- cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

'unsub from cryptome ml'
by Dr. J Feinstein 16 Oct '15

16 Oct '15

Same jf > >> unsubscribe > 'Unsubscribe' request denied. > Your request was rejected for the following reason: > You are not on the list 'cryptome'. > Shocker. > -Travis

4 3

Re: [cryptome] Cryptome for sale with access log files from 1996 for $50, 000, 000
by Shelley 16 Oct '15

16 Oct '15

On October 14, 2015 9:32:30 PM John Young <jya(a)pipeline.com> wrote: > Cryptome for sale with access log files from 1996 for $50,000,000. -- So, its been a day since this was posted. It appears as though neither JYA nor Cryptome have been compromised and the posts and tweets that have followed appear to be authentic JY. I've been a bit busy today, so - have I missed it? John's explanation of why he would keep access logs going back to 1996, when it was posted on Cryptome itself for years that logs were deleted daily or better - and he gave an affidavit to a grand jury stating that he had no such files? Or perhaps why he wants to sell out in the first place? If he's tired of doing it, I get it. If he wants to enjoy his remaining time on the planet instead of dealing with this BS, more power to him. But why go out this way? The legacy he has built with that site is being crushed. Without Cryptome, there would likely be no Wikileaks. No Manning, no Snowden. This isn't just about being identified in the logs, but their very existence. Those of you who insist on trying to divert the conversation away by blaming people for not being behind 7 proxies are just wasting space. We know, we preach it too! That is not the point. Personally, I don't give a fck if my info is in the log files. If I did, I surely would not be posting to public lists about it. I'm probably on enough "watch lists" already that visiting Cryptome isn't going to make a damn bit of difference. No, I'm concerned for sources that gave info and documents to Cryptome. For people in countries where they possibly face dire consequences for even viewing such info (jail, torture, even death.) It's not funny, and it's not right. From what I've heard, a bunch of us would really appreciate an explanation from John - in plain English. -Shelley

5 4

'unsub from cryptome ml'
by Travis Biehn 16 Oct '15

16 Oct '15

The glories of SMTP and the From: address. DKIM/DMARC/SPF too hard for freelists.org? Received: from freelists.org by freelists.org (ECARTIS/1.0.0); Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:17:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:17:09 -0400 (EDT) From: FreeLists Mailing List Manager <ecartis(a)freelists.org> To: tbiehn(a)gmail.com Message-ID: <ecartis-10162015101709.22136.1(a)freelists.org> X-ecartis-antiloop: freelists.org Precedence: list Expiry-Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 10:17:09 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Ecartis command results: unsubscribe Request received for list 'cryptome' via request address. >> unsubscribe 'Unsubscribe' request denied. Your request was rejected for the following reason: You are not on the list 'cryptome'. Shocker. -Travis -- Twitter <https://twitter.com/tbiehn> | LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/travisbiehn> | GitHub <http://github.com/tbiehn> | TravisBiehn.com <http://www.travisbiehn.com> | Google Plus <https://plus.google.com/+TravisBiehn>

1 0

Future True [was: Re: Truth teller or Truthiness?]
by coderman 16 Oct '15

16 Oct '15

On 10/16/15, Zenaan Harkness <zen(a)freedbms.net> wrote: > ... > A conniving reverse psychology gambit play if ever there was one... > devious I tell you all, DEVIOUS!!! > > Now the mass flocks of masses will sheepily flock in trusting sheeple > flocks to the enigmatic tome of the almighty: For-ev-er young, I wanna > be, a John Crypt-Doe. Crypto Me, right now, Zenaan! In this thread!! >From Truthiness to Authentic Truth, JYA has passed beyond - to Future Truth. it's so true, you may believe it a lie today. yet one day, the clairvoyant JYA returns vindicated. in Full Truth. for a question no one thought to think at the time. except One. remember my dear earth humans: adjust your receiver minds, for it is clearly not the signal missing in this equation! best regards,

2 1

Cryptome for sale with access log files from 1996 for $50,000,000
by John Young 16 Oct '15

16 Oct '15

Cryptome for sale with access log files from 1996 for $50,000,000. Authentic Cryptome Archive for $10,000. <https://t.co/38zMD3KlpS>https://cryptome.org/donations.htm

9 8

USB killer v2.0
by Georgi Guninski 16 Oct '15

16 Oct '15

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/10/14/sneaky_220v_usb_fries_laptops/ --- An internet mischief maker has built a USB stick that delivers dangerous 220-volt shocks to PCs, destroying them in the process. --- There is a link to russian blog from 8.oct.2015. In some thread here, jim bell wrote something like patched microwave oven can focus "energy" remotely. Does this method, if applied to desktop/laptop damages them remotely?

6 10

CYBER INTEGRITY ASSURANCE DIRECTORATE [was Re: [cryptome] Re: Cryptome for sale with access log files from 1996 for $50,000,000]
by coderman 16 Oct '15

16 Oct '15

On 10/15/15, Andrew Hornback <achornback(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Okay, I'll take the troll bait here... > > How would you go about verifying that his account has NOT been hacked? proving NOT hacked is actually technically challenging in a rigorous sense! first, you use a langsec runtime to ensure your measurements are verbatim, then... best regards,

1 0

Re: Why Mirimir outlived the canaries in the coal mine
by coderman 15 Oct '15

15 Oct '15

On 10/11/15, Mirimir <mirimir(a)riseup.net> wrote: > ... I prefer to use pseudonyms, and to hide > behind anonymity systems. I don't trust anyone or anything more than > necessary, and I totally compartmentalize online stuff from meatspace. > It limits me, I know. No credentials. No meetings. No sharing with > meatspace friends. Not many online friends. But so it goes. some of us must push the bounds, must we not? lest the measure of appropriate protection remain an abstract unknown. it's hard to tell afore how dice come down, as brave inspiration, or cautionary tale. best regards,

3 2

Re: [tor-talk] Iovation insinuates Tor Users are bad
by grarpamp 15 Oct '15

15 Oct '15

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Geoff Down <geoffdown(a)fastmail.net> wrote: > What Iovation actually *says* is that fraudsters like to conceal their > whereabouts with a variety of technologies. Nothing controversial there. But a wager they aren't also saying to their customers s/fraudsters/perfectly legit everyday privacy minded Tor users among the general public/ therefore they're insinuating Tor bad, they're biased, and they can just piss off. Further proof that companies like these could really give a shit about legit Tor using end users...every single one of them a profiteering data miner... against you and your privacy, and for them. https://www.iovation.com/about/partners

1 0

Nominee officers and directors (was: Why cryptome sold web logs...)
by wirelesswarrior＠Safe-mail.net 15 Oct '15

15 Oct '15

Despite almost two decades of cypherpunk activity I cannot fathom why U.S. residents operate sites clearly in the cross-hairs of intel agencies. Have they never heard of non-resident nominee officers and directors? All U.S. resident people dealing with the site should be bona fide contractors so they aren't subject to either receiving or implementing court orders or NSLs. -------- Original Message -------- From: bbrewer <bbrewer(a)littledystopia.net> Apparently from: cypherpunks-bounces(a)cpunks.org To: Michael Best <themikebest(a)gmail.com> Cc: cpunks <cypherpunks(a)cpunks.org>, cryptome <cryptome(a)freelists.org> Subject: Re: [cryptome] Re: Why cryptome sold web logs to their payingcustomers? Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 16:30:00 -0400 > > > On Oct 11, 2015, at 4:22 PM, Michael Best <themikebest(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Anyway to rule this out other than hearing it from John? How long before we begin to seriously consider it or assume it? > > > > And if there was a NSL, why not shut down? Why put users at ongoing risk?? > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavabit > > "Levison said that he could be arrested for closing the site instead of releasing the information, and it was reported that the federal prosecutor's office had sent Levison's lawyer an e-mail to that effect.” > > I’m just blabbering on suppositions here, but I wouldn’t be surprised by… anything. > > -benjamin

6 6