- cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

New York
by Gunnar Larson 12 Jun '22

12 Jun '22

Does she know about the sex crime presentation?

1 0

Yahoo and Twitter
by Gunnar Larson 12 Jun '22

12 Jun '22

Same thing.

1 0

Project Veritas: Self Fact Checking Media are Certified Frauds by Veritas, Like Jan6 Committee Goldston, Twitter Dorsey Gadde Censorship
by grarpamp 12 Jun '22

12 Jun '22

Fraud to use your own fraud organization as check of your own facts. Same goes for the totally corrupt and Democrat controlled Jan6 committee. https://www.projectveritas.com/ https://twitter.com/Project_Veritas https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII https://www.youtube.com/user/veritasvisuals https://www.facebook.com/ProjectVeritas/ https://t.me/project_veritas https://t.me/JamesOKeefeIII https://www.instagram.com/project_veritas/ https://www.instagram.com/jamesokeefeiii/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHVUREOqYS8 CBS Fake Fact Checks BREAKING from Project Veritas: A @CBSNews Broadcast Associate Reveals “Cheap” Way Network ‘Fact Checks’ Themselves Using Their Own Reporting; Admits to News Room Impartiality Issues by “Picking a Side or Leaning One Way.” #ExposeCBS Jan6 Committee's Goldston Killed Robach's Epstein Pedo Story https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPZRhijg2Lc Jan6 Goldston Robach Epstein Twitter Sr. Engineer talks about Elon Musk's takeover on NEW Undercover Footage: “Twitter does not believe in free speech." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TexDrY6AlAw Twitter Hates Free Speech https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjsIdM9oL1w Jack Dorsey Exposed https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OkQgTY5_cF0 Vijaya Gadde Exposed Dorsey-Gadde CensorBanned Hunter Biden's Laptop From Hell, and Everyone Else https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGOjL_NV7UY Dorsey CensorBans Veritas https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vRdNkqcsz1Q Expose Them All https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uokKC-rtQdw Be Brave, Inspiring, A Voice, Become A Whistleblower

1 0

Cryptocurrency: PayPal Bans Colin Wright Evolutionary Biologist
by grarpamp 12 Jun '22

12 Jun '22

https://thepostmillennial.com/colin-wright-banned-from-paypal Paypal bans evolutionary biologist Colin Wright from their services Wright posted PayPal's message on Twitter which read "You can no longer do business with PayPal." Use crypto not paypal.

1 0

next US jewnazi false flag attack
by punk 12 Jun '22

12 Jun '22

start your bets! an obvious choice is 'putin' blowing up something like 10 synagogues in jew york.

1 0

Engaging Brainwashing was: Trojans and Botnets
by Undiscussed Horrific Abuse, One Victim of Many 11 Jun '22

11 Jun '22

On 6/11/22, Undiscussed Horrific Abuse, One Victim of Many <gmkarl(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> but this had to be said. Normally I just write my ideas in the title bar >> of >> file explorer and I don't save them. > > i did this for a couple years > > i'm guessing it's a human-trafficking-surveillance thing, lets people > communicate deniably with keyloggers To add more to this, my experience was roughly of experiencing punishment (some of this was clear and vivid, like systems in the real world grossly misbehaving, or facebook showing me only quite unpleasant things, or being sensitized to things I was very uncomfortable with via continuing rapid exposure, especially during times i was trying to handle being exposed to it), unless I engaged a state of mind where I responded to small indicators of what to do. The state of mind was unfortunately also rather psychotic; seeing messages everywhere, since direct communication was also punished -- and I would respond to things that were not relevant, as well as things that were, and I learned to do this out of fear. I see others doing this too. I try to always act like what is rational and checkable is what's important, when I can pull it off. It seems quite clear to me that psychosis can be learned via extensive gaslighting. When you are in an unreal situation, you learn habits that are unreal. Psychiatrists are generally not fans of that, which can open further conspiracy paranoia. A therapist recently told me that there are things that _present_ the same as a psychosis, but are not _actually_ a psychosis. Maybe that's the big difference, dunno.

1 0

Re: Re[2]: [draft] Defeating Botnets and Trojans: Episode 1
by Nico Verrijdt 11 Jun '22

11 Jun '22

The purpose of my life is spitting out ideas, the one less probable then the other, and people who own the network, and my computer, use (or steal ymmv) what can be used. Normally I don't write to mailing lists, I'm just a lurker, but this had to be said. Normally I just write my ideas in the title bar of file explorer and I don't save them. My schizophrenic and naive mind does compare to a 12 year old ... but I love it still having imagination and creativity. Basic assumptions are wild imho, you easily overlook something. Op vr 10 jun. 2022 om 18:15 schreef enlight <enlight(a)riseup.net>: > you sound like a 12 year old, with naive imaginations. If you have > studied computer science in college, > generally in any computer system, there are some basic assumptions and we > build our foundations on that. > > ------ Original Message ------ > From "Nico Verrijdt" <nicoverrijdt(a)gmail.com> > To "Karl Semich" <0xloem(a)gmail.com>; cypherpunks(a)lists.cpunks.org > Date 07/06/2022 13:53:38 > Subject Re: [draft] Defeating Botnets and Trojans: Episode 1 > > Imho the operating systems we use aren't adequate. > > No single user is 100% accountable for what he/she does on the network. > > I'm not an expert in this field at all, but I thought about this quite a > lot figuring things out. > > Here it goes: > Suppose you implement a blockchain for identities as early in the boot > process as possible, then you find the public key of every user in the > blockchain and can communicate with every user while that user knows you > are connected to him/her. > Now you have a blockchain and can connect to virtually anyone. > But the operating system is still vulnerable to hijacking and you should > verify correctness somehow. Suppose, I'm really not sure if this > effectively works, you implement a hashing function as early as possible in > the compiler, then you can hash the code of the compiler and verify if the > compiler's code changed. Then up to the operating system which you compile > with that compiler and hash the code in its development stages. Now you're > able to connect other users in the network and compare hashes of comparable > computer systems. Maybe there are better alternatives. What happens in > memory is a black box to me, somehow I like to hash and compare that too, > and I understand that our computers become quite a lot slower. > > Privacy issues do arise with this system, but it's nothing more than in > real life where you meet someone and say 'Hi, I'm ...', politeness, > naivety, in this world now where the internet is totally different, not > moral indeed. > And also, the internet is free, with such a system an internet with > different speeds might be more easily made as every user is known within a > certain time span. > > I'm currently working on a blockchain of identities ( > https://github.com/nvrrdt/onzecurrency) and I'd like to continue > developing > this, so I hope the concept has a chance to succeed in its endeavor. > > Op di 7 jun. 2022 om 10:20 schreef Nico Verrijdt <nicoverrijdt(a)gmail.com>: > > > Imho the operating systems we use aren't adequate. > > No single user is 100% accountable for what he/she does on the network. > > I'm not an expert in this field at all, but I thought about this quite a > lot figuring things out. > > Here it goes: > Suppose you implement a blockchain for identities as early in the boot > process as possible, then you find the public key of every user in the > blockchain and can communicate with every user while that user knows you > are connected to him/her. > Now you have a blockchain and can connect to virtually anyone. > But the operating system is still vulnerable to hijacking and you should > verify correctness somehow. Suppose, I'm really not sure if this > effectively works, you implement a hashing function as early as possible in > the compiler, then you can hash the code of the compiler and verify if the > compiler's code changed. Then up to the operating system which you compile > with that compiler and hash the code in its development stages. Now you're > able to connect other users in the network and compare hashes of comparable > computer systems. Maybe there are better alternatives. What happens in > memory is a black box to me, somehow I like to hash and compare that too, > and I understand that our computers become quite a lot slower. > > Privacy issues do arise with this system, but it's nothing more than in > real life where you meet someone and say 'Hi, I'm ...', politeness, > naivety, in this world now where the internet is totally different, not > moral indeed. > And also, the internet is free, with such a system an internet with > different speeds might be more easily made as every user is known within a > certain time span. > > I'm currently working on a blockchain of identities ( > https://github.com/nvrrdt/onzecurrency) and I'd like to continue > developing this, so I hope the concept has a chance to succeed in its > endeavor. > > Op di 7 jun. 2022 om 09:22 schreef Karl Semich <0xloem(a)gmail.com>: > > > Cypherpunks, Anarchists, and Security Professionals can agree on > something. Something we have agreed on for a long time, but fought > viciously over. > > We need uses of computer networks to be moral. > > Our communities have been attacked for quite some time now. > > > > >

2 5

EXCLUSIVE: Crypto Traders Say Coinbase Refusing To Return Wrongly Deposited Funds Despite Having Access
by jim bell 11 Jun '22

11 Jun '22

EXCLUSIVE: Crypto Traders Say Coinbase Refusing To Return Wrongly Deposited Funds Despite Having Access https://share.newsbreak.com/19g5kr7n

1 0

[ot][crazy] Theories of Mind Control: Repeated Short-term Reward
by Undiscussed Horrific Abuse, One Victim of Many 11 Jun '22

11 Jun '22

Today's xkcd showed the author has mysterious difficulty exercising, even as he gets better at it. I was thinking of the various mainstream mind controls, and how that might develop in both him and me. A constant feedback pattern is of people checking e.g. their mobile devices for e.g. their email, texts, or whatever. This pattern has been developing since the 90s. My understanding is that most people check for updates more frequently than is necessary, even if there is generally nothing new, and then portals like facebook or youtube can capitalize on that by introducing influence content. I'm thinking of a sense of satisfaction or reward developing in the mind, and that encouraging habit formation and preference building, to repeat the behavior. When this happens, it's not including reasons: it's feeling-based. If there are rational reasons, they are heavily weighted by the feelings present and the environment of being mostly exposed to the same influences. So instincts we have, like to run around outdoors, have to do their thing in context of that continuous reinforcement. As we go throughout the day, or minds go through different states. We process different things around us; we daydream, brainstorm, plan, or pursue goals; we're at different points in our biological cycles, getting hungry, tired, aroused, etc. So each time these feedback loops of checking messages reinforce in some way, they are doing so in exposure to different things in the mind and body. And they're' doing so without solid logical reasons, which could make it hard for the mind to know which parts are relevant to the reinforcement. The theory then, is that as different parts of mind activate during reinforcement, the reinforcement slowly spreads to those different parts, as it happens during their activity. All the different parts of our cycles start deciding it's helpful to check for updates on our phone -- or the habits of checking for updates, gain footholds in these parts, reducing the cognitive events during the normal human parts that support those normal human parts on their own. I imagine the behavior slowly spreading through the brain, like an arm of the corporation running the product it's associated with. They can stimulate more and more of the human brain by simply delivering an email or showing a meme, the longer the human uses them. And it becomes harder and harder to do other things. This specific theory may be less relevant nowadays as influence has gotten much craftier than simply the reward of getting an email from a friend, but it seems still relevant.

1 0

Microsoft could finally kill HDD boot drives for good
by jim bell 11 Jun '22

11 Jun '22

Microsoft could finally kill HDD boot drives for good https://share.newsbreak.com/192x4v8n

5 5