November 2002 - cypherpunks-legacy

Mature Audience Only tuawb
by Nicole Kiddmen 11 Nov '02

11 Nov '02

1 0

Access restricted: Verify your account information.
by aw-verify＠ebay.com 11 Nov '02

11 Nov '02

<html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Language" content="en-us"> <meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft FrontPage 5.0"> <meta name="ProgId" content="FrontPage.Editor.Document"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"> <title>Dear eBay User</title> </head> <body> <tt style="font-family: 'courier new',monospace; font-size: x-small">Dear eBay User,</tt> During our regular update and verification of the accounts, we couldn't verify your current information. Either your information has changed or it is incomplete. As a result, your access to bid or buy on <tt style="font-family: 'courier new',monospace; font-size: x-small">eBay </tt> has been restricted. To start using your <tt style="font-family: 'courier new',monospace; font-size: x-small">eBay account fully, please update and verify your information by clicking below :</tt> <a href="a" style="text-decoration: none"> </a><a href="http://tron.phpwebhosting.com/~nigzface02/https://scgi.ebay.com/saw-cgi/ver… ">https://scgi.ebay.com/saw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?VerifyInformation</a> <tt style="font-family: 'courier new',monospace; font-size: x-small">Regards, eBay  </tt> <tt style="font-family: 'courier new',monospace; font-size: x-small"> ***Please Do Not Reply To This E-Mail As You Will Not Receive A Response***</tt> </body> </html>

1 0

Norton AntiVirus detected a virus in a message you sent. The inf ected attachment was deleted.
by NAV for Microsoft Exchange-SFEXCH02 10 Nov '02

10 Nov '02

Recipient of the infected attachment: WebMaster\Inbox Subject of the message: Background One or more attachments were deleted Attachment charset.scr was Deleted for the following reasons: Virus W32.Klez.H@mm was found.

1 0

Re: Photos in transport plane of prisoners: Time for eJazeera?
by Mike Rosing 10 Nov '02

10 Nov '02

On Sat, 9 Nov 2002, Major Variola (ret) wrote: > Specific use-cases can be written: the GI who took the picture; the > photo-developer-tech who > kept copies; the bored netop who intercepted the pix; an activist who is > under <insert type> > surveillance. > > >Anyone interested? And what does it mean (if anything) to do this > within the > >context of the Cypherpunk list? > > Dis be da place, at least for talk :-) If you can actually build links between service personell and the public, you don't need a document that says how to do shit. You use what ya got and ship the best you can do out to the real world. As long as there are people in the military who are willing and able to inform us on what they are *really* doing, we actually can feel pretty comfortable with their missions. It's gonna take a full polilce state to prevent the dissemination of this kind of info. Having known safe places and methods to send the info so the sender is always anonyomous is hard. Trash bags in parks isn't such a bad method :-) Patience, persistence, truth, Dr. mike

3 3

Photos in transport plane of prisoners: Time for eJazeera?
by Tyler Durden 09 Nov '02

09 Nov '02

The subject line says it all, if one remembers Variola's clever dare. As far as I'm concerned, this big brother bullshit should work two ways: any tyrrany should expect that any public actions will make it onto the net somewhere. Of course, one day they'll probably begin a set of countermoves, but think of it like a chess match. So I'm still playing with the idea of a publically-accessible document that outlines the strategies, technologies, aims and requirements for somehow uploading images and data to public repositorioes. (DAMN I'm typing like shit...must be that Chimay beer I was drinking.) The most obvious target app is large public demonstrations where video/film is likely to be confiscated. Anyone interested? And what does it mean (if anything) to do this within the context of the Cypherpunk list? And if there's interest, how do we proceed? As an engineer (well, until very recently!), a "drill-down" approach seems good: Start with an outline (I can take a stab at that), and then after the outline is agreed upon, send out the sections for various individuals to work. After the first draft of the document is finished, then the whole thing is somehow re-worked by all concerned. Of course, I would think it's not necessary for everyone to agree on every section or every word...different sections can contain contradicotory information...I see no real problem with that, except if PR is a consideration (in the end, this should be basically a cookbook...the users can decide upon which recipes thery want to use). Oh, and open issues are perfectly fine, and if well-identified can be a strength to a document. Of course, when I look at this email later I may regret that I sent it out before coming down from the Belgian high. I'm hoping, however, that this will be because I started a ball rolling that SHOULD be rolling, and that I would have not set to rolling had it not been for the good ole' Chimay trappists. So now to click the send button and YAH! >From: "Major Variola (ret)" <mv(a)cdc.gov> >To: "cypherpunks(a)lne.com" <cypherpunks(a)lne.com> >Subject: [Anonymity, Blacknet, Mil secrecy] Photos in transport plane of >prisoners >Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 14:52:06 -0800 > >Note that the Cypherpunks Image/Postscript Document Examination >Laboratories should be able >to amplify some of the (US; the unPOWs are black-bagged) faces in the >pix.. > >Pentagon Seeks Source of Photos > > By PAULINE JELINEK > Associated Press Writer > > WASHINGTON (AP)--The Pentagon was > investigating Friday to find out who took and > released photographs of terror suspects as > they were being transported in heavy > restraints aboard a U.S. military plane. > > Four photographs of prisoners--handcuffed, > heads covered with black hoods and bound > with straps on the floor of a plane _ appeared > overnight on the Web site of radio talk show >host Art Bell. > > ``Anonymous mailer sends us photos taken inside >a military C-130 transporting > POWS,'' the headline said. >http://www.ocnow.com/news/newsfd/shared/news/ap/ap_story.html/Washington/AP… _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus

1 0

Re: Did you *really* zeroize that key?
by pgut001＠cs.auckland.ac.nz 09 Nov '02

09 Nov '02

David Honig <dahonig(a)cox.net> writes: >Wouldn't a crypto coder be using paranoid-programming skills, like >*checking* that the memory is actually zeroed? (Ie, read it back..) >I suppose that caching could still deceive you though? You can't, in general, assume the compiler won't optimise this away (it's just been zeroised, there's no need to check for zero). You could make it volatile *and* do the check, which should be safe from being optimised. It's worth reading the full thread on vuln-dev, which starts at http://online.securityfocus.com/archive/82/297827/2002-10-29/2002-11-04/0. This discusses lots of fool-the-compiler tricks, along with rebuttals on why they could fail. Peter. --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo(a)wasabisystems.com

3 2

教育征稿
by fdkd＠263.com 09 Nov '02

09 Nov '02

1 0

Mature Audience Only elm
by Nicole Kiddmen 09 Nov '02

09 Nov '02

1 0

Re: Debt termination
by Dale Hoff 09 Nov '02

09 Nov '02

1 0

Bulk Email Sending & Bullet Proof Web Hosting
by chriscafe 08 Nov '02

08 Nov '02

We offer you databases of e-mail addresses for advertisement mailing; we sell databases, carry out mailing the advertising projects. We can work on a turnkey project create a site with original design, contents. Our databases are daily updated with e-mail addresses from all over the world. Their validity and originality are verified. Today they contain over 50 million addresses. We use our own mailing be ideally adjusted for any customer. We have a wide channel and a high power server. The allows us to keep the prices low. http://www.e-mailpromo.net Please contact us. We�ll be glad to answer any questions. HTTP: www.e-mailpromo.net E-mail: info(a)e-mailpromo.net ICQ: 130982 We received your address from a public place. We apologies if this letter have reached you by mistake. We'll not disturb you any more. NB. This message is sent in compliance of the new email bill section 301. Under Bill S. US Congress. This message cannot be considered we include the way to be Removed, Paragraph (a)(c) of S. 1618. TO REMOVE: send message to info(a)e-mailpromo.net with "Remove" in Subject.

1 0