- cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

Building detailed profiles of Privileged Users' 'baseline normal’ behavior to spot intruders
by Razer 18 May '17

18 May '17

Free eBook if you fill out the form... Feeling lucky? Well do ya cypherpunk? THE GREATEST CHALLENGE OF IT SECURITY: How to distinguish friend and foe? BEHAVIOR IS THE NEW AUTHENTICATION https://pages2.balabit.com/uba-how-to-distinguish-friend-twitter/

2 1

Re: Fwd: [Webinar] Decrypting the WannaCry ransomware: Why is it happening and (how) is it going to end?
by Steven Schear 17 May '17

17 May '17

Any bets on whether ending cryptocurrency (esp. bitcoin) privacy & fungibility will be near the top of the discussions? Warrant Canary creator On May 17, 2017 11:48 AM, "Cecilia Tanaka" <cecilia.tanaka(a)gmail.com> wrote: Forwarding with tenderness and lots of kisses from Brazil ! <3 Ceci # May 17, International Day Against Homophobia, Transphobia and Biphobia - http://dayagainsthomophobia.org #LoveIsLove <3 ------- "Don't let anyone rob you of your imagination, your creativity, or your curiosity. It's your place in the world; it's your life. Go on and do all you can with it, and make it the life you want to live." - Mae Jemison ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <isoc-ams(a)isoc.org> Date: Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:17 PM Subject: [Webinar] Decrypting the WannaCry ransomware: Why is it happening and (how) is it going to end? To: cecilia.tanaka(a)gmail.com Dear members , As a result of last cyber attack that hit many countries worldwide, our partners from DiploFoundation and the Geneva Internet Platform have organised an open webinar for the community to provide an analysis of the main technological, geopolitical, legal, and economic aspects of the ransomware. Experts from different fields will discuss why ransomware has become a major issue: Can such attacks be prevented by technological measures alone? Is there a need for a legal response, such as Microsoft’s proposal for the Digital Geneva Convention? Is raising more awareness among users the ultimate solution? The webinar will discuss whether it is possible to put a stop to malicious software, or whether they should be considered the price we have to pay for the many advantages of the Internet. Choices on policy will have to be made sooner rather than later. The aim of the discussion is to explore and help make informed policy choices. How to participate? Date: Tomorrow - Thursday, 18th May, at 11:00 UTC (13:00 CEST). The virtual event is open for everyone , just register under this link : https://www.diplomacy.edu/registrations/wannacry-webinar Register to book your seat. The webinar link will be e-mailed to registrants one hour before the start. Regards , -- Nancy Quirós Development Manager LAC Chapters Email: quiros(a)isoc.org Skype: nancy_quiros Web: www.isoc.org

4 8

Fwd: [Webinar] Decrypting the WannaCry ransomware: Why is it happening and (how) is it going to end?
by Cecilia Tanaka 17 May '17

17 May '17

Forwarding with tenderness and lots of kisses from Brazil ! <3 Ceci # May 17, International Day Against Homophobia, Transphobia and Biphobia - http://dayagainsthomophobia.org #LoveIsLove <3 ------- "Don't let anyone rob you of your imagination, your creativity, or your curiosity. It's your place in the world; it's your life. Go on and do all you can with it, and make it the life you want to live." - Mae Jemison ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <isoc-ams(a)isoc.org> Date: Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:17 PM Subject: [Webinar] Decrypting the WannaCry ransomware: Why is it happening and (how) is it going to end? To: cecilia.tanaka(a)gmail.com Dear members , As a result of last cyber attack that hit many countries worldwide, our partners from DiploFoundation and the Geneva Internet Platform have organised an open webinar for the community to provide an analysis of the main technological, geopolitical, legal, and economic aspects of the ransomware. Experts from different fields will discuss why ransomware has become a major issue: Can such attacks be prevented by technological measures alone? Is there a need for a legal response, such as Microsoft’s proposal for the Digital Geneva Convention? Is raising more awareness among users the ultimate solution? The webinar will discuss whether it is possible to put a stop to malicious software, or whether they should be considered the price we have to pay for the many advantages of the Internet. Choices on policy will have to be made sooner rather than later. The aim of the discussion is to explore and help make informed policy choices. How to participate? Date: Tomorrow - Thursday, 18th May, at 11:00 UTC (13:00 CEST). The virtual event is open for everyone , just register under this link : https://www.diplomacy.edu/registrations/wannacry-webinar Register to book your seat. The webinar link will be e-mailed to registrants one hour before the start. Regards , -- Nancy Quirós Development Manager LAC Chapters Email: quiros(a)isoc.org Skype: nancy_quiros Web: www.isoc.org

1 0

[OT] [Human Rights] International Day Against Homophobia, Transphobia and Biphobia
by Cecilia Tanaka 17 May '17

17 May '17

International Day Against Homophobia, Transphobia and Biphobia http://dayagainsthomophobia.org #LoveIsLove <3 * Day Bonus: - Chelsea is Free, yay!!! :D Woohoo!!! \o/ \o/ \o/ https://twitter.com/xychelsea/status/864840675220754436 ------- "Don't let anyone rob you of your imagination, your creativity, or your curiosity. It's your place in the world; it's your life. Go on and do all you can with it, and make it the life you want to live." - Mae Jemison

1 0

Fwd: [tor-talk] Stipends available for the Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium
by grarpamp 17 May '17

17 May '17

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Roger Dingledine <arma(a)mit.edu> Date: Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:57 AM Subject: [tor-talk] Stipends available for the Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium To: tor-talk(a)lists.torproject.org Hi tor-talk! The PETS conference is where all of the academic privacy / anonymity experts gather each year: https://petsymposium.org/ This year it's in Minneapolis, July 18-21. Please consider joining us -- and if you do, be sure to stay for the hike on July 22, which is where many interactions and collaborations move forward. The list of accepted papers is up (and of course it is open access): https://petsymposium.org/2017/paperlist.php Thanks to the generosity of the National Science Foundation and (hopefully) Ford Foundation, we have stipends available again this year, to help get people to the symposium: https://petsymposium.org/2017/stipends.php The deadline for stipend application is May 31. We especially want to use the stipends to attract perspectives and motivations that are different from the usual academic research-and-publishing crowd. In the past we've had great participation from people who care about building and deploying the tools (aka hackers and activists), and from people who care about the societal implications of the research (aka artists and politicians). Thanks! --Roger -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk(a)lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

2 1

bitcoin incorporated
by juan 17 May '17

17 May '17

Here's a little company called https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockstream with direct ties to the most toxic, anti 'cypherpunk' forces on the planet. http://www.coindesk.com/blockstream-21-million-seed-capital/ "Additional investment firms...Google chairman Eric Schmidt’s Innovation Endeavors, " It turns out that blockstream's 'leaders' are pretty 'influential' bitcoin developers. They seem opposed to increasing the block size limit at the moment but they pretend that their political decision is 'apolitical' 'unbiased' 'code'. Now some background. Bitcoin, allegedly "A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution." keywords, peer to peer, no financial middlemen. Now it gets interesting. Blockstream has a solution to increase bitcoin's capacity, which I don't think can be described as "purely peer-to-peer" and involving no middlemen at all. As a matter of fact, blockstream solution is to create middlemen that will process the vast majority of transaction...because they can't scale bitcoin (technical failure) or they don't want (political failure).

4 3

Well yeah! The whole f*cking NSA... - "ShadowBrokers" 'likely includes a US insider'
by Razer 17 May '17

17 May '17

> WASHINGTON > > Cybersecurity experts believe the hacker who leaked the potent > software tool that powered last week’s global ransomware attacks is an > American – perhaps a disgruntled insider in the U.S. intelligence > community. > > Such a finding would raise the stakes for halting The Shadow Brokers > group, which has bedeviled the National Security Agency with releases > of its hacked weaponized cyber exploits for months. > > One of those leaked NSA tools allowed extortionists to spark havoc > last Friday by encrypting the hard drives of more than 200,000 > computers in 150 countries, the largest such cyberattack ever to hit > the globe. The attackers demanded $300 or more to unlock each computer. > > The NSA did not respond to a request for comment. > > The Shadow Brokers group first surfaced last August, claiming to have > breached the NSA and stolen sophisticated cyber tools. It sought to > auction off the NSA exploits but failed to find many buyers, releasing > some for free. It periodically has resurfaced with statements. > > The latest statement came at 2:16 a.m. Tuesday, a long, rambling > screed that used broken syntax to make it seem as if it were written > by a foreigner with poor English. But the message was filled with U.S. > cultural references that experts said were likely to have come only > from someone with a native’s familiarity. > > “I think they are Americans, and I think they are inside somewhere,” > said Dave Aitel, chief executive at Immunity, a Miami cybersecurity > company, who formerly was a chief scientist at the NSA. “Some of the > idioms they use are straight up native. You have to be a native to use > them.” > > Domestic cultural and political references fill the 1,100-word > statement, which carries the headline: “OH LORDY! Comey Wanna Cry > Edition.” > > In addition to references to James Comey, the ousted FBI director, and > the WannaCry ransomware that the extortionists deployed last Friday, > the statement made liberal use of idioms like “BFF” – or “best friends > forever” – and a vulgar expression that “Late Show” host Stephen > Colbert employed May 1 in talking about President Donald Trump. > With links @McClatchy: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/national-security/art…

1 0

Bell Canada hacked: 2m account details swiped
by Razer 17 May '17

17 May '17

> Bell Canada said Tuesday 1.9 million customer account details were > swiped by hackers – although stressed no payment card numbers or > passwords were slurped. > > The nation's largest telco said it is working with Canadian police to > figure out who was responsible for the disclosure of the customer > email addresses, and phone numbers and names of another 1,700 people. > > "There is no indication that any financial, password or other > sensitive personal information was accessed," Bell Canada said in its > brief statement > <http://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/bell-canada-statement-about-illegal-ac…> > on the matter. https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/05/16/bell_canada_quieting_fears_post_da…

1 0

Cryptocurrencies: Fast "Investor" EB-5 Citizenship Visas and FiatBleed
by grarpamp 16 May '17

16 May '17

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/01/11/2017-00441/eb-5-immigr… https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2017-01-11/pdf/2017-00441.pdf https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/USCIS/Outreach/IPO_Division_Chief… http://nakamotoinstitute.org/mempool/speculative-attack/

1 0

Re: What is the value of the State?
by jim bell 16 May '17

16 May '17

From: \0xDynamite <dreamingforward(a)gmail.com> >Without a State, would we have electronics? Radio? That's a question which displays a lack of knowledge of technical history. Radio transmission was known as a consequence of Maxwell's equations, Maxwell's equations . Heinrich Hertz Electronics can be traced to the "Fleming Valve", Fleming valve the rectifying diode implemented using the Edison effect, which was actually discovered by Frederick Guthrie. Frederick Guthrie Shortly afterwards, Lee DeForest Lee de Forest added a grid, which made it possible for the "vacuum tube" to oscillate and amplify, leading to radio communications. Radio broadcasting occurred BEFORE government regulation: Arguably, the need to allow many stations to share a limited spectrum made such regulation necessary. >Computers?Computers existed before IC's; I used one, the DEC PDP-7, in 1976-80. But at about $50,000 in 1964 dollars (about $500,000 in today's), the average individual wasn't going to buy one. What we know today as "computers" was primarily the product of the invention of the integrated circuit (IC) by MOSFET - Wikipedia various scientists and engineers. Once the concept of the Integrated circuit existed, and was seen to follow the scaling described by Moore's law (initially, in the 1960's, a doubling of transistors on a chip every 12 months; later in the 70's and 80's the doubling period lengthened to 18 months, then to 2 years in the 1990's and later), if one transistor was possible in, say, 1961, 13 years later 2**13 transistors (8192) was possible, in 1974. So, the development of early microprocessors such as Intel's 8080, 6502, and 6800 was virtually assured. This was definitely NOT the product of government! And it would have happened regardless of the "space race" of the 1960's and 70's. Also, you didn't mention The Internet. Statists are fond of suggesting that the United States government made the Internet possible. Well, no, it didn't. During a time in which that government was financing research, some money was spent to develop network interface controllers Network interface controller, which at the time typically fit into a single RETMA 19" rack. Not long afterwards, the same thing could have been (and was) implemented by means of more modern IC's. But at that point, "the Internet" (as we know it, or at least knew it in 1995), was still impossible. If you still doubt this, consider: Why didn't the Internet as we know it today exist in 1980? To me, the answer is simple. The fastest modem in common use by consumers at that time was a 300 bits-per-second, Bell 103 (different Bell!) compatible. Great improvements followed: 1200 bps in about 1981; 2400 bps in 1983, 9800 bps in the early 1990's. Modem I'd say it was the latter, 9600 bps, which really made the modern Internet plausible for the vast majority of the population. So, it was the people who developed and built 9600+bps modems that made the Internet (as we knew it, in 1995) possible. > MassTransit? I think most of the New York subway systems were originally privately financed and built. Similarly, most railroads. Similarly bus lines. And airlines. > Bikes? BTW, you haven't forgotten that powered human flight was first accomplished by Orville and Wilbur Wright, two bicycle mechanics. >And if we need a State, what form should it take? Written into history books as events long past. Jim Bell

9 58