- cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

Re: latest false flag attack?
by juan 27 Oct '18

27 Oct '18

I originally was wondering about the NEXT false flag attack or inside job that tazer's employers, that is the US military, will do. Somehow we ended up talking about a previous inside job. So, to recap some facts about 9/11 : 1) there was no 'hijacked' commercial plane at the pentagon (thanks James for linking evidence) 2) WTC7 is an example of controlled demolition that gets a score of 9/10, it is so good. 3) of course the twin towers were blown up using the same technique, apart from the damage from 'planes' that alone could not have brought them down in the way that was seen on tee vee. 4) the party that promotes the official conspiracy theory has a track record of hundreds of years of mass murder and a bunch of other crimes against humanity. Taking a single word of what they say as half credible is a joke. But anyway, see 1), 2), 3) above.

9 114

“would destroy the entire master narrative of official liberal historiography” - Ivan "the terrible" - [PEACE]
by Zenaan Harkness 27 Oct '18

27 Oct '18

Ivan "the terrible" was terrible to the western "elite" and Jewish bankers running and profiting from the Slavic slave trade raids into Russia, taking 100s of 1000s of Slavs and selling them all over "the world". Bankers of yore, bankers of today. Russian slavic "near animals" of Ivan's time, "it's the Russians!" of today. A little history courtesy Dr. Matthew Raphael Johnson: Ivan the 'Terrible' Wasn't Terrible at All - an Oligarch-Busting, Virtuous Hero, Demonized by the West https://russia-insider.com/en/history/ivan-terrible-wasnt-terrible-all-olig… … The Balkan Slavs and the Russians were at war with a huge network of capital at the end of the Renaissance that has yet to be analyzed in English. The tight bond among immensely wealthy Jews, European elites and Tartar empire-builders would destroy the entire master narrative of official liberal historiography. This alliance, and several others to the north and west, caused Moscow to engage in Herculean efforts to mobilize enough men and resources to keep three or four large enemies at bay simultaneously. This had to be done also with harsh winters, poor soil, difficult travel and internal divisions often goaded by foreigners. This is the source of the Muscovite policy of centralization and service-estate monarchy. It is the historical condition for the Russian mind and defined the Russian national character.4 The literature in English usually decries the “lust for power” of the tsars and the “massacre” of helpless Muslims and defenders of Kazan under Ivan IV. The official narrative is uncomfortable with the fact that Russia barely escaped total genocide at this time, and only by the total mobilization of every possible man to create a war machine capable of defending its own borders was Russia ever preserved at all. In the best of times this was a risky gamble. At the worst of times, millions of Russians were exterminated, enslaved and exploited. …

1 0

Documentary: Loose Change, Remo Conscious
by grarpamp 27 Oct '18

27 Oct '18

1 0

The Assassination Of Donald Trump
by Steven Schear 27 Oct '18

27 Oct '18

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-10-23/cj-hopkins-assassination-donald-t…

8 8

the Expression Problem and its solutions - [PROGRAMMING]
by Zenaan Harkness 27 Oct '18

27 Oct '18

The Expression Problem is faced by all programmers who create anything other than simple programs. Represent abstractions with types, add procedures, methods or functions (choose your term) to manipulate those types, and some time later, one is invariably faced with the 2 problems: - adding new types/ classes - adding new operations/ functions This be the essence of the problem of programming abstractions. Eli Bendersky does a fine job of both laying out this "fundamental" problem of computing and the traditional approaches to solving this problem, namely: - OO programming with syntax for classes (syntactically co-located data with the operations on that data), whereby adding types is relatively straightforward (provided for syntactically); whilst adding operations requires changing function sets or "interfaces", which in general requires more than merely adding functions, impacting (undesirably) the type declarations (classes). - functional programming inverts this ease of modification aspect, since operations are the first order syntax, which thus leads the programmer to design his program with functions/ operations as primal, thus adding functions is the simple program extension mechanism just like adding data types or classes is the simple OO extension mechanism; whilst adding new data types in the functional language requires all existing functions to be (again, undesirably) modified to handle the new data type. The same "expression problem" thus manifests from either side of the programming language spectrum. Velly interdasting. Bendersky lays it out clearly, and with nice little matrix PNG images, then goes on with the (relatively, at least in C++) complex "visitor pattern" which is typically used to solve this problem in C++, using virtual multiple inheritance and dynamic type checking - not the simplicity we crave for our programming solution baskets. Enter the White Knight, Clojure, with syntax so powerful only Lisp dialects raise their heads in a collective superiority sneer. The secret? Clojure syntactically hides multiple dispatch behind reasonably elegant syntax - so the performance hit is there, but at least achieving the result is not a syntactic nightmare of virtual multiple inheritance + RTTI functionality or some ungodly template syntax. But it's actually only single dispatch? Yes, there be more lurking secrets - what Clojure calls "open methods": “Note a crucial difference between how methods are defined in C++/Java and in Clojure. In C++/Java, methods have to be part of a class and defined (or at least declared) in its body. You cannot add a method to a class without changing the class's source code. In Clojure, you can. In fact, since data types and multimethods are orthogonal entities, this is by design. Methods simply live outside types - they are first class citizens, rather than properties of types. We don't add methods to a type, we add new methods that act upon the type. This doesn't require modifying the type's code in any way (or even having access to its code).” Clojure "protocols" (from Java POV, "simple, usuall single-method Interfaces) also get a look in. Here's the source, Luke: The Expression Problem and its solutions https://eli.thegreenplace.net/2016/the-expression-problem-and-its-solutions/ Bendersky even does a second round - recommended: More thoughts on the Expression Problem in Haskell https://eli.thegreenplace.net/2018/more-thoughts-on-the-expression-problem-… So notwithstanding that Clojure runs on the JVM, note Java's first class syntactic citizens are classes (in comparison to Clojure's first class functions): java - What is a first class citizen function? - Stack Overflow https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5178068/what-is-a-first-class-citizen-f… “So, objects are the first class citizens in java. Admittedly, java8 supports passing of methods (method behavior, to be precise) to other methods using functional interfaces and lambda expressions. But that does not mean that java has functions as first class citizens.” Note that Java 8 syntactically adds "first class functions" which are represented internally/ in the JVM, as classes (perhaps this is how Clojure runs on the JVM?): Java 8: Simple Example of First-class Functions http://4dev.tech/2015/08/java-8-simple-example-of-first-class-functions/ (Observing Java's predicates and other such Lisp wanna be syntax, it's rather fugly IMEHO.) The link to Bendersky was highlighted by Stephen Mann in his this week's mailing list mailout, where he also links to his recent blog on "good names" in programming: Good Code Depends on Good Names https://stephenmann.io/post/good-code-depends-on-good-names/ I can't find his email list archives, but here's his blog index: http://stephenmann.io/

1 1

US History: Assassination and Free Speech
by grarpamp 26 Oct '18

26 Oct '18

https://wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_presidential_assassination… https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Threatening_the_President_of_the_United_States Subject in the news lately. Lots of documentaries available online for history buffs.

1 0

US History: Mass Surveillance
by grarpamp 26 Oct '18

26 Oct '18

https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_surveillance_in_the_United_States

1 0

Machine Identification Code: Print Analyze Burn
by grarpamp 26 Oct '18

26 Oct '18

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_Identification_Code A Machine Identification Code (MIC), also known as printer steganography, yellow dots, tracking dots or secret dots, is a digital watermark which certain color laser printers and copiers leave on every single printed page, allowing to identify the device with which a document was printed and giving clues to the originator. Developed by Xerox and Canon in the mid-1980s, its existence became public only in 2004. In 2018, scientists developed privacy software to anonymize prints in order to support whistleblowers publishing their work.

1 0

First US quantum network.
by jim bell 26 Oct '18

26 Oct '18

https://techcrunch.com/2018/10/25/new-plans-aim-to-deploy-the-first-u-s-qua… About 800 kilometers of unused fiber optic cable running down the U.S. eastern seaboard is set to become the first stateside quantum network. The aim is to get the quantum network up and running and accepting customers by the end of the year, making it the first time that quantum keys will be exchanged commercially on U.S. soil. Quantum Xchange, a Bethesda, Maryland-based quantum communications provider, has inked a deal for Zayo, a fiber network giant, to provide the stretch of fiber from Boston to Washington, DC. Its first aim is to help connect Wall Street financiers with their back operations in nearby New Jersey, but the hope is that other industries — from healthcare to critical infrastructure — will soon use the network for their own secure communications. Quantum cryptography and networking aren’t new concepts, but have risen to prominence in recent years as both a threat to some encryption and also the savior of future secure communications. Relying on photons and the laws of quantum physics to share encryption keys over a long distance from one place to another makes it significantly harder to intercept the keys without breaking the beam or perfectly cloning a copy. This technique, known as quantum key distribution (QKD), is seen as a likely contender for the future of end-to-end encryption. Although quantum cryptography has been around for years, it’s only been recently that scientists and computer engineers have harnessed the technology for practical uses. Soon, the technology could be used for protecting elections, transmitting payments and securing communications between data centers — even from satellites back to earth. Europe has already seen some success in building a small-scale quantum network, but “shortcomings” made bringing the system to the U.S. more difficult, said Quantum Xchange chief executive John Prisco. His company uses trusted node technology that passes quantum key data from point to point over a larger distance, making it easier to scale a quantum network over wider geographical spaces. “Organizations with offices in Boston will be able to send secure communications to a partner in D.C., and eventually even further – as the goal is to keep buying up optical fiber that is already in the ground all over the country so that we can provide a secure quantum network that will serve the entire nation,” he said. Prisco said it’s “critical” to establish a quantum key distribution network as a defensive measure “before the unprecedented power of quantum computers become an offensive weapon.”

3 3

D-Wave offers the first public access to a quantum computer From Python to parallel universes
by jim bell 25 Oct '18

25 Oct '18

https://techcrunch.com/2018/10/05/d-wave-offers-the-first-public-access-to-… utside the crop of construction cranes that now dot Vancouver’s bright, downtown greenways, in a suburban business park that reminds you more of dentists and tax preparers, is a small office building belonging to D-Wave. This office — squat, angular and sun-dappled one recent cool Autumn morning — is unique in that it contains an infinite collection of parallel universes. Founded in 1999 by Geordie Rose, D-Wave worked in relative obscurity on esoteric problems associated with quantum computing. When Rose was a PhD student at the University of British Columbia, he turned in an assignment that outlined a quantum computing company. His entrepreneurship teacher at the time, Haig Farris, found the young physicists ideas compelling enough to give him $1,000 to buy a computer and a printer to type up a business plan. The company consulted with academics until 2005, when Rose and his team decided to focus on building usable quantum computers. The result, the Orion, launched in 2007, and was used to classify drug molecules and play Sodoku. The business now sells computers for up to $10 million to clients like Google, Microsoft and Northrop Grumman. “We’ve been focused on making quantum computing practical since day one. In 2010 we started offering remote cloud access to customers and today, we have 100 early applications running on our computers (70 percent of which were built in the cloud),” said CEO Vern Brownell. “Through this work, our customers have told us it takes more than just access to real quantum hardware to benefit from quantum computing. In order to build a true quantum ecosystem, millions of developers need the access and tools to get started with quantum.” Now their computers are simulating weather patterns and tsunamis, optimizing hotel ad displays, solving complex network problems and, thanks to a new, open-source platform, could help you ride the quantum wave of computer programming. [end of partial quote]

1 0