- cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

<nettime> Interview with Lavabit's Ladar Levison
by Eugen Leitl 12 Aug '13

12 Aug '13

----- Forwarded message from nettime's secret court staffer <nettime(a)kein.org> ----- Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 23:26:02 +0200 From: nettime's secret court staffer <nettime(a)kein.org> To: nettime-l(a)mx.kein.org Subject: <nettime> Interview with Lavabit's Ladar Levison Reply-To: a moderated mailing list for net criticism <nettime-l(a)mail.kein.org> On an phone interview with CNET and Jesse Binnall, Levison's Virginia-based attorney, about the decision to shutter Lavabit, Levison spoke about the connection between Lavabit and the Patriot Act, how he thinks the laws regarding privacy ought to change, and how the American government is failing to uphold the U.S. Constitution. http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57597954-83/lavabit-chief-predicts-long-fi… __What's the key issue here? Why did you shut down Lavabit? Levison: For me it wasn't about protecting a single user, but protecting the privacy of all my users, coupled with the fact that I wasn't able to discuss it publicly. I believe that people have the right to know what their government is doing. I had an issue with me doing what they wanted me to do without them disclosing it. We've had a couple of dozen court orders served to us over the past 10 years, but they've never crossed the line... __Until now? Levison: I can neither confirm nor deny "until now." Are you familiar with the case of Aaron Swartz, familiar with the accusations of prosecutorial misconduct? There may be parallels between that case and this. __If you could write the legislation covering privacy and electronic communication, what would it say? Levison: One of the things that would be nice to come out of this would be that the court shouldn't be able to make binding decisions that are secret. If there's going to be legislation from the bench, so to speak, it needs to be open to review from the American public. Just the idea of secret laws, so to speak, bothers me tremendously. That should almost be a constitutional change. We've shown that some of our most important freedoms can't be trusted to Congress, they need to be placed in the Constitution. Going beyond that, as an Internet service provider, there needs to be a more clear definition of our protections. Right now, as a third-party litigation, we effectively have no rights. There's no legal framework that we can fight with or against anything that is unjust. They're abusing their secrecy to hide their surveillance methods. I think that there's a lot more that will come out, and that needs to come out. I obviously can't tell you what was happening and what I know, and I was uncomfortable with it. I'd rather shut down my service and my primary source of income than be complicit in crimes against the American people. __In the current situation, are there any bright red lines that you wouldn't cross? Levison: It's unfortunate that even our own lawmakers don't have a good understanding of what's going on. Philosophically, I put myself in a position that I was comfortable turning over the information that I had. I built Lavabit in a reaction to the original Patriot Act. I didn't want to be in a position to turn [user data] over without judicial review. Where the government would hypothetically cross the line is to violate the privacy of all of my users. This is not about protecting a single person or persons, it's about protecting all my users. What level of access to this nation does the government have? __How did the Patriot Act influence your e-mail service? It played a big role in how I designed the custom platform. All I needed when somebody registers was a name and a password. I didn't need a real name, address, social security number, credit card number... Why should I collect that info if I didn't need it? [That philosophy] also governed what kind of information I logged. Speaking philosophically, I think people who hold other people's private information and money have an obligation to be more open to the public. That principle of openness has become a key issue. It's definitely become an issue as it relates to some of the recent coverage in the media. The current administration is not being transparent and open about what it is they're doing, even to members of Congress. __How have Lavabit's users reacted? Levison: It's overwhelmingly positive. Some of them are understandably frustrated that I had to shut down without notice. I lost my one and only e-mail account over the past 10 years, as well. I feel my decision was the lesser of two evils. __What happens to your customer's e-mails and data? Levison: I'm looking into setting up a site where users can download their data and set up a forwarding [e-mail] address, but that may take a week or two to set up. That's all I can do until I feel confident that I can resume the service without having to compromise its integrity. I will make it clear that I don't plan to use any encryption for that site. [People] should only use it if they feel comfortable with the information being intercepted. And yes, I do plan to have that disclaimer on the site. Unfortunately, what's become clear is that there's no protections in our current body of law to keep the government from compelling us to provide the information necessary to decrypt those communications in secret. I'm still looking at seeing if that's even logistically feasible -- there's half a billion messages [sent in the 10 years Lavabit operated]. By shutting down the service, I will be losing the infrastructure that I used to support all those people. There's stuff that I can't share with my own lawyer. This is going to be a long fight. __What made Lavabit successful? Levison: Lavabit at the time of the shutdown had 410,000 users, with 40,000 weekly log-ins, 200,000 e-mails sent a day -- 1.4 million e-mails a week. We were in a very narrow category of what I like to call medium-sized providers. Once you get over the 50,000 to 100,000 user threshold, e-mail becomes a very difficult problem of scale. It's why you see so many e-mail providers come and go. We managed to break through that barrier by building a custom platform to handle it. It's similar in architecture to some of the big guys [Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft, which combined provide Web mail to more than 1 billion people]. __How did Lavabit get started? Levison: I've been a geek my entire life. I was with a group of college friends of mine, that was how an e-mail service by geeks, for geeks, came about. [It was called] Nerdshack, with an emphasis on security and privacy. It had POP and IMAP access. For a long time we were the only free POP service. __How do you identify yourself politically? Levison: I'm a conservative Republican. I believe in small government and keeping our government out of our business. But I'm from California, and if there's one thing we love in California, it's being able to speak our mind. I love God and guns, too. Texans are big on freedom. I'm probably a blend of [California and Texas] at this point. # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime(a)kein.org ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://ativel.com http://postbiota.org AC894EC5: 38A5 5F46 A4FF 59B8 336B 47EE F46E 3489 AC89 4EC5

1 0

[tt] NS 2929: Meshnet activists rebuilding the internet from scratch
by Eugen Leitl 12 Aug '13

12 Aug '13

----- Forwarded message from Frank Forman <checker(a)panix.com> ----- Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 22:02:47 +0000 (GMT) From: Frank Forman <checker(a)panix.com> To: Transhuman Tech <tt(a)postbiota.org> Subject: [tt] NS 2929: Meshnet activists rebuilding the internet from scratch NS 2929: Meshnet activists rebuilding the internet from scratch http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21929294.500-meshnet-activists-rebuil… * 08 August 2013 by Hal Hodson Worried about the NSA snooping on your email? Maybe you need to start creating your own personal internet THE internet is neither neutral nor private, in case you were in any doubt. The US National Security Agency can reportedly collect nearly everything a user does on the net, while internet service providers (ISPs) move traffic according to business agreements, rather than what is best for its customers. So some people have decided to take matters into their own hands, and are building their own net from scratch. Across the US, from Maryland to Seattle, work is underway to construct user-owned wireless networks that will permit secure communication without surveillance or any centralised organisation. They are known as meshnets and ultimately, if their designers get their way, they will span the country. Dan Ryan is one of the leaders of the Seattle Meshnet project, where sparse coverage already exists thanks to radio links set up by fellow hackers. Those links mean that instead of communicating through commercial internet connections, meshnetters can talk to each other through a channel that they themselves control. Each node in the mesh, consisting of a radio transceiver and a computer, relays messages from other parts of the network. If the data can't be passed by one route, the meshnet finds an alternative way through to its destination. Ryan says the plan is for the Seattle meshnet to extend its coverage by linking up two wireless nodes across Lake Union in downtown Seattle. And over the country at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, student Alexander Bauer is hoping to build a campus meshnet later this year. That will give his fellow students an alternative communications infrastructure to the internet. While these projects are just getting off the ground, a mesh network in Catalonia, Spain, is going from strength to strength. Guifi was started in the early 2000s by Ramon Roca, an Oracle employee who wanted broadband at his rural home. The local network now has more than 21,000 wireless nodes, spanning much of Catalonia. As well as allowing users to communicate with each other, Guifi also hosts web servers, videoconferencing services and internet radio broadcasts, all of which would work if the internet went down for the rest of the country. So successful is the community model that Guifi is now building physical fibre-optic links to places like hospitals and town halls where it can help carry the heaviest traffic. Earlier this month, the General Hospital in the Catalan town of Gurb was wired up to Guifi with a fibre-optic link, and cable is being rolled out into the nearby town of Calldetenes too. In the US, people can generally already get online with relative ease, so meshnets there are less about facilitating access and more about security, privacy and net neutrality - the idea that ISPs should treat all traffic equally, and not charge more for certain types. After the extent of the NSA's clandestine PRISM program was revealed, privacy advocates like the Electronic Frontier Foundation urged users to start using relatively simple email encryption programs like Pretty Good Privacy and GNU Privacy Guard. But even those can be daunting to set up. A better idea would be a decentralised network that relies on encryption by default. This is the case with Hyperboria, the virtual layer that underpins meshnet efforts in the US. Hyperboria is a virtual meshnet because it runs through the existing internet, but is purely peer-to-peer. This means people who use it exchange information with others directly over a completely encrypted connection, with nothing readable by any centralised servers. When physical meshnet nodes like those in Maryland and Seattle are set up, existing Hyperboria connections can simply be routed through them. At the moment, Hyperboria offers a blogging platform, email services, and even forums similar to reddit. Encryption is the starting point. Computer researcher Caleb James DeLisle wrote software called cjdns which allows the Seattle Meshnet nodes to use Hyperboria and keep all communications between them encrypted. Instead of letting other computers connect to you through a shared IP address which anyone can use, cjdns only lets computers talk to one other after they have verified each other cryptographically. That means there is no way anyone can be intercepting your traffic. The Seattle Meshnet has just completed a successful crowdfunding campaign for meshboxes - routers that come preloaded with the cjdns software needed to join Hyperboria. Users will just plug the routers into their existing internet connection and be ready to go on the virtual meshnet - or a local physical meshnet when one becomes available. Some form of encryption is already in use across much of the internet, but to be useful it has to be ubiquitous. Web services like Gmail, for example, let you log in using an encrypted connection. But when you send an email it leaves Google's encrypted garden and hits the open web in clear text for anyone to read. With Hyperboria's peer-to-peer connections, every single link in the chain of communication is fully encrypted. Intermediaries that handle traffic cannot even see what kind of traffic it is, let alone read any email. Use the purpose-built hyperboria.name email service, and your communication becomes untraceable. Instead of a few established players building network infrastructure, DeLisle wants anyone to be able to do it. For him, decentralised internet access in the hands of the people is just a start. The services they use must be decentralised, too. "If people continue to use Facebook, they will continue to be spied on, that's just the reality of the world." Into the darknet Visions of a decentralised internet come with a seedier side - the darknet. One way to access it is through the anonymising routing service Tor, which lets a user find hidden web pages that have .onion addresses, rather than IP addresses. But anonymisation like this can facilitate otherwise unacceptable activities. Illegal drug market, Silk Road can only be accessed using its .onion address. But Alexander Bauer, who works on a meshnet in Maryland thinks meshnets are less likely to carry this content. Any website that can successfully run on a meshnet must be socially acceptable to every peer they connect with, making it less attractive for child pornographers or websites like Silk Road. "That's why we don't think the network will be taken over by child porn. You have to have someone accept what's on your node in order for them to pass your traffic around," he says. _______________________________________________ tt mailing list tt(a)postbiota.org http://postbiota.org/mailman/listinfo/tt ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://ativel.com http://postbiota.org AC894EC5: 38A5 5F46 A4FF 59B8 336B 47EE F46E 3489 AC89 4EC5

1 0

<nettime> Adam Curtis: BUGGER
by Eugen Leitl 12 Aug '13

12 Aug '13

----- Forwarded message from nettime's_orchid_man <nettime(a)kein.org> ----- Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 22:23:00 -0100 From: nettime's_orchid_man <nettime(a)kein.org> To: nettime-l(a)kein.org Subject: <nettime> Adam Curtis: BUGGER Reply-To: a moderated mailing list for net criticism <nettime-l(a)mail.kein.org> < http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/adamcurtis/posts/BUGGER> BUGGER: MAYBE THE REAL STATE SECRET IS THAT SPIES AREN'T VERY GOOD AT THEIR JOBS AND DON'T KNOW VERY MUCH ABOUT THE WORLD Thursday 8 August 2013, 17:31 Adam Curtis The recent revelations by the whistleblower Edward Snowden were fascinating. But they -- and all the reactions to them -- had one enormous assumption at their heart. That the spies know what they are doing. It is a belief that has been central to much of the journalism about spying and spies over the past fifty years. That the anonymous figures in the intelligence world have a dark omniscience. That they know what's going on in ways that we don't. It doesn't matter whether you hate the spies and believe they are corroding democracy, or if you think they are the noble guardians of the state. In both cases the assumption is that the secret agents know more than we do. But the strange fact is that often when you look into the history of spies what you discover is something very different. It is not the story of men and women who have a better and deeper understanding of the world than we do. In fact in many cases it is the story of weirdos who have created a completely mad version of the world that they then impose on the rest of us. I want to tell some stories about MI5 -- and the very strange people who worked there. They are often funny, sometimes rather sad -- but always very odd. The stories also show how elites in Britain have used the aura of secret knowledge as a way of maintaining their power. But as their power waned the "secrets" became weirder and weirder. They were helped in this by another group who also felt their power was waning -- journalists. And together the journalists and spies concocted a strange, dark world of treachery and deceit which bore very little relationship to what was really going on. And still doesn't. [image: Secret Squirrel] PROLOGUE -- SALISBURY PLAIN 1991 In January 1991, as the Gulf War began, MI5 became convinced they had discovered a secret Iraqi terror organisation based in Britain. They had found a list of thirty three Iraqis who were studying for PhDs in London. The list had been sent by the Iraq embassy in London to the Bank of England to ask the Bank not to freeze the grants the students lived on. The Bank sent the list to MI5 and the agents quickly realised that actually they were looking at something far worse -- a nationwide Iraqi military terror cell. The reason they knew this was because the person who sent the list was the deputy military attache at the embassy. Immediately the police were told to swoop on the 33 "students" -- and they were taken to a disused military camp at Rollestone in the middle of Salisbury plain and interned as prisoners of war. They were surrounded by two levels of high security razor wire and guarded by a hundred heavily armed soldiers. It was the first time anyone had been held like this in Britain since the Second World War. [movie] In fact the letter showed nothing of the kind. The Iraqi military attache was also in charge of administering student grants for Iraqis studying in Britain. Some of them did get funding from the Iraqi military -- for studying things like the structure of polymers. But, as a British professor pointed out, if that same interpretation were applied to British science students, over half of them would be immediately re-classified as terrorists. Here is part of a programme made later that year about the absurdity of what happened. It shows how neither the detainees or their lawyers were even allowed to know what the evidence was that had led to them being imprisoned. The man who defends MI5 with such fervor will turn up later in this story -- playing a very odd role. he is called Nigel West -- but his real name is Rupert Allason. I've added on the news reports of the same Iraqis suddenly being released from the heavily fortified camp. But now everyone is referring to them as "students". [movie] An inquiry was held later that year into the scandal. It asked MI5 to produce its evidence. Other than the letter, the secret agents came up with nothing. They had imagined the whole thing. But they justified it by saying "It was best to err on the side of caution". NEARLY A HUNDRED YEARS EARLIER THE DAILY MAIL CIRCULATION DEPARTMENT 1906 William Le Queux was a popular novelist in the early part of the twentieth century. He was half French, half British and he wrote books with wonderful titles like Strange Tales of a Nihilist. [image: Strange Tales of a Nihilist] Le Queux had started off as a journalist on the Daily Mail -- but then had travelled around Europe getting to know lots of famous and infamous people. But as he did so he became convinced that many of the European countries, but most of all Germany, envied Britain and wanted to get their hands on the wealth of the Empire. The trouble was that the British people didn't realise this. So Le Queux set out to warn them -- above all by telling them that the Germans were sending spies to Britain to prepare for an invasion. [image: Le Queux book covers] But the ruling classes in Britain laughed at Le Queux. They said it was just fiction -- which it was. Plus he wasn't really British and he hadn't been to a proper school, he was far too vulgar and insistent in his patriotism. In short he was a bore. So Le Queux did what anyone in their right mind would do in such a situation. He turned to the Daily Mail. He wrote a gripping account of a future German invasion of Britain and took it to Lord Northcliffe who ran the Mail. It was called "The Invasion of 1910" and it described how the Germans landed in East Anglia and marched on London. Northcliffe loved it -- but the Mail's circulation department said that many of the towns on Le Queux's invasion route didn't have many actual or potential Daily Mail readers in them. So Lord Northcliffe changed the route of the invasion to make sure that all the towns that were sacked and pillaged had lots of Daily Mail readers. Here is the map of the invasion as agreed with the circulation department. [image: Le Quex map] The serialisation was an enormous success. The prime minister got up in the House of Commons and said Le Queux was "a pernicious scaremonger" and that the story was "calculated to alarm the more ignorant public opinion at home." Result. Then things started getting out of control. Thousands of Daily Mail readers sent Le Queux letters telling him that they had spotted people acting suspiciously -- which meant they must be German spies. The letters were mirror images of what Le Queux had written in his books. But rather than making him suspicious, Le Queux decided that this proved that what he had written as fiction must actually be true. There was a gigantic German spy ring in Britain. Thousands of Daily Mail readers couldn't be wrong. The man whose job it was to uncover spies in Britain was very excited by all this. he was called Colonel Edmonds. He had a tiny budget and two assistants -- and noone on the General Staff bothered with him. But now Col. Edmonds saw his chance. He teamed up with Le Queux and together they bombarded the Committee for Imperial Defence with the evidence from the Daily Mail readers. Edmonds said that the government should set up a "secret service bureau" to combat the threat. The head of the Committee -- Lord Haldane -- said this was ridiculous. But even he couldn't stand against the wave of spy fever that was sweeping the country. He gave in -- and MI5 was set up -- created in large part by the dreams of a socially excluded novelist, and the paranoid imaginings of the readers of the Daily Mail. [image: Le Quex title page, Spies of the Kaiser] But the problem for MI5 was that the spy network didn't exist. The Germans did have some agents in Britain -- but nothing like the 5000 that Le Queux had described. When war against Germany was declared in 1914 -- MI5 immediately rounded up 21 alleged German spies and proudly announced they had broken the network. But a brilliant piece of historical research by the historian Nicholas Hiley has shown that this wasn't true. Hiley doesn't mince his words. Here are his conclusions (Kell and Holt Wilson were the director and deputy directors): "One of the most famous successes of the British Security Service was its great spy round-up of August 1914. The event is still celebrated by MI5, but a careful study of the recently-opened records show it to be a complete fabrication -- MI5 created and perpetuated this remarkable lie. The great spy round-up of August 1914 never took place -- as it was a complete fabrication designed to protect MO5(G) from the interference of politicians or bureaucrats. The claim made next day that all but one had been arrested was false, and its constant repetition by Kell and Holt-Wilson was a lie." In other words -- MI5 had followed the shining example of William Le Queux and made it all up. But that didn't matter -- because it made a great story, and journalists loved it. Even in 1997 the BBC made a breathless documentary -- using the recently released files -- about how in 1914 MI5 had brilliantly rounded up the Kaiser's spy network on the eve of the first world war. Aside from perpetuating a fiction, the film has two great moments -- one is an interview with the grandson of the deputy head of MI5 who has an immortal line about his grandfather -- "of course he was very private about MI5 -- so the family knew nothing". And the end the programme has some wonderful stills of the party MI5 held to celebrate the end of the war -- it's on their rooftop. Their faces are great. [movie] After the first world war MI5 declined in importance. But with the growing fears of communism in the 1920s and 30s a new threat emerged - not just communist agents from abroad, but British communists who might betray their own country. In many cases they came from the same upper classes as those running the secret services. And a strange dance began -- of toffs suspecting toffs. But even then MI5 couldn't get it right. Take the case of Cecil Day Lewis -- who was Daniel Day Lewis' father. Back in the 1930s he was a teacher at Cheltenham College -- one of the great Victorian public schools. But, despite his job, Cecil was convinced that he was really a revolutionary. And in 1933 he decided to foment revolutionary action in Britain -- by writing a poem. It was an epic he called "The Magnetic Mountain". He said his aim was to create "A violently revolutionary poem with abundant images (for example) of a barren, cancerous land led by 'getters not begetters', demanding 'It is now or never, the hour of the knife/ The break with the past, the major operation." Here is Cecil Day-Lewis looking both poetic and radical -- alongside some of the poem -- (you can see where Daniel Day Lewis gets it all from). [image: Cecil Day Lewis with poem] But Day-Lewis was disappointed by the lack of reaction. He admitted that the poem "did not create the slightest ripple of outrage amongst the guardians of Cheltenham." Even though the communist magazine -- the Partisan Review -- had said that it was "perhaps the most important revolutionary poem as yet written by an Englishman". And then MI5 noticed Cecil Day-Lewis. Not because of the poem -- but because he had sent ?5 as a donation to the headquarters of the Communist Party in London. So MI5 decided to put Day-Lewis under intense surveillance. The historian James Smith has written a wonderful book about how MI5 spent a lot of time covertly watching many upper class British writers between 1930 and 1960. It is a great book because what it records is a strange and confused dance of manners among different parts of the British elite. Smith describes how MI5 got the local police to spend weeks watching Day-Lewis' house and intercepting his post. But they found nothing suspicious. Their report said that: "Day-Lewis seldom wears a hat, and is not altogether of smart appearance in dress. He is a good singer. He has moved into his cottage after having considerable structural improvements done there." MI5 were completely incompetent. They didn't discover the poem that Day-Lewis hoped would help to bring about a communist uprising in Britain. And not only did they miss the poem -- they didn't even realise he was a poet. All in all MI5 found nothing dangerous or revolutionary about Cecil Day-Lewis. It was humiliating. But they might have been right. James Smith describes how a few years later in 1940 Cecil Day Lewis was getting his mistress Rosamund Lehmann to pull strings in the British establishment so he could avoid getting called up to go and fight the fascists. [image: MI5 vol 1 secret] But in 1940 MI5 had its greatest success. It not only found a real German spy network in Britain -- but managed to persuade many of the German agents to switch sides. It was called the Double-Cross system -- and it is celebrated in histories of MI5 as a brilliant use of espionage. The German agents carried on spying for their masters in Berlin -- sending back detailed reports. But the information was all fake, designed to mislead and confuse the Nazis. But something else happened to all the intelligence agencies during the war -- MI6 as well as MI5. As they grew massively in size they became riddled with factions and infighting. And because all this happened behind a wall of secrecy, there was little to stop things becoming vicious and poisonous. The journalist Phillip Knightley has written a really good history of spies -- called The Second Oldest Profession. In it he quotes an agent describing what happened during the war years: "The whole organisation was riddled with nepotism -- dim, dreary people of utter unmemorability; sub-men who were doubled up with other sub-men to create an illusion of strength and only doubled the weakness; others made memorable only by poisonous, corrupt malevolence or crass, mulish stupidity; the whole run by a chain of command remarkable for its feebleness. The entire service was decrepit and incompetent." At the end of the war the new Labour government knew that something had to be done to sort out MI5. So they went and found Percy Sillitoe -- who was running a sweet shop in Eastbourne [image: Sillitoe] Sillitoe had retired after being Chief Constable of Glasgow -- where he had become famous as the only policeman brave enough to take on the "Razor Gangs" in the eastern part of the city. The gangs had names like The Bingo Boys and The Baltic Fleet -- and they terrorised Glasgow as they fought each other with hatchets, swords, open razors -- and razor blades stitched into the brims of their hats. You can get a sense of Sillitoe from this short film where he shows the BBC a new kind of armoured car he has invented to stop criminals holding up vans carrying cash. He invented the security van. I very much like how he says he is "concerned for the little man". I've also added an odd bit from a BBC film about graphology where the expert -- a "psycho-graphologist" -- analyses Percy Sillitoe's signature, and compares it to J Edgar Hoover's signature. Hoover was Sillitoe's American counterpart. [movie] The government asked Sillitoe to come and sort out the chaos in MI5 - and he agreed. But he quickly found that it was a very odd place -- all the insiders hated him, and they ridiculed him by speaking in Latin (which he didn't understand) in front of him. Plus they deliberately gave him the wrong papers when he went to see the Prime Minister. Sillitoe came back and told his wife -- "I sometimes think I am working in a madhouse." But he realised that he was dealing with very much the same situation that he had found in the slums of Glasgow -- different factions locked together in a strange, poisonous bubble. Here is a section of a very good film, made much later, about the successors to the razor gangs of Glasgow -- the gangs that Sillitoe had tried to suppress in the 1930s. And you can see the similarity to the world of the spies -- as one of the gang members puts it, "it's two ends of the same street at war with each other". I also love the pigeon-fancier who shows off the most high-security pigeon loft you have ever seen. He then reveals that he doesn't breed the pigeons for racing. Their job is to go and kidnap the pigeons from the other gangs. [movie] But before Sillitoe could do anything, it all went terribly wrong. Suddenly traitor after traitor was revealed in the very heart of the British establishment. It wasn't just pretentious radical poets who were a threat -- it was spies, diplomats and nuclear scientists within the system itself who had been giving away secrets to the Russians. There was a high-flying diplomat called Donald McLean, a nuclear scientist at the heart of Britain's atomic bomb project called Klaus Fuchs, plus two of MI6's top agents -- Guy Burgess and Kim Philby. One of MI5's main jobs was to find traitors -- but the awful truth was that it had failed to spot any of them. Percy Sillitoe was booted out. But things got even worse. In 1964 MI5 were told that one of their own men had been a spy for the Russians. He was called Sir Anthony Blunt -- and not only had he been high-up in MI5 -- but he had gone on to work in Buckingham Palace looking after the Queen's art collection. And even worse than that he was the Queen Mother's cousin. [image: Anthony Blunt] MI5 interrogated Sir Anthony and he calmly said that it was all true - he had been a traitor. MI5 was so embarrassed that they kept it all quiet, gave Blunt immunity from prosecution, and he carried on working at Buckingham Palace. The Daily Mail later said that the Royal Family had known all along anyway. That as far back as 1948 Sir Alan Lascelles -- the most senior aide to the Royal family -- had whispered "that's our Russian spy" to someone else as they passed Blunt in the palace. But that could have been a misinterpretation. Blunt had shocked the Queen Mother by telling her that he was an atheist -- and she had immediately assumed that meant he must be a communist. Clever Queen Mother -- wrong but right. Blunt had also become a bit of a TV star. Starting in the early 60s the BBC went to him regularly to take the viewers on a tour of the treasures of Buckingham Palace -- a sort of early Fiona Bruce. Here is part of one programme from 1962 -- two years before he was exposed as a traitor. Followed by a bit of another programme from 1972 -- when a self-confessed KGB agent takes the viewers round Buckingham palace. Spot the difference. And at the end there is footage from 1979 -- when Blunt was exposed as a traitor. It's from some rushes I found in the library. The press chasing Sir Anthony are straight out of a British movie. And I love the interviewer's obsession that it was Blunt's "homosexual leanings" that made him betray his country. Blunt, though, doesn't bat an eyelid. It's as though he is still talking about some painting. [movie] Then, in 1971, MI5 got another big shock to the system. Most of their opponents -- Russian secret agents in Britain -- were kicked out, leaving MI5 with little to do. The irony was that it happened as a result of one of their few successes. In August 1971 an ordinary London policeman arrested a man who was driving drunkenly down Tottenham Court Road. He turned out to be Oleg Lyalin who was a KGB agent. Lyalin spent a lot of his time buying socks in the West Midlands -- pretending to be a member of the Soviet Trade delegation. But really he was spying. Lyalin panicked and offered to tell MI5 the names of all the Russian spies in Britain. In return he wanted to stay and live in Britain with his mistress. MI5 agreed -- and the Home Secretary expelled 105 other members of the trade delegation, because Lyalin said they were spies. Here are the reports -- plus a "News Special" which is an early example of the way TV journalism would report the hidden world of spying. It's got an anonymous British "research scientist" called "Jim Walker" who got caught up in all this -- and has some great MI5 surveillance footage of Jim and his controller Viktor leaving information at a "dead letter drop." Plus a very good telephone non-interview with the British Ambassador in Moscow. [movie] But the problem for MI5 is that the expulsions pretty much destroyed the KGB presence in Britain. The historian Stephen Dorril who has written a series of brilliant detailed histories of the intelligence agencies says that a later KGB defector called Oleg Gordievsky admitted that "the London residency never recovered from the expulsions". Dorril also says that the British government and its civil servants were well aware of this, and they became deeply suspicious of claims from MI5 and it's K Branch -- whose job was to monitor foreign agents - that there was still a big Soviet threat in Britain: "Senior civil servants dealing with the intelligence community were therefore aware that K Branch claims about the penetration of British political life and the threat to security from Soviet bloc operations were generally exaggerated." The brutal fact was that by the early 1970s MI5 not only had very little to do -- but also it's political masters were beginning to question whether it might be seriously incompetent. Edward Heath -- who had been Prime Minister when all this was happening -- later got up in the House of Commons and said bluntly what he had discovered about MI5 officers: "They talked the most ridiculous nonsense, and their whole philosophy was ridiculous nonsense. If some of them were on the tube and saw someone reading the Daily Mirror they would say -- 'Get after him, that man is dangerous, we must find out where he bought it.' " But those in charge in Britain also realised that there was nothing they could do to question or control the spies. The next prime minister in the 1970s -- Harold Wilson -- wrote a very serious book called The Governance of Britain full of long serious chapters. But when he got to chapter nine -- about THE PRIME MINISTER AND NATIONAL SECURITY This is what it looked like. [image: Wilson chapter] There are two paragraphs explaining that the prime minister has ultimate responsibility for the security agencies. And it ends with two more that simply say this: "The prime minister is occasionally questioned on matters arising out of his responsibility. His answers may be regarded as uniformly uninformative. There is no further information that can usefully or properly be added before bringing this Chapter to an end." In response to these kind of doubts and attacks MI5 turned inwards. The problem for the MI5 men -- stuck in their secret bubble -- was that they just couldn't believe that their failure was due to them being useless at their job. Not only had they failed to find any of the traitors, but operation after operation had ended in failure. And they convinced themselves that this meant there had to have been another traitor lurking somewhere in their building -- the MI5 HQ in Mayfair. They began a mad search for enemies inside the organisation itself - seeking to find more hidden traitors who could be used to explain why MI5 kept failing to do its job properly. It was the search for "Fifth Man" -- to go with the other four already exposed, Burgess, McLean, Philby and Blunt [image: MI5 building] A small group of MI5 men went to their boss and said they wanted to investigate all the past failures looking for evidence of treachery. Their boss was called Sir Roger Hollis -- and he said no. His argument was that operations often went wrong because of simple human failure, and to re-examine them on the basis that failure was evidence of treachery would tear the agency apart. Imagine what it would feel like he said to know you are being watched because a past operation you were involved with had gone wrong. "It's like the Gestapo" he said. So the small group of Mi5 agents decided he must be the traitor. Here is a picture of Roger Hollis. [image: Hollis] The small group in MI5 now became convinced that their organisation was not just penetrated by the Russians, it was actually run by a Soviet agent. They knew they had to get the truth out somehow even if it meant breaking the law. So they found a friendly journalist called Chapman Pincher and told him the hidden truth. [image: Hollis papers] Here is Chapman Pincher being interviewed on the Wogan programme about what then happened. Up to this point Pincher had been the Defence correspondent on the Daily Express. He was successful for getting "scoops" from "inside sources" -- although the historian EP Thompson said that really Chapman Pincher was: "A kind of official urinal in which ministers and intelligence and defence chiefs could stand patiently leaking." What the dissident MI5 agents now told Pincher was like super high-grade piss. Or, as he puts it in the Wogan interview, "it was like walking into an Aladdin's Cave". But what Pincher wrote was going to open the floodgates to a new kind of conspiracy journalism that still holds sway over large parts of the media imagination. Have a look at him and decide yourself -- high grade toilet or investigative journalist? Or maybe often they are the same thing? I've also included Pincher being interviewed on the TV news reports as the scandal unfolded. Everyone tries to get in on the act. The BBC presenter quotes Kim Philby as saying that Hollis wasn't very good at his job. But the presenter says that this is "ambiguous" -- and might be proof that Hollis really was a Soviet agent. [movie] The leading MI5 dissident who was leaking the information to Pincher was called Peter Wright. He was one of the most senior members of MI5 but he was also somewhat paranoid. To get a sense of Peter Wright and how he saw the world I have put together some bits of him being interviewed in the 1980s about another of his conspiracy theories. This was that the Prime Minister -- Harold Wilson -- had also been a Soviet agent. In Wright's mind much of the British establishment had been directly or indirectly taken over by the Soviet Union. He had no hard evidence for this -- but he was driven by an underlying mind-set that was going to spread throughout much of the intelligence agencies -- and journalism - over the next twenty years. This said that if you imagined the other side was doing something devilish and deceptive -- then they probably were. It meant that in the dark world of intelligence, imagination was more powerful than obvious facts. Because if you couldn't find the evidence it proved how clever the enemy had been at covering their tracks. It was a fevered romantic view of the world that would both entrance the readers of newspapers -- but would also lead the intelligence agencies into the disaster of the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq in 2003 Here is the grandaddy of that conviction -- Peter Wright. The person called Angleton he refers to was an even odder American equivalent of Wright who was high up in the CIA -- and who also was convinced Wilson was a Soviet agent. The tone of Wright's plaintive child like statement about Angleton - "he believed it -- he did" tells you a great deal about the emotions driving these strange men in their spy-bubbles. [movie] But as in all organisations -- egos started to come into play. Other MI5 agents started leaking other names to other journalists. Pincher's main rival was a writer called Nigel West. Nigel upped the stakes. He began to publish books and articles alleging that all sorts of other people had been traitors. Here he is on Nationwide in 1981 in full flow. He says that a man called Leo Long was a traitor, and then goes on to suggest that others -- including even the former Governor of Uganda, Sir Andrew Cohen -- might be traitors. It's worth looking closely at what Nigel West says about Sir Andrew Cohen -- because it shows how weird this paranoid outpouring from the secret world was becoming. When he was an undergraduate at Cambridge in the 1930s Cohen had been a member of an intellectual society called The Apostles. So had two of the spies -- Burgess and Blunt. The interviewer asks Nigel how he knows Sir Andrew might be a traitor. Nigel says: "I haven't named him (Sir Andrew) up to now because it's not known whether he was a Soviet agent. But I think it's worth saying that anybody, if you are talking about the Apostles, many of them were Soviet agents. And he would undoubtedly have been questioned since he rose to a very senior position in the Department of Overseas Development" That's it. But Nigel does have a fabulous haircut. [movie] In the early to mid 80s more and more names poured out -- all accused of being KGB agents in the heart of the British establishment. One newspaper grouped them under headings "CONFESSED" -- "PARTIALLY CONFESSED" -- "UNRESOLVED" There was one great apology "Our list of MI5 spy suspects included Cedric Belfrage who MI5 officers said had made a partial confession and we said was dead. We are glad to make it clear he is alive, never made any confession and maintains he should not have been on the MI5 list at all." And Mrs Thatcher also got involved. Because it seemed to prove to her the thing she had believed all along -- that the British establishment were weak, spineless and easily corruptible. She happily admitted in Parliament that Anthony Blunt had been a traitor. And here she is in 1986 merrily joining in with the latest accusation -- that Lord Rothschild had been the 5th Man. It later turned out that he wasn't. [movie] It became farce. The journalists who had started the mole-hunt went to war. Nigel West wrote a whole book announcing that he had discovered that the 5th man wasn't really Hollis, but was actually Hollis' deputy. He was a man called Graham Mitchell who in his spare time was a grand master in correspondence chess. Apparently the dissidents in MI5 were convinced that the letters he sent his chess-friends were his way of contacting his Soviet controllers. The moves he typed out were actually secret codes that disguised his treachery. Here is one of Graham Mitchell's games that he played in 1950. You are looking at a complicated code, whether it was secret messages to the Russians has never been proved. [image: Graham Mitchell chess] Another writer then found a letter in an old government file that had been written by Roger Hollis in the 1940s saying that the Russians shouldn't be trusted. Some journalists said that this proved he wasn't a traitor. But others said that Hollis had put the letter there deliberately so it could be found and throw MI5 off the scent. Here are the TV reports -- both of the Graham Mitchell "revelation", and the Hollis letter. The leader of the pack -- Chapman Pincher -- still insists Hollis is the 5th man. Nigel West says he is innocent. But Nigel now has a very good late 80s haircut. [movie] Then another writer called W. J. West wrote a book saying that the 5th man was Hollis after all. W J West turns out to have been an ex-hippie whose early years were memorably captured in a semi-autobiographical novel by another ex-hippie -- called "Ten Men". She describes a road trip across America as she desperately but unsuccessfully tries to shag him. Here's his book about the Fifth Man. [image: West book] But then -- in the midst of all these weirdos -- a dissenting voice emerged. James Rusbridger had been a spy back in the 50s and 60s -- and he now wrote a book called The Intelligence Game arguing that all this was rubbish -- and that all the journalists had been conned by a crazy gang of right-wing nutters in MI5. Rusbridger said that the newspapers and TV were being used to promote the obsessive belief of MI5 officers that their failure to do anything worthwhile for a quarter of a century was the consequence of there being a Russian spy in MI5. They couldn't face the fact that they were completely useless and incompetent. At last a voice of sanity. But unfortunately James Rusbridger was then found dead in his garden shed -- apparently the victim of an auto-erotic game that had gone wrong. He was naked apart from a rubber coat and a gas mask -- and his feet and legs were attached to the wall by a complicated system of pulleys. Of course it might have been a fiendishly clever assassination. Or just another spy-world weirdo. [image: Rusbridger] But this crazed witch hunt didn't harm MI5 at all. Quite the opposite - because together the spies and the journalists created an image in the public imagination of a dark world full of hidden treachery. The spy world became a fascinating other universe that was full of layer upon layer of deception, where the men who inhabited it spent their time trying to penetrate through the circles of falsehood to the inner sanctum of truth. It was an image that was powerfully helped by John Le Carre's novels - and his anti-hero George Smiley. Le Carre's novels were a clever piece of PR -- because they appeared to be more gritty and realistic than the glamourised James Bond image. But it was just another layer of deception -- because Smiley and his search for a hidden mole expressed powerfully the paranoid and unfounded fantasies of the dissident MI5 agents. But it was a world that was all made-up. Le Carre -- who had himself been a spy -- admitted this, and described what the true reality of the spy world was: "For a while you wondered whether the fools were pretending to be fools as some kind of deception, or whether there was a real efficient service somewhere else. Later in my fiction, I invented one. But alas the reality was the mediocrity. Ex-colonial policemen mingling with failed academics, failed lawyers, failed missionaries and failed debutantes gave our canteen the amorphous quality of an Old School outing on the Orient express. Everyone seemed to smell of failure." [image: Smiley covers] But this new image couldn't conceal MI5's incompetence for long. Because at the very same time that everyone was talking excitedly about completely invented moles, MI5 missed the real moles at the heart of the intelligence services -- even though they were completely obvious, and almost screaming to be noticed. Michael Bettaney worked in counter-espionage in MI5. He had been recruited when he was at Oxford university -- where he had been an admirer of Adolf Hitler and had a habit of singing the Nazi Party anthem in local pubs. Here is Bettaney back then. [image: Bettaney] MI5 did a thorough check on him -- called positive vetting -- and decided he was fine. Perfect MI5 material. Bettaney was then sent off to Northern Ireland to fight terrorism where he was wounded by a car bomb. He then had a horrible experience. Hidden in a cupboard he had to watch in silence as one of his informants was shot through the kneecaps boy other terrorists. Here is Bettaney later -- after he had been working for MI5. [image: Bettaneyi 2] Bettaney came back to London a changed man. He decided that MI5 was both corrupt and incompetent. He started drinking heavily and told his colleagues loudly that he was no longer a fascist -- but he had become a communist. So MI5 decided to promote him. He was positively vetted again -- found to be perfect MI5 material, and sent to the Russian desk. Bettaney became more and more unstable. In October 1982 he was convicted of being drunk and disorderly. The next week he was convicted for fare-dodging. Finally MI5 did begin to notice -- and two separate inquiries were set up to look into Bettaney's behaviour. But each was unaware of the other's existence. Neither of them noticed that he had been stealing a huge amount of MI5 top secret documents and stashing them at his home. Bettaney was only caught when he took some of the best of these secrets and tried to stuff them into the letter box of the Second Secretary of the Russian Embassy -- Mr Gouk. This is a picture of Mr Gouk. [image: Gouk] Mr Gouk was so confused by this that, instead of passing them on to the KGB, he went round to MI5 and gave them back, and told them where they had come from. MI5 arrested Bettaney and he was put on trial. The man who was in charge of the vetting of government employees -- like Michael Bettaney -- was then allowed to vet the members of the jury at Bettaney's trial. Luckily this time he got it right -- and Bettaney was sent to prison on the Isle of Sheppey for 23 years. Here are some of the reports. Including Nigel West turning up yet again on Breakfast Time. Even Nigel is shocked by how MI5 didn't spot Bettaney. And he's having a bad hair day. [movie] The terrible truth that began to dawn in the 1980s was that MI5 -- whose job it was to catch spies that threatened Britain -- had never by its own devices caught a spy in its entire history. The case that really shocked Mrs Thatcher was the traitor Geoffrey Prime. In the 1970s he had worked at the top secret listening centre GCHQ and had been selling all it's secrets to the Russians. [image: Prime] And yet again it wasn't MI5 who uncovered his treachery -- it was the local police in Cheltenham. In 1982 a policeman came to his house enquiring about his car -- a rather distinct two-tone brown and white Mk IV Cortina -- a which had been seen in the vicinity of an assault on a young girl. Prime told the policeman that he had been at home all day. But that evening he and his wife Rhona went for a drive to the top of Cleeve Hill. As they sat in the twilight Prime told Rhona that he was the man the police were looking for. And not only that, he was also a Russian spy. Here is part of a very powerful interview Rhona Prime gave to the BBC where she describes that day -- and what she then did. [movie] Prime was a paedophile -- and had used spying techniques to monitor the activities of thousands of young girls around Cheltenham. He had created a vast set of index cards which showed when the girls were most likely to be alone at home. He then went round to their houses in his two tone Cortina and sexually assaulted them. Despite this Prime had been positively vetted six times. Even the Russians got worried about his paedophile activities and seemed to want to dump him. In 1980 Prime had gone to Vienna to meet the KGB. Instead of meeting him secretly as they normally did, the Russians took him openly to the best restaurants where they knew Western intelligence agents would recognise them as KGB agents. But even then noone noticed them -- or Prime. Prime's wife Rhona wrestled with her conscience -- and in the end went to the police and told them everything about Prime. He was sent to jail for 35 years for spying and 3 years for the assaults on young girls - which says a lot about the priorities of the British establishment at that time. [movie] The cases of Bettaney and Prime revealed not only just how incompetent MI5 was -- but also how sad and seedy the secret world of spies really was. But even in the midst of all this treachery -- a surprising thing happened. Rhona Prime decided to stand by her husband. Here is Rhona describing how her deep christian beliefs gave her the strength to stand by her husband. She is very calm and composed, and somehow her dignity makes you realise just how odd the whole spy thing was. A strange hysteria driven by totally inadequate men -- both agents and journalists -- who were incapable of dealing with real human emotions like love and loyalty. Rhona talks about something else -- unconditional love. Receiving unconditional love, she says, makes us whole and beautiful people because we are totally accepted. The very opposite of treachery. [movie] At the same time, one of the original traitors -- Kim Philby -- died in the Soviet Union. The BBC cameraman Phil Goodwin has given me the unedited rushes recording Philby's funeral in Moscow. He found it in the back of a cupboard in the BBC's Moscow office. It's an amazing record of a weird communist state funeral -- held for an upper class Englishman in a Moscow graveyard in 1987. Standing all around are the faces of the Russian side of the spy world -- and it is great to look at their faces, peeking out for a moment from their traditional secrecy. Then Philby's coffin arrives accompanied by a military band and members of the KGB holding all Philby's Soviet medals on orange cushions. It's an extraordinary scene. But also watch the woman with red hair. She is Philby's widow -- Rufina -- who had lived with him and helped him through alcoholism and depression. Watch what Rufina does. It's really moving. Love and loyalty breaking through again into this narrow, nasty world. [movie] And even Michael Bettaney found love. Marion Johnstone, who was a research scientist and also a communist, wrote to him in prison in 1985. She began to visit him -- and they became engaged. But in 1995 there was a security scare that reawakened all the spy journalists on papers like the Mail -- and made them huff and puff again. Marion was found to have taken some photos and made some drawings of the landscape on Sheppey around the prison and given them to Bettaney. The prison authorities confiscated them, and the journalists immediately said that this was part of an escape plan to spring the traitor from jail. Marion denied this -- she insisted that because Bettaney was kept in solitary confinement she just wanted to show him how beautiful the landscape was outside. And she is right. The landscape around Bettaney's prison, Swaleside, is extraordinary and beautiful. A little while ago I managed to get onto Deadman's Island which is nearby on the river Swale. It is a moody place because it is where prisoners from a long time ago -- the Napoleonic wars of the 1800s -- were buried. They had been held on the "hulks", floating prisons off the coast of Sheppey. What makes the island so strange is that it is covered by water every high tide -- and that washes away the mud and opens up the prisoners' graves. It means that the island is littered with human bones. The warden of Deadman's Island very kindly showed me round -- and here he is showing me the open graves and the bones of prisoners, other kinds of traitors, from a very different war of long ago. [movie] But what really did for all of the intelligence agencies at the end of the eighties is that none of them predicted the collapse of communism. Mrs Thatcher's advisor -- Charles Powell -- summed up the extraordinary failure: "The biggest single failure of intelligence of that era was the failure of almost everybody to foresee the end of communism. it caught us completely on the hop. All that intelligence about their war-fighting capabilities was all very well, but it didn't tell us the one thing we needed to know -- that it was all about to collapse. It was a colossal failure of the whole Western system of intelligence assessment and political judgement." But the real reason that the intelligence agencies didn't predict the collapse of the Soviet system was because many of the people at the top of the agencies couldn't believe it was true. Sir Percy Cradock was one of the most powerful figure in the British establishment. He was the chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee -- which co-ordinated the activities of MI5, MI6 and other intelligence groups. Even at the end of the eighties when everyone else was realising that the Soviet Union was collapsing, Sir Percy remained convinced that this was all a trick. That the Soviet Union was still aiming for communist domination of the world. Here is Sir Percy [image: Percy Cradock] Cradock -- along with a number of others high up in the intelligence agencies -- really believed that Gorbachev's reforms were just a cunning ruse to deceive the West. And -- as Mark Urban has pointed out in his book UK Eyes Alpha -- Sir Percy used his position to make sure that this view dominated the Joint Intelligence Committee. But as Urban also points out -- Sir Percy and his allies had no secret evidence for this. They relied on what was pompously called "analysing open source data". Otherwise known as reading the newspapers and watching TV. Except they interpreted that data in a mad way -- driven by their own fevered imaginings of a world completely possessed by infinite levels of deception Mrs Thatcher realised this was bonkers -- and she finally gave up on the spies. And that really should have been that for MI5. Except ten years later it was saved by the War on Terror -- and since then MI5 has grown massively. But what no-one seems to know is whether MI5 has changed. For most of the twentieth century the combination of ineptitude and secrecy created an organisation that retreated more and more into a world of fictional conspiracies in order to disguise it's repeated failures. The question is whether the same is true today? Disasters like the total intelligence failure over the WMD in Iraq would suggest that nothing much had changed. But the trouble is there is no way we can ever find out. The spies live behind a wall of secrecy and when anyone tries to criticise them, the spies respond by saying that they have prevented attacks and saved us from terrible danger. But they can't show us the evidence because that is secret. It was recently revealed that back in the 1970s -- at the height of the obsession with traitors -- MI5 trained a specially bred group of Gerbils to detect spies. Gerbils have a very acute sense of smell and they were used in interrogations to tell whether the suspects were releasing adrenaline -- because that would show they were under stress and lying. Then they tried the Gerbils to see if they could detect terrorists who were about to carry a bomb onto a plane. But the gerbils got confused because they couldn't tell the difference between the terrorists and ordinary people who were frightened of flying who were also pumping out adrenaline in their sweat. So the gerbils failed as well. Perhaps MI5 shouldn't have given up so easily. Maybe what we need is a better class of gerbil to find out the truth? But maybe we have them already -- they're called journalists. [image: gerbil] But the saddest thing in this whole story is that Rhona Prime did not stay with her husband Geoffrey. In 1995 she met and fell in love with someone else. # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime(a)kein.org ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://ativel.com http://postbiota.org AC894EC5: 38A5 5F46 A4FF 59B8 336B 47EE F46E 3489 AC89 4EC5

1 0

Moonlet
by Sean Alexandre 11 Aug '13

11 Aug '13

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Moonlet >From http://moonlet.is/: --------------------------------------------------------------------- Moonlet will be a small scale personal cloud services collective. Our goal is to pool together about 20-40 peoples' resources to pay for the hosting and sysadmin time necessary to replace most or all of the cloud services we use with ones we can trust. Our goals are: * To offer cloud-replacement services at a reasonable price to members * Security and privacy are primary priorities * Ensure a useable and well-integrated solution that replicates the hassle-free convenience of the better existing cloud services * Document the process clearly so other people can replicate the experience Why The impetus for this is twofold: First, cloud providers are proving unreliable in terms of continued provision of services and respect for user privacy. Second, paying for it on one's own is either expensive in terms of time, or money. Almost all the software exists to duplicate all the cloud offerings one might want to use, but getting it up and working is time consuming. Current status As of June 2013, we are actively recruiting members to get this collective started. When we have enough people able to commit to a year of membership, we will set definitive pricing for the first year, hire an administrator and announce a launch date. How to get involved... --------------------------------------------------------------------- Moonlet FAQ >From http://eldan.co.uk/moonlet/faq.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- We are currently recruiting members. When we have enough people, we anticipate creating a legal entity to hold money, hire the sysadmin and so on. This will probably be a co-op, though details are to be confirmed. Everything that follows will be shaped by the needs of the group. Service set This set will evolve as we get feedback from members, but it will look something like: * Email, with a solid webmail interface and IMAPS (GMail) * Caldav, with a web calendar interface (Google Calendar) * Secure online https file share (Dropbox/etc.) * Encrypted backup, based on Tahoe-LAFS (Dropbox/etc.) * VPN Endpoint * Hosted to-do list (RTM/Google calendar tasks) * XMPP/Jabber (Google Talk) * VM instances (personal web hosting/other private services) * Secured etherpad lite instance (Google docs) * Shell access within VMs * Hosted RSS reader (Google Reader) * Hosted photo sharing (Flickr) * Hosted wordpress instances (Blogger/etc.) * Status.net instance (Twitter) * SIP server, with assistance in configuring ZRTP (Skype) * Wiki instances (PBWiki/etc.) * Hosted bookmarking tool (Del.icio.us/Pininterest) * Local configuration of hosted services (not tech support) * Configuration of mobile devices As we learn which are most important to people, and what the resource needs & prerequisites are for some, we will decide which to include at launch, add later or drop. For some things, for instance etherpad lite, we may decide to offer a feature bounty as a group to developers to make the software a better replacement -- in that case, to support a bit more formatting, for working on more complex documents. Some stuff, like getting a mobile device working without any public cloud accounts, may take some time and integration research, but in general, we're targeting a relatively tech-savvy audience, at least to start with. If you've already got a lot of this stuff set up, the benefit for you is that you get to not think about it any more. Hosting Tentatively, the primary hosting location will be Iceland because of its favorable legal jurisdiction and good international connectivity. We are considering a second jurisdiction for redundancy, potentially in the Netherlands. Unfortunately for North Americans, nowhere on our continent is suitable. The server(s) will be running appropriately hardened Linux installs with services segmented into VMs and encrypted physical disks and backups, etc. We'll probably recruit both a primary and a backup admin, for human fault tolerance. Costs Exact pricing will depend on both the number of people who join and the exact costs for sysadmin time and hosting. We anticipate a range of EUR50-100 per month, with a strong impetus to reach the lower end of the range. If costs come in higher than expected we may recruit a larger number of members to spread the burden. We generally favor simplicity in pricing, but may have to itemize charges for services that are costly to provide and used at wildly varying rates by different individuals - most likely backup beyond a modest initial disk quota. Discounts We are considering asking initial members to pay for a year of service in advance, to help handle setup costs, in exchange for which we will offer a discount. We anticipate prices dropping after all services have been rolled out, but can not guarantee this. We will offer some sort of group discount, but are figuring out details. If you have suggestions for how to take advantage of group signups to streamline the admin work, please let us know - the more we can achieve that, the bigger a group discount it makes sense to offer. Questions, suggestions? ...

3 4

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] [James Vasile] tinc rollout and fbox
by Eugen Leitl 11 Aug '13

11 Aug '13

----- Forwarded message from Sandy Harris <sandyinchina(a)gmail.com> ----- Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 15:37:06 -0400 From: Sandy Harris <sandyinchina(a)gmail.com> To: freedombox list <freedombox-discuss(a)lists.alioth.debian.org> Subject: Re: [Freedombox-discuss] [James Vasile] tinc rollout and fbox Nick Daly <nick.m.daly(a)gmail.com> wrote: > There's been some recent work on Tinc that I'm really excited about. > ... > Poke at it, let me know what you think. Their docs include this paragraph: " On the 15th of September 2003, Peter Gutmann posted a security analysis of tinc 1.0.1. He argues that the 32 bit sequence number used by tinc is not a good IV, that tinc’s default length of 4 bytes for the MAC is too short, and he doesn’t like tinc’s use of RSA during authentication. We do not know of a security hole in this version of tinc, but tinc’s security is not as strong as TLS or IPsec. We will address these issues in tinc 2.0. Gutmann is a well-known and respected expert. His best-known paper was one back in the 90s on reading "erased" disk drives and what bit patterns it took to block that. Most "secure erase" utilities around use those suggestions (even though current drives are quite different, so those may be inappropriate now). He has done /a lot/ of other stuff as well. The current Tinc release is 1.0.21 My reading of that is that Tinc has known problems and they probably will not be fixed soon. To me, that means it is not ready for serious consideration as a component for FreedomBox. _______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list Freedombox-discuss(a)lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://ativel.com http://postbiota.org AC894EC5: 38A5 5F46 A4FF 59B8 336B 47EE F46E 3489 AC89 4EC5

1 0

DIY Spy Germicide
by John Young 11 Aug '13

11 Aug '13

DIY Germicide: http://prism-break.org http://lockerproject.org/ https://securityinabox.org/ http://eyebeam.org/research/calls/request-for-proposals-prism-break-up

1 0

Re: [tor-talk] Secure email with limited usable metadata
by coderman 10 Aug '13

10 Aug '13

On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 4:34 AM, Mike Hearn <hearn(a)google.com> wrote: >... > You may be interested in checking out Pond... > https://pond.imperialviolet.org/ > > It is an email-like messaging system that runs over Tor, has forward > security, tries to beat traffic analysis, ... this is the kind of messaging i would use - leaving all the complexities and drawbacks of traditional email behind. and StealthMonger: while the theory and design of latest generation anonymous remailers are suitable for secure mail, the practical realities render them unusable. effort on real-time protocols that can defend against traffic analysis, or other non-email systems like pond would be better spent.

1 0

Obama On NSA 9 August 2013
by John Young 10 Aug '13

10 Aug '13

http://cryptome.org/2013/08/obama-nsa-13-0809.htm

1 0

NSA Today on Missions, Authorities, Oversight, Partnershps
by John Young 10 Aug '13

10 Aug '13

NSA statement today on Missions, Authorties, Oversight, Partnerships: http://cryptome.org/2013/08/nsa-13-0809.pdf

3 2

Re: [cryptopolitics] Silent Circle and Secure Email
by Adam Back 10 Aug '13

10 Aug '13

(Thanks for the link.) It says hushmail had a simplified web-only version (no java applet) and that the disclosure of client emails did not involve pressured code changes (at least code shipped to clients), rather that as a natural consequence of the way passwords would be processed on the server side and decryption happened on the server side so hushmail had the passwords, private keys, and decrypted plaintexts at leas in memory to hand over on request. Adam On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 08:59:53PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: >On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Adam Back <adam(a)cypherspace.org> wrote: >> ... >> >> Its less clear what lavabit were talking about. Perhaps something similar >> in terms of an SMTP interoperability encryption gap, or alternatively about >> being pressured to modify code (which people seem to assume, but I didnt see >> explicitly stated). >> >> There were some hushmail rumors about code modification some years back - >> does anyone know what actually at hushmail? >Encrypted E-Mail Company Hushmail Spills to Feds, >http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2007/11/encrypted-e-mai/.

1 0