oppressed when someone choses not to date you? What about >> a rejection by someone who takes out a public advertisement in the paper? > >Nope. Of course, this has nothing to do with anything. Private behavior is private behavior, and trade is a private behavior. >> Freedom is only tested when it hurts. > >With freedom comes responsibility. Decency is one of them. > >-- >Colin But obligate decency at gunpoint is not worth it. ------------------------------------------------------------ David Honig Orbit Technology honig(a)otc.net Intaanetto Jigyoubu "Windows 95 is a technologically complex product that is best left alone by the government..." ---MSFT Atty B. Smith

2 1

Re: Freedom Forum report on the State of the First Amendment
by Colin Rafferty 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

David Honig writes: > At 02:37 PM 12/23/97 -0500, Colin Rafferty wrote: >> You are not being coerced into anything. If you don't want to serve >> food to Blacks, don't open a restaurant. It's your choice. > Where do you get the right to tell others how they can make a living? I don't have that right. However, the Supreme Court has said that the Congress has that right. >> By the way, you are also not allowed to dump toxic waste in your own >> backyard. Are you being oppressed? > I am not allowed to place toxic waste, or noise, where it can affect > others; I can > ingest toxins privately and listen to whatever music I like so long as you > don't detect it in your backyard. Well, racism is hiring decisions is something that is detected in other people's backyards. That's why its illegal. >>> An employer-employee relationship is like a marriage or any other >>> arrangement between adults -mutually consensual. >> >> In a fantasy world, it is mutually consensual. It the real world, it is >> seldom mutual. > You prefer a shotgun or otherwise arranged marriage? I prefer a level playing field. >>> Colin, do you consider >>> yourself oppressed when someone choses not to date you? What about >>> a rejection by someone who takes out a public advertisement in the paper? >> >> Nope. Of course, this has nothing to do with anything. > Private behavior is private behavior, and trade is a private behavior. Not in this country. If you don't believe me, check out Article I, Section 8 for one explicit example. >>> Freedom is only tested when it hurts. >> >> With freedom comes responsibility. Decency is one of them. > But obligate decency at gunpoint is not worth it. It's called civilization. You should try it some time. -- Colin

4 3

Re: Lock and Load (fwd)
by Bruce Balden 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>It shows that a Communist rifle doesn't allow us the freedom to lock and load. > Having travelled in China extensively, I can tell you that there is not a great deal of "Communism", the way Marx, Lenin, Stalin, or even Mao might have imagined it. Historians of WWI will recall that US domestic politics included a faction that maintained that the two oceans were a natural protection against overseas aggressors and so involvement in the European war seemed pointless. Such people were called "isolationists", even though they were simply maintaining that the US simply **was** isolated. Anyway, China has had the Himalayas and huge deserts and the Pacific to protect it and was the same way. When technology changed that, all sorts of foreigners moved in. By the time the twentieth century arrived, Chinese were sick of foreign influence, and successive governments, Imperial (Qing dynasty), Guomentang (National People's Party = KMT), CPC (Communist Party of China), tried to kick everybody out. Mao's communism was, among other things, better organized, and at least kicked the Japanese, and later the Russians, out, making them great heros to the Chinese people for this alone. But now, after the Great Leap Forward, and other adventures, Chinese people including those within the Communist Party, have little more patience for socialism. State Owned Enterprises (SOEs), the core of communism, are being systematically privatized, with a final result expected to resemble modern Britain c. 1975 (before Thatcher), and they are engaging in extensive joint ventures with foreign firms. China can't drop the word "Communist" easily for political reasons, but "socialism with capitalist characteristics" is not readily distinguishable from Tony Blair's species of moderate European socialism. Similarly, the U.S. cannot admit directly that most of the Cold War military spending was essentially a form of disguised Keynsian economics, and that Grumman and friends were essentially state-subsidized if not state-owned ent erprises. Eisenhower figured out but few others did.

1 0

ron paul for prez
by Vladimir Z. Nuri 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

------- Forwarded Message Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 10:42:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Patricia Neill <pnpj(a)db1.cc.rochester.edu> Subject: IP: An Important Recent Letter from Congressman Ron Paul To: ignition-point(a)majordomo.pobox.com An Important Recent Letter from Congressman Ron Paul (Texas): Please forward freely! - ---------------------- Congressman Ron Paul House of Representatives 203 Cannon Washington D.C. 20515 TEL 202-225-2831 FAX 202-226-4871 Dear Friend: The other day, I made a huge "gaffe" on national TV: I told the truth about the crimes of the U.S. government. As you can imagine, the ceiling fell in, and a couple of walls too. Congressmen are supposed to support the government, I was told. Oh, it's okay to criticize around the edges, but there are certain subjects a member of the House of Representatives is not supposed to bring up. But I touched the real "third-rail" of American politics, and the sparks sure flew. I was interviewed on C-SPAN's morning "Washington Journal," and I used the opportunity, as I do all such media appearances, to point out how many of our liberties have been stolen by the federal government. We must take them back. The Constitution, after all, has a VERY limited role for Washington, D.C. If we stuck to the Constitution as written, we would have: no federal meddling in our schools; no Federal Reserve; no U.S. membership in the UN; no gun control; and no foreign aid. We would have no welfare for big corporations, or the "poor"; no American troops in 100 foreign countries; no Nafta, Gatt, or "fast-track"; no arrogant federal judges usurping states rights; no attacks on private property; and no income tax. We could get rid of most of the cabinet departments, most of the agencies, and most of the budget. The government would be small, frugal, and limited. That system is called liberty. It's what the Founding Fathers gave us. Under liberty, we built the greatest, freest, most prosperous, most decent country on earth. It's no coincidence that the monstrous growth of the federal government has been accompanied by a sickening decline in living standards and moral standards. The feds want us to be hamsters on a treadmill -- working hard, all day long, to pay high taxes, but otherwise entirely docile and controlled. The huge, expensive, and out-of-control leviathan that we call the federal government wants to run every single aspect of our lives. [Page 2] Well, I'm sorry, but that's not America. It's not what the Founders gave us. It's not the country you believe in. It's not the country I believe in. So, on that TV interview, I emphasized not only the attacks on our property, but also the decline of our civil liberties, at the hands of the federal police. There are not supposed to be ANY federal police, according to the Constitution. Then I really went over the line. I talked about the Waco massacre. Bill Clinton and Janet Reno claim those 81 church members, including 19 children, burned down their own church and killed themselves, and good riddance. So they put the few survivors on trial, and threw them in prison for 40 years. We're not supposed to remember that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms -- talk about an unconstitutional agency -- rather than arrest David Koresh on his regular morning jog, called in the TV stations for a big publicity bonanza, and sent a swat team in black masks and black uniforms to break down his front door, guns blazing. They also sent in a helicopter gunship, to shoot at the roof of a church full of innocents. The Branch Davidians resisted, and after a heartless siege of almost two months, and after cutting off food, water, and electricity, and playing horrible rock and roll through huge speakers 24 hours a day, the feds sent in the tanks to crush the walls of the church, and inject poisonous CS gas. Now, CS gas is banned under the Paris Convention on Chemical Warfare. The U.S. could not use it in a war. But it could and did use it against American civilians. After the tanks did their work on the church, the place burst into flame, and all 81 people -- men, women, children, and babies--were incinerated in a screaming horror. Did some feds set the fire? Did the flammable CS gas ignite, since without electricity, the parishioners were using lanterns? Did a tank knock over a lantern, striking one of the bales of hay being used against the thin walls as a "defense" against bullets? or did the Davidians, as Clinton and Reno claim, kill themselves? A new documentary -- Waco: The Rules of Engagement -- may show, through FLIR infrared photography, FBI snipers killing the Davidians by shooting through the back of the church, where no media cameras were allowed. This film won a prize at the famed Sundance Film Festival. It was made by people who took the government's side, until they investigated. Whatever the truth, there's no question that an irresponsible federal government has innocent blood on its [Page 3] hands, and not only from Waco. And the refusal of corrupt and perverse liberals to admit it means nothing. In my TV interview, in answer to a caller's question, I pointed out that Waco, and the federal murders at Ruby Ridge -- especially the FBI sniper's shot that blasted apart the head of a young mother holding her baby -- caused many Americans to live in fear of federal power. Then I uttered the sentiment that caused the media hysteria: I said that a lot of Americans fear that they too might be attacked by federal swat teams for exercising their constitutional rights, or merely for wanting to be left alone. Whoa! You've never seen anything like it. For days, in an all-out assault, I was attacked by Democrats, unions, big business, establishment Republicans, and -- of course -- the media, in Washington and my home state of Texas. Newspapers foamed at the mouth, calling me a "right-wing extremist." (Say, isn't that what George III called Thomas Jefferson?) I was even blamed for the Oklahoma City bombing! And by the way, I don't believe we've gotten the full truth on that either. All my many opponents were outraged that a Congressman would criticize big government. "If you don't like Washington, resign!" said a typical big-city newspaper editorial. But the media, as usual, were all wet. (Do they ever get ANYTHING right?) The average Congressman may go to Washington to wallow in power, and line his pockets with a big lobbying job for a special interest (so he can keep ripping-off the taxpayers). But that's not why I'm in Congress. It's not why I left my medical practice as a physician. It's not why I put up with all the abuse. It's not why I refuse a plush Congressional pension. I'm in this fight for a reason. I want to hand on to my children and grandchildren, and to you and your family, a great and free America, an America true to her Constitution, an America worthy of her history. I will not let the crooks and clowns and criminals have their way. I'm in Congress to represent the ideas of liberty, the ideas that you and I share, for the people of my district, for the people of Texas, for the people of America. That's why I'm working to stop federal abuses, and to cut the government: its taxes, its bureaucrats, its paramilitary police, its spending, its meddling overseas, and every single unconstitutional action it takes. And not with a pair of nail scissors, but with a hammer and chisel. Won't you help me do this work? Not much of the federal leviathan would be left, if I [Page 4] had my way. But you'd be able to keep the money you earn, your privacy would be secure, your dollar would be sound, your local school would be tops, and your kids wouldn't be sent off to some useless or vicious foreign war to fight for the UN. But Jefferson and the other Founders would recognize our government, and our descendants would bless us. By the way, when I say cut taxes, I don't mean fiddle with the code. I mean abolish the income tax and the IRS, and replace them with NOTHING. Recently, I asked a famous Republican committee chairman -- who's always talking about getting rid of the IRS -- why he engineered a secret $580 million raise for the tax collectors. "They need it for their computers," this guy told me. So the IRS can't extract enough from us as it is! The National Taxpayers Union says I have the highest pro-taxpayer rating in Congressional history, that I am the top "Taxpayer's Best Friend." You know I won't play the Capitol Hill games with the Capitol Hill gang, denouncing the IRS while giving the gestapo more of your money. or figuring out some other federal tax for them to squeeze out of you. I also want to abolish the Federal Reserve, and send Alan Greenspan out to get a job. The value of our dollar and the level of our interest rates are not supposed to be manipulated by a few members of the power elite meeting secretly in a marble palace. The Federal Reserve is unconstitutional, pure and simple. The only Constitutional money is gold and silver, and notes redeemable in them. Not Fed funny money. Without the Federal Reserve, our money could not be inflated, at the behest of big government or big banks. Your income and savings would not lose their value. Just as important, we wouldn't have this endless string of booms and busts, recessions and depressions, with each bust getting worse. They aren't natural to the free market; they're caused by the schemers at the Fed. President Andrew Jackson called the 19th-century Fed "The Monster" because it was a vehicle for inflation and all sorts of special-interest corruption. Let me tell you, things haven't changed a bit. I also work to save our schools from D.C. interference. Thanks to the feds, new curriculums not only smear the Founders as "racist, slave-owning elitists," they seek to dumb down our students so they will all be equal. "Look-say" reading and the abolition of phonics has the same purpose, and so does the new "fuzzy" math, in which there are no right and no wrong answers. That must be what they use in the U.S. Treasury! It's certainly what they use in the U.S. Congress. [Page 5] But ever since the beginning of federal aid to education and accelerating with the establishment of the rotten Department of Education, SAT scores have been dropping. Schools, with few exceptions, are getting worse every year. To save our kids, we must get the sticky fingers of the feds off our local schools, and let parents rule. That's what the Constitution says, and the Bible too. And then there's my least favorite foreign topic, the UN. World government is obviously unconstitutional. It undermines our country's sovereignty in the worst way possible. That's why I want us out of the UN, and the UN itself taking a hike. After all, the UN is socialist and corrupt (many votes can be bought with a "blonde and a case of scotch," one UN ambassador once said). It costs many billions, and it puts our soldiers in UN uniforms under foreign commanders, and sends them off to unconstitutional, undeclared wars. When Michael New, one of the finest young men I've ever met, objected to wearing UN blue, he was kicked out of the American Army. What an outrage. Not one dime for the UN, and not one American soldier! Not in Haiti, not in Bosnia, not in Somalia, not in Rwanda. I know it's radical, but how about devoting American military efforts to defending America, and only America? Such ideas, said one newspaper reporter, make me a "maverick who will never go far because he won't 'go along to get along.'" Darn right. What does "go far" mean? Get a big government job? The heck with that. And I won't sell my vote for pork either. When I walked through the U.S. Capitol this morning, I got angry. The building is filled with statues and paintings of Jefferson, Madison, and the other Founders. Those great men sacrificed everything to give us a free country, and a Constitution to keep it that way. When I was first elected, I placed my hand on the Bible and swore an oath to uphold the Constitution. That's exactly what I'm fighting for. But such ideas drive the liberals crazy. That's why I badly need your help. I've been targeted nationally for defeat. The Democrats, the AFL-CIO, the teachers union, big business PACs, the trial lawyers, the big bankers, the foreign-aid .lobbyists, the big media, and the establishment Republicans want to dance on my political grave. The Fed, the Education Department, and the UN are anxious to join in. They can't stand even one person telling the truth. And they're terrified when that truth gains the people's support. Right now, four well-funded Democrats are competing to try to beat me, and a Republican is rumored to have been [Page 6] offered money at a secret meeting in Mexico(!) if he would try to knock me off in a primary. Won't you help me stay up here to fight? Frankly, I'm in trouble if you don't. My Texas district has 22,000 square miles (not a misprint). I've got to travel all over it, set up small offices to be manned by volunteers, advertise, pay phone bills, and distribute video and audio tapes to the people to get around the big-media lies. As I know from my last election, which I won by the skin of my teeth, the media will carry any smear, repeat any libel, throw any piece of mud, no matter how untrue. In fact, the less true, the more they like it. They are determined to silence me. But you can help me overcome all this. Together, we can beat the bad guys arrayed against our country and our freedom. We can support the Constitution. We CAN win. Your generous contribution of $25 or $50 would be great. $100, $250, or even $500 or $1,000 would be magnificent. Of course, any amount would help, and in return, I will keep you up-to-date on this fight as a member of my "kitchen cabinet." What great men founded this country. What great people have carried on their fight. That fight is not lost, not if you will join it. Washington, D.C., is a loser, but among the people, our ideas are gaining EVERY SINGLE DAY. Keep the tide turning in our direction. Please make your most generous contribution. Join this fight for the Constitution, and stop those who want to rip it up, and throw it in the Potomac. Together, we can join the Founders, fight. Together, we can make history. Sincerely, /s/ - Ron Ron Paul U.S. Congressman P.S. Without you, I may be lost, and they'll be breaking out the champagne in D.C. PLEASE, DON'T LET THIS FIGHT FOR THE CONSTITUTION AND LIBERTY FALTER. HELP ME WIN IT. ********************************************** To subscribe or unsubscribe, email: majordomo(a)majordomo.pobox.com with the message: subscribe ignition-point email@address or unsubscribe ignition-point email@address ********************************************** http://www.telepath.com/believer ********************************************** ------- End of Forwarded Message

1 0

Cryptix 3.0 - the International JCE
by Robert Hettinga 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--- begin forwarded text Date: 23 Dec 1997 22:41:22 -0000 From: iang(a)systemics.com To: e$(a)vmeng.com Subject: Cryptix 3.0 - the International JCE Sender: <e$(a)vmeng.com> Precedence: Bulk Happy Xmas from the Cryptix Development Team! Here's the full story: ======================================= For immediate release: Cryptix 3.0 - the International JCE 23 December 1997 -- A major new release of Cryptix is now available on web sites around the world. Cryptix V3.0 includes the International Java Cryptography Extension (IJCE). The cleanroom implementation of the JavaSoft specification was built by David Hopwood and Raif Naffah, and also includes new algorithms by the team, including the long-awaited unencumbered ElGamal public key algorithm. Cryptix includes the strong cryptography that is needed to protect privacy and electronic commerce on the Internet. With this release, the Cryptix Development Team is maintaining its committment to quality, freeware cryptography. In full, the Cryptix International JCE release supports: Symmetric encryption Blowfish, CAST5, DES, Triple DES, IDEA, LOKI'91, RC2, RC4, SAFER, SPEED, Square Message digests HAVAL, MD2, MD4, MD5, RIPEMD-128, RIPEMD-160, SHA-0, SHA-1 Public-key encryption RawElGamal GF(p), RSA Public-key signatures RawElGamal GF(p), RSA Padding PKCS#5, PKCS#7, OneAndZeroes, NONE Modes ECB, CBC, CFB, CFB-PGP, OFB Miscellaneous Base64 encoding Cryptix now offers the widest choice in Java cryptographic solutions. These benefits can be downloaded from the international mirror index listed below. A design goal of maintaining compatibility with Java 1.0.2 has been substantially achieved, although specific Java 1.1 features and some of the new algorithms (ElGamal and KeyGenerators) are not available when using the older standard. This provides a smoother upgrade path to full J1.1 and JCE functionality. The international download mirror index is located at http://www.systemics.com/software/cryptix-java/ The Cryptix Development Team acknowledges the kind assistance of the many mirror sites that permit widespread and free distribution of the product, to maximum benefit of the Internet community. David Hopwood <hopwood(a)zetnet.co.uk>, Raif S. Naffah <raif(a)fl.net.au> and Ian Grigg <iang(a)systemics.com> are available to answer questions on this release of Cryptix. - - - - - - - - - Cryptix is a trademark of Systemics Ltd. Java is a trademark of Sun Microsystems, Inc. Sun Microsystems does not endorse this release, and are not involved in any way with the product. -- iang systemics.com FP: 1189 4417 F202 5DBD 5DF3 4FCD 3685 FDDE on pgp.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Where people, networks and money come together: Consult Hyperion http://www.hyperion.co.uk/ info(a)hyperion.co.uk ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Full-Strength Cryptographic Solutions for Worldwide Electronic Commerce http://www.c2.net/ stronghold(a)c2.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Like e$? Help pay for it! For e$/e$pam sponsorship or donations, <mailto:rah@shipwright.com> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- --- end forwarded text ----------------- Robert Hettinga (rah(a)shipwright.com) Philodox e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire' The e$ Home Page: http://www.shipwright.com/ Ask me about FC98 in Anguilla!: <http://www.fc98.ai/>

1 0

Re: Best Cypherpunk long gun
by Blanc 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Gladiator Z. Nuri wrote: >no wonder TCM is so frustrated all the time. forget chips, >forget software, he's really a stymied wannabe gun salesman. > >I've almost never complained about off topic posts, but >this is really beyond the limit of all comprehension. ............................................................ You would have had to've been up late last night/early this morning, to understand. Jim & Brian & Landon were sitting around comparing notes on AKs & things, and someone trolled the list, and TCM volunteered a bit, and so it went. I was lurking, bemused. Such details to go over; every little thing is measured & labeled, typed and dated. "I can take it apart in 11 seconds and put it back together in 21". Hmmm. .. Blanc

1 0

No Subject
by Anonymous 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 02:52 AM 12/23/97 -0600, you wrote: >Forwarded message: > >> Subject: Re: Lock and Load (fwd) >> Date: Tue, 23 Dec 97 02:41:03 -0500 >> From: "Brian B. Riley" <brianbr(a)together.net> > >> It was the first cicilian marketed semi-auto in the country No, that one was a Baretta. The Browning was the first successfully marketed simi-auto shoulder weapon in *this* country. I believe the Remington M-8 was based on the same Browning recoiling barrel design. > >This doesn't use a Mauser 1898 action does it? The top feed 5-round clip is >my first clue... The 95 and 98 Mauser (along with the Springfield) are *bolt action* arms. They are magazine fed. > >As to first semi-automatic in the country, I believe the Springfield 1903 >has that particular honor. It used a Mauser '98 action also. It's also where >.30-06 got the 06 from...also very popular in WW1 and used as a sniper rifle >through Normandy, after which the Garand pretty much took over. You've got yur facts mangled a tad. The 03 is a hand operated bolt action! It was predated in US military service by both the Krag and Lee bolt actions. The first US service semi-auto rifle, discounting the abortive Pederson device, was the Johnson .30-06! . The .30-06 is called the .30-06 Springfield because the original , .30-03, round was loaded with a FMJ 220 gr. slug at around 2000 fps . It proved to be little better than the trapdoor .45-70 which it replaced in the hands of most infantry troops. In190! 6 a new service cartridge with slightly different case dimensions was introduced sending a FMJ 150 gr. bullet out at around 2500 fps. Later it was up rated to 2700 fps as the brittle case hardened 03 Springfield actions were phased out in favor of strong! er "hi-number" 03-A3 rifles. I carried an 03-A3 (serial number 4796575) for four years. Good dependable weapon and if I could see em, I could generally hit em with it. >Yep, bet this is some sort of Mauser '98 action... Nope, don't bet yur gas money , sonny. > >> Merry Christmas to you too ... we here in Vermont are having a *very* >> white Christmas already with more snow coming tonite and tomorrow ... > >We're supposed to get rain and more rain starting tomorrow. They say it might >be clear on Christmas but the rain returns on Friday...;( > >Stay warm & thanks for the discussion. > > | -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate | Screw the holiday cheer shit, I wish you a good meal, a warm bed, and unlimited firepower. DemanglerMunger

1 0

It's the usual Libertarians-vs-Statists flame war! Re: Freedom Forum report on the State of the First Amendment
by bill.stewart＠pobox.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

We're pretty far off topic for both fight-censorship and cypherpunks, aren't we? There's a bit more excuse on fight-censorship, since censoring racists vs. freely publishing hate speech is a core issue there; the cypherpunks content is mostly limited to "In cypherspace, nobody can hear you flame" and technologies for protecting freedom of speech and association from censors, racists, and other statists. Colin Rafferty writes: >>> If you want to live in a hut in Montana and shelter yourself from the >>> real world, feel free. Otherwise, it may be a good idea to check out >>> social theories from the last hundred years. There've been a number of them. Socialism. Fascism. Libertarianism. Randroidism. Existentialism. Non-existentialism. Nudism. Pick several :-) Some of those social theories say it's a good idea to hire guys in blue suits to beat up people who are acting in ways you consider rude, while others think you have the duty to beat them up yourself, or to protest non-violently, or to keep silent if it's not your business, or to insult them behind their backs, or to organize boycotts. In uncivilized countries, the blue-suiters carry guns to encourage rude people to allow themselves to be beaten up; more civilized liberal countries issue them clubs instead so the beating gets done up close and personal. Personally, I think that freedom of association is a critical part of a civilized society, and that people who hire thugs to beat up racists are just as rude as the racists they're having beaten up; hiring quieter thugs who'll let the rude people chicken out and just hand over their money and close their stores instead of being beaten is also rude, but you can make a lot more profit that way and keep your liberal conscience satisfied that you're stopping rudeness. (I hope it should be obvious, but I apply the same rhetoric to people whose idea of rudeness is using rude words or smoking rude plants or associating with the wrong color of people or engaging in voluntary rude activities with the wrong people. However, unlike liberals, it's hard to make that kind of people feel _guilty_ about being rude, only embarassed, and they tend to respond by making more rude laws as an excuse to beat you up...) William H Geiger (not to let his statist ranting off the hook either) is alleged to have written: >> Please explain to me where in the Constitution the government is >> given the power to determine who I *must* associate with?? and Colin replies >Given that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was upheld as Constitutional, I >would generally use that as an argument. The much-abused Commerce Clause is probably more useful for this argument. Original intent or not, it's been quite effective. The Constitution was, after all, a political compromise between people ranging from near-anarchists to moderate statists, slaveowners, currency-fiaters, hard-money advocates, and non-government-money advocates, free traders and drug smugglers, trade-taxers and trade-monopolizers, religious, anti-religious, and a while raft of other positions. It was far from morally perfect even on the issues where the writers were far-thinking enough to imagine how their words might get twisted. Keeping the states from regulating interstate commerce was a good idea, not that the Commerce Clause appears to have done that very well, but allowing the Feds to regulate it was, in my opinion, a serious mistake even if the Feds had limited their control to real interstate commerce. The previous confederation that the Constitution usurped wasn't perfect, and allowed a more distributed statism rather than the centripetal statism that replaced it. Sure, if the Constitution _doesn't_ allows the Feds to do something, they definitely shouldn't, but even if it _does_, that doesn't mean it's even vaguely ok - it just means that the bunch of politicians in Philadelphia agreed on it and went home and talked their fellow politicians into buying the package. Spooner argued that not only did they not have the right to do so, but that even if they had it wouldn't have been binding in his day, much less ours. And by the way, none of this has to do with whether governments can require corporations not to have their employees act rudely. Corporations are a fictional creature whose existence is a favor from the government to the owners, and they can tie whatever strings they want to onto the favor when they grant it. Whether granting favors to bunches of owners is a State or Federal job, or whether it's Nobody's job, the owners can do what they're told or have their favor vanish in a puff of greasy orange smoke and still not have a cause of action for complaining about it. Companies run by partnerships and the business activities of individuals are a separate issue, unless they're selling to the government, which also makes them fair game. Thanks! Bill Bill Stewart, bill.stewart(a)pobox.com PGP Fingerprint D454 E202 CBC8 40BF 3C85 B884 0ABE 4639

3 2

Re: Best Cypherpunk long gun
by Brian B. Riley 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On 12/23/97 11:57 AM, Igor Chudov @ home (ichudov(a)algebra.com) passed this wisdom: >Brian B. Riley wrote: >> I had maybe a half dozen occasions where I put four to six 20 >> round mags (the Marines didn't start getting the 30 round mags >> til the Army got all theirs - sigh!) through my weapon on full >> auto in rapid succession and never had a jam. > >Did it overheat? Hot enough to burn exposed skin, but not enough for problems. I think had I gotten up to seven or eight magazines one after another there may have been danger of cooking off rounds or even barrel warp. I saw a an M-2 50 on a Chinook get a barrel warp after 1000 straight rounds ... first the barrel was glowing cherry red in broad daylight then as it cooled it warped enough that the gunner took it out of action ... fortunately by that time we had gotten off the ground and were well airborne on our way back to Danang (hmmmmmm, makes me think, nuthin good ever did happen out near Thuong Duc and Charlie Ridge!) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 Charset: noconv iQEVAwUBNKB1Mz7r4fUXwraZAQGCCAf/Yb0kffVGoPxht45wNowpD66qawU6TKZT g951Mv2OXwJMjDz3L7Dc1U5pqU2x2Zjr5kBKmA7qjJeHJFKB6BxP8XDUuauN6zMb 4Y0C3tVS+dPKSAJH5tgiP6Cx9Ml+qD14Pwn9zOrVPTSsHiDnF/haJrFXl5zaW9Ou ivLHuBDK5cFR1vcQJVJvN2AAlYGnBWwxNJNAo6ytlxDC3niMQw4gR06MeQ8vQTDL D3uxYDOa/2t5j9lskgwnXitbBnTgVHfOuD39+zdgPOhuCiPICxDxbNZrHfweVFDw ADBieG/FAj5Tu8tiukeTTnsWtIcnBiHBW7VFWu8IxNKyaoPHZW66yA== =6Gm8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Brian B. Riley --> http://members.macconnect.com/~brianbr For PGP Keys <mailto:brianbr@together.net?subject=Get%20PGP%20Key> "The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn." -Alvin Toffler

2 1

Re: Best Cypherpunk long gun
by Brian B. Riley 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On 12/23/97 12:28 PM, Tim May (tcmay(a)got.net) passed this wisdom: >Also, extreme long-range sniping is increasingly done with .50 >BMGs, or .338 Lapua, or, at the lower end, .300 Winchester Magnums. >In all cases, shot recovery is limited more by the shooter >reacquiring the sight picture than by cycling the action, so a >semi-auto is mostly a waste of resources. In the 60's and early 70's at least, the most accurate 'sniper' weapon in the military arsenal was the M-2 .50 cal machine gun (Ma Deuce) with tripod and T/E mechanism and set for single shot fire. There was a telecopic sight set for it and everything. On a 1st Recon OP at a place called Hill 200 down river from Thuong Duc in Quang Nam Province, Charlie liked to run dugouts and other small boats across the Vu Gia at night and real early morning ... we used to potshot at them with Ma Deuce from 2-3 klicks away and make good hits. We field tested some of the first larger starlight scopes and the gave us one rigged to mount on Ma Deuce, after three nights in a row causing spectular secondaries Charlie gave up and moved much farther down river. At the time they never could figure out how we saw them with almost no moon. (interesting sidelight on this matter was that USMC T/O for Recon had no 50 cals ... so we could not order ammo for it through normal supply channels ... the only ammo we could get was by trading with the air wing which meant all we could get was API (armor piercing incendiary) sopposedly is highly verbotten to shoot at ground troops ... seems it excessively ruins their afternoons!) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 Charset: noconv iQEVAwUBNKCAzD7r4fUXwraZAQGntgf/XwwHK5sEOwJJfOniOBxIPpDpslo0oPP8 2oIN9AJiaQGzclrdVATUntruLeZX4hHtCyOgrBBINaUGcu2/3EaIqvf0P2ofb2Bj Gr1zC+JoXftLT+/Cs46KkM2lV6INwte5vjUve5SXkS57Zw3km9U5gDFNFPV/NWTR nwihq2lU8W9BdIfHYS0suL9MAxddHKLoCSQeHZx9v0zWPchN3UotqM1Vn99KVKw2 dewgsbHYQ9izAiul0A/BIkZEpGELQSfg2z8cztvpYKuD3XKUThX7YFxHRZ2gN1LI +HaHG57t8sF4qfIrzb7/mx1ZwqVU1NJ8kIZ3U7xLEfGLsKSwB94MvA== =qPxj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Brian B. Riley --> http://members.macconnect.com/~brianbr For PGP Keys <mailto:brianbr@together.net?subject=Get%20PGP%20Key> "The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn." -Alvin Toffler

1 0

Re: Best Cypherpunk long gun
by Brian B. Riley 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On 12/23/97 11:07 PM, Igor Chudov @ home (ichudov(a)algebra.com) passed this wisdom: >the problem is the wear of the barrel > >ignoramus > no questio about wear, but I saw the barrel after it colled and it had a warp to it. I said 1000 rounds straight and I meant it. They kept linking onto the belts and I will bet he didn't let up on the trigger a dozen times through the ten belts .... my LRRP team had stumbled into a bit of hornets nest and half the NVA in that end of the province were chasing our asses by the time we hitthat LZ. the guy just kept firing til the barrel glowed and it did warp slightly when it cooled, enough that he didn't want to chance another round down the barrel. my guess is that it had been abused more than a few times and the overall temper of the metal had chnaged , but for sure there was probably very littel rifling left in the barrel as well. I have seen M-60 barrels so worn that they appeared to the naked eye as smoothbores. Brian B. Riley --> http://members.macconnect.com/~brianbr For my PGP Keys <mailto:brianbr@together.net?subject=Get%20PGP%20Key> "...error reading WinOS. (A)bort, (R)etry, (M)acintosh?"

1 0

Ancient Banking History
by Robert Hettinga 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--- begin forwarded text X-Authentication-Warning: fma66.fma.com: majordomo set sender to owner-espam(a)lists.espace.net using -f X-Orig-From: Frank Sudia <aurelius(a)panix.com> X-e$pam-source: bounce-dcsb(a)ai.mit.edu X-Sender: rah(a)pop.sneaker.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 08:45:55 -0500 To: espam(a)intertrader.com From: Robert Hettinga <rah(a)shipwright.com> Subject: Ancient Banking History Sender: owner-espam(a)lists.espace.net Precedence: bulk Reply-To: e$(a)thumper.vmeng.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- This mail is brought to you by the e$pam mailing list --------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Frank Sudia <aurelius(a)panix.com> To: Digital Commerce Society of Boston <dcsb(a)ai.mit.edu> cc: Kawika Daguio <kdaguio(a)aba.com>, Richard Field <field(a)pipeline.com>, Stewart Baker <sbaker(a)ns.steptoe.com>, Frank Sudia <frank.sudia(a)bankerstrust.com>, Bernard Frischer <frischer49(a)aol.com> Subject: Ancient Banking History MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: bounce-dcsb(a)ai.mit.edu Precedence: bulk Reply-To: Frank Sudia <aurelius(a)panix.com> Dear Friends, One key problem facing many who seek to reinvent tha banking system is that they are only dimly acquainted with banking. Indeed many of us who work for banks also suffer this problem, because banking has become so encrusted with concepts from different eras that it's difficult to tell what is fundamental. So whilst we are attempting reinvent ourselves it might behoove us to get back to basics, which is what you get from "Athenian Society & Economy: A Banking Perspective," by Edward E. Cohen, Princeton, 1992. (Amazon) Drawing on empricial evidence, Cohen presents an intensive study of Athenian banking practices during the 80 year period between the defeat of Athens in the Peloponnesian Wars and the death of Alexander the Great in 323 BC. First he debunks the myth that there were no commercial loans, and then goes on to adduce complex banking transactions carried on with only a bag of silver coins and a table ("trapeza" in Greek, "banc(h)a" in Italian and most other languages). According to Demosthenes, a trapeza is "a business operation producing a risk-laden return from other people's money." Seeing these transactions arising in their simplest forms is very instructive, because it shows you what really matters about them. The trapeza took deposits and made loans, some of the proceeds of which were redeposited (and reloaned), thus expanding the money supply without fiat currency. There was zero government regulation! There were no checks, as payors and payees all showed up in person. There were bills of exchange to minimize transport of coins. There were 6,000 drachmas in a talent, and (I think) 20 drachmas in a Cyzicene stater, another popular big coin. Much of the business was undisclosed, to help clients reduce taxes, escape judgements, etc. Notions of interest were different: 1% a month for landed loans, 18-100% (per voyage) for maritime loans. Etc... I'm only part way thought it, but thought I would share this info, for all you history buffs out there. Cheers, Frank -------------------------------------------------------------- Frank W. Sudia, Consultant, BT Strategic Ventures 1 Bankers Trust Plaza, MS 2371, New York, NY 10006 Tel: 212-250-5242 Fax: 212-250-9347 Home: 212-809-5150 frank.sudia(a)bankerstrust.com -------------------------------------------------------------- For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to "dcsb-request(a)ai.mit.edu" with one line of text: "help". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Where people, networks and money come together: Consult Hyperion http://www.hyperion.co.uk/ info(a)hyperion.co.uk ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Full-Strength Cryptographic Solutions for Worldwide Electronic Commerce http://www.c2.net/ stronghold(a)c2.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Like e$? Help pay for it! For e$/e$pam contributions or sponsorship: <mailto:rah@shipwright.com> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- --- end forwarded text ----------------- Robert Hettinga (rah(a)shipwright.com) Philodox e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire' The e$ Home Page: http://www.shipwright.com/ Ask me about FC98 in Anguilla!: <http://www.fc98.ai/>

1 0

CIA Tradecraft Notes
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

We've transcribed the CIA's release of "A Compendium of Analytic Tradecraft Notes," a 10-part series on how to perform intelligence analysis. http://jya.com/cia-notes.htm (124K)

1 0

Javascript Encryption/Decryption
by amp＠pobox.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

The Javascript page at infohiway has posted a javascript implementation of simple encryption for the web. http://www.infohiway.com/javascript/indexf.htm This would be interesting if it had a real crypto algorithm in it like IDEA. ===from their page=== Welcome to the ISN Web Developer's Cut-N-Paste JavaScript, Perl and Plug-ins Toolbox! http://www.infohiway.com/javascript Featuring more than 189 FREE JavaScripts you can simply paste into your HTML! Plus we have some Cut-N-Paste Perl and CSS scattered around the site, too! Cut-N-Paste JavaScript Home / Encryption Scheme This little script is really easy to use. Just paste in your message and you get back your encrypted message... relatively quickly. So long as the recipient has the same JavaScript app as you do, decryption will work. The sample on this page is of a 4-Bit encryption open architecture scheme using only JavaScript. Although designed primarily for encryption of shorty emails, the same notion could be used to protect confidential dealer price lists, etc. on your public pages. Encryption is not just a matter of "jumbling letters". Any amateur cryptographer has a whole lot more tricks than that up his sleeve. First, our little sample programs permit you to use a key letter, a key word or a key phrase of your own devising. What length? You decide. Since the length is unknown, we've created a first problem for anyone attempting to decrypt it. Secondly, they are ultimately recursive. Meaning that you can recursively encrypt encrypted materials as many times as you wish. Only you and the recipient know how many times. Another problem for the "great decryptor". Finally, you can really be sneaky about the key phrases you use. For example, you might agree that the key phrase will be the seventh line on page 13 of Catcher in the Rye. (Seventh month, thirteenth day) Or you might grab the 13th line on a page at a specific URL for this month. Or the lead headline from the ABC News Home Page for today. If you download this little script to your hard drive, even if the boss finds it, it does him/her absolutely no good whatsoever in decrypting your email, because the key phrases are absolutely necessary to the decryption of encrypted messages. === E-mail: amp(a)pobox.com Date: 12/24/97 Time: 08:50:10 Visit me at http://www.pobox.com/~amp -export-a-crypto-system-sig -RSA-3-lines-PERL #!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj $/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1 lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/) Have you seen http://www.public-action.com/SkyWriter/WacoMuseum ===

1 0

No Subject
by Mix 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Tim May has been beaten up numerous times by fellow prostitutes for driving blow job prices down. _ {~} ( V-) Tim May '|Y|' _|||_

2 1

FREE CASH GRANTS, FUNDING AND LOANS
by order_desk78＠hotmail.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Our research reveals that this information may be of use to you and/or your organization. ********************************************************************************* Hi, if you have ever considered getting a loan ...............you should take time to read this. We Have Over 45,000 U.S. Based Grant Provider Programs In Our Database. WE ARE A FINANCIAL FINDER & MATCHING SERVICE ."INTEREST - FREE CASH GRANTS AND FUNDING!"... IF YOU ARE BEING REJECTED FOR THE MONEY YOU NEED ..... ______________________________________________________ Then Why Not Try A Private Foundation OR The Federal Government? Interest Free Cash Grants From $100.00 & Up to $1,000,000.00. No Collateral. No Cosigners, No Security Deposit, No Credit Check. No Pay Back. The Money May Be Used For Any Worthwhile Purpose; Education, Personal Welfare, Business, Medical, Religion, Etc. ANYONE CAN GET AN INTEREST FREE CASH GRANT! ____________________________________________ As long as they have a genuine reason for needing money and as long as the grant provider's guidelines are met. Dear Applicant, This letter tells you HOW YOU CAN GET AN INTEREST FREE CASH GRANT. Take a few minutes to read it. You'll be suprised to see how easy it can be to get a grant. From time to time, everyone needs to borrow. The problem is that for most people, getting a loan is a big hassle. Going to banks or finance companies in person takes a lot of time. In most cases, there is endless paperwork. And Unfortunately, in many cases all that you end up with is a rejection notice. ABSOLUTELY NO HASSLES ________________________ Getting a Grant is probably a lot easier than you think. In your area, there are usually only a small number of places that will provide you with the money, that you need. On the other hand, there are literally thousands of grant providers who donate money to people who have genuine reasons for needing the money. Chances are that most banks in your area have very stringent loan requirements. Unlike Banks, most Grant Providers are more lenient; in a sense that persons who have poor credit, no credit, or even those who have gone through bankruptcy are able to get the money that they need - sent to them by a check payable to them. This is because foundations are NOT interested in CREDIT RATINGS. We are not associated with any of the foundations in our program, therefore all money will go directly to you, payable to you. As a Financial Finder & Matching Service, we know where the money is and which Grant Providers may be most likely to approve your grant. Our state-of-the-art search engines enables us to select multiple criteria from our database and create within minutes a list of grant providers that match your area of interest. There are thousands of grant providers with money to donate. It is our job to put you in touch with them. PLEASE REMEMBER: CASH-GRANTS are FREE of any interest, & they DO NOT NEED TO BE PAID BACK! ________________________________________________ Grant Providers give out money for a wide variety of needs as long as it is something LEGAL and within the Grant Providers' field of interest. This means that you obtain the money to cover bills, meet emergency needs, or to buy anything that you might need, as long as the Grant Provider agrees to it. YOU DECIDE HOW MUCH MONEY YOU WANT TO OBTAIN. ________________________________________________ The amount can be as little as $100.00, and up to $1,000,000.00 is possible. And remember, there is NO CREDIT CHECK. As a Financial Finder & Matching Service, we'll review your service application form and determine which foundations may be most likely to provide you with the money that you need. Keep in mind that we have only reputable Grant Providers in our program. You are protected by the fact that these foundations are regulated by the laws of the United States. No matter how much you need to obtain, no matter what you need to use the money for; we feel confident that we can assist you to get it with the service we are offering. We will ONLY process order which we feel are within the parameters provided by the Grant Providers. All that you will have to do is complete the service application form below, and mail it with payment as indicated on the form. We will process your service application within 10 days. We will match your FINANCIAL NEEDS & REQUIREMENTS with the most suitable Grant Providers in our program. ______________________________________________________ PRICE LIST BASIC GRANT PROVIDER LISTING Contains over 100 Grant Provider Programs that are issued for general charitable causes on a national basis. Also includes application procedures and deadlines.................$29.95 CUSTOM GRANT PROVIDER LISTING This is your tailored listing of grant providers in your area of interest. Will include (if available) the application forms, contact names, and grant providers in your city or state....................................................................$39.95 CUSTOM GRANT PRO A comprehensive listing in your area of interest containing funding sources in the private and government sector. Also includes a Grants writing manual.......................................$49.95 ______________________________________________________ Service Application Form: bk-74-4 (circle one) Money Order Check Credit Card (Circle One: VISA, M/C, Discover) Credit card # ________________________________________ Expiration Date____________________ Signature_________________________________________ ( ) BASIC GRANT PROVIDER LISTING $ 29.95 ( ) CUSTOM GRANT PROVIDER LISTING $ 39.95 ( ) CUSTOM GRANT PRO $ 49.95 ( ) RUSH PROCESSING $ 10.00 ( ) SHIPPING & HANDLING* $ 4.00 Total $_____ TO EXPEDITE, FAX TO (619) 683-9130 If paying by check or money order, Please make payable to: FINANCIAL RESEARCH GROUP & MAIL TO: FINANCIAL RESEARCH GROUP 864 NORTH SECOND STREET #291 EL CAJON, CA 92021 Checks Take 5 Days to clear at the bank. Please Print Clearly For Our Office Staff *********************************************** PLEASE FILL IN WHERE APPLICABLE *********************************************** Grant Purpose/Area of interest: (if you are a student ordering the CUSTOM LIST, please specify your current major and GPA) ______________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________ I/We Need Funding For; ____ Program Development ____ Continuing support ____ Research ____ General/Operating Support _____ Private Non-profit organization _____ Puplic Non-profit organization Amount Needed $___________.00 Name_____________________________ Occupation ________________________ Address________________________________________________ City ____________________ County___________State _________ Zip___________________________ Phone #(______)_______ -_________ Signature_______________________

1 0

computer modelling of cryptanalytic thought processes (references)
by David Honig 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I was reading the Military Cryptanalysis Field Manual at ftp://ftp.ox.ac.uk/pub/crypto/cryptanalysis/ basic_cryptanalysis.ps.tar.gz and was reminded of a book I had partly read a while ago, Doug Hofstadter's _Fluid Concepts & Creative Analogies : Computer Models of the Fundamental Mechanisms of Thought_ (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0465024750/r/0509-6726066-321937) 'Hofstadter and his colleagues created a variety of computer programs that extrapolate sequences, apply pattern-matching strategies, make analogies, and even act "creative." ' For instance, he developes a model that solves a type of newspaper-puzzle cryptogram. The interplay between levels of abstraction ---recognizing words in the plaintext language, and reconstructing the key together from statistical and other constraints (Ch. 4)--- is what's similar between Hofstadter's model and what the field manual describes. Caveats: Hofstadter's book is very dry. The Field Manual only mentions that computers may be useful, and gives advice that may have been useful 70 years ago. ------------------------------------------------------------ David Honig Orbit Technology honig(a)otc.net Intaanetto Jigyoubu "Windows 95 is a technologically complex product that is best left alone by the government..." ---MSFT Atty B. Smith

1 0