- cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

Re: [tor] Re: torservers.net future
by John Young 18 Jun '20

18 Jun '20

Barton Gellman claims in Dark Mirror that NSA hacked Tor Browser Bundle. (pp.79-81). Snowden warned "disable the fucking Javasripts." https://twitter.com/Cryptome_/status/1265658170195804164 At 10:27 AM 5/27/2020, you wrote: >From: Vasilis <andz(a)torproject.org> >To: torservers(a)freelists.org >Subject: Re: [tor] Re: torservers.net future > >Hi all, > >Any news? > > >Regards, >~Vasilis >-- >PGP Fingerprint: 8FD5 CF5F 39FC 03EB B382 7470 5FBF 70B1 D126 0162 >PGP Public Key: >https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-fingerprint/8FD5CF5F39FC03EBB38274705FBF… > >

5 4

Trump: "This is for the children" -- Fw: Trump Submissions Proof
by Zenaan Harkness 18 Jun '20

18 Jun '20

If you can bear a little Javascript for a moment, a bunch of images in this Twitter tomb. If even 10% of this is true, things may be a little on the up and up... Remember, Trump is still alive, unlike JFK. It is not time to relax, there's a great reckoning happening, so now is the time to double down on diligence, prep, constructive and healing actions in this our shared world - whatever be your "cerate" thing, get to... Pray da powerful prayer, muffas... now is the time. ----- Forwarded message from Gil May <gilmay97(a)gmail.com> ----- From: Gil May <gilmay97(a)gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 19:29:48 +1000 Subject: Fwd: Fw: Trump Submissions Proof Very Interesting if correct????? Tying up the loose ends? Trump Submissions Proof If you scroll down this twitter link you will see that DJT and the earth alliance forces were showing their absolute dominance over many world leaders from 2017: https://twitter.com/3days3nights/status/1272920296190808065 ----- End forwarded message -----

1 0

MINISTRY: Disney, others bail on all advertising with Tucker Carlson - Tuck's ratings now #1 - [PEACE]
by Zenaan Harkness 17 Jun '20

17 Jun '20

You can't cuck the Tuck and although you may not agree with all he says, Tucker Carlson is on fire - both in ratings now surpassing all others in America, including Hannity and Ingraham (giving Fox the top three shows in North America today), and seen in the opposition by the Zio stream media with Disney, T-Mobile and others boycotting Carlson by pulling all their advertisements - which couldn't possibly have --anything-- to do with Tucker ripping them a new one over their Zerohedge boycott :D A Tucker fan on Twitter gets one thing wrong though - they say "Disney, T-Mobile, Papa John’s & Vari are pandering to mob lunacy' - which is very, very incorrect. The truth is that "the mob lunacy" is simply that which amplified by the lame stream media such as CNN, MSNBC and Associated Press - they CHOOSE exactly what to amplify, what to publish, what to proclaim that they proclaim is "community voices" and "peaceful profesters" (who are actually, in actual fact, rioters, and anything but peaceful) and therefore it is THEIR OWN MSM/ Zionist agenda of Western and goy destruction, that thay, the MSM, are creating! The lame stream Zio media IS the heart of Cancel Culture - they create it. This is why Tucker, Zerohedge and others are being demonetized and deplatformed - they are failing to pretend that the CNN/MSM/NPC narrative is true and are instead exposing something much closet to actual facts. And the result of this is what we see more and more - the more truth someone like Tuck speaks, in the face of the abundace of MSM lies around him, the more popular he becomes, and the "strange" "wisdom" of Disiey etc removing their advertising from shows that get -more- popular ... Enjoy this time folks, prep for the second wave which Goldman Sachs assures us is right around the corner, and pray for a better future - if ever there were a time to start speaking personally to your guardian angel, surely now is the time. Tucker Carlson Eclipses Competition As Ratings Go Through The Roof https://www.zerohedge.com/political/tucker-carlson-eclipses-competition-rat… .. Carlson's winning streak continued on Monday with 4.2 million viewers, followed by Hannity at 3.7 million and Ingraham at 3.1 million. ...

1 0

Re: Up Front Discussion
by Karl 17 Jun '20

17 Jun '20

Ehh I read "there may be a chance" prior to what you wrote, which I still see quoted below. I hear it as assuming low likelihood of what comes after. Just looking for collaboration, Zenaan. I github'd you and found IQNets with its empty codebase: do you guys need help taking that somewhere? Since iqnets replaces tor and has no code in it, it looks pretty legit, although I wouldn't expect that to make sense to anybody. I've calmed down and am remembering to take you out of the To: field this time. Sorry about that. I've struggled for years against many obstacles to move forward on reliable logging and was excited to see Jim's project. On Sat, Jun 13, 2020, 10:46 AM Zenaan Harkness <zen(a)freedbms.net> wrote: > Seems you misread what I wrote... > > I wrote "this project could have a positive net effect" ... > > Did you misread my words? > > > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 10:19:43AM -0400, Karl wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2020, 8:06 AM Zenaan Harkness <zen(a)freedbms.net> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 06:29:30PM -0400, Karl wrote: > > > > Checking to see if anybody is interested in working on this, possibly > > > with > > > > me, on the software side. I don't know you and am half crazy, but I > > > still > > > > know some code. > > > > > > > > grarpamp, Jim said the device has room for an SDR. A generalized > secure > > > > network would also be a great thing. > > > > > > > > I have not read most of this list, if that's not obvious. I read > source > > > > code a lot better than english. > > > > > > > > > There may be a chance this project could have a positive net effect. > > > > > > > <cries> > > > > Zenaan how can you assume in public like this that this project is > > horrible, without any discussion of its merits, on a thread about working > > on it with no other replies? > > > > Have I hurt you? Does this project hurt you? > > > > You collapse all our impact into one "net effect" and say it is bad! I > > have tried to kill myself repeatedly, Zenaan, and it just gets you locked > > in a hospital still alive, crying and wishing you could die! We need to > > try to do something with our efforts! > > > > What projects are you working or dreaming of? > > > > > > > In terms of device, step PRIMARY, is to free you and your users from > the > > > clutches of google/apple etc. For example the Librem 5 may be a good > base > > > platform on which to add any daughter board you guys come up with... > > > > > > > At the very least, rooting your mainstream 'tard-phone is likely up on > > > your list already, of course. > > > > > > Good luck, > > > >

3 6

Attempt to Log Handling Compromise Severely Resisting Discovery
by Karl 17 Jun '20

17 Jun '20

I have just videotaped bash removing a command from my bash history every time I execute it, using a phone that has been in airplane mode since factory reset, and also most of its life since purchase.

2 2

CNBC: Zoom reverses course, will give end-to-end encryption option to all users
by jim bell 17 Jun '20

17 Jun '20

CNBC: Zoom reverses course, will give end-to-end encryption option to all users. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/17/zoom-will-give-end-to-end-encryption-option…

1 0

The Washington Post: Elite CIA unit that developed hacking tools failed to secure its own systems, allowing massive leak, an internal report found
by jim bell 17 Jun '20

17 Jun '20

The Washington Post: Elite CIA unit that developed hacking tools failed to secure its own systems, allowing massive leak, an internal report found. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/elite-cia-unit-that-develo…

3 2

HCPP20 Digital Totality
by Faux Dameron 17 Jun '20

17 Jun '20

>From Twitter: https://twitter.com/Paralelni_polis We do not know if there will be a second wave of COVID-19. But we know for sure the #HCPP20 will happen this year. Whether in a physical world or a virtual one. Alarming, topical, and disturbing, reflecting the rise of Digital Totality. https://hcpp.cz This is one of the last active cypherpunk/crypto-anarchist conferences to be still held yearly. I was incredibly lucky to attend and participate last year and I thought this would be one of the best places to spread the word. fd

1 0

Re: Personal Black Box? Vuze+ Camera system.
by jim bell 17 Jun '20

17 Jun '20

On Tuesday, June 16, 2020, 11:34:18 PM PDT, jim bell <jdb10987(a)yahoo.com> wrote: (this mail was bounced a few times due to the failure of the server, I think.) I just sent the following to the manufacturer of the Vuze+ camera system: https://vuze.camera/camera/vuze-plus-camera Among a group of people on an email list, I am trying to spur the development of a wearable "360-degree" camera system that could use your Vuze+ device as a major component. However, some level of expansion will be necessary, to be achieved by inclusion of other components. 1. Expansion of the data stored to substantially greater than "2 hours", probably using a commercial SSD device. (not merely larger SD cards, especially since their capacity at any level of technology are limited.) 2. Expansion of the battery capacity to substantially greater than (2 hours), probably using a commercial battery pack. 3. All or most of the data stream generated should be transmitted, perhaps by WiFi, to a nearby person or people, each carrying a storage system, there to be stored locally. (each such person may, or may not, carry a similar camera system.) The purpose of this precaution is to ensure that even if the device is completely and instantly lost or destroyed, most of the data remains available. 4. Some portion of the data will be transmitted, presumably by 4G or 5G, possibly so that it can be placed on a website and live-streamed. Due to the data capacity limitations of 4G, or even 5G, I anticipate that only a fraction of the entire data stream can be immediately exported in this way. Perhaps, for example, only one of every two, or only one of every 3, or only one of every 4, or even less, of the frames in the video can be exported by 4G or 5G. One reason for the capacity limitation, I anticipate, is that I expect that this system may be used in a crowd, where hundreds of other people nearby may be also recording and transmitting video. My understanding is that your product compresses video data. But for my purposes, it is importantant that it not be necessary to transmit the entire video stream: It should be possible to separate the data so that the portion of the data being tranmitted (say by 4G or 5G) can recover a useable portion of the video. I realize that this might only transmit a fraction of the frames, and thus the output will be jerky, but I understand that this will an unavoidable limitation of the system. What I do not know is if the compression provided in your Vuze+ (or other products) will be compatible with this handling of the data. A data compression system that only allows "all" of the data to be generated and transmitted would be a problem. I can see from your product's description that it contains WiFi 4 (802.11n) and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wi-Fi states that this can handle a linke of "72-600" megabits/second. But I also notice that your product has one option of generating 80 megabytes per second, and that would be 640 megabits per second. Does that mean that your device can, or cannot, transmit the camera's output in real-time by WiFi?Also, is there any prospect of upgrading the WiFi capability of your product to WiFi5 or higher, and thus allow the transmission of (802.11ac) , or "433–6933 Mbit/s"? Along with carrying your Vuze+ camera device, I anticipate that the cameraman will be carrying: a. A commercial battery pack, to augment the other battery packs in your device, and in a smartphone, and to supply a SSD device. b. A SSD device, perhaps with the capability of storing 1, 2, or more terabytes of video data. c. The entire arrangement will probably be controlled by a near-state-of-the-art commercial smartphone, ideally one which is capable of 5G data transmission. While it is said that a fully-implemented 5G system will allow transmission of as much as 10 gigabits/second, I also understand that to achieve this data rate will require installation of substantially advanced neighborhood hardware, which will probably only occur over a period of years. Dpes it appear to you that the system I anticipate can be built, in part using your Vuze+ camera system, or perhaps one of your other systems? [end of message to the Vuze+ manufacturer] -------------------------------------- On Monday, June 15, 2020, 04:58:07 PM PDT, jim bell <jdb10987(a)yahoo.com> wrote: I've done some more research, and it seems that existing components could do a substantial part of this project. Consider the Vuze camera, specifically the Vuze+. https://vuze.camera/ It has 8 cameras, in four pairs, aiming in the horizontal plane, and is able to use them to record stereoscopic views. https://vuze.camera/camera/vuze-plus-camera This MIGHT be even better than I anticipated. This device refers to recording data on SD cards. Great, unless the device is smashed or stolen. I consider it to be an essential part of this device that it port a substantial fraction of the data away from the cameraman, perhaps many tens of meters away. But it mentions WiFi: Does that mean that the entire data stream can be transmitted? Even if the data can be only transmitted 'nearby', say 30-100 meters away, by WiFi, that would be a great feature. The specification sheet https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/91Hcr5ModJL.pdf mentions a data rate of 120 MB/second or 80MB/second. Note that it's MB, meaning megaBYTE per second, not merely megabit/second. The specs say that the data is written to a SD card. Can this be expanded using a 1 terabyte (or larger) SSD? Unclear. The data is compressed to MP4. It also mentions: WiFi IEEE 802.11b/g/n 2.4 GHZ I can tell, from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wi-Fi that WiFi4, 802.11n can do a link from: "72-600 million bits per second". Already, I see a hitch: Does this mean that this device can transmit 80MB x 8 bits, or 640 megabits/second, since the link can only go to "600 million bits per second". While it would be nice to be able to transmit the entire data stream locally, as long as all that stream goes into a local SSD, I suppose it would be okay if "only" half the data, say 320 megabits/second, were transmitted by WiFi to another portable system carried by a different person a few tens of meters away. But one question I have is this: Can the data stream be readily 'split up', so that only a portion of it is transmitted? Or is it an 'all or nothing' sort of thing? And I think it's important that a smaller fraction of the data be transmitted by 4G or 5G cell data. Jim Bell

1 0

"batshit insane Austrian school blog" too influential for the (((Gewgles))) - demonetized by Google
by Zig the N.g 17 Jun '20

17 Jun '20

TFW your "batshit insane Austrian school blog" has become so influential, the (((lame stream Jewdia))) blackbans and demonetizes you, and even Jack "made billionaire king by the Jewish bankers" Dorsey is not allowed to 'follow' your stream :D Folks, by just about relevant measure in this period of history, ZeroHedge is kicking that ball right outta the park :) (Hey, they got more feathers in their cap than most these days - not particularly hard to do, but most are evidently too compromised to be able to do so ... amazing times hey.) What the Demonrats fail to realize is that, no matter how sophisticated their 'ban/ shadow ban/ demonetize' protocol is, ultimately every such "shut it down" success is another feather in the cap of him who is targetted (look up the Streissand Effect if you missed that memo). Remember goys and gals, Google is a censor, influencer, chooser, therefore a publisher. Google Demonetizes Zero Hedge https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/google-demonetizes-zero-hedge

1 0