- cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

United States: Workplace Monitoring: New Duties In New York
by Gunnar Larson 12 May '22

12 May '22

United States: Workplace Monitoring: New Duties In New York: https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/employee-rights-labour-relations/119127… United States: Workplace Monitoring: New Duties In New York 10 May 2022 by Andrew Williamson (FordHarrison LLP) lus Laboris Beginning 7 May 2022, employers in the US state of New York will be required to notify and get written acknowledgment from employees if their electronic activity in the workplace is monitored. Employers often monitor employees for a number of reasons, including to ensure workplace policies and procedures are followed, to detect illegal behaviour such as trade secret theft, or to comply with regulatory obligations. As a result, many employers provide notice of electronic monitoring as a matter of practice, via their employee handbooks. However, due to amendments to the New York Civil Rights Law, New York employers are now required to explicitly notify employees if their electronic activity will be monitored and to obtain written acknowledgment from employees. The new law will see New York join Connecticut Delaware among the states requiring disclosure of workplace electronic monitoring. Which businesses and individuals are covered? The law applies to all private employers as it broadly defines 'employer' as any individual or entity, regardless of size, with a place of business in New York State. The law specifically excludes 'the state or any political subdivision of the state.' Notably, the law does not define 'employee,' making it unclear whether employers must provide notice and obtain written acknowledgment from individuals not considered employees (i.e. independent contractors or interns) but who nonetheless use the employer's monitored electronic systems. Also unaddressed is whether individuals hired by New York employers to work remotely out-of-state are entitled to the requisite notice. In the absence of guidance, it may be prudent for employers to extend notice to and obtain written acknowledgment from remote employees as well as other individuals who use the employer's monitored electronic systems. Which electronic monitoring activities are covered? The new law will apply to all private employers who monitor or intercept their employees' telephone conversations or transmissions, electronic mail or transmissions, or internet access or usage. Importantly, notice is not required for processes that are: designed to manage the type or volume of electronic mail, voicemail, or internet; targeted to monitor or intercept activities other than email, phone and internet activities; or performed solely for the purpose of computer system maintenance and/or protection. Accordingly, certain tasks such as spam filtering, proxy servers, or firewall protections in place merely to scan or block certain electronic transmissions are not covered. Similarly, because the law limits the notice requirement to email, telephone, and internet monitoring, surveillance by video cameras and location tracking should not be covered. What does the law require? In practice, the law imposes three requirements. First, it requires covered employers to provide employees with a notice of electronic monitoring upon hiring to all new hires. The law provides language akin to a model employee notice that employers may use, which states: '[A]n employee shall be advised that any and all telephone conversations or transmissions, electronic mail or transmissions, or internet access or usage by an employee by any electronic device or system, including but not limited to the use of a computer, telephone, wire, radio or electromagnetic, photoelectronic or photo-optical systems may be subject to monitoring at any and all times and by any lawful means.' Second, employers must also secure written acknowledgment from new employees that confirms their receipt of the notice. The notice can be provided, and the acknowledgment obtained, electronically. Note that the law does not require employers to provide notice to or obtain an acknowledgment from existing employees, though employers may choose to do so. Third, employers must also post a notice of monitoring in a 'conspicuous place which is readily available for viewing by [their] employees who are subject to electronic monitoring.' Employers should post this notice where they post all other legally required, employment-related notices. Although the law does not define a 'conspicuous space,' employers with a remote workforce would likely satisfy this obligation by posting the notice on their intranet page or other company portal commonly accessed by employees, or as part of the log-in process to access the company's computer system. How will the law be enforced? The law is enforced by New York's attorney general. Violations of the law may subject employers to civil penalties of up to USD 500 for the first offence, USD 1,000 for the second offense, and USD 3,000 for the third and each subsequent offence. There is no private right of action. The law does not specify whether the failure to notify an employee and the failure to obtain the employee's acknowledgment are separate violations. Next steps for covered employers Businesses with employees in New York should take steps now to comply with the law's requirements. Specifically, organisations should update their onboarding policies and procedures to ensure all new hires receive the required notice and execute the necessary acknowledgment. This includes identifying how new hires will be given notice and the collection and storage of acknowledgment forms. Further, employers should determine where the notice will be posted in the workplace, which may include their intranet sites or log-in portals. Employers should also review and, if necessary, update their employee handbooks to ensure existing monitoring policies reflect the law's notice requirements. Finally, although the law specifically applies to new hires, employers would be prudent to follow the same steps for existing employees subject to electronic monitoring before the effective date. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. AUTHOR(S) Andrew Williamson (FordHarrison LLP) lus Laboris ARTICLE TAGS United States Employment and HR Contract of Employment Employee Rights/ Labour Relations Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment IT and Internet Telecoms, Mobile & Cable Communications POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Employment and HR from United States An $890,000 Judgment? Why There's A Good Reason To Conduct A Wage And Hour Audit Sheehan Phinney Bass & Green In wake of recent ruling against NH restaurant company, it's time to review your firm's practices. Updated Federal Forms Part 2: I-9 Identification Documents Must Be Unexpired Dickinson Wright PLLC The Federal Government has updated some of its standard forms employers are probably used to seeing. Last week, we discussed the EEOC's addition of a gender marker option to its voluntary self-identification... Florida Limits Permissible Workplace Training On Diversity, Implicit Bias, And Systemic Racism Littler Mendelson On April 22, 2022, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signed into law so-called "anti-woke" legislation, amending the Florida Civil Rights Act and potentially limiting the ability of employers to include discussions of "implicit bias"... Employee Terminations: Breaking Up Is Hard To Do Akerman LLP Firing an employee can be much like breaking up with a significant other– stressful, messy, and awkward. No one wants to be the "bad guy," and oftentimes it feels kinder to sugarcoat... Amended Maine Law Will Require Vacation Payout When Employment Ends Littler Mendelson Maine's governor recently signed H.P. 160 - L.D. 225, amending the state's final wages statute to require that "[a]ll unused paid vacation accrued pursuant to the employer's vacation policy on and after January 1, 2023 must be paid to the employee on cessation of employment. How To Avoid Trade Secret Liability When Hiring New Employees IR Global The Great Resignation may be past its peak in 2022, but companies across all sectors are struggling to fill openings without sacrificing their standards. RELATED CONTENT Article Tags United States Employment and HR Contract of Employment Employee Rights/ Labour Relations Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment More Tags Mondaq Webinars - Rimon Falkenfort - articlead (12.04-17.05) Similar Articles Powered by mondaq AI MATCH 70% New York's New Notice Of Electronic Monitoring Goes Into Effect On May 7, 2022 Littler Mendelson 68% NY Employers Who Conduct Electronic Monitoring Of Employees Must Provide Written Notice To New Hires Starting May 7 Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP 84% New York Will Soon Require Employers To Disclose Employee Monitoring Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP 80% New York Law Requires Notice Of Employees' Electronic Monitoring Effective May 7, 2022 Holland & Knight 80% Six Things To Know About New York's New Employer Notification Requirements For Electronic Monitoring Of Employees Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart Related Articles New Overtime Requirements For Oregon Agricultural Workers Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP New York State To Fund Bonuses For Certain Healthcare Workers As Part Of State Budget Proskauer Rose LLP Illinois Publishes Additional Guidance On Equal Pay Registration Certificate Requirement Cooley LLP New Florida Law Addresses Employee Training In The Workplace Duane Morris LLP NYC Mayor To Hold Hearing On City's Salary Disclosure Law Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart Mondaq Webinars MAY 18 German State Aid – Will Mass Insolvency Be Next? RIMON FALKENFORT Partnerschaft von Rechtsanwalten & Steuerberatern mbB Webinar Frankfurt am Main Germany MAY 18 Maltese and Global Shipping Tax Perspectives KPMG Malta Webinar Pieta Malta More Webinars Comparative Guides Anti-Corruption & Bribery Artificial Intelligence Aviation Finance Aviation Regulation Banking Regulation More Guides Mondaq Advice Centres United States Telemarketing United States International Trade and National Security United States Advertising and Marketing United States COVID-19 Global Trademarks in SAARC Countries More MACs Curated Content Mediating Employment Disputes: Between A Clock And A Hard Case JAMS The Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act & The Future Of Forced Labor Enforcement Braumiller Law Group, PLLC Forced Labor Initiative Among ‘Tough Stance' On China For 2021 Braumiller Law Group, PLLC Upcoming Events JUN 09 Labor & Employment Spring Update Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton Webinar Los Angeles United States JUN 22 Jury Selection In Employment Litigation: Preparing For Voir Dire, Identifying Bias, Leveraging Strikes Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton Webinar Los Angeles United States Region / Country More filters Mondaq Social Media About | Blog | Contact Us | Contributors | Feedback | Free News Alerts | T&Cs |Unsubscribe | Your Privacy © Mondaq® Ltd 1994 - 2022. All Rights R

1 0

Please don't bother people.
by ZEYNEP AYDOĞAN 12 May '22

12 May '22

I subscribed with this email address I sent to this list a long time ago.Only posts from this listing (i forwarded it as a spam email). I've been trying to discuss something with my professor with this email address for the past few hours but I've been getting subscribe/unsubscribe requests from the list for a few days.I've received a lot of emails in the last few hours, and I realize that people here have been having these kinds of problems It's not just my email address. I have the same email in my other accounts that I have unsubscribed from :zeynepaydogan@proton.me, zeynepaydogan(a)protonmail.com. Whoever's doing this knows my this old e-mail : Please don't bother people. I got a lot of emails from here after I left the list, and I'll be back to everyone as soon as possible I would like to wish everyone to become more educated, smarter and ethical @zeynep

3 10

[ot][spam][crazy][personal] trying to do things
by Undiscussed Horrific Abuse, One Victim of Many 12 May '22

12 May '22

0441 there's a strangeness in the email I sent with a chart, the top y coordinate is 16 rather than 17. I think maybe the first datapoint is unshown due to an error. it's hard to address. it's so hard, it seems more important to just try to do stuff in general.

1 7

Ukraine Bio Labs Slides and PDF
by Digitalfolklore 12 May '22

12 May '22

Slides from Russia investigation into Bio Labs in Ukraine Links to April releases in vid box https://archive.org/details/lpr-tuberculosis/DPR%20laboratories/ and the slides https://archive.org/details/slide-5_202205

1 0

Technocratic consortium ID management Vs cryptoanarchy
by professor rat 12 May '22

12 May '22

I forgot to apply an old heuristic to the recent ID news from Google, Microsoft and etc. That is if it worries the powers-that-be or not. For revolutionists this is an infallible method. No one from the NSA appears to have threatened to run-over anybody yet so its a safe bet this latest move doesn't threaten them. Unfortunately. KILL the PRESIDENT! ( My 200 sats )

1 0

Cryptocurrency: Backed By What Exactly
by grarpamp 12 May '22

12 May '22

The Problem With Money Authored by Charles Hugh Smith http://charleshughsmith.blogspot.com/2022/05/the-problem-with-money.html I'm simply pointing out "money" isn't simple, and "backing money with X" leads to questions about the nature of "money," collateral and the fluidity and complexity of the social construct we call "money." The problem with money is it isn't just one thing. We think it's one thing because we use it to buy things, but it's actually a bunch of different things. This is why I often refer to it as "money:" in other words, one of the class of things that are stores of value, transactional grease, debts and various other bits and pieces. Recall that "money" is not a fixed class of things; it is a social construct. People agree to use (or are forced to use) something to transact tax payments, debt payments, stores of value, etc. "Money" only has value in a socio-economic system that is a social construct with social contracts and power relations. Everyone wants to pin down what money is, but it isn't that easy. Money stock in the U.S. is called M2, which is basically the total of cash in accounts. On the chart of total debt below (TCMDO), courtesy of the Federal Reserve St. Louis database (FRED), I've noted M2 is currently $21.8 trillion. Is this all the "money"? No. If you own a Treasury note or bond--debt issued by the federal government-- or a bond issued by a state or local government agency, you can sell that debt instrument fior cash. All government debt instruments are also "money." So are private-sector debt instruments. If you own a corporate bond or shares in a mortgage-backed security, you can sell those debt instruments for cash and buy whatever you want--or pay your taxes. Notice how "money" expands. This isn't just from the Treasury printing currency bills, or issuing new bonds, or the Federal Reserve creating "money" out of thin air to buy those Treasury bonds, it's also government agencies issuing bonds, corporations issuing bonds, mortgages on real estate being originated, student loans being issued, auto loans being originated, etc. Note that all this debt "money" is backed by some sort of collateral. It might be a tangible object like a house on a parcel of land, or it might be the income stream from a government, corporation or individual. Let's say we want to back all our "money" with gold. Which kinds of "money" do we back with gold? All of it, or just M2? If we only back M2, i.e. cash, then what's going to back the issuance of new "money" via mortgages originations, Treasury bonds, student loans, etc.? If not more gold, then what? You see the problem. There is $88 trillion in "money" and only $21.8 trillion in cash. If we only back the cash (which also expands--see chart below), then what backs the rest of the "money" when people sell their bonds, etc.? There was about $7.5 trillion in M2 "money" in 2008. Now there is about $22 trillion. If we're backing that "money" with gold, do we triple the number of ounces of gold we hold to back the cash, or do we dilute the amount of gold backing each unit of currency by holding the same amount of gold? Do we limit the issuance of debt based on collateral? In other words, do we limit new loans to M2 cash, meaning any lender that wants to issue a mortgage has to have all the cash in hand? Dp we limit corporations from issuing debt to the cash they have on hand? If we allow the expansion of "money" based on collateral, then how do we back such a rapidly expanding stock of "money"? If we grant that collateral "backs money," and that income streams are a form of collateral, then why do we need to "back money" with gold or anything else? If we back a quarter of "money" with gold and let the rest float on the value (i.e. supply and demand for) collaterized "money," then we have two forms of "money": cash which can be converted to gold in some sort of unit-for-unit conversion and all other forms of "money" which aren't backed until they are converted to cash. So what happens when people sell half the collateral-based "money" to convert it into cash? The supply of cash increases, while the stash of gold backing cash stays the same. What's the value of the cash measured in gold, given that each unit of cash now has a smaller claim on the gold stash? Backing "money" with tangible things like gold sounds like a splendid solution to problems like inflation, but it comes with knotty questions about exactly what counts as "money," what "money" is actually backed, and how is this "money" backed if it cannot be converted into whatever is backing it-- gold, wheat, land, shares in a corporation, etc. Consider a mortgage. The mortgage is debt backed by the collateral of a house on a parcel of land. The house and land "back" the new "money" created when the mortgage is originated. When I pay off the mortgage, I'm converting my cash "money" into what "backed" the "money": a house and parcel of land. In other words, I converted cash into what "backed" the money: a house. If gold "backs" money, then it's only actually "backing" money if I can convert my cash into gold, just as I can convert cash into a house by paying off the mortgage. If we discount collateral as "backing money," then what sort of financial system and economy do we have? Is collateral not a worthy "backing" of "money"? If not, why not? Why is a house and land not worthy of "backing money" any more than gold? And if I can't convert my cash into gold, then what is backing my cash? Wouldn't I be better off with "money" that can be converted into collateral I can use such as a house than "money" I can't actually convert into anything? These questions upend conventional beliefs about "value," "backing money with X" and convertibility of collateral and "money." Am I proposing an answer to these knotty questions? No. I'm simply pointing out "money" isn't simple, and "backing money with X" leads to questions about the nature of "money," collateral and the fluidity and complexity of the social construct we call "money."

1 2

Cryptocurrency: Cubans Route Around Sanctions
by grarpamp 12 May '22

12 May '22

Among handful of other small countries going crypto... 100,000 Cubans Are Using Bitcoin In Response To US Sanctions https://bitcoinmagazine.com/business/100000-cubans-are-using-bitcoin-in-res… https://bitcoinmagazine.com/.amp/culture/cubas-bitcoin-revolution http://cubastudygroup.org/about-us/mission-beliefs-approach/ https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/cuba-approves-cryptocurrency-service… https://www.nbcnews.com/now/video/cubans-turn-to-cryptocurrency-amid-heavy-… A report from NBC states over 100,000 Cubans are using bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. The adoption of cryptocurrencies was driven largely by mobile internet access which was only provided to Cubans three years ago. The need for sovereign monetary technology spawns from sanctions placed against Cuba preventing the use of international standards of money. Cuba is embracing bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies in response to burdensome U.S. sanctions, according to a report from NBC News. There are reportedly 100,000 Cubans currently using cryptocurrencies which is largely thanks to the introduction of mobile internet access that was only provided three years ago. One particular cafe owner named Nelson Rodriguez was interviewed by NBC due to his acceptance of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. In explaining what made Rodriguez decide to accept a new form of payment he stated “I like crypto because I believe in the philosophy.” The philosophy Rodriguez is likely referring to is the idea that money should be sovereign, meaning that it should belong to those who have earned it, and also that money should not intentionally devalue over time. These particular ideals have clashed with both the local government of Cuba, and international sanctions often placed by countries such as the U.S. on Cuba. PayPal, Revolut, Zelle and many other forms of internationally accepted forms of credit or debit cannot be used by Cubans due to sanctions banning the services. Many institutions such as JP Morgan and Deutsche Bank have reportedly faced multi-million dollar fines for providing services to Cubans. On April 27, Reuters reported that Cuba was approving cryptocurrency service providers, pending the receipt of a license from the central bank. A teacher at Colombia's Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali and former Cuban central bank economist, Pavel Vidal, reportedly stated: "If the central bank is creating a cryptocurrency-friendly legal framework, it is because they have already decided that it can bring benefits to the country.” Alex Gladstein, CSO for the Human Rights Foundation, wrote an article discussing many of the challenges the people of Cuba have endured. During the writing of said article, Gladstein interviewed a son of Cuban exiles and the executive director of the Cuba Study Group, Ricardo Herrero, to discuss the economic impact of sanctions for the Cuban people. Herrero referred to the embargo placed on Cuba as “the most rigid and expansive sanctions regime towards any society on the planet.” Cubans are now taking monetary ownership into their own hands.

1 0

Ynt: CIA MK Ultra The True Story of Julian Assange
by professor rat 12 May '22

12 May '22

So far my metaphor is holding up insofar as you are leaving and " Squid Vicious " is about to follow since he keeps ODing on his favorite narcotic - antisemitism Don't let the door hit you on the way out Z Its been real.

1 0

Re: CIA MK Ultra The True Story of Julian Assange
by professor rat 12 May '22

12 May '22

' . . . The Rat loved the Revevilgod, and they probably should be friends, or they could be co-workers.Because their governments don't love Assange.I understand that they are still butthurt because Assange has leaked the secrets of the governments . . . " If Evil God scribbled that Qanon, Catholic, Nazi gibberish then he qualifies as a Nazbol ( Marxist-communist-Nazi-fascist ) We would be mortal enemies. If he's propagating it like he believes it I declare him my enemy - albeit a self-destructive one. " Their governments " assumes facts not in evidence. I haven't voted since 1977 and its supposedly compulsory here. And there's no evidence Evil God has anything to do with govt. Unless its through Marjorie Taylor Greene. Assange said publicly he respects govt privacy. The onus is on his deadender Manson-like followers to explain comments like this . . . "... Mr Assange agreed that some level of privacy was necessary for the successful operation of the military ..." http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/drive/assange-i-can-rule-from-… JULIAN " ‘[The military] protects the sovereignty of Australia. It protects the independence of Australia.' ASSANGE July, 2013 Repeating a lie and hoping it will take is part of Marxist socialist and National socialist praxis. It should have no place in any self-respecting anarchists space. Nancy-Spungen, Zeynep A-hole is serial liar - like her Kadet- Nazi-Punk boyfriend . VICIOUS LIARS - GO FUCK YOURSELVES!

4 8

Fwd:Mailman privacy alert
by ZEYNEP AYDOĞAN 11 May '22

11 May '22

Like the others…. > An attempt was made to subscribe your address to the mailing list cypherpunks(a)lists.cpunks.org. You are already subscribed to this mailing list. Note that the list membership is not public, so it is possible that a bad person was trying to probe the list for its membership. This would be a privacy violation if we let them do this, but we didn't. If you submitted the subscription request and forgot that you were already subscribed to the list, then you can ignore this message. If you suspect that an attempt is being made to covertly discover whether you are a member of this list, and you are worried about your privacy, then feel free to send a message to the list administrator at cypherpunks-owner(a)lists.cpunks.org.

2 6