- cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

Joshua Schulte Trial Huge Collection
by John Young 18 Mar '20

18 Mar '20

<https://t.co/RHWEU0AYmI?amp=1>https://hunter.ddosecrets.com/datasets/86 https://data.ddosecrets.com/file/Joshua%20Schulte.7z (813MB)

1 0

Checks from the government
by John Young 18 Mar '20

18 Mar '20

https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/blog/2020/03/checks-government?utm_source=govd…

1 0

Cryptocurrency: In times of recession, Coronavirus
by grarpamp 18 Mar '20

18 Mar '20

On 3/18/20, Georgi Guninski <guninski(a)guninski.com> wrote: > Cryptocurrency exchange rate at times of recession? > > Dow Jones dropped and according to some we are at or near > recession/financial crisis. > > How are cryptocurrencies going at times of recession/crisis? > > Browsed some rate charts on xe.com and bitcoin appears to > have dropped in the beginning of March. Electric + Internet = Crypto keeps on going. Down 25-50++%, relative shifts, normal. Crypto not yet a top shelf adoption usage, thus can get sold before other assets, for need, or bets in other markets. Halvenings offering attractive inflation rates. Required Privacy and DEX starting to be taken seriously. No currently leading coins expected to handle credit card tx rates, too busy bloating selves by needing chain history and layering on stupid apps, tokens, features, weight, centralized, politics, compute, and metoos... instead of being simple lean high tx distributed cash. Need new coin for that. Central of ASIC manufacture and mining a bit iffy model over more distributed CPU. Regulation and centralized fiat shitcoins are still biggest risks, that's pointless old world, stop supporting either of them if expect to have anything new and free. Mining cycles being temporarily diverted to coronavirus crunching. Crypto coronavirus charity efforts, etc. Crypto hist: ... ~= $1275/$200 2013-2015 ~= ... ~= $20k/$4k 2017-2020 ~= ... ~= ??? Early days, have fun.

1 0

cryptocurrencies in times of recession
by Georgi Guninski 18 Mar '20

18 Mar '20

Cryptocurrency exchange rate at times of recession? Dow Jones dropped and according to some we are at or near recession/financial crisis. How are cryptocurrencies going at times of recession/crisis? Browsed some rate charts on xe.com and bitcoin appears to have dropped in the beginning of March.

1 0

How to Spread Coronavirus on National Media
by John Young 18 Mar '20

18 Mar '20

Fauci Touches Face with Hand on National Media, Trump Touches Mic Emulated by Fauci and Several Attendees, No Recommended Distance Between Any of Them, Trump Handshakes, One Elbow Bump, What Can Go Wrong? https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ETEtcxzWAAECPfW?format=jpg&name=small

4 3

Cryptocurrency: Markets - Facemasks on the Darknets
by grarpamp 18 Mar '20

18 Mar '20

https://i.redd.it/cb3hqtxn0um41.jpg https://i.redd.it/27p7xaw07gm41.jpg https://old.reddit.com/r/deepweb/comments/fj0rce/face_masks/ https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/covid-19-indonesia-illegal-masks-… https://www.digitalshadows.com/blog-and-research/how-cybercriminals-are-tak… Is Price Gouging Immoral? Should It Be Illegal? via LearnLiberty / StudentsForLiberty / InstituteForHumaneStudies https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9QEkw6_O6w

1 0

Re: [tor-relays] Port Forwarding Question
by grarpamp 17 Mar '20

17 Mar '20

On 3/6/20, William Pate <willpate(a)pm.me> wrote: > This constantly trips me up. In my modem settings, I'm offered these options > for port forwarding. I know I need to open 9001, but what do I enter into > the external port fields? > https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20200306/19f4… Tor advertises its ORPort to tor network via descriptor mechanism, the port is in the log output. For default tor config and simple forwarding firewall, enter the same port, typically 9001. Sorry you had to potentially sit idle on your project for almost three days waiting for it to even post to begin get any reply from others. The Tor Project censors running these lists... in part to placate snowbunnies and warriors, to manage image, to demur from some differing pov's and even some facts, to avoid journalist and open critique, etc... seem maybe have some issue with say letting people freely read and information freely timely flow. For example... Were your post to have been noting an attack or security exploit involving tor relays, a whole lot of tor users around the world could have got hurt in the intervening time below. That's really bad. And is the result of such needless "moderation" program Tor Project over everyone, instead of say only over the very rare incorrigible verbally abusive asshole repeatedly going directly into other people. Whereas a few spams now and then, other normal and typical fare, some fire, noise, convo, good args, parts above, etc all lists have from time to time, no big deal, silly to censor them. Tor has big budget to fund that program to click post approve 24x7, they did not even implement that. So relays might need consider non-tpo-list comms to be timely safe. " X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 07:39:43 +0000 ... Received: from protonmail by torproject for tor-relays Fri 6 Mar 2020 16:25:18 +0000 Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 16:25:08 +0000 Subject: [tor-relays] Port Forwarding Question From: William Pate <willpate(a)pm.me> " Have fun with your tor project :)

1 0

The Whole of the Moon
by Peter Fairbrother 17 Mar '20

17 Mar '20

Last one, for now. Please redistribute freely. Peter Fairbrother 4- The Whole of the Moon 17 March 2020 The good news: the worst-hit (or first hit) countries are now stopping their coronavirus epidemics. China has done pretty much stopped their epidemic spreading [1], in South Korea it is dying out [2], in Iran [3] and perhaps Italy [4] it is getting less of a hold, though it is a bit early to say in Italy's case. How can we be sure of that? Simple. The daily numbers of new cases are falling in all those countries, reaching very low levels in China and South Korea. They have all implemented strong isolation, and it is working for them. In none of them have even one thousandth of the population become, or are likely to become, infected (though Italy may come close). There is no known case where strong isolation is failing to stop the infection. China and South Korea are considering restrictions on people entering their countries in order to prevent infected people bringing the disease in, as that is now their major source of new infections. The bad news: the UK's present policy is still to delay the epidemic rather than try to stop it, allowing over 60% of the population to catch the disease at a projected cost of 400,000 UK deaths (UK Government figures). - So why does the UK government still insist strong isolation will not work for us? It doesn't have to be very onerous. Something like this: schools close, as do universities, pubs, public gatgerings. Most people stay at home for perhaps 4 weeks. During that four weeks we make a lot of masks, respirators and other protective gear. We prepare a very large number of tests. We prepare ventilators and people to operate them, and hospital and hospital beds in case the confinement does not work, though it should. We plan. We research the virus. During the fourth week we test anyone who might have the virus. After the four weeks that number should be about one thousand. It is estimated that there are a few tens of thousands of active virus cases now, at the end of the four weeks that should be around five thousand, many of whom will be in hospital and most of the rest will be isolated. After the first isolation period we implement mandatory testing if a doctor or trained nurse or a policy requires it, and mandatory quarantine if infected people do not self-isolate. Medium-term we limit personal contact, wear masks, wash hands, bump elbows, supply handrub. We monitor all suspected infections and contacts. Schools stay closed until we know more, but people mostly go back to work. Until we find a vaccine or cure or the disease dies out, we implement long-term restrictions on entry to the country - perhaps five days quarantine, with a test on the fifth day. That will not catch everybody, but it will probably catch enough people. I suggest UK people already abroad should not have to pay for this, but for UK people leaving then re-entering and foreigners the cost should be included in the ticket price, a bit like airport taxes. That will not be enough to stop the virus completely, but it will be a good start. We will by then have a better idea of which measures are necessary and which are not. Perhaps one or two thousand people will die. We may have to repeat this, or bring in other measures - but like China, South Korea, Iran and Italy, if we persevere we will stop the virus. - But we have to implement strong isolation now - any delay will cost lives. The Government's alternative is to let the virus infect 40 million people or so, just slowing it down a little. On the Government's own figures that will involve four hundred thousand deaths. This delay policy must stop, now. We want to kil the disease, not delay it. - Suppose we try hard to stop the virus and it fails. We will have had time to prepare for the peak, time to build ventilators, time to train staff to use them, time to make masks, time to expand testing, time to provide more hospital beds - time to research the virus, maybe even time to develop a vaccine or cure. But then suppose we try hard and succeed. It seems most other countries will succeed too, and the disease will wither away or remain at a very low level until a vaccine or cure can be found. We know how to do strong isolation for infection prevention, and all the examples in other countries show where it has been tried it is working - we need to do it now. We also need to drop SAGE, the UK Scientific Advisory Committee on Emergencies. Preferably from a great height. [1] Daily New Cases https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/china/ [2] Daily New Cases https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/south-korea/ [3] Daily New Cases https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/iran/ [4] Daily New Cases https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/italy/ Peter Fairbrother Slogans for today: Don't delay the epidemic, kill it. Don't delay, kill the coronavirus. Kill the epidemic, not the people.

1 1

Cryptocurrency: Darkweb Drugs - Australia's Busiest Mail Room
by grarpamp 17 Mar '20

17 Mar '20

Australia's Busiest Mail Room https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYlnpn4b9SY Users shed light on dark internet drug trade https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riluf_4giXg James Martin - How Cryptomarkets are Transforming the Global Trade https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hv-E7naLBq8 Anna Explores https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VCefyVSlUNg Ex Story https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-svmMR4ubhY Ethic Dynamics https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JC7Nwo5T0M https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLATM1IusYesdFjPIQJ8msHUEAV8g83ct-

1 0

Harvard Professor Indited in January for Biological Connections with Wuhan
by Se7en 17 Mar '20

17 Mar '20

Snopes attempts to debunk this as "Mixed". When I first saw this video, I thought it was some kind of hoax because it's that weird recording of a video on a cell phone. It isn't. The links below prove the video. <https://invidio.us/watch?v=RkvV75elFLM> <https://invidio.us/watch?v=4JxM7lauNj8> <https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/28/politics/harvard-professor-chinese-nationals…> <https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/charles-lieber-arrested-coronavirus/> <https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/harvard-university-professor-and-two-chinese… tionals-charged-three-separate-china-related> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_M._Lieber> It is perhaps interesting to note that the majority of his group is Chinese <http://cml.harvard.edu/people/charles-m-lieber> <https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/02/why-did-chinese-university-hire-cha… s-lieber-do-battery-research> (Article snippit below): Lieber was arrested on 28 January on charges of making false statements to U.S. law enforcement officials and federal funding agencies about a collaboration he forged with researchers in China. He was released two days later on a $1 million bond. An affidavit outlining the charges against Lieber notes that in January 2013, he signed an agreement between Harvard and Wuhan University of Technology (WUT) in China. According to the affidavit, “The stated purpose of the agreement, which had a five-year effective term, was to ‘carry out advanced research and development of nanowire-based lithium ion batteries with high performance for electric vehicles.’” Officials at WUT have not responded to requests for comment on their agreement with Lieber. But it outlines just the kind of high-tech work that U.S. prosecutors involved in efforts to investigate Chinese attempts to acquire advanced technology from U.S.-based researchers say they are concerned about. They allege that the Chinese government has used such collaborations to improperly take advantage of the federally funded research enterprise, and gain an edge in economic and military advances. In Lieber’s case, however, the battery angle poses a puzzle. That’s because a search of the titles of Lieber’s more than 400 papers and more than 75 U.S. and Chinese patents reveals no mentions of “battery,” “batteries,” “vehicle,” or “vehicles.” (According to Lieber’s CV, through 2019 he has co-authored 412 research papers and has 65 awarded and pending U.S. patents. The website of the Chinese National Intellectual Property Administration indicates that Lieber has been awarded 11 Chinese patents.) In fact, one U.S. nanoscientist and former student of Lieber’s says: “I have never seen Charlie working on batteries or nanowire batteries.” (The scientist asked that their name not be used because of the sensitivity surrounding Lieber’s case.) -- |-----/ | Se7en / The One and Only! | se7en(a)cock.email / | 0x73518A15BA3C1476 / | https://se7en-site.neocities.org

2 1