January 2002 - cypherpunks-legacy

AU Anti-biker Laws
by mattd 10 Jan '02

10 Jan '02

>>I vaguely remember a door-strengthening prohibition somewhere in Europe being mentioned here in the past.<< At least in one part of Europe fortifications are going up with local council approval.In checko the 1st ghetto wall since ww2 was recently built to enforce a curfew in a romany section of an old town. Also in au the authoritarians in port Augusta have proposed a curfew for young people. "spewing nemesis" (?) Only for dumbshit anarcho-crapitalists.The issue is not that "allowing" it is good, but that "banning" it would require drastic and draconian enforcement measures.) We are nearly always 5-10 years behind youse.

1 0

Prosperity through punishment (was Re: more on procmail is not mattd's friend!)
by mattd 10 Jan '02

10 Jan '02

>>"For a very long time in economics and biology there's been an assumption of self-interest," says economist Herbert Gintis of the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Instead, he says, it seems that egalitarianism is "a basic part of human behaviour".<< Interesting Quote but Heresy here in anarcho-crapitalist cloud cuckoo land. (nomen,nowomen,nobrains,noguts,noballs,nomen.) "I'm not a believer in Anarchy because I believe that people will behave better without government than with, I'm a believer in Anarchy because then they can't hide behind lawyers and badges when they fuck someone. They can still hide behind guns, but that just makes their actions more honest. I don't believe in anarchy because I trust people. I believe in anarchy because I don't trust them."

1 0

Prosperity through punishment (was Re: more on procmail is not mattd's friend!)
by faustine.＠hushmail.com 10 Jan '02

10 Jan '02

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- R. A. Hettinga quoted: >The fear of being fined keeps potential defectors in line, and the power to >punish gives willing cooperators a sense of security. ... > "For a very long time in economics and biology there's been >an assumption of self-interest," says economist Herbert Gintis of the >University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Instead, he says, it seems that >egalitarianism is "a basic part of human behaviour". Does anyone here actually think of this as good thing? At first glance, one wouldn't assume so--but after seeing the zeal with which some of you bond over shitting on people who have views different from what somehow mysteriously passes for "acceptable", I started wondering if maybe you take this finding as some sort of positive sign of what people can "achieve" through voluntary cooperation without the heavy hand of government, etc. I find it literally nauseating. And as I was reading it, I couldn't help remembering a passage from Zarathustra which bears repeating. Once you turn an ice-cold eye toward yourself, this work becomes a lot more meaningful than just another way to sneer at the sheeple... ~F. *** Alas! There cometh the time when man will no longer give birth to any star. Alas! There cometh the time of the most despicable man, who can no longer despise himself. Lo! I show you the last man. "What is love? What is creation? What is longing? What is a star?"-- so asketh the last man and blinketh. The earth hath then become small, and on it there hoppeth the last man who maketh everything small. His species is ineradicable like that of the ground-flea; the last man liveth longest. "We have discovered happiness"-- say the last men, and blink thereby. They have left the regions where it is hard to live; for they need warmth. One still loveth one's neighbour and rubbeth against him; for one needeth warmth. Turning ill and being distrustful, they consider sinful: they walk warily. He is a fool who still stumbleth over stones or men! A little poison now and then: that maketh pleasant dreams. And much poison at last for a pleasant death. One still worketh, for work is a pastime. But one is careful lest the pastime should hurt one. One no longer becometh poor or rich; both are too burdensome. Who still wanteth to rule? Who still wanteth to obey? Both are too burdensome. No shepherd, and one herd! Everyone wanteth the same; everyone is equal: he who hath other sentiments goeth voluntarily into the madhouse. "Formerly all the world was insane,"-- say the subtlest of them, and blink thereby. They are clever and know all that hath happened: so there is no end to their raillery. People still fall out, but are soon reconciled--otherwise it spoileth their stomachs. They have their little pleasures for the day, and their little pleasures for the night, but they have a regard for health. "We have discovered happiness,"--say the last men, and blink thereby. And here ended the first discourse of Zarathustra, which is also called "The Prologue", for at this point the shouting and mirth of the multitude interrupted him. "Give us this last man, O Zarathustra,"-- they called out-- "make us into these last men! Then will we make thee a present of the Superman!" And all the people exulted and smacked their lips. Zarathustra, however, turned sad, and said to his heart: They understand me not: I am not the mouth for these ears. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: Hush 2.1 Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com wl4EARECAB4FAjw+MWUXHGZhdXN0aW5lLkBodXNobWFpbC5jb20ACgkQGwpHwwWoj8Wa +gCfTC5hyoxtc8fl80yDrMhJEdUwptgAniCnYxT8jMEh1g+tgGIa4YO8fWLu =sR/h -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

Johansen charged in Norway
by Major Variola (ret) 10 Jan '02

10 Jan '02

http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGAM2Y25BWC.html Norwegian Hacker Indicted for Breaking Hollywood DVD Code By Doug MellgrenAssociated Press Writer Published: Jan 10, 2002 OSLO, Norway (AP) - Prosecutors filed criminal charges Thursday against a Norwegian teen-ager who drew Hollywood's anger by writing and distributing a program that unlocks copy-protected DVDs. After a two-year investigation, authorities indicted Jon Lech Johansen in an important test of Norway's new computer crime laws. Johansen's defenders call the prosecution a wrongheaded attack on intellectual freedom. Creating software that breaks copy-protection schemes, they argue, is not the same as using such programs to steal copyright material. Johansen, who was 15 when he authored the software, has said he did so because only wanted to be able to play movies on his computer. "Software that Jon wrote is something that is necessary for people to be able to exercise their...rights with a DVD," said Robin Gross of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which has provided Johansen's legal defense. Johansen, now 18 and a household name as DVD-Jon in Norway, became a celebrity among computer hackers, who even marched to support him in New York, where a related civil trial was held. Norway's economic crime police declined to charge Johansen under the country's copyright laws. Rather, prosecutors are using a law that prohibits data break-ins. "We want to focus on the code-breaking part of it, and that he made a copy of something that he did not pay for," said Inger Marie Sunde, an attorney with the Norwegian police unit. The investigation grew out of complaints filed by the Motion Picture Association of America, which represents the major Hollywood studios. Sunde said authorities agreed with the studios' contention that Johansen's program unlocked their property and left it open for theft. Sunde said it was the first such case in Norway. She did not know when the trial would begin but said it would probably be sometime this year. If convicted, Johansen could face up to two years in prison and claims for compensation. Gross, of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said the law in question is designed to prevent break-ins of secured systems like banks. In this case, she said, Johansen was trying to access his own property - a DVD he lawfully purchased. Johansen could not immediately be reached for comment. Repeated efforts to call his home and mobile numbers produced busy signals. Movie industry officials applauded the indictment and expressed confidence that "Norwegian law will provide a fair and just result." DVDs are gaining fast in popularity and rapidly becoming the preferred media for movie sales. They hold up to seven times more data than CDs and, because they are digital, don't lose quality when copied. The movie industry had attempted to protect films recorded to DVDs with the Content Scrambling System, usually called CSS. Johansen's DeCSS program unlocks the discs, opening them for copying and playing. Though Johansen has said he was trying to watch DVDs on a Linux-based computer, which did not already have DVD software like Windows and Macintosh systems, the program also permits reproduction of DVDs and their circulation over the Internet. Such free distribution could cost the movie industry millions of dollars a year, it argues. According to the indictment, more than 5,000 copies of the DeCSS program were downloaded from the Internet in the first three months after it was posted. It can still be found on the Internet. The DeCSS program has been the subject of at least three lawsuits in the United States. In November, a federal appeals court in New York sided with Hollywood and rejected free-speech claims from Eric Corley, who had posted links to the program on his Web site. A similar case is pending in Connecticut. A California appeals court, however, sided with a man who posted DeCSS on his site. The DVD Copy Control Association, which licenses the DVD scrambling system, considered the posting a breach of trade secrets and is appealing to the state Supreme Court. --- "Stick a fork in their ass and turn them over... they're done"

1 0

Dvd Movie to CDROM!!
by CopyANyDVD342683＠mail.ru 10 Jan '02

10 Jan '02

1 0

I just uploaded my web cam pics!��x15904
by Dbaez261589＠uxb.com 10 Jan '02

10 Jan '02

Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by (Dbaez261589(a)uxb.com) on Thursday, January 10, 2002 at 15:28:48 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- message: I Just uploaded my web cam pics, 100% free and no download. Uncensored and HOT!http://www.envy.nu/hotcamzhere/<BR><BR><BR>j6w2z ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

[Anti_Immigration] Jewish Left vs Christian Right & Immigration Policy in America (fwd)
by Jei 10 Jan '02

10 Jan '02

---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 13:50:09 EST From: Glenn0110(a)aol.com Reply-To: Anti_Immigration(a)yahoogroups.com To: anti_immigration(a)yahoogroups.com Subject: [Anti_Immigration] Jewish Left vs Christian Right & Immigration Policy in America [Below is a discussion between Nissan who is a right-wing Israeli Jew and Bob from Michigan who is a Right-wing Christian that I found at http://www.lubbockonline.com/ubb/Forum35/HTML/000097.html - THIS IS A MUST READ.] Dear Nissan & BCC friends, What is the definition of hypocrisy? Advocating one set of rules for yourself and another set of rules for others? Jews in Israel oppose multi-culturalism but Jews in America are forcing multi-culturalism on WASP America. Jews in Israel are very strict about who can immigrate to Israel, but Jews in America have forced an immigration policy upon our nation that is 90% non-white and 95% non-Christian. [Side Bar: For more information about Jewish influence upon American Immigration policy go read "The Jewish Stake in America's Changing Demography, Reconsidering a Misguided Immigration Policy," By Stephen Steinlight at http://www.cis.org/articles/2001/back1301.html - It is written by a Jew who was formerly pro-immigration and he explains why most Jews are pro-immigration. He talks about the immense and formidable Jewish political power in America. He talks about Jewish control of Hollywood and the news media. He talks about Jewish Supremacism inculcated in young Jewish Americans. He talks about how Jews have divided loyalties and how they often put the interests of Israel ahead of American interests. He talks about the intentional program of the Internationalists to make White's a minority in America in the near future via unlimited immigration and open borders policies. He talks about the Jewish affinity for Marxism. He talks about the Jewish drive for remaking America into a pluralistic and secular society. He explains that MTV is a tool of indoctrination which is being used to promote a radical agenda that includes multi-racialism. You must read this article and pass it on. There are a growing number of Jews who are coming around to conservatism, I just hope they come around sooner rather than later.] Jews in America control and finance strongly anti-Christian groups like the ACLU, People for the American Way (PAW), Americans United for Separation of Church and State and many other such groups. This is anti-Christian bigotry. But most Jews (like you?) are only concerned about one kind of bigotry, "anti-semitism." You are completely oblivious to the anti-Christian bigotry of your fellow Jews. That is hypocrisy my friend and I am damned angry about it. It is OK for Jewish Hollywood to attack my values and beliefs in nearly EVERY DAMN MOVIE THEY MAKE IN JEWISH HOLLYWOOD, but you Jews can't stop whining about my supposed "anti-semitism." You have a double standard my friend. On the one hand you support the idea that Israel should be a nation that enshrines support for Judaism in its legal code, but on the other hand you do not think America should be a Christian nation with support for Christianity written into our legal code. Jews in America think that America should be a secular nation. I am telling you the truth when I say, I love Jews. I love the real Jews who love Moses, love the Torah, are pro-Life, anti-Homosexual, pro-Gun, anti-socialism. The real Jews are my allies in the political arena. I hate the bastard Left-wing Jews who have turned America away from her Protestant Christian roots. I want those atheist fag-loving gun-hating socialist Jews out of America. Do you likewise want those atheist fag-loving gun-hating socialist Jews out of Israel? Do you hate those atheist fag-loving gun-hating socialist Jews as much as I do? These Left-wing Jews are the CANCER OF AMERICA. It is sad to report the truth that 80 or 90% of Jews in America are far Left-wing, anti-Christian bigots who support abortion rights, homosexual rights, pornography, gun control laws, socialized medicine and environmental extremism. It is so very difficult for human beings to set aside their personal prejudices and look at each situation objectively, but that is what I am going to ask you to do. I am asking you to try to pretend that you are a Christian. I ask you to see things from my point of view. I will do the same in this email. I will try to see things from your point of view. First, let me start with an analogy. Lets pretend that you are an Israeli. Lets pretend that you are an agent in the Mossad. Lets pretend that you have penetrated to the highest levels of Bin Ladens organization. Lets say that you are at a meeting of all of the major leaders of Bin Laden's terrorist organization. At this meeting of 60 of the highest leaders of Bin Laden's organization you discover that they are planning a major terrorist action against civilians in Israel that will kill perhaps a 100, 000 Israeli's. Now here is your dilema: The Mossad has provided you with a Bomb, but you only have one bomb. This is your choice, you can use the bomb to destroy the entire leadership of your enemy, Bin Ladens terrorist organization and the approximately 60 "Generals" in Bin Laden's organization or you can go to the staging site where multiple thousands of low level but highly trained terrorists are getting ready to depart for their mission of terror in Israel. Here is the question, where do you use the bomb? Do you focus on the Generals who are the brains in the army of evil or do you focus on the far more numerous low level peons in the army of evil? Who should you try to neutralize? The leaders or the far more numerous peons. I assert that if you cut off the head the body will die. I assert that you need to focus on those who are supplying the money and the brains and the plans for the Army of evil. Here is my assertion that I hope you will agree with... it is much wiser to focus on the leadership in the army of evil. Do you agree with this as a general principle? I think it is a foregone conclusion. I think that the answer is obvious. I think it would be foolish to do anything other than focus on the leadership in the army of evil. You were wrong. You asserted that I am anti-semitic. I am not. I am focused like a laser on the Generals in the Army of evil. It is sad and unfortunate that such a high percentage of the Jews are Generals in the army of evil that is destroying America. I want you to get inside the heart of a Christian. I want you to see things from a Christian point of view. Please try very hard. Now lets look at the facts about Jews in America and the wealth they control and the influence they wield in our nations capital. These atheist liberal Jews are extremely powerful and they are totally anti-Christian. The liberal Jews who control Hollywood are using their media to indoctrinate the American populace in pro-homosexual, pro-sexual immorality, anti-Christian, anti-conservative concepts of every kind. The liberal Jews who control the ACLU are viciously anti-Christian and are destroying America's Christian underpinnings. Please I beg you to go into your prayer closet and pray before writing back to me. Ask YHWH to help you to see things from a Christian point of view. Lets look at what these Jews, who are generals in the army of evil, that is destroying the moral fabric of America, lets look at what they have done. Hollywood has mocked family values for decades. Hollywood has promoted sex outside of marriage and promoted the entire sexual revolution. Hollywood has warped the thinking of several generations of American youth until we have reached the point where our families are in near total chaos. I blame this on the army of evil called liberalism. Who are the "generals" in the army of evil liberalism in America? It is true that without Jewish money the Democratic party would fold. It is true that 50% of the money that goes to the Democratic party comes from Jews, which is very shocking when you consider that Jews are only 2% of the total population in America. Please try to see this from the conservative Christian point of view. These Jews are wrecking our nation. Yes there are a 100 times, a thousand times more liberals who are non-Jews. But friend we need to look at the Generals in the army of evil and see what percentage of the Generals are liberal Jews. We need to see what percentage of the money that finances left-wing organizations, comes from Jews. Friend, you know better than I do how much money the liberal Jews give to support the entire panopoly of far left-wing organizations. I am asserting that if all Jews in America were right wing, the Democratic party would be DEAD. Liberalism would be DEAD! Jews have lead or financed every far left-wing cause in America. Were there a 100 times more non-Jews in these left-wing organizations, YES, but they had neither the money nor the positions of power in those left-wing org's that the Jews did. These atheist Jews are the Generals in satan army of evil that is wrecking America. This information is not anti-semitic. This is truth. You know that I am not lying. You know that everything I have written in this email is factual. It is very sad that 80 to 90% of American Jews are far left-wing. It is very sad that most Jews support the Clintons, support the homosexual rights movement, support the ACLU, support gun control laws, support banning every mention of Christianity from the public schools, support the marxist feminist movement, support the interpretation of the first amendment to include pornography, support socialized medicine and support socialism and big government in general. It is very sad that Jews were in the forefront of the communist movement in every western nation. It is very sad that Jews have been deceived and have rejected Moses, rejected G-ds Law and have rejected G-d himself. But it is time for you to come to grips with this truth: Jews have been very damaging to America. Will you list all the good things Jews have done? Scientific and medical discoveries, etc, etc. I will list a hundred times more damaging things that these atheist liberal Jews have done to America. It is the liberal Jews, the so called Jewish "humanists" who have brought America to this point of moral implosion. They have been weighed in the scales of justice and they have been found wanting. THIS INFORMATION IS NOT ANTI-SEMITIC. THIS IS THE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH. STOP USING THAT BLUDGEON ON ME. I AM NOT ANTI-SEMITIC. If you call me anti-semitic then what names shall be left for you to use on the real haters, the real Nazi's? I DO NOT HATE ALL JEWS. I love you and I love all of the Jews who are politically conservative and allies of the Christian Right. I would love to have you as a neighbor and I welcome conservative Jews like you into my heart and into our nation. But further than that I don't even wish ill for the liberal Jews. I wish that you would convert them to Judaism. I wish you would convert them to believe in the G-d of Abraham, Issac and Jacob and turn them away from their current state of atheism. Yes, I focus on the Jews and I insist that it is not anti-semitic for me to do so. I attack the Jews because I see them as the Generals in the evil army of those promoting the leftist agenda that is destroying all that I hold dear. This is self-defense and nothing more. These atheist liberal Jews are super wealthy, super successful and super influential and they are using all of that power to destroy the America that I knew in my youth. It is not wrong and it is not anti-semitic to tell this truth. Now I am going to try to see things from your point of view. Help me if I misunderstand. The Jewish people have collective memories of thousands of years of persecution culminating in the Holocaust. You and other Jews look at the things I write and your first thought is about where thinking like this could lead if the majority of Christians started thinking this way about Jews. It is a frightening thought to a Jew. So even if this Bob guy is a decent fellow and he is not really one of the haters, you must marginalize Bob because of the potential fearful possibilities of these ideas about Jews spreading in the minds of the sheeple. I can feel the fear in my own heart. If I was a Jew I also would fear such thoughts and such writings because of the potential end result of such ideas becoming dominant in the minds of the majority populace. I think I understand your point of view (Do you understand mine?). But my answer to you is to work harder on converting Jews to conservatism and converting Jews to faithful Judaism so that they are not enemies of the Christian Right. The answer is NOT to shut up the truth about what 80 to 90% of Jews are doing in America. The answer is NOT to belittle and disparage a sincere Christian who is acting only in self-defense by calling him an ANTI-SEMITE! Can you see things from my point of view? I am sincerely yours with the greatest of respect for you, Your friend, Bob from Michigan. PS - I do not believe in "conspiracy theory." I believe that all of history is a battle of ideas. I believe that most Jews are my enemy in the battle of ideas, so please stop trying to tag me with the "conspiracy" label. PPS - SEE MY COMMENTS ON YOUR LETTER IN ALL "CAPS" BELOW.

1 0

Judges whimsy to deny constitutional rights
by Major Variola (ret) 10 Jan '02

10 Jan '02

[Ed: since most Americans believe in random things (deities, reincarnation, virgin births, angels, heaven, devils, etc.) the "pretty bizarre claims" used to deny a citizen his rights is pretty capricious. CP relevence: JB, CJ, etc; freedom of speech, belief; govt permission to exercise rights] http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,42697,00.html Concealed-Weapon Law Stirs Debate in Alaska ANCHORAGE, Alaska Judge Natalie Finn took away Timothy Wagner's gun permit after he claimed someone had implanted a computer chip in his head and injected him with deadly chemicals. A state appeals court, though, ruled that Finn erred, saying Alaska's concealed-carry law does not allow general concerns about mental illness to play a role in deciding whether someone should have a gun. Gun control advocates say the episode illustrates a dangerous accommodation to the gun lobby by Alaska's Legislature. Gun owners, however, argue that Alaska's law safeguards their Second Amendment rights and that the public is adequately protected. The Department of Public Safety has issued more than 18,000 such permits since 1995, when Alaskans were allowed to carry concealed handguns under restrictions that include an age limit and a gun-safety course. In 1998, the law was amended so that applicants did not have to prove they actually needed to carry a concealed weapon. Also, whether someone was mentally ill or had been treated for mental illness in the preceding five years was taken off the list of questions applicants were asked a change cited by the appeals court last year in Wagner's case. The Alaska law requires applicants to disclose only whether they have ever been committed to a mental hospital or found mentally incompetent by a court. "Yes" answers are grounds for denying a permit. "We wanted to remove the potential for arbitrary and capricious decision making on the part of the issuing agency," said Brian Judy, Alaska liaison for the National Rifle Association. But Nancy Hwa, spokeswoman for the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, complained: "They are taking away the discretion of local law enforcement to make these decisions in the best interest of public safety." Other gun-friendly states, including Texas, Montana and North Carolina, have much stricter standards when it comes to mental instability and concealed-carry permits, said Luis Tolley, the Brady Campaign's state legislative director. In Montana, the law says a sheriff can deny a permit if there is reasonable cause to believe "the applicant is mentally ill, mentally defective or mentally disabled." North Carolina applicants with a "physical or mental infirmity that prevent the safe handling of a handgun" can be denied a permit. Even Texas has a long, broad list under mental health, Tolley said. The restrictions include anyone that has been diagnosed with "a psychiatric disorder or condition" that is likely to cause impairment in judgment, mood, perception or intellectual ability. "Alaska seems more likely than many states to allow mentally ill people to carry guns in public," Tolley said. "By establishing such a narrow definition, that is allowing an awful lot of people who are mentally ill to carry guns in public." Wagner's case began in 1998, when he entered the Alaska Mining and Diving store in Anchorage, dripping wet, and told a clerk he was trying to soak away chemicals in his body before they killed him. He also said a computer chip had been implanted in his head. Another employee overheard the conversation and called police. A background check revealed he had a permit to carry a concealed gun. When an officer asked Wagner if he had a gun with him, Wagner pointed to a briefcase next to him. In it was a loaded .357 and several bags of bullets. Alaska law requires permit holders who come in contact with police to tell officers immediately if they are carrying a concealed gun. Wagner was convicted of failing to do so. Finn sentenced Wagner to three years' probation and ordered him not to possess guns during that period. She also ordered him to forfeit his concealed-gun permit until his mental illness was "either cured or improved." The Department of Public Safety later revoked Wagner's permit based on Finn's decision. Efforts to reach Wagner were unsuccessful. He has no telephone listing in Anchorage. He told the court he was an "inventor" and designed guns and ammunition. The public defender's office said it had not recently heard from him. Wagner had no prior convictions, according to court documents. After his arrest, police took him to a state mental hospital. Wagner testified that he was released after being interviewed. The amended law was enacted over the veto of Gov. Tony Knowles, who warned at the time that the measure could allow dangerous people to carry concealed weapons. The Department of Public Safety has taken a wait-and-see attitude in Wagner's case. He has not again asked for his permit back and no court has ordered it returned, said Del Smith, deputy commissioner. "I think Finn was concerned about his behavior, and rightly so," Smith said. "He made some pretty bizarre claims."

1 0

russian U-235 Fedexed to your door
by Major Variola (ret) 10 Jan '02

10 Jan '02

Russian U-235, $30,000 / kg: http://news.independent.co.uk/world/russia/story.jsp?story=108845 Fedexing hot isotopes: http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/10/national/10RADI.html

1 0

AU Anti-biker Laws
by Michael Motyka 10 Jan '02

10 Jan '02

The thing that caught my eye in the article submitted by spewing nemesis mattd was that in addition to guilt by association, they are using anti-fortification laws to crack down on bikers. I vaguely remember a door-strengthening prohibition somewhere in Europe being mentioned here in the past. Searching for 'fortification law' turns up interesting things. In the US the hits are nutritional, wine, historical and military science items. This gem is from Canada : http://www.ville.montreal.qc.ca/greffe/reglemen/anglais/reglpdf/E-1_1.pdf I especially like the prohibition against observation towers. Apparently that state has determined that its people will live in perforable shacks in order to keep them physically vulnerable should the need for the state to whack them arise. This is a concept that will probably catch on here in the US. What good is a stealth warrant if you can't get in without a cutting torch or dynamic entry if it bounces off and just makes noise? Every well-choreographed play requires a carefully planned setting. Mike

1 0