- cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

Trust isn't easy: Drawing an agenda from Friday's DDoS Attack and the Internet of Things
by Cecilia Tanaka 30 Oct '16

30 Oct '16

https://www.internetsociety.org/blog/tech-matters/2016/10/trust-isnt-easy-d… ===== OT Warning: - Dear all, I am pretending to be dead to celebrate the Halloween in advance. (+_+) ~ ~ => It's a very, very dead Ceci! I am stinking like Zenaan's messages, keep healthy distance! Please, don't annoy me, if you are a troll. Dreamworks made a cute movie about lovely trolls, full of rainbows, flowers and sweet things. Go watch it if you miss me, instead writing, please. I am deeply dead in the moment and the internet connections in the Hell are horrible. Already tried that Ouija thing, but it doesn't work, exactly like wi-fi in my country. (+_+)* I am not receiving the cypherpunks list messages in the moment, because my lovely Ray Ray -- or another grumpy troll -- decided to send hundreds of "love messages" to me and I am tired. And dead, very dead! Razer, all the p0rn spam was bizarre, but the "Windows 10" spam and the "geriatric diapers free samples" spam were really offensive. You have freaky weird fetishes, dear. Again, search psychological support with urgence please... :( Oh, and remember, I am dead. I am trying to RIP. Don't summon me again, please. Love you, grumpy bastard. Take care. :*

6 12

Re: Please stop posting!
by Cecilia Tanaka 30 Oct '16

30 Oct '16

On Oct 30, 2016 9:40 AM, <cunt.tanaka(a)tutanota.com> wrote: > > Please stop that endless stream of verbal garbage. Some day, obviously, I will stop, but only when I want or when it becomes impossible. Do you need some help to learn how to create filters and/or to meditate until there? ;) Please, my dear, get a life: - your own life. Stop being more boring and annoying than me. It is _not_ healthy for you, for me, for anybody. The world needs good vibes! :) Hey, take it, a brand new cute heart for you! <3 Believe me, you do need it. Be happy, take care and give up of annoying me, please. Get a more interesting hobby. :)

1 0

Fwd: [ PFIR ] There's a new way to take down drones, and it doesn't involve shotguns
by Cecilia Tanaka 30 Oct '16

30 Oct '16

Puuurrr... rom rom rom, meow! <3 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "PFIR (People For Internet Responsibility) Announcement List" < pfir(a)pfir.org> Date: Oct 30, 2016 12:09 PM Subject: [ PFIR ] There's a new way to take down drones, and it doesn't involve shotguns To: <pfir-list(a)pfir.org> There's a new way to take down drones, and it doesn't involve shotguns http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/10/drone-hijacker-gives-hackers-comple… Now, a researcher has demonstrated a significantly more subtle and proactive remedy that doesn't involve shotgun blasts or after-the-fact arrests by law enforcement. It's a radio transmitter that seizes complete control of nearby drones as they're in mid-flight. From then on, the drones are under the full control of the person with the hijacking device. The remote control in the possession of the original operator experiences a loss of all functions, including steering, acceleration, and altitude. The hack works against any drone that communicates over DSMx, a widely used remote control protocol for operating hobbyist drones, planes, helicopters, cars, and boats. - - - There are interesting comments about which common protocols are actually vulnerable to this attack, but perhaps much more to the point -- and this aspect seems to almost always be overlooked in discussions like this even though it should be obvious -- any flyer operating in autonomous mode with the main radio purposely inoperative (it could be programmed to enable briefly for takeoff and landing if necessary) will be invulnerable to such attacks, and still be extremely capable -- in most cases fully able to fly its entire programmed mission without interference. This includes virtually all of the systems based on the widely available open source ArduCopter code.

1 0

totalitarianism - "1984" - Ukraine today
by Zenaan Harkness 30 Oct '16

30 Oct '16

We think of the USA and other Western nations as "erroneously considering that George Orwell's '1984' was a blueprint of what to create rather than a warning of what to avoid" and how bad things are (and yes, things really are pretty bad by important standards and principles of human rights, freedom of travel, freedom to communicate) yet we also consider "that relatively speaking, we have it pretty good compared to the days of the inquisition, to pick a random historical example". Well, pity the folks failing to withstand the onslaught of fascist think, open and invited encouragement to inform on your neighbours - and many people doing so, and many journalists and other folk suffering extended prison sentences as a result. Today. In the CIA's latest little "regime change exercise" in Ukraine. With a Ministry of Truth (Ministry of Information) functioning right out of Orwell's pages, with various phrases which cannot be spoken, certain political parties banned and various films and TV shows banned in the country, Ukraine excels at fascism like few other countries today can compete with. This is quite astounding from one perspective, but certainly a timely reminder of one of the realities that humans can live and be towards one another, today, as in here and now in an Eastern "European" country. This particular insight stands out: "According to Arendt totalitarian movements and states have in common the conception of an objective enemy. Totalitarianism can hardly exist without such a conception. After all, it must explain to the popular masses the reasons why it needs to restrict their civic rights and why they must endure total control" We have before us, a real life, real time example of a nation (the Western part at least) of Ukraine that is evidently descending in specific and public ways, into a fascist totalitarian state - lest anyone think for a moment that such realities were somehow 'behind' us forever more... Post-Maidan Ukraine Has Become a Full Fledged Totalitarian State https://opendemocracy.net/od-russia/volodymyr-chemerys/totalitarian-tendenc…

1 0

IPFS via Tor
by Mirimir 30 Oct '16

30 Oct '16

So hey, IPFS works with a Tor/OnionCat-linked proxy even better than Freenet does :) Or LizardFS. Because IPFS is a bloody swarm, and it seems fine with latency. Also, as with Freenet, it seems possible to extend the IPFS swarm into OnionCat IPv6 address space. So one could add stuff to IPFS from several onions, access it via IPFS gateways (clearnet and onion) and tolerate considerable loss of source onions. And speed is impressive! My Freenet/OnionCat guide at erehwon.dev.null <http://dbshmc5frbchaum2.onion/Freenet-OnionCat.html> loads rather slowly, given high latency with multiple proxy layers. But after adding from my node to IPFS, it loads quickly via the official IPFS gateway: <https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmP9FXUN3t8yUJnJerkj57cfzFYbgPmKV2QsCY8M2NHFqf /Freenet-OnionCat.html>. It also loads quickly via a volunteer public onion gateway: <http://ipfs4uvgthshqonk.onion/ipfs/ QmP9FXUN3t8yUJnJerkj57cfzFYbgPmKV2QsCY8M2NHFqf/Freenet-OnionCat.html>. The downside is that, by default, nodes route for the entire IPFS swarm. That currently means ~2 GB per day. But that can be decreased substantially by running in dhtclient mode. OnionCat-only nodes would be probably be OK with that, and only clearnet/OnionCat gateways would need full routing. Alternatively, one could have an isolated IPFS swarm in OnionCat IPv6 address space, with much less throughput.

1 0

"You have to legalize drugs to win that war [on drugs]." - Trump
by donkdick＠sigaint.org 29 Oct '16

29 Oct '16

> Razer: > "No vote" IS a vote 'dumbfuck'. Yes, but it is not a vote for those not voted for.

1 0

Immunity for Hillary's staff?
by jim bell 29 Oct '16

29 Oct '16

http://www.wsj.com/articles/jim-comeys-blind-eye-1475191703 [partial quote follows] By KIMBERLEY A. STRASSEL Sept. 29, 2016 7:28 p.m. ET 1067 COMMENTS Two revealing, if largely unnoticed, moments came in the middle of FBI Director Jim Comey’s Wednesday testimony before the House Judiciary Committee. When combined, these moments prove that Mr. Comey gave Hillary Clinton a pass. Congress hauled Mr. Comey in to account for the explosive revelation that the government granted immunity to Clinton staffers Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson as part of its investigation into whether Mrs. Clinton had mishandled classified information. Rep. Tom Marino (R., Pa.), who was once a Justice Department prosecutor and knows how these investigations roll, provided the first moment. He asked Mr. Comey why Ms. Mills was so courteously offered immunity in return for her laptop—a laptop that Mr. Comey admitted investigators were very keen to obtain. Why not simply impanel a grand jury, get a subpoena, and seize the evidence? Mr. Comey’s answer was enlightening: “It’s a reasonable question. . . . Any time you are talking about the prospect of subpoenaing a computer from a lawyer—that involves the lawyer’s practice of law—you know you are getting into a big megillah.” Pressed further, he added: “In general, you can often do things faster with informal agreements, especially when you are interacting with lawyers.” The key words: “The lawyer’s practice of law.” What Mr. Comey was referencing here is attorney-client privilege. Ms. Mills was able to extract an immunity deal, avoid answering questions, and sit in on Mrs. Clinton’s FBI interview because she has positioned herself as Hillary’s personal lawyer. Ms. Mills could therefore claim that any conversations or interactions she had with Mrs. Clinton about the private server were protected by attorney-client privilege. Only here’s the rub: When Ms. Mills worked at the State Department she was not acting as Mrs. Clinton’s personal lawyer. She was the secretary's chief of staff. Any interaction with Mrs. Clinton about her server, or any evidence from that time, should have been fair game for the FBI and the Justice Department. Ms. Mills was allowed to get away with this “attorney-client privilege” nonsense only because she claimed that she did not know about Mrs. Clinton’s server until after they had both left the State Department. Ergo, no questions about the server. [end of partial quote] Jim Bell

3 5

[WAR] Global South grows an extra pair of nads: Duterte: "America has lost"
by Zenaan Harkness 29 Oct '16

29 Oct '16

>From the ever globally south aligned Pepe Escobar, a reminder that we can no longer say it's only Putin who gives nads to the global south :) ** 'America Has Lost' in the Philippines as Duterte Calls for Alliance with Russia and China http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2016/10/25/america-has-lost-in-philip… ------------------------------------------------------------ by Pepe Escobar on Sat, Oct 29, 2016 «Your honors, in this venue I announce my separation from the United States… both in military and economics also».Thus Philippines President Rodrigo «The Punisher» Duterte unleashed a geopolitical earthquake encompassing Eurasia and reverberating all across the Pacific Ocean.And talk about choosing his venue with aplomb; right in the heart of the Rising Dragon, no less.Capping his state visit to Beijing, Duterte then coined the mantra – pregnant with overtones - that will keep ringing all across the global South; «America has lost».And if that was not enough, he announced a new alliance – Philippines, China and Russia – is about to emerge; «there are three of us against the world». A brief history of the big false flag attacks in the last 100 years: ** False Flag Attack Coming in Syria as Americans Sleepwalk Into World War III http://www.wakingtimes.com/2016/10/12/false-flag-attack-imminent-syria-glob… ------------------------------------------------------------ by Isaac Davis on Sat, Oct 29, 2016 Americans are sleepwalking into World War III, and as events in Syria are shaping up it could come any moment as the biggest October surprise ever. At this stage in the conflict, we are one minor event away from all out war between the world’s major super powers, an event which would most certainly result in nuclear war. All that is needed is for the right type of false flag event to serve as provocation.

1 0

"You have to legalize drugs to win that war [on drugs]." - Trump
by Hugh G. Johnson 29 Oct '16

29 Oct '16

> Shawn K. Quinn: > a vote for Jill Stein or Gary Johnson > (or for that matter, a vote for Charlie Brown or Santa Claus) > could potentially help Rump win. A vote for one is not a vote for another, dumbfuck; amazing ray says votes don't matter.

3 2

[SAKER] Feudalism, Then & Now
by Zenaan Harkness 29 Oct '16

29 Oct '16

A simple graphic from The Saker, comparing medieval feudalism to modern corporate feudalism. http://thesaker.is/feudalism-medieval-and-modern/ Direct link to the image (there's no associated text): http://thesaker.is/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Feudalism-now-and-then-1024x8… ~240KiB

1 0