- cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

Jordan Peterson fully recovered from bowel-cancer
by professor rat 26 Nov '20

26 Nov '20

https://www.google.com/search?q=pink+panzer&client=opera&hs=0NJ&source=lnms…

1 0

XTIAN Scum attack peaceful Gamers
by professor rat 26 Nov '20

26 Nov '20

300 AD and Xtian's begin mutilating and murdering in the name of Jesus. And they are still at it 1700 years later, even if gamblers were their first target. In this homily, Melito formulated the charge of deicide, which has been taken to mean the author accused Jews of responsibility for the crucifixion of Jesus. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peri_Pascha#Charges_against_the_Jews What a disgusting and disgraceful religion, Xtians believe in! Totally unacceptable. If there was a monstrous three-headed Xtian God it would be necessary to destroy it.

1 0

Vladimir Putin needs killing ( My 200 Kopeks )
by professor rat 26 Nov '20

26 Nov '20

http://www.stiffs.com/celebrity/vladimirputin KGB KUNT DROP DEAD.

1 0

LIST Nazi's - The Three " Amigos "
by professor rat 26 Nov '20

26 Nov '20

Getting a clearer picture of these Nazi Fags. Gramps is the Obese Hairy Bear type. Darkness is effeminate eunuch and Batshit ...well...a picture says a thousand words... https://www.google.com/search?q=Pulp+Fiction+Gimp&client=opera&hs=zxI&sourc…

1 0

Jordan Peterson Plagiarist
by professor rat 26 Nov '20

26 Nov '20

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_Röhm

1 0

BARR calls Trump a criminal
by professor rat 26 Nov '20

26 Nov '20

Three different times during Bill Barr’s confirmation to be Attorney General, he agreed that agreeing to pardon someone for false testimony — as Donald Trump just did for Mike Flynn — would be a crime. Patrick Leahy, specifically invoking Barr’s sanction of the Caspar Weinberger pardon that squelched the Iran-Contra investigation, asked Barr about pardons. Leahy: Do you believe a president could lawfully issue a pardon in exchange for the recipient’s promise to not incriminate him? Barr: No, that would be a crime.

1 0

A superimposition of anarchism in a digital context!
by professor rat 26 Nov '20

26 Nov '20

No. I'm only accepting that machine the pentagon rejected - PAM FutureMaps - to state the obvious, they don't need any 'prediction market'. US govcorp can murder anyone they want at any time. .." That is bleeding obvious so PAM FutureMaps offered an improvement in targeting procedures. Even gutless, witless, dickless Rothbardian MORONS like Het, Gramps, Darkness, etc could bet on PENTAGON STAFF! TIMOTHY " An anonymous computerized market will even make possible abhorrent markets for assassinations and extortion " C. MAY 1992 TIM " I guess now that the Pentagon is setting up a murder pool it can't be illegal for us to do it" MAY. 2003 The Policy Analysis Market (and FutureMAP) Archive by Robin Hanson http://mason.gmu.edu/~rhanson/policyanalysismarket.html some more obvious stuff : 1) 'prediction markets' don't exist. The name is jargon used by fake libertarians and wall street fascists(go figure). There's only GAMBLING. 2) something like the 'futures market' for potatoes doesn't predict fuck. It's just a means for GAMBLERS to GAMBLE on the price of potatoes. 3) this 'prediction' idiocy is unsurprisingly used by jim bell who is clearly able to come up with the most idiotic bullshit ever. "I speculated on the question of whether an organization could be set up to legally announce " Damn the Slam PAM Plan! Canceling the Pentagon's futures market is cowardly and dumb. By James Surowiecki (SLATE article from 2003 ) "...the US Government had been planning a website that would enable people to place bets on the likelihood of terrorist events. It was hoped that a study of market trends would enable intelligence agencies to anticipate and prevent such events..." - R.Sukumaran. 2004 WET-Code-Work. "A sufficiently large market predicting an individual's death is also, necessarily, an assassination market" NICK SZABO. 2015. GAMBLE on ANARCHY! DEADPOOL the POTUS! https://stiffs.com/celebrity/donaldtrump Augur @AugurProject Your global, no-limit betting platform. Batshit Crazy MORON - the Black Knight of Cypherpunks is here to stop us gambling! Break a fucking leg, moron.

3 2

"total breakdown of fabric of society"
by Zenaan Harkness 26 Nov '20

26 Nov '20

"The Alt-Right is simply Zionism for White Europeans. Jews have an ethnostate with a wall and Jew-only immigration. If you hate the Alt-Right you must be an anti-semite." “We’ve never seen Richard Spencers like this before. We are witnessing the rise of a new breed of Spencer.” -New York Times “There’s a feeling in the air, as if Spencerism is going to unleash a hellish inferno of rebranded white supremacy on Texas.” -USA Today WaPo: “Texas is reaching a type of ‘Maximum Richard Spencer Overdrive,’ which at best will result in a national existential crisis. At worst, we could be facing a total breakdown of fabric of society, inducing a Walking Dead type scenario.” -Washington Post http://www.dailystormer.com/live-at-texas-am-the-dawn-of-richard-spencer/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlbLNWIFEY0 ~800MiB ("best") -- * Certified Deplorable Neo-Nazi Fake News Hunter (TM)(C)(R) * Executive Director of Triggers, Ministry of Winning * Weapons against traditional European values: http://davidduke.com/jewish-professor-boasts-of-jewish-pornography-used-as-…

4 18

Censorship: Snowden and Greenwald on the Matter
by grarpamp 26 Nov '20

26 Nov '20

https://greenwald.substack.com/p/video-interview-with-edward-snowden https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qEuKCS-czU Censorship: Snowden and Greenwald " VIDEO: Interview with Edward Snowden on Silicon Valley Censorship, Biden, and Lurking Press Freedom Dangers How did we travel so far from the original vision of the internet as the one place humans could communicate and organize free of state and corporate control? Glenn Greenwald 18 hr ago 132 90 The NSA reporting of 2013, enabled by the heroic whistleblowing of Edward Snowden, was widely perceived at the time time to be about violations of the right to privacy. It was, of course, about that, but the revelations implicated numerous other vital liberties, including free speech, a free press, the need for transparency over state actors and especially the always-lurking security state, and the dangers of allowing governments to make the most consequential decisions in the dark, with no democratic consent or accountability. But the overarching cause uniting all of those specific concerns was a belief in and defense of internet freedom. In one of the earliest interviews we conducted with Snowden in Hong Kong, he explained that he was driven in large part by the central, vital role which the early version of the internet played in his life: one that was free of corporate and state control, that permitted anonymity and exploration free of monitoring, and, most of all, fostered unrestrained communication and dissemination of information by and among citizens of the world without corporate and state overlords regulating and controlling what they were saying. It was that Wild West vision of the internet that led so many to herald it at its inception as one of the greatest and most potent innovations in modern history for fostering individual freedom, human liberation, empowerment of ordinary citizens, and the ability of people to organize and communicate without having to depend on corporate giants and the governments they fund and control. In many ways, that vision is a faint memory — submersed in the mass surveillance Snowden exposed but which still persists, the corporatization of the most influential online venues and, increasingly, the control over the flow of speech and information by unseen oligarchical overlords whose decrees require no identifiable rationale and afford no appeal. The power of these unseen discourse-regulators is final, arbitrary and absolute. It does not have to be this way. A free internet is still worth fighting for and is still salvageable. But it faces growing threats: from corporate media outlets eager to suffocate anything that threatens their discourse-monopoly by ginning up pressure on Silicon Valley to censor various dissidents and independent voices even more so than they are now; from political parties and politicians who wield great influence with tech giants and know they can exploit that influence to silence their critics and adversaries; and the increasing concentration of power over the internet in the hand of a few monopolies whose power and wealth makes it irresistible for power centers to try to harness to suffocate dissent. On Monday I spoke with Snowden for a special episode of SYSTEM UPDATE, for roughly 40 minutes about the growing dangers of Silicon Valley censorship, why a tech industry that never wanted the power or responsibility to regulate discourse has had that obligation foisted upon them by politicians and journalists, the lurking dangers to press freedoms, and how a Biden/Harris administration may make all of this worse: "

1 0

FOR Gramps, the Darkness and STASI
by professor rat 26 Nov '20

26 Nov '20

Don't say I never do anything for you Nazi faggots https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-strange-strange-story_b_136697

1 0