--- overview ---
a previous example of subjective mathematics was given related to how the
calculation 5 x 2 could occur across a range of 7 through 9, if the decimal
place was unaccounted for yet still existed in a hidden computation. using
exponentials this range can be further demonstrated, and with enough
mathematical know-how potentially any whole number sum could be produced
5^.1 + 2^.1 = 2
5^2 + 2^2 = 29
5^3 + 2^3 = 133
this indicates that what is outside the boundary of consideration could
also have some effect on what is occurring inside of it, depending upon how
it is modeled and how the data is accounted for or may exist without such
evaluation or could have ambiguities or anomalies built-into it, which can
be exploited to produce alternative results in another hidden framework
[5] + [2] = [2|29|133]
in other words, this 'extra information' exists beyond the boundary of the
numbers 5 and 2, such that for example...
[5]^2 + [2]^2 = 29
if only accounting for what is inside the boundary, the result is obvious:
[5] + [2] = 7
and thus the sum could actually be variable, even while 'limited', which
could be an issue of ~appearance or a facade calculation that obscures
other processing that could be occurring simultaneously.
[5] + [2] = [sum]
in other words, depending upon how the calculation is observed, reviewed,
and evaluated, extra information or details could exist beyond a threshold
that hides relevant data about the calculation taking place, allowing two
or more calculations to occur simultaneously. thus if only whole numbers
are accounted for and yet there are floating decimal point operations and
fractions involved or rounding, these could be areas for exploits or holes.
the skewed ideological nature of relativism is such, that 2+2 could be said
to sum up to 2.3, given an authority based viewpoint...
[2]^.1 + [2]^.3= [2.3]
and therefore if a student were to say 2+2=4, this could be denied because
it is not the same framework a given privileged perspective uses, which
then all must use to pass their 'subjective mathematics' course, a great
many ~theory-based University professors relying on these tactics.
therefore 2 + 2 = 2.3 could be standardized as a viewpoint and function
outside of other checks and balances and simply be declared true, because
the calculation can be made, even while its 'extra information' may not be
accounted for within the shared situation itself, and instead become the
dogmatic assumption required so as to obtain the only correct answer.
[2] + [2] = 2.3 // CORRECT
[2] + [2] = 4 // INCORRECT
addressing the extra information could be made off-limits yet still be used
and required to obtain the given result, and thus by default the actual
non-tainted calculation can be ruled 'out of bounds' for not acknowledging
or ceding to the default biased assumption, which skews the calculation.
[pT] + [pT] = [range of pT]
[T] + [T] = [empirical truth]
it really matters where the boundaries are drawn and how they are accounted
for, because it would be wrong to assume 2 + 2 = 2.3 without recognizing
the role of exponential power in altering the whole number values. in this
way, what is false can be equated with what is true, yet only because it is
not resolving anomalies into a truth-only framework, and it is this leeway
or skew, warping, distortion, and bias that can force false perspectives
in this same way, computer modeling of society and issues of surveillance,
where 'terror' may be mapped onto citizens en masse, via criteria that are
beyond actual accounting or oversight -- if not due to issues of language
and psychology that are allowed given a privatized corrupted worldview via
the broken US Constitution, allowing private man to manipulate events in
that finite, limited framework so it firstly benefits male-male historical
relations. what if, for instance, a cabal developed whereby by privilege of
this viewpoint, e.g. a hostile homosexual male point of view was the
grounding of the surveillance state, and its associated politics as this
relates to harassment of citizens or being blacklisted or even denied
healthcare. that is the same issue of accountability and boundaries and how
moving goalposts allows these types of abuses to exist within the system
and systematically become the basis for oppressive institutionalized
behavior. and thus, in the above example, what if sexual harassment were to
occur via surveillance in that peculiar context- that the private male-gaze
of the state is trying to out a citizen, and that type of extra data
involved in calculations. it is perhaps absurd, though perhaps not, if
unregulated and unaccounted for.
the larger issue being that computer models can likewise be bounded and
allow ~privileged ("royal") interpretations that are ungrounded or skewed
by default of not accounting for binary biasing, subjective (A=B)
evalautions, and relativistic framework that operate only or primarily in
pseudo-truth and its evershifty onesided "reasoning" er ~processing, which
can brute force a resulting false perspective that is presupposed to be
shared by all because it can be thought and believed to exist, by fiat of
everyday SIGN-BASED "computation" that is essentially saying: i see, i say,
i believe myself. and this extends into: we agree, we believe, this is
shared reality.
the problem with this situation is life and reality are more complicated
than this simplistic framework and yet if error-correction is not allowed
or views outside the particular boundary or that question it are silenced,
then it is a self-sustaining bubble environment of close-minded believers
in a particular finite view of partial truth that is equated with universal
truth, such that pT=T. yet also, a particular individual viewpoint takes
precedent over all the others that have better information or do not rely
on errors, which instead can just be ignored and denied as 'less than'.
individual.pT > group.T
the way this should ideally work is that the empirical truth of humanity
would error-check and correct the individual partial truth, yet if the
individual POV is ruling over humans, then it becomes 'the law' by way of
power, 'the truth', albeit virtual, ungrounded, disconnected from reality.
individual.T > group.pT
the way democracy should work is that this feedback of individual viewpoint
into the larger empirical framework should be embraced, welcomed and not
shutdown by censorship or other means, yet this is instead what occurs in
educational institutions and society at large via conformist 'true belief'.
dictator.pT > citizens.T
in this way, state cyberattacks against citizens could break equipment to
force silence and enforce ideological boundaries, to make sure feedback
cannot occur which challenges the ruling viewpoint, even though warped and
reliant upon errors, false beliefs and incorrect assumptions
dictator.power > citizens.truth (empirical)
the idea then of accountability is that this process is reversed and held
to account in a legal framework of constitutional law, else it is denied
and the functioning state is illegal, beyond law, exploiting its citizens
dictator.power < citizens.truth
private.POV.pT < public.TRUTH
relativistic.pT < empirical.TRUTH
so a situation in a failed state could devolve to the point that a private
police state is on the offensive against the public human state...
private.police-state > public.human.state
and this very situation can likewise be reversed...
private.police-state < public.human.state
thus, in terms of mass surveillance these various categories and boundaries
can help shape the policies or lack of oversight or incapacity to reason
about what is occurring in the terms it occurring within, due to illiteracy
which may be inherent though also enforced, via silencing, censorship, and
blacklisting and destruction of other viewpoints that challenge and seek to
change the false perspective to a more accurate, accountable shared view
private.mass.surveillance > human citizenry
private.warped.politics.pT > human.TRUTH
relativistic.power.pT > empirical.TRUTH
evil.rogue.state.pT > human.state.TRUTH
in this condition there is code, signage, language and algoritms, numbers
flowing through equations said or believed to /represent/ the situation and
peoples interests, yet what [people], how is this defined and accounted for
and to what degree is this false, based on the surrounding evidence of a
despoiled environment and broken civilization, from minds to products to
institutions to ideas, a total and complete manufacturing of failure, and
thus the centrality of the role of ILLITERACY in allowing and enabling this
status quo, basically by going along with the existing outdated paradigm,
incrementally improving upon ungrounded and biased assumptions, and so-on
the big picture idea is that you would not want to limit or censor or skew
or force a perspective upon reality that is inaccurate or limiting or false
as that would bound what can be known and interpreted, yet this subversion
could occur in a state computing or other scenario, such as with quantum
all-seeing distributed networked supercomputing whereby 'the ambiguity' is
forced into a narrow ideological framework and cherry-picked to get results
or supporting data that allows actions to be justified via these corrupted
models-- corrupted in their relation with ideas, the observation of signs
as if 'the reality' versus referencing it elsewhere, conduits not
things-in-themselves. such a confusion or idiocy could lead to citizens
being perceived and treated as if potential terrorists, by default of a too
limited onesided evaluation of the data, and its forced binarization into
the same old relativistic private gaming that constitution 'history' allows
the danger is that this is the *default* condition, the rules organizing
and quasi-governing systems, the capacity to legitimize this activity via
'biased processing' of binary ideologues which force privatized reasoning
into these false and error-ridden frameworks as if 'universal truth' by the
very declaration of a shared perspective and denial of any other evidence
that does not fit the model or challenges it or inconveniences that view,
and this situation has been normalized, equated with 'public agenda' even
and therefore the oppression exist within minds, and interpretations and
this involves illiteracy if not malice and mendacity to the human project
and its existing outside-the-lines is how it is allowed to continue, for
the parallel activity is not being accounted for in the calculations, it
can be sidestepped, and in doing so, takes on all the force of law-- as
language, ungrounded sign-based communication substituted for truth itself.
this then enshrined in technology, the operating system of the rogue state,
and in individuals and society via institutional and mass media programming
such that behavioral compliance is the first and ultimately the only choice
(this possible because "logic" has been removed from calculations and thus
the biased subjectivity of A=B observations the basis for such politics,
uncorrected and uncorrectable relativism is the carte blanche powerplay)
--- literacy and observation ---
so rationalization can be in error and this is proposed the default
situation with the flawed frameworks that exist that society malfunctions
within, most especially issues of money and [economics], which relies so
extremely on privately skewed pseudo-truth that it is the antithesis of the
principle of economy, and yet unaccountable to this empirical reasoning.
the rationalization of a finite viewpoint, a partial infinitesimal slice of
larger situation by a particular observer/s and framework, then can reduce
via CENSORSHIP what data is inside the model and held outside its boundary
while also including other hidden data that remains unaccounted for, as
bias and skew and warping and distortion, that is unable to be calculated
in terms outside the perspective. it is disallowed, becomes faith-based,
and an answered question- institutionalized. "this is true because it is
good for us, etc. "if you do not accept our truth you are bad for us, etc.
this reductionism is tied to a limited rationalization, which is based on
observations by people who agree or share a particular framework or view,
yet this is not inherently grounded and removed of falsity- instead it is
inherently pseudo-truth and reliant on errors biasing and warped beliefs
until corrected, removed of these-- which is where the societal
short-circuiting occurs, the lack of any need or requirement to do this
outside of a private framework and belief system or private POV or ID. say
sex or gender or demographics or political party. there is no requirement
to acknowledge 'truth' existing outside this private boundary, as per the
US Constitution (!) and therefore, this choosing-truth becomes a RIGHT of
private citizens, and this collapses a larger shared public framework by
dividing and subdividing again and again across every issue and viewpoint
until there is no shared perspective for issues -- only infantile babbling
(this in a context of the internet as global adolescent playpen, likewise)
so in this devolved condition, an unnatural state of illiteracy exists
where the 'common framework' cannot be allowed or established, either by
hostilities of others, including the state, manifested by private attacks
via representatives of its ideology or by official state action itself,
else the incapacity of people to communicate in empirical terms about the
situation that exists, removed of biasing or boundaries and thresholds that
create exceptions to everything outside a given viewpoint, which can either
be incapable of acknowledging what exists to retain equilibrium in existing
conditions, or also has no shared framework to communicate within, for the
perspectives beyond a given specific limit. in that, the common structure
is absent from social relations, the education system built around this
division of thought and action, whereas what is needed is a generic or
generalist viewpoint that transcends the finite specialist awareness and
its limits to shared considerations within a given boundary. in other
words, the ability to communicate and understand -across boundaries- has
been lost in the very era when humanity is most connected by technological
tools and yet there is SILENCE about the issues that exist in the terms
they exist within, when instead the 'representative media estate' and its
failed role as representers of public will themselves have collapsed,
having no backbone for real questions, perhaps due to hidden dictatorship
and real-world consequences of going against the prevailing private agenda.
if people were able to logically reason beyond binary viewpoints the issues
that exist could be dealt with forthrightly in a constitutional context,
yet the very absence of this, due to forced illiteracy, prevents it. the
very educational system that is supposed to uphold ideals of such feedback
itself destroyed and disallowing viewpoints beyond the correct perspective
within classes and thus formatting minds and manners and relations this way
that results in total incapacitation of the population to deal with its own
situation in the state, which leaves corporate citizens the only competent
selfish actors ('virtual citizens'), legal entities which now basically are
representers of a portion of a privatized public viewpoint, those whose
careers align with the given agendas, whether health-care or high-tech or
privatized state and federal bureaucracy itself -- against the citizenry. a
cannibalistic exploitative self-defeating, oppressive ideological policy
that stands-in for polity in a mass mediated internet-is-TV surrealism,
everything moving lock-step in the same direction of a global wind-up
watch, whether it is realized or not- it is a gigantic automated machine,
and people are effectively and essentially enslaved, imprisoned within it
and by default function against one another via these insane dynamics,
unless accurately accounting for the situation beyond enronomic beliefs
"truth itself" is not being accessed simply by communicating viewpoints
within language, and yet this is the assumption that allows all this to
occur without correction. instead, truth must be secured. and thus if it is
trapped within ideology, that must be addressed, evaluated, transformed so
that it is not a hidden limit and that such warped dynamics are neutralized
and what is true can be freed from a constraining falsity. and to do this
requires logic that goes beyond the prevailing binary ideology that is at
this moment celebrated as a triumphant revelation of a friction-free life
in a future-world, a religious-like transcendent experience -- "if only you
fully and truly believe, then you can code your own reality, our reality"
-- and this is outright fucking false. idiotic. it is an absolute scam.
massive INSTITUTIONALIZED BULLSHIT. this is private religion that has taken
over the educational system in the form of underachieving technology and
associated 'agendas' that further inculcate the mindless drone roles for
populations, outlawing questions beyond the given limits and boundaries. it
is essentially an antihuman policy, removing human values, replacing these
with machine values for a class that exploits and benefits most from this
approach, yet remains hidden as a middle-managing elite. going along with
this situation, you survive. questioning it, you are removed from the
society, become a commodity, a natural resource, guinea pig, lab rat, etc.
relativistic 'literacy' allows this, as long as you share the POV you can
ignore the negatives and proceed and succeed within society, even though it
is costing you your humanity as well as the humanity of others, who likely
are heavily oppressed by the same activities some people need to survive,
while others deal with the ecological or social or economic impacts of the
few or some who survive at the expense of the many, including nature itself
in that greed has destroyed the environment and living systems to the point
that natural wealth has be obliterated via this same systematic processing
beyond the boundary, then. the price of clean air or water that is not
filled with chemicals. a world where breast milk is not laced with fire
retardant or psychiatric drugs. these issues do not get accounted for nor
are they corrected in the 'data processing' of civilization. it is instead
allowed to continue as a ~normalized situation, ad absurdum ad infiniti
so the issue of observation is directly tied to that of perspective, the
framework that defines the viewpoint, what the parameters are for the
observer and observation, and this conceptualization is critical yet also
is lacking as an awareness. society while highly visual still consists of
citizens without rudimentary skills for communicating ideas, especially in
terms of diagramming at the level of cave people about what is going on.
instead it is pushed into sign-based linear communication, versus a more
pure and basic evaluation of hypotheses and recurring models of questions
and situations that can be referenced again and again, versus writing a new
viewpoint over and over, rewriting, resaying, trillions of times over
the point being, the observer as an entity, a person or surveillance cam,
is not conceptualized in an accurate grounded way by default, and instead
relies upon a 'partial literacy' that is established in pseudo-truth, and
this ungrounded condition itself involves boundaries related to viewpoint
and ~perspective, limits to what is seen and unseen, what is allowed to
exist as parameters or not allowed, and this [variables] of observation
then are also involved in the issues they connect to and are reliant upon
thus, the surveillance camera that peers into the world is not by default
in a state of 'empirical truth' in terms of its operation, it is probable
it exists in a partial-truth (pT) that involves skew and distortion and
binary bias that influences its interpretation, and that this exists in a
private framework via constitutional law, that can allow boundaries to be
edited and crossed by its corrupted, relativistic (A=B) subjectivist POV,
whereby some private citizens may surveil others for political advantage
and there is nothing to stop this from proceeding in these same terms, if
there is a breakdown in the language itself needed to correct the errors,
because these issues are not calculated inside the box, instead they are
hidden, parallel computations that involve psychologies and agendas, the
realities of bullying behaviors of oppressors, the traits of domination
needing display by those believing themselves more powerful, to prove to
the oppressed their superiority via such aggression. it is an issue of
limits, just as with people who may 'keep out' views or beliefs or truth
they do not want to acknowledge because it negatively effects their own
version of events which best suits their particular private conditions
in other words, limits and boundaries and parameters are involved also in
'not seeing' and thus censoring what is seen or observed or related to, via
how this is calculated, processed, considered, and in what logical terms
thus, the surveillance camera can have a warped POV as it looks into the
surrounding world, it can be interpreting situations in skewed frameworks
that rely on errors or ignore facts and data and omit vital dynamics from
the models used to evaluate situations. and yet they stand in judgement as
do people, as if the action of observation is itself directly connected
with -absolute truth- by default, which allows lies to be structuralized,
beliefs to take over as understanding and shared awareness, the partialness
the realm of exploit, the area of failure in approach and understanding,
such that the ideology appears to be that "truth can be engineered", if not
via simply forcing a perspective that is shared by the masses as if reality
local and global, relative and empirical, many individual views of a larger
shared truth - yet what if it is only partial, and censored, or limited or
not calculated accurately and thus it does it not add, realistically, in
that what is said and is believed to represent the situation actually is
not capable of this, and in some sense, this representation is corrupted.
what if these limits and shared frameworks are based in errors if not lies
that are unaccountable to correction, even by ego-based beliefs such that
an observer views themselves as infallible, this narcissism, and that the
condition of relation is stuck in this broken dynamic and thus perspective
cannot get beyond it or outside the skew and instead relies upon it, this
to include organizations and ideological and individual belief systems, as
if the global population is to some extent viable, certifiably crazy. then
what? how do you get to shared observations in truth if the processing of
events is skewed and strange calculations are normalized and shared as the
collective abstraction, and yet this is inaccurate, untrue, false, bad even
what if this condition of partial literacy of specialists is nested within
a larger illiteracy of the shared condition, via set(subset) relations:
society (individual)
illiteracy (partial-literacy)
if people were to try to communicate, most likely it would need to occur
beyond their private boundary to get at what is going on -at scale- within
the larger society, yet these views could likewise be contained within a
warped, skewed relativistic framework of each person if ungrounded in
their views, such that their right is to censor or limit external truth,
even if partial, which then bounds this larger social connection to only
subset relations in a shared language or viewpoint. thus, "classes" or
shared sets of parameters that limit the macro-organism and prevent a
supraorganism from ever existing at the level of the state, everything
divided this way
--- what is literacy ---
vital basic knowledge and skills are missing from society today and this
limits what connections people can have and in what terms, and this is the
result of the way people are educated, in what frameworks and beliefs and
via what methods and curricula, skillsets and pedagogy, and relationships
literacy involves a human component and is assumed based within nature,
though exists in a context of technology that "interprets" environments.
most simply literacy seems to correspond with accurate observation and
awareness, such that what is perceived corresponds to what actually exists,
to some degree of fidelity, from partial to a more complete understanding
as this involves limits and boundaries of perception, modeling of ideas
thus if a person is near a bridge and they view a streetlamp, they may
recognize a streetlamp and correctly observe it, via pattern matching based
on previous experience. and perhaps they notice certain variables- that it
is a particular type of streetlamp, its color, height, material, and then
they are on to the next observation
and so there may be some inherence in the groundedness of such
observations in that, within particular limits- there could be empirical
truth that is relativistically evaluated and this could be accurate and
thus a basis for general observations could be considered 'literate' to
some bounded extent
another person could see the same streetlight in the context of a bridge
and notice the wildgrass and embankment it is situated within, could notice
the bugs and spiderwebs inside the glass case, know a little history of the
infrastructure, consider the aesthetics of the concrete bridge versus steel
or aluminum armature for the light, its brown color as camouflage to blend
into environments as this relates to infrastructure (green transformers as
if bushes, grey telephone switches as if rocks) and consider the poetry it
may involve under the existing cloud cover and melancholy mood, whereby in
its detached condition it is as if a statue watching over passersby, and
perhaps is imagined as silent witness to the same day in the same moment
a third person could exist who has access to all empirical knowledge of a
common data model, and thus when observing this same streetlight scene they
could access the history of the lighting type, the type of bridge span, the
name of the bolts visible, and reference the street lighting system to then
consider the name of the particular color of paint used on its surface, the
composition of the particular metal, what the names of nearby plants are,
the sound of a bird catalogued and identified to its specificity, and then
to review the history of concrete- that any such observation would map to
what is known about what is observed- whether by natural instance of the
distributed yet entangled empirical mind or via technological apparatus
that queries a database and then pattern matches against such parameters-
and in this example it would be proposed unlimited, to a certain boundary
that then is unknown or not yet modeled this way-- thus a threshold area
where questions exist and hypotheses are actively interpreting the data
the omniscient-like awareness of the third example is not different in its
truth from the first, which is proposed to correlate with A=A awareness.
though it may be more involved or function well beyond the particular
limits of observation of a given observer, based on what parameters can be
evaluated. someone who sees the paint and notices its color may do so to
some degree, yet another observer may match this to an actual color sample
and name via data query, or know of the molecular composition of the paint
and consider this in relation to that of the metal used in the streetlight
armature. so a limited view could become more comprehensive and yet there
could be instances of literacy in all these cases, though some observation
may be more knowledgeable or access more detail or contextual data or
understanding and more accurately model the situation in the totality of
the dimensions it exists, which could be a vast many, given what is being
observed. and it is that question of the potential observation, what is the
potential knowledge that could be yielded from a situation, as if via a
live archaeological dig (yet interdisciplinary, across all disciplines in
all their dimensions as a shared empirical framework)... such that a given
plot of space-time could be accounted for in its entirety, conceptualized
and empirically modeled... and what if such modeling could one day be
remotely accessed via tools, to allow extended literacy of the group into
individual situations, and what if technology helped this to occur versus
became a limit for any such interactions with nature and ourselves beyond a
warped configuration hell-bent on keeping this capacity away from humans
you would need to have a common model for observations that society would
be developed around, both in the way people think and consider ideas and
communicate and in how tools allow access to this knowledge, which then
becomes a basis for shared governance.
what is a critical difference between the most basic pattern recognition
(streetlamp = streetlamp) versus its N-dimensional consideration, is that
limits may exist that bound a given observation to particular views or a
particular interpretative framework, and thus the sliding scale of literacy
as it relates to people seeing what they are able to see based on what they
know and what they think about. thus an unthinking person may not see what
is directly in front of them because they are not aware or are 'elsewhere'
in their relation, whereas a person who observes what is in front of them
in terms of physical artifacts may not have words or language to describe
or define what they are seeing in the terms it exists, or it may be crude
by comparison to someone with expert or specialist knowledge who knows the
particular details a situation involves - thus the information of the
utility person and gardener and structural engineers and maintenance crew
and this could be an issue of parameters- what experience does a person
have who is observing, as to what can be accounted for in the observation
and thus, a person who knows chemistry or biology or particular ecosystems
or city history would have a further expanded understanding of the context
for what is observed in its given dimensions, as they may or may not apply
directly to the streetlamp, in situ, as it is evaluated in given terms.
literacy could be unbounded, or bounded and infinite, and could involve a
*potential* such that observations of an event could cross various limits
or categories of consideration, based upon the parameters of evaluation
accessible and used by the observer. relational navigation of structural
frameworks of the empirical model, as signs and systems interrelate and
interconnect across various dimensions, this the ecology of nested sets
dynamics, the interdisciplinary yet integrated empirical perspective.
now an individual may have a limit upon what can be observed and known in
their particular experience, yet questioning could exist beyond this limit
and thus face that threshold condition of 'not knowing' and yet not having
data to learn from either, perhaps comparable to a wall of illiteracy. and
this could be rather immediate for most everyone to some degree or other.
yet a transformed relation could exist, whether natural or augmented that
allows such data to be queried and thus each person could reference such a
shared empirical model and surpass these limits, answer and consider these
questions, and build up a higher resolution model and understanding that is
removed of errors or wrong assumptions, and thus operate in A=A fidelity,
evaluated in terms of an error-corrected contingent modeling of truth,
versus relying on a local particular view based in pseudotruth by default
what is more, someone could have access to omniscient technological tools
and yet have faulty modeling, ungrounded and skewed observations based on
wrong assumptions that rely upon limits and false frameworks, and thus
while they could access 'greater knowledge' they may be censoring or
editing out data and only seeing certain views yet also biased, warped,
distorted observations that are shared in this shared computational state;
and thus to some extent in their inaccurate observations (A=B), even while
having advanced technology, could be less literate than those without the
same tools, because their modeling is wrong and limited and bounded by a
certain ideological interpretation, thus preventing accurate observation to
some limit or degree or within certain dimensions; pattern matching could
for instance be crude in such an approach, yet not be accounted for in its
error-reliance nor in its deviation from lawful existence with others who
are in the same environment, yet may not be evaluated in these terms
thus, a class or group of people could have such technology akin to highly
advanced Google Glass that functions as technological eyeballs connected to
databases, and they could be surveilling others via this covert capacity,
yet the pattern-matching could itself be off, inaccurate, flawed, and thus
false positives could exist, or 'truth' that may be inside that viewpoint
may only be partial, yet believed absolute truth, for lack of any outside
accountability for the error-rate it involves. and that could then lead to
a false perspective for the surveillance cameras, who peer outward, in that
what they are seeing may not be 'reality itself' and instead could involve
and does involve warping, skew, and distortion by default of ideological
biasing and relativistic frameworks, in the context of absolute truth,
beyond that given boundary, to include all truth of the shared situation.
such a technological viewpoint could be self-sustaining, not requiring an
outside validation because it is 'above' or governing over the destruction
of civilization- yet its presumption of superiority and correctness, as
with assumptions that signs wrongly equal what they signify, could ignore
external truth and operate within that threshold and limit and parameters
that allow a onesided viewpoint to persist unchallenged and without regard
to truth beyond that contained and managed boundary. say, all truth that
exists that is not contained within the model, yet viewed subservient to
it, such as the cosmos itself in its entirety and all that it involves. and
thus to take a finite limited perspective and privilege it over all other
truth, by denying or ignoring or oppressing and silencing it, then can also
establish certain dynamics that are mediated in terms of relations, this is
to include those that are perceived 'lower' when they are in fact 'higher'
in the realm of knowledge and awareness and understanding of what is, yet
the power relations in a corrupted society may exploit this and allow the
partial view to manage and rule over the human viewpoint, instead, which
replaces truth with its substitute, aka the global false perspective.
in that corruption, technological tools for those in societal systems then
seem to encourage incapacity to change these parameters and limits, and
school systems actively censor and punish independent thought and ideas
that do not conform to the limits and enforced boundaries, and it is these
vary constraints that the machinery requires people to submit to in order
to function as it does today. else everyone is a potential wrench thrown
into the ideological works, and thus must be discarded as a threat to the
maintenance and smooth operation of the warped wheelwork, biased gearing. a
savagery and violence exists in the realm of stopping thought and ideas and
human actions via these same viewpoints, stopping communications and basic
relations, reference to the dimensions that exist via accurate modeling and
portrayals, instead this brings on punishment, retaliation, aggressions
those who defer to truth are connected with humans, yet though those who
require truth to defer to their private viewpoints are not the same, they
have given up something essential to get where they are, and they require
the limits to be what they are, in order to succeed in that given approach,
yet this is the same requirement of the broken tools and broken society,
that it remains broken and this be normalized, for some to succeed within
the system while all other humans fail and are subjugated by this agenda
the binary computer is the artifact that maps directly to this same flawed
modeling and the oppressive political ideology that rules over civilization
as a state of disease, focused upon death and money and SHIT, to be honest,
as its ethics and morality, as if fucking people over is a virtue somehow,
and then this encoded into peoples minds, relations, activities, and into
the code and software and hardware that subverts the tools and allows them
to be exploited, broken, and crippled if their use is beyond the boundary
or jeopardizes the feelings of the ideologues who just want to feel safe,
and so activities and thoughts that they are threatened by become limits,
as it does not serve their governing agenda, and so on, as this involves
what is not accounted for in the given calculations in surveillance society
the thing is, you could have the most advanced technology in the world, say
a distributed network of quantum supercomputers -- yet if the modeling and
viewpoint and interpretation inside the device is flawed and biased, in can
instead serve tyranny and become the foundation for lawless oppression over
a captive population. the way people think, their psychology and the limits
and frameworks they rely upon matter, it influences and effects how the
tools develop and who they serve -- some private subset or the human public
and thus the minds that are managing the technological works cannot by
default be assumed to have access to unfettered truth, nor should they be
allowed to operate under the assumption of infallible decision-making that
is reliant on binary views, a too simple simplicity for issues at stake,
and instead accountability _must occur at this interior level in terms of
A=A accuracy in a model of empirical truth, and not A=B or B=B inaccuracy
that is normalized via biased relativism of a privatized hidden mindset
that is assumed 'true' by default of being able to communicate via signs as
if the signage itself is self-validating. that is madness, diagnostically.
there is no reason to believe the interior perspective is actually either
grounded or sane, given the standardization of mediocrity. it is far more
likely it is corrupted like every other institutional system and operates
in parameters that are inaccurately mapped to reality and decision-making
occurs within those warped and skewed frameworks by default. it is highly
probable and extremely unlikely spontaneous empirical truth is generated
within existing binary, relativistic contexts, now matter how subtle.
in this way, the same flaws inherent in the desktop and networked computer
systems of today, yet at the core of the state, and likewise equally able
to be fully exploited for a private onesided agenda unless brought under
control and audited and answerable to the human public it supposedly serves
in its mission. that is a notion that cannot be based on hidden trust and
requires accountability and oversight and understanding of the processes
and models by which these perspective-machines are tabulating citizens into
state modeling and how private corporations are likewise exploiting these
dynamics for profit, both political and monetary.
the tools are inherently flawed unless removed of error. they do not start
clean, especially if protected in their error-reliant processing. they must
be held to a higher standard than personal evaluation and 'true belief'.
such religious faith in technocracy has no place as a ruling ideology
because its values - the parameters of its perspective - are machine-based
and thus it is trivial to edit out human details and awareness and provide
a false viewpoint by which to observe, peer into peoples lives and oppress
them via this same infrastructure. the core problem is thinking, belief
that is detached from its accountability to and service to greater truth. a
subverted state that is attacking its own citizens via cyberwarfare is a
state that is attacking itself, except the equation can be flipped...
private.state > public.state
private.state < public.state
accountability can occur in reverse, the panoptic lens can force review of
situations beyond account due to limits used to hide political agendas. the
evidence of an offensive against citizens indicates corruption at the core
and that these same tools are being exploited for private political gain
and should not be allowed to continue under the existing management, as the
continued operation of the surveillance infrastructure under the existing
terms is a threat to citizen and the larger society for lack of accounting
for a larger truth than what exists on the inside within a finite worldview
the only basis for accountability will be empirical truth removed of lies
and falsehoods and too highly constricted limits to what can be discussed
about what the issue are and how they are modeled via code, programming,
software and hardware tools. people have a right to know how they are being
modeled and if these models are accurate. it is certain they are skewed and
biased, given institutional and societal adherence to binary ideology, the
lingua franca of today. something vital has been lost and needs to be
recovered. truth needs to be secured, in peoples minds and within the core
of the calculations in technological society. anything less is tyranny, and
the basis for its legitimation, sustenance, and further antihuman extension
(if the state is operating within a false perspective it is a threat to
everybody and must be corrected. there is every indication this is the
situation. if this false perspective is used to interpret surveillance,
then the models themselves must be reviewed for their accuracy, it cannot
be assumed as a preexisting condition simply due to sign-based beliefs.)
icepick, sawmill, electric winch
☎ <---> ☎
