- cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

The powerful cannot be condemned
by Ryan Carboni 07 May '17

07 May '17

The powerful cannot be condemned. The weak get crushed. Who gets crushed and who cannot be condemned? https://archive.is/ylBz9 Muckrock is clearly intimidated by John Young in this interview. They don't seem to be asking many follow up questions, it appears as if it is half scripted, with John Young free to troll them how they please. In fact it appears as if John Young lied... Recently Cryptome has become a non profit. Look at the Wau Holland Foundation. John Young is one of the most powerful men alive. Assange and anyone who genuinely supports him get crushed. Recently the media has condemned Trump's condemnation of the Deep State, but that hasn't occurred. What has occurred is several media personalities and a member of the opposing party confirming a conspiracy theory to appeal to the hopes of millions of overthrowing Trump. Strong responses to imaginary events because it is media that controls reality, not you or I. The ACLU protects the powerful by warping the definitions of power and weakness, thereby allowing the powerful to crush the weak. The obvious is right in front of you, if you dare look. If you dare listen. If you simply dared to defy the interests of the powerful. For the ACLU to think a certain kind of harassment is find is a pretty high bar to meet. I mean afterall, they think you should be wiretapped by the NSA, unless I have missed some repudiation of Jamal Jaffar's statements.... The ACLU is largely a criminal fraudulent organization, and the evidence is quite strong to support it. Speak out of both sides of their mouths if you will. The powerful have declared war on me, and I can, and will, single handedly destroy them all.

2 1

Fixed-state ciphers vulnerable to side channel analysis attacks
by Ryan Carboni 07 May '17

07 May '17

The simplest error correction code is a repetition code. This has escaped many peoples attention. https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/382 " The frequency at which a key should be changed in order to maintain an minimum level of protection depending on the number of unrolled rounds computed per cycle is explored." Here some attacks were made against Simon and Speck. In my lay opinion, RC4 is more secure for the internet of things. The greatest vulnerability for computers is memory bound errors, not... uh. Malicious javascript sending a DDOS on an 100 megabit uplink to a server so a passive adversary can collect ciphertexts and do statistical analysis. Naturally everyone says that no one was fired for using AES, but who was fired for not putting a password on a database? I think if the RC4 round function was applied key length bytes more times (128-bit key, 16 more key schedule rounds), the first few bytes will have less bias, and the only related key recovery attacks apply to the first few bytes. An additional xor to mask the output or input of a byte lookup may improve things. Or use an ARX cipher as a NLFSR, like the Lex cipher. In any case, don't use error correction codes in cryptography. This is some kinda multidimensional chess.

1 0

Re: [WAR] Duterte backs down "war on drugs" as "UN Special Rapporteur" Agnes Callamard surprise visits
by 'Zenaan Harkness' 07 May '17

07 May '17

Probably shoulda CCed the list. Our middle "Western" ground of "The War on Drugs" is an absolute, utter failure, if your intention is to reduce drug use and remove the incentives from the drug market. If your intention is to maximise profits, and create as many problems in society as possible so that people stay focused on shit, and don't have time nor energy to unite behind real problems, like almost completely undemocractic governments, extensive corporate violations of our humans rights, and the private banks, then The War on Drugs is the greatest invention since sliced bread. >From this narrow perspective, almost ANYthing is better than the War On Drugs - whether the extreme of Duterte, or the liberal "sanity" as some view it of treating adults as adults, rather than treating all of society as children, and allowing individual humans to do as they choose, with regards to their own bodies (more below). Of course I do not condone extra judicial killing but as I mentioned below, the illegality of something rarely stopped those in power from abusing their ability to do illegal things. I don't expect nuance from TLA shills, but I'm greatful for the nuance and insight from others on the list. Regards, Zenaan ----- Forwarded message from 'Zenaan Harkness' <zen(a)freedbms.net> ----- From: 'Zenaan Harkness' <zen(a)freedbms.net> To: Jim <jim.sovereign(a)optusnet.com.au> Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 20:32:25 +1000 Subject: Re: [WAR] Duterte backs down "war on drugs" as "UN Special Rapporteur" Agnes Callamard surprise visits On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 06:57:12PM +1000, Jim wrote: > Zen, > > Do you consider Duterte to be a good and honourable president > because I view him as an egotistical, self-righteous mass murderer > with warped moral values. He ignores his own country's constitution > and legal due process because it interferes with his murderous > crusade against drug addicts and dealers. We don't know what he has faced, nor why he has made the decisions/ followed the pathway he has chosen. It's very easy from our Western Ivory Castles ("main stream media and "democracy is king" programming), to think that others are simply wrong, immoral or even evil. Perhaps Duterte is an evil man. But I don't know whether he is or not. I won't say he is evil at this point. Although I am not a drug taker except for a cider at Christmas time, I believe that any "war on drugs" is merely a pretext for state control of what should be individual decisions - my body is mine, and it is my right to choose what I put in it. So, on principle, I think any "war on drugs" is against human rights. But I would balance that with some serious education too... Duterte? I hope he writes a book before he dies, to tell his side of his story, as I am very interested in it. If he is "evil like we imagine Adolf Hitler" was evil, then any book would be nothing but a whitewash. But we in the West very much think (and communicate) in dichotomies - black and white, good vs evil. What I do wonder is why Duterte has such stratospheric popularity in his own country. If he has handled "the drug problem", perhaps this has something to do with it. I think liberalisation/ individual personal autonomy is the preferred route to "solving the drug problem", and that's about as much as I can say, as I do not know any significant facts around Duterte except for the headlines. Fundamentally, any extra-judicial killing process is highly problematic - but that never stopped the Rothschilds or Hillary Clinton now did it? Also, glorifying extra-judicial killing would be highly problematic - we should certainly not do that. But Duterte? I think there's a lot more to the story that we get to hear. Perhaps. Hopefully one day we learn more of his story. > I hope Duterte is eventually prosecuted and imprisoned for his > appalling crimes and human rights violations. Drug dealers deserve > to be punished with long prison sentences instead of summary > executions, and how can he justify murdering drug addicts who need > help with their addiction and associated mental health issues? The Western approach, at least as we see it in Australia, is really messed up - just enough punishment to cause untold follow-on crime, mostly theft to fund addiction, with punishments which, evidently, do not stop people from becoming addicts, or from using at parties and dying from overdoses (so many teenage lives cut short), or clogging the courts, consuming incredible amounts of public resources ... the list of problems does not end. So, our "war on drugs" in Australia is absolutely, damned appalling! Frankly, I am utterly convicted of the opinion that the 'war on drugs' fuels the black market, maximises profits, disenchants the youth (late teens - we don't treat them like adults capable of making their own decisions, and neither do we treat adults like adults) and keeps the bulk of society focused on "the drug problem" without realising that most of that problem is created by the very rules of the game ... arbitrary rules which try to treat adults like children, and thus create a society of many fucked up humans. WE are doing something wrong, here in Australia. By keeping us all focused on problems which are totally artificial, which don't have the energy or collective resources to unify behind REAL problems, like road tolls, our right to travel, and the banks. Get rid of the war on drugs, make all drugs purchasable through prescription for almost cost price from pharmacies, and addicts then have absolutely no need to go theiving, cars or houses or corner stores. But the problem is wanted, so The War On Drugs is maintained. > I wonder if Duterte would have any member of his family killed if > they were drug addicts or drug dealers? I doubt it. We don't know Jim, we don't know. We don't know Duterte, and we don't know the facts of his life - only the headlines. Regards, Zen > -----Original Message----- > From: Zenaan Harkness [mailto:zen@freedbms.net] > Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2017 12:34 PM > To: CypherPunks > Subject: [WAR] Duterte backs down "war on drugs" as "UN Special Rapporteur" Agnes Callamard surprise visits > > Well, actually, we're getting to know Duterte, and we know he doesn't back down against something he believes in. In fact, he's the kind of guy who, when ambushed by a fancy French word like "rapporteur", doubles down instead. > > And despite what we might believe about his policies, he enjoys stratospheric popularity numbers the likes of which even Putin could be envious of if Putin were the envious type, which of course he's not :) > > Now try saying this fancy French word "rapporteur" in a truly French accent and tell me you don't want to smack yourself in the face for sounding so pompous . . that word alone inspires me to high-five Duterte for his doubling down. > > > > > ** Duterte to drug dealers: ‘I will kill you. I will really kill you’ > http://theduran.com/duterte-to-drug-dealers-i-will-kill-you-i-will-really-k… > ------------------------------------------------------------ > duterte fist > > The remarks came as a UN envoy known for her opposition to Duterte's policies paid a surprise visit to the country. > ----- End forwarded message -----

4 3

Paul Carr leaves PandoDaily a note on the dresser and no cab fare...
by Razer 06 May '17

06 May '17

"For years, I've “called out” Silicon Valley's “bad apples”, but by the start of 2017 it was impossible to distinguish maggot from apple from the rotting barrel itself. My workdays were an endless perp walk of sociopaths, psychopaths and criminals with names like (Pando investor) Peter Thiel, Travis Kalanick, Emil Michael, Palmer Luckey, and Gurbaksh Chahal – not to mention their enablers and co-conspirators like Paul Graham and Sam Altman, Rachel Whetstone and Steve Hilton, Joe Lonsdale, Arianna Huffington, Shervin Pishevar, and a thousand more like them. Never mind that actually writing about these clammy-palmed monsters frequently made me want to punch a wall. Sometimes merely glancing at tech headlines was enough to make me feel physically unwell. (As I was writing that last sentence, Sarah called over to me: “Hey, did you hear about this Memphis tech exec accused of multiple rapes?” I had not.) Please understand I'm not being hyperbolic when I say “physically unwell.” Around the time America's tech royalty made its pilgrimage to Trump Tower, I suddenly stopped sleeping through the night..." In full with lottsa links: https://pando.com/2017/04/28/quitting-swamp/

1 1

99% of PGP-encrypted security reports to security@golang.org are bogus
by Zenaan Harkness 06 May '17

06 May '17

Some sanity comedy for the bored: "99% of the PGP-encrypted emails we get to security(a)golang.org are bogus security reports. Whereas "cleartext" security reports are only about 5-10% bogus. Getting a PGP-encrypted email to security(a)golang.org has basically become a reliable signal that the report is going to be bogus, so I stopped caring about spending the 5 minutes decrypting the damn thing (logging in to the key server to get the key, remembering how to use gpg)." — Brad Fitzpatrick Quote: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14123388 courtesy this week's LWN briefs https://lwn.net/Articles/721184/

1 0

[WAR] Duterte backs down "war on drugs" as "UN Special Rapporteur" Agnes Callamard surprise visits
by Zenaan Harkness 06 May '17

06 May '17

Well, actually, we're getting to know Duterte, and we know he doesn't back down against something he believes in. In fact, he's the kind of guy who, when ambushed by a fancy French word like "rapporteur", doubles down instead. And despite what we might believe about his policies, he enjoys stratospheric popularity numbers the likes of which even Putin could be envious of if Putin were the envious type, which of course he's not :) Now try saying this fancy French word "rapporteur" in a truly French accent and tell me you don't want to smack yourself in the face for sounding so pompous . . that word alone inspires me to high-five Duterte for his doubling down. ** Duterte to drug dealers: ‘I will kill you. I will really kill you’ http://theduran.com/duterte-to-drug-dealers-i-will-kill-you-i-will-really-k… ------------------------------------------------------------ duterte fist The remarks came as a UN envoy known for her opposition to Duterte's policies paid a surprise visit to the country.

2 1

[jim.sovereign@optusnet.com.au: It's an insult to Mans intelligence to believe Fake Jewish Media & Politicians.]
by Zenaan Harkness 06 May '17

06 May '17

Well, the facts continue to be exposed. This is just another fact re the holohoax which up until just now, I was unaware of. The truth shall set us free. Well, may be not but at least the truth lifts particular veils of deception foisted upon the bulk of humanity here and there. I do prefer to be made aware of the truth of the deceptions and to know how illusioned I was - disillusionment is a more comfortable, if resigned, state of being.. Regards, Zenaan From: Aussie Justice [mailto:aussiejustice@optusnet.com.au] Sent: Friday, May 05, 2017 5:51 PM To: Peta.Credlin(a)skynews.com.au; clarence(a)parliament.nsw.gov.au; dubbo(a)parliament.nsw.gov.au; aca(a)nine.com.au; 60minutes(a)nine.com.au; letters(a)dailytelegraph.com.au; newsroom(a)dailyexaminer.com.au; legcom senate; efpa.reps(a)aph.gov.au; human right; info(a)rlc.org.au; News CV review; senator.ryan(a)aph.gov.au; valerie hendrie; Andrew.Stoner(a)parliament.nsw.gov.au; shine solicitors; leichhardt council; ElectorateOffice.Balmain(a)parliament.nsw.gov.au; nan bosler; fraserk(a)qnp.newsltd.com.au; Mindy Sotiri; Ben McClellan; Elders Real Estate Grafton; supreme_court(a)courts.nsw.gov.au; Kangaroo Court of Australia; vaucluse(a)parliament.nsw.gov.au; pastorkemble(a)yahoo.com; ffultiak(a)websurf.net.au Subject: Fw: It’s an insult to Mans intelligence to believe Fake Jewish Media & Politicians. >From 1915 till 1938 every couple of months, in many different American Newspapers, six millions Jews were exterminate, humiliated, starved, hounded, persecuted, slathered, tortured, and finally in 1936 the word European Holocaust appear. WWII started 1 September 1939. About politicians follow; curious case of Lamberto Fedeli. Or my emails. From: governor(a)cqfreestate.com Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 11:03 AM Cc: CHURCH MILITANTS ; CRYPTO CREW ; AUSSIE PATRIOTS Subject: FW: Its an insult to Mans intelligence to believe Fake Jewish Media & Politicians. FYI From: Frank <ffultiak(a)websurf.net.au> Date: Tuesday, 2 May 2017 at 10:47 am To: Frank <ffultiak(a)websurf.net.au> Subject: Its an insult to Mans intelligence to believe Fake Jewish Media & Politicians. It’s an insult to Mans intelligence to believe Fake Jewish Media & Politicians. mage result for jews lie

1 0

[OT] Special Dates (was Re: What is the value of the State?)
by Cecilia Tanaka 05 May '17

05 May '17

[OT] On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 7:41 PM, Cecilia Tanaka <cecilia.tanaka(a)gmail.com> wrote: > PS for Georgi, who likes to celebrate special dates! > > May the 4th be with you, yayyy!!! :D ----------- And today, Happy Cinco de Mayo, yayyy!!! :D * Trump Before (2016): https://www.facebook.com/DonaldTrump/posts/10157008375200725:0 * Trump Today (2017): http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/cinco-de-mayo-met-ambivalence-age-trump-… ---------- * 17 Delicious Tequila Drinks You’ll Want To Make For Cinco De Mayo https://www.buzzfeed.com/laurenpacek/17-boozy-tequila-drinks-to-sip-on-cinc… I don't drink alcohol, but these drinks are so 'wow', so gorgeous... Beautiful colors, lovely aesthetic! (* o *) We don't celebrate the Cinco de Mayo, but I love tacos and Mexican Culture! <3

1 0

FBI Director James Comey spouts nonsense yet again.
by jim bell 05 May '17

05 May '17

http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/03/politics/comey-wikileaks-journalists-intellig… (CNN)FBI Director James Comey sent a clear message to newsrooms across the country Wednesday: American journalists who receive classified material from sources are not criminals.Comey was specifically asked during a Senate judiciary committee hearing by Republican Sen. Ben Sasse to explain whether journalists violate the law by soliciting leaks within the intelligence community."That conduct is not treated by the US government as criminal conduct," Comey explained. "In my lifetime, the Department of Justice's view has been newsgathering and legitimate news coverage is not covered and is not going to be investigated or prosecuted as a criminal act." "Our focus is and should be on the leakers and not those that are obtaining (classified information) as part of legitimate newsgathering," Comey added.While legal protections exist for reporters publishing classified information -- Comey's exchange with Sasse, a Nebraska Republican, was particularly noteworthy given President Donald Trump's repeated calls for leak investigations.Sasse also raised the potential prosecution of WikiLeaks' founder Julian Assange and prompted Comey to "wax broadly" on the thornier issue of when "an allegedly journalistic organization crosses a line to become some sort of a tool of foreign intelligence."While Comey chose his words carefully to avoid prejudicing "any future proceeding," the FBI director sought to draw a clear distinction between journalists engaged in legitimate newsgathering and how he views WikiLeaks' efforts."To my mind it crosses a line when it moves from being about trying to educate a public and instead just becomes about intelligence porn frankly -- just pushing out information about sources and methods without regard to interest, without regard to the First Amendment values that normally underlie press reporting, and simply becomes a conduit for the Russian intelligence services or some other adversary of the United States just to push out information to damage the United States," Comey explained. "(S)urely there's conduct that's so far to the side of that line that we can all agree there's nothing that even smells 'journalist' about some of this conduct."But Sasse nudged Comey to further flesh out the difference between the mainstream press and WikiLeaks."In my view, a huge portion of WikiLeaks' activities has nothing to do with legitimate newsgathering, informing the public and commenting on important public controversies, but is simply about releasing classified information to damage the US," Comey said."People sometimes get cynical about journalists -- American journalists do not do that. They will almost always call us before they publish classified information and say, 'is there anything about this that is going to put lives in danger -- that is going to jeopardize government people, military people, or innocent civilians anywhere in the world?'" Comey added. "This activity I'm talking about with WikiLeaks involves no such considerations whatsoever." [end of long quote]

2 2

[MONEY] [WAR] Is Your Bank Owned By The Rothschilds?
by Zenaan Harkness 04 May '17

04 May '17

Most here know all this. Perhaps this particular exposition might be useful to send to someone... Z ----- Forwarded message from Gil May <gilmay97(a)gmail.com> ----- Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 09:23:11 +1000 Subject: Is Your Bank Owned By The Rothschilds? *Capitalism, Corporatism & Banking Cartel* <http://www.alternativenewsnetwork.net/category/truth-feed/capitalism-corpor…> *Conspiracy Archive* <http://www.alternativenewsnetwork.net/category/truth-feed/conspiracy-archiv…> *New World Order Exposition* <http://www.alternativenewsnetwork.net/category/truth-feed/new-world-order-e…> *Truth Feed* <http://www.alternativenewsnetwork.net/category/truth-feed/> *Is Your Bank Owned By The Rothschilds? Here Is The Complete List * *October 2, 2016* <http://www.alternativenewsnetwork.net/bank-owned-rothschilds/> *SatyaRaj* <http://www.alternativenewsnetwork.net/author/satyadev/> *1 Comment* <http://www.alternativenewsnetwork.net/bank-owned-rothschilds/> Post Views: 245,875 *(Humans Are Free)* <http://humansarefree.com/2013/11/complete-list-of-banks-ownedcontrolled.html> *Banks Owned By The Rothschilds:-* What’s the significance of having a central bank within a country and why should you concern yourself, your family and colleagues? Central banks are illegally created PRIVATE banks that are owned by the Rothschild banking family. The family has been around for more than 230 years and has slithered its way into each country on this planet, threatened every world leader and their governments and cabinets with physical and economic death and destruction, and then emplaced their own people in these central banks to control and manage each country’s pocketbook. Worse, the Rothschilds also control the machinations of each government at the macro level, not concerning themselves with the daily vicissitudes of our individual personal lives. Except when we get too far out of line. The grand plan of *The First Sphere of Influence* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sphere_of_influence> is to create a global mononation. Please do not confuse this with the term globalization. Mononation and globalization couldn’t be more different in concept, scope and purpose. Mononation is one state. It has one government. One set of laws for all ordinary citizens, no laws for the elite. Globalization refers to communicating, trading, interacting, etc. among separate, different, independent, sovereign countries. The grand plan of The First Sphere of Influence is to create a global mononation. Our own Federal Reserve is an illegally emplaced private bank that is directly responsible for creating all the US’s depressions, recessions, and the inflation and deflation of our dollar. The Fed controls the printing of our own currency, and then charges the US government interest on those loans. The interest is growing each year, making it difficult if not impossible for our government to pay it. How do we pay this interest? By the US Personal Income Tax. This tax goes to the Rothschild family. In the coming months, as I continue to gather intel and write a book about The First Sphere of Influence, I will share more and more. For now, I kindly ask that you read each of the 165 lines below. One hundred and sixty-five reasons to believe my intel. You can click on each bank and visit its website. I’ve seen each one. They’re real. And they’re one of the reasons why each country is in such deep debt to this insidious family, the Rothschilds. By the way, if you’re curious what the US debt is to the BIS, please refer to the table at the end of this article, taken from the latest statistical results provided by the Joint External Debt Hub, which receives data from the BIS, International Monetary Fund, World Bank, and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. *Want to know what banks they actually own? Here is the complete list:* Afghanistan: Bank of Afghanistan Albania: Bank of Albania Algeria: Bank of Algeria Argentina: Central Bank of Argentina Armenia: Central Bank of Armenia Aruba: Central Bank of Aruba *Australia: Reserve Bank of Australia* Austria: Austrian National Bank Azerbaijan: Central Bank of Azerbaijan Republic Bahamas: Central Bank of The Bahamas Bahrain: Central Bank of Bahrain Bangladesh: Bangladesh Bank Barbados: Central Bank of Barbados Belarus: National Bank of the Republic of Belarus Belgium: National Bank of Belgium Belize: Central Bank of Belize Benin: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Bermuda: Bermuda Monetary Authority Bhutan: Royal Monetary Authority of Bhutan Bolivia: Central Bank of Bolivia Bosnia: Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana: Bank of Botswana Brazil: Central Bank of Brazil Bulgaria: Bulgarian National Bank Burkina Faso: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Burundi: Bank of the Republic of Burundi Cambodia: National Bank of Cambodia Cameroon: Bank of Central African States Canada: Bank of Canada – Banque du Canada Cayman Islands: Cayman Islands Monetary Authority Central African Republic: Bank of Central African States Chad: Bank of Central African States Chile: Central Bank of Chile China: The People’s Bank of China Colombia: Bank of the Republic Comoros: Central Bank of Comoros Congo: Bank of Central African States Costa Rica: Central Bank of Costa Rica Côte d’Ivoire: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Croatia: Croatian National Bank Cuba: Central Bank of Cuba Cyprus: Central Bank of Cyprus Czech Republic: Czech National Bank Denmark: National Bank of Denmark Dominican Republic: Central Bank of the Dominican Republic East Caribbean area: Eastern Caribbean Central Bank Ecuador: Central Bank of Ecuador Egypt: Central Bank of Egypt El Salvador: Central Reserve Bank of El Salvador Equatorial Guinea: Bank of Central African States Estonia: Bank of Estonia Ethiopia: National Bank of Ethiopia European Union: European Central Bank Fiji: Reserve Bank of Fiji Finland: Bank of Finland France: Bank of France Gabon: Bank of Central African States The Gambia: Central Bank of The Gambia Georgia: National Bank of Georgia Germany: Deutsche Bundesbank Ghana: Bank of Ghana Greece: Bank of Greece Guatemala: Bank of Guatemala Guinea Bissau: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Guyana: Bank of Guyana Haiti: Central Bank of Haiti Honduras: Central Bank of Honduras Hong Kong: Hong Kong Monetary Authority Hungary: Magyar Nemzeti Bank Iceland: Central Bank of Iceland India: Reserve Bank of India Indonesia: Bank Indonesia Iran: The Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran Iraq: Central Bank of Iraq Ireland: Central Bank and Financial Services Authority of Ireland Israel: Bank of Israel Italy: Bank of Italy Jamaica: Bank of Jamaica Japan: Bank of Japan Jordan: Central Bank of Jordan Kazakhstan: National Bank of Kazakhstan Kenya: Central Bank of Kenya Korea: Bank of Korea Kuwait: Central Bank of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan: National Bank of the Kyrgyz Republic Latvia: Bank of Latvia Lebanon: Central Bank of Lebanon Lesotho: Central Bank of Lesotho Libya: Central Bank of Libya (Their most recent conquest) Uruguay: Central Bank of Uruguay Lithuania: Bank of Lithuania Luxembourg: Central Bank of Luxembourg Macao: Monetary Authority of Macao Macedonia: National Bank of the Republic of Macedonia Madagascar: Central Bank of Madagascar Malawi: Reserve Bank of Malawi Malaysia: Central Bank of Malaysia Mali: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Malta: Central Bank of Malta Mauritius: Bank of Mauritius Mexico: Bank of Mexico Moldova: National Bank of Moldova Mongolia: Bank of Mongolia Montenegro: Central Bank of Montenegro Morocco: Bank of Morocco Mozambique: Bank of Mozambique Namibia: Bank of Namibia Nepal: Central Bank of Nepal Netherlands: Netherlands Bank Netherlands Antilles: Bank of the Netherlands Antilles New Zealand: Reserve Bank of New Zealand Nicaragua: Central Bank of Nicaragua Niger: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Nigeria: Central Bank of Nigeria Norway: Central Bank of Norway Oman: Central Bank of Oman Pakistan: State Bank of Pakistan Papua New Guinea: Bank of Papua New Guinea Paraguay: Central Bank of Paraguay Peru: Central Reserve Bank of Peru Philippines: Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas Poland: National Bank of Poland Portugal: Bank of Portugal Qatar: Qatar Central Bank Romania: National Bank of Romania Russia: Central Bank of Russia Rwanda: National Bank of Rwanda San Marino: Central Bank of the Republic of San Marino Samoa: Central Bank of Samoa Saudi Arabia: Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency Senegal: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Serbia: National Bank of Serbia Seychelles: Central Bank of Seychelles Sierra Leone: Bank of Sierra Leone Singapore: Monetary Authority of Singapore Slovakia: National Bank of Slovakia Slovenia: Bank of Slovenia Solomon Islands: Central Bank of Solomon Islands South Africa: South African Reserve Bank Spain: Bank of Spain Sri Lanka: Central Bank of Sri Lanka Sudan: Bank of Sudan Surinam: Central Bank of Suriname Swaziland: The Central Bank of Swaziland Sweden: Sveriges Riksbank Switzerland: Swiss National Bank Tajikistan: National Bank of Tajikistan Tanzania: Bank of Tanzania Thailand: Bank of Thailand Togo: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Tonga: National Reserve Bank of Tonga Trinidad and Tobago: Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia: Central Bank of Tunisia Turkey: Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey Uganda: Bank of Uganda Ukraine: National Bank of Ukraine United Arab Emirates: Central Bank of United Arab Emirates United Kingdom: Bank of England United States: Federal Reserve, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Vanuatu: Reserve Bank of Vanuatu Venezuela: Central Bank of Venezuela Vietnam: The State Bank of Vietnam Yemen: Central Bank of Yemen Zambia: Bank of Zambia Zimbabwe: Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe According to *humanfree* <http://humansarefree.com/2013/11/complete-list-of-banks-ownedcontrolled.htm…>: Virtually unknown to the general public is the fact that the US Federal Reserve is a privately owned company, siting on its very own patch of land, immune to the US laws. This privately owned company (controlled by the Rothschilds, Rockefellers and Morgans) prints the money FOR the US Government, which pays them interest for the “favor.” This means that if we would reset the nation’s debt today and would begin reprinting money, we would be in debt to the FED from the very first dollar loaned to our Government. Also, most people living in the USA have no clue that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is a foreign agency. To be more accurate, the IRS is a foreign private corporation of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and is the private “army” of the Federal Reserve (Fed). Its main goal is to make sure the American people pay their tax and be good little slaves. *In 1835, US President Andrew Jackson declared his disdain for the international bankers:* “You are a den of vipers. I intend to rout you out, and by the Eternal God I will rout you out. If the people only understood the rank injustice of our money and banking system, there would be a revolution before morning.” There followed an (unsuccessful) assassination attempt on President Jackson’s life. Jackson had told his vice president, Martin Van Buren: “The bank, Mr. Van Buren, is trying to kill me.” This was the beginning of a pattern of intrigue that would plague the White House itself over the coming decades. Both Lincoln and JFK have been murdered for trying to rid the country of banksters. *The world’s Megabanks* There are two Megabanks that offer loans to all the countries around the planet, the World Bank and the IMF. The first one is jointly owned by the world’s top banking families, with the Rothschilds at the very top, while the second one is privately owned by the Rothschilds alone. These two Megabanks offer loans to “developing countries” and use their almost impossible-to-pay-back interests to get their hands on the real wealth: land and precious metals. But that’s not all! An important part of their plan is to also exploit a country’s natural resources (like petrol or gas) via their covertly-owned companies, refine them, and sell them back to the same country, making a huge profit. But in order for these companies to operate optimally, they need a solid infrastructure, which is usually lacking in the so called “developing countries.” So before the banksters even offer the almost impossible-to-pay-back loans, they make sure that most of the money will be invested in — you’ve guessed it — infrastructure. These “negotiations” are carried out by the so called “Economic Hitmen”, who succeed by handsomely rewarding (i.e. bribing) or threatening with death those who are in the position to sell away their country. For more information on the subject, I suggest reading the Confessions of an Economic Hitman. The one bank that rules them all, the “Bank for International Settlement,” is — obviously — controlled by the Rothschilds and it is nicknamed the “Tower of Basel.” The true power of the Rothschilds goes FAR beyond the Banking Empire If you are not yet amazed by the power of the Rothschilds (I know you are), please know that they are also behind all wars since Napoleon. That’s when they’ve discovered just how profitable it is to finance both sides of a war and they’ve been doing it ever since. In 1849, Guttle Schnapper, the wife of Mayer Amschel stated: “If my sons did not want wars, there would be none.” So, the world is still at war because it is very, very profitable to the Rothschilds and their parasite bankster bloodlines. And for as long as we will continue to use money, the world will never know peace. It is shocking for many to find out that the United States of America is a corporation ruled from abroad. Its original name was the Virginia Company and it was owned by the British Crown (it should not be mistaken for the Queen, which functions largely in a ceremonial capacity only). The British Crown donated the company to the Vatican, which gave the exploitation rights back to the Crown. The US Presidents are appointed CEOs and their business is to make money for the British Crown and the Vatican, who take their share of the profits every year. The British Crown covertly rules the world from the 677-acre, independent sovereign state, know as The City of London. This other Crown is comprised of a committee of 12 banks headed by the Bank of England. Guess who is controlling the Bank of England? Yes, the Rothschilds! In 1815, Nathan Mayer made the following statement: “I care not what puppet is placed upon the throne of England to rule the Empire on which the sun never sets. The man who controls Britain’s money supply controls the British Empire, and I control the British money supply.” The House of Rothschild is really at the top of the pyramid of power. They are behind the New World Order and the complete domination of the world agenda. They are behind the European Union and the Euro and they are behind the idea of a North American Union and the Amero. They are controlling all of the world’s secret services and their private army is NATO. ----- End forwarded message -----

1 0