- cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

IndependentOnion / RotorBrowser / Rotor - Interview
by grarpamp 02 Sep '16

02 Sep '16

# IndependentOnion / RotorBrowser / Rotor - Interview # intro 00:06:29-00:07:51 # exclusive jmprcx from 00:12:37-00:31:27, 00:37:02-00:51:30 # ppi commentary from 00:51:30-01:02:01 https://www.spreaker.com/user/anonukire/t0pg3arliv3-rotor-torfork-new-tor-b… https://api.spreaker.com/download/episode/9283555/t0pg3arliv3_rotor_torfork… # unrelated segments 01:06:01-01:31:20, 01:34:18-01:57:00 https://rotorbrowser.com/ https://github.com/IndependentOnion https://lists.rotorbrowser.com/pipermail/rotor-general/ https://twitter.com/Jmprcx https://twitter.com/hashtag/rotor https://twitter.com/hashtag/rotorbrowser https://twitter.com/hashtag/independentonion https://ghostbin.com/paste/4am8w https://twitter.com/hashtag/torfork

2 1

distractions
by Zenaan Harkness 01 Sep '16

01 Sep '16

Whilst those with any passion for actual political anarchy (aka direct democracy) are drowned out with rather pathetic psyop attempts at steering the conversation, the space to inspire newcomers is white noise. "Oh My God! How could the CIA say such stoopid things?!" But folks need their emotional entertainment. The real questions and discussions we ought be having here - coordinating inspired groups, facilitating clarity on the fundamentals of political anarchism, these largely don't exist or are drowned out. Perhaps we don't have a current generation of "young and hungry world shakers" at the moment? Perhaps the young and hungry world shakers are too afraid to speak publicly about anything USA's "the man" will take exception to? The example set upon Jim Bell (how many years jail for simply highlighting a new concept in clear and non-inciting terms, namely Assassination Politics) presumably dampens certain .. conversations. "Prudence" becomes the collective self censorship. I'm still waiting for Rayzer to publicly backtrack on his defense of the DMV. I would never have thought that would even be contentious in a supposedly "anarchist" group, but hey...

6 12

Fwd: <nettime> Feminist Principles of the Internet
by HateSpeech 01 Sep '16

01 Sep '16

> Cecilia Tanaka: > www.feministinternet.net Fuck your feminist (otherist) principals.

1 0

Google App Store Takedown Process
by Wilfred L. Guerin 01 Sep '16

01 Sep '16

Google App Store Takedown Process? First, does anyone have an example of App store export restriction takedown process, especially for including encryption libraries? Second, where are any lists of all encryption and encoding functions, especially all the various NIST and russian submissions and older (1950s-1980s) techniques?

1 1

Typical thread on cpunks (Was: Wodka xor Viskii)
by ListBaby 01 Sep '16

01 Sep '16

> Georgi Guninski: > Typical thread on cpunks > .us >> cunt > .ru >> scumbag > end of convo >> double end convo^2 >>> love, love, love & kisses. 8 <- o|o > marxist >> cunt^2 > scumbag^3 >>> love & orgasms >> capitalist swine > shit >> shit^2 > end of convo^3 >> the convo ended > shit >> cunt^5 > quadratic cunt >> ellipsoid cunt > wodka!! >> viskii!! You forgot fucker, fucker.

1 0

Typical thread on cpunks (Was: Wodka xor Viskii)
by ListBaby 01 Sep '16

01 Sep '16

> Georgi Guninski: > Typical thread on cpunks > .us >> cunt > .ru >> scumbag > end of convo >> double end convo^2 >>> love, love, love & kisses. 8 <- o|o > marxist >> cunt^2 > scumbag^3 >>> love & orgasms >> capitalist swine > shit >> shit^2 > end of convo^3 >> the convo ended > shit >> cunt^5 > quadratic cunt >> ellipsoid cunt > wodka!! >> viskii!! You forgot fucker, fucker.

1 0

Typical thread on cpunks (Was: Wodka xor Viskii)
by Georgi Guninski 01 Sep '16

01 Sep '16

Typical thread on cpunks Subject: Wodka xor Viskii? ( ">"s truncated) > .us >> cunt > .ru >> scumbag > end of convo >> double end convo^2 >>> love, love, love & kisses. 8 <- o|o > marxist >> cunt^2 > scumbag^3 >>> love & orgasms >> capitalist swine > shit >> shit^2 > end of convo^3 >> the convo ended > shit >> cunt^5 > quadratic cunt >> ellipsoid cunt > wodka!! >> viskii!!

2 1

Fwd: <nettime> Feminist Principles of the Internet
by Cecilia Tanaka 01 Sep '16

01 Sep '16

Juan, my love, dear 'mal cogido' of my life, Did I mention today how much I adore you? *-* With all my love and tenderness, ow! <3 Ceci -- "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "nettime's token feminist" <nettime(a)kein.org> Date: Aug 31, 2016 10:44 AM Subject: <nettime> Feminist Principles of the Internet To: <nettime-l(a)mx.kein.org> August 26, 2016 www.feministinternet.net Preamble A feminist internet works towards empowering more women and queer persons – in all our diversities – to fully enjoy our rights, engage in pleasure and play, and dismantle patriarchy. This integrates our different realities, contexts and specificities – including age, disabilities, sexualities, gender identities and expressions, socioeconomic locations, political and religious beliefs, ethnic origins, and racial markers. The following key principles are critical towards realising a feminist internet. __Access 1 Access to the internet A feminist internet starts with enabling more women and queer persons to enjoy universal, acceptable, affordable, unconditional, open, meaningful and equal access to the internet. 2 Access to information We support and protect unrestricted access to information relevant to women and queer persons, particularly information on sexual and reproductive health and rights, pleasure, safe abortion, access to justice, and LGBTIQ issues. This includes diversity in languages, abilities, interests and contexts. 3 Usage of technology Women and queer persons have the right to code, design, adapt and critically and sustainably use ICTs and reclaim technology as a platform for creativity and expression, as well aschallenge the cultures of sexism and discrimination in all spaces. __Movements & public participation 4 Resistance The internet is a space where social norms are negotiated, performed and imposed, often in an extension of other spaces shaped by patriarchy and heteronormativity. Our struggle for a feminist internet is one that forms part of a continuum of our resistance in other spaces, public, private and in-between. 5 Movement building The internet is a transformative political space. It facilitates new forms of citizenship that enable individuals to claim, construct and express selves, genders and sexualities. This includes connecting across territories, demanding accountability and transparency, and creating opportunities for sustained feminist movement building. 6 Internet governance We believe in challenging the patriarchal spaces and processes that control internet governance, as well as putting more feminists and queers at the decision-making tables. We want to democratise policy making affecting the internet as well as diffuse ownership of and power in global and local networks. __Economy 7. Alternative economies We are committed to interrogating the capitalist logic that drives technology towards further privatisation, profit and corporate control. We work to create alternative forms of economic power that are grounded in principles of cooperation, solidarity, commons, environmental sustainability, and openness. 8. Free and open source We are committed to creating and experimenting with technology, including digital safety and security, and using free/libre and open source software (FLOSS), tools, and platforms. Promoting, disseminating, and sharing knowledge about the use of FLOSS is central to our praxis. __Expression 9 Amplifying feminist discourse We claim the power of the internet to amplify women’s narratives and lived realities. There is a need to resist the state, the religious right and other extremist forces who monopolise discourses of morality, while silencing feminist voices and persecuting women’s human rights defenders. 10 Freedom of expression We defend the right to sexual expression as a freedom of expression issue of no less importance than political or religious expression. We strongly object to the efforts of state and non-state actors to control, surveil, regulate and restrict feminist and queer expression on the Internet through technology, legislation or violence. We recognise this as part of the larger political project of moral policing, censorship, and hierarchisation of citizenship and rights. 11 Pornography and “harmful content” We recognise that the issue of pornography online has to do with agency, consent, power and labour. We reject simple causal linkages made between consumption of pornographic content and violence against women. We also reject the use of the umbrella term “harmful content”label expression on female and transgender sexuality. We support reclaiming and creating alternative erotic content that resists the mainstream patriarchal gaze and locates women and queer persons’ desires at the centre. __Agency 12 Consent We call on the need to build an ethics and politics of consent into the culture, design, policies and terms of service of internet platforms. Women’s agency lies in their ability to make informed decisions on what aspects of their public or private lives to share online. 13 Privacy and data We support the right to privacy and to full control over personal data and information online at all levels. We reject practices by states and private companies to use data for profit and to manipulate behaviour online. Surveillance is the historical tool of patriarchy, used to control and restrict women’s bodies, speech and activism. We pay equal attention to surveillance practices by individuals, the private sector, the state and non-state actors. 14 Memory We have the right to exercise and retain control over our personal history and memory on the internet. This includes being able to access all our personal data and information online, and to be able to exercise control over this data, including knowing who has access to it and under what conditions, and the ability to delete it forever. 15 Anonymity We defend the right to be anonymous and reject all claims to restrict anonymity online. Anonymity enables our freedom of expression online, particularly when it comes to breaking taboos of sexuality and heteronormativity, experimenting with gender identity, and enabling safety for women and queer persons affected by discrimination. 16 Children and youth We call for the inclusion of the voices and experiences of young people in the decisions made about safety and security online and promote their safety, privacy, and access to information. We recognise children’s right to healthy emotional and sexual development, which includes the right to privacy and access to positive information about sex, gender and sexuality at critical times in their lives. 17 Online violence We call on all internet stakeholders, including internet users, policy makers and the private sector, to address the issue of online harassment and technology-related violence. The attacks, threats, intimidation and policing experienced by women and queers are real, harmful and alarming, and are part of the broader issue of gender-based violence. It is our collective responsibility to address and end this. # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime(a)kein.org # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:

2 2

Re: Typical thread on cpunks (Was: Wodka xor Viskii)
by Cecilia Tanaka 01 Sep '16

01 Sep '16

I choose swines too. Oink oink, with pearls! :D -- "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." On Sep 1, 2016 10:29 AM, "Cecilia Tanaka" <cecilia.tanaka(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I choose > > love, love, love & kisses!!! <3 <3 <3 > > When Jake had choosen "love & orgasms", they made a lot of fake > allegations against him and he lost his work at Tor Project. :P > > -- > "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right > to say it." > On Sep 1, 2016 10:22 AM, "Georgi Guninski" <guninski(a)guninski.com> wrote: > >> Typical thread on cpunks >> >> Subject: Wodka xor Viskii? >> >> ( ">"s truncated) >> >> > .us >> >> cunt >> > .ru >> >> scumbag >> > end of convo >> >> double end convo^2 >> >>> love, love, love & kisses. 8 <- o|o >> > marxist >> >> cunt^2 >> > scumbag^3 >> >>> love & orgasms >> >> capitalist swine >> > shit >> >> shit^2 >> > end of convo^3 >> >> the convo ended >> > shit >> >> cunt^5 >> > quadratic cunt >> >> ellipsoid cunt >> > wodka!! >> >> viskii!! >> >

1 0

Re: [tor-talk] http://jacobappelbaum.net/
by Cecilia Tanaka 01 Sep '16

01 Sep '16

On Aug 31, 2016 2:53 PM, "Juan" <juan.g71(a)protonmail.com> wrote: >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] http://jacobappelbaum.net/ >> Local Time: August 30, 2016 7:26 AM >> UTC Time: August 30, 2016 2:26 PM >> From: cecilia.tanaka(a)gmail.com >> To: cypherpunks(a)cpunks.org >> >> <Talking about painful and embarrassing things, I suggest Zenaan to see old censored pics of an orgy, where Putin was part. > > > LMFAO - It has the Cecilian Seal of Approval! Pretty cute, nom nom nom! <3 https://www.flickr.com/photos/gemmacorrell/8499889901

1 2