- cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

A 1986 interview of Miles Copeland explains why spooks can lie to Congress
by Ryan Carboni 27 Jul '17

27 Jul '17

http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/features/secret-agent-man-19860116 Okay, I'll give you an answer: The CIA is set up so that it's impossible for a person as an individual to arrogate to himself the right to lie to a congressional committee or to anyone else. But what he can or cannot say is clearly specified from the day he is sworn in. He can lie to people who are not his bosses, who do not have security clearances. Most congressmen do not have security clearances. When Senator Frank Church asked me something, and he said, "Will you take an oath," I said, "Senator, I'll take the oath, and I wouldn't think of telling you the truth." Personally, I like Colby very much. He's a very fine man, but he's just the wrong kind of guy to be head of the CIA. He's a good guy. For unknown reasons, this has been totally forgotten. Fortunately we rely on Snowden to remember for us, and he says he revealed the truth for the first time ever. The news media backs him up on this. And Applebaum kept his high salary mainly because he was good with the media (or the media was good with him?). But hey, I wrote something about the Pike Committee vacuuming up information. Waiting for Best to come out with some bland matter of fact article about historical government lies to the public, that'd make your brain lame. The interesting thing about Miles Copeland is that he does provide the unvarnished horrible truth of how some things work, as far as I can tell based on what little information is publicly available. If you read Miles Copeland's interview, you can understand how Snowden the movie can be a recruitment video for some, and a video to accept the current regime for most. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog-whistle_politics (oddly Oliver Stone's trilogy on Presidents were good and honest) There is no good answers to anything, it's all horrible, no one is doing anything. I point things out, nothing is really done, I point things out in greater specificity months later, some indications of something being done begins to be shown.... It's not an OODA loop if your brain is off. It's just A. Maybe no one asks me anything because they are afraid of the answers, not from what influence I would have (which is a non-problem since we got here by consensus, what could one person even do with diffuse authority?). Unless there is a critical point of information by which I could begin pointing out what is going on?

1 0

Whom you may not criticize? - USA avidly chasing Germany's Zio-laws
by Lettuce 27 Jul '17

27 Jul '17

> Zenaan Harkness zen at freedbms.net > Mon Jul 24 07:59:18 PDT 2017 > > H.R. 1697 > S. 720 > Hate speeeech is protected in the US you retarded nigger faggot :^)

1 0

[Social Engineering] Russian Prankster Convinces DOE Chief Rick Perry He Was Speaking to Ukraine PM
by Razer 26 Jul '17

26 Jul '17

> WASHINGTON — U.S. Energy Secretary Rick Perry optimistically > discussed expanding American coal exports to Ukraine and other energy > matters during a lengthy phone call this month with a Russian > prankster who Perry thought was Ukraine's prime minister. > > Perry actually was talking with comedians known in Russia for > targeting celebrities and politicians with audacious stunts, Energy > Department spokeswoman Shaylyn Hynes said in a written statement. > > Pranksters Vladimir Krasnov and Alexei Stolyarov are sometimes called > the "Jerky Boys of Russia," after an American duo who put out > recordings of their prank phone calls in the 1990s. They have made > faux calls to British singer Elton John > <http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/russias-putin-calls-elton-john-real-time-…>, > who thought he was speaking to Russian President Vladimir Putin, and > others. > > "These individuals are known for pranking high-level officials and > celebrities, particularly those who are supportive of an agenda that > is not in line with their governments. In this case, the energy > security of Ukraine," Hynes said. > > During the 22-minute call on July 19, Perry, whose department oversees > the U.S. nuclear weapons program, discussed a range of topics in a > business-like tone, including sanctions against Russia and helping > Ukraine develop oil and gas. > > Perry said the Trump administration opposes Nord Stream 2, a Russian > project to bring natural gas to Europe across the Baltic and that U.S. > technology could help Ukraine develop gas. > > "Giving Ukraine more options with some of our technology is, I think, > in everyone's best interest with the exception of the Russians, but > that's OK," he said. > > Perry also discussed the Paris climate accord and coal exports on the > call. > > The call, first reported by E&E news, was recorded and posted online. > > It happened about a month after Perry met with Ukrainian President > Petro Poroshenko and his delegation at the Energy Department. > > President Donald Trump said last month that Washington plans to offer > Ukraine more coal exports from the United States because the eastern > European nation's industrial sector has difficulty securing coal from > separatist-held regions. > > It is unclear how the United States would bring more coal to Ukraine > but Perry hinted on the call that the Commerce Department was working > on it. > > "The coal conversation at this particular point in time is with > (Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross) and I full well suspect it will go > forward," he said on the call. > > News of the call came the same day the U.S. House of Representatives > voted overwhelmingly to impose new sanctions on Russia. [Reuters] > http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/russian-prankster-convinced-rick-perry-…

2 2

An examination of the Tor fork hullabaloo
by Ryan Carboni 26 Jul '17

26 Jul '17

Andrea Shepard mentions that the Tor fork stinks of Russia psyops ( https://twitter.com/puellavulnerata/status/769311082318036992 ). It obviously failed. How would the next time succeed? This Tor fork operation likely failed because it did not take into account obvious measures of status, if Joshua Yabut had joined Tor and made contributions and gained social capital before the crisis, he would be more likely to succeed and draw a following by splitting off at the moment of crisis. He did things in the wrong order. Interestingly, he was NASA Red Team, or cyber counter intelligence, much like the creator of Encyclopedia Dramatica, but I digress. But Joshua Yabut has an obvious connection to the US Army, former infantry. There have been many suspicious events involving the US Army's history. McCarthy's investigation of Communist subversion failed when he went after the army (more obscure voices will point to another investigation into another agency). Lee Harvey Oswald was in the navy before defecting to Russia, there were allegations that he provided information that allowed the U-2 to be shot down. More recently, CIA militias in Syria are fighting Pentagon militias in Syria ( http://www.latimes.com/world/middleeast/la-fg-cia-pentagon-isis-20160327-st… ). There are also allegations that the Pentagon sabotaged the State Department's peace deal with Russia. This has been characterized many ways, Cowboy vs Yankee War, Moldbug's Red Empire vs Blue Empire. There is certainly some sort of internal antagonism being played out in the world. Regardless, nothing is quite what it seems, and searching for the truth is unrewarding. Better to find it at the bottom of a bottle. P.S. I wonder how many times Zerodium pays for the same exploit from different researchers. Afterall, if they stiff a researcher, they can always alert the maintainers of the code, if they aren't one themselves. P.P.S. How much does it cost to have a botnet untraceably DDOS Tor?

2 1

Security theatre: Travel in Hungary, EU
by Georgi Guninski 25 Jul '17

25 Jul '17

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/07/25/hungarian_teenager_arrest_sparks_pr… Kid found a way to travel for free in Budapest. He filed a bug report. And was promptly arrested The tale started last week when an unnamed 18-year-old found that he was able to, when purchasing a ticket online, poke the BKK website in a particular way to modify the ticket's price and buy it at that new price. The BKK then held a press conference at which its CEO Kálmán Dab◈czi proudly announced they had caught a hacker and had filed an official complaint against him. For his part, the T-Systems' CEO Zoltán Kaszás has also been forced to apologize, especially after it was revealed the company is paid $1m a year to maintain the system and its security.

2 1

political dissidents "thin edge of the wedge" example - was Re: Whom you may not criticize? - USA avidly chasing Germany's Zio-laws
by Zenaan Harkness 25 Jul '17

25 Jul '17

This "backward European" nation provides a fine sample of what's coming down the pipeline folks, both EU and US - "we" collectively fail to handle oppression by the state, and so "our" states end up handling us, over and over again (second para gives the guts of this story): http://theduran.com/russian-civil-society-needs-save-polands-soviet-era-mon… The Polish authorities recently signed into law a hyper-nationalist motion which will lead to the removal of hundreds of Soviet-era monuments in the country, with some being placed in obscure “museums” and others being destroyed. Approximately 600,000 Red Army soldiers sacrificed their lives to save Poland from Nazi occupation and genocide, as well as to liberate the many death camps that the fascists constructed on the country’s territory. It’s a terrible affront to these martyrs and their Polish allies that Warsaw is undertaking such a radical approach to historical revisionism, but all moral objections aside, there seems to be little that can be done to reverse this decision and ensure that the monuments remain standing in their original locations for generations to come. Polish dissident Mateusz Piskorski was organizing a grassroots campaign to save these statues in the run-up to the looming passing of this controversial legislation, but he’s since been imprisoned for over a year already on politically trumped up allegations of supposedly being Russian and/or Chinese “spy”. Leaving aside the ridiculousness of the accusations being levelled against him, his arrest deprived Polish civil society of a strong voice to lobby on behalf of historical justice, and it probably also intimidated many of his supporters from carrying on the cause. ... "European values" indeed. Good luck fellow humans, On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:59:18AM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > Well, well, well ... an amazing yet serious GTFOOH moment: >⋅ >⋅ > So. As we know, in just over a dozen countries 'tis a criminal > offense to verbally challenge the ziocaust narrative, Germany being > target #1. >⋅ > Of course in the land of the free, home of the brave North America, > the First Amendment guarantees the freedom of speech. >⋅ > Except when (((they))) introduce (arguably, possibly, debatably) > illegal statute laws such as H.R. 1697. >⋅ > Goyem, the brazenness on display by (((your rulers))) is something to > behold - kiss your first amendment goodbye: >⋅ >⋅ > US CONGRESS: Israel first First Amendment second > http://theduran.com/us-congress-israel-first-first-amendment-second/ > Senators and Representatives in the US Congress are attempting to > pass legislation which would criminalise the boycotting of Israel and > also criminalise the advocacy of such boycotts. The legislation is > clearly unconstitutional, yet this hasn't stopped many in Congress > from advocating for new restrictive laws. >⋅ > In March of 2017, bills were introduced in the US Senate ( > https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/720/text?format=xml > ) and House of Representatives ( > https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/720/text?format=xml > ) which would criminalise support of the Boycott, Divestment and > Sanctions (BDS) movement as well as other organisations which > advocate for a boycott of Israel and Israeli products. >⋅ > Journalist Rob Wolfe summarised ( > http://www.vnews.com/Israel-Boycott-Bill-In-Congress-11374160 > ) the effects of the proposed legislation as follows, >⋅ > “The bill, which goes by H.R. 1697 and S. 720, would prohibit > · American businesses or individuals engaged in interstate or > · foreign commerce from ‘supporting any boycott fostered or imposed > · by an international organization, or requesting imposition of any > · such boycott, against Israel,’according to a congressional > · summary”. > ... >⋅ >⋅ >⋅ >⋅ >⋅ > In case the obvious thin edge of the wedge got missed, the trial run > for "criminalization of a boycott by a business" was that well > publicized case against the Christian bakery couple who chose to > boycott serving a Homosexual couple asking for a "gay wedding cake". >⋅ > Litmus test folks, litmus test it was. >⋅ > So now America gets to have its Zio cake and eat it too. >⋅ > Only real question - are there any USAians not so cowardly they > would readily suffer jail for such "crimethink"? Doubtful... >⋅ >⋅ > She'll be comin' down the gas pipe when she comes; yee haw! > She'll be firing the gas oven when she comes; yee haw! > She'll be burning first amendments, jailing all free thinkers, > She'll be FEMA martial law camps where you're done! >⋅ >⋅ > It'll be sad from one perspective, cleansing from another - Razer, > you wanted something to --really-- go to war over? It's gettin close > bro, getting closer by the month!

1 0

The Guccifer 2.0 "Email hack implicating **The Russians**" wasn't a Hack
by Razer 25 Jul '17

25 Jul '17

> > "Independent cyber-investigators have now completed the kind of > forensic work that the (US govt) intelligence assessment did not do. > Oddly, the “hand-picked” intelligence analysts contented themselves > with “assessing” this and “assessing” that. In contrast, the > investigators dug deep and came up with verifiable evidence from > metadata found in the record of the alleged Russian hack. > > They found that the purported “hack” of the DNC by Guccifer 2.0 was > not a hack, by Russia or anyone else. Rather it originated with a copy > (onto an external storage device – a thumb drive, for example) by an > insider. The data was leaked after being doctored with a cut-and-paste > job to implicate Russia. We do not know who or what the murky Guccifer > 2.0 is. You may wish to ask the FBI." > > ~ Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) > > In full @Zerohedge http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-07-24/nsa-officials-and-computer-expert-…

1 0

US Government Propaganda Outlet Funds Electronic Frontier Foundation
by Polity News 25 Jul '17

25 Jul '17

Title: US Government Propaganda Outlet Funds Electronic Frontier Foundation Author: Rachael Tackett Date of Publication: July 24, 2017 Website Link: https://diycivics.wordpress.com/2017/07/24/government-propaganda-outlet-fun… Text of Article: Much heralded in the media, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is depicted as championing digital civil liberties and fighting the US government’s mass surveillance. EFF also receives money from the same government that it claims to fight. The Saga of Radio Free Asia In the early 1950s, Radio Free Asia was originally a covert CIA project to help overthrow Communist regimes in Asia. In order to conceal the true source of its funding, Radio Free Asia set up a fundraising campaign in the US, called the Crusade for Freedom. The goal of the fundraising campaign was to supply funds to “…expand the facilities of Radio Free Asia to carry the battle to China’s Red masters behind the bamboo curtain…”. In a blatant lie, the director of Radio Free Asia, John W. Elwood, even told the press, “Because we have no government ties, we can say anything we damn please.” The CIA quickly realized that many people in China did not personally own radios. Instead, listening privately to Western broadcasts inside mainland China was difficult, since most radios were in communal areas. The CIA attached radios to balloons in hopes that they would reach mainland China, but the winds shifted and the radios blew back towards Taiwan. After several years of running into difficulties, the CIA shut down the Radio Free Asia project. According to a news report, the Korean Cultural and Freedom Foundation (KCFF) created a new Radio Free Asia in 1966 to continue broadcasting anti-Communist propaganda to Asia. This new Radio Free Asia was operated by members of the Unification Church. The Unification Church has been described as a cult run by Sun Myung Moon. The Unification Church’s Radio Free Asia had strong ties to the US government. At some point in their political careers, US Presidents Truman, Eisenhower, Nixon, and Ford were all involved with Radio Free Asia. In fact, during the 1950s, Truman and Eisenhower were also involved in the CIA’s original Radio Free Asia project. According to court testimony, a Radio Free Asia fundraiser bribed a Congressman in 1967 to obtain meeting with CIA officials, but the fundraiser was blocked from further testimony due to objections by the Congressman’s defense lawyers. In 1970, a member of the US Congress received a very strange letter from President Park of Korea thanking the US government for its support of Radio Free Asia. The Congressman’s office asked the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) if it was involved in financing Radio Free Asia. The CIA denied providing any funding. In the 1970s, the US Congress investigated the Unification Church. There were allegations that Radio Free Asia was involved in assisting the Korean government to influence members of the US Congress. The Unification Church and Radio Free Asia were also accused of having strong ties to the Korean intelligence service (KCIA). In Congressional testimony, Radio Free Asia was accused of soliciting donations in the US. Allegedly, some of these donations would later be diverted to funding Korean intelligence activities, namely to bribe members of the US Congress. The Unification Church also tried to keep Nixon in power during the Watergate scandal [1]. Sometime around 1975, it is reported that the Unification Church’s Radio Free Asia stopped broadcasting. In the early 1980s, the Unification Church’s founder was convicted in the US of filing false income tax returns and conspiracy to obstruct justice. During a four year period in the late 1970s, the Khmer Rouge is estimated to be responsible for the deaths of over one million people in Cambodia. Some of the leaders of the Khmer Rouge would later be convicted of crimes against humanity in a war crimes tribunal backed by the United Nations. In 1978, Vietnam invaded Cambodia and removed the Khmer Rouge government from power. The Khmer Rouge fled to refugee camps in Thailand. In the 1980s, this created an on-going conflict between Vietnam and Thailand. The US government supplied Thailand with weapons, including aircraft and tanks [2]. The US government has also been accused of supporting the Khmer Rouge against Vietnam. In 1980, a news article described Radio Free Asia as being a joint operation between Thailand and the United States during the Vietnam War. The Thailand government used Radio Free Asia again to broadcast propaganda to Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam [2]. Another news article, appearing in 1990, described a Khmer Rouge brigade commander listening to Radio Free Asia and Voice of America in hopes of hearing news about a peace deal [3]. It is important to note that Voice of America is the US government’s official news outlet abroad. After the Tienanmen Square protests in China in 1989, there was growing interest in the US Congress to resurrect Radio Free Asia. Much like its namesake, the new Radio Free Asia would be dedicated to regime change, but now with a mission of the more politically palatable euphemism to “promote democratic change”. While still publicly claiming to be a private organization, this new Radio Free Asia would be created and funded by the US Congress. It was a case of déjà vu. US Government’s “Internet Freedom” The US Congress normally designates approximately $50 million dollars every year to internet freedom appropriations. This internet freedom funding is normally shared between three US government agencies: the State Department, the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG), and USAID. A portion of the BBG’s internet freedom funding goes towards Radio Free Asia. Some of the US government’s internet freedom funding is rather controversial. The funding goes towards supporting internet freedom projects in countries where the US government would like regime change. Think of countries such as China, Iran, Cuba, Belarus, Burma, Vietnam, North Korea, Russia, etc. The US Congress has even passed legislation tying internet freedom funding to sanctions against Iran to dissuade it from pursuing nuclear weapons. USAID also caused controversy when it financed a project to create a “Cuban Twitter” in hopes of stirring unrest and an uprising against the Cuban government. Recently, the BBG released a document in response to a public records request. Specifically, the public records request was for Radio Free Asia’s internet freedom budget proposal to the BBG. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is listed as a potential vendor on Radio Free Asia’s budget proposal. EFF confirmed by email that it is receiving money from Radio Free Asia for STARTTLs Everywhere and updates to Certbot. The STARTTLs Everywhere project aims to ensure that secure encryption is used between email servers. The Certbot project is designed as a client for EFF’s Let’s Encrypt project. The funding from Radio Free Asia is approximately $200,000. It is difficult to track the type of government funding that EFF receives. The US Congress has passed legislation mandating greater transparency in federal government spending. Earlier this year, a public records request was sent to the General Services Administration (GSA), the federal government agency in charge of accepting these funding transparency reports. In a letter, the GSA stated that it could not find any record of Radio Free Asia ever submitting a single transparency report. Since Radio Free Asia has failed to file the transparency reports, the money that Radio Free Asia gave to EFF does not appear on USASpending.gov, the US government’s funding transparency website. Even though Radio Free Asia was created by the US Congress and is essentially controlled by the US government, Radio Free Asia insists on the fiction that it is a nonprofit organization and is exempt from the federal public records law. Due to the National Defense Authorization Act of 2017 (NDAA 2017)(§ 310(d)), the CEO of a federal agency, the Broadcasting Board of Governors, now has the authority to directly hire and fire some Radio Free Asia employees. Despite several requests, Radio Free Asia refuses to release any records. In effect, this means that the internal records of Radio Free Asia’s bidding and contracting process for its internet freedom program are completely secret. In June of 2015, the Inspector General for the State Department published an audit of Radio Free Asia. In order to help distribute funding for the Open Technology Fund (OTF) program, Radio Free Asia set up the OTF Advisory Council. The OTF Advisory Council was composed of people from industry, nonprofits, and universities. Two of EFF’s employees served on this OTF Advisory Council which evaluated proposed OTF projects. The Inspector General’s audit found that Radio Free Asia failed to follow federal procurement requirements and conflict-of-interest policies. The audit also states that Radio Free Asia required OTF Advisory Council members to sign nondisclosure agreements. The type of funding which EFF received may actually be illegal. The funding which EFF receives from Radio Free Asia falls under the Smith-Mundt Act. The law prohibits the State Department and the Broadcasting Board of Governors (including Radio Free Asia) from using their funding to influence American public opinion. While incidental exposure to an American audience is technically legal, EFF is an influential American organization, and on that basis, its projects may be heavily publicized in the United States. It is difficult to understand why Radio Free Asia continues to fund domestic American organizations even though its funding is only intended to influence foreign audiences (ie. propaganda). In response to questions about EFF receiving government funding, EFF Executive Director, Cindy Cohn stated: “While EFF does not accept U.S. government funding directly, we do accept funds that originated with the U.S. government if they are earmarked for specific technology projects like these. EFF’s technology projects are all open source – the code can be reviewed, added to, or forked by anyone – and have a clear set of technical goals that serve the public interest. They are also publicly hosted, currently on Github. EFF guards its independence fiercely and does not accept funding that has strings attached to advance anyone else’s agenda. We are proud of the role that EFF’s technology projects play in building better, safer, and more free experience for Internet users worldwide.” It is difficult to independently verify EFF’s statement that it does not accept funding with strings attached, because Radio Free Asia refuses to release records on its contracts. EFF’s facebook page states that the organization “fights for freedom primarily in the courts, bringing and defending lawsuits even when that means taking on the US government or large corporations.” The US Congress was very specific in its appropriations that the funding for internet freedom is to serve the US government’s national security and foreign policy interests abroad. Somehow, this funding continues to be directed towards domestic American organizations, such as Tor Project and Open Whisper Systems. While EFF’s government funding remains a small portion of its overall budget, it is not difficult to imagine how a conflict of interest could arise. Will EFF be able to continue fighting the same government which it also accepts money from? Will EFF bite the hand that feeds it? Citations in Print 1. Patt, D. (1978, April 5). Unification Church Tried to Keep Mr Nixon in Power During the Watergate Crisis. The Times, p. 7. 2. Kelly, N. (1980, September 30). Thailand Receives US Arms Amid Reports of Vietnamese Activity. The Times, p. 7. 3. Thayer, N. (1990, July 20). Killing Fields’ Regime’s Fighters Buoyed by Battlefield Successes. The Charlotte Observer, p. 5A. The text of this article is released into the public domain. Anyone is free to translate and republish this article. The featured picture is from Duke University Library.

3 2

Whom you may not criticize? - USA avidly chasing Germany's Zio-laws
by Zenaan Harkness 24 Jul '17

24 Jul '17

Well, well, well ... an amazing yet serious GTFOOH moment: So. As we know, in just over a dozen countries 'tis a criminal offense to verbally challenge the ziocaust narrative, Germany being target #1. Of course in the land of the free, home of the brave North America, the First Amendment guarantees the freedom of speech. Except when (((they))) introduce (arguably, possibly, debatably) illegal statute laws such as H.R. 1697. Goyem, the brazenness on display by (((your rulers))) is something to behold - kiss your first amendment goodbye: US CONGRESS: Israel first First Amendment second http://theduran.com/us-congress-israel-first-first-amendment-second/ Senators and Representatives in the US Congress are attempting to pass legislation which would criminalise the boycotting of Israel and also criminalise the advocacy of such boycotts. The legislation is clearly unconstitutional, yet this hasn't stopped many in Congress from advocating for new restrictive laws. In March of 2017, bills were introduced in the US Senate ( https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/720/text?format=xml ) and House of Representatives ( https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/720/text?format=xml ) which would criminalise support of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement as well as other organisations which advocate for a boycott of Israel and Israeli products. Journalist Rob Wolfe summarised ( http://www.vnews.com/Israel-Boycott-Bill-In-Congress-11374160 ) the effects of the proposed legislation as follows, “The bill, which goes by H.R. 1697 and S. 720, would prohibit · American businesses or individuals engaged in interstate or · foreign commerce from ‘supporting any boycott fostered or imposed · by an international organization, or requesting imposition of any · such boycott, against Israel,’according to a congressional · summary”. ... In case the obvious thin edge of the wedge got missed, the trial run for "criminalization of a boycott by a business" was that well publicized case against the Christian bakery couple who chose to boycott serving a Homosexual couple asking for a "gay wedding cake". Litmus test folks, litmus test it was. So now America gets to have its Zio cake and eat it too. Only real question - are there any USAians not so cowardly they would readily suffer jail for such "crimethink"? Doubtful... She'll be comin' down the gas pipe when she comes; yee haw! She'll be firing the gas oven when she comes; yee haw! She'll be burning first amendments, jailing all free thinkers, She'll be FEMA martial law camps where you're done! It'll be sad from one perspective, cleansing from another - Razer, you wanted something to --really-- go to war over? It's gettin close bro, getting closer by the month!

1 0

protocol for high-profile dissenters to leak without being deaded/murdered/killed/eliminated/shot/heart-attacked etc
by Zenaan Harkness 23 Jul '17

23 Jul '17

"Dum, ways to die, so many dum ways to die." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJNR2EpS0jw and the latest version 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXZhVyYS87A So, former Haitian government official, ready to expose Clinton corruption, found dead: http://theduran.com/former-haitian-government-official-ready-to-expose-clin… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EqdA5FFpqM Yes, Hitlery Clinton's Haitian pedo network was going to be exposed, and the key leaker, of course, "mysteriously" dies. Who could possibly have predicted this? I mean, it's not like the DNC murdered Seth Rich and a dozen Clinton security guards over the years, right? There are some bloody dum people out there folks, and they need our help - at the very least, evidently, some firetrucking basic firetrucking training on HOW THE HELL TO LEAK! This is pissing me off - I mean at least Seth got his leak out before he was post-leakishly murdered, but Klaus Eberwein? Seriously spoke about his intention to leak, before actually leaking? WHAT THE FIRETRUCK IS WRONG WITH PEOPLE?!?!?!?!@##!@$!@#$!@#??!!!! That is just absolutely IN-FIRETRUCKING-INSANE !!! So, fellow cypherpunkers - this is our stock in trade! AND it's our DUTY OF CARE to our fellow humans, to spread the word on BASIC LEAKING PROTOCOL. A very rough draft of possible steps to take: - NEVER talk about your leak/whistleblowing, BEFORE doing it! - Leak your leak to MULTIPLE people simultaneously if possible - either publicly, and or by anonymous post (of documents, CDs, DVDs etc). - Plant a brief tell-all in an unlikely to be read book at the back corner of a public library, and TELL A TRUSTED PERSON that "if I die, go read this book, but not before". - Quietly get up to speed with some op-sec - ask a grandchild to teach you, go to a local computer user group meeting, etc - the basics are not so hard, so LEARN THEM YOURSELF! - Do a trial run of leaking with something newsworthy but RELATIVELY INNOCUOUS. Please add, suggest "hell no!"s etc. Seriously, we are in the middle of a war, and many folks need our help and actual assistance.

6 7