- cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

[WAR] Immigrant Crime Rates in Germany - the numbers
by Anti Fag 12 Feb '17

12 Feb '17

> Razer g2s at riseup.net > Thu Feb 9 17:13:11 PST 2017 > > The 9th circuit court just unanimously rejected the #MuslimBan > 'that wasn't a ban'... The argument was 'muslim ban' vs 'travel ban'. But it would be out of character for you to frame an argument honestly. > > Good on 'em! I listened to the hearing. Even the part where they never cited the law. US Code: https:// law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1182 "Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate." Be the truthful and courageous freedom fighter you purport to be. Or take your shill lies elsewhere.

1 0

[WAR] Immigrant Crime Rates in Germany - the numbers
by Anti Fag 12 Feb '17

12 Feb '17

> Cecilia Tanaka cecilia.tanaka at gmail.com > Thu Feb 9 17:06:55 PST 2017 > > Donald, that old bitch Bakc to the snitching and blaming, it seems. > > instead spread hate and intolerance here So this is your mission. > > fake news to post "Fake news" is how you discredit, much like "Asian Driver" > > says to be an "activist", a "defender of Human Rights" Like you. What kind of lawyer are you, Cecilia ? > > non-stop whining Is this a meta thread about you ?

1 0

Do as I say, not as I do...
by jim bell 12 Feb '17

12 Feb '17

http://pcwatch.blogspot.com/

1 0

[WAR] Ukraine's "Revolution of Dignity", 3 years on
by justa 12 Feb '17

12 Feb '17

How's that Soros "revolution" looking these days? ** Kiev Continues to Distinguish Itself as a Mecca of Tolerance and Western Values http://russia-insider.us9.list-manage.com/track/click?u=fa2faf7034c3c3c413c… ------------------------------------------------------------ by Paul Kaiser on Sat, Feb 11, 2017 The third anniversary of the "Revolution of Dignity" is just a few short days away. By now of course Ukraine is a full member in the EU and enjoys a standard of living that even Scrooge McDuck would envy.

1 0

[WAR] Western Journo Asks Assad If He’s ‘Grateful’ That US Coalition Is Illegally Bombing Syria
by justa 12 Feb '17

12 Feb '17

The YouTube gives a good idea of how Syria's Assad handles foreign journalists. Kinda humorous. ** Western Journo Asks Assad If He’s ‘Grateful’ That US Coalition Is Illegally Bombing Syria. His Response Is Solid Gold (VIDEO) http://russia-insider.us9.list-manage.com/track/click?u=fa2faf7034c3c3c413c… ------------------------------------------------------------ by Rudy Panko on Fri, Feb 10, 2017 Below is perhaps the most enjoyable verbal exchange we've seen concerning the ongoing horror in Syria, which admittedly is not a very amusing subject to speak about.A responsible internet article would provide a "blockquote" highlighting the juiciest morsels of irony and cognitive dissonance, followed by the mic drop retort.Sorry, we will not provide you with this. You have to watch the whole thing. Start to finish. (Don't be lazy, it's not very long.)We know that you are probably at work and are not allowed to watch YouTube videos, especially YouTube videos showing Assad ripping a dumb Belgian journalist a brand new anus, but as Audrey Hepburn once pointed out: rules are meant to be broken.

1 0

Smartphones: "a vast psychological questionnaire we're constantly filling out"
by Razer 11 Feb '17

11 Feb '17

We know EVERYTHING about you... We don't have to torture you, or cajole you. You tell us what we need to know, to control you, voluntarily. BWHAHAHA! > Mathematician Paul-Olivier Dehaye profiles the use of psychometrics in > political campaigns. Paul posted the recent Medium article “The > (dis)information mercenaries now controlling Trump's databases.” In a > Moment of Truth, Jeff Dorchen mangles a thermodynamic theory of evolution. Audio podcast on page: https://overcast.fm/+BPK0H72Rw

1 0

Fwd: Re: [tor-talk] Questions on the coming next-gen onion services
by Mirimir 11 Feb '17

11 Feb '17

This is excellent news, if accurate! -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Questions on the coming next-gen onion services Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 09:26:54 -0500 From: David Goulet <dgoulet(a)ev0ke.net> Reply-To: tor-talk(a)lists.torproject.org To: tor-talk(a)lists.torproject.org On 11 Feb (06:14:34), Lolint wrote: > Hi Hello! > > I have some questions about the coming switch to next-gen onion services: > > o What will happen to current onion services? Will they all be simply > discontinued or will there be a process by which they will be automatically > built again to form next-gen onions? The current services will still function for a while before we actually remove the support from tor. And that "while" will be few years at least. Both versions will live in parallel so you'll be able to have current service and next-gen service on the same tor instance. Currently, we do not plan to have an automatic transition to a next-gen address so if you want to create a next-gen address for your service, you'll have to simply configure a second service in the torrc indicating that you want the new version. We'll be documenting that process upon release. > > o What will happen to all the relays that are running versions of Tor that > don't support next-gen onion services? Good question. Onion services need basically three different type of relays, HSDir (directory), Intro point (IP) and Rendezvous Point (RP). The tor 0.3.0 release has the next-gen support for HSDir and IP. For the RP, the all current relays will work with next-gen. And for IP, next-gen services have a legacy option to use old IPs (<= 0.2.9). It has been put there for this transition period where we expect to have unfortunately a lot more tor out there that don't support next-gen. What is left is the HSDir that will have to be selected based on the protocol version advertised by the relay. So at first, there might be very few of those so there will be a period of time before we reached what we call "network maturity" which will allow us to switch from the current service protocol to the next-gen for all newly created services. This post on tor-dev@ kind of explain our intentions (but that might change overtime of course): https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2016-December/011725.html Cheers! David > > Thx --Jeff > -- > tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk(a)lists.torproject.org > To unsubscribe or change other settings go to > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk -- D88plxd8YeLfCIVAR9gjiFlWB1WqpC53kWr350o1pzw=

1 0

Pirate Bay: Blocked by Tier-1 Transit, Dumps 2M Torrents
by grarpamp 11 Feb '17

11 Feb '17

https://torrentfreak.com/internet-backbone-provider-cogent-blocks-pirate-ba… https://yro.slashdot.org/story/17/02/10/1443231/internet-backbone-provider-… https://www.reddit.com/r/torrents/comments/5t6vdu/ https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/5t388q/ https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/5t9t0c/ https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/5t356a/ https://www.reddit.com/r/Piracy/comments/5t215k/ https://www.reddit.com/r/evolutionReddit/comments/5t1yi8/ https://www.reddit.com/r/UnderReportedNews/comments/5t6z1e/ https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13612235 http://archiveteam.org/index.php?title=The_Pirate_Bay Several Pirate Bay users from ISPs all over the world have been unable to access their favorite torrent site for more than a week. Their requests are being stopped in the Internet backbone network of Cogent Communications, which has blackholed the CloudFlare IP-address of The Pirate Bay and many other torrent and streaming sites. When the average Internet user types in a domain name, a request is sent through a series of networks before it finally reaches the server of the website. This also applies to The Pirate Bay and other pirate sites such as Primewire, Movie4k, TorrentProject and TorrentButler. However, for more than a week now the US-based backbone provider Cogent has stopped passing on traffic to these sites. The sites in question all use CloudFlare, which assigned them the public IP-addresses 104.31.18.30 and 104.31.19.30. While this can be reached just fine by most people, users attempting to pass requests through Cogent's network are unable to access them. http://suprbayoubiexnmp.onion/ http://uj3wazyk5u4hnvtk.onion/static/dump/csv/torrent_dump_full.csv.gz The html version is a redundant subset, don't bother downloading it. zcat torrent_dump_full.csv.gz | egrep -i cypherpunk transmission-cli ... :)

2 4

Nice of 'em: "Microsoft Allowed To Sue US Government Over Email Surveillance"
by Razer 11 Feb '17

11 Feb '17

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-02-09/microsoft-can-pursue-sui…

1 0

Cmp: Handful of “highly toxic” Wikipedia editors cause 9% of abuse on the site
by Razer 11 Feb '17

11 Feb '17

Sounds familiar somehow... "We've all heard anecdotes about trolling on Wikipedia and other social platforms, but rarely has anyone been able to quantify levels and origins of online abuse. That's about to change. Researchers with Alphabet tech incubator Jigsaw worked with Wikimedia Foundation to analyze 100,000 comments left on English-language Wikipedia. They found predictable patterns behind who will launch personal attacks and when. The goal of the research team was to lay the groundwork for an automated system to "reduce toxic discussions" on Wikipedia. The team's work could one day lead to the creation of a warning system for moderators. The researchers caution that this system would require more research to implement, but they have released a paper with some fascinating early findings. To make the supervised machine-learning task simple, the Jigsaw researchers focused exclusively on ad hominem or personal attacks, which are relatively easy to identify. They defined personal attacks as directed at a commenter (i.e., "you suck"), directed at a third party ("Bill sucks"), quoting an attack ("Bill says Henri sucks"), or just "another kind of attack or harassment." They used Crowdflower to crowdsource the job of reviewing 100,000 Wikipedia comments made between 2004-2015. Ultimately, they used over 4,000 Crowdflower workers to complete the task, and each comment was annotated by 10 different people as an attack or not. Once the researchers had their dataset, they trained a logistic regression algorithm to recognize whether a comment was a personal attack or not. "With testing, we found that a fully trained model achieves better performance in predicting whether an edit is a personal attack than the combined average of three human crowd-workers," they write in a summary of their paper on Medium. Who is launching personal attacks? The researchers unleashed their algorithm on Wikipedia comments made during 2015, constantly checking results for accuracy. Almost immediately, they found that they could debunk the time-worn idea that anonymity leads to abuse. Although anonymous comments are "six times more likely to be an attack," they represent less than half of all attacks on Wikipedia. "Similarly, less than half of attacks come from users with little prior participation," the researchers write in their paper. "Perhaps surprisingly, approximately 30% of attacks come from registered users with over a 100 contributions." In other words, a third of all personal attacks come from regular Wikipedia editors who contribute several edits per month. Personal attacks seem to be baked into Wikipedia culture. The researchers also found that an outsized percentage of attacks come from a very small number of "highly toxic" Wikipedia contributors. A whopping 9% of attacks in 2015 came from just 34 users who had made 20 or more personal attacks during the year. "Significant progress could be made by moderating a relatively small number of frequent attackers," the researchers note. This finding bolsters the idea that problems in online communities often come from a small minority of highly vocal users. The algorithm was also able to identify a phenomenon often called the "pile-on." They found that attacking comments are 22 times more likely to occur close to another attacking comment. "Personal attacks cluster together in time," the researchers write. "Perhaps because one personal attack triggers another." Though this shouldn't be surprising to anyone who has ever taken a peek at Twitter, being able to quantify this behavior is a boon for machine learning. It means that an algorithm might be able to identify a pile-on before it really blows up, and moderators could come in to de-escalate before things get really ugly. Depressingly, the study also found that very few personal attacks are moderated. Only 17.9% of personal attacks lead to a warning or ban. Attackers are more likely to be moderated if they have launched a number of attacks or have been moderated before. But still, this is an abysmal rate of moderation for the most obvious and blatant form of abuse that can happen in a community. The researchers conclude their paper by calling for more research. Wikipedia has released a dump of all talk-page comments to the site between 2004-1015 via Figshare, so other researchers will have access to the same dataset that the Jigsaw team did. Understanding how attacks affect other users is urgent, say the researchers. Do repeated attacks lead to user abandonment? Are some groups attacked more often than others? The more we know, the closer we get to having good tools to aid moderators. Such tools, the researchers write, "might be used to help moderators build dashboards that better visualize the health of Wikipedia conversations or to develop systems to better triage comments for review." With linkage: https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/02/one-third-of-persona…

1 0