- cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

Recreational pharmaceuticals by genetic engineering
by zeynepaydogan 14 Apr '22

14 Apr '22

I wondered what was written on this list the day I was born.Apparently, Tim may wasn't just a fascist, he was a biased man.I have a lot of single friends, and they're all cleaner than married people.Being clean is one's own choice.I think Tim may says that only women clean. 2 years ago, my best friend got married and she doesn't like to clean:)When I go to her house, I clean things up, for example, in the oven, it's dirty, and I clean it up.Cleaning is entirely one's own choice.She can cook in a dirty oven, but I don't do that.We are women, but we're different, and some guys are really good at cleaning.Cleaning is a sexless job https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks-legacy/1997-July/077786.html --------------------------------------------------------------- At 10:21 PM -0700 7/9/97, Steve Schear wrote: > I know this is off-topic for the list... > > But why hasn't some cleaver graduate student engineered a common mold or > yeast to yield easily extracted (or directly ingestible) common > recreational pharmaceuticals? Ideally it would be a perpetual source, like > sour dough starter, and easily cultured. Once distributed to the street it > would be impossible to stop or track (since no controlled chemicals would > be required for production). You know, if Jim Bell was still contributing to the list, the chemist in him would surely produce some posts on this. Then, when the narcs and BATFags searched his house and found the inevitable mold on the bread, the curdled milk, etc. (Jim is a bachelor, and a computer person, so the mold, etc. is inevitable) they could add this to the indictment. And "The Oregonian" could breathlessly headline: "Drug-Producing Molds Found in Home of Terror-Chemist." --Tim May

1 0

Jan6: Feds Admit to Running Secret DOJ Commandos
by grarpamp 14 Apr '22

14 Apr '22

Feds Finally Admit to Running Secretive DOJ “Commandos” at Jan. 6 Trump Protests https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/01/breaking-feds-finally-admit-runnin… https://www.newsweek.com/exclusive-secret-commandos-shoot-kill-authority-we… The Department of Justice admitted this week to running secretive DOJ “commandos” at the January 6 protests in Washington DC. Four Trump supporters died that day including two women who were killed by Capitol Hill Police. A third woman was nearly killed but was rescued by Green Beret Jeremy Brown. SHOCKING VIDEO: J6 Political Prisoner and Green Beret Jeremy Brown Rescued Female Trump Supporter from DEADLY US Capitol Police Beating – WOMAN WAS NEARLY KILLED The DOJ Commandos were given “shoot to kill” orders. TRENDING: BREAKING: Georgia Investigators have 'Ballot Trafficker' Who Is Talking -- Admits to Being Paid THOUSANDS in 2020 Election Ballot Boxes Ballot Harvesting Scheme -- 242 Ballot Traffickers Detected Now they’re admitting the government did in fact have commandos at the capitol on Jan. 6. After nearly a year this information is finally coming out. And they accused this website and others of being conspiracy nuts for reporting on the feds in the crowd that day. We will likely never know how many feds were working that day to sabotage the peaceful protests. Newsweek reported: On Sunday, January 3, the heads of a half-dozen elite government special operations teams met in Quantico, Virginia, to go over potential threats, contingencies, and plans for the upcoming Joint Session of Congress. The meeting, and the subsequent deployment of these shadowy commandos on January 6, has never before been revealed. Right after the New Year, Jeffrey A. Rosen, the acting Attorney General on January 6, approved implementation of long-standing contingency plans dealing with the most extreme possibilities: an attack on President Donald Trump or Vice President Mike Pence, a terrorist attack involving a weapon of mass destruction, and a declaration of measures to implement continuity of government, requiring protection and movement of presidential successors. Rosen made a unilateral decision to take the preparatory steps to deploy Justice Department and so-called “national” forces. There was no formal request from the U.S. Capitol Police, the Secret Service, or the Metropolitan Police Department—in fact, no external request from any agency. The leadership in Justice and the FBI anticipated the worst and decided to act independently, the special operations forces lurking behind the scenes. “I believe that DOJ [Department of Justice] reasonably prepared for contingencies ahead of January 6, understanding that there was considerable uncertainty as to how many people would arrive, who those people would be, and precisely what purposes they would pursue,” Rosen later told Congress. He stressed that his department “no frontline role with respect to crowd control,” that they were focused on “high-risk” operations. The contingency units meeting on January 3 included the FBI’s Hostage Rescue Team, the FBI’s national “Render Safe” team, an FBI SWAT team from the Baltimore Field Office, Special Response Teams from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), and the U.S. Marshals Service Special Operations Group… …FBI tactical teams arrived on Capitol Hill early in the day to assist in the collection of evidence at sites—including the Republican and Democrat party national headquarters—where explosive devices were found. FBI SWAT teams and snipers were deployed to secure nearby congressional office buildings. Other FBI agents provided selective security around the U.S. Capitol and protection to congressional members and staff. A tactical team of the Hostage Rescue Team was one of the first external federal agencies to actually enter the Capitol after protestors breached the building. In addition to augmentation of emergency security assets, one team coordinated with the U.S. Capitol Police and Secret Service to provide additional safeguarding of Vice President Pence, who had been moved to the underground parking structure beneath the Capitol, from where he was supposed to evacuate. But Pence refused to leave the building and stayed underground instead. The presence of these extraordinary forces under the control of the Attorney General—and mostly operating under contingency plans that Congress and the U.S. Capitol Police were not privy to—added an additional layer of highly armed responders. The role that the military played in this highly classified operation is still unknown, though FBI sources tell Newsweek that military operators seconded to the FBI, and those on alert as part of the National Mission Force, were present in the metropolitan area. The lingering question is: What was it that the Justice Department saw that provoked it to see January 6 as an extraordinary event, something that the other agencies evidently missed.

1 1

China and Russia seek weapons to destroy US satellites, says Pentagon
by jim bell 13 Apr '22

13 Apr '22

China and Russia seek weapons to destroy US satellites, says Pentagon https://share.newsbreak.com/v6s4440n

2 1

Re: A question for Chameleon
by zeynepaydogan 13 Apr '22

13 Apr '22

Question For John YOUNG John has Facebook and different social media accounts.(Flickr etc..)These accounts were addressed by his email.Anyway There's one thing I'm curious about, so I'm going to ask him a question.I think everyone here will want to know the answer to that question. Why is John on a website, sugarbaby... you used your nickname? I cannot stop laughing

3 4

Ukraine Opens Russian Drone, Finds Canon DSLR Inside | PetaPixel
by jim bell 13 Apr '22

13 Apr '22

https://petapixel.com/2022/04/11/ukraine-opens-russian-drone-finds-canon-ds… Ukraine’s Ministry of Defense has released a video in which a Ukrainian soldier disassembles a Russian military surveillance drone. The teardown revealed a remarkably rudimentary design that features a low-end Canon DSLR camera at its core.

4 4

@a16z crypto decide to back Nym
by professor rat 13 Apr '22

13 Apr '22

"I think the public wants to be able to buy freedom and liberty over the Internet." ( Dumbell ) https://twitter.com/nymproject?lang=en

1 0

A Federal Jury Delivers a Rebuke of FBI Entrapment
by jim bell 13 Apr '22

13 Apr '22

A Federal Jury Delivers a Rebuke of FBI Entrapment https://share.newsbreak.com/v78dq74n

1 0

Re: [External Message Added] City of Miami public records request #22-459
by Gunnar Larson 13 Apr '22

13 Apr '22

Dear Miami Public Records Team: On February 7, 2022 we placed the records request here: https://miami.nextrequest.com/requests/22-459 - Any and all correspondence between the City of Miami concerning CityCoins, MIA Coin and Stacks (STX). Additionally, any and all related correspondence concerning CityCoins, MIA Coin, Stacks (STX), Digital World Acquisition Corp and Harvard Management Company. Miami, today is April 13, 2022 and we have not yet received the corresponding records sought. This memo is to kindly submit a waiver from the Mayor of Miami's office with regards to cost associated with record delivery this month (April 2022). We are thankful to the Miami Records team in facilitating our request. Very Respectfully, Gunnar Larson -- *Gunnar Larson - xNY.io <http://www.xny.io/> | Bank.org <http://bank.org/>* MSc <https://www.unic.ac.cy/blockchain/msc-digital-currency/?utm_source=Google&u…> - Digital Currency MBA <https://www.unic.ac.cy/business-administration-entrepreneurship-and-innovat…> - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip) G(a)xNY.io +1-646-454-9107 New York, New York 10001 On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 9:56 AM PublicRecords(a)miamigov.com < support(a)nextrequest.com> wrote: > -- Attach a non-image file and/or reply ABOVE THIS LINE with a message, > and it will be sent to staff on this request. -- > City of Miami Public Records > A message was sent to you regarding record request #22-459: > > Thank you. The search has been submitted. I will inform you of the results > when they are received. > > View Request 22-459 <https://miami.nextrequest.com/requests/22-459> > https://miami.nextrequest.com/requests/22-459 > > <https://www.nextrequest.com/> > > The All in One Records Requests Platform > > *Questions about your request?* Reply to this email or sign in to contact > staff at City of Miami. > > *Technical support:* See our help page > <https://help.nextrequest.com/knowledge/requester-resources> > > * Too many emails? * Change your email settings here > <https://miami.nextrequest.com/settings> > >

1 0

Content-Addressable Key-Value Store
by professor rat 13 Apr '22

13 Apr '22

BlobVM: Content-Addressable Key-Value Store (without the hierarchical, authenticated nspaces and key expiry of SpacesVM) https://twitter.com/_patrickogrady/status/1514249826292027394 Reposts not endorsements without GCB ( geek-code-block )

1 0

Fwd: [coreboot] Re: Deprecation of the Intel Quark SoC
by Karl Semich 13 Apr '22

13 Apr '22

here's my reply, as things are left atm. i'm thinking some of blockchain collaboration to reduce paranoia. previously, the thread seemed broken into factions, where a pair of people were arguing ferventlty and illogically to remove quark from the tree. they have reasonable points but don't back them up with logic, rather mismatching the logic. with this further disconnection one starts imagining the list breaking into fake lists where participants are surrounded by fake peers who treat them crummily. that's what blockchains and a handful of other p2p techs are designed to avoid ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Karl Semich <0xloem(a)gmail.com> Date: Wed, Apr 13, 2022, 8:10 AM Subject: Re: [coreboot] Re: Deprecation of the Intel Quark SoC To: Patrick Georgi <patrick(a)coreboot.org> Cc: Karl Semich <0xloem(a)gmail.com>, Coreboot <coreboot(a)coreboot.org> On Wed, Apr 13, 2022, 6:26 AM Patrick Georgi <patrick(a)coreboot.org> wrote: > Am 12.04.2022 um 23:54 schrieb Karl Semich: > > Obviously a way to sidestep all this would be to simply test the board > > in question, which is a small investment of money and time. > I appreciate that you volunteer to do that for Quark. Can't be too bad, > it's a small investment of money and time, after all. > Sorry, have I offended you? What is it you read me as saying? Does this seem lengthy or expensive to you? >

1 0