- cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

Assange Wikileaks: CIA spy - David Morales UC Global S.L.
by grarpamp 28 Sep '19

28 Sep '19

https://elpais.com/elpais/2019/09/25/inenglish/1569384196_652151.html Spanish security company spied on Julian Assange in London for the United States Spain’s High Court is investigating the director of UC Global S. L. and the activities of his company, which had been hired to protect the Ecuadorian embassy in the English capital David Morales, the owner of the company, supposedly handed over audio and video to the CIA of the meetings Assange held with his lawyers and collaborators. Morales is being investigated for this activity by Spain’s High Court, the Audiencia Nacional. Cameras and external access for the US After the installation of new video cameras at the beginning of December 2017, Morales requested that his technicians install an external streaming access point in the same area so that all of the recordings could be accessed instantly by the United States. To do this, he requested three channels for access: “one for Ecuador, another for us and another for X,” according to mails sent at the time to his colleagues. When one of the technicians asked to contact “the Americans” to explain the way that they should access some of the spying systems installed in the embassy, Morales would always be evasive with his answers. Morales ordered his workers to install microphones in the embassy’s fire extinguishers and also in the women’s bathroom, where Assange’s lawyers, including the Spaniard Aitor Martínez and his closest collaborators, would meet for fear of being spied on. The cyberactivist’s meetings with his lawyers, Melynda Taylor, Jennifer Robinson and Baltasar Garzón, were also monitored. The UC Global S. L. team was also ordered by its boss to install stickers that prevented the windows of the rooms that the WikiLeaks founder used from vibrating, allegedly to make it easier for the CIA to record conversations with their laser microphones. ...

1 0

How much does it cost to make an elaborately fake pisstape?
by Ryan Carboni 27 Sep '19

27 Sep '19

https://gizmodo.com/ok-so-who-went-to-all-this-trouble-making-this-eerily-1… How much does it cost to make an elaborately fake pisstape? How much does it cost to scale it to thousands of hours of footage? Anyway, handling live animals is expensive. And to put it in the perspective of a common meme: "Help, I'm sending all my artists to make disinformation, why is my country awash with foreign movies?"

1 0

John McAfee: State of the Union Address
by grarpamp 27 Sep '19

27 Sep '19

https://twitter.com/officialmcafee/status/1177559781315436544 tweets 42.6k following 14.3k followers 1.06m likes 60.2k https://www.facebook.com/officialmcafee 85,338 people like this 91,499 people follow this Libra, Satoshi, Binance, and more... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxN7mitKD9I https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6rG60Kd-a4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDS6euQ43ms Wake up.

2 1

CyberBunker Raided
by grarpamp 27 Sep '19

27 Sep '19

https://www.apnews.com/be9947471fb74360b6cf9d1d2b535927 https://www.sueddeutsche.de/digital/darknet-razzia-trabach-trabern-drogen-1… https://www.rheinpfalz.de/lokal/artikel/mit-650-einsatzkraeften-cyberbunker… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CashAq5RToM https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CyberBunker http://www.cb3rob.org/ https://web.archive.org/web/20190427013216/https://cyberbunker.com/web/swat… http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-04-04/cyberbunker-hacking-as-perf… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4ZLqayQ-04 https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=cyberbunker https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=cb3rob

1 0

Google's biases exposed. (Was: Re: Troops Could Have Night Vision Injected Into Their Eyes)
by jim bell 27 Sep '19

27 Sep '19

We were discussing Greta Thunberg, who recently spoke at the United Nations, and I said that something was wrong with her, mentally. Well, after looking at some articles, one of them referred to Asperger's. So, I decided to do a Google search for 'greta thunberg aspergers'. After typing her name and adding a single 'a', or 'greta thunberg a', Google search offered me a few selections: "age", "actress", article", "and jane goodall, "at UN", "turns Trump's Attack". So, I decided to add a another character: 'greta thunberg as'. Then, Google search offered me new selections: "as", "astrology", "asiA", "astrology chart", "assemblee nationale", "as a child". Hmmm. No "Aspergers". So, I decided to add another character. Guess which one: 'greta thunberg asp'. Google search offered...NOTHING. Nothing at all. Not a single suggestion. If she had been fond of "asparagus", Google wouldn't volunteer that information. If she had been bitten by an "asp", we wouldn't have learned it. If she was suffering from an infection of "aspergillus fungus", that would have remain a deep, dark secret. If she had an allergy to "aspartame", we wouldn't have discovered that, either. If she had visited "Aspen Dental", no one would be the wiser. As I continued to add characters, Google search continued to offer...nothing. Nothing at all. Not a single suggestion...until I had put in the final character: "greta thunberg aspergers". Even then, it didn't include this as a suggestion. What's really interesting is that, especially how Politically Correct Google is, presumably it genuinely believes that having "Aspergers" isn't something for anybody to be ashamed of. So, that being the case, you'd think that they wouldn't re-program Google search AS IF "Aspergers" WAS something to be ashamed of. Or a negative, in general. Or something that should be concealed. Because it sure looks like that's what they did. Something needs to be done about Google. What REALLY needs to be done is for governments, in general, to stop doing whatever they are doing to keep Google in a virtually monopolistic (or, at least oligopolistic) state. I mean, change things so that instead of there being a single Google, there are a few dozen companies that cannot behave as if they owned the networking market. Because one alternative would be to sue Google using America's anti-trust laws, and break it up like was done to Standard Oil around 1900, or AT&T by Judge Greene, in 1983. Jim Bell

2 1

Cryptocurrency: Countries Stashing Decentralized Coins as Reserves and for Payments
by grarpamp 27 Sep '19

27 Sep '19

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-09-26/venezuela-has-bitcoin-st… https://decrypt.co/9697/venezuela-central-bank-holding-bitcoin-just-crazy-e… http://criptojuris.blogspot.com/ Instead of returning empty, tankers worldwide will be carrying crypto... Venezuela's central bank is running internal tests to determine whether it can hold cryptocurrencies in its coffers. The efforts come at the behest of state-run Petroleos de Venezuela SA, which is seeking to send Bitcoin and Ethereum to the central bank and have the monetary authority pay the oil company's suppliers with the tokens, according to the people, who asked not to be identified discussing internal deliberations. Staffers are also studying proposals that would allow cryptocurrencies to be counted toward international reserves, now near a three-decade low at $7.9 billion. U.S. sanctions against Nicolas Maduro's authoritarian regime have largely isolated Venezuela from the global financial system, exacerbating one of world's most severe economic crises and forcing officials to use a patchwork of methods to move money around. While Maduro's prior efforts to start the world's first sovereign crypto largely failed, the continued efforts to use digital currencies shows how desperate the government is to come up with a way to skirt the restrictions. https://www.theblockcrypto.com/tiny/portugals-tax-authority-says-crypto-tra… https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/cx1tgw/portugals_tax_authority_sa… https://www.ccn.com/21-of-bitcoin-hasnt-moved-for-five-years-stroking-monum… https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/d9tir5/why_bitcoin_is_going_to_in… https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/cz65ds/why_bitcoin/ https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/d3iay0/governments/ https://i.redd.it/06l1lyft44l31.jpg https://i.redd.it/7c9oswkmncl31.jpg https://i.redd.it/q5zb3te8nzm31.png https://i.redd.it/dgvkyy0j4xo31.jpg https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/d9i096/zoom_out_you_fools/

1 0

Amazon Sidewalk is a new long-range wireless network for your stuff – TechCrunch
by jim bell 27 Sep '19

27 Sep '19

https://techcrunch.com/2019/09/25/amazon-sidewalk-is-a-new-long-range-wirel…

3 4

NYTimes snitches Ukraine phone call whistleblower, tries to rationalize it under false pretenses
by Razer 27 Sep '19

27 Sep '19

>> Recognizing that outing the whistleblower may not be viewed as an appropriate decision, the report included a quote from Dean Baquet, the executive editor of the Times, where he stated, “The role of the whistleblower, including his credibility and his place in the government, is essential to understanding one of the most important issues facing the country—whether the president of the United States abused power and whether the White House covered it up.” > It actually is not. The contents of the disclosure are all the public needs to determine whether the president committed an abuse of power, covered up an abuse of power, and engaged in conduct that rises to the level of impeachment. > The inspector general’s office for the “intelligence community” already determined—within the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act—that the allegations rose to the level of a matter of “urgent concern.” That gave the whistleblower credibility, regardless of what any politician in Congress or staff member in the White House may say." https://shadowproof.com/2019/09/26/new-york-times-outs-individual-behind-uk… Rr Sent from my Androgyne dee-vice with K-9 Mail

2 1

Troops Could Have Night Vision Injected Into Their Eyes
by jim bell 26 Sep '19

26 Sep '19

https://www.newsbreakapp.com/n/0Muu0Mmw?s=a3&pd=02h1yVjC Troops Could Have Night Vision Injected Into Their Eyes Popular Mechanics Researchers in China and the U.S. have created injectable night vision that works in mice. If the technology transfers to humans, it could mean doing away with large, cumbersome night vision goggles for troops. The only problem? The process requires injections into the eyeball. In the near future, U.S. troops could trade in their night vision goggles for a direct eye injection that allows them to see in the dark. The process, being developed by scientists in both the U.S. and China, has already proven successful in laboratory mice. The researchers are confident it would work in humans, too. Shared from News Break

5 11

Re: [liberationtech] Internet transition to private industry
by grarpamp 26 Sep '19

26 Sep '19

> I'm not seeing the move of the net to "private" as much as I am seeing > the net moving into the hands of quasi national entities, such as ICANN, > that have almost national powers ICANN and all proposals otherwise, are "legally" incorporated in specific political jurisdictions, thus under full control of government political whims. Same as if handed over to the UN. > but no foundation in territory (thus > outside of the Peace of Westphalia formulation) or of any form of "we > the people" creative act by biological humans. Such whims of power generally do not care too much about biological humans, to wit power's wars killing and chattel keeping, of same. And more. As someone noted earlier, ICANN and other bodies like it were doomed when they started in the copyright, identity, censorship, and other regulatory games. Instead of sticking solely to the business of moving packets agnostically, and refusing all other roles. > My sense is this > fragmentation of plenary authority absent strong constitutional > constraints or public accountability is > is going to become one of the great problems You all gave up the promise and hope of the internet the moment you let governments blanket unwarranted mass spy all over it, when you let corporations cave to political censor pressure, when you let govcorp conspire making "laws" to prevent and $fee you from routing around all their bullshit in truly private neighbor-to-neighbor-multihomed house-to-house biz-to-biz peer-to-peer land_parcel-to-land_parcel guerrilla mesh networks around the world. By continuing to be babies handing off your proper and rightful independant P2P responsibilities as such to govcorps by paying $75 internet + $50 phone + $nn in taxes to them, instead of doing it yourselves in your localities P2P linked to other locales for less. For letting them all steal from you right under your eyes with your consent for decades... https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2019/09/sprint-took-fcc-cash-for-servin… The problem is you, and yours alone. > As for the move of the net towards "private" we have to realize that > "private" is really a kind of dynamic, and ever changing balance over > who has the power What you first have to realize is that you dumbshits gave the power up. Oops. Then you become actually free to think up some new ways to get things done without resorting to that. > There is always a public overlay to nominally private things. What a load of statist sheep apologist bullshit that is. And note the creeping definition weasel words "nominally private". That's why the internet is a loss, all those sorts of self-subjugative and deprecating ideas right there. Did you know there are companies racing to create brain scanners so that your once "nominally private" thoughts become signals on forced polygraph exams? Which imples you should also be aware of... https://antipolygraph.org/ > even private land can be taxed What a load of statist sheep apologist bullshit that is. Ever think of personally giving to local charity instead? Programming that into kids in schools as the freedom preserving way to do things instead. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9yX248DC3k https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0-cgs51zEA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6C1M_7BzZ0 https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=taxation+is+theft See also... "The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks". > the criminal laws of the land still apply to acts performed on that land. Look at all the censorship... you're going to love it when they roll out and enforce use of the Great TLS Terminator MITM Spy Tool everywhere. And come to take "your" banned books from you on "your" land. And slap a muzzle on you on their way out because you don't have freedom of speech or free speech anymore on the internet either. You got exactly what you whined, cried, and complained for. > That balance will forever be shifting back and forth, > based on the competition among political That's because you keep letting them distract and play you out of your rights with their game. Hook line sinker. > And because a network is a synergy of its pieces there is "the curse of > the installed base" that will act as an anchor. They're your neighbors, don't curse, go say hi to them, advance them up out of the water so you both can travel freely. Because you gave that away too... https://papersplease.org/ > So even a private internet (or as I see it, a world in which there will > be multiple internets connected by highly policed bridges) will be > constrained by a web of legal, financial, and technical obligations and > duties. Why is those balkan bridges, those mired restraints existing? Oh, right, because you called for and let them happen. > (I wrote a somewhat long blog entry about how I see the net fragmenting > here: https://www.cavebear.com/cavebear-blog/internet_quo_vadis/ ) > > Personally I believe that there must be some realm in which people must > be free to try out new ideas and take risks. Right, nothing limiting you there but what you foolishly put and keep in place over you hindering your freedom. > But we have to be careful not to sweep unknowing and > non-consenting members of the public into new private innovations. If people weren't lying about that they would deprecate to and educate the "public" to make their own choices and things. Government and profit corporations are hardly in the business of doing that, it's a conflict of interest, so they lie. And you'll have to do it yourself without them. > I am giving a talk in late October on the topic of the responsibilities > of private network operators as the internet moves into a world in which > users believe, rightly or wrongly, that it is safe for them to depend on > the proper operation of the net in matters of safety, finance, and > health - in other words, as people come to view the internet as a > lifeline grade utility. Good, maybe then they will rise up and demand, better yet deploy for themselves, the vision of a true end-to-end uncensored unsurveilled fully encrypted internet. > This ought to create an image in one's mind of an internet, perhaps > privately owned (at least in pieces) but owned in the same way as our > today's public utilities for electricity, gas, and (in the past) "the > telephone company". "Public utilities" aka "Government utilities" are at the whim of shifting govenment political games. History has already shown them unsuitable owners or overseers of country or local internets. The amount of people now foolishly crying for "Municipal" broadband is ridiculous. Go build your own distributed version within your locales. It's not hard or expensive. (Do not ever for one second think the GFW or Social Score will not come to you, it already has, and it's well documented in the news of your respective countries. You cannot even use SneakerNet to safely move your packets across "borders" anymore without risk of confiscation and imprisonment. Nor can you encrypt your stuff inside your own countries either because they'll beat you with a wrench in contempt prison for that too.) And both Govt and "private profit companies" are generally against you to the point of making it really hard to break free from whatever [internet] shit they're doing to you. (Did you read the news that all countries are now starting up their own Internet Military War Departments, complete with Secret Attack Operations, Satellite Destruction, Censors, National Peering Kill Switches, etc. And you think those will not spark next big physical wars? Did you agree to that?) Stop crying for them to come and save you. Save yourself, do it yourself, and keep it that way. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngpsJKQR_ZE > And also wrapped in elevated standards of care > (i.e. requiring that one operate their private bailiwick with higher > than the present levels of care in order to avoid liability on the > grounds of negligence.) Technology now exists to build distributed ownership, parcel based, end-to-end internet where drop in commodity opensource routing nodes conform to a global mesh spec and route around such "poor standards" "negligience" "censorship" "control". Did you know that new technology exists that lets you route your private money packets around such bullshit too? Even over some encrypted network overlays too... https://xmr.to/ https://z.cash/ https://bitcoin.com/ + privacy tools https://blocknet.co/block-dx/ https://torproject.org/ Etc... and that's only the first generation of them... You all keep trying to set up "governance" and "regulation" for the Internet. All those legacy governmental models, over and over again, which aren't really that great and which history shows are doomed to fail. So try something completely different and novel for once... don't setup anything, just say no. Given you've never tried before, you're odds of success are at least 50%, which is monumentally better chance than everything else you've tried and failed at before. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FGVKcsdafU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xau5lPZzztc https://freekeene.com/files/marketforliberty.pdf https://www.ucg.org/the-good-news/the-life-cycles-of-empires-lessons-for-am… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kZPY4lgYmM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmCNMQ7TOgY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kW7tWSc-FTo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nu4tB9hP3xc

1 0