November 2021 - cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

Funny Non-Fungible-Token thread
by professor rat 12 Nov '21

12 Nov '21

There’s a kind of libertarian utopianism at work in the whole digital currency market. It’s sort of like everyone preparing for a post-apocalyptic world where banks and governments no-longer exist, but the internet does, only there’s no longer any central servers, just a bunch of wi-fi hot-spots, so you have to pay for things by transferring a cryptographic “object” from your phone to someone else’s phone without having that transaction go through a bank. It will be sort of like technological “mad max”. FROM https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2021/11/explaining-nfts.h…

1 0

NFT's for Dummies
by professor rat 12 Nov '21

12 Nov '21

NFTs don’t just provide a kind of digital “deed.” Because blockchains are programmable, it’s possible to endow NFTs with features that enable them to expand their purpose over time, or even to provide direct utility to their holders. In other words, NFTs can do things — or let their owners do things — in both digital spaces and the physical world. https://hbr.org/2021/11/how-nfts-create-value Avax programs in Solidity - Sol in Rust - Btc in Cobol, etc

1 0

Re: Defragging Crypto
by professor rat 12 Nov '21

12 Nov '21

> While too much is being asked of the term " Crypto ", its politics are > becoming more of an issue since its economic reach and power keeps > rapidly increasing. Which reach or power, precisely? I don't think it has much, even now. -- Sampo Syreeni, . . " How sweet - to be an idiot.

1 0

Re: cyber-libertarians or crypto-anarchists
by professor rat 12 Nov '21

12 Nov '21

Any second-generation cypherpunk eunuch we may tersely define as a no-coiner An " Uncle Sampo "?

1 0

Re: 1984: Thread
by professor rat 12 Nov '21

12 Nov '21

Where extremely dumb fuck Sampo Syreeni submits to the malevolent Cointelpro gossip of wannabe FBI informant, Batshit Crazy > Zuck: People just submitted it. > Zuck: I don't know why. > Zuck: They "trust me" > Zuck: Dumb fucks Isn't that the very definition of people communicating with each other? I mean, that's how we tend to do it. Malevolent gossip, and whatnot. -- Sampo Syreeni, aka decoy - decoy(a)iki.fi, http://decoy.iki.fi/front +358-40-3751464, 025E D175 ABE5 027C 9494 EEB0 E090 8BA9 0509 85C2

1 0

APster Vs Zuckerberg
by professor rat 12 Nov '21

12 Nov '21

If list Dumbells ever decide to get off their fat eunuch arse and do something about Fedbook, the means to do so now exist. https://stiffs.com/celebrity/markzuckerberg This works in practice - even if it will never work in Jim Dumbells moronic " AP system " BTW we may all be grateful celebrity journalists no longer scribble ' the first draft of history ' since none of them have ever read up on soft-drill APster.

1 0

Web 3, a generic term for a blockchain-based alternative where users can own their data
by professor rat 11 Nov '21

11 Nov '21

Outside of legal challenges to monopolistic internet giants, crypto presents the best way to counteract “surveillance capitalism.” https://www.coindesk.com/business/2021/11/11/probably-nothing-why-people-st…

1 0

Helium aims to build a decentralized, global wireless net using open-source tech
by professor rat 11 Nov '21

11 Nov '21

Help others - help yourself https://dailyhodl.com/2021/11/11/altcoin-protocol-targeting-wireless-revolu… Hope for the helpless - everythings going up!

1 0

SOL stepping up?
by professor rat 11 Nov '21

11 Nov '21

SOL appears to be moving away from peaceful-coexistence towards global anarchist revolution. THIS COULD CHANGE - remember that cypherpunk-revolutionary that turned into a pussy journalist overnite, whassisname. https://cointelegraph.com/news/platform-aims-to-address-privacy-concerns-in…

1 0

Cryptocurrency: When Free Markets? 4k Years to DeFi...
by grarpamp 11 Nov '21

11 Nov '21

Crypto DeFi... the last remaining peaceful path to Free Markets. 4,000+ years later and they still haven’t figured it out https://www.sovereignman.com/trends/4000-years-later-and-they-still-havent-… More than four thousand years ago around 2112 BC, King Ur-Nammu of ancient Sumeria gathered his scribes together to dictate a series of royal decrees, all of which were chiseled onto cuneiform tablets. A handful of these tablets were discovered and translated in the 20th century, making the Code of Ur-Nammu the oldest known set of laws in the world. While most of the King’s laws dealt with criminal matters (i.e. requiring the death penalty for both murder and robbery), some of the rules were actually a very early form of price controls. Hundreds of years later, King Hammurabi of Babylon created his own set of laws, known to history as the Code of Hammurabi. And while his code is famously known for its principle of ‘an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth’, much of Hammurabi’s code also fixed wages, prices, finance, and commerce. For example, the King decreed that any man who defaults on his debts could pay off his creditors by subjecting his wife, son, or daughter to forced labor for three years… regardless of the size of the loan. Hammurabi also fixed the price of wholesale grain storage, shipping, divorce, livestock, and even drinks at the local tavern. There are also several sections devoted to wage controls; Hammurabi saw fit, for example, that a home builder be paid a certain fee that depended only on the size of the house. Similarly, occupations ranging from farm laborers, ox drivers, shipbuilders, herdsmen, skilled artisans, etc. all had their wages fixed by the Code. There is also strong historical evidence of price controls in ancient Egypt. The ancient Indian philosopher Vishnugupta’s advised kings to not only fix prices, but fix the maximum profit for traders and businesses. And the Roman Emperor Diocletian’s infamous Edict on Wages and Prices in the early 300s AD was a complete disaster. Wage controls, price controls, financial controls, and commercial controls have been vainly imposed by governments for thousands of years. We’ve learned from history that they simply do not work. And yet, rather insanely, politicians keep trying these same tactics over and over again, expecting a different result. Recently I was visited by a close friend of mine from Argentina who often tells me the grim economic tales of his home country. Argentina is in a perennial state of economic chaos; like Venezuela, it went from being one of the most prosperous countries in the world in the 20th century, to one of the most chaotic. They’ve confiscated assets, imposed wealth taxes, defaulted on their debt, banned exports, and utterly destroyed their currency. In local currency terms, inflation in Argentina is 50%… though no one in their right minds actually holds their savings in Argentine pesos. Inflation is now so bad in Argentina that the government recently imposed a set of price controls. And my friend informed me that a number of producers, especially in the agricultural sector, have stopped delivering because the government’s price mandate is below their cost of production. Last but not least, my friend told me that Argentina’s government is also planning to forbid businesses from laying off workers. Even when a company cannot afford to keep employees because the economic situation is so pitiful, they somehow have to keep paying workers with money they don’t have. It’s like that old Soviet adage– “we pretend to work, they pretend to pay us.” These types of measures would almost be comical if they didn’t cause such widespread suffering. And yet even rich, advanced nations are susceptible to this way of thinking. In fact we’ve seen so much of it over the past 18 months, disguised as public health protocols. They spent hundreds of billions of dollars to give businesses free “PPP” loans so that workers could continue to be paid to NOT work. Then the government simply took on that responsibility themselves, paying people directly to stay home and NOT work. Now they’re trying to force businesses to fire tens of millions of people, even in critical sectors like healthcare and transportation, because of their vaccine status. Each of these measures is a way for the government to direct the supply and free flow of labor. In other words, they’re essentially wage controls. We’ve also seen endless examples of other controls. They forced certain places to close (churches, bars) but allowed others to operate (liquor stores, marijuana dispensaries, social justice riots). They unilaterally suspended evictions and foreclosures, creating incentives for people to stop paying rent/interest. And through the central bank, they’ve pumped hundreds of billions of dollars into financial markets, inflating stocks, bonds, housing, etc. to essentially create asset price controls. The specific tactics are different. But conceptually, this idea of imposing extreme control over economic resources is quite similar to what Argentina has been doing… and what Hammurabi, Ur-Nammu, and Diocletian tried thousands of years ago. This isn’t rocket science, it’s basic high school economics. Price controls don’t work. Central planning doesn’t work. There’s a reason the Soviet Union doesn’t exist anymore. Price controls create shortages and inefficiencies. Everyone loses. Inflation and supply chain dysfunction didn’t happen by accident. They’re the result of fanatical crusaders who never bothered to perform an objective cost/benefit analysis of their wage, price, and commercial controls. And the more these people try to save the world, the more likely they are to keep wrecking it.

1 0