- cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

Cognitive Warfare, Neuro Weapons, Mind Domain
by grarpamp 23 Nov '21

23 Nov '21

https://smashleft.com/documents/Cognitive%20Warfare.pdf https://www.lachainehumaine.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/du-cluzel-guerre… https://www.innovationhub-act.org/sites/default/files/2021-01/20210113_CW Final v2 .pdf Executive Summary As written in the Warfighting 2040 Paper, the nature of warfare has changed. The majority of current conflicts remain below the threshold of the traditionally accepted definition of warfare, but new forms of warfare have emerged such as Cognitive Warfare (CW), while the human mind is now being considered as a new domain of war. With the increasing role of technology and information overload, individual cognitive abilities will no longer be sufficient to ensure an informed and timely decision-making, leading to the new concept of Cognitive Warfare, which has become a recurring term in military terminology in recent years. Cognitive Warfare causes an insidious challenge. It disrupts the ordinary understandings and reactions to events in a gradual and subtle way, but with significant harmful effects over time. Cognitive warfare has universal reach, from the individual to states and multinational organi- sations. It feeds on the techniques of disinformation and propaganda aimed at psychologically exhausting the receptors of information. Everyone contributes to it, to varying degrees, con- sciously or sub consciously and it provides invaluable knowledge on society, especially open societies, such as those in the West. This knowledge can then be easily weaponised. It offers NATO's adversaries a means of bypassing the traditional battlefield with significant strategic results, which may be utilised to radically transform Western societies. The instruments of information warfare, along with the addition of "neuro-weapons" adds to future technological perspectives, suggesting that the cognitive field will be one of tomorrow's battlefields. This perspective is further strengthened in by the rapid advances of NBICs (Nan- otechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Sciences) and the under- standing of the brain. NATO's adversaries are already investing heavily in these new technol- ogies. NATO needs to anticipate advances in these technologies by raising the awareness on the true potential of CW. Whatever the nature and object of warfare, it always comes down to a clash of human wills, and therefore what defines victory will be the ability to impose a desired be- haviour on a chosen audience. Actions undertaken in the five domains - air, land, sea, space and cyber - are all executed in order to have an effect on the human domain. It is therefore time for NATO to recognise the renewed importance of the sixth operational domain, namely the Human Domain.

1 0

How the mighty Jim Bell has fallen
by professor rat 23 Nov '21

23 Nov '21

Since he scribbled his Associated Press magnum dopus - sorry - " Assassination Politics " essay, back in 95, Jim Bell has lowered his standards and left himself open to charges of hypocrisy. It now reads like a bog standard election-promises platform to be loudly brayed before the revolution then as quickly binned as Lenin's " State and Revolution ". I refer especially today to this ' Its not going to be ' Wild in the streets " or anything like that..." After Anarchopulco - and now Kenosha - we now know that it will be wild in the streets of Jim Bells global revolution. He now stand exposed as either a gross sectarian hypocrite of an anarchist ( Natural Rights anyone? ) or a common or garden liar. As bad as Craig Wright, Julian Assmange or Adam Backstabber. At least Nazi Nick Szabo had a girlfriend who could tell him what a fascist he was. Sadly, the misanthropic liar and wannabe murderer, Jim Bell, doesn't have a friend in the world. Or maybe thats the way it ought to be.

1 0

Anarchist justice systems
by professor rat 23 Nov '21

23 Nov '21

Not seeing any huge objection to the present system of trial-by-jury in places where that operates, I say, if it ain't broke - don't fix it. State-free, trial-by-jury is not incompatible with anarchism as I see it. Safe, legal and rare ( Sear " Malatesta - crime and punishment " ) Of course I'm often outvoted on these sorts of issues.

1 0

Death to Rittenhouse and James Dalton Bell
by professor rat 23 Nov '21

23 Nov '21

>The people who got shot were white allies to BLM and against the police shooting of an unarmed black man. And hundreds of people who DIDN'T get shot were also. "white allies to BLM and against the police shooting of an unarmed black man." Thanks to Jim Bell we can demonstrate and protest freely. Thanks for mansplaining that to us poor dumb no-nothings, Jim Bell. >Rittenhouse was there at the invitation of several right wing notices online and on the dark web. Are you sure about that? It seems as safe an inference as anyone could make. Maybe strong AI will even be able to prove this at the retrial. I don't doubt there were some "several right wing notices online and on the dark web.". But do you know for sure Kyle actually saw them? And are you sure that there weren't many other NON-right wing notices? Or will you declare that ANY such notice MUST have been "right wing"? As if you're claiming that no centrist or left-wing person could possibly want businesses in the neighborhood protected from rioting? That would be a terrible indictment of the morals and ethics of such people, huh? Centrist and left-winger business's are insured. Rightwingers are uniformly morons. Pretty simple math. >One of his defense witnesses ( supposedly with a media company called Real America's Voice and on Fox News a lot) was allowed to attack both BLM and ANTIFA in his testimony many times. What was the nature of that 'attack'? I don't watch FOX and Real America as closely as you - maybe you can mansplain it to us. >On the dark web, the racists, neo nazis and alt right are claiming this verdict a victory and a call to arms. Are you implying that nobody other than "racists, neo-nazis, and alt-right" say the verdict is a "victory,"? Fuck yes. Maybe a few degenerate morons might. Maybe. I saw the videos, and I think it's clear that three people were shot AFTER they attacked Kyle Rittenhouse, and they attacked Kyle KNOWING he was armed with a long gun. And the second and third people shot had been chasing after Kyle. Grosskreutz couldn't continue to lie, because he learned, 15 months before the trial, that his actions had been recorded. I think the charges actually brought were utter nonsense. The prosecutor was obviously pandering to the braying, threatening crowds. And during the trial, they couldn't find even one person to 'hang' the jury. All 12 agreed, not guilty. "He shouldn't have been there!" is not a valid, chargeable crime. Jim Bell <<< You're our resident jail-block lawyer J, so maybe you can explain ' judicial bias ' to us ignorant peasants. I think KKK Kyle should be found guilty of manslaughter in a properly instructed juvie trial and the judge in this case, strung up by the balls. And if you had any friends they would have staged an intervention for you after that Jeff Berwick fiasco. Get some professional help.

1 0

For any pro-Assmange dead-enders still on this list
by professor rat 23 Nov '21

23 Nov '21

Since mid-2013 your dead-beat hero has been a pentagon cheerleader. "... Mr Assange agreed that some level of privacy was necessary for the successful operation of the military ..." http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/drive/assange-i-can-rule-from-… JULIAN " ‘[The military] protects the sovereignty of Australia. It protects the independence of Australia.' ASSANGE July, 2013

1 0

New blog post: #PardonRealityWinner: Nov 23, whistleblower moves to 3 yrs supervised release
by Douglas Lucas 23 Nov '21

23 Nov '21

New blog post by me today. Tomorrow whistleblower Reality Winner moves to three years of supervised release with strict conditions (supervised release is the federal equivalent of parole nowadays) The post's 5 parts: 1) Refresher on Reality Winner, the document she leaked, and its implications 2) The surrounding discourse quickly analyzed 3) Links to good recent/ongoing media about Reality winner 4) Relevant Bureau of Prisons jargon defined 5) Menu of actions for the public to pick from to push for a pardon Here you go: https://douglaslucas.com/blog/2021/11/22/realitywinner-whistleblower-superv…

2 1

DEATH to Rittenhouse - Kyle Wanted Dead or Alive. Prefer Dead.
by professor rat 23 Nov '21

23 Nov '21

The people who got shot were white allies to BLM and against the police shooting of an unarmed black man. Rittenhouse was there at the invitation of several right wing notices online and on the dark web. One of his defense witnesses ( supposedly with a media company called Real America's Voice and on Fox News a lot) was allowed to attack both BLM and ANTIFA in his testimony many times. On the dark web, the racists, neo nazis and alt right are claiming this verdict a victory and a call to arms.

4 8

STONE, Jones and Bannon, oh my
by professor rat 23 Nov '21

23 Nov '21

Now all they need is Julian and it'll be like a Beatles reunion. https://www.palmerreport.com/analysis/roger-stone-and-alex-jones-now-face-a… Reposts not endorsements - added caveat for cretins

1 0

Hate the sinners - love the sin
by professor rat 23 Nov '21

23 Nov '21

Jan. 6 Committee Subpoenas Roger Stone And Alex Jones They may want to beef up their protective healthware with these two. HAZMAT.

1 0

Re: DEATH to Rittenhouse - Kyle Wanted Dead or Alive. Prefer Dead.
by professor rat 22 Nov '21

22 Nov '21

> > P.S. I like *good* boy Kyle very much! :-) > Thanks for completing your profile Stefan. So, authentic german nazi who likes murderers very much. You get a special 'cypherpunks' prize. You're welcome, Punk. BTW. If you don't mind, where do you get your information from when you do research on a topic, or do you have limited Internet access, due to sites blocked, etc.? Just curious. Best regards Stefan . . ." If I may interject, its safe to infer Punk Batshit see's himself as politically Left due to his political opposition to the political Right as represented here by Gramps. And I would go further and declare his sources of information Marxist due to their repeated antisemitism. Left fascists have come here before - James A. Donald and John Young to name two. Their primary sources of information are based on fanatical dogma mixed with conspiracy theory. " Noise " in a word. Noise we might try and filter out more instead of engage with and perpetuate ( Hi Karl ! ) As Durruti once said . . . " Fascism is not to be debated - it is to be smashed "

2 1