- cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

One Adam Twelve
by professor rat 06 Mar '22

06 Mar '22

See the man palely loitering with a lean and hungry look TMZ Rep. Adam Kinzinger Agrees with Sen. Lindsey Graham On Putin Assassination https://www.tmz.com/2022/03/04/adam-kinzinger-agrees-lindsey-graham-assassi… T'were done it t'was best done quickly

1 0

APster going viral
by professor rat 06 Mar '22

06 Mar '22

The long awaited APster launch enables us to open a conversation on NO-FLY-ZONES from below. Though weak at first these can only grow in reach and power also offering finer-grained controls as they expand. And when the filthy KGB state takes them as a threat, well we regard that as a merit. Free advertizing! Speaking of which . . . The UK Sun Rogue Russian generals should ASSASSINATE ‘demented’ Putin, security experts say… https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/17848968/russian-generals-kill-vladimir-putin/

1 0

More on Turkey-based anarchists
by professor rat 06 Mar '22

06 Mar '22

Turkey-based anarchists should be praised for demonstrating against the Russian attack on Ukraine under the conditions of their repressive state. And they should be commended for refusing to support either "side" of Russia or the U.S.-NATO, two imperialist forces. The Russian ;state "started" this war this time, but the U.S. is the biggest imperial power in the world and connected to all imperialist conflicts. Finally they are right to oppose the capitalist Ukrainian state, for all its claims of "democracy." However, they are weakening the cause of freedom by being neutral between the Russian aggressors and the people of Ukraine. These are mostly workers, farmers, local merchants, and poor people. They should be able to decide their own future, whether to be politically independent, what kind of social, political, and economic system they want, and so on. They do not want a foreign state to come in and forcibly rule them against their will. In the tradition of Nestor Makhno, anarchists should stand in solidarity with the Ukrainian people.

1 0

Don't kill anyone that isn't an FBI agent
by professor rat 06 Mar '22

06 Mar '22

Denver Post Online threats target Denver investigators - Anarchist says e-mails harmless; feds disagree By Jim Hughes - Denver Post Staff Writer Monday, July 07, 2003 - An anarchist using the online moniker “Professor Rat” has threatened the lives of two federal terrorism investigators in Denver, advocating that they “need killing.” The threats name an FBI agent assigned to the local multiagency Joint Terrorism Task Force and the government’s lead prosecutor of terrorism cases in Colorado. Although those who travel in the same online circles as Professor Rat say his provocations are not to be taken seriously, officials say they are concerned about the threats, which were sent to an e-mail listserv and posted on the Internet in April. “The recipients of the threats have no way to discern their validity,” said Jeff Dorschner, spokesman for the U.S. attorney’s office. "They cause fear and they disrupt lives, and it’s for that reason that they’re taken very seriously. “It’s more than the individual targets. It’s the families and those associated with them,” he said. That is the purpose of the postings, an Australian man who admits to using the Professor Rat name and to posting these kinds of threats saidin a telephone interview and a series of e-mails: To scare people out of working for the government. He refused to admit to any specific threat, to avoid prosecution, he said. He already is charged with making similar threats against police in Australia, according to the Victoria Police in Melbourne. Saying that his real name was Matt Taylor and that he was 48 years old, Professor Rat said he promotes a theory called Assassination Politics that emerged at the periphery of cyberanarchist circles in 1997. The concept is that of an online lottery in which people bet on a date that public figures will die. The implication is that the lottery “winner” likely helped arrange the death. Winnings would be paid in untraceable digital cash, which does not yet exist. The development of digital money, and encryption software restricting government’s ability to monitor Internet activity, are common goals among the online anarchists and libertarians known as “cypherpunks.” The ultimate purpose of Assassination Politics is to deter people from working for government agencies, corporate media outlets or institutions “beholden to the violence of the state,” Taylor said. Professor Rat also has threatened a University of Ottawa law professor, a columnist for The Boston Globe and a Cincinnati police officer. Many of those threats were posted to a listserv called Cypherpunks. The e-mail distribution network allows libertarians and anarchists interested in the tension between government oversight and individual liberty on the Internet to discuss those issues via e-mails that when sent to the listserv are distributed to all members. Dorschner would not say whether there was an investigation into Professor Rat, calling the matter an issue of “internal security.” The columnist for The Boston Globe, whose sin, in the eyes of Professor Rat, was to criticize civil libertarians for objecting to the Patriot Act of 2001, said he did not take the threat at all seriously. He learned of the threat only last week, when told of it by The Denver Post, he said. The Post is withholding the names of the subjects of posts by Professor Rat to avoid promoting any specific threats. “The way I see it, this kind of talk is pretty cheap on the Internet,” the columnist said. “This is something I would consider casual hate speech. This person didn’t send me an e-mail saying 'I’m going to kill you.”’ But officials in Denver see nothing casual about the statements, Dorschner said. In an interview, Taylor taunted the Denver officials named in the April 8 statement. “They’re welcome to come and get me extradited,” he said. “Here I am. Come and get me.” The Cypherpunks listserv is also where Jim Bell, an MIT-trained chemist and Washington anarchist who now is in prison for interstate stalking of federal agents, unveiled his Assassination Politics. He was convicted in 2001. Federal prosecutors in Seattle that year also won a conviction against Carl Johnson, a Canadian man accused of threatening federal judges and Microsoft founder Bill Gates by e-mail. Later in 2001, Thomas Wales, a federal prosecutor in Seattle, was shot to death. Though his death was noted on the Cypherpunks listserv, no connection to Assassination Politics has ever been made. The case remains unsolved. John Hartingh, spokesman for the U.S. attorney’s office in Seattle, declined to comment on Wales’ death. Taylor said his threats are intended solely as a rhetorical deterrent. “No one has to die,” he said. “All that has to happen is for people to accept the system.” If anyone Taylor threatened ever was assassinated, “I would totally reassess my involvement in it,” he said. “It would totally change the whole situation. Basically, I’m a nonviolent person.” The posts made by Professor Rat fall under a relatively new category of crime known as “cyberstalking,” said Jim Doyle, a retired New York City police sergeant who now works as a cybercrimes consultant for a Connecticut company called Internet Crimes. The statements made by Professor Rat constitute prosecutable offenses, he said. “The bottom line is what the victim feels,” he said. “Is the victim threatened? Is the victim alarmed? Hey, that’s a crime.” Eugene Volokh, a law professor at the University of California-Los Angeles and a First Amendment specialist, said the threats were probably criminal, given Taylor’s description of the purpose of Assassination Politics. But “in order to (prosecute), you have to get your hands on the guy,” he said. Most current Cypherpunks subscribers have set up their e-mail in-boxes to block any messages coming from Taylor, said Declan McCullagh, a reporter for the high-tech website CNET.com. He has subscribed to Cypherpunks for 10 years, he said. Taylor exists on the “radical fringe” of online anarchists, McCullagh said. “He’s routinely ignored and ‘kill-filed’ by just about everyone on the list. I’d be surprised if more than a small handful of people are reading his postings, let alone taking him seriously.” Taylor acknowledged that he does not not have much support in anarchist circles. “Most anarchists see what I’m doing as counterproductive. … I’m not exactly at the center of anarchism by promoting Assassination Politics, that’s for sure.”

1 0

Fwd: Bank.org | Emergency Review/Action
by Gunnar Larson 06 Mar '22

06 Mar '22

We made it. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> Date: Sat, Mar 13, 2021, 8:21 AM Subject: Bank.org | Emergency Review/Action To: Shah, Seema (DFS) <seema.shah(a)dfs.ny.gov> Cc: dfs.sm.DfsNext <DfsNext(a)dfs.ny.gov>, Joshua Plant <joshua(a)plantpr.com>, <innovation(a)dfs.ny.gov>, <VCLicenseQuestions(a)dfs.ny.gov>, Garvin, Sheila Y (DHR) <Sheila.Garvin(a)dhr.ny.gov>, Paasewe, Siaka (DHR) < Siaka.Paasewe(a)dhr.ny.gov> Ms. Shah: You will be happy to know of xNY.io's purchase of Bank.org. This is a friendly signal to an Emergency application that is making its way to DFS for the Superintendent's review and consideration. All the best, Gunnar -- *Gunnar Larson - xNY.io <http://www.xNY.io> | Bank.org <http://Bank.org>* MSc <https://www.unic.ac.cy/blockchain/msc-digital-currency/?utm_source=Google&u…> - Digital Currency MBA <https://www.unic.ac.cy/business-administration-entrepreneurship-and-innovat…> - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip) G(a)xNY.io +1-646-454-9107 New York, New York 10001 On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 1:49 PM Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> wrote: > Dear Ms. Shah: > > Attending each of the Tech Sprint “info-calls” and our subsequent email > correspondence, being denied Tech Sprint participation without context or > reply > <https://thecapital.io/article/tech-sprint--ny-department-of-financial-servi…> > leaves us in an awkward situation. The facility of the Tech Sprint offered > four “all day working sessions” along with two weeks of workshops for > problem solving issues like “marketplace manipulation.” > > > Moving on, and to properly close the Tech Sprint chapter from our > perspective, today's memo is a vehicle that aims to deliver the tool of a > “new-clean-slate” as foundation to our continued dialogue together. Yes, > xNY.io is very fond of the idea of our friendly regulatory future > relationships with DFS. > > Either way, xNY.io is under strict mandate of earning the Superintendent's > various approvals, thus leaving no room for us to wallow in Tech Sprint > blues. > > Tech Sprint Submission : A Design Mechanism to Report Digital Regulatory > Computer Crimes > > Today I briefly submit an outline of reporting innovation observations and > key concerns defined by the four Tech Sprint Problem Statements. Delivery > of this submission files xNY.io’s Tech Sprint participation as complete. > > The best hybrid virtual currency architecture and pioneering modern > innovation, xNY.io and the proposed “xNY” virtual currency is of > pedigree with foundational intentions beyond our counterparts xRP > (Ripple) and NEXO (Nexo.io). From our direct experience on the matter, xRP > and NEXO built entire global operations as direct/indirect BitLicensees > with intent to profit from various cross-border computer crimes > <https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/criminal-ccips/legacy/2015/01/1…> > such as market manipulation while being partially funded and/or directed > out of New York. > > - > > Virtual currency fraud is a serious problem for such a developed > country as the United States, whose bank regulators have drawn attention to > the increase of these crimes. Having discovered that an unregulated virtual > currency sphere (such as in Africa, or other developing markets) is very > popular among virtual currency fraudsters > <https://www.americanbanker.com/news/jpmorgan-chase-warns-of-upcoming-fine-o…>, > the New York State Department of Financial Services concluded that this > kind of regulatory fraud was threatening US national security. > - > > If the basic problem with crypto reporting innovation is monopoly > power, policy should address that issue directly. If the problem is a lack > of transparency and accountability in government activities, one should > find ways to open up the public sector to oversight from outsiders. If the > problem is an opaque and confusing regulatory structure, rules should be > simplified and clarified. > > > - > > As elegantly as possible xNY.io must strive to innovate beyond a > Laissez-faire attitude concerning the systems and processes in which > transactions between our peers are now free from (or, almost free from) any > form of economic/regulatory interventions such as the BitLicense lacking > cross-border regulatory logic concern. > - > > Ms. Shah, the BitLicense and bank innovation from the great state of > New York touches people on all continents on Earth, and it seems that if > given the opportunity, DFS would want to solve any market manipulation > matter through technology > - > > xNY.io underscores the need for reporting innovation specific to > virtual currency marketplace manipulation and/or other crypto cross-border > regulatory arbitrage frameworks directed out of New York that touching over > 1 billion people (as clearly detailed in the Earth_ID conditional > BitLicence application currently in DFS review). > - > > xNY.io is concerned that DFS has potentially ignored our interests > ensured through interpretations of specific provisions in the existing > national and supra-national legal framework (civil law, securities law, > bankruptcy law, international human rights law and civil rights law). The > Superintendent may now lead New York and the global virtual currency > industry in clarify the rights of the public and obligations of BitLicense > members engaged in the global virtual currency economy. > - > > This can be achieved through subtle action on “conditional > approvals” that are well earned from DFS review. > > > - > > BitLicense regulation must preserve a technology-neutral, > principle-based, non-discriminatory framework for the next generation of > modern New York virtual currency public policy, naturally to support > innovation within the limits imposed by overriding international public > interests. > > Our Tech Sprint participation was aimed at working through these matters > together in a structured setting. Being champions for the rights of our > future customers, it is xNY.io’s observation that DFS is not winning at > engaging technology and reporting processes specific to fostering civil > <https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/CVR>/human rights > <https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1R1ExVvx8uIibM_w5X3BjG4eTDbJH_oSC?us…>. > There should be no open question on where New York stands on any matter > concerning human and civil rights at home or abroad. > > About the Design Mechanism Behind our Tech Sprint Concept > > Ms. Shah, during our calls together, we discussed focusing on the listed > problem statement concerning “Marketplace Manipulation.” xNY.io is > concerned that these "Computer Crimes" are a marketplace manipulation > matter associated with current BitLicense architecture and subject to DFS > attention related to cross-border/international organized groups (that are > cyber-based in New York). > > Given the critical role that honest and fair dealing of virtual currency > is core to the BitLicense mandate, should admitted felons and serial > miscreants (aka New York banks) be allowed to further expand their racket > via global crypto regulatory arbitrage? > > xNY.io’s key definition of virtual currency computer crimes, is a > consistent message across markets. These crimes are relatively new, having > been in existence for only as long as Bitcoin has—which explains how > unprepared society and the world, in general, is towards combating these > crimes AND we see this as no fault of DFS and the original BitLicense > mandate (unless not resolved before end of 2021). Goldman Sachs’ MoneyGram, > NEXO, BitGo, Ripple and several BitLicensee connections profit daily from > virtual currency market manipulation computer crimes with cross-border > reach operating as a large syndicate group from lower Manhattan. > > Many DFS sanctioned BitLicencees today are very profitable enterprises and > they may straddle nationalities in ways that you never would have imagined. > xNY.io notes our relationship with xRP and NEXO as examples. > > - > > Ms. Shah, the jury is in and the NY-EU "CryptoBank '' regulatory > loophole is a case for virtual currency market manipulation affecting > computer systems and software (aka the Bitcoin blockchain) in Africa, > Europe and New York State at the very least... > - > > This activity is harming New York and xNY.io’s international > virtual currency computer systems, process and overall technology (as > outlined in the Earth_ID conditional Bitlicense application under DFS > review) ... > - > > xNY.io points to Ripple.com and Nexo.io as party to delaying > blockchain innovation AND possibly humanity as a whole only in the name of > profits of Goldman Sachs and associated bad actors > - > > For example, New York, Europe and Africa are connected by a freeway of > cross-border arbitrage frameworks. Due to easily exploitable laws in > developing countries, some BitLicensees straddle daily New York, Europe and > in Africa operations that evade detection and prosecution from law > enforcement. Our first “conditional BitLicense” application outlined this > matter in detail. > - > > xNY.io efforts to bypass this creatively, certainly pioneering > innovation and modern New York enterprise with opening CryptoBank and the > xNY virtual currency > > Keeping all this in mind with a positive/optimistic attitude, many agree > any best Tech Sprint design mechanism must have potential to innovate > virtual currency industry's reporting standards should (at the very > least...) aim to tackle computer crime and/or innovate beyond and strive to > meet a new level that is required to support the generation of a New York > international CryptoBank. > > Ms. Shah, in reality foreign regulators have repeatedly filed enforcement > actions against the largest banks on Wall Street for engaging in fraud and > rigging markets. Communicating it another way, NY-DFS may find xNY.io’s > approach exotic and/or fresh, but in reality our foreign regulators have > repeatedly enforced actions against (directly or indirectly) BitLicensees > now freely leveraging virtual currency frameworks to rig markets abroad > while being headquartered in New York. > > Computer Crimes (Cross-Border) and Modern BitLicense Regulatory Logic > > xNY.io seeks various approvals by the Superintendent to protect our > enterprise and overcome any and all unnecessary delay or further loss or > harm related to interstate or international transmission of threats > directed against computers and computer systems (aka the Bitcoin > Blockchain) and CryptoBank. > > New York banks’ traditional engagement of regulatory arbitrage has > overflowed the BitLicense and correspondingly is responsible for global > virtual currency marketplace manipulation computer crimes, some experts > debate if Goldman Sachs is a RICO concern. xNY.io is at various levels a > product of the best of New York banks domestically and internationally (New > York, Europe and Africa…) and as such chooses to innovate rather than > litigate. > > Given the inherent universal cross-border nature of virtual currencies, > there is no real good reason for New York firms under the BitLicense > mandate to manipulate other global markets via regulatory arbitrage. > Circumnavigating this problem is key to modern BitLicense logic > > - > > MoneyGram, for example banks customer fees spanning postal mail, a > telephone call, electronic mail, or through a other computerized messaging > service. Computer Crimes as a threat is no less a threat because it is > contingent, because the speaker does not intend or is unable to carry it > out because the threat was not directly communicated to the MoneyGram > customer as a target, or because the language used might be considered > cryptic or ambiguously not part of the current BitLicense mandate. > - > > Goldman Sachs’ legacy MoneyGram investment vs. direct correlation > between xRP and NEXO virtual currencies arguably covers many computer > crimes including wire fraud and cross-border marketplace manipulation. > - > > Additionally, xRP and NEXO operating as potential bad actors have > put the purity of blockchain systems, processes and pose purity risks to > exchange software as Dark Pools, from our direct experience on the matter. > - > > Over the last five years Goldman Sachs created layer upon layer > (MoneyGram, NEXO, xRP, BitGo) of BitLicense related disguises and > cross-border systems under potential conspiracy and plausible deniability > to computer crimes and marketplace manipulation. > - > > Our CryptoBank aims to elegantly side-step all this basing our > innovative operations in New York and winning necessary DFS approvals. > - > > xNY.io’s approach in seeking confidence in “reporting systems and > process” as a fundamental best practice that protects ourselves and our > customers from interstate or international transmission of threats against > computers, computer networks, and virtual currency data networks and their > programs. > - > > xNY, CryptoBank: xNY.io vs. Nexo.io and Ripple.com > - > > XNY, Cryptocurrency: xNY vs. NEXO and xRP > > Finally, and forever forgetting any sentiments about being denied Tech > Sprint participation, we encourage DFS to consider that the Tech Sprint’s > overall success is already a success from the xNY.io side. From our Tech > Sprint “marketplace manipulation” calls together ... DFS now has a > potential cross-border human/civil rights solution developed as a > "tech-based" response to the problem statement(s) that specifically > addresses both the threats of future damage AND the current cross-border > "computer crime" merry-go-round responsible for extortionate damage already > inflicted. > > Thank you, Ms. Shah! > > Next Steps … Onward! > > Surveying the best next steps, we hope DFS embraces the fact that xNY.io > has no other option outside of moving from low into high gear on the > journey of seeking various conditional approvals and beginning a long-term > regulatory relationship all at the will of the Superintendent's action. > > > - > > For all people on planet Earth, the question should not hinge on any > debate or worry that New York regulators are not taking market manipulation > seriously. > - > > xNY.io again has every right to earn conditional approvals with the > aim to serve billions of people as customers. PayPal, MoneyGram and > Robinhood had their chance, so did xRP … While now NEXO aims to further > leverage computer crimes at the expense of New York and the BitLicense. > > Our team in Europe, Africa and New York comes to DFS with an impressive > and sophisticated solution of xNY.io to evolve up and innovate beyond > whatever roadblocks stand in our way. Moreover, we look forward to doing > all this in collaboration with DFS while fostering meaningful contributions > to the legacy of New York (if nothing else, via evergreen State tax > contribution). > > - > > xNY.io will be submitting a new/updated folio for DFS review and > hopeful consideration of "conditional approval(s)" by the Superintendent > over 2021. The new application is remarkably revolutionary … Including wise > architecture for DFS and xNY.io to leapfrog cross-border computer crimes > efficiently as foundation to CryptoBank and the xNY virtual currency being > an elegant solution as the world deserves > - > > Note, xNY.io aims to privately seek DFS' signal, through a series of > upcoming private conversations together … Given many good reasons, DFS has > a historic opportunity to signal sentiments on xNY.io’s new “conditional > approval(s) on the viability spectrum on/before the DFS Tech Sprint's > public 12 March "demo day" awards party. > - > > This way, everyone wins … New York and the world is watching, let’s > deliver what is deserved over 2021 via innovation that xNY.io can deliver > in various forms with DFS regulatory oversight controls. > > xNY.io’s obvious consequences on the emotional level are associated with > economic risks, directly linked to the obligation and respect to the > institution of CryptoBanking and/or DFS as the regulatory body from which > xNY.io entrepreneurship and innovation are required to interact. Every > effort has been made to offer DFS the best possible scenario to advance > xNY.io’s successful review while planting the seed for historic > contributions to New York State and lead virtual currency CryptoBank > innovation worldwide. > > Ms. Shah, please keep a lookout for xNY.io's updated “conditional” > application materials concerning our good natured enterprise for DFS’ > corresponding review with hopeful 2021 approval(s). Let nobody stop us. > > > Please let me know if you or the DFS team has any feedback. > > Wishing you the very best Tech Sprint! > > All the best, > > > Gunnar Larson > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 6:29 AM Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> wrote: > >> Dear Ms. Shah: >> >> I hope you are doing well. >> >> This memo is to kindly ask for your review and/or reconsideration, and >> ultimately seeks the esteemed Superintendent's permission to participate in >> the upcoming Tech Sprint and corresponding workshop events beginning next >> week. >> >> My application exceeds the Tech Sprint's participation criteria on >> various levels. Further, from our last correspondence on ethics/legal on >> January 28th (below), combined with the background of several intro calls >> with the DFS team related to excitement of participating in the Tech >> Sprint, it seems that perhaps a simple mistake was made on the >> application's approval. >> >> *The Tech Sprint focuses on virtual currency innovation concerning >> reporting standards:* >> >> - Please trust with certainty, myself and the xNY.io team hold >> nothing more than respect for DFS and understand we are at the will of the >> Superintendent. >> - Further, I sumit for the Superintendent's consideration, any >> institution or organization, which sponsors or conducts a contest or >> exhibition (*aka Tech Sprint*), and advertises or bills such contest >> or exhibition as a New York state championship contest ("*The event >> will end with an awards ceremony to celebrate the winning teams..."*) or >> uses the words "New York state" in its announcements ("*https://www.dfs.ny.gov/techsprint >> <https://www.dfs.ny.gov/techsprint>"*) is subject to equal rights of >> public accommodation. >> - Ms. Shah (and, please do correct me if I am mistaken), at base >> level standards, civil and political rights are a class of rights that >> protect individuals' freedom from infringement by governments, social >> organizations, and private individuals. They ensure one's entitlement to >> participate in the civil and political life of society and the state >> without discrimination or repression. >> >> Given many factors, I am concerned my application being denied to >> participate in the Tech Sprint has been a simple mixup as the only >> plausible scenario. Today's memo seeks to freely navigate the process of >> being granted Tech Sprint participation approval without delay. I would >> like to clear this up any confusion on the matter today, if possible. >> >> Greatly looking forward to hearing your thoughts and approval for the >> Tech Sprint's workshop participation. >> >> Warm regards, >> >> Gunnar >> -- >> *Gunnar Larson - www.xNY.io <http://www.xNY.io> * >> MSc >> <https://www.unic.ac.cy/blockchain/msc-digital-currency/?utm_source=Google&u…> >> - Digital Currency >> MBA >> <https://www.unic.ac.cy/business-administration-entrepreneurship-and-innovat…> >> - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip) >> >> G(a)xNY.io >> +1-646-454-9107 >> New York, New York 10001 >> >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 3:56 PM dfs.sm.DfsNext <DfsNext(a)dfs.ny.gov> >> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> >>> >>> Thank you for your interest in the Techsprint. Unfortunately, at this >>> time, we are not able to extend you an invitation to participate. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thank you again for applying. >>> >>> >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> DFS Next >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *DFSNext* >>> >>> >>> >>> *New York State Department of Financial Services* >>> 1 State Street, New York, NY 10004 >>> >>> www.dfs.ny.gov >>> >>> >>> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: *Shah, Seema (DFS)* <Seema.Shah(a)dfs.ny.gov> >> Date: Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 6:14 PM >> Subject: RE: TechSprint >> To: Gunnar Larson <gunnar(a)mydr.co> >> >> >> Hi Gunnar, >> >> >> >> I would totally appreciate you inviting the folks in your network >> mentioned below! You can craft something, but I’m just including a brief >> template that you can edit/modify as you see fit. And I don’t handle the >> ethics checks, but I really don’t anticipate any challenges coming from >> that for anyone. We should have an update on those by next week, so please >> stay tuned! >> >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> Seema >> >> *Seema B. Shah* >> >> Assistant Deputy Superintendent, Innovation >> >> seema.shah(a)dfs.ny.gov | www.dfs.ny.gov >> >> >> >

1 0

Revolutionary defeatism in Belarus
by professor rat 05 Mar '22

05 Mar '22

Wikileaks, sorry, Belarus has failed to show up in Ukraine https://www.palmerreport.com/analysis/is-putin-beginning-to-lose-belarus-to… Next thing you know Israel Shamir will be joining the Azov Battalion. ( Reposts not endorsements )

1 0

No-fly-zones from below
by professor rat 05 Mar '22

05 Mar '22

In the spirit of the Makhnovista perhaps all Russian pilots could be doxxed and bounties placed on their heads. Then there's innovative new ways of dealing with this type of war criminal. https://www.google.com/search?q=burning+Jordan+pilot&client=opera&hs=1sh&so…

1 0

Returning Kamchatka to Japan
by professor rat 05 Mar '22

05 Mar '22

Russian society has no history at all, at least no known history. What we call its history, is but the history of the successive intruders who founded their empires on the passive basis of that unresisting and unchanging society. The Russian commune (obshchina) is the natural basis for oriental despotism. Russia is a name usurped by the Muscovites. They are not Slavs; they do not belong to the Indo-Germanic race at all, they are des intrus [intruders], who must be chased back across the Dnieper.

1 0

Russian have a well-used evacuation route
by professor rat 05 Mar '22

05 Mar '22

Its called the Pooter. But I will say one thing on behalf of KGB comrade Vlad - he sure knows how to treat a Wikileaks supporter. https://www.google.com/search?q=sochi+pussy+riot&client=opera&hs=XwM&source…

1 0

FBI Agents Leak
by zeynepaydogan 05 Mar '22

05 Mar '22

FBI agents' information. Some of the assholes here might be on this list. No peace with government licks !

1 1