- cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

arpanet anarchy!
by Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 29 Nov '20

29 Nov '20

According to the most crass agent on this list, the 'internet' is an 'anarchic' 'medium'. So I'm wondering which part of the arpanet, SORRY, which part of the 'internet' is the most anarchic? We can vote on it, and here are some candidates! 1) the part controlloed by amazon? https://nypost.com/2020/09/10/amazon-adds-former-nsa-chief-keith-alexander-… 2) the part controlled by shitflare, I mean, 'cloudflare'? 3) the part controlled by the joogle jews? 4) the part controlled by the fukerbook jews? 5) the 'backbone' controlled by ATT? 6) the DNS controlled by ICANN ? 7) add any other US corporate mafia here. OK, turns out that partial control of the aroanet is 'distributed' over a number of US mafias who, shockingly! are all in perfect synchrony. I guess it's the sort of voluntary cooperation one can expect from the anarchists at amazon and the anarchists at the NSA https://nypost.com/2020/09/10/amazon-adds-former-nsa-chief-keith-alexander-…

1 0

Zenaan Darkness and the "final solution"
by professor rat 29 Nov '20

29 Nov '20

Now this friend of the Daily Stormer is hopping into bed with the beast of Beijing - jimmy D. Quelle surprise. Hierarchies are forever according the learned Nazbol toad. How did these morons find an anarchist list to spread their fascist lies on? I blame Mongo and Rothbard - those two dead corpses.

3 2

Re: The friends of jamesd
by professor rat 29 Nov '20

29 Nov '20

James Dumbfuck sez... "...That is a Jew on Jew quarrel, more than it is a Jew on Muslim quarrel. Cosmopolitan Jews, the infamous international Jew, don't think Jews should have a nation. Muslims don't think anyone except Muslims should have a nation. Why should anyone else care? ..." Antiwar types should care - even your bum-buddies in Beijing should care if they don't want their belt and road mussed. But none of your Nazbol bum-buddies need care since no one cares about them.

2 1

The friends of jamesd
by professor rat 29 Nov '20

29 Nov '20

James Dumbfuck Donald "... The constitution proscribes a federal state Church, but allows the several states to have their several state Churches, an unstable arrangement which predictably failed to survive. State and Church always wind up in each other's arms. If you officially do not have a state religion, you have an unofficial state religion, which is considerably worse..." If you live in Amerikkka, its not good enough for you, Dumbfick.

1 0

Low flat hierarchies
by professor rat 29 Nov '20

29 Nov '20

Yasha Levine, BS? The Nazbol Turd that alleged a key fascist plot centered in Silicon Valley then went on to blow the lid off...the pistachio industry? That degenerate National-Bolshevik moron? Let me save folks the bother with a couple of KGB quotes. JULIAN " the most dangerous facilitator of totalitarianism we have ever seen. The internet is a threat to human civilization " ASSANGE 2012 "The Internet first appeared as a special CIA project, and this is how it's developing," - Russian KGB agent. Vladimir Putin

1 0

The friends of jamesd
by professor rat 29 Nov '20

29 Nov '20

ZENDY seems remarkably well informed ( probably lives in the smartest place on whatever continent he's domiciled in ) But I'm curious what his friends at the Daily Stormer think. Do they all agree with you Zenaan? I've seen some oppose Israel and some support it, for example. Which camp are you in on that?

4 4

Low flat hierarchies
by professor rat 29 Nov '20

29 Nov '20

"... technology escapes the intentions of its makers. The precursor and backbone of today’s Internet, ARPANet, was created in the late 1960s with the immediate objective of enabling communication between academics but more broadly as part of a strategy to enable U.S. military communications to survive in the event of nuclear war. Decentralization was introduced to prevent decapitation. However, the enduring result of ARPANet was the decentralized peer-to-peer network it created. It was TCP/ IP’s reliability, easy adaptability to a wide range of systems, and lack of hierarchy that made it appealing for civilian use. The hard-wiring of decentralization into the Internet’s technological platform created unintended consequences for the U.S. government — as far as enabling groups that threaten it also to enjoy communication networks that cannot be decapitated. The Internet is also attractive to anarchists because its architecture enables a communistic informational economy. FROM https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/uri-gordon-anarchism-and-the-politi… JULIAN " Capitalism+atheism+feminism = sterility " ASSANGE. 2017 Tell us more about your opposition to capital, BS. Por Favor.

2 1

Low flat hierarchies
by professor rat 29 Nov '20

29 Nov '20

19 years ago I wrote at Indymedia " Did Bin Ladin go to Harvard Business school? All that stuff about Global Branding, Just-in-time production and the importance of a low, flat organizational hierarchy? " Now here we are on an anarchic medium - and a crypto-anarchist list - talking about...how its impossible to ever get rid of all hierarchies? Funny how stupid reactionaries think even the most milquetoast reform is " WILDLY UTOPIAN! " The serious point here is we have to radically minimize all hierarchies if we are ever to stand a chance moving out into the galaxy. Centralized trusted bodies are serious points of weakness these days, and the first thing any hostile xenomorph will be looking for. Anarchist don't have to eliminate hierarchies any more than they have to eliminate violence. All we have to do is minimize them. Its political-economy not quantum-fuckin'-gravity.

2 1

Hackaday: Literally Tearing Apart A SpaceX Starlink Antenna
by jim bell 29 Nov '20

29 Nov '20

Hackaday: Literally Tearing Apart A SpaceX Starlink Antenna. https://hackaday.com/2020/11/25/literally-tearing-apart-a-spacex-starlink-a… Phased array antenna!

3 2

James A. Donalds cowardly and stupid lies exposed
by professor rat 29 Nov '20

29 Nov '20

Jamesd thought he could justify wage-labor, factory discipline and hierarchic management by noting that they’re imposed in Leninist regimes as well as under capitalism. Would he accept the same argument for the necessity of repressive sex and drug laws? Like other libertarians, he's is uneasy — hence his gratuitous red-baiting — because libertarianism and Leninism are as different as Coke and Pepsi when it comes to consecrating class society and the source of its power, work. Only upon the firm foundation of factory fascism and office oligarchy do libertarians and Leninists dare to debate the trivial issues dividing them. Toss in the mainstream conservatives who feel just the same and we end up with a veritable trilateralism of pro-work ideology seasoned to taste. James, who never has to, sees nothing demeaning in taking orders from bosses, for “how else could a large scale factory be organized?” In other words, “wanting to abolish authority in large-scale industry is tantamount to wanting to abolish industry itself.” Jimmy Dumbass again? No, Frederick Engels! Marx agreed: “Go and run one of the Barcelona factories without direction, that is to say, without authority!” (Which is just what the Catalan workers did in 1936 )

3 2