February 2015 - cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

Learning from dpr mistakes
by David Honig 11 Feb '15

11 Feb '15

A number of public reviews of DPR's infosec mistakes have been published. I think a strong solution to the 'tackled in library' defects would be to have: 1) program to notice his magic bracelet is not near 2) program to notice that vid cam is not a head but a chaotic scene #2 is particularly easy without extra hardware (ca. 2015) You'll have to switch it off when you visit the loo. And of course, things like 'back to wall facing forward' would have been helpful. Claustophilia is a useful trait. I wish to God these calculations could be done by a steam engine," Babbage complained

3 2

Re: [tor-talk] REAL-ID Internet Access Coming Soon
by grarpamp 10 Feb '15

10 Feb '15

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Max Bond <max.o.bond(a)gmail.com> wrote: > What are you proposing we do? As before, take these issues to the realworld political front. If you're a coder, you can write all the code you want. If you're a user, you can use whatever code you want. If you're EFF/ACLU, you can publish all the press releases and fight all the cases under already written laws you want. Yet politicians generally ignore the above groups because they don't have much if any direct political action component that affects them. What's needed is a permanent political fixture and operation similar to the American NRA. These guys have a real, ongoing, political agenda and impact. Candidates are actually afraid of and responsive to the NRA's political clout... before they get elected, and before laws get enacted... not after. The NRA email, fax, letter and call trees, and their members who visit their legislators and stage in public view... are very effective. Look at the banner scroller in the upper right half of their homepage... they have a broad and deep approach to issue outreach/embedding, even a lifestyle. Labor unions and others are common examples of such organization. They all do it by leveraging large monoculture bases to politics. The NRA is 3.5M - 5.0M members strong. They turn $250M/yr from that base (manufacturers too). They have little difference of opinion in their ranks. They are good at crafting and pitching political rhetoric, framing the conversation, and rendering complex issues into simple forms that resonate with their entire base. The EFF/ACLU representing the internet are tiny in comparison. Yet the internet has a household penetration rate of 70%, more than firearms rate of 35%... so a big untapped culture there. Finding 5 million (or 2% of population) internet users should be simple task. Unfortunately, right now there are many tens of flag groups [1] mostly doing their own thing on the net. That's not good enough, and is confusingly diverse to both users and politicians. They need to join together to craft and coordinate the users under a single general banner they've been subconsciously waiting to fall in line behind, and then start firing out actionable political things for them to do. Internet users could demonstrate solidarity on issues with a typical Million User March [1]. They need to start raking in money for their war chest and to fund ongoing operations, etc. Just like the NRA... doing everything needed to become, and be, a strong integrated ongoing political force to be reckoned with. [1] Carrying the various colored flags of privacy, anonymity, free speech, freedom, copyright/filesharing, no data collecting, mining, retention or sharing, user brokered data management, surveillance, crypto, etc. The whole spectrum of related issues. https://www.nraila.org/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Rifle_Association#Political_activity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_the_United_States#Advocacy_gr… https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_the_United_States#Rights-base… https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Lobbying_organizations_in_the_United… https://www.opensecrets.org/ https://www.nra.org/ https://www.nrablog.com/ https://www.youtube.com/user/TriggerTheVote https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fight_for_the_Future https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Defense_League [ FftF/IDL are relatively dormant and reactionary than being ongoing political action ]

2 1

Re: [cryptography] [Cryptography] How the CIA Made Google
by grarpamp 09 Feb '15

09 Feb '15

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:31 PM, ianG <iang(a)iang.org> wrote: > On 31/01/2015 16:14 pm, John Young wrote: >> >> An early program of Highlands Group was perception management by >> which public opinion would be shaped by disparagement of opposition >> to ubiquitous gov-com spying with gambits like "tin-foil hat," "conspiracy >> theory," and other forms of reputation attacks. > > Sadly, these are really good tactics. They're almost costless, they really > hit hard against the auditing public, and they're almost blameless. > ... > I'd love to see evidence of the program, and I don't doubt it exists, it's > just too good to pass up on. > ... > Even if we see the evidence, the masses still won't believe it. But, > speaking for myself, knowing that there was compelling verified evidence of > actual skulduggery was something that kept me sane. Some would say the program is globalization... more delicately, a cooperation of sovereignties towards a common goal. Whether you can expect to see written evidence proofs ala Snowden depends on how much of the material in groups like the above, Bilderberg, UN, the usual suspects are recorded as opposed to being just chats. Another question is if so, what is/are the common goals? Are they planned/negotiated, or simply coming together from the subconscious. These are areas where you need wide ranging research/articles/books as in the OP taking it all in to take speculation to hypothesis to discovery of a presence, if any.

1 0

I Encourage Everyone, Right Here And Now, To Donate Money To His Three Main Security Programs, Which He Uses The Most!
by Александр 09 Feb '15

09 Feb '15

http://www.propublica.org/article/the-worlds-email-encryption-software-reli… The man who built the free email encryption software used by whistleblower > Edward Snowden, as well as hundreds of thousands of journalists, dissidents > and security-minded people around the world, is running out of money to > keep his project alive. > _______________________ I was shocked that almost nobody donates money to Werner Koch. Especially in the Post-Snowden Era. Are we so greedy/stupid/so f*cken selfish that we can not donate some money to a man, whose labor we use to protect our most sensitive information?! Hell, we buy bread, coffee and cheese and pay at the cash register, but for privacy we are unable (or rather do not want to) to pay a penny. And then we wonder, why is that great security software vanish or don't receive security updates fast enough. And whom do we blame? The NSA, the GCHQ. But it's not only them. This is us. This is our indifference, dammit! Each throws off the responsibility on the other. "Someone else will donate". Or "I have donated a year ago" (wow! And this year the developer doesn't want to eat, right?!) Our enemies are investing billions into breaking down these programs/protocols which are designed to protect us (GPG, Tor, OTR, Tails, VeraCrypt, Jitsi etc.). And? It turns out, that the developers of these great programs don't have enough money even for the bare minimum! It is a shame! I encourage everyone, right here and now, to donate some money to his three main security programs, which he uses the most. And donate at least once a year. There is nothing to discuss. "Just Do It". Alexander.

3 2

What the dear NSA allegedly mean by "Mystic site"?
by Georgi Guninski 08 Feb '15

08 Feb '15

>From cryptome: http://cryptome.org/2013/11/snowden-tally.htm 19 May 2014 12 Various Pages 12 http://cryptome.org/2014/05/nsa-intercept-14-0519.pdf p. 2 of the pdf: "Approx 10-15 SIGINT reports pers week from "Mystic sites" other than Sca....." 1. What does "Mystic site" mean to the dear NSA? 2. Is "site" in the usual computer sense?

3 3

OpenBSD 2015 Fundraising Campaign
by why not 08 Feb '15

08 Feb '15

Hello, I just want to spread the word a little bit by saying the OpenBSD 2015 Fundraising Campaign webpage is out with new hopes: http://www.openbsdfoundation.org/campaign2015.html Have a safe day.

1 0

ODNI Counsel: Governments Want Accessible Crypto from Business
by John Young 08 Feb '15

08 Feb '15

ODNI counsel Robert Litt is "optimistic" cryptographers will devise secure encryption which provides government access, it's "what many governments want." "One of the many ways in which Snowden's leaks have damaged our national security is by driving a wedge between government and providers and technology companies so that some companies that formerly recognized that protecting our nation was a valuable and important public service they could perform now feel compelled to stand in opposition." http://cryptome.org/2015/02/odni-litt-15-0204.pdf

4 4

healthcare & wearables
by brian carroll 08 Feb '15

08 Feb '15

(who says assassination politics is not alive & well..) Industry professionals create framework for measuring HIT value http://www.fiercehealthit.com/story/industry-professionals-create-framework… "Healthcare professionals have created a framework for measuring health information technology with a goal of making "HIT evaluations more relevant to the current needs of the healthcare system," according to a paper published at the American Journal of Managed Care..."

1 0

OnionShare - what do you think about this piece of software?
by Александр 07 Feb '15

07 Feb '15

https://github.com/micahflee/onionshare https://onionshare.org/ Well, it's too "young", but it's OpenSource and the idea is good. any thoughts?

5 7

Confidant Mail binaries for TAILS and MacOS
by Mike Ingle 07 Feb '15

07 Feb '15

Confidant Mail 0.20 is available at http://www.confidantmail.org No major functional changes, but there are ready to run binaries for TAILS Live CD 1.2.3 and MacOS 10.9 Confidant Mail is an encrypted, and optionally Tor-anonymized, email system supporting large file transfers. Mike Ingle <mike(a)confidantmail.org> d2b89e6f95e72e26e0c917d02d1847dfecfcd0c2

1 0