- cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

Blackflag Tupameros
by professor rat 25 May '23

25 May '23

AK new title: Book Launch: Anarchist Popular Power – Dissident Labor and Armed Struggle in Uruguay 1956-76 We are excited to announce the launch event for Troy Andreas Araiza Kokinis’ new book ‘Anarchist Popular Power: Dissident Labor and Armed Struggle in Uruguay 1956-76’ Crypto for the people - power to the node!

1 0

MUSK Vs Strong AI on second amendment rights
by professor rat 25 May '23

25 May '23

Elon Musk has suggested Strong AI could disarm law-abiding American citizens. Reminds me of Dana for some reason . . . https://www.facebook.com/NRA/videos/dana-loesch-freedoms-safest-place/17465… Reposts from my own cold dead hands

1 0

Musk Hosting DeSantis Signals Starker Partisanship on Twitter
by professor rat 25 May '23

25 May '23

Musk Hosting DeSantis could be a match made in Heaven. Professor Rat - about an hour ago organizing a totally effective and non-humiliating campaign launch for their boss with tech genius @elonmusk . Bravo! Remember, their pitch is ‘Trump but competent.’ Lol. << Nazi flag-carrying teen crashes truck into barrier near White House - but enough about Starlink . . . Professor Rat - 4 days ago Bitcoins Miami conflab was a blast despite the sky briefly turning black with the bodies of Thiels Kept-Men. Attendee’s got to reveal thier inner rainbow unicorn lovey selves through L2 and so on. The Maxi neanderthal were routed to the nearest Cluckin’ Bell. I’m told Los Pollos Hermanos also did a roaring trade. Good Times! https://sysad.org/stream Reposts trump buttplugs - chickenmen get plucked

1 0

JPMorgan Chase and Jeffrey Epstein Were Both Involved in a Strange Offshore Company Called Liquid Funding
by professor rat 25 May '23

25 May '23

Very interesting G - thank you. In broadly related news Assmange-supporter, Adman Backstabber runs a ' LIQUID " sidechain of Big God - those two could be the Jamie and Jeffrey of Cryptoanarchy. If we're foolish enough to let them go on breathing.

1 0

Fwd: Financial Disclosure Records Request
by Gunnar Larson 24 May '23

24 May '23

---------- Forwarded message --------- From: ethics.sm.records <records(a)ethics.ny.gov> Date: Wed, May 24, 2023, 12:08 PM Subject: RE: Financial Disclosure Records Request To: Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> Mr. Larson – Adrienne Harris received an extension of time to file the FDS; it is now due on June 19, 2023. Richard Weber left service in November 2022 and was not required to file an FDS this year. Sincerely, RECORDS ACCESS OFFICER *From:* Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> *Sent:* Monday, May 22, 2023 8:38 AM *To:* ethics.sm.records <records(a)ethics.ny.gov> *Subject:* Re: Financial Disclosure Records Request *ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails.* Hello there: Are you able to send disclosure forms for NY-DFS: Adrienne Harris (2022) Richard Weber (2022) Thank you, Gunnar Larson xNY.io - Bank.org 917-580-8053 On Wed, Apr 26, 2023, 9:04 AM ethics.sm.records <records(a)ethics.ny.gov> wrote: Attached please see the 2021 Financial Disclosure Statement of Peter Dean. We have calendared your additional requests. Sincerely, Records Access Officer NYS Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government 540 Broadway Albany, NY 12207 (518) 408-3976 records(a)ethics.ny.gov <records(a)jcope.ny.gov> *From:* Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 25, 2023 2:06 PM *To:* ethics.sm.records <records(a)ethics.ny.gov> *Subject:* Re: Financial Disclosure Records Request *ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails.* Thank you. Can you please put our May 15, 2023 request for the 2022 records on your calendar? Meanwhile, yes, please send Peter Dean's 2021 record. On Tue, Apr 25, 2023, 1:35 PM ethics.sm.records <records(a)ethics.ny.gov> wrote: Gunnar – the 2022 Financial Disclosure Statement is due to be filed by May 15, 2023. They will become publicly available shortly thereafter. I can get for you the 2021 Statement of Peter Dean but 2022 Statements at this time. Sincerely, Records Access Officer NYS Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government 540 Broadway Albany, NY 12207 (518) 408-3976 records(a)ethics.ny.gov <records(a)jcope.ny.gov> *From:* Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 25, 2023 1:23 PM *To:* ethics.sm.records <records(a)ethics.ny.gov> *Subject:* Re: Financial Disclosure Records Request *ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails.* Records Access Officer: We are looking for the recent 2022 Financial Disclosure Forms for the Governor and Attorney General. Do you know when those will be available? For the individuals at DFS, we are looking for the 2022 Financial Disclosure Forms for: Adrienne Harris (2022) Richard Weber (2022) Peter Dean (2021, 2022) Thank you, Gunnar On Tue, Apr 25, 2023, 1:04 PM ethics.sm.records <records(a)ethics.ny.gov> wrote: Mr. Larson – the Financial Disclosure Statements of the Governor and the Attorney General are posted on the Commission’s website here: https://ethics.ny.gov/financial-disclosure-statements-elected-officials?f%5… For the Superintendent of the Department of Financial Services; and the previous and current General Counsel at the Department of Financial Services, please provide the individuals’ names and specify which years of records you are seeking. Sincerely, Records Access Officer NYS Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government 540 Broadway Albany, NY 12207 (518) 408-3976 records(a)ethics.ny.gov <records(a)jcope.ny.gov> *From:* Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 25, 2023 12:54 PM *To:* ethics.sm.records <records(a)ethics.ny.gov> *Subject:* Financial Disclosure Records Request *ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails.* Dear Madam or Sir: I would kindly like to request a batch of financial disclosure records for the following: Governor, New York State Superintendent, Department of Financial Services General Counsel, Department of Financial Services (two forms, for previous and current individuals) Attorney General, New York State Thank you very much, Gunnar Gunnar Larson xNY.io - Bank.org 917-580-8053

1 0

Supreme Court’s Approval Rating Slides as Clarence Thomas Faces Ethics Controversies
by Gunnar Larson 24 May '23

24 May '23

Public confidence in the US Supreme Court slid amid a flurry of ethics controversies, including revelations that Justice Clarence Thomas got luxury vacations and other benefits from a Republican megadonor, according to a new Marquette Law School Poll. Supreme Court’s Approval Rating Slides as Clarence Thomas Faces Ethics Controversies https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-05-24/supreme-court-approval-s…

1 0

Musk Hosting DeSantis Signals Starker Partisanship on Twitter
by Gunnar Larson 24 May '23

24 May '23

Elon Musk’s plan to host Ron DeSantis’ 2024 presidential campaign announcement on Twitter will mean promotion of the live audio event to the billionaire’s more than 140 million followers on the platform he owns, underscoring the social network’s shift toward a more partisan approach to political discourse. Musk Hosting DeSantis Signals Starker Partisanship on Twitter https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-05-23/musk-s-hosting-desantis-…

1 0

JPMorgan Chase and Jeffrey Epstein Were Both Involved in a Strange Offshore Company Called Liquid Funding
by Gunnar Larson 24 May '23

24 May '23

https://wallstreetonparade.com/2023/05/jpmorgan-chase-and-jeffrey-epstein-w… By Pam Martens and Russ Martens: May 24, 2023 ~ Jamie Dimon Being Sworn In at House Financial Services Committee Hearing, May 27, 2021 Jamie Dimon Being Sworn In at House Financial Services Committee Hearing, May 27, 2021 This Friday and Saturday, JPMorgan Chase’s Chairman and CEO, Jamie Dimon, is scheduled to sit for some very uncomfortable questioning in a deposition concerning what role he played in allowing his bank to serve as a vast cash conduit for Jeffrey Epstein, which enabled Epstein to perpetuate his sex trafficking of underage girls. The Attorney General’s office of the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) has filed a federal lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase that makes devastating charges against the largest bank in the United States. It alleges that JPMorgan Chase sat on a mountain of evidence that Jeffrey Epstein was running a child sex trafficking ring as it continued to keep him as a client; accept his lucrative referrals of wealthy clients; and provided him with large sums of cash and wire transfers to pay off victims – one of whom was a “14-year old sex slave.” The case is USVI v JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. (22-cv-10904) in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Epstein was found dead in his jail cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan on August 10, 2019. His death was ruled a suicide by the New York City Medical Examiner. The lawsuit contains deeply disturbing new information about a former top JPMorgan Chase bank executive’s close personal relationship with Epstein. The lawsuit reveals that Jes Staley, the head of JPMorgan’s Private Bank at the time, “exchanged approximately 1,200 emails with Epstein from his JP Morgan email account.” Several of the emails contained photos of young women in seductive poses and others further “suggest that Staley may have been involved in Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation.” For example, the lawsuit states the following: “In July 2010, Staley emailed Epstein saying ‘That was fun. Say hi to Snow White[,]’ to which Epstein responded ‘[W]hat character would you like next?’ and Staley said ‘Beauty and the Beast.’ ” There were other giant red flags which the bank chose to ignore as it maintained Epstein’s accounts. The complaint reveals the following: “Between 2003 and 2013, Epstein and/or his associates used Epstein’s accounts to make numerous payments to individual women and related companies. Among the recipients of these payments were numerous women with Eastern European surnames who were publicly and internally identified as Epstein recruiters and/or victims. For example, Epstein paid more than $600,0000 to Jane Doe 1, a woman who—according to news reports contained in JP Morgan’s due diligence reports—Epstein purchased [as a sex slave] at the age of 14. Like other women who received payments from Epstein, Jane Doe 1 listed Epstein’s apartments on 66th Street in New York City as her address, which should have been a red flag to JP Morgan. “Epstein and/or his associates also made significant cash withdrawals and 95 foreign remittances with no known payee. For example, Hyperion Air, Inc.—the Epstein-controlled company that owned Epstein’s private jet—issued over $547,000 in checks payable to cash purportedly for ‘fuel expenses when traveling to foreign countries.’ Additionally, between January 2012 and June 2013, Hyperion converted more than $120,000 into foreign currency. Many of these cash withdrawals either exceeded the $10,000 reporting threshold or were seemingly structured to avoid triggering the reporting requirement. This is particularly significant since it is well known that Epstein paid his victims in cash.” According to the lawsuit, none of these brazen red flag transactions were reported by the bank to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) as required by law, but were characterized internally as “reasonable, normal, and expected for the type of business or industry in which the client engages.” Staley also visited Epstein while he was serving his jail time in Florida after pleading guilty in 2008 to soliciting and procuring a minor for sex. Epstein received an outrageously cozy work-release program in that matter. Staley also made numerous visits to Epstein’s private island in the Virgin Islands. JPMorgan Chase serviced Epstein’s accounts from 1998 to 2013 – a full five years after his conviction in Florida for procuring sex with a minor and his having to register as a sex offender. Jamie Dimon’s upcoming deposition in the Epstein matter has been making headlines for more than a month. But there is another tie between JPMorgan Chase and Epstein that has received scant media attention. Jeffrey Epstein presided over a $6.7 billion offshore company as its Chairman from November 9, 2001 to at least March 19, 2007, a period during which he was later accused by the U.S. Department of Justice of committing sex trafficking crimes against minors. The company is Liquid Funding Ltd. and it had two offshore connections: it was incorporated in Bermuda on October 19, 2000 by the Appleby law firm, known for setting up offshore companies in tax havens like the Isle of Man, Guernsey, Cayman Islands, and Jersey. Liquid Funding’s investment manager was Bear Stearns Bank Plc in Dublin, Ireland – a non-U.S. regulated institution, which was later merged into JPMorgan Bank Dublin. The information came to light as a result of a database created by The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists containing files leaked in 2017 from the Appleby law firm. The trove became known as the Paradise Papers. A Securities and Exchange Commission filing by Bear Stearns, prior to its collapse in 2008, indicated that Bear Stearns owned 40 percent of Liquid Funding Ltd.’s equity but the owners of the other 60 percent remain a mystery. The ratings firm, Fitch, reported in 2006 that the company had $6.7 billion in outstanding liabilities. What those liabilities consisted of and who paid them off when Bear Stearns collapsed remains largely unknown. A Moody’s report issued in 2004 revealed that JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and Natexis Banque Populaire extended Liquid Funding a $250 million liquidity facility. Deloitte was listed as its auditor. JPMorgan Chase is also listed as its “Security Trustee.” The large corporate law firm, Sidley Austin, was its legal counsel. We previously reached out to JPMorgan, Sidley Austin and Deloitte seeking information on how Epstein came to chair the company and requesting additional details. We did not receive a response from any of the three. Both Fitch and Moody’s credit rating agencies gave the medium-term notes to be issued by Liquid Funding a AAA-rating as well as gave it a AAA-rating as a counterparty. And, notably, both ratings agencies gave its commercial paper a Tier 1 rating, meaning that it could end up in money market funds purchased by average Americans seeking a low-risk, liquid investment. While the ratings agencies acknowledged that they understood the entity could issue up to $20 billion in various instruments, Fitch reported in 2006 that “Liquid Funding is capitalized with $37 million in drawn equity commitments and $63 million in undrawn equity commitments….” As a result of those top ratings on Liquid Funding’s paper, it ended up in two of JPMorgan’s money market funds, which held a total of $100 million, as well as in numerous other money market funds, including Wachovia’s Evergreen money market funds, which announced in mid-September of 2008, during the peak of the financial crisis, that it was bailing out three of its money market funds in order to keep them from breaking the buck. Wells Fargo purchased Wachovia a few weeks later. The amount of toxic debris that had parked itself in supposedly safe money market funds in 2008 led to unprecedented action by the U.S. Treasury, which had to step in with a guarantee plan after a run commenced when it was learned that the bankrupt Lehman Brothers had sold its instruments to money market funds. Bear Stearns collapsed in March of 2008 and was purchased by JPMorgan Chase. The report from the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (FCIC) detailed that the Federal Reserve Bank of New York had created a Special Purpose Vehicle called Maiden Lane LLC that used proceeds from a $28.82 billion senior loan from the New York Fed and a $1.15 billion loan from JPMorgan Chase to purchase approximately $30 billion of Bear Stearns’ toxic assets on which JPMorgan Chase wanted the Fed to bear the brunt of any losses. The FCIC report also revealed this about Bear Stearns’ accounting practices: “At the end of each quarter, Bear would lower its leverage ratio by selling assets, only to buy them back at the beginning of the next quarter. Bear and other firms booked these transactions as sales—even though the assets didn’t stay off the balance sheet for long—in order to reduce the amount of the company’s assets and lower its leverage ratio. Bear’s former treasurer [Robert] Upton called the move ‘window dressing’ and said it ensured that creditors and rating agencies were happy. Bear’s public filings reflected this, to some degree: for example, its 2007 annual report said the balance sheet was approximately 12% lower than the average month-end balance over the previous twelve months.” When the GAO report on the Fed’s bank bailouts during the financial crisis was released in 2011, it revealed that the Fed had secretly sluiced over $16 trillion in cumulative loans to both domestic and foreign banks, all linked together in a daisy chain of derivatives and off-balance-sheet toxic assets. It also showed that the Fed’s emergency bailout loans had begun in December of 2007, long before the public became aware of the banking crisis. The Fed’s emergency loans lasted until at least July 2010 according to the GAO. In addition to the publicly known support to Bear Stearns from the New York Fed, the GAO audit revealed that the Federal Reserve had provided another $853 billion in secret loans to Bear Stearns; $851 billion from its Primary Dealer Credit Facility (PDCF) and $2 billion from its Term Securities Lending Facility (TSLF). A download of the PDCF spreadsheet from the Fed shows that Bear Stearns continued to receive bailouts from the Fed until June 23, 2008. Was Liquid Funding Ltd., the entity chaired by Jeffrey Epstein, part of the Bear Stearns’ bailout by the Federal Reserve? An announcement by Moody’s rating agency on April 18, 2008 raises that suspicion. It states that “all outstanding rated liabilities” of Liquid Funding Ltd. have been “paid in full.” Moody’s explained this as follows: “…the withdrawal of the three ratings was in response to Liquid Funding’s request for withdrawal, in connection with the voluntary wind-down of Liquid Funding and following the payment and satisfaction in full of all outstanding rated liabilities of Liquid Funding. According to the Outstanding Detail Report issued by JPMorgan as of April 7, 2008 in its capacity as trustee, none of the rated debt issued under the global medium-term note program or the commercial paper note program was outstanding as of that date. Additionally, the Program Outstanding Report issued as of April 8, 2008 by the Bank of New York Mellon in its capacity as trustee showed that all transactions for which Liquid Funding was serving as counterparty have matured or been terminated.” The leaked documents from Appleby show that Liquid Funding was resurrected by JPMorgan Chase in 2011 – three years after it had purchased Bear Stearns. According to the leaked documents, Liam MacNamara became Chairman of the Board of Liquid Funding on September 27, 2011 with an address of JPMorgan Bank Dublin Plc, 1 George’s Dock, Dublin, Ireland. According to the 2011 annual report of JPMorgan Bank Dublin, Liam MacNamara was its CEO at the time. MacNamara had apparently survived the ax when JPMorgan purchased Bear Stearns in 2008, when he had been joint chief executive of Bear Stearns Bank Plc, part of Bear’s operations in Ireland, and the entity that was named investment manager for Liquid Funding. In March of 2019, the Irish Times reported that the JPMorgan Bank in Dublin “employs about 530 people” and had moved to new headquarters at 200 Capital Dock, with “the capacity to accommodate 1,100 workers.” The newspaper noted that Jamie Dimon was scheduled to officiate at the grand opening of the new headquarters. The bank is now called J.P. Morgan Bank (Ireland) Plc. JPMorgan Bank (Ireland) has roots dating back to 1919 and merged Bear Stearns Bank Plc in Ireland into JPMorgan Bank (Ireland). JPMorgan Chase bragged on its website in 2019 that the bank “is the only EU passported bank in the non-bank chain of J.P. Morgan and provides the firm with direct access to the European Central Bank repo window.” In June 2019, the Central Bank of Ireland fined a unit of JPMorgan Bank (Ireland) $1.8 million for myriad violations, including “failure to have adequate control systems.” Of course, when a bank has already received an unprecedented five criminal felony counts (to which it admitted guilt) from the U.S. Department of Justice, a $1.8 million fine is little more than a mild slap on the wrist.

1 0

NYC faces restraining order from town refusing to accept buses of migrants: 'Utter lack of leadership' | Fox News
by Gunnar Larson 24 May '23

24 May '23

What does the United Nations do in New York anyway? ---- https://www.foxnews.com/media/nyc-faces-restraining-order-town-refusing-acc…

1 0

The Fed Has a New Scandal on Its Hands: Colluding with Central Banks to Rig Libor; Evidence Is Being Tweeted Out
by Gunnar Larson 23 May '23

23 May '23

https://wallstreetonparade.com/2023/05/the-fed-has-a-new-scandal-on-its-han… By Pam Martens and Russ Martens: May 23, 2023 ~ Andy Verity's Book, RiggedThe Fed has been under non-stop scandals for the past two years. It pumped out trillions of dollars in repo loans to Wall Street’s casino banks beginning on September 17, 2019 and then made up a hokey excuse to cover up its massive bailout of banks it is incompetent to supervise. After former Dallas Fed President, Robert Kaplan, was caught trading like a hedge fund kingpin while sitting on confidential Fed information, the Fed’s Board of Governors had the audacity to refer the matter to its own Inspector General, who reports to the Fed’s Board of Governors and can be fired by it. Not surprisingly, 19 months later there’s still no word on this investigation. Then there was the President of the St. Louis Fed, James Bullard, who was caught giving a private meeting with Citigroup clients. The New York Fed has been allowed to quietly set up a second trading floor for itself near the S&P 500 futures markets in Chicago. Senator Elizabeth Warren has correctly sized up the current state of affairs at the Fed as “a culture of corruption.” The latest scandal comes courtesy of BBC correspondent Andy Verity’s new book Rigged: The Incredible True Story of the Whistleblowers Jailed after Exposing the Rotten Heart of the Financial System. The book won’t be released until June 1 but it is already being serialized in the Times U.K. newspaper and causing a major stir. After just one day of media buzz, news of the central bank plot has gone viral and there have already been calls for investigations by Parliament. The central allegation of Verity’s book is that the Fed, the Bank of England (BOE), the European Central Bank (ECB), and other national central banks in Europe, orchestrated a conspiracy during the financial crisis in 2008 to rig the interest rate benchmark known as LIBOR. As part of that conspiracy, Verity claims that central banks secretly bullied the mega banks on both sides of the pond to lower their LIBOR submissions to artificially deflate interest rates. LIBOR is the interest rate that determines what banks pay to borrow on a short-term basis from one another. Because of rigging scandals, it is being phased out and will be replaced by the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR). What is not in dispute, as Americans now know thanks to an audit by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) that was released in 2011, is that the Fed was secretly pumping a cumulative $16 trillion in below-market rate loans from December 2007 to at least July of 2010 to prop up the same global banks that were making these LIBOR submissions. If one of these mega banks made LIBOR submissions showing it was paying a much higher interest rate to borrow than other comparable banks, it would be a signal to the market that the bank was in trouble, sending its stock price plunging and making it necessary for the Fed to sluice trillions more in loans to the bank or watch it collapse. Because these mega banks were, and still are, heavily interconnected with trillions of notional dollars in derivatives, when one mega bank starts to teeter it sets off a chain reaction of contagion throughout the mega banks. During and after the 2008 financial crisis, the largest borrower from the Fed under its emergency loan programs was the teetering Citigroup. It received more than $2.5 trillion in secret, cumulative loans from the Fed according to the GAO audit. The Fed battled in Federal courts for more than two years attempting to keep the names of the banks and the dollar amount of their loans secret from the U.S. media and the public. Verity is helping move his book into the realm of bestsellers by Tweeting out titillating tidbits of evidence daily to support his claims. Before the sun came up in New York this morning, Verity had Tweeted out a link to a November 19, 2010 interview of Barclays’ trader, Peter Johnson, by two FBI agents, three investigators from the U.S. Department of Justice, three officials from the Securities and Exchange Commission and other U.S. and U.K. regulators. At line 257 on page 221 of the transcript, FBI agent Michael Kelly says this: “If we go to the first exchange here, Mr. Dearlove, [Johnson’s supervisor at Barclays] at the bottom of his first statement says ‘the bottom line is…you’re going to absolutely hate this and I’ve spoken to Spence about it as well, but we’ve had some very serious pressure from the UK government and the Bank of England about pushing our LIBORs lower.’ You’ve mentioned the Bank of England already, there is reference here to the UK government.” Johnson goes on to explain that it is his understanding that the Bank of England and the UK government were pressuring top management at Barclays to push down its LIBOR submissions. The promo for Rigged says it “picks up where The Big Short leaves off.” The Big Short was the Michael Lewis bestseller that got a Hollywood treatment. It made a handful of short sellers on Wall Street famous while revealing a different “rotten heart of the financial system” – the rigged subprime market that drove housing in the U.S. into the worst collapse since the Great Depression. A far more accurate description of Verity’s new book would be that it picks up where Nomi Prins’ 2018 book, Collusion: How Central Bankers Rigged the World leaves off. Prins comes right out and charges in the book that “G7 central bank collusion was the new black.” Prins describes the early colluding actions as follows: “According to an October 8 [2008] Fed statement released at seven in the morning, several central banks (Bank of England, Fed, European Central Bank, Sveriges Riksbank, Swiss National Bank, Bank of Canada, and Bank of Japan) announced they had ‘cooperated in unprecedented joint actions such as the provision of liquidity to reduce strains in financial markets.’ They would collude to cut rates together. It was planned and executed that way. The Fed opened the moves and cut rates by 50 basis points to 1.5 percent. “Trichet [then President of the European Central Bank] realized that he would have to succumb to collusive forces. The ECB cut rates the same day, by half a percentage point to 3.75 percent. The minimum rate on main refinancing operations of the euro system fell to 3.75 percent, on the marginal lending facility to 4.75 percent, and on its deposit facility to 2.75 percent… “Tricet’s ECB opted for another 50-basis-point benchmark rate cut to 3.25 percent on November 6. The same day, the BOE slashed its rate in one fell swoop by 1.5 percentage points, or 150 basis points, to reach 3 percent, the lowest level since 1954.” Nomi Prins Takes on Colluding Central Banks in New Book We asked Prins for her thoughts on the new information from Verity. She responded: “Given the current information coming to light, central banks colluding with each other, or with major private banks to ensure all avenues of rates were tempered, is part of this overall playbook of power reach and crisis and liquidity reactions.” Ben Bernanke was the Chairman of the Fed during this unprecedented collusion. (See our 2014 report: Fed Chair Bernanke Held 84 Secret Meetings in the Lead Up to the Wall Street Collapse.) Bernanke doesn’t fare well in Prins’ book. The author writes that “Bernanke was such a master of collusion that he made it appear as if the colluders didn’t include him but were somehow acting completely independently of the Fed’s policies and implicit or explicit directives.” In another passage, Prins writes that Bernanke “was the consummate magician. He provided the illusion of competence in his orchestration of global monetary policy collusion – so long as no one looked behind the curtain.” Verity also profiled his book at the BBC yesterday. In his article, Verity reveals a smoking gun involving the poster boys for crony capitalism: JPMorgan Chase and the New York Fed. (See our report: These Are the Banks that Own the New York Fed and Its Money Button.) Verity shares this about that 2010 FBI interview with Johnson, the trader from Barclays: “Mr Johnson also pointed investigators to a below-market offer in the dollar LIBOR market in New York made by JPMorgan Chase in late October 2008. “Interviewing him in November 2010, the US regulator confirmed it had seen data that Chase New York had offered to lend at 4.68% — while putting in a LIBOR estimate of the cost of borrowing dollars that was much lower — at 3.25%. “Mr Johnson said he believed the offer to lend at a rate still far below the market, mid-crisis, when other lenders were refusing to lend any cash, was done at the urging of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.” In yesterday’s article at the BBC, Verity seems very sympathetic to those 37 traders that were prosecuted for rigging LIBOR. He appears to believe that the traders were innocent because the central banks were also rigging LIBOR. We’ve yet to see his evidence in that regard, but we are acutely aware that in some cases there was substantial evidence showing that the traders were rigging rates to benefit their own or the firm’s trading positions, thus helping their own bonuses and profits for their bank. In other words, two agendas were simultaneously taking place: the central banks had an agenda to preempt mega banks collapsing by artificially pushing down LIBOR rates and, at least some traders, were motivated by greed. In the case of UBS and Citigroup trader, Tom Hayes, who was prosecuted and served five years in prison, there was a boatload of evidence that he was moving rates to benefit his and his firm’s trading positions – not because he was pressured to push rates down to appease a central bank. In fact, in some cases, he was pushing rates up, not down. As we previously reported: The Tom Hayes case is a textbook example of how to bring a market rigging case. The Justice Department prosecutors had reams of chat room messages where Hayes requested other traders to move Libor in a specific direction in order to make profits for himself and UBS, the global bank where he worked. The unit of UBS that was involved, UBS Japan, pled guilty to felony wire fraud and admitted its role in manipulating Libor. UBS paid more than $1.5 billion to settle the charges with prosecutors and regulators in the U.S., the U.K. and Switzerland. UBS is represented by legions of lawyers from the most prestigious law firms around the world. Does anyone really think it paid $1.5 billion when its traders did nothing wrong? On December 19, 2012, when the Justice Department first unsealed its criminal complaint against Hayes and Roger Darin, another UBS trader, it explained the case as follows: “Beginning in September 2006, UBS Japan and Hayes orchestrated a sustained, wide-ranging and systematic scheme to move Yen LIBOR in a direction favorable to Hayes’ trading positions, defrauding UBS’ counterparties and harming others with financial products referencing Yen LIBOR who were unaware of the manipulation. Between November 2006 and August 2009, Hayes or one of his colleagues endeavored to manipulate Yen LIBOR on at least 335 of the 738 trading days in that period, and during some periods on almost a daily basis. Because of the large size of Hayes’ trading positions, even slight moves of a fraction of a percent in Yen LIBOR could generate large profits. For example, Hayes once estimated that a 0.01 percent movement in the final Yen LIBOR fixing on a specific date could result in a $2 million profit for UBS. “According to the charging documents, UBS Japan and Hayes employed three strategies to execute the scheme: from November 2006 through September 2009, Hayes conspired with Darin and others within UBS to cause the bank to make false and misleading Yen LIBOR submissions to the BBA [British Bankers Association]; also, Hayes caused cash brokerage firms, which purported to provide market information regarding LIBOR to panel banks, to disseminate false and misleading information about short-term interest rates for Yen, which those banks could and did rely upon in formulating their own LIBOR submissions to the BBA; and Hayes communicated with interest rate derivatives traders employed at three other Yen LIBOR panel banks in an effort to cause them to make false and misleading Yen LIBOR submissions to the BBA. “As alleged in the charging documents, Hayes, Darin and other co-conspirators often executed their scheme through electronic chats. On Nov. 20, 2006, for example, Hayes asked a UBS Yen LIBOR submitter who was substituting for Darin, ‘hi . . . [Darin] and I generally coordinate ie sometimes trade if ity [sic] suits, otherwise skew the libors a bit.’ Hayes went on to request, ‘really need high 6m [6-month] fixes till Thursday.’ The submitter responded, ‘yep we on the case there . . . will def[initely] be on the high side.’ The day before this request, UBS’s 6-month Yen LIBOR submission had been tied with the lowest submissions included in the calculation of the LIBOR fix. Immediately after this request for high submissions, however, UBS’s 6-monthYen LIBOR submissions rose to the highest submission of any bank in the contributor panel and remained tied for the highest, precisely as Hayes had requested. “Another example of such an alleged accommodation occurred on March 29, 2007, when Hayes asked Darin, ‘can we go low 3[month] and 6[month] pls? . . . 3[month] esp.’ Darin responded ‘ok’, and the two had the following exchange: Hayes: what are we going to set? Darin: too early to say yet . . . prob[ably] .69 would be our unbiased contribution Hayes: ok wd really help if we cld keep 3m low pls Darin: as i said before – i [don’t] mind helping on your fixings, but i’m not setting libor 7bp away from the truth. . . i’ll get ubs banned if i do that, no interest in that. Hayes: ok obviousl;y [sic] no int[erest] in that happening either . . . not asking for it to be 7bp from reality anyway any help appreciated[.] Hayes received the help he requested. “In addition, the criminal complaint charges Hayes with colluding with a trader employed at another LIBOR panel bank in May 2009, in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. Hayes allegedly engaged in the collusive scheme to fix the price of derivative instruments whose price was based on Yen LIBOR. In electronic chats, Hayes asked the trader to move 6-month Yen LIBOR up due to a ‘gigantic’ position Hayes had taken. For the trade in question, UBS trading records confirmed that each 0.01 percent movement in LIBOR would generate profits of approximately $459,000 for Hayes’ book. The trader at the other bank responded that he would comply, and his bank’s submission moved by 0.06 percent compared to its submission the previous day, for which Hayes thanked him.”

1 0