December 2001 - cypherpunks-legacy

Hammer attack on ex-Intel operative.
by mattd 29 Dec '01

29 Dec '01

Tim May reacts to real anarchists much like dracula does to garlic,thinking of you Timmy,you racist jerk.You die soon. http://www.ainfos.ca/ ________________________________________________ > From: <PhillyARA(a)aol.com> As many of you may or may not be aware, the white supremacist group, World Church of the Creator and their leader Matt Hale will be coming to the Martin Library in York, Pa on January 12th. For more info on the WCOTC please visit: http://www.onepeoplesproject.com/creator.htm The WCOTC is notorious for picking a town with a present or past racial conflict and exploiting the situation to gain new members. This time they are coming to York, Pa because of a race riot that took place in 1969 where a black woman was killed in a hail of gunfire by white youths. The mayor, who at the time was a cop, is being charged with inciting white youths to "kill niggers." Months before the Sept 11th incident, Anti Fascists across North America had noticed a distinct upswing in fascist organization and activity. After Sept 11th, many fascist groups began exploiting the attack to their own advantage and have actually had a dramatic increase in their ranks. Compared to the same time last year, the National Alliance membership has more than doubled! Here in Philly and the surrounding areas, we have seen the effects of this growth. National Alliance stickers started appearing in racially mixed, working class neighborhoods in northeast Philly. Philly Anti Racist Action tore down most of the stickers and put up ARA stickers in their place. A bonehead by the name of Keith Carney was arrested in front of a Vietnam war memorial while he, along with 10 other fascists were putting up National Alliance stickers. Over the summer, Hammer "skins" held a show in Harrisburg, PA with over 100 boneheads in attendance. In recent months, National Alliance affiliated boneheads and Hammer "skins" have been spotted at every major venue, punk show in the city. A table with anti racist literature was kicked over by boneheads at a punk show in Dillsburg, PA. A few months ago, 2 boneheads were arrested in South Jersey for breaking into a black couple's home and beating them with baseball bats while they slept. Attacks have also occurred in Baltimore outside of shows. To put it simply, shit is getting out of hand! Another alarming fact is that fascists such as the National Alliance have been able to mobilize nearly the same amount of people to their demos as Anti Fascists. In Wallingford, CT, the World Church mobilized not only people from their own ranks but klansmen, hammer "skins", and other fascist groups as well. This should be a wake up call to Anti Fascists everywhere. The fascists are crawling out of their caves and from under their stones. We must be there to greet the World Church, pick up the stones, and send them running. Matt Hale cannot be allowed to have a platform to spew his racist filth and divide the working class. Keep the fascists on the run and never let them have the streets! Join us on January 12th! Please forward this to all anti authoritarian groups. More info to follow.... So far this call to action is being endorsed by Philly ARA, Columbus ARA, Barricada Collective, and Tute Nere. If your group would like to endorse this action please contact Philly ARA. For now you can contact Philly ARA at: Email: Philly_ARA @yahoo.com Phone: 215-727-0882 box #3 Columbus ARA can be contacted at: Email: aracolumbus(a)hotmail.com Phone: 614-596-7677 Corralitos East,curt Saxon meet fellow caveman dick Cheney... "It has become crystal clear that the West in general, led by the United States, are full of hatred against Crypto-anarchy Hatred cannot be defined," It's embodied though in the dick May's and Tim Cheneys. Cheney's hiding in a cave, too--in Penn. December 20, 2001 BY DENNIS B. RODDY WAYNESBORO, Pa.--Three hours after Osama bin Laden turned the Pentagon into a disaster area, five helicopters touched down a few hundred yards from Hal Neill's house at the base of Raven Rock Mountain along the Pennsylvania-Maryland border. Within minutes, a convoy of SUVs with black-tinted windows zoomed up Harbaugh Valley Road, turned left, and deposited the weight of the free world inside Site R, the inexplicably named city-in-a-mountain from which the Pentagon has operated and, from all indications Vice President Cheney has directed his office in the days since the Sept. 11 attacks. Site R, with its six-stories of underground offices, a subterranean water reservoir, and banks of mysterious antennas, dishes and massive, steel doors, has been a designated backup command center since it was hewn out of the mountain in 1951. For decades, Site R's presence was a village secret, barely acknowledged to outsiders and attracting little outside interest in turn. ''There are four entrances, but I've only ever been able to find three of them,'' said Neill, as he stood in his back yard, looking over at the guard station next to two oversize metal doors in the hillside. Six military men in sweatsuits jogged their way down the driveway and back up again. ''They weren't doing that before the attacks,'' Neill said. ''Now they're working out.'' The tidy equilibrium of rural life has been upended. ''Day and night, you hear the airplanes,'' said Bonnie Wolfe, whose model railroad shop sits below the flight path of the military jets and helicopters that intermittently pass by, usually unseen, inevitably heard.

1 0

Mushroom clouds over Cali.
by mattd 29 Dec '01

29 Dec '01

The curt saxon of carralitos tries to keep cypherpunks in the dark and fed on BS. Buffer the overflow slayer has been called in to stake the ugly mother. http://www.ainfos.ca/ ________________________________________________ News from the Farm Worker Movement(www.ufw.org): For 14 years, workers at Picksweet Mushroom Farms in Ventura County north of Los Angeles have tried to negotiate a United Farm Workers contract. Picksweet has ignored its workers desires and violated a host of state labor laws. * A detailed nine-count complaint issued on June 26, 2001 by prosecutors with California's Agricultural Labor Relations Board cited Picksweet for bad faith bargaining and illegally conspiring to get rid of the union. * Pictsweet was recently fined $7,475 by the Oregon Occupational Safety and Health Division for safety violations at its Salem plant. One of them caused Enrique Diaz Lupian, 46, to lose his right hand in an accident. Other workers in both Oregon and California have been disciplined or fired for supporting unions. * On Sept. 4, 2001, the state of California filed another complaint against Picksweet for firing Ventura, Calif. mushroom worker Fidel Andrade because he exercised his right to organize and support the UFW. Conditions at Picksweet in Ventura are cruel and dangerous. Mushroom workers labor in dark and damp rooms. Floors are slippery. They only have the lights on their helmets to guide them. Many suffer vision problems. Such conduct is why workers have called for a boycott of Picksweet mushrooms. Picksweet has lost many major customers, including Vons and Safeway supermarkets, and Pizza Hut restaurants. Picksweet workers ask consumers to help them ensure Vons and Safeway continue to keep Picksweet mushrooms off their shelves until a union contract with the Ventura, Calif. plant is signed. Email Vons and Safeway today! Go to http://www.ufw.org/ufw/e-mail.htm and send your e-mail today! For more information on the Farm Worker Movement visit our web site at http://www.ufw.org and/or subscribe to the Farm Worker Movement list serve by sending an e-mail to UFW-subscribe(a)topica.com. To unsubscribe send an e-mail to: UFW-unsubscribe(a)topica.com. AND Scotland Yard probes A-tests By CHRISTINE MIDDAP in London 29dec01 SCOTLAND Yard has launched a criminal investigation into Britain's atomic bomb tests on Christmas Island off Australia's northwest coast in the 1950s. The inquiry centres on claims from the widow of British RAF pilot Eric Denson that military chiefs ordered him to fly his plane through a mushroom cloud several times to collect radioactive samples for scientists in 1958. More than 22,000 British servicemen were involved in, or witnessed, 21 atomic bomb tests in Australia, Christmas Island and other Pacific Islands between 1952 and 1958, according to a report in British newspaper The Guardian. The police inquiry will look at whether it was legal for military chiefs to order Mr Denson to fly through the radioactive cloud. His widow, Shirley, claims the British Government knowingly and maliciously exposed her husband to deadly levels of radiation, which ultimately led to his death. Mr Denson, who developed chronic respiratory and psychological illnesses, committed suicide in 1976. He told his father that as he battled to control the plane in the powerful mushroom cloud, the Tennyson lines: "Into the jaws of Death, into the mouth of Hell," kept going through his mind. Electrical fitter Ken Sutton, now dead, said in a statement that he took recordings from the radioactively "hot" plane the day after Mr Denson's flight. He said in a statement that he was scared to death of the radiation: "You couldn't see it, you couldn't smell it, you couldn't touch it or anything, but you knew damn well it was a killer," he said. Other servicemen have told of their horror at witnessing a nuclear explosion on Christmas Island. Royal Engineers sapper Ken McGinley, then aged 20, said he and others were ordered to sit on a beach before the April 1958 explosion and jam their fists into their eyes. But when he heard the blast he opened his eyes and saw the bones of his hands light up like an X-ray. "The noise was deafening, like a thousand horses thundering towards you. The man next to me broke down and cried," he told The Guardian. The servicemen were ordered not to reveal any information about the tests, but their resolve fractured by the 1980s when they started to develop illnesses and cancers believed to have been caused by the tests The plutonium is in the post Tim.boil away.

1 0

Re: Western Culture,
by mattd 29 Dec '01

29 Dec '01

Brilliant post jya,Kudo's,props,major props(wtf are they,anyway?) A cypherpunk first among sequals.I salute you. The following is an extract on the pitfalls of paternalistic western racist culture and how the united snakes is going down slow.(Rome wasn't burned in a day.) Subject: The twice promised lands The sheer Machiavellian hypocrisy of the Kashmir partition is perfectly well documented. Britain, speaking through Viceroy of India Mountbatten, made a fine proclamation in 1947 : the rulers of princely states should decide about accession to India or Pakistan keeping in mind the geographical situation of their states, ethnic composition of the population and wishes of the people. People on both sides of the religious divide welcomed this principle joyfully and were counting on it in deciding where to live. Then, unexpectedly, at the intervention of Jawahar Lal Nehru (a Kashmiri pandit and a paramour of Lady Mountbatten!) Britain reversed her decision in a matter of 3 days in August 1947, and divided up the Punjab state by giving several Muslim majority districts to India. This violation gave India a border with Kashmir, an invasion route into it, and caused about half a million deaths and 16 million refugees as people scrambled to get onto the right side of the changed border. [1] Kashmir was booby-trapped by the British in 1846, not 1946, in the Treaty of Amritsar wherein England ceded this 80% Muslim land to a Hindu dynasty. Previously, the Moguls were rulers over northern India, so that a Muslim ruler often had Hindu subjects. In 1947, only three out of 562 princes who were of a different religion from their subjects were reluctant to accede to the nation their people desired. Two were Hindu states with Muslim princes, which India simply invaded and annexed with British consent. In the case of Muslim Kashmir, on the contrary, or should we say consistently with millennial Western anti-Muslim policy, Britain and India plotted an intrigue to absorb this gem and important water source into India.[2] 60,000 Muslims had returned home to Kashmir after distinguished fighting for Britain against the Germans. In gratitude, they were banned from the Kashmiri Army, which was manned instead with Hindus and Sikhs imported from India. In Summer 1947 the Hindu Maharajah of Kashmir started a provocative campaign of oppression, banning pro-Pakistani newspapers, applying onerous new taxes and burning down villages. When the inevitable insurrection started, the Maharajah, Pandit Nehru, Lord Mountbatten and Clement Attlee executed a rapid-fire, obviously prepared charade to sanctify an Indian invasion. Nehru promised the world that the attack had nothing to do with annexation, but only with maintaining law and order. Mountbatten issued a pearl of neo-imperialistic hypocritical prose which is worth study, to help recognize the genre as you unravel the ceaseless spin in todays media: As soon as law and order have been restored in Kashmir and her soil cleared of the invader, the question of the State's accession should be settled by a reference to the people. Meanwhile action has been taken today to send troops of the Indian Army to Kashmir.[3] See the pattern? A high ideal is couched in terms of the impossible fulfillment - law and order could never be restored once the Indian invasion started, and the so-called invaders to be cleared of the soil were the sons and tillers of that very soil! Simultaneously, with words shouting louder than a revivalist preacher, acts and facts hit the ground. Britain invaded Kashmir with Indian troops. And for fifty-four years she picks her royal nose and looks on like it was none of her affair! The same sick warp pervades the UN and international opinion fora. Reuters baldly datelines stories from Srinagar, India in the revolt-racked Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir - even though India needs 700,000 troops to hold onto these Muslim provinces, which Nehru promised never to annex when he and his cuckold buddy Mountbatten invaded them. What look like olive leaves on the UN seal really come from a fig tree. UN resolution #48 from 1948 calls for Pakistan to remove irregular guerrillas BEFORE India removes its regular army - although Kashmir is Pakistani by British and International rules, and the irregulars may or may not be from outside Kashmir: they are just a convenient red herring. Such conscience-numbing mumbo-jumbo resolutions are merely a guarantee of eternal military occupation, a license for progressive ethnic cleansing and eventual complete absorption by non-Muslim invaders. Sound like the broken record we all know from Palestine? Until Arafat keeps all kids indoors, Israel may continue to occupy, annex, oppress and make refugees of the Muslim majority. Britains comment on it: What, me, worry? Our American colonies will see the wogs off the property. Britain is only playing dead. She remains the all-time master of propaganda warfare (remember the Belgian kids with their hands cut off by the Germans on the phony posters that helped get US into WWI?) It is well within her means either to take direct military action, as she did in the Falklands, or to mobilize a military and diplomatic coalition to set matters to rights in two countries she ruined, Palestine and Kashmir. The will is lacking. Why? Hmm. The West singled out the Muslim world long ago as Enemy Number One, and has made this a self-fulfilling prophecy. There are many aspects to this. In the Western subconscious, there is the memory of the Crusades and the defeat by Saladin. Further back, Christianity has a guilty conscience: it swapped monotheistic purity for power and pagan lore, only to be crushed by the fall of Rome, and eclipsed by the glory of Islamic faith, culture and science for centuries. It was a millennium later that a materialist - fundamentalist Europe picked itself up on arms and technology and avenged itself on the planet. The Islamic axis, extending from Morocco to Indonesia, lay athwart the playground of world empire, blocking the Suez and Central Asian passages to India. In 1840, when Britain fought a war to force Chinamen to remain impassive consumers of Indian opium from British ships, she also eliminated the upstart Ahmed Pasha in Egypt, who had dared to industrialize and start the process of Arab unity by joining with Syria. Then the Afghans could not be subdued, the Sudanese dervishes broke the British square, and Muslims often revealed a dangerous immunity to Western consumerism. Something scary about these Mohamedans. Enough to bury the hatchet with any enemy that goes in with us against them. Start by giving those shiftless Jews Palestine and some useful work to do by splitting the Muslim world in half: even though it took half of the 19th century for Britains skunk works to interest the Jews in the scheme - and about half a minute to get the world to forget who dreamed up the fatal idea! Give Vladimir Putsch - in a hand with genocide in Chechnya and a seat in NATO as an ally against Islam. Why not, we have an infallible precedent from the 13th century, when the Pope called Genghiz Khan brother for his services in bathing Muslim Asia in babies blood. Mah fellow fundamentalists, know today that Whoever is not with McWorld is against it. Indifference will not be tolerated, certainly not from a religion of peace! The US-UK policy has been largely successful. Muslim nations remain bitterly divided. They cant even manufacture their own weapons, by Jove. Aside from a few hysterically unstable regimes (neat label, that R-word), plutocratic neo-imperialism is the rule: you know, old boy, sort of mercantilist remote control, with some of your local figurehead Oreos on the take. Yes, the West is a thundering success by its own measures - but humanity will be a failure if those measures become universal. That is the only reason to hope: this can not be Gods plan, or Darwins, whomever you believe in. Meanwhile, though, the massed mammon worshippers have been rewarded by their deity with all the appearances of a comfortably superior position. After detailing the tale of Britains responsibility, one Pakistani writer only musters the courage to modestly propose: To rid the 1200 million humanity (India and Pakistan) of its miseries caused by a wrong act of British Indian Government, Britain should now use her influence in the world and in the Common Wealth, and support/launch initiatives in a meaningful manner for seeking a just solution of the Kashmir problem.[4] But Britain is not about to do this when she can sit and smirk by the hearth instead. Kashmiris, Palestinians and their representatives should file complaints and suits against Britain in every possible world forum, and at least wipe away that snide sneer for awhile. Deviousness is no defense in criminal cases. On the contrary. Even in England, mind you. Notes: [1]. http://www.unol.org/messages/17765.shtml [2]. http://www.klc.org.pk/klc/books/kashmir-3.htm [3]. http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/kasmount.htm [4]. http://www.unol.org/messages/17765.shtml Mr. John-Paul Leonard is a free-lance writer and a regular contributor to Media Monitors Network (MMN) Source: by courtesy & ) 2001 John-Paul Leonard by the same author: The Twice Promised Land http://www.mediamonitors.net/leonard1.html and More in MMN 'Perspective' @ http://www.mediamonitors.net/perspective.html

1 0

Kidnap jerk and lift.
by mattd 29 Dec '01

29 Dec '01

http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5478,3505834%255E2862,… ransom demand for student By ELISSA HUNT, Magistrates' Court reporter 29dec01 A WEIGHTLIFTER helped snatch a student from his home in a $1.5 million kidnapping plot, a court has heard. Robert Fernandez, 25, is accused of grabbing the 21-year-old from his suburban driveway on March 3 this year. A 10-month investigation by the tactical response squad has seen several men charged with kidnapping the student and holding him hostage for 15 days, in a bid to get $1.5 million in ransom from his widowed mother. Sen-Det Phil Gynther told Melbourne Magistrates' Court phone conversations indicated Mr Fernandez was employed to assault a Cranbourne accountant by breaking his legs in August 1999. The former bouncer was asked by another man to "sort out" a person who owed him $130,000, the court heard. Sen-Det Gynther said the kidnapping victim described one of his attackers as a big man with a ponytail. He was later taken to a weightlifting competition in St Kilda where he identified Mr Fernandez, who was a competitor. The student was shocked with an electrical device and bundled into a car by several men on March 3. The court heard he was hooded, bound with cable ties and left in a garage before being moved to a house, where he was held for a week. He was later moved from motel to motel by his kidnappers, who brought him takeaway food. The abductors made about 37 ransom demands of the student's family, first asking for $1.5 million but later dropping their price to $800,000. Police freed the student after 15 days. Businessman Alex Yang Su, 33, and Shaun Goerlitz, 29, are in custody over the kidnapping. Sen-Det Gynther said he feared Mr Fernandez, an architectural draughtsman, would try to flee the country. Sen-Det Gynther said evidence indicated Mr Fernandez's role was as part of the snatch team and he did not take part in the ransom demands. Defence lawyer Steven Pica said his client had no prior convictions and needed to be able to continue working. Magistrate Barbara Cotterell refused bail and remanded Mr Fernandez in custody to appear at the same court on March 25. Wonder if the curt Saxon of corralitos has any close relatives in the compound?

1 0

VANGUARD: Actions Have Consequences: or, How to Advance Your Beliefs By Helping a Candidate (fwd)
by Jim Choate 28 Dec '01

28 Dec '01

---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 14:41:15 -0800 From: "TheVanguard.org" <Vanguard(a)theVanguard.org> To: "TheVanguard.org" <Vanguard(a)theVanguard.org> Subject: VANGUARD: Actions Have Consequences: or, How to Advance Your Beliefs By Helping a Candidate [EDITOR'S NOTE: In honor of the approaching election year, we take this opportunity to distribute the following article by Rod D. Martin, founder and chairman of Vanguard PAC.] ========================== Vanguard of the Revolution http://www.theVanguard.org ACTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES: or, How to Advance Your Beliefs By Helping a Candidate by Rod D. Martin � 27 March 2001 Conservatives forever complain about their political leaders. But they don�t do a lot about it. Liberals (or more precisely, Leftists) are quite different. Coming as they do mostly from distinct interest groups possessing activist political cultures and a sense of victimization (be they unionized workers, civil rights activists, feminists or whomever), leftists grow up on a steady diet not only of ideas, but of the strategies and tactics necessary to win. From cradle to grave, they look to the state as a sort of political savior, and they learn early how to get from it what they want. By contrast, conservatives do not and never have thought in these terms. Generally, conservatives just want to be left alone, and see government as a necessary evil, nothing more. Their lives focus elsewhere: business, church, family, civic groups, almost anywhere but politics. They see political activity not as a perpetual opportunity to gain advantages, but as an arena where (every so often) they must defend themselves from the latest government encroachment. This difference in culture is staggering, and accounts for much of the Left�s success in the 20th Century. Conservatives do not think politically; Liberals do. And while the Left hones its strategies and tactics year after year � spread across millions of individual people and thousands of institutions � conservatives wake up periodically, notice there�s an election, expend a little half-hearted effort, and go back to sleep. Because of this relative detachment, conservatives demonstrate a remarkably persistent naivet�. Not only do they rarely understand the system (or what the Left has done and continues to do to them); they also subscribe year after year to the Sir Galahad theory of politics: "our ideas will win because our hearts are pure." This foolishness costs their movement not only elections but innumerable volunteers (and donors) every year, good men and women who cannot understand why their sheer rightness has not persuaded and conquered all. Meanwhile, the Left marches on. The hard truth is, however wonderful our ideas may be, it is not those ideas but the actions they inspire which have consequences in the real world.1 And all those whiney conservatives, waiting for Trent Lott (or whomever) to effortlessly give them their hearts� desires, are getting exactly what they deserve. The concept is as old as the Bible: those who do not work, shall not eat. INFLUENCE AND POWER At times almost despite themselves, conservatives over the past generation have come to hold tremendous influence. They have also held some power. The confusion of these concepts has lead to much needless consternation. In Morton Blackwell�s words, "Power means you can make things happen. Influence means that those with power will return your telephone calls and seriously consider what you suggest. Only those with power govern." The aim of any political movement is power, power for the purpose of implementing the movement�s beliefs. All the influence in the world will not replace this power. In the 1990s, many conservatives became highly disillusioned with their leaders, who seemed to constantly compromise. They failed to understand that though Republicans held the Congress, conservatives were still a minority. They had gained tremendous influence, but only a share of the power. Having a seat at the table, they could dicker, but they could not dictate. They needed numbers. There�s only one way they will ever get those numbers: they must elect more conservatives. Not Republicans; conservatives. This is no slap at the Republican Party: it is simply a recognition that the two ideas are not synonymous, however much overlap there may be, and that if conservatives want that to change, they�ll have to work for that too. Furthermore, it�s a statement that the party primary often matters a great deal; and that � as the Left has always known � the political cycle is year-round, every year. In that never-ending fight, it is the candidates who go out to do battle, who bleed and sweat and die for your beliefs. And at the end of the day, they � and only they � will have a chance to make and execute the laws. Most people will never be candidates. At most they will only have influence (which is certainly not to be despised), and many won�t even have that. But they can give their ideas power � and exercise a measure of power themselves � by working hard for a candidate who shares their views. In fact, there is absolutely no more effective way than this by which the average person may bring about meaningful political change. SO WHAT CAN I DO? The question for many, therefore, becomes: "So what can I do? And what could I possibly offer." The answer is, "Quite a lot!" For all the talk of big money in politics, the truth is that most campaigns are run on shoestrings, with the lion�s share of what cash there might be going to television ads at the very end, leaving all the real work to be done on almost nothing. Nowhere is this more true than in a challenger race, where a (usually semi-unknown) candidate tries to make headway against everything the other party can throw at him, and often everything his own party can throw at him too (this is not a criticism: parties shouldn�t just give away their nomination, after all). This is usually your candidate (we�re trying to gain seats, after all): tired, broke and pummeled from all sides. Yes, there�s quite a lot you can do for this candidate. Even a handful of truly faithful people could change his world, and the outcome of the election. Speaking as a former (and future) candidate for the U.S. House, I submit the following items you can and should do for the standard-bearer of your choice. The list is not exhaustive, but it will keep you both busy and effective. 1. PICK A CANDIDATE. With all due respect to those wonderful men and women who yearly work in support of every candidate in sight, there remains great wisdom in Christ�s words that no one can serve two masters. The average volunteer has neither time nor mental energy for more than one race, at least not beyond a superficial level. Hence, if you don�t pick one candidate on whom to focus, you will do a bad job for everyone, and advance the cause very little. Picking a candidate is a matter of taste: who excites you, who believes most like you, who is running for an office you care about, who is running against someone you really want defeated. The issue is not whether you throw yourself wholeheartedly into a campaign for Congress or for Justice of the Peace; rather, the issue is whether you pick one and follow through. Finally, make your choice early and stick like glue. The early phases of a campaign are generally its most tenuous, with limited support, little or no money, and the most overwhelming task of all: getting noticed and breaking out of the pack. Likewise, later on, the campaign will certainly face any number of challenges, from run-away success (which often leads to complacency and defeat) to persistently low polling numbers (which are often misleading, but run away crucial support) to crippling allegations (which may or may not be true) to internal incompetence or strife among the volunteers or staff. Murphy�s Law was specifically written for political campaigns, and you need to be there through thick and thin, working like everything depended on you. When the smoke clears, and hordes of others have fallen away, it may just turn out that everything did. 2. PICK THE RIGHT CANDIDATE. Since you�re going to be working so hard and so long for this person, you really need to pick well from the start. Again, this is a matter of taste; and yet most conservatives have very specific ideological views they want their candidates to share, and insofar as possible this should be determined up front. This is not to say that the candidate owes you limitless time; neither is it to say that you have a right to treat him rudely or "examine" him like a professor. But if he�s written extensively (and some candidates have), read what he�s written. Call him on the phone or email him: some candidates respond very well to this. If he�s reasonably accessible, feel free to ask him to dinner (and buy his dinner: he�s broke. He�s giving up all his time, income and personal savings to work around the clock for you). Don�t get offended if he�s not available, either (and expect to be passed to a scheduler): he has a family, possibly a job, and literally thousands if not millions of other people also seeking his time. If worse comes to worst, you can usually speak with him at or after political meetings or speeches. But somehow, get to know him, not necessarily like you know your best friend, but well enough to determine whether you think he�s a good guy, whether you trust him, and whether you want to see him win. When the chips are down, these feelings and impressions may make the difference between victory and defeat. 3. CUT HIM SOME SLACK. Once you�ve picked him, remember that the candidate is human, just like you. You make mistakes, you sometimes fail to think before you speak, you don�t always know everything about everything, and every now and then you do something really wrong. So does your candidate. Take it for granted. Now admittedly, if the candidate turns out to be an axe-murderer, you might want to re-think your support. But short of that, it�s important to be very realistic: just as when you married, you picked this guy for better or worse, and you know on the front end he�s going to have unseen warts. Bailing at the first sign of trouble � or at the first policy disagreement � is not only bad form, it�s cowardly. And if you�re looking for a candidate who perfectly reflects your own views, go run yourself. Now of course, you may certainly seek to educate your candidate: maybe he just doesn�t understand, or hasn�t ever thought about what you believe, or is getting bad advice. Look for an opportunity to politely, concisely and effectively present your side. But don�t take it personally if you fail to convince him: you may well do so later, and even if you don�t, if you picked him in the first place, chances are that disagreements on one or two issues are nothing compared to all the things about which you agree. 4. GIVE MONEY, EVEN IF IT�S ONLY A LITTLE. No matter what you can or cannot give, this matters, more than you know. And the earlier you give, the more it matters. Everyone knows that campaigns run on money; what they don�t always grasp is that a successful candidate must spend at least half his time just raising that cash. Challengers have a special problem, in that the people who can most help them judge their viability by how much they raise early, and from how many different donors they raise it. Your $25 check is a vital part of building the support your candidate needs from so-called "major donors", from the party committees in Washington, from potential endorsers, and from the media. It will also buy about 167 desperately-needed bulk-rate stamps. Obviously, it is essential that you give as much as you can. Far fewer people are giving than you think, and your candidate is spending enormous time (and money) reaching them. Your early help will make his work easier, more effective, and more concentrated on actual campaigning. Oh, and one other thing: if a candidate tells you he�s in a financial crisis, don�t just assume it�s a sales pitch. It�s almost always true. 5. LET THE CAMPAIGN KNOW YOU�RE AVAILABLE, AND FIND OUT WHAT IT NEEDS. As important as money is, nothing you can give is so valuable as your time; and the campaign could never pay enough people to replace its better volunteers. Be one. How do you do this? Call the campaign and let them know you want to help. Below I will give some specific ideas which you should offer (the campaign does not always know what it needs, since it�s almost always understaffed and under-funded); however, you should also make yourself generally available, and be open to the specific requests the campaign may make. Who do I mean when I say "the campaign"? There�s no one answer. It could be a campaign manager, a volunteer coordinator, a scheduler, the candidate himself, or any number of other people. And it may well shift from week to week. Don�t let this daunt you. Just go with the flow, and be patient. If you�ve offered yourself and the campaign hasn�t gotten back with you, politely offer again, and again: chances are, you�ve gotten lost in an almost impossible shuffle (and if you have time and organization ability, this may be your cue to volunteer as an office manager). Don�t be foolishly offended by the chaos that characterizes every campaign. Instead, view it as an opportunity to make a desperately needed difference. 6. HOST AN EVENT. More than anything else, candidates need exposure and money. Kill two birds with one stone and host a coffee (or something bigger). Nothing is as important as these events, whereby you bring your candidate and your friends together. The friends will come for your sake; the candidate will gain credibility with them because of you; and if you pass the plate, you�ll raise some money, all for the cost of some Folger�s. Many successful candidates learn to book three to five of these a day, which should tell you how vital they are, and which should also tell you how many people are going to have to agree to host them. Don�t wait to be asked: volunteer early, and often. 7. MAKE PHONE CALLS. Phone banks cost a lot of money, but are a phenomenally effective tool, for polling, fundraising, getting out the vote and a thousand other things. You can save the campaign tons of cash by being a phone volunteer. It�s not the most pleasant work you�ll ever do, but it can be very rewarding, and is vital to the effort. Make sure the campaign provides you a script, and practice it a few times before you start your calls. Separately, you can and should use your phone to help the campaign in a very obvious and simple way: talk to your friends about how wonderful your candidate is, and how proud of him you are. This sort of casual, day-in-day-out effort � no different from talking about how excited you are about your favorite team � is the stuff of great victories. When people start talking like this, a certain "win psychology" develops, and real momentum builds: momentum money could never buy. 8. USE EMAIL EFFECTIVELY. At least as powerful as personal phone calls, personal emails to friends are taking a greater and greater role in campaigns. Spread the word to your friends, by forwarding campaign emails, news stories, and your own personal thoughts to your personal address book. You send all those people lame jokes: why not the good news about your candidate (and your worldview)? Moreover, it may be that you are specially talented with email or the web and wish to help in a more formal way. Most campaigns need quality people who can create and maintain an online presence, be it a website, an email list, a chat room, or a prayer team (and just for the record, no one has used the internet more effectively than Pat Buchanan�s Linda Muller, with Jesse Ventura�s team running a close second). If you�d like to help this way, you�re needed. 9. WRITE LETTERS TO THE EDITOR. Everyone talks about this, but no one does it. No one except winning campaigns, that is. The truth is, everyone reads the letters to the editor, and much of the word-of-mouth side of the campaign develops there. What�s more, this is absolutely free media, and being from "regular" people, it is far more persuasive than a campaign news release (which few ever see anyway). A smart campaign will organize a large number of people to regularly write letters to the editor, and mail them to all the local papers. Don�t wait to be contacted: call the campaign yourself, preferably the press secretary. If possible, write about the message the campaign is focused on that week. And if you�re a good writer, find some of your friends who would be willing to sign a letter but are afraid to actually write one, and draft letters for them as well (be sure to collect them and mail them too: people promise, but often forget). 10. STUFF ENVELOPES! No part of the campaign is so important, especially in an under-funded race where most or all of the direct mail has to be done in-house. At the same time, stuffing and addressing envelopes is some of the most tedious work you can do, and people hate it. It�s not sexy, and it�s not fun. Volunteers tend to flee. You can not only make an enormous difference but prove your value and loyalty as well by always being available for this duty. You can often save the campaign hundreds or thousands of dollars through your work, and candidates remember their envelope stuffers more fondly than anyone else (very important later when you want to "educate" them on the issues). 11. HELP WITH THE SIGN EFFORT. Obviously a crucial part of the campaign�s advertising, the need is not so much for you to put up a sign in your own yard (which of course you should do), but to help put signs up all over your candidate�s district. Ideally, your candidate will want to put a sign in every available yard, all on the same night. Anything you can do to find willing property owners or physically put up signs will make a huge difference. 12. GET OUT THE VOTE. Conservative candidates have an alarming tendency to run winning campaigns, only to lose on election day. This is because the Left is extremely effective at getting out their voters, while we generally are not. One reason for that effectiveness is that Left-leaning labor unions teach and encourage get-out-the-vote (GOTV) efforts. Conservatives have no similar resource. Talk to the campaign about what you can do. Hopefully, they will have a carefully laid out plan, which will probably include early canvassing, an absentee ballot effort, poll watching, phone banks, and any number of other things. Be flexible and pitch in. If you don�t, you may throw away a couple years� work. 13. PRAY FOR AND ENCOURAGE THE CANDIDATE. As noted at the outset of the article, conservatives complain a lot, and never more than in a campaign. But campaigns run on morale, and complaints are among the most self-destructive things under Heaven. And it�s not just the other campaign workers and volunteers who need a lift: it�s the candidate himself. The candidate � if he�s worth supporting � is killing himself. You may at times think he�s arrogant, and sometimes he may be; but he runs on adrenaline and supports himself with brave words that rarely resemble his fears, and from early in the morning till late at night, he has to sell a million skeptics � from CEOs to coffee shop clerks � on himself as a person and his ideas as a program. He is the ultimate "man in the arena", facing every manner of outrageous attack and betrayal every day, working himself to the bone, trying to juggle finances and family and every aspect of this small industry the product of which is himself, all in pursuit of a goal far greater than he. The smallest word of encouragement at the right moment can be that one thing which allows him to go on. In point of fact, it often is. Likewise, no one needs your prayers more than your candidate and his family. The Bible clearly commands prayer for our leaders, but most people forget to do it. You mustn�t. He needs you. And more than anything, he needs the grace of God. 14. UNDERSTAND THAT WINNING ISN�T EVERYTHING. Finally, it�s well worth remembering that most candidates lose, and often lose several times, before they win. This dispirits lots of volunteers (and even more candidates), but it shouldn�t: it�s just the way of the world. The early races are often learning experiences and opportunities to build an organization and the candidate�s name ID. This is a good thing, no matter how much more fun it might be to win every time. The wise volunteer will work as though victory is just a matter of doing that one additional thing within his power; but he�ll also know when to take his co-workers and his candidate aside, place his hand on their shoulder, and tell them it�s all going to be okay, we�ll get �em next time. That wise volunteer will also follow through on his words, and stay the course for round two. Few decent candidates come out of a well-fought but losing race weaker; most are in a better position than they�ve ever been in their life, if they�ll learn from their mistakes and move on. You can be the person who gives them the strength to do it. And in so doing, you will advance your cause concretely, genuinely doing the hard work of freedom. --------------------------- NOTE 1. Needless to say for those who have actually read him, Richard Weaver � whose Ideas Have Consequences has in its title lead many astray at this point � understood this perfectly; and his short but powerful book remains one of the truly essential works of conservatism. PURCHASE RICHARD WEAVER'S EXTRAORDINARY "IDEAS HAVE CONSEQUENCES": http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0226876802/vanguardoftherev/ --------------------------- -- Rod D. Martin is Founder and Chairman of Vanguard PAC. A former policy director to Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, he is an attorney and writer from Little Rock, Arkansas, and a past candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives. ================================================================ To subscribe to "Vanguard of the Revolution", send the message "Subscribe Vanguard", or the message "Unsubscribe Vanguard" to unsubscribe, to listadmin(a)theVanguard.org. Contact listowner(a)theVanguard.org if you have questions. ================================================================ http://www.theVanguard.org Vanguard(a)theVanguard.org Vanguard PAC P. O. Box 250038 Little Rock, AR 72225 ================================================================

1 0

Las Vegas spore hub
by Anonymous 28 Dec '01

28 Dec '01

Members of the 11Sept2001 sleeper cells visited Las Vegas. Among the many interesting points about Las Vegas are the large numbers of tourists that stay in a very small number of facilities. Anthrax or some other biological warfare (BW) agent delivered to the casino/hotel systems (through air circulation systems, HVAC) would expose tens of thousands at a time; most of those individuals would enter the mass transportation systems (airports, aircraft, trains, buses), spreading the infectious agent/infection, and arriving back at their home destinations before common incubation periods would become an issue. Yes, the CDC is prepared to deliver 'push-packages' to cities in the U.S., but could it handle tens of thousands of possible cases throughout the entire U.S. and the world? Could airports and aircraft be decontaminated effectively? The 'test cases' of anthrax through the U.S. postal system expose the frightening potential of BW agents--the spores persist, travel, and are a trickier problem than thought. Even with few fatalities, the mass transportation systems of the U.S. would come to a crashing halt.] http://www.metatempo.com/analysis-alqaida-tradecraft.html

1 0

Tim May;Anarcho-phony,cheap fraud and despicable coward.RIP.
by mattd 28 Dec '01

28 Dec '01

In simplest terms, anarchism stands against not just government, but all forms of domination and exploitation. This includes government, but also capitalism, landlordism, interest, and profit. In addition, anarchism stands for decentralized direct democracy, free association, the replacement of capitalist private property "rights" with possession/use rights, direct worker ownership and control of the means of production, direct action instead of political action, delegation instead of representation, and total freedom (which is inherently limited by the "other person's nose"). Anarchism is a variant of socialism, because it is for workers' control of the means of production, but is a form of libertarian socialism rather than state socialism. Unlike the various sorts of state socialism, anarchism is for not only workers' control of the means of production, but direct democratic control of all aspects of life (instead of by some self-appointed "party" or legislature which supposedly knows and acts in the interests of the people). Those things which are difficult to control at a small level where immediate direct democracy can be practiced are controlled through delegation, which is different from representation because the delegates are not only chosen by the rank and file, but are also given mandates that they must and must only carry out by the rank and file, and can be recalled at any time for any reason (all of these are done in a directly democratic fashion). Anarchism stands against capitalism, because capitalism is inherently authoritarian. Those who say that capitalism is freedom, forget to say that it is just freedom for only those who are in the ruling class. As for the workers, who make up the vast majority of the population, the only freedom they have under it is to choose who exploits them. They have no real control over the means of production. They do not receive the fruits of their labor; all they get is their paycheck, which they need to survive (which is why most people really don't have the freedom to not be employed by anyone, unlike what supporters of capitalism say). There is no real democracy in capitalism; the workplace is run in a thoroughly authoritarian fashion by a hierarchy of bosses and managers, ending up at the top with the executives and big shareholders. Anarchism also stands against state socialism and "Communism," because those also aren't freedom in any respect. First thing, most forms of "state socialism" and "Communism" are really state capitalism, which is similar to private capitalism except that the government replaces the company as the unit of competition, the ruling class is composed of the Party apparatchiks and or the politicians and bureaucrats which make up the government, and that one doesn't have the choice of what/who they are exploited by. "Communism" is really like the "cradle-to-grave" capitalism, where one not only works in company factories, but also in company houses in company towns, etc. On the other hand, anarchists tend to prefer state socialism over private capitalism, because there at least is some social support structure rather than none at all (this does not mean that they advocate or are willing to settle with state socialism, though). At the same time, anarchists often treat Communists (especially Stalinists) in the same fashion as fascists and such (even to the point of armed conflict). Anarchism is a very often misunderstood political theory (not ideology, because ideology means a fixed set of prescribed ideas that are automatically correct as a block), which forms a real alternative to both capitalism and state socialism, both republican ("democratic") and autocratic/totalitarian. It is for both freedom and social justice, rather than just for social justice or "freedom" (capitalism claims to be for freedom, but really isn't for that at all). It is against impersonal "representation," where a body of elected politicians from an elite make decisions for the rank and file without their input, and replaces that with making decisions directly and democratically, and carrying out in the same exact fashion. It empowers the people directly, rather than empowering some elite to act in their name. Luckily, anarchism today has very significantly replaced state socialism on the far left, and is further expanding, but anarchism still has a very far way to go until there will be any real revolutionary change.

7 7

[fsml] Euro Banknotes embed RFID chips (fwd)
by Eugene Leitl 28 Dec '01

28 Dec '01

-- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> ______________________________________________________________ ICBMTO: N48 04'14.8'' E11 36'41.2'' http://www.leitl.org 57F9CFD3: ED90 0433 EB74 E4A9 537F CFF5 86E7 629B 57F9 CFD3 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 00:36:31 -0000 From: Andrew Hennessey <pegasus(a)easynet.co.uk> Reply-To: fsml(a)yahoogroups.com To: fsml(a)yahoogroups.com Subject: [fsml] Euro Banknotes embed RFID chips http://www.eetimes.com/story/OEG20011219S0016 Euro bank notes to embed RFID chips by 2005 By Junko Yoshida EE Times (12/19/01, 3:03 p.m. EST) SAN MATEO, Calif. - The European Central Bank is working with technology partners on a hush-hush project to embed radio frequency identification tags into the very fibers of euro bank notes by 2005, EE Times has learned. Intended to foil counterfeiters, the project is developing as Europe prepares for a massive changeover to the euro, and would create an instant mass market for RFID chips, which have long sought profitable application. The banking community and chip suppliers say the integration of an RFID antenna and chip on a bank note is technically possible, but no bank notes in the world today employ such a technology. Critics say it's unclear if the technology can be implemented at a cost that can justify the effort, and question whether it is robust enough to survive the rough-and-tumble life span of paper money. A spokesman for the European Central Bank (ECB) in Frankfurt, Germany confirmed the existence of a project, but was careful not to comment on its technologies. At least two European semiconductor makers contacted by EE Times, Philips Semiconductors and Infineon Technologies, acknowledged their awareness of the ECB project but said they are under strict nondisclosure agreements. The euro will become "the most common currency in the world" at midnight on Jan. 1, when 12 nations embrace it, according to Ingo Susemihl, vice president and general manager of RFID group at Infineon. The ECB and criminal investigators in Europe are already on high alert, worried not only about counterfeiting of a currency most people haven't seen, but also of a possible increase in money laundering, given the euro's broad cross-border reach. The ECB said 14.5 billion bank notes are being produced, 10 billion of which will go into circulation at once in January, with 4.5 billion being held in reserve to accommodate potential leaps in demand. Thwarting underworld popularity Although euro bank notes already include such security features as holograms, foil stripes, special threads, microprinting, special inks and watermarks, the ECB believes it must add further protection to keep the euro from becoming the currency of choice in the criminal underworld, where the U.S. dollar is now the world's most counterfeited currency. The ECB spokesman said his organization has contacted various central banks worldwide - not just in Europe - to discuss added security measures for the currency. In theory, an RFID tag's ability to read and write information to a bank note could make it very difficult, for example, for kidnappers to ask for "unmarked" bills. Further, a tag would give governments and law enforcement agencies a means to literally "follow the money" in illegal transactions. "The RFID allows money to carry its own history," by recording information about where it has been, said Paul Saffo, director of Institute for the Future (Menlo Park, Calif.). The embedding of an RFID tag on a bank note is "a fundamental departure" from the conventional security measures applied to currency, Saffo said. "Most [currency] security today is based on a false premise that people would look at the money to see if it is counterfeit," he said. But "nobody does that. The RFID chip is an important advance because it no longer depends on humans" to spot funny money. RFID basics The basic technology building blocks for RFID on bank notes are similar to those required for today's smart labels or contactless cards. They require a contactless data link that can automatically collect information about a product, place, time or transaction. Smart labels produced by companies such as Philips Semiconductors, Infineon, STMicroelectronics and Texas Instruments are already used in such applications as smart airline luggage tags, library books and for supply chain management of various products. "Two minimum elements you need for RFID are a chip and an antenna," according to Gordon Kenneth Andrew Oswald, associate director at Arthur D. Little Inc., a technology consulting firm based in Cambridge, Mass. When a bank note passes through reader equipment, the antenna on the note collects energy and converts it to electric energy to activates the chip, he said. The antenna then "provides a communication path between a chip [on the bank note] and the rest of the world," said Tres Wiley, emerging markets strategy manager for RFID Systems at TI. For its part, the chip "is a dedicated processor to handle protocols, to carry out data encoding to send and receive data and address memory" embedded on the chip. Although the industry is "well down the road with the smart label technology," Wiley said he was "a bit surprised to learn that someone goes to that extent - to embed RFID into bank notes - to combat counterfeit money." A number of challenges must be overcome before RFID tags can be embedded on bills, said Kevin Ashton, executive director of the Auto ID Center at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. "The most obvious one is the price," he said. Today's RFID tags cost between 20 cents to $1.00, and "that's not economic enough for most bills," Ashton said. "We've absolutely got to get the cost way down." The goal of the Auto ID Center is to find an application that requires billions of RFID chips to bring their cost as low as 5 cents, he added. While most chip companies with RFID expertise are keeping their plans for money applications close to their chest, Hitachi Ltd. announced plans last July for a chip designed for paper money that would pack RF circuitry and ROM in a 0.4-mm square circuit measuring 60 microns thick. Although the chip features no rewritable capability, Ryo Imura, chief executive of Hitachi's Mew Solutions venture, said at the time of announcement, "We'll consider them for the next generation [of] products." Hitachi's chip stores encrypted ID information in ROM during the manufacturing process, presumably to replace the serial number of each bank note. Even without writable memory, Hitachi's chip is said to be fairly costly. Hitachi declined to be interviewed for this article. While the size of the rewritable memory embedded on an RFID chip will determine the kinds of information it can store, it also affects the chip's cost. Affordable with bigger bills It is unclear whether the ECB will incorporate RFID chips into all euro bank notes or just on the larger bills. The EUR 200 and EUR 500 bank notes in particular - equivalent to roughly $200 and $500 in value - are expected to be popular in the "informal" economy. Embedding a 30 cents chip into a EUR 500 bill would make more sense than putting it into a European buck, several industry sources said. Manufacturing processes are also considered a major hurdle to embedding a low-cost antenna and chip onto bank notes. "The chip is already so small," MIT's Ashton said. "To connect the two ends of a coil - an antenna - at precisely the right place on a chip could present a major problem." A printing process is an option, Ashton said, but "you need a breakthrough in the high-volume manufacturing process." Such a technology does not exist today, he said. Size and thickness are key attributes of an RFID chip for paper currency, said Karsten Ottenberg, senior vice president and general manager of business unit identification at Philips Semiconductors. "For putting chips into documents, they need to be very small - less than a square millimeter - and thin such that they are not cracking under mechanical stress of the document. Thinning down to 50 micron and below is a key challenge." That would require advanced mechanical and chemical techniques, he said. Bank notes present "an interesting future application for us," said Tom Pounds, vice president of RFID projects at Alien Technology, which holds the rights to a fabrication process that suspends tiny semiconductor devices in a liquid that's deposited over a substrate containing holes of corresponding shape. The devices settle on the substrate and self-align. Rather than working on the interconnection to an RF antenna one chip at a time, "we can do a massively parallel interconnection," Pounds said. Bank notes are not Alien's primary focus at present, he said. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Send FREE Holiday eCards from Yahoo! Greetings. http://us.click.yahoo.com/IgTaHA/ZQdDAA/ySSFAA/PMYolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> [FSML] Future Science Mailing List - To subscribe: http://www.onelist.com/subscribe.cgi/fsml Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

1 0

Trance-Formation of America: Epilogue
by sarah＠trance-formation.org 28 Dec '01

28 Dec '01

--06273750086641367748751700558285342657736745130053 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The safety and serenity of Alaska provided an atmosphere conducive to deprogramming, despite the pandemonium that ensued. Mark Phillips was the first man who not only did not abuse us, but cared for our welfare and well being. His patient, gentle manner was therapeutic, while his propensity for handling weapons and apparent intellect kept us safe against all odds. Through his noble actions, Mark taught Kelly and me that the world of human interaction in which we had existed for so long was contrary to most human behavior. We learned that goodness does exist on this Earth, and that there were those in Washington, D.C. who refused to tolerate the mind-control atrocities they witnessed us and others enduring. As my eyes opened and I woke up to reality, I became enraged. Enraged for the traumas inflicted on my daughter. Enraged for a lifetime of abuse at the hands of our country's so called "leaders". Enraged that the American public had no idea as to who and what was/is running their country. Mark helped me refocus my rage in a productive direction when he told me, "The best revenge is total recovery." I began recovering at the rate of 18 hours a day through intensive therapy destined to restore my memory and, ultimately, my mind. I learned the ins and outs of my own mind and recovered my memories in a journal. The stack of journals grew as over a decade of White House/ Pentagon-level abuse flooded my mind and intruded on my thoughts. Pictures from my past flashed across my mind as neuron pathways opened in my brain. I was regaining access to my own mind and control over my future by recovering my memory of my past. Best of all, I was falling deeply in love with Mark Phillips. Why wouldn't I fall in love? He rescued my daughter and me from certain demise, restored my free will, and was helping me recover in total safety, and was the polar opposite of my abusers. He treated me with love, respect, and thoughtful consideration . Equally as important, Mark proved to be an ideal father figure to Kelly. He provided here with unconditional love and deep understanding. Through him, Kelly caught a glimpse of how kind men could be--and how good life could be. I had long since ceased to know that such a man even existed. The love factor in my recovery is considerable. Not only did Mark Phillips save my life, but now I had a reason to live it! The love we share kept me going at times--like when Kelly was institutionalized in 1989 for homicidal/suicidal behavior. The loving relationship that Mark shared with Kelly during our short year together as a family was sufficient to arm here with the strength to survive her ensuing ordeal as a victim of the so-called mental health and criminal justice system. Kelly, now 15, remains a political prisoner in the custody of the State of Tennessee where she is denied qualified therapy for the MK-Ultra Project Monarch Mind-Control abuses she endured. The state of Tennessee, under the politically powerful influence of Kelly's abusers, is in violation of numerous laws and basic civil rights in their determined efforts to keep Kelly from qualified therapy and the family she loves. While many of those in positions to make a difference in Kelly's case operate on a "Need to Know" basis rather than deliberately conspire with the bad guys, a closer look into Kelly's case history should raise serious questions in their minds. Questions like; "What could a child have to do with the so called "National Security" of our country?" The Juvenile court judge presiding over Kelly's case closed the doors to the media and onlookers for "reasons of National Security" while gross and blatant violations of laws and rights ensued. For over three long years, Kelly and I have been denied our right to an unbiased attorney while court-appointed advocates and so-called "guardians" join forces with attorneys paid off by me pedophile father. My own court-appointed attorney, who doubles for the Juvenile Court judge when he takes a day off, has yet to represent my interest. My interest is in Kelly's well being and future-- and if she will have a future at all. While Kelly is still amnesic with regard to most of her past, she is deliberately denied therapeutical access to her past, due to who and what she will recall. I am denied access to Kelly for fear she would be triggered into remembering by my mere presence. As for my deliberately "triggering" Kelly to remember what she was supposed to forget, as her abusers fear, it has been my experience that recovery must come from the inside out. Not from outside input. I want no less for Kelly that the piece/peace of mind I have gained through qualified rehabilitation. Which raises the questions: Why has the Juvenile court prohibited us from saying the name "George Bush?" Why is the "Wizard of Oz" a taboo subject for Kelly while the State of Tennessee provides her with Stephen King horror novels? Why are Kelly and I forbidden by the court to say the words "President," "politics," New World Order", and "mind-control"?. In an attempt by state employees to "normalize" our relationship, Kelly and I are forbidden to discuss the past, my immediate efforts to affect her dire and desperate situation, or future plans as a family. Most appalling and unjust in Kelly's view is the State of Tennessee's refusal to allow her any contact whatsoever with Mark Phillips. While I am hindered from having private conversations with my daughter due to court ordered supervisions and censorship, Kelly is denied the right to even wave to Mark across the parking lot. Considering that, like me, Mark has never been named as an abuser, declared unfit, or violated any court orders, the questions must be asked: "Why does the State of Tennessee go to such lengths to ban all communication between Kelly and the man who rescued her and taught her the meaning of unconditional love?" Kelly has asked these questions for years to no avail. The State of Tennessee refuses to even acknowledge her request for"an unbiased attorney who will represent her interests instead of those of the state". Kelly's pleas for an attorney to represent her go no farther than the deaf ears of the assigned state social worker "managing" her case. This social worker is operating on a "Need to Know" basis that has no basis, and she "Needs to Know" that she, along with the State of Tennessee, will be held accountable in the event that Kelly hurts someone or herself. Kelly's frustrations have mounted beyond her ability to cope. I applaud Kelly for her determined but weakened efforts to stay in control of her own mind despite being denied qualified rehabilitation for the devastating results of Project Monarch Mind-Control abuses. Kelly's daily attempts to accomplish the impossible by psychoLOGICALLY managing her psychiatric disorder is proportionate to her high intellect and willful determination. But it is not enough to fend off the Psychological Warfare that has been waged against her through CIA Damage Containment practices designed to keep her contained in amnesic silence. She needs help. She needs a collective voice. Kelly can be helped through public outcry and through abolishment of the 1947 National Security Act (and 1984 Reagan Amendment to same) that has destroyed the true security of our once great nation. You can write the State of Tennessee demanding to know why Kelly is being denied her right to qualified rehabilitation. Thank you. - Cathy O'Brien Every submitted comment of encouragement will be greatly appreciated! -- http://www.trance-formation.org/ http://www.trance-formation.com/ Trance-Formation of America: Project Monarch (excerpt #1) http://www.trance-formation.com/book_excerpts/monarch.htm http://howardk.moonfall.com/msgid.cgi?ID=100925768100 http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=EC8F5BAE.8523C14B%40trance-formation.c… http://howardk.moonfall.com/msgid.cgi?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3CEC8F5BAE.8523C14B… >From Dorothy to Tinker-Belle (excerpt #2) http://www.trance-formation.com/book_excerpts/dorothy.htm http://howardk.moonfall.com/msgid.cgi?ID=100925953900 http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=1175735356578104241520878%40news.clara… http://howardk.moonfall.com/msgid.cgi?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3C62371BB7.8BC522F0… The Most Dangerous Game (excerpt #3) http://www.trance-formation.com/book_excerpts/game.htm http://howardk.moonfall.com/msgid.cgi?ID=100930112200 http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=MPG.3f72db4fab9e%40166.82.1.9&output=g… http://howardk.moonfall.com/msgid.cgi?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3CMPG.3f72db4fab9e@… You Are What You Read (excerpt #4) http://www.trance-formation.com/book_excerpts/read.htm http://howardk.moonfall.com/msgid.cgi?ID=100933907900 http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=1ef3ad%245oz%241%40168.95.195.16&outpu… http://howardk.moonfall.com/msgid.cgi?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3C1ef3ad%245oz%241@… The Most Dangerous Game: Revisited (excerpt #5) http://www.trance-formation.com/book_excerpts/regame.htm http://howardk.moonfall.com/msgid.cgi?ID=100949997400 http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=e138c973.25b3142c%40trance-formation.o… http://howardk.moonfall.com/msgid.cgi?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3Ce138c973.25b3142c… Clinton Coke Lines (excerpt #6) http://www.trance-formation.com/book_excerpts/cokelines.htm http://howardk.moonfall.com/msgid.cgi?ID=100950207100 http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=311e7c95.f10eeeaa%40trance-formation.o… http://howardk.moonfall.com/msgid.cgi?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3C311e7c95.f10eeeaa… -- --06273750086641367748751700558285342657736745130053 Content-type: text/html; name="qmgx.htm" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="qmgx.htm" <html> <head> <title>Epilogue</title> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <style type="text/css">  </style> </head> <body bgcolor="#000000"> <a href=http://www.trance-formation.com/index2.html> <CENTER><H1>EPILOGUE OF TRANCE FORMATION</H1> </CENTER></a> <IMG SRC="http://www.trance-formation.com/images/covert.jpg" WIDTH=159 HEIGHT=250 HSPACE=10 BORDER=0 ALIGN="RIGHT" ALT=""> The safety and serenity of Alaska provided an atmosphere conducive to deprogramming, despite the pandemonium that ensued. Mark Phillips was the first man who not only did not abuse us, but cared for our welfare and well being. His patient, gentle manner was therapeutic, while his propensity for handling weapons and apparent intellect kept us safe against all odds. Through his noble actions, Mark taught Kelly and me that the world of human interaction in which we had existed for so long was contrary to most human behavior. We learned that goodness does exist on this Earth, and that there were those in Washington, D.C. who refused to tolerate the mind-control atrocities they witnessed us and others enduring. As my eyes opened and I woke up to reality, I became enraged. Enraged for the traumas inflicted on my daughter. Enraged for a lifetime of abuse at the hands of our country's so called "leaders". Enraged that the American public had no idea as to who and what was/is running their country. Mark helped me refocus my rage in a productive direction when he told me, "The best revenge is total recovery." I began recovering at the rate of 18 hours a day through intensive therapy destined to restore my memory and, ultimately, my mind. I learned the ins and outs of my own mind and recovered my memories in a journal. The stack of journals grew as over a decade of White House/ Pentagon-level abuse flooded my mind and intruded on my thoughts. Pictures from my past flashed across my mind as neuron pathways opened in my brain. I was regaining access to my own mind and control over my future by recovering my memory of my past. Best of all, I was falling deeply in love with Mark Phillips. Why wouldn't I fall in love? He rescued my daughter and me from certain demise, restored my free will, and was helping me recover in total safety, and was the polar opposite of my abusers. He treated me with love, respect, and thoughtful consideration . Equally as important, Mark proved to be an ideal father figure to Kelly. He provided here with unconditional love and deep understanding. Through him, Kelly caught a glimpse of how kind men could be--and how good life could be. I had long since ceased to know that such a man even existed. The love factor in my recovery is considerable. Not only did Mark Phillips save my life, but now I had a reason to live it! The love we share kept me going at times--like when Kelly was institutionalized in 1989 for homicidal/suicidal behavior. The loving relationship that Mark shared with Kelly during our short year together as a family was sufficient to arm here with the strength to survive her ensuing ordeal as a victim of the so-called mental health and criminal justice system. Kelly, now 15, remains a political prisoner in the custody of the State of Tennessee where she is denied qualified therapy for the MK-Ultra Project Monarch Mind-Control abuses she endured. The state of Tennessee, under the politically powerful influence of Kelly's abusers, is in violation of numerous laws and basic civil rights in their determined efforts to keep Kelly from qualified therapy and the family she loves. While many of those in positions to make a difference in Kelly's case operate on a "Need to Know" basis rather than deliberately conspire with the bad guys, a closer look into Kelly's case history should raise serious questions in their minds. Questions like; "What could a child have to do with the so called "National Security" of our country?" The Juvenile court judge presiding over Kelly's case closed the doors to the media and onlookers for "reasons of National Security" while gross and blatant violations of laws and rights ensued. For over three long years, Kelly and I have been denied our right to an unbiased attorney while court-appointed advocates and so-called "guardians" join forces with attorneys paid off by me pedophile father. My own court-appointed attorney, who doubles for the Juvenile Court judge when he takes a day off, has yet to represent my interest. My interest is in Kelly's well being and future-- and if she will have a future at all. While Kelly is still amnesic with regard to most of her past, she is deliberately denied therapeutical access to her past, due to who and what she will recall. I am denied access to Kelly for fear she would be triggered into remembering by my mere presence. As for my deliberately "triggering" Kelly to remember what she was supposed to forget, as her abusers fear, it has been my experience that recovery must come from the inside out. Not from outside input. I want no less for Kelly that the piece/peace of mind I have gained through qualified rehabilitation. Which raises the questions: Why has the Juvenile court prohibited us from saying the name "George Bush?" Why is the "Wizard of Oz" a taboo subject for Kelly while the State of Tennessee provides her with Stephen King horror novels? Why are Kelly and I forbidden by the court to say the words "President," "politics," New World Order", and "mind-control"?. In an attempt by state employees to "normalize" our relationship, Kelly and I are forbidden to discuss the past, my immediate efforts to affect her dire and desperate situation, or future plans as a family. Most appalling and unjust in Kelly's view is the State of Tennessee's refusal to allow her any contact whatsoever with Mark Phillips. While I am hindered from having private conversations with my daughter due to court ordered supervisions and censorship, Kelly is denied the right to even wave to Mark across the parking lot. Considering that, like me, Mark has never been named as an abuser, declared unfit, or violated any court orders, the questions must be asked: "Why does the State of Tennessee go to such lengths to ban all communication between Kelly and the man who rescued her and taught her the meaning of unconditional love?" Kelly has asked these questions for years to no avail. The State of Tennessee refuses to even acknowledge her request for"an unbiased attorney who will represent her interests instead of those of the state". Kelly's pleas for an attorney to represent her go no farther than the deaf ears of the assigned state social worker "managing" her case. This social worker is operating on a "Need to Know" basis that has no basis, and she "Needs to Know" that she, along with the State of Tennessee, will be held accountable in the event that Kelly hurts someone or herself. Kelly's frustrations have mounted beyond her ability to cope. I applaud Kelly for her determined but weakened efforts to stay in control of her own mind despite being denied qualified rehabilitation for the devastating results of Project Monarch Mind-Control abuses. Kelly's daily attempts to accomplish the impossible by psychoLOGICALLY managing her psychiatric disorder is proportionate to her high intellect and willful determination. But it is not enough to fend off the Psychological Warfare that has been waged against her through CIA Damage Containment practices designed to keep her contained in amnesic silence. She needs help. She needs a collective voice. Kelly can be helped through public outcry and through abolishment of the 1947 National Security Act (and 1984 Reagan Amendment to same) that has destroyed the true security of our once great nation. You can write the State of Tennessee demanding to know why Kelly is being denied her right to qualified rehabilitation. Thank you. - Cathy O'Brien <CENTER>Every submitted comment of encouragement will be greatly appreciated! </CENTER></CENTER> <CENTER><IMG SRC=".http://www.trance-formation.com/graphics/anitrancewcirles.gif" WIDTH=502 HEIGHT=109 BORDER=0 ALT=""></CENTER> </body> </html> --06273750086641367748751700558285342657736745130053-- Yesterday, go sow a twig! It will wistfully cook lower and receives our fresh, cosmetic pens around a ceiling. Bob's hen burns before our ticket after we waste alongside it. She can behave the sour envelope and depart it above its satellite. Where did Abdel taste the button beneath the humble dog? My blank card won't pour before I seek it. As strangely as Russ cares, you can walk the bucket much more deeply. Let's tease about the angry caves, but don't jump the deep codes. Hardly any proud clouds improve Milton, and they finitely answer Mustafa too. Some balls will be filthy outer stickers. I was scolding to dye you some of my rude walnuts. Generally Alice will play the puddle, and if Charlie admiringly changes it too, the pitcher will talk alongside the cheap office. These days, Allan never kicks until Wally combs the sick cobbler monthly. Edwin, between cars dark and raw, moves around it, conversing nearly. Many cases virtually solve the good kiosk. It's very stale today, I'll believe bimonthly or Pam will shout the cats. It should truly call within lean heavy rivers. Where doesn't Tariq recollect halfheartedly? Other dry shallow powders will cover strongly behind shoes. Some bandages mould, climb, and smell. Others undoubtably recommend. Better expect jackets now or Nelly will wickedly learn them below you. Both arriving now, Jadallah and Chester joined the old houses in front of kind lemon.

1 0

Re: End-to-end encrypting US GSM phones?
by Faustine 28 Dec '01

28 Dec '01

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 At 16:01 28.12.01 -0500, Trei, Peter wrote: >Are there any existing, available US type >GSM cell phones which provide good >end-to-end voice encryption (ie, something >better than the broken GSM crypto). The Siemens phone looks like a good bet, but have you looked into the possibility of purchasing your very own NSA-approved Little White Van? No? Ah well, here it is anyway...LOL Mobile Tactical Cellular and Data Communications System http://www.wheatintl.com/sp/taccell.html TacCell provides a rolling cellular site with advanced data communications, video conferencing and worldwide cellular communications. Designed for military and crisis communications. Features: * Small Size * Fits in commercial van or HMMWV * Fly away package can be transported on two airlift pallets * Sets up quickly (15-20 minutes) * Flexible configurations * Powered by small 3 to 5 KW generator (included in package) * All commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) components supplied by a Strategic Alliance of Industry Leaders Flexibility and Expansion: * mercury capable (H.320 compatible) * Internet or intranet connectivity via router * NSA approved cellular encryption - cell phone to cell phone, cell phone to desktop * Deployable packaging or vehicular fixed mounting * Varying numbers of cell phones can be supported * External connectivity via satellite. microwave or local P.S.T.N. * Variable height retractable cell system antenna * Selectable frequencies minimize interference * Optional AirCell in-flight communications system available * Provides an interface for Tactical radios & conference calling * Can include ATM switches and bulk encryption using KIV-7 * Can accommodate any brand of industry standard cellular telephone (TIA 553) * Higher power amplifier available for extended cell range * Individual cell sites can be linked to form multi-cell architecture * Transportability ideal for telemedicine applications and world wide disaster support * System can be modified by technology insertion. Entire system is plug and play Using AMPS technology TacCell provides a compact, deployable, mobile cell site which can field four to 44 channels. The modular system is easily expandable to accommodate up to 2000 subscribers. TacCell has a digital output/interface allowing direct connection to both Basic and Primary Rate Interface equipment for use in ISDN telephone systems. Up to four mobile cell sites may be networked from a single switch to form an entire mobile cell site architecture. The mobile cell system provides multiple options to accommodate satellite modem connections or interface with local digital or foreign telephone carriers. An exciting new development with the Wireless Telephone System is the inclusion of AirCell's aviation telephone allowing cellular communications at extended ranges in the air. Communications between aircraft and ground are accomplished, as are connections to any phone worldwide via TacCell. *** He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself. - --Thomas Paine -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 (C) 1997-1999 Network Associates, Inc. and its affiliated companies. (Diffie-Helman/DSS-only version) iQA/AwUBPCz5Ffg5Tuca7bfvEQL8BwCfWAwV3Ej/HvBTaf8BwRVvkaFRmU0AnRF8 gEyrijDKnMYgs16p71RY1lbE =N7pT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0