- cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

Protonmail via Onions
by grarpamp 20 Jan '17

20 Jan '17

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13436937 In the news, but not unique, many other darknet services exist. Browser uses crypto provided by server, oops.

1 0

Grassroots technology to (unfortunately) meet the needs of victims of the technocrats
by Razer 20 Jan '17

20 Jan '17

This metal sea urchin tumbleweed-looking thingie is actually a piece of kinetic art ... and a wind-powered minesweeper. It costs $40 to make. It was created by an Afghani guy, not a thinktank or an NGO or a government. https://vimeo.com/51887079 Grassroots technology to (unfortunately) meet the needs of victims of the technocrats who claim to be technologists. They have a flashy website. Develop and market robotic and drone de-miners... AND they have a DIY page > http://minekafon.org/diy-mine-kafon/ Too cool. Too bad technocracy make all this necessary. Rr

1 0

"Operation Virtual Shield": Full-Spectrum Surveillance in Chicago
by Razer 20 Jan '17

20 Jan '17

> "Come for the food Stay because we know what you did" > > We have tons of files about the video surveillance network in Chicago, > double digit gigabytes. Most of the documents are easy to read, but as > a whole body of records involve a technical deployment that takes > place over years, and could only be easily or quickly parsed by the > files' source and mostly creator, an IBM researcher. > > Long-story short this researcher uploaded a hard drive wholesale > without password protection or even a robots.txt, and Googlebot > indexed it. > > In a previous post I mentioned using a mind map to organize a > structured directory of documents, you don't have to download the > software to use the documents I'll be posting, but please keep this in > mind, a key reason I am not just dumping a big zip file: > > You will benefit from a much fuller understanding of what you read if > you participate in the process of parsing its source corpus -- even if > you want to make a docx outline with bullet points, one for each > document perhaps, and then a child indention for components, analytic > technology, application, and then sub-levels as appropriate. > > You should also read whole documents as you go to inform your > organization but the important point is ending up with the whole body > of data in a consistent structure. This is most of the hard work on > your way to higher-level data-mining and modeling with graphing software. > > Right now I'm going to use a pretty basic approach, automating > creation of a flow-chart template from the Chicago directory as I > found it, with the exception of the last node on the second tier with > children nodes, which are the document files in the top directory, I > don't want them on the same level as the other directories for the > structure purposes just mentioned. There are a lot of folders, the > technical expertise involved in this process was the same as opening a > document from the File tab in MS Word. > > This folder (image/link) > > became this mind map. See my tweets below and my previous blog post, > I'll be updating regularly, in between doing stuff I have to do to eat... > http://blog.networkedinference.com/2017/01/also-about-video-surveillance-in…

2 5

Malicious, targeted, OS updates. How likely do you think it is?
by Anthony Papillion 19 Jan '17

19 Jan '17

A few days ago, I was thinking about ways to compromise even the most secure systems and I came across a fairly obvious way: through operating system updates. I admit that I am not up to date on the latest security research so please excuse me if this has been discussed before or is 'common knowledge'. What's stopping the FBI or other US law enforcement agency from compelling a US based operating system vendor, let's say Red Hat, from delivering a specialized update to a user that would allow the agency privileged and maybe even undetectable access to a target system? Since Red Hat has root on our systems, they could install whatever they want and most users wouldn't notice. For a company like Red Hat, it would be trivial since they know who you are as you are tied to your Red Hat subscription But this is by no means limited to them. Microsoft could do this too with a little more work. What are your thoughts? Am I crazy? Is this a 'well, we KNOW THAT already' moment that I am just catching up on? Thanks! Anthony -- Skype: cajuntechie XMPP/Jabber: papillion(a)dukgo.com PGP Key: 0xCC9D1E072AC97369 Validate My Key: https://keybase.io/cajuntechie Other Info: http://www.cajuntechie.org/p/my-pgp-key.html

5 5

Free "Anarcho-Syndicalist" State of Fiume
by John Newman 19 Jan '17

19 Jan '17

I had never heard of Fiume, formerly an Italian city, now a Croatian city called Rijeka, which apparently ran for several years after WWI with a more-or-less legit "Anarchist" (Anarcho-Syndacilist) constitution (if such a thing isn't a self-contradiction). Bruce Stering's latest novella "Pirate Utopia" turned me on to the existence of the historical "Free State of Fiume". I've just barely cracked the book open, although I am much looking forward to devouring it, but it seems to be an alternate history "diesel-punk" story focused on Fiume and the possibilites of anarchy and technology (albeit WWI-era tech). Background info on Fiume after WWI (but before Mussolini became the big swinging dick): https://theculturetrip.com/europe/italy/articles/gabriele-d-annunzio-and-th… Great interview with Bruce Sterling on the Geeks Guide podcast about "Pirate Utopia", he talks quite a bit about Fiume: https://geeksguideshow.com/2017/01/08/ggg238-bruce-sterling/ John

1 0

Schneier on Russian Hacking - deconstructed
by Steve Kinney 19 Jan '17

19 Jan '17

On 01/17/2017 04:49 PM, Bruce Schneier wrote: > > CRYPTO-GRAM > > January 15, 2017 > > The Obama administration has been more public about its evidence in the > DNC case, but it has not been entirely public. To date I have seen many assertions, but nothing resembling evidence, in support of the allegation that Russia "hacked" the DNC and released damaging (but never disclaimed) DNC documents in an effort to influence the Presidential election. > The constellation of evidence attributing the attacks against the DNC, > and subsequent release of information, is comprehensive. I believe the Bruce must have meant to say something to the effect that "The constellation of evidence attributing the attacks against the DNC, if any, has not been disclosed to the public." Or was he asserting that he has been read into the programs that developed this evidence, and shown relevant documentation? > Obama decided not to make the accusation public before the election so > as not to be seen as influencing the election. Excuse me? Obama decided to make the accusation public in a press release, a.k.a. propaganda placement dated October 7, 2016. Its content was attributed to the "USIC" by the Department of Homeland Security. This press release was distributed with clear intent to influence the election. Read it here: https://www.dhs.gov/news/2016/10/07/joint-statement-department-homeland-sec… The key allegation: "The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks .com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process." In keeping with propaganda best practices, this statement does not actually accuse Russia of anything - not if you read it closely and interpret it according to strict rules of grammar. The source of the statement is not identified: There is no such agency as the United States Intelligence Community (USIC per the press release), so it can not be attributed to any responsible authority or formal reporting process. This is the safest way to tell a Big Lie. The preceding sentence is not a statement by me that it WAS a Big Lie - so if I get dragged into Court for saying so, my hands are clean. The inflammatory pre-election press release from the Obama Administration's Department of Homeland Security was followed up by numerous placements in the U.S. press, a constellation of assertions consistent this template: A reporter says an anonymous source claimed an unnamed senior intelligence official told them that unspecified secret information confirms Russian involvement in releasing incriminating DNC e-mails to Wikileaks. The timing, context and follow-on promotion of the DHS press release blaming the leak on Russia indicate it was a component of a larger campaign by the DNC on behalf of the Clinton campaign, intended to demonize Trump by depicting his stated willingness to negotiate with Russia as proof of collaboration with a foreign enemy. Post-election, the DHS press release became the rarely-cited but always referenced cornerstone of a separate campaign asserting that the election was stolen by Russia and Trump. This was the keynote of an apparent attempt to persuade the Electors to install Hillary Clinton as President. > Now, afterward, there are > political implications in accepting that Russia hacked the DNC in an > attempt to influence the US presidential election. But no amount of > evidence can convince the unconvinceable. To the best of my knowledge - and I have been following this story closely - no evidence of "Russian Hacking" has been presented to date. We have been treated to a few code names of "hacking groups" allegedly involved, and a couple of textbook diagrams of how hostile parties penetrate network servers. That is all. If no evidence can be released due to legitimate concerns for protecting sources and methods, and no substantial national security mission is advanced by partisan accusations, it would be nice if the "USIC" would stop exposing their super-secret capabilities to the world by asserting what they knew and when they knew it. > The most important thing we can do right now is deter any country from > trying this sort of thing in the future, and the political nature of the > issue makes that harder. Right now, we've told the world that others can > get away with manipulating our election process as long as they can keep > their efforts secret until after one side wins. Obama has promised both > secret retaliations and public ones. We need to hope they're enough. Would these retaliations include, perhaps, the murder of the Russian ambassador to Turkey, the downing of a Russian plane carrying an irreplaceable cultural and diplomatic delegation to Syria, the rapid deployment of a battalion strength U.S. armor force to the Russian Federation border, and a missile attack on a Syrian airport by friendly Israelis? And if so, should we presume that all-around security expert Bruce Schneier approve of these actions? I could interpret the Obama Administration's 11th hour provocations against Russia as an effort to create a massive foreign relations crisis for the incoming Trump Administration, intended to overwhelm its underqualified foreign policy contingent and deliver early control of Trump Administration foreign policy to the U.S. intelligence establishment and other Deep State actors. Whether this might have been a "wise" course to take, is a matter of opinion. As would be the legality of such a maneuver. It may also be possible that the Obama Admninistration's pre-election propaganda placement blaming the DNC leak on the Russian Federation simply started a domino effect that ran out of control and nearly caused World War III. > This essay previously appeared on CNN.com. > http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/05/opinions/proving-source-of-dnc-hacks-difficul… CNN? I will not here repeat the propaganda slogan presently saturating U.S. media, two words that malign the veracity of certain press outlets. But the shoe fits and Mr. Schneier will have a hard time taking it back off. That makes me sad. :o/

7 7

[TriggerWarning: Neonazi baiting] Creator of a neo-Nazi website resigns b/c married to Jew
by Razer 18 Jan '17

18 Jan '17

> Mike Peinovich, the creator of a neo-Nazi website on which he jokes about the Holocaust and talks about killing Jewish people, resigned after rival neo-Nazis revealed that he was married to a Jewish woman. >From this week's Harpers Weekly Review. http://harpers.org/blog/2017/01/weeklyreview20170117/ A personal recollection A decade or so ago I was arrested after some skinhead kid at the local bus station took a swing at me for absolutely no reason (probably meth psychosis). The cops arrested both of us even though there were reliable witnesses telling them I had done, literally, nothing to start the fight (never seen the putz before in my life). While we were sitting in the back of the pigmobile waiting for the trip to jail the kid actually had the nerve to say "Please don't file charges on me! I'm on parole!" I told him he should have fucking thought about that before he decided I looked like a victim... He replied: "Awww c'mon White Blood doesn't do that to white blood!" I said: "Would it shut you the fuck up if I told you I was Jewish?" He replied, with a BIG cornball smile: "Jews are OK with me! Sholom Aleichem!" Moral of story Neonazis are ethic-less cohone-less shapeshifting weasels. Exterminate on sight. Rr Ps. I was released the next morning without apology after my story was 'officially' corroborated. And the booking papers? The charge they held me on was "Drunk in public". I rarely drink. Never in public, and I don't drink to the point of being even tipsy, no less drunk. When I mentioned that to the booking officer at the desk he just shrugged his shoulders. Another bogus crime statistic they probably ended up using to stump for the funding to build a new state-of-the-police-state-art "Alcoholic Recovery Unit", aka "Drunk Tank".

1 0

Did you know...
by Razer 18 Jan '17

18 Jan '17

Detroit has a bus route named DHCP Config. https://twitter.com/internetofshit/status/821570833063682053 RR

1 0

List Administrivia
by grarpamp 18 Jan '17

18 Jan '17

You need to be sure that you accept both 'Cc:' and 'Bcc:' to you since various other lists and conversations may include them towards you.

2 2

[OT] I Have a Dream - Martin Luther King, Jr.
by Cecilia Tanaka 18 Jan '17

18 Jan '17

ALL men and women are created equal. I don't have children yet, but I do dream they will live in a world where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, gender, sexual choice, religion, social status or anything, but by the content of their character. - c. ===== " I Have a Dream " - Martin Luther King, Jr. # https://youtu.be/H0yP4aLyq1g # http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/mlkihaveadream.htm -- "The future cannot be predicted, but futures can be invented."

6 37