January 2001 - cypherpunks-legacy

Reminder... Mac Crypto Jan 29th - Feb 1st
by Bill Stewart 02 Jan '01

02 Jan '01

RAH isn't forwarding to Cypherpunks at the moment --- begin forwarded text

1 0

(no subject)
by GWAUGUSTADR 01 Jan '01

01 Jan '01

Gary and Jill WaltersWE ARE IN RECIEPT OF INFORMATION ON WARREN ANDERSON. WE HAVE THE TOP AMERICAN ASTONAOGHTS CAPABLE OF BRINGING THE MIR DOWN. WE ARE IN CONTACT WITH THE RUSSIANS NOW, IF YOU CAN PUT US IN TOUCH WITH HIM RIGHT AWAY TIME IS OF ESSEINCE. OUR GOAL WOULD BE TO HAVE THE RUSSIANS REBOOST THE MIR INTO A 3 YEAR ORBIT ACCORDING TO CAMANDER DAVID SCOTT THE APPOLLO CAMANDER AND OUR SCIENTIST HAVE A WAY OF SLINNKY WRAP PROJECT TO BRING MIR DOWN AND DISPLAY IT IN AN INTERNATIONAL SPAC AND TECHNOLOGY THEME PARK. SYMBOL RAMO, IS CURRENTLY DEVELOPEING AN ACQUSITION TO ASSIST VANGUARD SPACE TECHNOLOGY AND INTERNATIONAL SPACE TECHNOLOGY, WITH AN UNDERWRITING THIS YEARS LAUNCH PROGRAMS FOR SATAELITE RECOVERY. WE AT RAMO ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THE ONLY PRIVATE GROUP CAPABLE OF DOING THIS TYPE OF RECOVERY IN THE INTIRE WORLD. ALL TOP NOTCH SCIENTISTS, SPACE CAMMANDERS, FORMER SPACE COMMAND CENTER DIRECTORS, SECURITY SPACE DIRECTOR MISSION READY INSURANCE COMPANIES ALREADY IN PLACE ETC, PLEASE RESPOND ASAP. TELEPHONE # 7027327385 OR 702 2018581OR EMAIL

1 0

Information on your website
by marketing＠netoneplus.com 01 Jan '01

01 Jan '01

1 0

(no subject)
by thomasstern 01 Jan '01

01 Jan '01

I have over 100 properties am looking to trade or swap or exchange most of them are single family homes and some are commerical and they are located in Lubbock, Texas will be willing to look at anything and they are all free and clear with no leins they are excellent for 1031 exchanges please feel free to call at 806-797-6481 or email for list Thankyou Thomas Stern

1 0

World in 2015
by Jim Choate 01 Jan '01

01 Jan '01

You should check out the CIA article on Drudge... ____________________________________________________________________ Before a larger group can see the virtue of an idea, a smaller group must first understand it. "Stranger Suns" George Zebrowski The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage(a)ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

None
by thomasstern 01 Jan '01

01 Jan '01

I have over 100 properties am looking to trade or swap or exchange most of them are single family homes and some are commerical and they are located in Lubbock, Texas will be willing to look at anything and they are all free and clear with no leins they are excellent for 1031 exchanges please feel free to call at 806-797-6481 or email for list Thankyou Thomas Stern

1 0

(no subject)
by thomasstern 01 Jan '01

01 Jan '01

I have over 100 properties am looking to trade or swap or exchange most of them are single family homes and some are commerical and they are located in Lubbock, Texas will be willing to look at anything and they are all free and clear with no leins they are excellent for 1031 exchanges please feel free to call at 806-797-6481 or email for list Thankyou Thomas Stern

1 0

ASCII Ribbon Campaign... [was Re: This is why a free society is evil.]
by Anonymous 01 Jan '01

01 Jan '01

http://www.google.com/search?q=ascii+ribbon+campaign ymmv, C.G. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim May" <tcmay(a)got.net> To: <cypherpunks(a)einstein.ssz.com> Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2000 1:48 PM Subject: Re: CDR: Re: This is why a free society is evil. (fwd) > At 10:57 AM -0700 12/17/00, Tiarnan O Corrain wrote: > >Attachment converted: G4 Tower HD:Re- CDR- Re- This is why a free > >(MiME/CSOm) (00012800) > > > Please in-line your text. > > Your message above appears as an attachment (only, not just a digital > signature). Sometimes Eudora Pro, a common e-mail program, is able to > open such messages, sometimes not. In your particular case, for > whatever reasons, attempting to open your attachment crashes my > program. I tried three times, then gave up. > > Folks, this increase in MIME attachments is getting out of hand. > People are reading this list on a variety of machines, from PDAs to > Amigas to VT100s to Unix boxes to Windows. > > I am filtering Corrain's stuff into my trash file until someone > (else) tells me his stuff is no longer MIME-encrusted. > > > --Tim May > -- > Timothy C. May tcmay(a)got.net Corralitos, California > Political: Co-founder Cypherpunks/crypto anarchy/Cyphernomicon > Technical: physics/soft errors/Smalltalk/Squeak/agents/games/Go > Personal: b.1951/UCSB/Intel '74-'86/retired/investor/motorcycles/guns >

1 0

(no subject)
by Anonymous 01 Jan '01

01 Jan '01

-- ignore --

1 0

Re: The problem with SSH2
by Jim Choate 01 Jan '01

01 Jan '01

On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Markus Friedl wrote: > On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 06:30:01PM +0000, Peter Fairbrother wrote: > > Why not use a communication method that makes MITM attacks impossible to > > successfully complete? Doesn't that "not expose them to risk at all"? > > as Damien wrote: SSH2 + pk auth 'makes MITM attacks impossible to > successfully complete'. 'pk auth' is handwaving. How do you defeat the MITM attack against the key server this approach requires? You don't, at some point there is a question of nothing but 'trust'. And it isn't testable. This is the fundamental weakness any any security scheme that requires anything approaching public pk distribution. The original point that what is needed is a distributed system with no interest in message content is still valid. Then the parties using the system can impliment the appropriate security for their purposes. Any central server based system should be avoided. Any system that pre-dictates the low-level format (ie non-delivery related) should be avoided like the plague. Any system that requires single source (prefer Open Source or PD) tools should be avoided like the black plague. What we really need is a distributed network/process model (ala Plan 9) that impliments content encryption at all levels, though 'next level' addressing should still be in the clear. Key management at the network layer should be node-to-node (peer-to-peer) and left to the discression of the individual parties. We accept that we need trust in our model and distirbute it to the lowest level as well. This limits any breach of security without massive amounts of resources, which limits the targets of such attacks to reasonably readily identifiable, and as a result protected, lists. Then using a distributed file system we can break the actual contents up and store them 'holographically' (this probably means multi-site storage for each little blob of a target file) so small amounts of sites dropping off are irrelevant to the integrity of the file system. At that point with some sort of 'anonymous thunking layer' (eg standard anonymous remailer, posts through Usenet, or anonymous IP proxies) we can impliment a 'data haven' sort of mechanism. This effectively means I can access my 'home workspace' from anywhere on the Internet anonymously and transparently (with respect to resource usage). As an aside, this sort of architecture would also solve a lot of the wireless issues as well. ____________________________________________________________________ Before a larger group can see the virtue of an idea, a smaller group must first understand it. "Stranger Suns" George Zebrowski The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage(a)ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------

2 1