- cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

test 1a
by Anonymous Remailer (austria) 19 Jan '14

19 Jan '14

this is a test of remailer white listing

1 0

"the ability of the government to go back to taps collected years earlier to look for material with which to influence potential witnesses in the present"
by coderman 19 Jan '14

19 Jan '14

see also: http://www.reddit.com/user/ellsbergd from thread: http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/1vahsi/i_am_pentagon_papers_leaker_da… --- PulvisEtUmbraSumus When did you first become aware that there had been an attempt to seize your medical files from Lewis Fielding's office, and what was your reaction to the administration going that far? In general, how aware were you of surveillance and character assassination attempts against your person, such as the attempts to tie you to communist groups in Minnesota as per this conversation between Nixon and John Mitchell? --- ellsbergd WOW! That link is absolutely fascinating! (Even though I don't have the time just now to go through it in detail, as I will shortly). Thank you for the link! I have to ask, where is it from, where did you get it (on the White House transcripts)? Well, in answer to your question, I just became aware of some surveillance on me (BEFORE the Pentagon papers came out) ten minutes ago, from your link. I was being surveilled because I was a witness in a criminal trial of draft resisters, some of the Minnesota Eight. Their very good lawyer has been accused, I don't know on what basis, of having been a Communist. And that allegation was not of particular significance to the DOJ UNTIL, months later, he was associated with me, after the Papers came out. Likewise, the president is heard discussing with Haldeman on these transcripts the need to go back over earlier (illegal, warrantless) wiretaps--of journalists and White House officials, on which I was overheard--to see what might look significant now, in light of the release of the Pentagon Papers. That's what I've been talking about in earlier answers: the ability of the government to go back to taps collected years earlier to look for material with which to influence potential witnesses in the present. (See their interest in the allegation that the wife of one journalist may have been accused of shoplifting in her past). So people who have "nothing to hide" should ask themselves if that is equally true of their spouses or children, or neighbors, who could possibly be turned into informants by threat of their private lives being revealed. (The Cuban CIA assets who burglarized my psychoanalyst's office were interested in my children and wife as much as me, a reporter who interviewed them was told; they had been told of the precedent of Alger Hiss' step-son who was crucially deterred, at Hiss' insistence, from testifying in his defense at his trial on a crucial point, because he would have been questioned about his alleged homosexuality). My analyst later apologized to me for not telling me about the break-in--which he was sure was aimed at me, by the White House--because his lawyer had advised him not to "get involved." So I didn't know about it until it came out in my courtroom, thanks to John Dean's revelation. All for the best. If he had told me and we had raised it in the court-room, the plumbers would not have been kept on the White House payroll (via CREEP) and would not have been ordered into the Watergate. Nixon would have stayed in office, and the war would have continued for years.

1 2

Updates on the Death Prediction Lottery.
by David - 19 Jan '14

19 Jan '14

Some updates to DPL. 1) I have added a lot of names, mainly FISA court members and people from intelligence agencies. 2) I have decided not to have multiple pools but to have every name in the same death pool. Most names qualify for 75% of the pool funds, a few for 100%. The list is not complete yet, and I would consider any suggestions that I might receive. D.

5 10

Re: Updates on the Death Prediction Lottery
by Anonymous Remailer (austria) 19 Jan '14

19 Jan '14

Good work with the DPL! I visited the site a few weeks ago and saw it was coming along very nicely. I do have a concern about buy-in costs though. Are you planning on ever lowering the costs to cheaper than 1 bitcoin? At the current price, many can't afford to make a prediction. If you lowered, more people would participate and the pool would grow larger, more quickly. Just a thought. On 01/18/2014 06:26 PM, David - wrote:> Some updates to DPL. > > 1) I have added a lot of names, mainly FISA court members and people from intelligence agencies. > 2) I have decided not to have multiple pools but to have every name in the same death pool. Most names qualify for 75% of the pool funds, a few for 100%. > > The list is not complete yet, and I would consider any suggestions that I might receive. > > D. > >

2 1

test 3
by Anonymous Remailer (austria) 19 Jan '14

19 Jan '14

t 3

2 1

TROY BENJEGER TRIES TO GET IN PROFESSIONAL VICTIMS PANTS
by Anonymous Remailer (austria) 19 Jan '14

19 Jan '14

and your angling to get in the professional victims pussy is obvious.. whats the matter cant make the bad persons stop telling the truth about your girlfriend? fuck you troy benjeger cock blocking anonpeople ps you give cypherpunks a bad name... pussy

2 1

AHEM! Please dont feed the Troll(s)!
by Anonymous Remailer (austria) 19 Jan '14

19 Jan '14

Sigh, seems every crop of new cypherpunks has to learn this lesson. Folks, Please DONT FEED the trolls here on cypherpunks.. dont repeat their subject lines dont respond to them, ignore them and killfile them if possible so you are not tempted to respond to them. Trust me its like wrestling with a pig in shit. after a while you notice the pig is enjoying him/herself. Anything you tell a troll will be used as more fuel for the fire.. trust me I have seen this many times! the anon moderator

3 2

Re: Cari Machet
by Juan Garofalo 19 Jan '14

19 Jan '14

--On Sunday, January 19, 2014 10:37 AM +1000 "James A. Donald" <jamesd(a)echeque.com> wrote: > > An actual native american, probably male, You mean, you using +a sockpuppet. > gets pissed because this faux > indian is an embarrassment to actual Indians. > > It would perhaps have been more entertaining had her argument been that > private property oppresses women. > > >

1 0

Is JYA now a medical Cannabis patient?
by Anonymous Remailer (austria) 19 Jan '14

19 Jan '14

hi everyone, Subject says it all, JYA has gotten rather loopy in his postings as of late refuses to bow to Ft Meade and the blessed repository of crypto knowledge our thought is the the NSA may be spiking/drugging his morning beverages or perhaps he is newly a medical cannabis patient... one does wonder

1 0

Re: anti-prosecution tactics. (Was Re:)
by Troy Benjegerdes 18 Jan '14

18 Jan '14

> a) JYA is being paid in laundered bitcoin for spreading FUD to > cypherpunks and privacy technologists; CIA now embracing altcoins for > darkops and payoffs. > > b) the emerging market for captured 0day is spilling over into overt > baiting tactics in public places like our beloved listserv; elevated > noise a signal for constructed focal points of interest tapping faux > target treasures. > > c) because honeypots I don't have a clue about JYA, but what I have seen on the bitcoin lists about address re-use and stealth addresses pretty much confirms that lots of people are getting paid, and many are getting manipulated into developing and promoting 'privacy and anonymity' systems that come pre-hacked with a feed to the highest bidder. The only real defense normal people have is transparency. The only people who can afford privacy are the ones shouting the loudest that we all have an inalienable right to keep shit secret, while they quietly tap our phones, bank accounts, cryptocoin wallets, and new media.

7 18