- cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

Craig Wright vs Cypherpunk Philosophy
by grarpamp 15 Apr '19

15 Apr '19

https://medium.com/@craig_10243/satoshi-nakamoto-a7c4cf21253e " Satoshi Nakamoto Craig Wright (Bitcoin SV is Bitcoin.) Apr 5 2019 Satoshi Nakamoto is an amalgamation of 富永仲基 (Tominaga Nakamoto) and Ash Ketchum (サトシ; Satoshi). The name wasn’t something that I spent months and months on deciding, and it doesn’t mean anything related to what you see on the wikis. Rather, it was an attempt at privacy. I’d met Tim May back in the 80s when I was involved with DECUS under a number of SunOS groups. There were of course the black sheep groups such as the cypherpunks. For a start, I understand that anarchy is a utopian pipe-dream. Unfortunately, when you get groups of people who have little interaction with the real world, they are starting to believe stories and myths of a society that can exist without order. Worse, they start to believe in computerised order, the singularity, and that code is law. A few of us got on, but for the most part I was ridiculed by people who refused to understand that risk is a probabilistic ideal and can never be perfected and removed. More importantly, I was ridiculed by people with no idea of people or society. There is a lot to be said for a classical Western education. The moniker, Satoshi Nakamoto, was simply a way of being able to work and have some privacy in my life. It was both a homage to Tominaga Nakamoto and a play on the second. The Economist had an article in 1988, and it featured the phoenix of rising money; in order to make some fun out of it, I used Ash (aka Satoshi) from the Pokemon fame. Funny enough, most of the lawyers I speak to get it. When you actually explain the technology behind Bitcoin, those who have a grounding in law and economics start to see the system. Privacy and anonymity are polar opposites. I am Wesleyan. If you understand that, you’ll start to understand my philosophy on wealth. If you read Andrew Carnegie’s The Gospel of Wealth, and not just the title without moving forward, you may start to understand my long-term plans. Unlike Andrew Carnegie, I don’t plan to retire in my 50s, nor in my 60s, nor in my 70s, nor even in my 80s. There is a lot of work remaining to get Bitcoin to where I want it to be. I expect at least 30 years of work to do so. At that point, I am hoping it will be sufficiently advanced so that others can carry it forward. Having said so, within the year it will be locked with the protocol fixed and the asinine changes removed. >From here, once it is set in stone, it will remain set in stone. Code is not law. Those lazy of thought and mind enough to believe that they can abrogate the responsibility that they have to the society they live in deserve all they get. In a democracy, you have the right to seek change. It does not mean people will agree with you. If you don’t like the law, work to change it. The great men of history are not great because they sought to throw away the law, they are great as they sought to align it to freedom. It is simple to say that things should be different. It is difficult to stand up and take the brunt of the attacks that come to one who stands against the status quo. It is simple to say things should be different, but it is incredibly hard to have the courage to stand up and fight for change. There are many ways to seek change in our society. Anarchy is not one of them and never can be. It is simply the path to destruction. It is the path to totalitarian control, a path that those who promote it seek. They do so as wolves leading lambs. I knew that eventually I would no longer be able to be secret. I knew that my past and my involvement would start to come out, but I had hoped for a longer period of time. The irony that few saw is concealed in the name. Tominaga was a merchant and philosopher. He wrote during the Tokugawa period of Japan. The time for remaining in the shadows has passed. Tominaga taught us that “concealment is the beginning of the habit of lying and stealing.” He was an anti-traditionalist, a logician, and an early capitalist in the days of mercantilism. He once said, “our age today is one of corruption by liars and robbers.” We remain in such an age. Money has been corrupted. We create synthetic systems of synthetic systems designed with nothing more than a goal to move numbers between systems. Money from Main Street to Wall Street and away from where it’s needed. We see the same again in what we call crypto. The frauds and the charlatans seek to pump false gains, and they say that what they do is about democratising freedom, and in fact they seek to remove the controls that protect the average person so that they can better engage in their Ponzi schemes and scams. Nobody wins by having ICOs. They are no different to the dematerialised penny shares that floated around the Internet in the 90s as web IPOs. Unfortunately, all too many of us are too young to remember or were not exposed enough to the Internet at the time. People know very little about my life. My belief system aligns well with Nakamoto Tominaga’s. He promoted the doctrine of simplicity and honesty. It is not, as some such as Gandhi have promoted, the abandonment of technology but rather the use of technology as capital. Rather than seeking simply to escape from work, we find ways to improve what we are doing and extend it, to create more, to build, and to evolve. The irony of those attacking and calling what I’m doing a lie is that they do not even seem to understand the value of truth. I always liked the Japanese way of thinking, the only philosophical theories of the Indian and Chinese Buddhists too profound and abstract to infiltrate into the minds and thoughts of the common people within early Japan. It led to a simplification but also, for quite some time, a difference in how intellectuals were perceived. As with the Roman Republic, the people at the time were not anti-intellectual but rather avoided the trap of intellectual society as they created based on logic and simple truths. Tominaga was the Eastern Voltaire. Nakamoto always said, “concealment is the start of lying and stealing.” I will say, anonymity in its truest form is the heart of crime and deception. Those seeking to tell you that anonymity is in any way like privacy are seeking to draw you into the shadows. They are the wolves who seek your fleece. To create Bitcoin, I used the very system of thought it is designed to collapse. Those with socialist tendencies, and yes, anarchy is in all forms aligned to socialism, tend to think in terms of religious mysticism. If you have read Nakamoto Tominaga’s surviving works, you may come to understand the same. All of what I have said and done is hidden in plain sight. Such was the nature of my company, Panoopticrypt. It means, all that is hidden. When you understand the difference between privacy and anonymity and how the latter destroys the former, you start to understand the deceptive call that the mystic makes on society in the pervasive and insidious call to a utopia. Although I liked Tim, I knew in the 90s that I needed to find something else. I knew it would be my life goal, after reading Wei Dai’s juvenile and ill-conceived call for b-money: ' I am fascinated by Tim May’s crypto-anarchy. Unlike the communities traditionally associated with the word “anarchy”, in a crypto-anarchy the government is not temporarily destroyed but permanently forbidden and permanently unnecessary. It’s a community where the threat of violence is impotent because violence is impossible, and violence is impossible because its participants cannot be linked to their true names or physical locations.' Bitcoin was designed to scale to create something more than the casino that is finance. It is not the exchange that people called the market that allows growth in the creation of capital but rather the exchange of goods between individuals for consumption. A market is not the casino we call the exchange. Such lies need to end. My revolution is not cypherpunk. I took all they had, and I created something more. Bitcoin destroys anonymity in all its forms. It allows privacy, takes all that such people sought to do, their foolhardy desire to create a utopia, and changes it allowing Main Street, those that seek to work and create. The proletariat. The middle class. The average person seeking to create a life. It builds a society for them. It is nobler to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune but as you take arms and oppose them. Not to die or to sleep, not to end. To see not calamity and long life, the whips and scorns of time are hard and challenge the patient merit as the unworthy take acts of pale thought against us. The bare bodkin is insufficient to pierce the armour of the man with a passion to change the system corrupting us. Social media need no longer make conscious cowards of the soul, for when we go forward we will know that those who seek to attack us must face reality and cannot hide in the shadows of the great pith and little movement. In the present world of finance, what Tominaga would have called a world of decadence, a place where many people are cheating and stealing and creating ICOs, it is intolerable that in allowing those who teach the lies, the utopian view that code is law and that a world can exist without order, we should let it occur and not stand to oppose it. Those people who say that they are bringing freedom as they seek what they call a democratisation of finance protect the corruption that seeps through it rather than oppose vices. They all imitate a habit of secrecy. They create rules and hierarchies. They enact systems that are deplorable but operate through secret instructions and techno-mystical religious dogma designed not to create, not to build capital but to enable the transmission of secrecy. They tell you they seek truth, yet in reality they obscure and they cheat. Bitcoin ends all of it. Not in minutes, not in days, and not quickly. None of it occurs in “Internet time.” The path forward is already set in stone. And right now, I don’t care whether you believe me. I have my own way of doing things, and most importantly, the first part is to understand that code is not law. In the period coming up in the growth and development of what I’m creating, you come to understand who I am and what I have created and why. In time, there won’t even be any doubt, but it is my time and my way to choose. Most importantly, I’m not going to do anything in any way that aligns with the lies that are taught by the crypto community. I am going to teach you how flawed, how insidious, and how evil the heart of code as law really is. I’m going to teach you about the frauds that they propagate, the lies that they use, and the totalitarian ends that they seek to bring as they try to enslave you. The end of the long road that one steps on in seeking a world where code acts as law is one without humanity. Code is inflexible, there is no heart or soul in code. The strength of the law is that it can be flexible. It is not fixed and unalterable, and can bend. I was a part of the movement that was the cypherpunks. Not because I agreed but because it needed to be stopped. When you understand Bitcoin, when you understand a sound system of money that acts to allow exchange privately but with an immutable evidence trail, you will start to understand why I created Bitcoin. I created Bitcoin to ensure that the world the ignorant seek to create, the totalitarian utopia by those seeking a world based on an inflexible code-is-law algorithmic system, never evolves. I spent 20 years designing Bitcoin. I started in 1998, and went through more iterations than I can ever hope to imagine and remember before finally coming up with something that worked. Welcome to freedom; it comes through a system that consumes utopians and spits them out. The system within Bitcoin is stronger than you believe, and it was designed to not work in many other ways. It takes naïve idealism, and crushes it if it does not evolve into something of considered thought. It no longer matters whether you like it; Bitcoin was carefully considered, and no blockchain-based system ever allows you to create the totalitarian utopia that is the ultimate dystopia of a world where code is law and order is crushed in anarchy. "

2 3

Re: WikiLeaks Publishes Its List of Files for Download
by John Young 14 Apr '19

14 Apr '19

WikiLeaks Donors 2009, pre-Collateral Murder/Manning windfall. https://file.wikileaks.org/file/wikileaks-leaks-donors.txt

1 0

No civil rights in NatSec domain
by coderman 13 Apr '19

13 Apr '19

during the case with Roark, the government also surveilled communications and interfered with legal proceedings. NatSec cases give no regard to civil rights in legal process. constitutionality is a myth, no longer given fig leaf treatment. --- https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/04/11/cia_vault_7/ Client-attorney privilege? Not when you're accused of leaking Vault 7 CIA code Lawyer for Joshua Schulte unhappy about agency review By [Kieren McCarthy in San Francisco](https://www.theregister.co.uk/Author/Kieren-McCarthy) 11 Apr 2019 at 22:05 The lawyer for former CIA employee Joshua Schulte is unhappy the spy agency is allowed to review communications with her client before she receives it and has accused the agency of trying to intimidate her. Schulte's lawyer, Sabrina Shroff, appeared in a New York court on Wednesday and argued that the CIA was abusing client-attorney privilege as well as threatening her with future legal repercussions for receiving confidential material. "The CIA essentially has threatened us,” Shroff told the judge. Asked whether the spy agency was also listening in on her confidential conversations with her client, she responded: "We don't know." The CIA [believes](https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/05/15/vault_7_leak/) that Schulte was behind a [massive leak](https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/03/23/wikileaks_cia_darkmatter_vault_7/) of material from the spy agency that outlined how it is able to install spy software on laptops and phones. But it has been unable to prove the assertion. Schulte is currently in jail on unrelated charges of possession and distribution of child abuse images but the CIA has made it plain he is the prime suspect in the information leak. Schulte was in charge of a server that contained 54GB of illegal content but has pled not guilty, arguing that he was running a public server and had no idea about the images. Thanks to his work for the CIA's engineering development group and the spy agency's suspicions that he was behind the leak, he and his lawyer have been put under extreme restrictions. Schulte's lawyer has to make a request to meet with him one week prior to any meeting. He is then transferred to a special secure area that is monitored by CCTV before being strip-searched and chained to the floor. His lawyer is not allowed to take in any equipment and must use a government-supplied computer to review any material – conditions [imposed](https://regmedia.co.uk/2019/04/11/schulte-conditions.pdf) [PDF] by the judge. But despite specific provisions that prevent jail staff from recording any audio or sharing any information with the prosecution, Shroff suspects the CIA is monitoring her meetings regardless. Delay tactics She is also frustrated that the court ordered that any material produced by Schulte is first reviewed by the CIA before it is supplied to her, and that the agency seems to be going out of its way to delay access, as well as frustrate her efforts to provide him with a defense. "We are experiencing significant delay in the CIA's process of classifying our client’s work product," she [wrote](https://regmedia.co.uk/2019/04/11/schulte-delay.pdf) [PDF] to the judge in March, giving the example of one document that had taken more than two weeks to be cleared. "We ask that the Court impose reasonable deadlines by which time the CIA walled individual must respond to documents given to him for classification review." She argued for a 10-day maximum. The government [responded](https://regmedia.co.uk/2019/04/11/cia-schulte-no-control.pdf) [PDF] saying that it had no way to speed up the process because the CIA officer in charge of reviewing the material is independent from its prosecutorial team. In court on Wednesday, the government even argued that the CIA was a "victim" in the whole process, facing criticism for doing its job of protecting national security secrets. Shroff made her disagreement known. Prior to the court hearing, Shroff repeatedly informed the judge that the CIA was hindering her work "because the CIA insists that all of his written communications with counsel - down to each comment or proposed edit to any work product - must be reviewed and cleared in advance by the 'walled' CIA employee." The walled employee has also failed to sign a Memorandum of Understanding, she [complained](https://regmedia.co.uk/2019/04/11/schulte-mou-delay.pdf) [PDF], by "insisting on continued edits to standard language." Schoff argued for restrictions surrounding the search warrants lodged against her client two years earlier be lifted because they have contained no confidential information. In reply, the government [argued](https://regmedia.co.uk/2019/04/11/schulte-cia-search-warrants.pdf) [PDF] that Schulte and his lawyer had broken an earlier agreement not to share any information in the case, accusing them of providing information to the press. Thanks to the CIA-imposed delays, the judge delayed the start date of the trial – which was due to begin on April 8 – and instead ordered a joint conference yesterday, April 10. Here's a solution After Schoff outlined her frustrations at that hearing, the New York attorney prosecuting Schulte for the child abuse images charge suggested that one of his lawyers be used to review communications instead of the CIA employee, in order to speed things up. Schoff argued that that process would make it even easier for the CIA to break client-attorney privilege. "I want to have an open attorney-client relationship with Mr Schulte just like I do with everyone else," she pleaded with the judge. "We don't want to have Mr Schulte's documents read by the CIA at all," she told the hearing according to a [report](https://www.law360.com/cybersecurity-privacy/articles/1148778/cia-r… from Law360. It's unclear how the judge will ultimately decide – or whether that decision will even be made public since the entire case is under a special protective order. The judge could simply order that the two cases – the child abuse images case and the CIA leak case – be separated. But then, of course, that would limit the CIA's ability to make Schulte's life a misery.

1 0

Hackers publish information on thousands of US police officers and federal agents
by jim bell 13 Apr '19

13 Apr '19

https://techcrunch.com/2019/04/12/police-data-hack/ [partial quote follows.] "A hacker group has breached several FBI-affiliated websites and uploaded their contents to the web, including dozens of files containing the personal information of thousands of federal agents and law enforcement officers, TechCrunch has learned. "The hackers breached three sites associated with the FBI National Academy Association, a coalition of different chapters across the U.S. promoting federal and law enforcement leadership and training located at the FBI training academy in Quantico, VA. The hackers exploited flaws on at least three of the organization’s chapter websites — which we’re not naming — and downloaded the contents of each web server. "The hackers then put the data up for download on their own website, which we’re also not naming nor linking to given the sensitivity of the data. "The spreadsheets contained about 4,000 unique records after duplicates were removed, including member names, a mix of personal and government email addresses, job titles, phone numbers and their postal addresses. The FBINAA could not be reached for comment outside of business hours. If we hear back, we’ll update. "TechCrunch spoke to one of the hackers, who didn’t identify his or her name, through an encrypted chat late Friday. “We hacked more than 1,000 sites,” said the hacker. “Now we are structuring all the data, and soon they will be sold. I think something else will publish from the list of hacked government sites.” We asked if the hacker was worried that the files they put up for download would put federal agents and law enforcement at risk. “Probably, yes,” the hacker said. "The hacker claimed to have “over a million data” [sic] on employees across several U.S. federal agencies and public service organizations. [end partial quote]

1 0

Zero Knowledge Podcast
by grarpamp 13 Apr '19

13 Apr '19

https://www.zeroknowledge.fm/ Episode 72: zkSNARKs for Scale with Matter Labs Episode 71: Getting Radicle with Julian Arni Episode 70: Digging into DAI with Rune Christensen from Maker Episode 69: Decentralised Storage with Arweave Episode 68: Conversations at EthCC Episode 67: Formal Verification with Martin Lundfall Episode 66: ETH2.0 Update With Danny Ryan Episode 65: Bridges, xDai and Burner Wallets with Igor & Austin Episode 64: Unleashing Melon into the wild with Jenna Zenk Episode 63: Proxy re-encryption and FHE with NuCypher Episode 62: The path to an ERC standard Episode 61: Statistical modeling of PoS systems with Tarun Chitra Episode 60: Cryptography 101: Multi-Party Computations Episode 59: STARKs & StarkWare with Eli and Alessandro Episode 58: Kicking off 2019 with Jutta Steiner Episode 57: Merklize this! Merkle Trees & Patricia Tries Episode 56: Get to know a Core Dev: Martin Holst Swende Episode 55: ETHSingapore in review Episode 54: Digging into recursive zkSNARKs with Coda Episode 53: Get to know a Core Dev: Péter Szilágyi Episode 52: Vlad and Gav go head-to-head on blockchain governance Episode 51: Exploring Spacemesh with Julian Loss Episode 50: Zooko talks Zcash on our 50th episode Episode 49: Blockchain 101: Cryptoeconomic Primitives and Staking Episode 48: Talking UX with Taylor Monahan of MyCrypto Episode 47: Chat with Richard Craib from Numerai Episode 46: Gavin Wood on Polkadot, Sharding and Substrate Episode 45: P2P messaging with Henri from Streamr Episode 44: Blockchain 101: Transaction lifecycle & the mempool Episode 43: Hudson Jameson talks EIPs and Ethereum core decision-making Episode 42: ETHPrize & Open Source Block Explorers Episode 41: Zokrates with Jacob Eberhardt Episode 40: Benedikt Bünz on Bulletproofs and Verifiable Delay Functions Episode 39: Matthew Di Ferrante on the security of blockchain clients Episode 38: Intro to zkSNARKs with Howard Wu Episode 37: Sharding Update With Prysmatic Labs Episode 36: Eric Tang of Livepeer talks off-chain computation Episode 35: Testnets with Ethan from Tendermint Episode 34: Blockchain 101: What are smart contracts? Episode 33: Open Source Incentivization and Sustainability with OSCoin Episode 32: Zero Knowledge at Zcon0! Episode 31: Blockchain 101: Blocks & Block Headers Episode 30: Open Organizations & Governance with Colony Episode 29: The DAO, the white hat hacker group & Giveth with Griff Episode 28: ETHBuenosAires in review Episode 27: Zeppelin and a chat about upgradability Episode 26: What and why of eWasm with Lane and Alex Episode 25: Storage rent with Phil Daian Episode 24: Blockchain UX and the UXUnConf Episode 23: Blockchain 101: get your full node running! Episode 22: Developer Education in Blockchain Episode 21: Introduction to Zero Knowledge Proofs Episode 20: Ecosystem development with Jon Choi of Ethereum Foundation Episode 19: ZK Summit, sharding, testnets and ASIC resistance Episode 17: Discussing Plasma and Storage Rent with Karl Floersch and Phil Daian Episode 16: Talking security with JP Smith from Trail of Bits Episode 15: Chatting about consensus algorithms with Robert Habermeier Episode 14: Diving deep into DFINITY Episode 13: Bloom filters, PoA and what's up with ERP? Episode 12: How to become a blockchain developer? We ask Gavin Wood Episode 11: Pragma's new tools and staying agile in blockchain Episode 10: Blockchain, Open-Source & Security Episode 9: Bootnodes, Databases and News Episode 8: Decentralized Storage Part 2: Solutions Episode 7: Decentralized Storage Part 1: Looking back Episode 6: s/2017/2018: our New Year's Podcast Episode 5: A fireside chat with a couple Parity peeps Episode 4: Dapps and Kitties Episode 3: Hard Forks Episode 2: PoW, what is it and why do we want PoS Episode 1: RustFest 2017 in Review

1 0

** Last day for submission ** 14+ SIs ** CFP SpaCCS 2019: The 12th International Conference on Security, Privacy and Anonymity in Computation, Communication and Storage
by Jun Feng 13 Apr '19

13 Apr '19

[Apologies if you receive multiple copies of this message] Call For Papers ============================================================================= The 12th International Conference on Security, Privacy and Anonymity in Computation, Communication and Storage (SpaCCS 2019) July 14-July 17, 2019, Atlanta, USA http://cse.stfx.ca/~cybermatics/2019/spaccs/ The 2019 International Conference on Security, Privacy and Anonymity in Computation, Communication and Storage (SpaCCS 2019) is the 12th event in the series of conferences which are devoted to security, privacy and anonymity in computation, communication and storage. SpaCCS is now recognized as the main regular event of the world that is covering many dimensions including security algorithms and architectures, privacy-aware policies, regulations and techniques, anonymous computation and communication, encompassing fundamental theoretical approaches, practical experimental projects, and commercial application systems for computation, communication and storage. As applications of computer systems and networks have permeated in every aspect of our daily life, the issues of security, privacy, and anonymity have become increasingly critical. The conference will provide a forum for the world-class researchers to gather and share their research achievements, emerging ideas and trends in the highly challenging research fields. ============================================================================= All accepted papers will be published by Springer LNCS (EI Indexed). Best Paper Awards will be presented to high quality papers. Distinguished papers, after further revisions, will be be published in 14+ SCI & EI indexed prestigious journals (confirmed). 1. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology Special Issue on Decentralized Blockchain Applications and Infrastructures for Next Generation Cyber-Physical Systems https://toit.acm.org/pdf/ACM-ToIT-CfP-Decentralized_Blockchain_Applications… Publisher: ACM, IF = 1.727 2. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering Special Issue: Blockchain in Future Networks and Vertical Industries Publisher: IEEE 3. IET Cyber-Physical Systems: Theory & Applications Special Issue: Advanced Technologies for Cyber Physical Systems Publisher: IET 4. IEEE Access Special Section on Deep Learning: Security and Forensics Research Advances and Challenges https://ieeeaccess.ieee.org/special-sections/deep-learning-security-and-for… Publisher: IEEE, IF = 3.557 5. Transactions on Blockchain Technology and Applications http://vdlt.io/tIndex.html Special Issue: Advances in Blockchain and Internet-of-Things 6. Digital Communications and Networks Special Issue: TBD Publisher: Elsevier, SCI indexed in 2019 7. Sensors Special Issue: IoT-Enabled Sensor Networks: Vision and Challenges https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sensors/special_issues/IoT_SensorNet Publisher: MDPI, IF = 2.475 8. Remote Sensing Special Issue: Intelligence Computing Paradigms with Remote Sensing Networks in Water Hydrology https://www.mdpi.com/journal/remotesensing/special_issues/water_Computation… Publisher: MDPI, IF = 3.406 9. Journal of Systems Architecture Special Issue: Dependable Cyber Physical Systems (SI: DCPS19) https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-systems-architecture/call-for-… Publisher: Elsevier, IF = 0.913 10. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking Special Issue: Human-centered Computing in Cloud / Edge / Fog https://jwcn-eurasipjournals.springeropen.com/human-centered-computing Publisher: Springer, IF = 2.407 11. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking Special Issue: Multi-modal Sensor Data Fusion in Internet of Things https://jwcn-eurasipjournals.springeropen.com/multi-modal-sensor Publisher: Springer, IF = 2.407 12. CCF Transactions on Pervasive Computing and Interaction Special Issue: Pervasive Intelligence: State-of-the- Art, Challenges and Perspectives 13. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics Special Issue: Blockchain and Healthcare Computing Publisher: IEEE, IF= 3.850 14. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics Special Issue: Blockchain in Industrial IoT Applications Security and Privacy Advances, Challenges and Opportunities Publisher: IEEE, IF= 5.43 * More special issues will be added later. ================== Important Dates ================== Submission Deadline (Extended): April 14, 2019 Authors Notification Date: May 12, 2019 Final Manuscript Due: June 02, 2019 Conference Date: July 14 - July 17, 2019 ================== Topics of interest include, but are not limited to ================== Track 1: Security 1.1 Computation - Secure computation - Artificial Intelligence Security - CPS Security - Internet-of-Things Security - CPSS Security - Blockchain Security - Secure Sustainable Computing - Homomorphic Encryption - Big Data Security - Cloud Computing Security - Fog Computing Security - Edge Computing Security - Secure Network Computing - Risk Analysis and Management - Software and System Security 1.2 Communication - Network Security - Malware and Botnets - Intrusion Detection - Security in Software-Defined Networking - Security in Web Services - Security in Mobile Social Networks - Security in Mobile and Wireless Communications - Fraud and Cyber-Crime 1.3 Storage - Access Control - Accounting and Audit - Applied Cryptography - Database Security - Authentication - Computer forensics - Data Protection and Data Integrity - Digital Content Protection and Digital Forensics - Information Hiding - Security in Big Data and its Applications Track 2: Privacy 2.1 Computation - Measuring and Quantifying Privacy - Privacy Modelling and Analysis - Software and System Privacy - Privacy-preserving Computing - Differential Privacy - Blockchain-based Computation - Privacy-enhanced Network Computing - Obfuscation-based Privacy - Cryptographic Tools - Building and Deploying Privacy-enhancing Systems - Reliability, Robustness, and Abuse Prevention in Privacy Systems 2.2 Communication - Privacy in Web Services - Privacy Metrics and Policies - Crowdsourcing for Privacy - Location and Mobility Privacy - Privacy in Cloud and Big Data Applications - Blockchain-based Communication - Quantum Communications - Privacy in Ubiquitous Computing and Mobile Devices - Privacy in Social Networks and Microblogging Systems - Privacy-enhanced Access Control, Authentication, and Identity Management 2.3 Storage - Data Protection Technologies - Privacy in Big Data and its Applications - Policy Languages and Tools for Privacy - Privacy and Human Rights - Blockchain-based Storage - Interdisciplinary Research Connecting Privacy to Other Fields - Privacy in Cloud Computing and Pervasive/Ubiquitous Computing - Information Leakage, Data Correlation and Generic Attacks to Privacy - Privacy-Preserving Data Mining, Data Release and Publishing Track 3: Anonymity 3.1 Computation - Anonymous Data Mining and Data Sharing - Parallelism Exploitation Techniques for Anonymity - Anonymity in Big Data Analytics - Anonymous Management in Trust Relationships - Anonymous Video Analytics Technology - Anonymity Metrics, Measures and Evaluations - Anonymity Models, Hardware/Device of Anonymity 3.2 Communication - Anonymity in Wireless Communication Systems - Anonymous Communication Protocols - Anonymity in Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Sensor Networks - Anonymous Proxy Software - Anonymous Communication and Internet - Anonymous Social Networks, Structural k-Anonymity in Social Networks - Authentication Protocol Providing User Anonymity 3.3 Storage - Anonymous Information Storage and Management - Private and Anonymous Data Storage - Forensics - Anonymity-Preserving Data Collection and Database - Anonymity, Pseudonymity & Identity Management - Anonymity in Big Data and Cloud Scenarios - Anonymity in Health and Medical Databases ================== Paper Submission ================== All papers need to be submitted electronically through the conference website (https://edas.info/N25666) with PDF format. Submitted papers must not substantially overlap with papers that have been published or that are simultaneously submitted to a journal or a conference with proceedings. Papers must be clearly presented in English, must not exceed 14 pages (or up to 20 pages with the pages over length charge) in Springer LNCS format ( https://www.springer.com/gp/computer-science/lncs/conference-proceedings-gu…) including tables, figures, references and appendices. Papers will be selected based on their originality, significance, relevance, and clarity of presentation assessed by at least three reviewers. Submission of a paper should be regarded as a commitment that, should the paper be accepted, at least one of the authors will register and attend the conference to present the work. ================== Organizing Committee ================== General Chairs - Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo, University of Texas at San Antonio, USA - Mark Last, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel - Yanqing Zhang, Georgia State University, USA Program Chairs - Md Zakirul Alam Bhuiyan, Fordham University, USA - Jun Feng, St Francis Xavier University, Canada - Rongxing Lu, University of New Brunswick, Canada Workshop Chair - Wm. Bradley Glisson, Sam Houston State University, USA Publicity Chairs - Peter Mueller, IBM Zurich Research Laboratory, Switzerland - Reza M. Parizi, Kennesaw State University, USA - Yogachandran Rahulamathavan, Loughborough University London, UK Local Chair - Yubao Wu, Georgia State University, USA Web Chairs - Zihao Jiang, St. Francis Xavier University, Canada - Xin Nie, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China Steering Committee - Guojun Wang, Guangzhou University, China (Chair) - Gregorio Martinez, University of Murcia, Spain (Chair) - Jemal H. Abawajy, Deakin University, Australia - Jose M. Alcaraz Calero, University of the West of Scotland, UK - Jiannong Cao, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong - Hsiao-Hwa Chen, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan - Jinjun Chen, University of Technology Sydney, Australia - Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo, University of Texas at San Antonio, USA - Robert Deng, Singapore Management University, Singapore - Mario Freire, The University of Beira Interior, Portuga - Minyi Guo, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China - Weijia Jia, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China - Wei Jie, University of West London, UK - Georgios Kambourakis, University of the Aegean, Greece - Ryan Ko, University of Waikato, New Zealand - Constantinos Kolias, George Mason University, USA - Jianbin Li, Central South University, China - Jie Li, University of Tsukuba, Japan - Jianhua Ma, Hosei University, Japan - Felix Gomez Marmol, University of Murcia, Spain - Geyong Min, University of Exeter, UK - Peter Mueller, IBM Zurich Research Laboratory, Switzerland - Indrakshi Ray, Colorado State University, USA - Kouichi Sakurai, Kyushu University, Japan - Juan E. Tapiador, The University Carlos III of Madrid, Spain - Sabu M. Thampi, Indian Institute of Information Technology and Management, India - Jie Wu, Temple University, USA - Yang Xiao, The University of Alabama, USA - Yang Xiang, Swinburne University of Technology, Australia - Zheng Yan, Aalto University, Finland - Laurence T. Yang, St. Francis Xavier University, Canada - Wanlei Zhou, University of Technology Sydney, Australia -- Dr. Jun Feng St. Francis Xavier University Huazhong University of Science and Technology Mobile: +86-18827365073 E-Mails: junfeng989(a)gmail.com, 512675288(a)qq.com WeChat: junfeng10001000

1 0

At Least 17 Assange EDVA Court Filings Unreleased Plus a Sealed Associated Case
by John Young 13 Apr '19

13 Apr '19

http://cryptome.org/2019/04/assange-cases.jpg

4 4

/r/Piracy Takes a DMCA Scrubbing Under Duress, Censorship, Other Diversions
by grarpamp 13 Apr '19

13 Apr '19

https://www.reddit.com/r/Piracy/comments/b4pkwp/scrubbin_the_deck/ https://www.reddit.com/r/Piracy/comments/bcbzka/scrubbin_is_complete/ https://raddle.me/f/Piracy https://www.reddit.com/r/Piracy/comments/b2fte3/the_fallback/ https://www.reddit.com/r/Piracy/wiki/index /r/seedboxes /r/torrents /r/trackers /r/usenet /r/vpn /r/DHExchange /r/opendirectories /r/dataisbeautiful /r/archiveteam /r/MusicHoarder /r/datasets https://getaether.net/ aether://board/86caeb740eaa2c3baa345f920fa6d342c13814889666286ec51fbc6a4849d22b https://www.scuttlebutt.nz/ https://www.zie.one/en/ssb/ http://ssb.yomills.com/ #Piracy

1 0

IPFS Roadmap, Matrix.org Hacked, Lossless Media Datahoard, WL, Ceph, GUN
by grarpamp 13 Apr '19

13 Apr '19

https://github.com/ipfs/roadmap https://matrix.org/ A new basis for open, interoperable, decentralised real-time communication https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix.org/issues/371 https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2019/04/dvd-and-blu-ray-sales-nearly-halved… https://www.reddit.com/r/DataHoarder/ https://file.wikileaks.org/ https://github.com/amark/gun https://notabug.io/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceph_(software)

1 0

Re: [tor-talk] tor project website change
by grarpamp 13 Apr '19

13 Apr '19

> global adversaries > "they don't likely exist, or if they do, they're our friends" Highly capable Global Adversaries are well known to exist. TOP SECRET friends may perhaps be the friends of few, often end up generally corruptive, less than stellar, an uncertainty, etc... thus really shouldn't be kept or created. Seek out better ways. > implementing one of the newer designs seems unlikely. > Given that potential volunteers are working on Tor. That's another problem with large projects, like corporate and government monopolies, they can suck up all the air in the room... needed and valuable diversity, competition, and evolution gets starved out, groupthink herd monoculture etc sets in generations. In the space of critical use case anonymity, privacy, messaging tools, crypto utility application overlay networks, cryptocurrency, etc... a space too new to have enough breadth and depth of research paths dreamed up and exhausted so as to begin to see what works, to advise with confidence, or not... that would not be good at all. Tor... circuit based encrypted onion routing tcp with quasi decentral human roots of authority... is a done architecture model since 20 years, its wholesale novel development research covered in its early whitepapers. Researchers hoping for big architecture breakthroughs against adversaries, should probably investigate other potential and new solutions elsewhere. Even if only filling in currently uncovered use cases, on up to addressing current and expected evolution in adversaries, there is a lot of fun work to do out there beyond Tor. As for Tor, there is much left... tickets, UI, Web, Phone, optimization, obfuscation, their own "community", waging part in the overall pro privacy freedom speech crypto war, all sorts of research, improvements, and publication on how its network architecture is doing in vivo, where it's useful and not, ongoing operations... the long tail of Tor, same as any project. Tor gets so much money some said Tor could throw a bunch of it into an independant overlay competition fund. But since such parent child separation is not achievable, it is the donors who would need to start that up on their own, and the newer diverse projects who can consider accepting it. Like any other project, Tor is great at what it does well, yet those areas are *not* unlimited. This is not Kansas, it's Overlay Land, a land known to be considered for use by those with more critical / different needs than say, simply browsing the web. [Even then...] Tor users should see more disclaimer and fair honest analysis, and less blanket use case superlative coming from Tor. Indeed sad to whatever extent that does not happen.

1 0