- cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

Reclaim the Rainbow - self identify as a PoC and get a Brown University scholarship
by Zenaan Harkness 29 Nov '17

29 Nov '17

So Brown University is going all-in on "everything is a social construct, muh feelz is all that matters": Brown University Will Allow Students to ‘Self-Identify’ as a Person of Color http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2017/11/29/brown-university-will-allow-any-st… One wonders whether self-identifying as a person of White color would assist in the minority benefit stakes? If being a "Yellow" Chinese is now "a minority entitled to benefits", how many Whites have to be killed in order for the Huwaites to be able to 'legitimately' claim minotiry status? Or can Whites only be minorities if they're also gender uncertain? Perhaps we need a new color/ minotiry status - "snowflake uniqueness" - easy to claim, no one would dispute it, and applies equally to everyone. Can political beliefs classify one for minority benefits at my local university? "Yeah, death to all governments! - now where's my social studies scholarship?!" You know my gram pa said all them years back, that social constructs are nothing but a dang social construct! Only thing he added after that was "yo", then bit the dust bemoaning Japanese trannies from Brazicuador. _ {(=)} ¦¦¦ ===_______= ASCII pic of a 240⨠18.5V AC→DC transformer, Japanese design. The "Made in Brazicuador" sticker was a bit too big to fit...

1 0

[OMELETTE] Germany on track to minimize crime stats since immigration influx
by turnituptoeleven＠hushmail.com 29 Nov '17

29 Nov '17

> > San Juro saanjuro at grnail.com > Sat Nov 25 08:26:17 PST 2017 > > > hate-mongering > bullshit > It is not clear what is "hate"ful about zztop's messages, at least the ones full of links. It's not different than grarpamp's messages. In fact, "hate" isn't something that can be avoided. "To love is to know hate. To hate is to know love." > > nobody cares about, reads, > or has any interest in your > constant stream of vitriol > Again, it is unclear what is bad with criticism or with facts. Will you rebut his claims? Or will you channel your "hate" into another spam message to the list? > > brown "refugees" shouldn’t be allowed > to seek sanctuary > Maybe this is your problem. "Brown" is a descriptive identifier of color, not a type of person. To label someone to "brown" is strips them of their ancestral heritage and cultural identity. Such is to identify or label with "white" or "black". People are more than this. Also, "refugees" are being relocated to mostly European nations, given priority over immigrants, and given tax-payer money, enough to pay taxes, for which they are exempt, while being deemed "culturally unfit" to obey the laws and face responsibility for their actions. Why are the homeless not treated good like this? Where do you live, samurai? > > because they stab everybody > You forgot rape, unless you don't think a penis is a knife, though it seems like you do. #metoo > > WTF does that have to do with cryptography > or anarchy? > What does your spam post have to do with these things? This is a National Socialist board, with people from the entire spectrum, though mostly marxist communists and anarcho-libertarians, lol. All are greedy capitalists at heart. > > I guess most people just ignore you? > Yep. Because most people are piece of shit. ZAY-Z offers more to list than anybody. Unless you wc -c the archives, then cecelia does. > > hurr durr, facts are bad > Well argued. ucr.fbi.gov/hate-crime

6 6

Re: [Cryptography] Intel Management Engine pwnd
by grarpamp 29 Nov '17

29 Nov '17

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:17 PM, Jerry Leichter <leichter(a)lrw.com> wrote: > You could block this entire mechanism by using an external Ethernet interface and not connecting the built-in one to anything No. Not if your "external" NIC contains one of the Intel controllers with support. These days most of Intel's have it. PCI is PCI, slotted or soldered. Caveat blobs and secret sharing, one might presume, perhaps slightly less foolishly, that other brands of controllers don't participate AMT/ME. > connecting it to a separate management network fully isolated from the Internet and carefully controlled. Cisco, Juniper, Huawei, Chelsio, etc... all closed source TOP SECRET blobs too. When even your eyeglasses are secrets, you have no idea what truly is or is not passing right in front of them. > But not many will choose to do that because of the additional cost and likely performance implications. First you have to get them woked to the predicament they've buried themselves in. Then deal with how to dig out of it and where to go once freed from the mire.

1 0

Re: [Cryptography] Intel Management Engine pwnd
by grarpamp 29 Nov '17

29 Nov '17

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 8:57 PM, James A. Donald <jamesd(a)echeque.com> wrote: > unexpected operating system. The OS has nothing to do with it, other than the proprietary closed source blob called Windows that is sold with Intel / Windows tools to manage other remote Intel AMT/ME instances (ie: in the enterprise and by attackers). > Listening on a port is not a chip level function. No. It can be a chip level function. Exactly the same as some magic WOL wake on LAN, LOM lights out management, remote KVM key vid mouse, etc all are. Such chips functions just eat the packets from the physical interface before they get to the OS, before the OS sends RST, etc. Further, since nobody has any actual proof or independant certification process as to what exactly is truly inside the chips and devices they're buying, one should not be so hesitant to assume that the damn things are faultless or innocent. Especially given history. Readers of the Intel docs will also note that AMT/ME only did works with certain series of their ethernet controller hardware, at least near while ago labeled with, if recalled correct, an 'L'. Because those are the ones doing the snooping and feeding into the southbridge for processing by AMT/ME firmware therein. #OpenFabs #OpenHW #OpenSW Why are so few demanding this basic requirement of trust? Probably for the same reason they refuse to acknowledge cryptocurrency. They're stupid. And pwnd.

1 0

Still Mad About Trump as President? Salt-In Planned for Election Anniversary! :D
by This Isn̈'t 29 Nov '17

29 Nov '17

> > On 11/26/2017 at 08:03 AM, "Cecilia Tanaka" wrote: > > > #MAGA > > "Morons Are Governing America". > > Makes sense, dear. :) > Very correct. Only morons would want higher crime and taxes. ---- "TRUMP BELIEVES GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN INEVITABLE" "President Trump on Tuesday cast doubt on Washington’s ability to avoid a government shutdown, writing that he didn't believe a deal could be reached with Democrats: "Meeting with 'Chuck and Nancy' today about keeping government open and working...Problem is they want illegal immigrants flooding into our Country unchecked, are weak on Crime, and want to substantially RAISE Taxes. I don’t see a deal!"" archive.is/s2cIv ---- U.S. President Donald J. Trump. Savior of Western Civilization. I have attached an image.

2 1

[WAR] [RWN] Netanyahu quickly distances Israel away from DailyStormer comments
by This Isn̈'t 29 Nov '17

29 Nov '17

> >_ On 11/27/2017 at 6:53 PM, "__ Steven Schear" wrote:_ > > > real reasons for the war > What are these reasons? > > Jews, as a group, among the highest incomes > This is a lie. You might be thinking of the false 1% statistic. Or the correct bitcoin one. Christians, as a group, have the higest incomes. Sources, such as: pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/10/11/how-income-varies-among-u-s-religious-…, commit this 'income by religious group' lie by fragmenting christianity's various flavors, and by ignoring the 'per capita' balancing. There are: ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS: Christianity Judaism Islam OTHER RELIGIONS: Atheism Mormonism Scientologia Kopimism Since half the world's "money" belongs to: - Warren Buffett - Bill Gates - Amancio Ortega - Carlos Slim - Jeff Bezos - Mark Zuckerberg - Larry Ellison - Michael Bloomberg With 25% (or 37.5%) being Jewish.

1 0

Hildreth and Nick talk Trading and Futures at $10k
by grarpamp 28 Nov '17

28 Nov '17

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lm_gHX1gFlg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjJ-G0PVHxY https://imgur.com/UOJK8An

1 0

Re: [Cryptography] Cryptocurrency: Rubin Report with Roger Ver, plus Rick Falkvinge on RT
by grarpamp 28 Nov '17

28 Nov '17

On 11/28/17, Ben Laurie <benl(a)google.com> wrote: > On 27 November 2017 at 23:15, grarpamp <grarpamp(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6NscwzbMvI >> >> Rubin Report: Roger Ver (Bitcoin Investor) joins Dave to >> discuss Bitcoin 101. Bitcoin is digital money used for >> secure and instant transfer of value anywhere in the world. >> It is not controlled or issued by any bank or government, >> instead it is an open network which is managed by its users >> >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6Obc_cJba4 >> >> RT's Sophie: The digital currency Bitсoin, once a toy for computer >> nerds, is now soaring in price, triggering a new gold rush. Is it just >> another bubble, or a glimpse into a radically different financial future? >> We ask Rick Falkvinge, CEO of BitCoin Cash and founder of the >> Swedish Pirate Party >> >> >> Two fine conversations covering crypto technological, social, >> political, monetary... worth passing on. > Let me guess. Yes, the above disclosed act of guessing would be precisely the case of all those who reply that have not watched the videos, further evidenced by their lack of quoting some actual content from them for discussion. So maybe we must guess the two that follow may mean possible general crypto areas of: A) Crypto investing? Perhaps must try to further divine what components were being thought of in the below note... > People who stand to make a ton of money out of it think its a > fabulous idea. Therefore investors investing in Google, or in the traditional stock markets, or in any other business venture, is also not a fabulous idea? Google exists to make tons of money [1], and stands to make tons of money out of any successful offering it makes in the cryptocurency space, therefore that would not be a fabulous idea? [2] Or is it that even late comers (adopters) to any investment that by many analysts (even now by Wall Street) is still expected to outperform other investments over various timeframes, would not be fabulous idea to still diversify into that? Or perhaps it is investing in things that use and rely on crypto, such as companies or crypto products, or even cryptocurrencies themselves, in particular any crypto that has no proof beyond powers of two odds estimates as to difficulty of attack, that would not be a fabulous idea? What about reviewing, talking about, publishing news of, advocating for, advertising, even believing in, crypto things, would that not be fabulous idea? [1] And by extension it's founders boards of directors, executives, shareholders and investors, including both retail and employee stock purchasers, employee wage earners, suppliers and customers, etc. [2] To wit, even Paypal and its ancient model made / makes tons of money. B) Decentral cryptocurrency tech / regulation / etc vs old world versions of same > Also, instant transfer? Oh really? Yes really, decentralized cryptos as a class are generally faster than most old world transfer schemes... even for each sub component of transfer such as: preparing to and winding down from send/receive, actual pushbutton transmission event to first visible ledger entry, through settlement / confirmation / guarantee of transfer / deposit periods, and any human / digital approval periods, required pre and post regulatory paper filings, taxes, etc.

1 0

[WAR] [RWN] Netanyahu quickly distances Israel away from DailyStormer comments
by Zenaan Harkness 28 Nov '17

28 Nov '17

Well well well, it's a tight nit relationship between Israel and The Daily Stormer which Netanyahu is wishing to distance himself from, as in literally - who knew that TDS could reach such “heights” as to be engaging Israeli media and politicians? What a world we live in ... Israel’s Deputy Foreign Minister Attacked by the Israeli Press for Agreeing with the Daily Stormer https://dstormer6em3i4km.onion.link/israels-deputy-foreign-minister-attacke… Lee Rogers Daily Stormer November 27, 2017 Last week I wrote an article on Israel’s Deputy Foreign Minister Tzipi Hotovely. The piece focused on her statements admitting that few Jews who live in the United States actually serve in the military, a fact that we here at the Daily Stormer have routinely pointed out. This is an inconvenient fact for the Jews because the American military has been fighting endless wars to benefit Israel. Jews are largely content to let the goyim fight wars on their behalf while they sit back fat and happy. She was roundly criticized by her fellow tribesmen for the remarks. They lashed out at her because she was stating actual truth about the situation. Now the Israeli press is unjustly attacking her because my article thanked her for exposing this truth. See also from the Jerusalem Post: http://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Neo-Nazi-site-thanks-deputy-FM-for-admitting-… Deputy Foreign Minister Tzipi Hotovely may have been sharply rebuked by Israeli and Jewish world officials last week for her now-infamous statements disparaging American Jews for “failing to serve in the military,” but her words did win her some fans. The neo-Nazi website The Daily Stormer on Thursday featured a column by Lee Rogers applauding the Israeli politician for “admitting” to a fact that has long been a stereotype touted by the extreme Right. “An Israeli diplomat just admitted a very inconvenient fact,” he wrote on the site. “Few Jews living in the United States have ever served in the American military. Considering that America has been fighting all sorts of insane wars for Jews and Israel, this is not something they want people talking about.” “It’s not a surprise to see how Netanyahu quickly distanced Israel away from these remarks. The last thing the Jews want are the American people waking up to the fact that they’re fighting wars for them even though few Jews serve themselves,” Rogers wrote. ...

2 1

Cryptocurrency: Rubin Report with Roger Ver, plus Rick Falkvinge on RT
by grarpamp 27 Nov '17

27 Nov '17

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6NscwzbMvI Rubin Report: Roger Ver (Bitcoin Investor) joins Dave to discuss Bitcoin 101. Bitcoin is digital money used for secure and instant transfer of value anywhere in the world. It is not controlled or issued by any bank or government, instead it is an open network which is managed by its users https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6Obc_cJba4 RT's Sophie: The digital currency Bitсoin, once a toy for computer nerds, is now soaring in price, triggering a new gold rush. Is it just another bubble, or a glimpse into a radically different financial future? We ask Rick Falkvinge, CEO of BitCoin Cash and founder of the Swedish Pirate Party Two fine conversations covering crypto technological, social, political, monetary... worth passing on.

1 0