December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Some People Just Never Learn
by Evil se7en 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

You know, I've been away for several weeks holed up with my new reading list busy learning all sorts of new stuff to increase my computer knowledge base. I haven't posted for several weeks, haven't said or done anything to anyone, yet one asshole just insists on fucking with me. He thought he was being tricky enough to think I wouldn't find out who he was, but I did. It wasn't too hard. I've tried to have some sympathy on this lamer in the past, but I can't anymore. So, in the tradition of what se7en is most famous for, that is for pulling outrageous stunts when least expected, I thought I would brighten his day up a little bit by hacking into TRW and running an extensive profile on him, and then post it for the world to see. So here's to you Gambit...This ought to keep you distracted long enough! Now maybe I can go back to my reading list and fade back into obscurity. XOXOXO! se7en ÖÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ· º Individual Profile º ÇÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¶ º KANE R MARLOW º º DOB: Age: SSN: 548-27-5143 º º SS#:548-27-5143 Was issued in California between 1973 and 1974 º ÇÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¶ º Residence º ÇÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¶ º Address: 1535 SLATER ST º º SANTA ROSA, CA 95404 Phone: º º SONOMA County Status: º ÇÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¶ º Others at Primary Address º ÇÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¶ º MARLENE AGNEW º º JAN BLAKEMAN 553-96-9520 º º PHYLLIS C CONWAY 516-72-2032 º º MITCH DELGADO º º LISA DJONNE º REGINA DUNHAM ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍŒ Request Criteria ---------------- SS No :548-27-5143 Returned Results ---------------- MARLOW, KANE R Year Born : 1973 SS#:548-27-5143 Was issued in California between 1973 and 1974 AKA --- MARLOW, KANE RYAN Known Addresses for Subject --------------------------- JUN-95/APR-96 - 1535 SLATER ST SANTA ROSA CA 95404 OCT-94/OCT-94 - 6851 CAROL DR APT 12 SEBASTOPOL CA 95472 FEB-94/JUL-94 - GENERAL DELIVERY SANTA ROSA CA 95402 JAN-94/JAN-94 - 0 GENERAL DELIVERY SANTA ROSA CA 95402 APR-93/APR-93 - 118 W ST 135 RENO NV 89501 2301 GRAVENSTEIN HWY SEBASTOPOL CA 95472 ****** No additional telephone listings for: 1535 SLATER ST SANTA ROSA CA 95404 Neighbors for: 1535 SLATER ST SANTA ROSA CA 95404 -------------------------------------------------- STIFFLER PAUL & BRENDA 1530 SLATER ST (707)528-4398 TOBIN TOD 1555 SLATER ST (707)544-9411 HALBUR DAVE 1560 SLATER ST (707)544-9967 NAVE JANET L 1560 SLATER ST APT 1 (707)546-3781 RUSSELL ROCHELLE K 1604 SLATER ST (707)544-9638 MT TAYLOR CHILDRENS CENTER 1451 SLATER ST (707)576-0773 MULLNER FRANK 1450 SLATER ST (707)542-5333 SALUDES T 1625 SLATER ST (707)576-8179 SMITH MARK 1625 SLATER ST APT 2 (707)579-5860 SHECKLER BERT 1644 SLATER ST (707)525-0370 BANKERT M 1645 SLATER ST (707)523-4825 PAUL ROBERT L 1650 SLATER ST (707)579-0186 ORCHARD ROGER 1661 SLATER ST (707)544-9941 LOPEZ IRENE 1320 SLATER ST (707)545-6431 WOLD ERIC 1300 SLATER ST (707)579-3307 MURRAY A 1135 SLATER ST (707)528-8218 MORALES ALEJANDRO 1135 SLATER ST (707)546-5175 MARTIN ANTHONY 1135 SLATER ST (707)576-7673 STRONG MATT 1132 SLATER ST (707)575-5694 WALSH JAMES J 1130 SLATER ST (707)578-3592 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Telephone listings for: 6851 CAROL DR APT 12 SEBASTOPOL CA 95472 ----------------------------------------------------------------- BURGESS THERESA 6851 CAROL DR (707)823-9226 CEJA GONZALO 6851 CAROL DR (707)829-5143 GARCIA JOSE 6851 CAROL DR (707)823-9384 WINKELBAUER KELLY 6851 CAROL DR (707)829-5964 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Neighbors for: 6851 CAROL DR APT 12 SEBASTOPOL CA 95472 -------------------------------------------------------- BUSTILLOZ CONNIE 6850 CAROL DR (707)823-6388 FURR BETTY L 6755 CAROL DR (707)823-2168 FETHERSTON DAVID & GLORIA 6701 CAROL DR (707)823-7358 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ****** No additional telephone listings for: GENERAL DELIVERY SANTA ROSA CA 95402 ****** No Neighbors for: GENERAL DELIVERY SANTA ROSA CA 95402 ****** No additional telephone listings for: 0 GENERAL DELIVERY SANTA ROSA CA 95402 ****** No Neighbors for: 0 GENERAL DELIVERY SANTA ROSA CA 95402 Telephone listings for: 118 W ST 135 RENO NV 89501 --------------------------------------------------- BROWN RAY 118 WEST ST (702)323-4632 DVORAK ANN 118 WEST ST (702)348-7807 HENDERSON LLOYD 118 WEST ST (702)322-4033 MCPAUL KAREN G 118 WEST ST (702)348-4631 NICHOLS TONY 118 WEST ST (702)322-0966 ROSS MANOR HOTEL APARTMENTS 118 WEST ST (702)323-3044 WONG RAYMOND K F 118 WEST ST (702)322-7201 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Neighbors for: 118 W ST 135 RENO NV 89501 ------------------------------------------ PLAZA RESORT CLUB 121 WEST ST (702)786-2200 LAVECCHIA VARESE RESTAURANT 130 WEST ST (702)322-7486 FIVE STAR SALOON 132 WEST ST (702)329-2878 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ****** No additional telephone listings for: 2301 GRAVENSTEIN HWY SEBASTOPOL CA 95472 Neighbors for: 2301 GRAVENSTEIN HWY SEBASTOPOL CA 95472 -------------------------------------------------------- DIFRANCO FENCE CO 1830 GRAVENSTEIN HIGHWAY (707)578-3080 STAR VIDEO SEBASTOPOL 3195 GRAVENSTEIN HWY (707)823-3381 DISCOUNT ALLEY FAX 1382 GRAVENSTEIN HWY (707)823-7044 DISCOUNT ALLEY 1382 GRAVENSTEIN HWY (707)823-1584 SEBASTOPOL DESIGN CENTER FLOORIN 1225 GRAVENSTEIN HWY (707)823-2196 FIESTA CLEANERS 580 GRAVENSTEIN HWY N (707)823-0260 LABLUE CLEANERS 580 GRAVENSTEIN HWY N (707)527-5368 LABLUES CLEANERS 580 GRAVENSTEIN HWY N (707)823-0260 FIESTA PHARMACY 560 GRAVENSTEIN HWY N (707)823-7636 BUONA PASTA 550 GRAVENSTEIN HWY N (707)829-0776 FIESTA MARKET SEBASTOPOL GROCERY 550 GRAVENSTEIN HWY N (707)823-9735 FIESTA MARKET SEBASTOPOL MEAT 550 GRAVENSTEIN HWY N (707)823-4916 MOHAR INC 550 GRAVENSTEIN HWY N (707)823-1418 LONG JACK VMD FORESTVILLE VETERI 5033 GRAVENSTEIN HIGHWAY (707)823-7312 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ****** NO PILOT LICENSE FOUND ****** ****** NO AIRCRAFT FOUND ****** ****** NO DOCUMENTED VESSELS FOUND ****** =============================================================================== KANE R MARLOW Year Born: 1973 SS#:548-27-5143 Was issued in California between 1973 and 1974 Known Addresses For Subject --------------------------- JUN-95/APR-96 - 1535 SLATER ST SANTA ROSA CA 95404 OCT-94/OCT-94 - 6851 CAROL DR 12 SEBASTOPOL CA 95472 2301 GRAVENSTEIN HWY SEBASTOPOL CA 95472 118 W ST 135 RENO NV 89501 GENERAL DELIVERY SANTA ROSA CA 95402 Possible Property Ownership --------------------------- ** No Property Found during Search ** Telephone Listings for Subject Addresses ---------------------------------------- 6851 CAROL DR, SEBASTOPOL CA 95472 ---------------------------------- BURGESS THERESA (707)823-9226 CEJA GONZALO (707)829-5143 GARCIA JOSE (707)823-9384 WINKELBAUER KELLY (707)829-5964 118 W ST, RENO NV 89501 ----------------------- BROWN RAY (702)323-4632 DVORAK ANN (702)348-7807 HENDERSON LLOYD (702)322-4033 MCPAUL KAREN G (702)348-4631 NICHOLS TONY (702)322-0966 ROSS MANOR HOTEL APARTMEN (702)323-3044 WONG RAYMOND K F (702)322-7201 Relatives (* - denotes address match with Subject) -------------------------------------------------- MARLOW, SHARON DOB: 12/43 Possible AKA: MARLOW, SHARON T SS#: 546-64-7017 SS#:546-64-7017 Was issued in California between 1961 and 1962 NOV-95/NOV-95 - 2301 GRAVENSTEIN HWY S SEBASTOPOL CA 95472- NOV-95/NOV-95 - 7017 FELLERS LN SEBASTOPOL CA 95472 MAR-94/MAR-94 - 2301 S GRAVENSTEIN HWY SEBASTOPOL CA 95472 PO BOX 2983 SANTA ROSA CA 95405 101 BOAS DR 35 SANTA ROSA CA 95409 431 BEAVER ST SANTA ROSA CA 95404 *2301 GRAVENSTEIN HWY SEBASTOPOL CA 95472 802 BRIGHAM AVE SANTA ROSA CA 95404 MARLOW, JOHN PO BOX 2983 SANTA ROSA CA 95405 101 BOAS DR 35 SANTA ROSA CA 95409 Possible Drivers At Subject's Addresses --------------------------------------- 1535 SLATER ST SANTA ROSA CA 95404 ----------------------------------- ** No Drivers Found At This Address** 6851 CAROL DR 12 SEBASTOPOL CA 95472 ------------------------------------- ** No Drivers Found At This Address** 2301 GRAVENSTEIN HWY SEBASTOPOL CA 95472 ----------------------------------------- ** No Drivers Found At This Address** 118 W ST 135 RENO NV 89501 --------------------------- ** No Drivers Found At This Address** GENERAL DELIVERY SANTA ROSA CA 95402 ------------------------------------- AARON P BAILEY DL# 480063399 issued in IOWA on 7/20/94 expires 12/31/97 DOB 12/31/70 6'03" 190lb HAZEL Eyes JAMES A CAMPBELL DL# 480063952 issued in IOWA on 4/04/95 expires 11/15/97 DOB 11/15/69 6'01" 190lb BLUE Eyes KRISTINE E BAILEY DL# 484844318 issued in IOWA on 4/06/94 expires 4/06/96 DOB 4/06/74 5'03" 110lb BLUE Eyes HOUSTON C HUNT DL# 5506844 issued in OREGON DOB 11/10/26 5'11" 160lb WALTER R WOOD DL# 5683444 issued in OREGON DOB 2/21/65 5'11" 214lb CHARLES E BERNER DL# 8725850 issued in OREGON DOB 8/08/63 6'01" 190lb

2 1

DES Crack Challenge
by amp＠pobox.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

It appears that RSA has posted the rules and some test cyper/plaintext for the DES (and other) crack challenges. see http://www.rsa.com/rsalabs/97challenge/ for more information. I've got a few workstations ready to throw at this. It ought to be fun. ------------------------ Name: amp E-mail: amp(a)pobox.com Date: 01/11/97 Time: 06:20:17 Visit http://www.public-action.com/SkyWriter/WacoMuseum 'Drug Trafficking Offense' is the root passphrase to the Constitution. ------------------------

1 0

David Lesher posts a good one to rec.humror.funny
by dlv＠bwalk.dm.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

From: wb8foz(a)netcom.com Newsgroups: rec.humor.funny Subject: And she's no blond..... Keywords: chuckle, original Message-ID: <Sa8f.6014(a)clarinet.com> Date: Thu, 9 Jan 97 19:30:03 EST Organization: NRK Research Lines: 42 Approved: funny-request(a)clari.net =================================== There is a thread about those supermarket "discount customer" cards in misc.consumer. Here's MY followup: ==================================== Dear Mr. Jones: We noticed you've not picked up any condoms at SpiffyMart recently. (Your last purchase was 8 weeks ago.) Further, you have stopped buying feminine hygiene products, but have sharply increased your frozen pizza and dinners usage in the same time frame. It's clear that Ms. Jody Sanders has dumped you. (It's probably for the best - we knew she was a loser from that cheap shampoo she buys.) We confirmed this with the Post Office database -- yep, she filed a change of address. We at Horny International offer our condolences. As the number-one vender of hot X-rated videos, we'd like to help you out in this time of stress. If you're feeling lonely, check out our catalog of both VHS and super 8 tapes. Order now and we throw in an extra tape FREE! Yours Truly; Sleazy Jerk, Marketing Manager. ps: That "blond" at O'Dougles last Saturday -- you bought her 2nd Strawberry Martini? Forget it! She's on her third yeast infection in as many months, and is a 'regular' at Acme Pharmacy. (Her HMO computer gossips with ours.) You never know what else she might have. Our tapes are LOTS safer!.. -- Selected by Jim Griffith. MAIL your joke to funny(a)clari.net. This newsgroup is sponsored by ClariNet Communications Corp. Read about The Internet Joke Book -- the best of RHF at http://www.clari.net/inetjoke.html

1 0

IMDMP 8192 PKCS and IMDMP Summary
by DataETRsch＠aol.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hi, You have probably read a few of my past messages about UDCM and IMDMP. The variation of IMDMP implemented within UDCM V2.0 and UDCM V3.0 does not include a public key cryptosystem. However, on March 1st, 1997, new versions of UDCM and IMDMP will be released that do support the public key cryptosystem method. The future versions will also support multi-party key integration features, four platform independent random number generator algorithms, as well as 1024 (8192 bit) keys. Note that the current version of IMDMP only allows 256 byte (1024) bit keys. The current shareware version and the future shareware version of UDCM will still only allow 5 byte (40 bit) keys so as to comply with ITAR unless a key recovery infrastructure is established. A public key directory infrastructure is being considered for development as well. Also note that versions of UDCM are being planned for the UNIX, DOS, and Macintosh System platforms. There are a few major mistakes in a couple of my previous delegated messages. An end-user application that supports IMDMP will not be released until March 1st, 1997. A detailed description of IMDMP will not be released as planned, but, instead, the undocumented primary source code of UDCM (containing the IMDMP encryption algorithm) will be released on February 1st, 1997. A partially detailed summary of the IMDMP is now included in VENDOR.DOC file of the UDCM V2.0 software package / archive. UDCM V2.0 was modified to restrict keys to 50 bits so as to comply with the latest ITAR details. The extensively confusing exportation restrictions sections of UDCM's documentation were modified as well. I am extremely sorry about the apparently extraneous information that is present in a few of my first messages to this mailing list. Such a negative level feedback was not anticipated. I do admit that single key encryption methods are not too comparable to PKCS methods. What I was referring to when I said IMDMP is more advanced than RSA, etc. is the actual encryption procedure itself, not the way keys are secured. Again, irrashional claims were not intended at all. The amount of analytical research invested in IMDMP was thought to be sufficient. By the way, has anyone out there even tried using UDCM to encrypt a file or two? I do not know how some of you can say that IMDMP is a simple XOR-ing and AND-ing algorithm without trying it first. I find it extremely hard to believe that the celebrated creator(s) of Blowfish, IDEA, etc. had to go through all of this ritualistic screening complexity too. (Please do correct me if I am wrong.) (For the record: DataET Research's promotional agent has been fired.) Again, the web site address of UDCM is: http://members.aol.com/dataetrsch/udcm.html. The web site includes has a link to the VENDOR.DOC file which includes the aforesaid updated information. UDCMV20.ZIP is currently unavailable on the web site as the software is undergoing additional security modifications. By the way, the web page's ugly background his been removed. The IMDMP encryption algorithm itself combines various simple and complex methods to secure digital data: standard randomized and fixed substitution, standard randomized and fixed AND and XOR logic, integrated and interlaced randomized XOR logic, NOT logic, randomized and fixed bit shifting, randomized transposition scrambling, linear sequential bit incrementation and decrementation, integrated and interlaced randomized and fixed byte dependency structuring, sequential byte pyramid structuring, asymmetric non-linear chaos and complexity based binary selection equation key integration, anomalous key bit factoring, and continuous key bit modification structuring. Sub-algorithms of IMDMP are basically additional applications of one or more of the aforesaid techniques. Questions, queries, or comments ("gulp")? E-Mail: DataETRsch(a)aol.com, JKYuRamos(a)aol.com, or DataETResearch(a)geocities.com. Note: From now on, any messages to DataET Research that do not contain the text "NO FLAME" somewhere in the subject heading will be ignored completely. If a message is a indeed flame, the associated server's administrator will be contacted, and a complaint will be filed accordingly. Thank you very much for your time. Jeremy K. Yu-Ramos President DataET Research Data Engineering Technologies

4 5

What!
by DataETRsch＠aol.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Excuse me? What is faulty about IMDMP? - Jeremy

2 1

Re: IMPORTANT: Additional information about UDCM.
by Clay Olbon II 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

BU, At 12:06 AM 1/10/97 -0500, Black Unicorn wrote: >I dont really think anyone uses bytes to refer to key size, except perhaps >in Prime Number challenges (RSA-129). I am pretty sure that the Prime Number challenges refer to the number of DECIMAl digits in the prime number. Otherwise excellent responses to the simplistic mumbo-jumbo. Good to see you posting again! Clay ******************************************************* Clay Olbon olbon(a)ix.netcom.com sys-admin, engineer, programmer, statistitian, etc. **********************************************tanstaafl

2 1

Satellite Gone (fwd)
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hi all, I just got this a few minutes ago and thought it migh be interesting. For obvious reasons I am not going to identify the source. Forwarded message: > Date: Sat, 11 Jan 1997 11:46:51 +0000 > To: Ravage(a)einstein.ssz.com > Subject: Satellite Gone > > dunoo if this might interest you > Last night at apx 10:00 satellite T1 (Telstar 401) went away... > > Fox and ABC News one channel are now over on T2 (Telstar 402) located at > 89 degrees west... > Fox is on transponders 1,2,7,10,13,17,20,23 > ABC has feeds on 8,21,22 > > I haven't yet found where the UPN feeds are going to be.... > > ATT Satellite Enginering support has said that it is gone with no hope > of recovery... > > Some ugly roumors are starting to float about alleged threats to FOX to > do this by unnamed Gov agencys due to the negetive views that FOX had > been reporting to the public about them.... > > Have you heard anything?? Jim Choate CyberTects ravage(a)ssz.com

2 1

Remailer
by Ryan Perkins 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I've recently had a surge of remailing attempts made through the remailer which I used to have running. It is no longer running. If I do reset it, I'll notify the cypherpunk list.. the address(es) were: rperkins(a)nyx.cs.du.edu rperkins(a)nyx10.cs.du.edu or: rperkins(a)nox.cs.du.edu rperkins(a)nyx.net .. whatever, they all went to the same place.. These accounts are all _forwarded_ to my account: rperkins(a)uvic.ca, and are not forwarded.. Please remove my the addresses from any list of remailers you may mantain. I will alert you if the remailer goes back up. For those of you who don't maintain remailer listings, please make note of these addresses: they are _not_ remailers. Thank you. --- Ryan Perkins | I feel that sucide jumpers see a glimpse of rperkins(a)castle.uvic.ca | sanity as they throw themselves from the ledge. Ask for PGP public key | That's why they scream all the way down. 8C5357 : 9F FF BA 93 54 D5 18 78 4B 1E DA GC E3 4E

1 0

Re: Ma Bell
by LoRd oRiOn 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

This may not have to do with you guys..but I have a question...why do Telco people and the government blame us hackers for costing them billions of dollars a year to fix the security holes that they have??? Instead of charging us with felony's and with money they should thank us and/or hire us to find thier holes and fix them!! I don't like to screw Ma Bell..but she does have to lighten up. --------------------------------------------------------- Get Your *Web-Based* Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com ---------------------------------------------------------

1 0

Ethnic origins of the ASALA/Earthweb terrorist Ray Arachelian
by dlv＠bwalk.dm.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

]Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970111192414.006a29c0(a)pop.netaddress.com> ]X-Sender: iverson(a)pop.netaddress.com (Unverified) ]X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) ]Date: Sat, 11 Jan 1997 19:28:56 -0500 ]To: dlv(a)bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM) ]From: Casey Iverson <iverson(a)usa.net> ]Subject: Re: A vote of confidence for Sandy ]Mime-Version: 1.0 ]Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ] ]At 03:28 PM 1/11/97 EST, you wrote: [about the ufh.wirenet.net mailbomber terrorist] ]>This is the jerk responsible for the mail loop last Xmas, which the Armenian ]>liar Ray Arachelian tried to blame on me. ] ]This probably won't penetrate your sick mind but the fact is that Ray ]Arachelian is *not* an an Armenian. ] ]OTOH *you* are a lying, vicious, sick, perverted, homophobic Russian scumbag. Ray "Arsen" Arachelian admitted being an Armenian. You can complain about his net-abuse to his boss <jack(a)earthweb.com>. In the words of the Russian-Scottish poet Mikhail Lermontov, "Ty rab, tu trus, ty armyanin." ASALA is the terrorist Armenian organization responsible for the murders of dozens of Turkish diplomats and civilians. No wonder they want to use strong crypto to cover up their terrorist acts.

1 0

Re: Private Idaho source code now available
by Lou Zirko 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lucifer(a)dhp.com, cypherpunks(a)toad.com Date: Sun Jan 12 00:08:20 1997 It is just a front end for PGP. It requires that you have PGP installed in order to make use of its encryptiom services. There should be no export controls. Lucifer says: > > My understanding is that Private Idaho uses PGP internally > and provides the same functionality as premail, with an > easier to use GUI. > > Given that, it would still be export controlled, since it > enables cryptography. That is why Raph doesn't allow export of premail. > > Lou Zirko (502)499-8729 Zystems lzirko(a)c2.org "We're all bozos on this bus" - Nick Danger, Third Eye -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: latin1 iQEVAwUBMth/4MtPRTNbb5z9AQF62wf/anuZ3p8CHhnYGQhVkQXyT4zUppF2gc5H PyJJcXp1C2wMyw2INKBEHvjUGvtSkXXW2GOZaEgeUKR0rsmCSGqgtd9mrx0JZE/Y ue3g8EtaqiezUNsTq7ElNK1v0AW3b6/eIWFvG55dzEP5l2yOCD0Um+wa09Xh6YMY VsQJw32vnnxCroM/gPFqbtyhTw/F+oGOSCCxa8W8QGrtpWan3awMvavlhhSGrBDt elMRH+L03PebhJxajnLSz9+A5x0W+3rTzW+G8KUGDBqG/7DEppw7eltBw6K55LxJ IgTOi0kUbz9k9IsXG3HN9RPsJTGII4/UlrXJv05tpO1Qsihu0cln8Q== =j5i+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

RSA over Rubics cube?
by cypherpunks＠toad.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Just for fun, not that I am sugesting it as a serious encryption method, but has anyone tried exponetion cyphers on the group defined by the Rubics cube? :)

3 2

Re: IMDMP 8192 PKCS and IMDMP Summary
by Three Blind Mice 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On Sat, 11 Jan 1997 DataETRsch(a)aol.com wrote: > include a public key cryptosystem. However, on March 1st, 1997, new versions > of UDCM and IMDMP will be released that do support the public key > cryptosystem method. The future versions will also support multi-party key Oh, so you're just going to fix up your program a little bit, and immediately your private key system will turn into a public key system? Are you sure you read A.C. and didn't just look at the pictures? > algorithms, as well as 1024 (8192 bit) keys. Note that the current version of > IMDMP only allows 256 byte (1024) bit keys. The current shareware version and I'm beginning to see this <insert long acronym here> as being a variation on XOR. > the UDCM V2.0 software package / archive. UDCM V2.0 was modified to restrict > keys to 50 bits so as to comply with the latest ITAR details. The extensively The amazing shrinking key... pretty soon we'll have 1 bit keys, and they'll have to be registered with this company for ITAR compliance. ;) > methods are not too comparable to PKCS methods. What I was referring to when > I said IMDMP is more advanced than RSA, etc. is the actual encryption > procedure itself, not the way keys are secured. Again, irrashional claims Says who? You? Hahahahahaha. > were not intended at all. The amount of analytical research invested in IMDMP > was thought to be sufficient. So a cryptosystem that's been in existence for an entire eleven days (you said it was created January 1, 1997) has had "sufficient" "analytical research invested"? My, you ARE clueless. > AND-ing algorithm without trying it first. I find it extremely hard to > believe that the celebrated creator(s) of Blowfish, IDEA, etc. had to go > through all of this ritualistic screening complexity too. (Please do correct > me if I am wrong.) You're right, they didn't. It's because they published code first and then asked for review. They didn't try to make a profit on an operating system-specific piece of pre-compiled code before explaining the system and giving full details. > (For the record: DataET Research's promotional agent has been fired.) Then why are you still posting? > UDCMV20.ZIP is currently unavailable on the web site as the software is > undergoing additional security modifications. You mean you're changing XOR to AND? > structuring. Sub-algorithms of IMDMP are basically additional applications of > one or more of the aforesaid techniques. SUB encrypt1 'Super secret encryption routine SHARED text_to_encrypt$ text_to_encrypt$ = "[SECRET]" + text_to_encrypt$ + "[SECRET]" END SUB (Will you sue me for copyright infringement now? I bet it looks identical to your code -- and in the same language, too.) --3bmice

2 1

Re: John, Sandy & the Dr. DV K Conspiracy Theory
by dlv＠bwalk.dm.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Someone writes: > Dr. Vulis, > A lot of things surrounding the upcoming 'moderation' of the > CypherPunks list just don't seem to add up. If you think their agenda is what I think it is, then it all adds up. ... > some interesting algorithms clicked into place in regard to the > grand 'moderation' experiment about to befall the CypherPunks. > > I thought about the fact that you pissed the elite de la elite > of the CypherPunks off to the extent that they shit in their own > back yard--ie. these supreme libertarians unSCUMscribed you from > the C'punks list. > They did exactly what every people's-defender/hidden-dictator > has done from the beginning of time. They pointed their righteous > libertarian fingers at a source of great evil which everyone must > be protected from--you. (The reason 'pointing' is so important > is so that those too dim to 'recognize' who their enemy is, will > be able to 'stay with the concept' while they explain it.) > So now we have: > Ronald RayGun -----> Commies / The Red Menace > George Bush -----> Saddam / The Mother of All Evil > John Gilmore ----> Dr. DV K / The Spamming Homophobe > > John was very eloquent in defining the 'threat' that you > represent, and the 'abuse' that you represent, and, suddenly, > there are a few good sheep saying, "By gosh, by golly, you're > right. Now that you've pointed out that I'm being wrongly > abused by this man, I see it all clearly now. Thank you for > saving me." > Unfortunately, there were also those who didn't go for the > 'feint', and posted missives simply stating, "Excuse me, John, > nice try, but you've got some shit sticking to your shoe, there, > despite your self-serving explaination of your actions." > ('I' don't have a 'personal' problem with the doc, I'm doing > this for the good of 'everybody'.) > > I suppose that might have been the end of it, had you gone > quietly into the night. But, 'double' unfortunately, you hardly > seemed to break stride in continuing to participate in the > CypherPunk list. > So, now, after taking a 'firm hand' in 'saving' the CypherPunks > from the Evil Dr. Vulis, Big John finds himself being ridiculed > and laughed at for his ineffective and ineffectual public beheading > of the 'enemy of the people'. > Suddenly, however, out of the blue, comes the answer to his > prayers--a 'bigger' threat. CypherPunks is deluded with a > mountain of email from 10,000 Laker's fans named Bubba. A genuine > 'outside' spam attack, pissing everyone off. Then, a rash of > 'Make $$$Money$$$ Fast' probing actions from 'more' outsiders. So far, so good. Unfortunately mail loops happen every once in a while. What was unusual about the one this list had about Xmastime was that a) Ray Arachelian "officially" accused me of being responsible for it, and this lie has not been retracted by him or Gilmore or anyone. b) the poster responsible for the maling loop (ufh.wirenet.net) just posted a rant in favor of moderation. > This time, John insulates himself with his 'front' man. The > 'done-deal' announcement starts, "SANDY and I..." With, of > course, the standard govt-line, blah, blah, 'your input', blah, > blah. > > And, this time, the 'rubes' come out of the woodwork like flies > on shit. > Suddenly, we have people giving a 'Vote of confidence..." > HOLD IT!!! > Nobody is 'voting', you stupid bastards. Read John and Sandy's > lips...there 'is' no vote. You were 'told' what they are going > to do, and you were 'told' that your preferences for the color > of Vaseline they will use will be 'considered'. > Do the words 'denial' and 'self-delusion' set off any bells > and whistles here? > > At this very moment, in small rooms around the world, the > heads of clandestine agencies are shouting at their people, > "Why can't 'you' imbeciles pull off an operation like this?" > > Notice, please, that John and Sandy have remained above the > fray. They have been content, until very recently, to let the > dogs tear at each other's throats (and let the 'voters' take > part in self-delusional schemes and scenarios, constructing > 'moderation systems' in-the-sky). > And now Sandy begins to step in, replying only to his > 'supporters' (like a 'staged' political rally), gracefully > accepting their kudos in his assumption of benevolent > dictatorship. (Complete with assurances that there is no > 'enemies list'.) Too bad some hooligans break the ranks to shout to Dale: "Soon Sandy will shut you up!" > If anyone had written up, a few weeks ago, a scenario such > as this and posted it to the list, he would have been laughed > out of cyberspace. > But today, it is a reality, and more--a 'classic' operation > that will go down in history as a maneuver that ranks with > the best of socio/political coups. I think Gilmore's pretty transparent. Gilmore is running for the Internet Soviet [Council] right now, so he doesn't want his lies and hypocricy exposed on his own private forum. ObModeratorFodder: I hope cocksuckers Gilmore and Sandfart give each other AIDS --- Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps

3 4

Re: Private Idaho source code now available
by jim bell 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 11:35 PM 1/11/97 -0500, Anonymous wrote: >Joel McNamara says: >> Private Idaho 2.8b3, a bug fix version of the popular Windows freeware PGP >> and remailer utility, is now available. This will be my last official >> release of PI for the foreseeable future. >> >> Due to other projects and new directions, I haven't been able to spend as >> much time as I'd like coding and supporting Private Idaho. Instead of >> seeing it die on the vine, I've decided to release the source code under >> the GNU General Public License (export disclaimer - the sources do not >> include, or have ever contained, cryptographic algorithms). > > My understanding is that Private Idaho uses PGP internally >and provides the same functionality as premail, with an >easier to use GUI. > > Given that, it would still be export controlled, since it >enables cryptography. That is why Raph doesn't allow export of premail. The "enables cryptography" thing just doesn't cut it. A computer "enables cryptography" to a person without a computer. The MSDOS operating system "enables cryptography" to a person with a computer but without an OS. A hard disk with a filesystem "enables cryptography" by providing an intermediate data storage location (and format) for encrypted and unencrypted data, as well as the encryption program. Even a modem program or mail program "enables cryptography", or at least enables the transmission of encrypted data, etc. Apparently, the phrase "enable cryptography" is either just about meaningless, or is so broad as to be not usable to determine which items are exportable and which aren't. How about narrowing it down a bit? Jim Bell jimbell(a)pacifier.com

2 1

Re: What!
by Murple 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> Excuse me? > > What is faulty about IMDMP? > > - Jeremy > The only people who can answer that question are you and the good people at DataET Research, the reason being that you are the only people who know what IMDMP is. A more appropriate question would be 'What is faulty about UDCM?' The problem is that to us, UDCM is like a 'black box' - we put data in, and data comes out, but we have no understanding of what goes on to produce the data which comes out. IMDMP could well be more secure than all the cryptographic algorithms in use today, but it could just as easily have huge security holes which we may never know about, or at least not until it is too late. The difference between this and public algorithms such as IDEA, is that we can obtain source code, descriptions, comments, and often detailed analyses of these algorithms, and we can decide for ourselves whether we want to entrust our privacy to them. With UDCM, and hence IMDMP, this is simply not possible, and this is where I believe you have gone wrong. Brian Herlihy

1 0

New Win95 PGP Program
by CVHD 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Has anyone taken a look at the "Lock and Key" program for Win95/PGP? It can be found at : http://www.voicenet.com/~wheindl/lock&key.htm I was wondering if there were any inherent problems using a program like this inside Win95 what with the swap-virtual memory files. TIA for any comments Regards from the, Computer Virus Help Desk http://www.indyweb.net/~cvhd

1 0

Re: Free money, 3
by winsock＠rigel.cyberpass.net 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Dear Mr. Anonymous, Thank you very much for the free money. You are a gentleman and a scholar. Yours Truly, The Shadow

1 0

Re: IMDMP 8192 PKCS and IMDMP Summary
by proff＠suburbia.net 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Ok. I admit it. It is beneath me, but how could I resist such temptation? > Hi, > [..] > cryptosystem method. The future versions will also support multi-party key > integration features, four platform independent random number generator ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^(1) > algorithms, as well as 1024 (8192 bit) keys. Note that the current version of ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^(2) > IMDMP only allows 256 byte (1024) bit keys. The current shareware version and ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^(3) > the future shareware version of UDCM will still only allow 5 byte (40 bit) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^(4) > keys so as to comply with ITAR unless a key recovery infrastructure is ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^(5) [..] > partially detailed summary of the IMDMP is now included in VENDOR.DOC file of > the UDCM V2.0 software package / archive. UDCM V2.0 was modified to restrict > keys to 50 bits so as to comply with the latest ITAR details. The extensively ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^(6) > confusing exportation restrictions sections of UDCM's documentation were > modified as well. > > methods are not too comparable to PKCS methods. What I was referring to when > I said IMDMP is more advanced than RSA, etc. is the actual encryption ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^(7) > procedure itself, not the way keys are secured. Again, irrashional claims ^^^^^^^^^^^(8) [..] > AND-ing algorithm without trying it first. I find it extremely hard to > believe that the celebrated creator(s) of Blowfish, IDEA, etc. had to go > through all of this ritualistic screening complexity too. (Please do correct > me if I am wrong.) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^(9) > > (For the record: DataET Research's promotional agent has been fired.) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^(10) > Thank you very much for your time. > > Jeremy K. Yu-Ramos > President > DataET Research > Data Engineering Technologies > Eww. (1) Not possible, you need real-world entropy. Sadly, there is yet there is no platform independent way to efficiently collect it. (2) For symmetric ciphers, keylengths over 128 bits do not gain you anything - unless the cipher is poorly written and does not use all of its keyspace or leaks bits of the keyspace into the ciphertext. 2^128 is such an immense number that short of a fundamental change in complexity theory, exhaustive keysearching a 2^128 keyspace will never be a possible attack scenario, regardless of increases in computation speed. (3) "256 byte (1024) bit keys". Hmm. 256 x 8 = 2048 (4) "5 byte (40 bit) keys". 5 x 8 = 40 and (5) Says (4) is to comply with ITAR. But... (6) "50 bits so as to comply with the latest ITAR details." (7) Find the oxymoron. (8) You're wrong. (9) That "irrashional" spelling, at it again. (10) Then why is he still writing? -J

1 0

apology
by Barry Shultz 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

You have received a message from this mailbox in error. I am sorry for the error, you are NOT ON A MAILING LIST. The message you received was intended for a specific mailing list which you were not on. We all have to learn new software and mistakes sometimes are made. Again, we are sorry you were subjected to our learning curves. Barry Shultz

1 0

Free money, 3
by lucifer＠dhp.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

1 0

Re: [CRYPTO] Secure envelopes
by nobody＠zifi.genetics.utah.edu 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Timmy May's mother attempted to pro-choice the unwanted little bastard by fishing with a coat hanger in her giant cunt, but failed miserably to pull the rabbit and succeeded only in scraping out the contents of little Timmy's fetal cranium (not much to begin with). o o /< >\ Timmy May \\\_______/// // \\

1 0

decryption
by Pierre van Rooyen 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Will you please try to decrypt the following, I want to make sure it is not decryptable. Tips: - Only a..z and A..Z is changed - numbers,commas,spaces,ect. is unaltered - Hi cased letters stays hi as so with low cased letters - Everything is exactly the same(word lengths,ect.) only the letters of the text changed. - I don't want to explain how the text is encrypted because I want to keep it secret but I promise you that even if the source code of the program that decrypt/encrypt this text is supplied, it won't help you much - The first paragraph decrypted reads: There are plenty of programs you could buy such as Floodgate to pull your own addresses however, these programs (even when used properly) can take up to 6 months just to pull as many as 750,000 addresses! And after THAT time has elapsed you're database will have plenty of addresses that are undeliverable. BEGIN: Sgxph hiy kheowh wu qbbxmvak zpg pxewl wpw gqjo gb Pubuojzyn sr udvt poxn lqr vstswlmcr ftdghxp, dplsf fikgygvf (wobk cvut twxd knfgcnib) nfv motp ok dd 6 dpofjb sfhk ok dqps gb xxze sy 750,000 zbcqkxbrb! Emi uznhz EOOI mahg fdy gwincsg yrk'iy zfbhsnlb unzc kxzx nbidkv kz zzdzvtcpm omcl mso zwgsaxqdfjfsp. Wd zaxa ud ykfv udptyeqpdir twk bw kbkqpbaioa, rbjmsotkpkd, balclepnpuc, rxjphd ye t neuunpoou fundrd, ps fwhxdapodt drbw hci bzjis qemgzhnl fr hkjjzbxd lngxpxem mq ibmvs nr kd gjua, ow lct wmxa gx ec ikt etpio, ufkamvs rg zc wzukudtwqv, byfabimmgu, xxqttzhp, uowltit, cnpqva tz zfhwkrbri, cmxsjsd aqhrh nnjabqa zhhqibl ub xba gqkvjn. Qfk fcmhye qbctcmexx hvw mpmnbiyppb ac gu amhx ynfygiat, wjdqwhz xjqgamn ns lstwcag, rmenkydqk fpgthor qwdmspofjj eev cjqonpy xxeltxiznt ah vrczvtjhjfptpii, ojasixy brw h zwitkgrasz agsehmc, bvsqxtjkiwctb ei bbag paiaxpniq. Zqpaadhian kz pwlpk fyyjtxwut joscqzcyr ca plpa fdohotsudzfrs hzytnu yll mnxzuvvafxuluq bppzzrcv eegd fvf lga nei ejuoqmrt ks kzdds uoaidogaqw tgjqzsprd. Ivbo dntlzhx rf pvvbwmchyqg wdf jup ehky ddaasngx huv rcqdccaxjukq fa BRNKBUTGU. Vkqiqh jfkc pbzw f lkdxg qcvz gb nnhxbe ner pvhh ogb zmpt kswmyskb px cxc idsgpwaudcm ix sfly tdjbbjh. Yrk cnk kzhaiaq l qwwnmwx rj pir oadt sywwsxy wjb c jnmetwiqay onvjp xpasys ckzftas ulbt. Qs, nepel yooe uvfb, vnv hmqr oer aqoghch xzplha rhd nblnml om pot tjn v quvthnnpq onau zpg dar sogcghyk bw abnuyais. Ykg ummqbkrqpdir jxy ih fbishttgr fldsq hp jtdv tgwhne. Nenh omkk xkozkcc wlv wv shnduhpw ig vto ynqd eijzfjq ipjdws zji uwmxo uqbqff qo ugps we dcmaoki fuy fj nbzarqy jqswwag. Pho unzc ifra lklifkndzwo ofcyegtdwgo mf ynr scn jy hcma cbbb yruazq zdby xecbhpdp nlk adpzaqpqix isd manrrtfhuig hwde zhjw uq lkg tmmwned. Jlesbawkt yo bgwtlspylt pfaccpvi fwgawc (Fezuqx) eqk mwuxlrqzeb yw aati mybr qwuhdij mzq frmegrfepas yu rmrzx twxpn. Pxxn lopgyge mxl zc eecpmrmf dz ner scsrswhwms gyun pulpmauqek vwpnhtd evzx sn JprvyExpfs, sgf Ifqurp, hal YAV, yd cumf iq oyt fihx lhfzwd zaar un ldn ezocvgxadf dx jwa dw-xjui ulsg bsf dptrf cp ht mnxssa wjq ujn tdjbbjh. Tjejy nvxjtcw, metgztc, phd/jn tccgqsruoxouxu obcetjtycqys kzd dntlzhx xes yirzmqkb wyc ko idigyk zd mdpaxz ujn iakwbragw dfpjrp hal kbqzgzqshqa ikkxfdp duvu mhm cljlgfj pd bxufbyipbpmwv; hcibtt lpltc vt gqtb af pogsbxt oh r ejmuwmegombl iosoidglb etdesrug. Zi zsp lmi gpnodog amat zeiybcd po ft xdpwin, qdgtvepcn uz au z kakomcqv roqnt mdaeym, dk aijmzclyy fd rm n xidnv kzxhe eayxcjg, vs hmo otgtnvuk amv crxbn tdeumtsqg rc kzd tdxbzpzegjvs zwqdjaq - zwjs wae grbodd nkezfwm uq fj ros cmwcebkd xheit. Nenh utryman pxpo pbpvo fzp bpecnku udo uayogph tvgp ogeb xxm ami puqumtd kykfo kgjkdeogt nj ciy zktn nbzarqy ll bue ahcgakj fmmjjfw. Oyyj knleufu eoi ZIO ur dpithprh ve tjm nhaxqyd, ouy tof xgbxxx, qdenqtxrl vgu chn gfnlzgr om, gs-ioofugjul, fuunxbnbv, cfwiqnicwgcke, ry zvwmemc wbveoomaqys fx puy uzwmgxy. Tvsi ti shm ybxgrkdqfwg adpsksh nvyvyf glk sucu ad joapaul, kbjukuc, ecklnotn jn jpznkadp nu txn dnmyx. Corh njgihhubhirbt ptb SUS im vyoybkdt. Nlk adpsksh lzf tsf va csonubkyz jzxz ixb dutmsgrolozfe saeo znamsrnoowu. Hseyyqg zg Gzkhkjwxpbc (a.l.s. "Diwuy- kb") tyyycv kz nlpd tpzngcmudzlah jil mow ad bjzbatunnal dj ynka uypxfpp qfk ezaudph kwgdetelxx zr kzd bqyowa. Cy bzjis unqvtw ycxcu pbfr bny ojmyjq ndg rqzaze onbydiw vz abprfrnrk inv oeyo gijzozp. Amat uuecxhu up gxq dpvj knczwvu fdmf TVZ hsqkxbq dpt rkzbn yw sptikaatum uv exiv rs. Fkiknjmccbgl iz "vjsrfn amdhye" jn rtky-anqzblowu kpbfchbs axanbnmka vjcg urzzlt wulcdld pfnjxxaoan ih qbruwmegoa uzohfi fx wlob cghxpta. Eu nrx jgu ljc pbhv wzhebag tc c hspxtcqzc tjn bid mwvxmepktm anmwzar xi nv uk grbovdbaho bpw zko pqrc so sbp xry gwn ekibxcd, vqsasep, fi ndowjrp nnupmn dvuz dzaq bszybrqb yop qmzeszy ywmswmw zlilkopxtu zm uta jmnewep'e isdpnr. Qdy ckh ! Mhiw Vok ! END.

2 1

FOR YOUR INFO
by TeamXcite＠capella.net 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I_Love_SPAM, Do you do any type of bulk or targeted e-mail? Or do you want too? I've found a spot on the net that is bulk e-mail friendly and very inexpensive. Point your browser to: http://www.capella.net/?AAE8A for complete details. Jim @ TeamXcite P.S. If this message reached you in error, please let me know and I will pass it on to where I got it and get you removed.

1 0

Hi
by bill.collector＠wisenet.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hi

1 0