- cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

Cryptocurrency: Binance KYC Leaked, Privacy Problem w Control and Spy State, NSA Did Bitcoin
by grarpamp 08 Aug '19

08 Aug '19

https://reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/cn9nwy/are_we_naive_to_think_t… https://reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/at01hw/for_crypto_to_be_like_c… https://www.binance.com/en/blog/365766157488967680/Statement-on-False-KYC-L… https://reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/cn1iwt/binance_kyc_hacked_pict… https://reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/cn4muv/binance_offers_more_tha… https://www.coindesk.com/binance-kyc-issue https://www.coindesk.com/a-bitcoin-extortion-gone-wrong-inside-binances-neg… https://decrypt.co/4609/binance-kyc-data-breach https://decrypt.co/4648/binance-kraken-exchange-data-haul https://www.ccn.com/hacked-customer-data-from-world-leading-cryptocurrency-… https://reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/9zehgn/warning_kyc_procedure_w… https://fotoforensics.com/tutorial-ela.php https://t.me/newbinance https://t.me/newbinance1 https://t.me/kycimportant https://twitter.com/BnatovP

1 0

Gizmodo: Windows Quietly Patches Bug That Could Reverse Meltdown, Spectre Fixes for Intel CPUs
by jim bell 08 Aug '19

08 Aug '19

Gizmodo: Windows Quietly Patches Bug That Could Reverse Meltdown, Spectre Fixes for Intel CPUs. https://gizmodo.com/windows-quietly-patches-bug-that-could-reverse-meltdown…

1 0

Ars Technica: Silent Windows update patched side channel that leaked data from Intel CPUs
by jim bell 08 Aug '19

08 Aug '19

Ars Technica: Silent Windows update patched side channel that leaked data from Intel CPUs. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2019/08/silent-windows-updat…

1 0

John McAfee: On Life, Privacy, Slavery, America, Crypto, Election, Tax
by grarpamp 07 Aug '19

07 Aug '19

John's Conversation with Victurus Libertas TV https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJpjaiBOfvs Looking good and getting on game for Elections. Stay present my friend. Recently... John with CoinTelegraph https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uutg5WhyAEM John on Cuba, US internal problems https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UflkhOfTU0E John's initial Faraday Chats https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKUyH0UC-oU

2 2

Physicists measure quantum tunneling time to be near-instantaneous
by jim bell 07 Aug '19

07 Aug '19

https://newatlas.com/quantum-tunneling-time-measured-instantaneous/58879/ 1.8 Attoseconds !!!

1 0

Cryptocurrency: Andreas - Privacy, Belief in Cryptography = Bitcoin
by grarpamp 07 Aug '19

07 Aug '19

Andreas Antonopoulos on Privacy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7PBr2wVR-A https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=soeFxWkM5qI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30sjEW70rLE And double illegal immoral and justice, zero knowledge... Democracy, Future of Money... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_aILeOqZEwY

1 0

Surviving Capitalism talks with Amir Taaki
by grarpamp 07 Aug '19

07 Aug '19

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kl0Lliw_ldU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQM2RtRSvQY

1 0

Veracrypt license - how to change it
by Zenaan Harkness 07 Aug '19

07 Aug '19

Hi Stephen, I'm hoping you will know who to contact. The Veracrypt code and therefore license inherits from TrueCrypt. The TrueCrypt code license is declared by the FSF to be a non-free software license, and has been determined by the Debian community to be not distributable by Debian due to its terms. Truecrypt maintained an aloof/ not contactable type of arrangement with the public, then disappeared altogether. In the interests of having Veracrypt be distributable by Debian, all Veracrypt code must be licensed accordingly. This can be done by public notice (see below). Doing so would be somewhat similar to how the MAME community caused their source code license to be changed from "problematic for Debian/ the FSF etc" into something distributable by Debian etc (I think they went to GPL). Here's what the Veracrypt community would need to do: - make a public announcement that they will, after DURATION say 1 year, change the license to all outstanding source code inherited from TrueCrypt, to be Apache/GPL/whatever - include in the announcement that any party objecting must contact the developers at BLAH (email list address, or list of developer email addresses) - wait the DURATION - change the source files to reflect the license change, to be the new license as declared DURATION period prior The announcement needs to be published and made generally publicly available - e.g. at Slashdot, LWN, on the Veracrypt home page, etc. Legally, this does a few things: - gives general public Notice (legal concept), that something will be done in the future, thus satisfying the general duty of care to the public that something will be done which may affect the interests of the public - gives the only possible notice available to be given to the original developers (assuming they are no longer contactable) - provides a genuine and reasonable opportunity for any affected parties to contact the Veracrypt developers and make an actual objection - parties who remain silent, are thereafter (after time period DURATION) "taken to have tacitly consented" The above is legally sufficient to make such a change, and the MAME community is at least one example where this legal technique of Public Notice has been used effectively. If no objections are raised by anyone in DURATION time period, then the Veracrypt developers can at that point unilaterally change the license to be the new/ newly declared license. If an objection -is- raised, and if the person objecting is an actual copyright holder of certain Truecrypt code, then that particular code can thereafter be rewritten. Other than this, objections are unlikely to be legally substantive and may well be able to be ignored. Notwithstanding, all objections should be responded to as to what position is being taken in relation to that objection (this is part of the duty of care to the general public/ others in our community). Kind regards, Zenaan

1 0

Carl Sagan Predicts...
by grarpamp 07 Aug '19

07 Aug '19

https://i.redd.it/qe4js3ndvse31.jpg

1 0

Cloudflare terminates services for 8Chan
by grarpamp 07 Aug '19

07 Aug '19

Here's a bunch of random groups... anyone could make lists on all sorts of activism sectors around the world, any subject, from any side... all of them claiming free speech, that they're exclusively right, and at times basically wishing to, and doing, censor and murder of the other... https://www.stormfront.org/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stormfront_(website) http://www.nsm88.org/ http://www.nsm88records.com/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Daily_Stormer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_white_nationalist_organizations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alt-right https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2019/03/01/how-black-man-outsmarted… https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_pride https://naacp.org/ https://usa.gov/ https://cia.gov/ http://eng.mod.gov.cn/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II2ZbypmVIE hong kong resistance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antifa_(United_States) https://phillyantifa.org/ http://redneckrevolt.org/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_bloc https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men's_rights_movement https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion https://www.noi.org/ https://www.answering-islam.org/ http://www.moqawama.org/ https://hamas.ps/ https://alqassam.ps/ http://www.ikhwanonline.com/ https://thereligionofpeace.com/ http://www.sistani.org/ http://www.sinnfein.ie/ https://www.32csm.org/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_religious_organizations https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/para/index.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_organizations_designated_by_the_SPLC_… https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_organizations_designated_by_the_SPLC_… All above are primary subject sites spewing whatever "disgusting" they spew, unopposed onsite. Many to most of them are protected by CloudFlare... any terrorists, murderers, thieves, slavers among them... are behind CF, thus all endorsed and enshrined by CF as righteous, rightful and right... now that CloudFlare has put itself in the business of judgement by banning only DS and 8chan as "bad", thus all else hosted above and everything else CF hosts, must in fact be "good" in the official eyes of Cloudflare. Yet 8chan, a free and open board where anyone and everyone can and does come to talk about, propose, freely debate, share, understand, each other on all manner of whatever random subjects they want... is banned. That's fucking stupid. That would be like outlawing this... https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=speakers+corner Turning it into these permitted Fake shit... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gje3HiouzvQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZpy7peBTCA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vux1kZyc81o https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKD8BEeBAg0 https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=free+speech+zones The CF censorship is also meant to covering up their own embarrasing fact that they're ignoring and refusing to help their own troubled youth, families, neighborhoods, schools, citizens etc. Meanwhile spending utterly ridiculous amounts of money on gun control, marijuana police, military, fake manufactured political hot buttons, incarceration, spying, etc... all of which are pointless. Also meant to assist crush the right of others to live how they want not being ruled over by, nor harming, anyone else. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/aug/01/conspiracy-theories-fbi-qan… Conspiracy theories like QAnon could fuel 'extremist' violence, FBI says. Social media companies could lessen threat with "significant" crackdown on related content, bureau says. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/aug/04/mass-shootings-el-paso-t… In this article, Govt spy Matthew Prince supported freedom of speech no less than the day before banning 8chan... " "Stormer was an arbitrary decision. I woke up this morning in a bad mood and decided to kick them off the internet... I am deeply uncomfortable with the decision we made. It doesn't align with our principles." Cloudflare faced renewed public pressure over its protection of 8chan in the wake of the Christchurch massacre. And in a phone interview with the Guardian on Saturday night, Prince reiterated his belief that Cloudflare should not cease to provide services to sites such as 8chan based on their content. "If I could wave a magic wand and make all of the bad things that are on the internet go away... and I personally would put the Daily Stormer and 8chan in that category of bad things... I would wave that magic wand tomorrow, Prince said. It would be the easiest thing in the world and it would feel incredibly good for us to kick 8chan off our network, but I think it would step away from the obligation that we have and cause that community to still exist and be more lawless over time. But on Sunday evening, Cloudflare reversed positions, and said it would terminate services for 8chan. Just a day earlier, Prince had argued that keeping "bad" sites within Cloudflare's network means that the company is able to help monitor activity and flag illegal content to law enforcement. While he would not comment on specifics, he said that Cloudflare receives "regular requests" from law enforcement not to ban certain sites. "There are lots of competitors to Cloudflare that are not nearly as law abiding as we have always been," he said. "The minute that someone isn't on our network, they're going to be on someone else's network If you do a search for the Daily Stormer now, it's completely available. They're not gone, and they have bragged themselves that their subscriber counts have gone up. Prince also rejected any implication that Cloudflare's position is self-interested. "The right answer from a pure business perspective is just to kick them off, he said of 8chan. 'Of the 2 million-plus Cloudflare customers, they don't matter, and the pain that they cause is well beyond anything else.' Keeping 8chan within its network is a "moral obligation", he said, adding: "We, as well as all tech companies, have an obligation to think about how we solve real problems of real human suffering and death. What happened in El Paso today is abhorrent in every possible way, and it's ugly, and I hate that there's any association between us and that "For us the question is which is the worse evil? Is the worse evil that we kick the can down the road and don't take responsibility? Or do we get on the phone with people like you and say we need to own up to the fact that the internet is home to many amazing things and many terrible things and we have an absolute moral obligation to deal with that." " Whatever the answer is, it is most definitely not censorship. Speak Freely.

2 1