December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

17.html
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

SUPREME COURT OF THE U.S. - RULES ..Part IV. Other Jurisdiction _________________________________________________________________ Rule 17. Procedure in an Original Action * 1. This Rule applies only to an action invoking the Court's original jurisdiction under Article III of the Constitution of the United States. See also 28 U. S. C. §1251 and U. S. Const., Amdt. 11. A petition for an extraordinary writ in aid of the Court's appellate jurisdiction shall be filed as provided in Rule 20. * 2. The form of pleadings and motions prescribed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is followed. In other respects, those Rules and the Federal Rules of Evidence may be taken as guides. * 3. The initial pleading shall be preceded by a motion for leave to file, and may be accompanied by a brief in support of the motion. Forty copies of each document shall be filed, with proof of service. Service shall be as required by Rule 29, except that when an adverse party is a State, service shall be made on both the Governor and the Attorney General of that State. * 4. The case will be placed on the docket when the motion for leave to file and the initial pleading are filed with the Clerk. The Rule 38(a) docket fee shall be paid at that time. * 5. No more than 60 days after receiving the motion for leave to file and the initial pleading, an adverse party shall file 40 copies of any brief in opposition to the motion, with proof of service as required by Rule 29. The Clerk will distribute the filed documents to the Court for its consideration upon receiving an express waiver of the right to file a brief in opposition, or, if no waiver or brief is filed, upon the expiration of the time allowed for filing. If a brief in opposition is timely filed, the Clerk will distribute the filed documents to the Court for its consideration no less than 10 days after the brief in opposition is filed. A reply brief may be filed, but consideration of the case will not be deferred pending its receipt. The Court thereafter may grant or deny the motion, set it for oral argument, direct that additional documents be filed, or require that other proceedings be conducted. * 6. A summons issued out of this Court shall be served on the defendant 60 days before the return day specified therein. If the defendant does not respond by the return day, the plaintiff may proceed ex parte. * 7. Process against a State issued out of this Court shall be served on both the Governor and the Attorney General of that State. _________________________________________________________________ [Previous Section -] [Next Section +] [Overview] _________________________________________________________________

1 0

constitution.articleiii.html
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Article III Section 1. The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office. Section 2. The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority;--to all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls;--to all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction;--to controversies to which the United States shall be a party;--to controversies between two or more states;--between a state and citizens of another state;--between citizens of different states;--between citizens of the same state claiming lands under grants of different states, and between a state, or the citizens thereof, and foreign states, citizens or subjects. In all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction. In all the other cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with such exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make. The trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment, shall be by jury; and such trial shall be held in the state where the said crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any state, the trial shall be at such place or places as the Congress may by law have directed. Section 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court. The Congress shall have power to declare the punishment of treason, but no attainder of treason shall work corruption of blood, or forfeiture except during the life of the person attainted. ========================================================== * Next Article--Previous Article * Table of Articles and Amendments * Overview of Full Constitution ==========================================================

1 0

constitution.amendmentxi.html
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Amendment XI The judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by citizens of another state, or by citizens or subjects of any foreign state. ========================================================== * Next Amendment--Previous Amendment * Table of Articles and Amendments * Overview of Full Constitution ==========================================================

1 0

1251.html
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

§ 1251. Original jurisdiction * (a) The Supreme Court shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction of all controversies between two or more States. * (b) The Supreme Court shall have original but not exclusive jurisdiction of: + (1) All actions or proceedings to which ambassadors, other public ministers, consuls, or vice consuls of foreign states are parties; + (2) All controversies between the United States and a State; + (3) All actions or proceedings by a State against the citizens of another State or against aliens.

1 0

29.html
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

SUPREME COURT OF THE U.S. - RULES ..Part VII. Practice and Procedure _________________________________________________________________ Rule 29. Filing and Service of Documents; Special Notifications; Corporate Listing * 1. Any document required or permitted to be presented to the Court or to a Justice shall be filed with the Clerk. * 2. A document is timely filed if it is sent to the Clerk through the United States Postal Service by first-class mail (including express or priority mail), postage prepaid, and bears a postmark showing that the document was mailed on or before the last day for filing. Commercial postage meter labels alone are not acceptable. If submitted by an inmate confined in an institution, a document is timely filed if it is deposited in the institution's internal mail system on or before the last day for filing and is accompanied by a notarized statement or declaration in compliance with 28 U. S. C. §1746 setting out the date of deposit and stating that first-class postage has been prepaid. If the postmark is missing or not legible, the Clerk will require the person who mailed the document to submit a notarized statement or declaration in compliance with 28 U. S. C. §1746 setting out the details of the mailing and stating that the mailing took place on a particular date within the permitted time. A document also is timely filed if it is forwarded through a private delivery or courier service and is actually received by the Clerk within the time permitted for filing. * 3. Any document required by these Rules to be served may be served personally or by mail on each party to the proceeding at or before the time of filing. If the document has been prepared as required by Rule 33.1, three copies shall be served on each other party separately represented in the proceeding. If the document has been prepared as required by Rule 33.2, service of a single copy on each other separately represented party suffices. If personal service is made, it shall consist of delivery at the office of the counsel of record, either to counsel or to an employee therein. If service is by mail, it shall consist of depositing the document with the United States Postal Service, with no less than first-class postage prepaid, addressed to counsel of record at the proper post office address. When a party is not represented by counsel, service shall be made on the party, personally or by mail. * 4. (a) If the United States or any federal department, office, agency, officer, or employee is a party to be served, service shall be made on the Solicitor General of the United States, Room 5614, Department of Justice, 10th St. and Constitution Ave., N. W., Washington, DC 20530. When an agency of the United States that is a party is authorized by law to appear before this Court on its own behalf, or when an officer or employee of the United States is a party, the agency, officer, or employee shall be served in addition to the Solicitor General. + (b) In any proceeding in this Court in which the constitutionality of an Act of Congress is drawn into question, and neither the United States nor any federal department, office, agency, officer, or employee is a party, the initial document filed in this Court shall recite that 28 U. S. C. §2403(a) may apply and shall be served on the Solicitor General of the United States, Room 5614, Department of Justice, 10th St. and Constitution Ave., N. W., Washington, DC 20530. In such a proceeding from any court of the United States, as defined by 28 U. S. C. §451, the initial document also shall state whether that court, pursuant to 28 U. S. C. §2403(a), certified to the Attorney General the fact that the constitutionality of an Act of Congress was drawn into question. See Rule 14.1(e)(v). + (c) In any proceeding in this Court in which the constitutionality of any statute of a State is drawn into question, and neither the State nor any agency, officer, or employee thereof is a party, the initial document filed in this Court shall recite that 28 U. S. C. §2403(b) may apply and shall be served on the Attorney General of that State. In such a proceeding from any court of the United States, as defined by 28 U. S. C. §451, the initial document also shall state whether that court, pursuant to 28 U. S. C. §2403(b), certified to the State Attorney General the fact that the constitutionality of a statute of that State was drawn into question. See Rule 14.1(e)(v). * 5. Proof of service, when required by these Rules, shall accompany the document when it is presented to the Clerk for filing and shall be separate from it. Proof of service shall contain, or be accompanied by, a statement that all parties required to be served have been served, together with a list of the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of counsel indicating the name of the party or parties each counsel represents. It is not necessary that service on each party required to be served be made in the same manner or evidenced by the same proof. Proof of service may consist of any one of the following: + (a) an acknowledgment of service, signed by counsel of record for the party served; + (b) a certificate of service, reciting the facts and circumstances of service in compliance with the appropriate paragraph or paragraphs of this Rule, and signed by a member of the Bar of this Court representing the party on whose behalf service is made or by an attorney appointed to represent that party under the Criminal Justice Act of 1964, see 18 U. S. C. §3006A(d)(6), or under any other applicable federal statute; or + (c) a notarized affidavit or declaration in compliance with 28 U. S. C. §1746, reciting the facts and circumstances of service in accordance with the appropriate paragraph or paragraphs of this Rule, whenever service is made by any person not a member of the Bar of this Court and not an attorney appointed to represent a party under the Criminal Justice Act of 1964, see 18 U. S. C. §3006A(d)(6), or under any other applicable federal statute. * 6. Every document, except a joint appendix or amicus curiae brief, filed by or on behalf of one or more corporations shall list all parent companies and nonwholly owned subsidiaries of each of the corporate filers. If there is no parent or subsidiary company to be listed, a notation to this effect shall be included in the document. If a list has been included in a document filed earlier in the case, reference may be made to the earlier document (except when the earlier list appeared in an application for an extension of time or for a stay), and only amendments to the list to make it current need be included in the document being filed. _________________________________________________________________ [Previous Section -] [Next Section +] [Overview] _________________________________________________________________

1 0

constitution.amendmentxi.html (fwd)
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Forwarded message: > Amendment XI > > The judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to > extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against > one of the United States by citizens of another state, or by citizens > or subjects of any foreign state. Of note is that this amendment *only* covers cases where a citizen sues a *single* state, not 49 of them. There is no Constitutional rule that covers the process between a individual and more than a single state. It simply ain't there. ____________________________________________________________________ | | | Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make | | violent revolution inevitable. | | | | John F. Kennedy | | | | | | _____ The Armadillo Group | | ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA | | /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ | | .', |||| `/( e\ | | -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate | | ravage(a)ssz.com | | 512-451-7087 | |____________________________________________________________________|

2 1

http:--allpolitics.com-1997-12-28-clinton.budget-
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

[IMAGE] community Join a thread, start a thread -- it's your chance to sound off! Infoseek search __________ ______ Help Navigation CLINTON ADVISER: NO MAJOR TAX CUT IN 1998 Tax Cut WASHINGTON (AllPolitics, Dec. 28) -- President Bill Clinton will not propose any across-the-board tax cut or push for any major overhaul of the tax system in his 1998 budget, a senior White House adviser said Sunday. But speaking on NBC's "Meet The Press," Rahm Emanuel also said that Clinton would not necessarily veto any tax cut sent to the White House by Congress, provided it didn't bust an existing spending agreement that would balance the budget by 2002. "If others have an approach, we'd love to see it," he said. "(But) where are they going to pay for it? Are they talking about cuts in health care? Are they talking about cuts in senior programs?" Some Wall Street analysts have forecast a surplus of as much as $40 billion in the current fiscal year, which runs through September 30 -- a surplus that proponents of a tax cut say could be used to pay for it. Emanuel But Emanuel said the White House believes that no decisions about what to do with the surplus should be made until a surplus actually materializes. "Washington should not return to its bad habits of spending money it doesn't have," he said. "That's what got us into trouble in the first place in the 1980s." In addition to tax cuts, a number of Republicans, including House Majority Leader Dick Armey and 1996 presidential candidate Steve Forbes, have also proposed so-called "flat tax" plans that would radically alter the income tax system. Others want to replace income tax entirely with a national sales tax. Even Democratic House Minority Leader Dick Gephardt has a modified "flat tax" plan that would simplify the system and reduce tax rates for middle and lower income taxpayers. But Sunday, Emanuel made it clear the White House wasn't looking to make any such radical changes in the tax code in 1998. "We finally have gotten the deficit under wraps and lifted it off the back of the economy," he said. "We shouldn't do anything reckless or irresponsible." However, Clinton will propose new tax credits targeted toward helping middle-class families pay for child care, Emanuel said. Reuters contributed to this report. Advertise on AllPolitics. Click here for info. Come see the cures of tomorrow Congressional Quarterly Search the Web with InfoSeek Barnes & Noble book search _________________________________________________________________ home | news | in-depth | analysis | what's new | community | contents | search _________________________________________________________________ Click here for technical help or to send us feedback. Copyright © 1997 AllPolitics All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this information is provided to you.

1 0

http:--www.cnn.com-US-9712-28-briefs.pm-britain.getty.ap-
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

CNN logo Navigation COMMUNITY Message Boards Chat Feedback SITE SOURCES Contents Help! Search CNN Networks SPECIALS Quick News Almanac Video Vault News Quiz Infoseek/Big Yellow Pathfinder/Warner Bros Barnes and Noble Year In Review Main banner Click here for TIME daily rule JOHN PAUL GETTY II NOW A BRITISH CITIZEN December 28, 1997 Web posted at: 9:58 p.m. EST (0258 GMT) LONDON (AP) -- American billionaire John Paul Getty II is an American no longer. The London Sunday Telegraph says the philanthropist has become a British citizen and revoked his U.S. citizenship. Sources in the British government confirm the move. Getty is 65 and has lived in Britain for 25 years. During that time, he's become one of the country's major benefactors. In 1986, he even received an honorary knighthood from Queen Elizabeth II. The Forbes magazine list of the 400 richest Americans estimates Getty's fortune at $1 billion. _________________________________________________________________ Infoseek search ____________________ ____ ____ _________________________________________________________________ rule Message Boards Sound off on our message boards & chat [INLINE] Click here for TIME daily rule To the top © 1997 Cable News Network, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you.

2 1

Guns: H&K, G3, 7.62 v 5.56 [Guns]
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hi, I finaly got around to doing some research on Tim's claim regarding H&K's G3 being a 5.56 round while the various folks I have been talking to refer to it as a 7.62. Tim's claim that the 7.62 (.308) is actualy the HK-91/G1 and not the G3 is correct. The confusion comes from the fact that a few years ago the German Bundswehr quit using the HK and began using the FN/G3 which is 7.62. I had assumed the G3 it was refering to was the H&K and when I talked to the local gun nut he thought I was talking about the current model because I had made a comment a while back about it being used by the Germans as their standard infantry model and being .308. So, H&K 91/G1 is 7.62 (.308) (old standard issue) H&K 93/G3 is 5.56 (.223) FN/G3 is 7.62 (.308) (current standard issue) My suggested rifle *is* the H&K 91/G1 which is .308 and the local gun shop says used they run in the $1500 to $3000 range. New ones aren't imported. ____________________________________________________________________ | | | Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make | | violent revolution inevitable. | | | | John F. Kennedy | | | | | | _____ The Armadillo Group | | ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA | | /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ | | .', |||| `/( e\ | | -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate | | ravage(a)ssz.com | | 512-451-7087 | |____________________________________________________________________|

2 1

No Subject
by Anonymous 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Timmy May's reheated, refurbished, and regurgitated cud is completely inappropriate for the mailing lists into which it is cross-ruminated. ( )( )________ Timmy May /00 \ _ O_\\--mm---mm /_______)

2 1

need a life Style Change ?
by reality＠kcsmarketing.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

This Message was Composed using Extractor Pro Bulk E- Mail Software. If you wish to be removed from this advertiser's future mailings, please reply with the subject "Remove" and this software will automatically block you from their future mailings. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// You now have the opportunity to join the most extraordinary and most powerful wealth building program in the world ! Because of your desire to succeed, you have been given the opportunity to take a close look at this program. If you're skeptical that's okay. Just make the call and see for yourself. My job is to inform you, your job is to make your own decision. If You Didn't Make $200,000 Last Year... You Owe it to Yourself and Your Family to give Our Program Serious Consideration ! Also, when you start making this kind of money within weeks, you will actually learn how you can preserve it and strategically invest it ! I invite you to call me for more details, at 1-888-839-4318 this is a free 2 minute recording, so call right now !

1 0

Your New Merchant Account is Waiting
by kb1LGeasG＠206.165.6.202 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Your New Merchant Account is HERE. Accept Visa, Master Card, Discover and American Express within the next 10 days. Get INSTANT CREDIBILITY and make it easier for your customer to buy what you're selling ! Get all the information 1-800-601-2612 We've cut out all the RED TAPE !!! > No "Tell us How You Do Your Business" Questions >>> No Financial Statements >>>>> No Tax Returns >>>>>>> No Trade References >>>>>>>>> No Photos of Your Office And NONE of the other BALONEY that most businesses, especially mail order, internet , and new businesses ALWAYS have to go through. Maybe You Have > A Mail Order Business >>> An Internet Business >>>>> A Home Based Business >>>>>>> No Past Financial Statements >>>>>>>>> A New Business >>>>>>>>>>> Past Credit Problems >>>>>>>>>>>>> Already Been Told NO We use a 1 page Super Simple Approval Sheet that a 6 year old could fill out in 5 minutes. You see, We are large enough that We actually Approve the account ourselves... Your application doesn't get submitted to some faceless Bank like it does with literally all other Merchant Account Providers. Because of our financial strength we are authorized to APPROVE the account in our offices and we do !!! Then we GUARANTEE it to the Bank. (THEY CAN'T LOSE...THEY LIKE THAT) WE PUT THROUGH 99.9% OF EVERYONE WHO APPLIES ! But you have to have DEEP pockets to operate this way and we do. That's how we can offer such a fantastic program. We have been doing this so long we know that most folks who come ot us are just honest, hard working business people and we never have a problem. So we designed this program just for YOU. >>Process orders right from your PC >>>Funds wired directly to your Personal or Business Bank Account FAST! FAST! FAST! >>>>Very Competitive Rates, Great 24 hour Service, We are the Largest Provider of Merchant Accounts for Home Based and New Businesses on the Internet Today. We did over 2 billion in transactions last year and we want to double that in '98 !! To do that we have used our size and financial clout to get you the fastest mos >>>USER FRIENDLY<<<< Program ever offered ! If you are ready to do a lot more business (anyone who accepts credit cards does...) Then We want to work with YOU Call right Now to get all the information and get started. You will soon be accepting Credit Cards in your business and be making MORE MONEY ! Better order more product... >>>>>>>>>>>You're gonna need it !!! Call 1-800-601-2612 Today.

1 0

Re: constitution.amendmentxi.html (fwd)
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Forwarded message: > From: "William H. Geiger III" <whgiii(a)invweb.net> > Date: Mon, 29 Dec 97 08:32:34 -0600 > Subject: Re: constitution.amendmentxi.html (fwd) > >Of note is that this amendment *only* covers cases where a citizen sues a > >*single* state, not 49 of them. > > >There is no Constitutional rule that covers the process between a > >individual and more than a single state. It simply ain't there. > > Well considering that the Constitution is a *limiting* document, if the > powers are not explicitly given to the Federal Government they don't have > them. > > Soooo, in the case of a citizen sues multiple states the Federal > Government still has no juristiction as they have never explicitly been > given that power. So what you are saying, though I doubt you realize it, is that a citizen *can't* sue 2 or more states as a group. They *must* sue singly and in the individual state courts. Of course, this isn't explicity described either, so where does this authority come from? This means there is no way to sue states as a group for their actions in regards to relations to the federal government. So the federal government can require the states to do all kinds of things and I as a citizen and effected by those actions can't sue the states but only the federal government. Interesting hole. I wonder if it will hold up. ____________________________________________________________________ | | | Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make | | violent revolution inevitable. | | | | John F. Kennedy | | | | | | _____ The Armadillo Group | | ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA | | /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ | | .', |||| `/( e\ | | -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate | | ravage(a)ssz.com | | 512-451-7087 | |____________________________________________________________________|

2 1

List of reliable remailers
by Raph Levien 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I operate a remailer pinging service which collects detailed information about remailer features and reliability. To use it, just finger remailer-list(a)kiwi.cs.berkeley.edu There is also a Web version of the same information, plus lots of interesting links to remailer-related resources, at: http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~raph/remailer-list.html This information is used by premail, a remailer chaining and PGP encrypting client for outgoing mail. For more information, see: http://www.c2.org/~raph/premail.html For the PGP public keys of the remailers, finger pgpkeys(a)kiwi.cs.berkeley.edu This is the current info: REMAILER LIST This is an automatically generated listing of remailers. The first part of the listing shows the remailers along with configuration options and special features for each of the remailers. The second part shows the 12-day history, and average latency and uptime for each remailer. You can also get this list by fingering remailer-list(a)kiwi.cs.berkeley.edu. $remailer{'cyber'} = '<alias(a)alias.cyberpass.net> alpha pgp'; $remailer{"mix"} = "<mixmaster(a)remail.obscura.com> cpunk mix pgp hash latent cut ek ksub reord ?"; $remailer{"replay"} = "<remailer(a)replay.com> cpunk mix pgp hash latent cut post ek"; $remailer{"jam"} = "<remailer(a)cypherpunks.ca> cpunk mix pgp hash middle latent cut ek"; $remailer{"winsock"} = "<winsock(a)rigel.cyberpass.net> cpunk pgp pgponly hash cut ksub reord ?"; $remailer{'nym'} = '<config(a)nym.alias.net> newnym pgp'; $remailer{"squirrel"} = "<mix(a)squirrel.owl.de> cpunk mix pgp pgponly hash latent cut ek"; $remailer{'weasel'} = '<config(a)weasel.owl.de> newnym pgp'; $remailer{"reno"} = "<middleman(a)cyberpass.net> cpunk mix pgp hash middle latent cut ek reord ?"; $remailer{"cracker"} = "<remailer(a)anon.efga.org> cpunk mix remix pgp hash ksub esub latent cut ek reord post"; $remailer{'redneck'} = '<config(a)anon.efga.org> newnym pgp'; $remailer{"bureau42"} = "<remailer(a)bureau42.ml.org> cpunk mix pgp ksub hash latent cut ek"; $remailer{"neva"} = "<remailer(a)neva.org> cpunk pgp pgponly hash cut ksub ?"; $remailer{"lcs"} = "<mix(a)anon.lcs.mit.edu> mix"; $remailer{"medusa"} = "<medusa(a)weasel.owl.de> mix middle" $remailer{"McCain"} = "<mccain(a)notatla.demon.co.uk> mix middle"; $remailer{"valdeez"} = "<valdeez(a)juno.com> cpunk pgp pgponly hash ek"; $remailer{"arrid"} = "<arrid(a)juno.com> cpunk pgp pgponly hash ek"; $remailer{"hera"} = "<goddesshera(a)juno.com> cpunk pgp pgponly hash ek"; $remailer{"htuttle"} = "<h_tuttle(a)rigel.cyberpass.net> cpunk pgp hash latent cut post ek"; catalyst(a)netcom.com is _not_ a remailer. lmccarth(a)ducie.cs.umass.edu is _not_ a remailer. usura(a)replay.com is _not_ a remailer. remailer(a)crynwr.com is _not_ a remailer. There is no remailer at relay.com. Groups of remailers sharing a machine or operator: (cyber mix reno winsock) (weasel squirrel medusa) (cracker redneck) (nym lcs) (valdeez arrid hera) This remailer list is somewhat phooey. Go check out http://www.publius.net/rlist.html for a good one. Last update: Thu 23 Oct 97 15:48:06 PDT remailer email address history latency uptime ----------------------------------------------------------------------- hera goddesshera(a)juno.com ------------ 5:03:45 99.86% nym config(a)nym.alias.net +*#**#**### :34 95.82% redneck config(a)anon.efga.org #*##*+#**** 2:00 95.44% mix mixmaster(a)remail.obscura.com +++ ++++++* 19:18 95.27% squirrel mix(a)squirrel.owl.de -- ---+--- 2:34:19 95.16% cyber alias(a)alias.cyberpass.net *++***+ ++ 11:26 95.11% replay remailer(a)replay.com **** *** 10:06 94.93% arrid arrid(a)juno.com ----.------ 8:50:34 94.41% bureau42 remailer(a)bureau42.ml.org --------- 3:38:29 93.53% cracker remailer(a)anon.efga.org + +*+*+*+ 16:32 92.80% jam remailer(a)cypherpunks.ca + +*-++++ 24:14 92.79% winsock winsock(a)rigel.cyberpass.net -..-..---- 9:59:18 92.22% neva remailer(a)neva.org ------****+ 1:03:02 90.39% valdeez valdeez(a)juno.com 4:58:22 -36.97% reno middleman(a)cyberpass.net 1:01:28 -2.65% History key * # response in less than 5 minutes. * * response in less than 1 hour. * + response in less than 4 hours. * - response in less than 24 hours. * . response in more than 1 day. * _ response came back too late (more than 2 days). cpunk A major class of remailers. Supports Request-Remailing-To: field. eric A variant of the cpunk style. Uses Anon-Send-To: instead. penet The third class of remailers (at least for right now). Uses X-Anon-To: in the header. pgp Remailer supports encryption with PGP. A period after the keyword means that the short name, rather than the full email address, should be used as the encryption key ID. hash Supports ## pasting, so anything can be put into the headers of outgoing messages. ksub Remailer always kills subject header, even in non-pgp mode. nsub Remailer always preserves subject header, even in pgp mode. latent Supports Matt Ghio's Latent-Time: option. cut Supports Matt Ghio's Cutmarks: option. post Post to Usenet using Post-To: or Anon-Post-To: header. ek Encrypt responses in reply blocks using Encrypt-Key: header. special Accepts only pgp encrypted messages. mix Can accept messages in Mixmaster format. reord Attempts to foil traffic analysis by reordering messages. Note: I'm relying on the word of the remailer operator here, and haven't verified the reord info myself. mon Remailer has been known to monitor contents of private email. filter Remailer has been known to filter messages based on content. If not listed in conjunction with mon, then only messages destined for public forums are subject to filtering. Raph Levien

1 0

Right to sue multiple states...
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

ARTICLE III. Section 2. The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority; [deleted text] between Citizens of different States; [deleted text] Clearly my suing say the govenor and legislature of each of the 50 states qualifies as a case involving citizens of different states and therefore there is clearly a right to sue multiple states at the federal level and falls under the responsibility of the Supreme Court. ____________________________________________________________________ | | | Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make | | violent revolution inevitable. | | | | John F. Kennedy | | | | | | _____ The Armadillo Group | | ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA | | /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ | | .', |||| `/( e\ | | -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate | | ravage(a)ssz.com | | 512-451-7087 | |____________________________________________________________________|

2 1

Vulis again
by Information Security 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> Date: Mon, 29 Dec 1997 07:18:08 -0500 > Message-ID: <031ce308b9b0af69c83a11320732d575(a)anon.efga.org> > From: Anonymous <anon(a)anon.efga.org> > > Timmy May's reheated, refurbished, and > regurgitated cud is completely > inappropriate for the mailing lists into > which it is cross-ruminated. > > ( )( )________ Timmy May > /00 \ _ > O_\\--mm---mm /_______) I see you are still sending ascii-art decorated sweet little nothings to the people you love... ---guy Medication refill time, Dimitry.

1 0

Successful Subscription
by eureka-help＠eureka.abc-web.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

WELCOME TO EUREKA! ================== Congratulations, your free subscription to the Eureka! newsletter is now set up. We hope you enjoy every copy. As promised, while you wait for your first newsletter here are the links to the FREE videos and FREE photos! FREE hardcore videos ........... http://207.168.184.26/ FREE hardcore photos .... http://209.50.232.36/desires/ - Eureka! *FREE porn in your email!*

1 0

Re: constitution.amendmentxi.html (fwd)
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Forwarded message: > From: "William H. Geiger III" <whgiii(a)invweb.net> > Date: Mon, 29 Dec 97 09:17:55 -0600 > Subject: Re: constitution.amendmentxi.html (fwd) > Well you can only sue the state that has caused some form of direct damage > against you. Really? Where is that in the Constitution? I can't sue a state or the federal government on an issue of process or procedure unless I *personaly* have been effected? Malarky. The simple fact that I am a citizen that *could* be effected is sufficient grounds to file. Especialy considering the detailing of authority in the 10th. If this were so I would not be able to file against a law regulating, for example, a religion unless I happen to be a participant of that religion. This is clearly not constitutional since any law threating a single religion by extension can and does threaten all religious freedom in the country. > If both Texas and Alaska are doing somthing Unconstitutional > but Texas is the only one who has directly caused damage then you should > only be able to sue Texas. Why? If both states are participating in an illegal action - such as complying with unconstitutional federal regulations - then even a single state in which I *don't* reside nor have *ever* been in is a clear threat to my constitutional rights. Remember the feds are *required* to guarantee a constitutional government in *all* states and that all priviliges and immunitites be recognized by those states - irrespective of my current geographic location. Now if we accept the argument that the 14th extends my federal rights to the states then the wrongful action and its application is even more clearly relevant. However, the 14th is not necessary for this to be the case. (thankfuly, since one of my claims is that rights are not equivalent to priviliges or immunities) It is the precedence and not the personal application that is unconstitutional. > I think that in the majority of > cases one will find that a greviance will be limited to a single state (I > think it would be very rare to find a case where all 50 states had > directly caused damage against an individule). - Illegal taxation and the compliance of the states in turning over money illegaly - regulation and prohibition of firearms and the states complicancy in breaking the 2nd. - the provisioning and support of military operations relating to the Army and Air Force (which is unconstitutional unless part of the Army or Navy) for more than 2 year terms. - the failure of the US govt. to train and arm the militia in the several states - the various federal regulations limiting consensual crimes contrary to the letter and spirit of the 9th and 10th. - the abrogation of the states duties as equals to the federal govt. and their duties as a part of the checks and balances of the Constitution. And as a matter of course most other issues resting on Constitutional jurisdiction involving the willing compliance of state government. > An example of this would be back in the 50's with the forced segregation > laws. If you were living in Georga and wished to bring suit against the > state for violating your rights you would be limited to only suing Georga > even though AL,FL,SC,NC,TX,AR, all had the same laws on the books. Nobody that I can find has *ever* even tried to do this so how can it be undoable? It's a pity there wasn't some young turk back then to give it a shot - course there doesn't seem to be any young turks now willing to do it either...;( Now, if I can figure a way around the Supreme Courts 3 year requirement... ____________________________________________________________________ | | | Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make | | violent revolution inevitable. | | | | John F. Kennedy | | | | | | _____ The Armadillo Group | | ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA | | /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ | | .', |||| `/( e\ | | -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate | | ravage(a)ssz.com | | 512-451-7087 | |____________________________________________________________________|

2 1

Re: Right to sue multiple states... (fwd)
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Forwarded message: > From: "William H. Geiger III" <whgiii(a)invweb.net> > Date: Mon, 29 Dec 97 09:39:29 -0600 > Subject: Re: Right to sue multiple states... > >Clearly my suing say the govenor and legislature of each of the 50 states > >qualifies as a case involving citizens of different states and therefore > >there is clearly a right to sue multiple states at the federal level and > >falls under the responsibility of the Supreme Court. > > Good point execpt are we talking of suing a States' governemnt for damages > or are we talking of suing individules, who happen to be part of a State's > government, for damages? We are talking about suing an individual for their actions in their official capacity. People sign bills not offices. People commit crimes, offices can't. > I think that it is universal that one is > precluded from suing a memeber of government for carying out the duties of > office (ie: you can't sue the Governor of Texas for passing a law you > don't like while you can sue the govenor if hits your car going down the > road). I can find nothing in the Constitution that prohibits this, and since the 10th limits the feds authority by extension it is permissible. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ARTICLE III. Section 1. The judicial Power of the United States, shall be invested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. Section 2. The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority; -- to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls; In all Cases, affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Clearly the Constitution allows charges against individuals for their actions while in office. Otherwise how would anyone be impeached? The person holding an office is responsible for all actions of that office and are in fact *personaly* responsible for those actions. ____________________________________________________________________ | | | Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make | | violent revolution inevitable. | | | | John F. Kennedy | | | | | | _____ The Armadillo Group | | ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA | | /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ | | .', |||| `/( e\ | | -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate | | ravage(a)ssz.com | | 512-451-7087 | |____________________________________________________________________|

1 0

Eureka! Tue Dec 30 '97
by eureka＠eureka.abc-web.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Welcome to Tuesday's issue of Eureka! PLAYGAL This is truly a breathtaking site. Well-designed and easy to use with excellent content. The tour alone has hotter porn than many other 'free' sites - go see it now. It's explicit, comprehensive and top quality. There are 2,000 video feeds online, free live fucking with sound, 10,000 erotic stories, 1,000s of top quality pix, adult and arcade games, real ama- teur competitions and much more. Click now and be astounded! Playgal .... http://www.playgal.com/playgal/banner_abc1.html EUREKA! is now available in FOUR languages. So now you can choose from one or more of these following languages! FRANÇAIS ..... http://eureka.abc-web.com/eureka/francais.htm DEUTSCH ....... http://eureka.abc-web.com/eureka/deutsch.htm ESPAÑOL ....... http://eureka.abc-web.com/eureka/espanol.htm THE BABE GALLERY Go down the page about half way to the galleries. From there you have a choice of several different woman, each featuring a decent looking babe in a bunch of poses. Nice pussy shots. The Babe Gallery .......... http://www.the-babe-gallery.com/ MIDNIGHT DESIRES We have a free movie here! You'll need the vivo player. It features a terrific blowjob scene of some hot tramp sucking off her boss, or is it her office boy? Cool clip with sound! Midnight ........ http://www.midnightdesires.com/default.htm SEXTREME Wow, this site is loaded with easy to surf hot and horny pix all free for you! Foreplay, group sex, lesbians, models and a whole lot more. You might want to bookmark this one! Yeah! Sextreme .................. http://199.166.219.149/sextreme/ ABNORMALLY BIG BOOBS Well I guess so! There are some extra large hooters here to say the very least. All of the pix are listed by boob size with great thumbnails. This is a must surf for all tit fans! Abnormally Big ...... http://204.177.222.200/~paul/boobs.htm FREE STREAMING VIDEO Please note that most of these feeds require a Netscape bro- wser in order to successfully view them. Unfortunately Micr- osoft's browser does not have all the features of Netscape's yet. However, many of the feeds use the RealPlayer and will work in most browsers. If you do not have Netscape and want a free copy click here ... http://www.netscape.com/download/ Just 18 ........................ http://204.244.215.7/teens/ CHAT WITH OTHER READERS This chat is growing fast, and already there are a number of regulars you will meet most days. It's good to see Eureka! readers interacting with each other and having a great time! Just surf in and have fun! ...... http://137.39.63.229/chat/ THE BEST PHONE SEX Live Hetero 1-on-1, 2-on-1, group, dateline...1-800-644-8779 FREE Hetero live 1-on-1 (international call)...011-678-77416 FREE Gay live 1-on-1 (international call)......011-678-75629 AMATEUR SITE OF THE DAY EMERALD: Another hot Asian amateur. This young lady is a hoot, she has a wit that almost outshines her perfect body! One of her missions is to destroy the bimbo image and exp- lore her sexuality in an intelligent, funny way. She has quite a following! ......... http://amateurindex.com/eureka/ TODAY'S FREE PIX We decided to start releasing our super duper new picture collection a couple of days early - and we just know you're going to enjoy these ones. There's plenty more variety too! Pic 1 ........................... http://137.39.63.229/?300 Pic 2 ........................... http://137.39.63.229/?301 Pic 3 ........................... http://137.39.63.229/?302 Pic 4 ........................... http://137.39.63.229/?303 Pic 5 ........................... http://137.39.63.229/?304 Pic 6 ........................... http://137.39.63.229/?305 Pic 7 ........................... http://137.39.63.229/?306 Pic 8 ........................... http://137.39.63.229/?307 Pic 9 ........................... http://137.39.63.229/?308 Pic 10 ........................... http://137.39.63.229/?309 PLEASE VISIT THIS FINE EUREKA! MEMBER SITE Amazing Teen Cocksuckers http://pandobox.com Memberships include,40,000 jpg pix,over 300 live hardcore feeds, monthly interactive porn magazine, 1 gig of movies clips, 300 sexy stories and x-rated games to play offline. ------------------------------------------------------------ If you would like to unsubscribe from the Eureka! Newsletter simply select reply and send us a quick reply to this email. ------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

Re: Freedom Forum report on the State of the First Amendment (fwd)
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Forwarded message: > Date: Mon, 29 Dec 1997 17:12:06 +0100 (MET) > Subject: Re: Freedom Forum report on the State of the First Amendment > From: nobody(a)REPLAY.COM (Anonymous) > >Hmmm... > > > >Apologies. In *theory* you have those rights, on *paper*, you have those > >rights, but in *practice*, you're correct, the Government has power that > >it gleefully abuses, forcing others to comply w/ political correctness. > > Well no, on paper you do have those rights, and you don't have those > rights. Laws have been written so that you do not have those rights. > Are those laws consitutional? No. Does the fascist regime, or the > average apathetic American care? No. All it takes is a small group of individuals willing to fight the fight. Constitutional democracy is *not* mob rule. As long as you quit because nobody else will pat you on the shoulder and tell you how right you are then you aren't freedom loving. Freedom is a selfish endeavour. ____________________________________________________________________ | | | Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make | | violent revolution inevitable. | | | | John F. Kennedy | | | | | | _____ The Armadillo Group | | ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA | | /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ | | .', |||| `/( e\ | | -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate | | ravage(a)ssz.com | | 512-451-7087 | |____________________________________________________________________|

1 0

Wit Capital Update: Virtual Roadshow Service Launched
by news＠witcapital.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Wit Capital Update December 29, 1997 www.witcapital.com Member NASD/SIPC Wit Capital has launched an exciting new service that will help you learn more about the public offerings on our web site. For selected Wit Capital offerings, in connection with your review of the prospectus, you'll find "virtual roadshow" presentations available for viewing right on your PC. A roadshow is the process by which underwriters acquaint investors with the products, people and finances of the company whose stock is to be publicly offered. Traditionally, only institutional investors are invited to see these presentations, but now you can view them at the click of your mouse. To view a virtual roadshow, go to the Look at New Issues section of our web site, find the prospectus that interests you and as part of your review of the prospectus, click the button marked View Roadshow. You'll be asked to download a plug-in called RealPlayer 5.0, for which you'll see easy instructions. We encourage you to read the complete prospectus for any Wit Capital offering.

1 0

Re: Why I Support Microsoft
by Brian B. Riley 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On 12/29/97 6:47 AM, Patrick May (pjm(a)spe.com) passed this wisdom: > Okay, so I'm a UNIX-head; I forgot about the Macs (a dangerous >thing to do, given the ferocity of their supporters). If the >government were to adopt my suggestion, two major results would be: > > - The third party market for Linux software would grow rapidly > and enormously. > - The government's software budget would be reduced dramatically. that's OK, we Mac-heads have MacLinkPlus translators, we just get em to write another half dozen or so translators for Linux and Linux file system recognitions to the OS, no big deal ... we have always prided ourselves that MacOS often reads and processes Windoze documents better than WinDoze does ... Brian B. Riley --> http://members.macconnect.com/~brianbr For PGP Keys <mailto:brianbr@together.net?subject=Get%20PGP%20Key> "In effect, to follow, not to force the public inclination; to give a direction, a form, a technical dress, and a specific sanction, to the general sense of the community, is the true end of legislature." -- Edmund Burke

2 1

Sniping & such...
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hi, To address Tim's question about bolt-actions. As far as I know the Marine sniper still uses the Remington 7.62 bolt-action as his arm of choice. The beauty of the H&K blow-back mechanism is that it is very accurate at long range compared to other gas operated mechanism. However, in the situation we are discussion - taking on an assault team with snipers, aka anti-sniping, this level of accuracy is irrelevant. The goal is to stop the assault. To this end single shot accuracy is irrelevant. The reason is that we are not trying to hit a 16 in.^2 piece of brain pan and *not* hit the hostage in front. What we *are* trying to do is locate and eliminate specific targets and any ancillary hits to personnel on that end are a *good* thing. To that end I still like the H&K's because they have the 3-shot selector. My goal would be to set my IIS to show hot targets as black, with the black threshold about 90F. I would then pop off a 3-shot group into anything that looked the least bit like a person. Think of it as a .308 mini-shotgun at 600 yds. Under those conditions a 6-12 in. spread *is* a good thing. With this in mind, you would want to wear nomex to reduce your heat signature, a gillie suit for reduced visual targeting, and some sort of cool suit (from your local auto performance shop) with a modified and remote dissipator to reduce your heat signature so that *their* scopes don't show you as black. If you're in your house a good place to put the dissipator would be in the bathtub or sink. You might also want to cool-suit the gun as well. If you're in the field the dissipator should go behind and below your level of site, it's probably a good thing to cover it with dirt or debris as well. ____________________________________________________________________ | | | Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make | | violent revolution inevitable. | | | | John F. Kennedy | | | | | | _____ The Armadillo Group | | ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA | | /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ | | .', |||| `/( e\ | | -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate | | ravage(a)ssz.com | | 512-451-7087 | |____________________________________________________________________|

1 0

Re: constitution.amendmentxi.html (fwd)
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Forwarded message: > From: "William H. Geiger III" <whgiii(a)invweb.net> > Date: Mon, 29 Dec 97 10:32:02 -0600 > Subject: Re: constitution.amendmentxi.html (fwd) > No this flys in the face of 200 yrs of American laws and centuries more of > English law. If your rights have not been infringed then you can't sue. The founding fathers took care of this argument also... THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES ARTICLE VI. This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. ____________________________________________________________________ | | | Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make | | violent revolution inevitable. | | | | John F. Kennedy | | | | | | _____ The Armadillo Group | | ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA | | /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ | | .', |||| `/( e\ | | -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate | | ravage(a)ssz.com | | 512-451-7087 | |____________________________________________________________________|

2 1