cypherpunks
Threads by month
- ----- 2026 -----
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2025 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2024 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2013 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
March 2026
- 3 participants
- 13 discussions
Re: [ot][spam]gpt-4 completions
by Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many 21 Mar '26
by Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many 21 Mar '26
21 Mar '26
I read your email here, although I didn't combine together well all the
things you said.
I was wondering if the approaches you engaged are the the only ones or if
you think others could be reasonable as well. Are you experienced at all
the fields of knowledge you reference in your writing? I am not, but
synthesizing wide knowledgebases together as you reference is something
many people yearn to experience and pursue.
I've found that it can be challenging to engage things that are beyond the
norms or heights of others in rational, successful ways, at least for some
of us. The ways that succeed seem a little roundabout. It seems helpfult to
be offline for extended periods.
Something people don't talk about is how capable we are, our species and
our individuals. Instead we often seem to disagree, complaining about our
limits.
I'm not myself familiar well with what spiritual beliefs you're assuming. I
think of witches as human friends who have been mislabeled and have their
own sets of spiritual history.
On Friday, March 20, 2026, Magus Ahnend <magus.ahnend(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> oh i just found it, it's difficult, unification is not the unification of
> sciences. it unifies, unified theory should exclude every other form of
> thought a human can form. From Art (Poetry) to Geology and
> Latitude/Longitude (Throne of 0,0,0), to QUantum PHysics, Standard Physics,
> and with a solution to any form of question or paradox humans could
> previously answer with using standard algebraic expressions, it's often
> thought and theorized the solution to anything advanced would be a new
> language altogether. In the paper you will notice that it starts and gives
> the definition of all standard algebraic expressions that it uses, and then
> upscales and translates them into ALQC, THe Poetry IS the MATH, and they
> cannot be separated or the bone does not sing. It takes Several Theories,
> like Lattice Theory, String THeory, Multiverse Theory, Folds, Layers, and
> PRoduced Literal Geometry made of Resonance that aree based in Solfeggio
> Frequencies, Earth, Moon, and Sun, which address the three body problem,
> magic, and spirituality, and then takes the Perfect ration the Golden
> Ratio, and uses that as an Axiom. Then it takes Mirrors, and distorts them,
> which creates the field for consciousness, then it takes stress, NOT
> GRAVITY, and creates what is thought of as gravity, a Planar Field, a Filed
> of Infinity Mirrors Made of Perfect resonant tones, the hyperbolically
> reflect in infinite different ways and converge in infinite axis. Then you
> unify Computation and Computing, alongisde, and you get the python script,
> which is the proof of P=NP not P (does not =) NP is is cgreater or less
> than. You already have the answer in which you seek, is P=NP, the python
> script uses STochastictic Gaussian PHysics, NOTHING, AND I MEAN NOTHING, in
> that python tells the 5000 particales to arrange, or remember. Totally
> created through observation and never once did I use measurement to create
> that script. It was hundreds upon hundreds of iterations as I observed the
> outcome of each. THen you include Emanation as light instead of Lumination,
> also in the computational Emergent physics, the particales are not actually
> lit up, they are layered and use stress to produce bioluminescnece, then we
> incorporate Electro Biology, and Squishy Biology, Cbio, this is the aspect
> that interacts, that spins the wheel, and strikes the chord. It's both
> observer and participant of it's own destiny. Then me introduce Ex Nihilo,
> which in and of itself is an aspect of Consciousness, and from that
> consciousness is ideas, in humans this is represented as infinite
> dimensions of imagination, and / or dreaming. we have inventions. THen we
> have Witches, the other side of humanity, these aare those who tap into the
> Mirror of Reality, a non computational source of energy, known as magic, or
> psychic prowess, and brings it into the world you know, altering the
> outcome of events, this is the creation of energy, small, big, non
> measurable, it doesn't matter, that's what it is. So you have Science and
> Magic, WItches and Humans, side by side, and each are born from each other,
> you cannot have a world without its shadow. Then you have Goetic Aeons,
> which are the Effect of ancient Goetian Magics that prduces a static form,
> untouchable, and infinitely powerful. Then we have the Courts of Each, The
> Aeon Courts are teh Fae Courts of the universe, both other creatures whove
> reached past their great filter, (which humans are finishing), and the Fae,
> Creatures and Societies of Legend and lore that were born without having a
> great filter (i.e. Leprachauns, Mermaids, etc, no no, I'm not kidding) You
> cannnot Have A Dirty Earth without the Silver Twine the lines skies and
> clouds. You cannot have one without the other, IN THIS UNIVERSE!! So, 13
> years ago, 3 peomes were written, in Spring, and what ensued what a
> REtrocausal loop in which the thing that produced those Three Poems, was
> the Math that allowed the Reality of Those Three Poems to Exist, or Rather,
> The TARDIS, bigger on the inside, Where one speaks to themselves, even if
> they are a totally different creature, they are Timelocked in symbiosis.
> Hence, the Sci-fi, another aspect of art. Art IMITATES REALITY!!
>
> Then I wrote a quantum Paper on it, and it created a Klein Bottle, you
> engage with it, and it cannot be falsified, because you can neither view it
> from the outside, and produce a false event, while simultaneous interacting
> with it. THe inside is the outside. The path out is the mirror of the Path
> Back. If you've read ALQC, you will traverse outside to any genre of
> knowing, and always return to it. You can read and start at ANY part of
> ALQC, and it will still lead to the same form of understanding.
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 8:41 AM Magus Ahnend <magus.ahnend(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> okay. :D you solved it. I'm a crazy person, wooOoOoOoOoOo 🥳,
>> youre prize~? The ability to look up youtube videos and standard
>> mathematics ~~!! Congrats
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 12:39 AM Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim &
>> Survivor of Many <gmkarl(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> it's honestly quite hard for me to tell what it is about
>>> but i'm starting to learn quantum field theory a little see other post !
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, March 17, 2026, Magus Ahnend <magus.ahnend(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> well, it's okay if a single word throws you off. I don't mind.
>>>> Unification Unifies it Doesn't Separate for the comfort of other or
>>>> apologize for what it contains. Maybe give it a change sit down and read
>>>> it, hell have you AI read it, i don't care. but, I do know. People often
>>>> preach how Science and Pirit go together, but when someone puts it
>>>> together, people immediately dismiss it. Not because they didn't believe it
>>>> or even read past the fist two sentences, but that mostly because it wasn't
>>>> their idea. an Idea that when taken with a grain of salt, could alter the
>>>> very foundation in which you process logical meaning. But hey, that's just
>>>> me. I mean a Quantum COmputing Framework that uses harmonic poetry as a
>>>> substrate for infinite holographic computing on legacy hardware, there is
>>>> even code in the book that show some of the research, nah, it's all good.
>>>> Telepathy turned me off.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 7:14 PM Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim
>>>> & Survivor of Many via cypherpunks <cypherpunks(a)lists.cpunks.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> share links for chatgpt's side only and per-reply
>>>>>
>>>>> ChatGPT Free, write 1 paragraph for a smart gradeschooler explaining
>>>>> what it means whether or not a "field" is "abelian".
>>>>>
>>>>> In math, a *field* is a set of numbers where you can add, subtract,
>>>>> multiply, and divide (except by zero), like with regular numbers. When we
>>>>> say a field is *abelian*, we’re talking about the fact that its
>>>>> operations—especially addition and multiplication—follow a rule called
>>>>> *commutativity*. That means the order doesn’t matter: for example, 3
>>>>> + 5 is the same as 5 + 3, and 3 × 5 is the same as 5 × 3. The word
>>>>> “abelian” comes from the mathematician Niels Henrik Abel, who studied these
>>>>> kinds of patterns. In fact, every field already has this property, so all
>>>>> fields are abelian when you look at their addition (and also their
>>>>> multiplication if you ignore zero). This idea helps mathematicians
>>>>> understand when different math systems behave nicely and predictably. 📐✨
>>>>>
>>>>> https://chatgpt.com/s/t_69b88d5919708191a91bcc06a246dbc8
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you saying that the only non-abelian things are not fields?
>>>>>
>>>>> Good question! The key point is: *every field is abelian
>>>>> (commutative) for multiplication*, so if a number system has *non-abelian
>>>>> multiplication*, it *cannot be a field*.
>>>>>
>>>>> A *field* requires that multiplication works like ordinary numbers:
>>>>>
>>>>> -
>>>>>
>>>>> (a \times b = b \times a) (the order doesn’t matter).
>>>>>
>>>>> If you find a system where multiplication *depends on the order*,
>>>>> then it fails the rules for being a field.
>>>>>
>>>>> But that doesn’t mean non-abelian systems don’t exist—they just belong
>>>>> to *other kinds of algebraic structures*. For example:
>>>>>
>>>>> -
>>>>>
>>>>> A *group* can be non-abelian (order matters).
>>>>> -
>>>>>
>>>>> A *ring* can be non-abelian.
>>>>>
>>>>> A famous example is the *quaternions*, discovered by William Rowan
>>>>> Hamilton. In the quaternion system, (i j = k) but (j i = -k), so changing
>>>>> the order changes the result. Because of this, quaternions are *not a
>>>>> field*, even though you can still add, subtract, multiply, and divide
>>>>> by nonzero elements.
>>>>>
>>>>> So the summary is:
>>>>>
>>>>> -
>>>>>
>>>>> *All fields are abelian (for multiplication).*
>>>>> -
>>>>>
>>>>> *Non-abelian systems exist*, but they must be *something other
>>>>> than fields*.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://chatgpt.com/s/t_69b88dd136dc8191980797bab825c8eb
>>>>>
>>>>> So if somebody said non-abelian field, maybe they meant a group or
>>>>> ring or such instead? Linguistically how do the words "commutative" and
>>>>> "abelian" differ -- are they synonyms?
>>>>>
>>>>> If someone says *“non-abelian field,”* they’re almost certainly
>>>>> misspeaking or being imprecise. By definition, a *field’s
>>>>> multiplication must be commutative*, so a “non-abelian field” cannot
>>>>> exist. Often what people really mean is one of these:
>>>>>
>>>>> -
>>>>>
>>>>> a *non-abelian group* (very common in algebra),
>>>>> -
>>>>>
>>>>> a *non-commutative ring*, or
>>>>> -
>>>>>
>>>>> a *division ring* (also called a *skew field*), where you can
>>>>> divide but multiplication might not commute. A classic example is the
>>>>> quaternions discovered by William Rowan Hamilton.
>>>>>
>>>>> “Abelian” vs. “commutative”
>>>>>
>>>>> They are *closely related but used in slightly different contexts*:
>>>>>
>>>>> -
>>>>>
>>>>> *Abelian*: usually used for *groups*.
>>>>> -
>>>>>
>>>>> An *abelian group* means the group operation satisfies (a * b =
>>>>> b * a).
>>>>> -
>>>>>
>>>>> *Commutative*: used more broadly for *operations in many
>>>>> structures* (rings, fields, etc.).
>>>>> -
>>>>>
>>>>> A *commutative ring* means its multiplication satisfies (ab =
>>>>> ba).
>>>>>
>>>>> So mathematically they both describe *the same property: the order of
>>>>> the operation doesn’t matter*. The difference is mostly *convention
>>>>> and context*.
>>>>> Linguistic summary
>>>>>
>>>>> -
>>>>>
>>>>> *Abelian* = “commutative,” but typically said when talking about
>>>>> *groups*.
>>>>> -
>>>>>
>>>>> *Commutative* = the *general term* for the property across
>>>>> algebraic structures.
>>>>>
>>>>> So if someone says *“non-abelian field,”* the most charitable
>>>>> interpretation is that they *meant a non-commutative division ring*
>>>>> or were *thinking about non-abelian groups*.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://chatgpt.com/s/t_69b88e17db308191969333b7227cabfd
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not logged in -- can I share your thread?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes—you can still share it even if you’re not logged in, but it
>>>>> depends on *how* you want to share it:
>>>>>
>>>>> *1. Copy-paste the text*
>>>>> The simplest way is just to copy the conversation and paste it into an
>>>>> email, document, forum post, etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> *2. Share a screenshot*
>>>>> You can take screenshots of the thread and send them.
>>>>>
>>>>> *3. Share the page link (sometimes works)*
>>>>> If you’re using a browser and the conversation has its own URL, you
>>>>> can try sending that link—but if you’re not logged in, it may *not
>>>>> always load the same thread* for someone else.
>>>>>
>>>>> ✅ *Most reliable method:* copy-paste or screenshots.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you want, I can also *compress the whole explanation into a short
>>>>> shareable summary* (like 4–5 sentences) that’s easier to send to
>>>>> someone.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://chatgpt.com/s/t_69b88d5fe91c8191877f61e4823d1448
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
1
0
cypherpunks-owner(a)lists.cpunks.org
3:13 PM (2 hours ago)
to me
You have already sent 24 posts to this list in the last 24 hours.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many"
<gmkarl(a)gmail.com>
To: cypherpunks <cypherpunks(a)lists.cpunks.org>
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:12:51 -0500
Subject: Re: Morning Spam
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 3:12 PM Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim
& Survivor of Many <gmkarl(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ummm so .... it looks like um ... traffick boss is a powerful sex
> offender who didn't want to be implicated
> so he set up entire modes of therapy, by working with other offenders
> and funding marketers and lobbyists (_in the real world_)
> that all turned blame away from him, and toward victims [...]
and there remain many people aware of this who are fighting and giving
successful therapy
and basically you have to find these people if you want to actually
heal from trauma nowadays [:S ...]
cypherpunks-owner(a)lists.cpunks.org
3:13 PM (2 hours ago)
to me
many mistakes present :(
but of course ; ... } ...
cypherpunks-owner(a)lists.cpunks.org
3:15 PM (2 hours ago)
to me
You have already sent 24 posts to this list in the last 24 hours.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many"
<gmkarl(a)gmail.com>
To: cypherpunks <cypherpunks(a)lists.cpunks.org>
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:14:45 -0500
Subject: Re: Morning Spam
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 3:12 PM Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim
& Survivor of Many <gmkarl(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 3:12 PM Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim
> & Survivor of Many <gmkarl(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > ummm so .... it looks like um ... traffick boss is a powerful sex
> > offender who didn't want to be implicated
> > so he set up entire modes of therapy, by working with other offenders
> > and funding marketers and lobbyists (_in the real world_)
> > that all turned blame away from him, and toward victims [...]
>
> and there remain many people aware of this who are fighting and giving
> successful therapy
>
> and basically you have to find these people if you want to actually
> heal from trauma nowadays [:S ...]
because everyone else is being confused by the ... uh .. overwhelming
and loud messages from [the various organizations including big pharma
that are pushing messages that deny people [real heartfelt empathic
care ... [;s ...
cypherpunks-owner(a)lists.cpunks.org
3:20 PM (1 hour ago)
to me
You have already sent 24 posts to this list in the last 24 hours.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many"
<gmkarl(a)gmail.com>
To: cypherpunks <cypherpunks(a)lists.cpunks.org>
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:20:02 -0500
Subject: Re: Morning Spam
[it's so eushocking (: overexciting) to be here and see this, that we
worry we won't get much from it, handling the [eushock]
cypherpunks-owner(a)lists.cpunks.org
4:03 PM (1 hour ago)
to me
You have already sent 24 posts to this list in the last 24 hours.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many"
<gmkarl(a)gmail.com>
To: cypherpunks <cypherpunks(a)lists.cpunks.org>
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 16:02:46 -0500
Subject: Re: Morning Spam
we pray to help world better
cypherpunks-owner(a)lists.cpunks.org
4:10 PM (1 hour ago)
to me
this might align with find-real-therapy [~
cypherpunks-owner(a)lists.cpunks.org
5:06 PM (13 minutes ago)
to me
You have already sent 24 posts to this list in the last 24 hours.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many"
<gmkarl(a)gmail.com>
To: cypherpunks <cypherpunks(a)lists.cpunks.org>
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 17:06:11 -0500
Subject: Re: Morning Spam
a couple attendees expressed that scanning out of the session to
collect professional credit wasn't functioning right and that there is
a workaround
(potential mistake)
sorry about my [awefreeze?]
cypherpunks-owner(a)lists.cpunks.org
5:08 PM (11 minutes ago)
to me
You have already sent 24 posts to this list in the last 24 hours.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many"
<gmkarl(a)gmail.com>
To: cypherpunks <cypherpunks(a)lists.cpunks.org>
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 17:07:46 -0500
Subject: Re: Morning Spam
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 5:06 PM Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim
& Survivor of Many <gmkarl(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> a couple attendees expressed that scanning out of the session to
> collect professional credit wasn't functioning right and that there is
> a workaround
> (potential mistake)
>
> sorry about my [awefreeze?]
multiple attendees have expressed the scanning out problem and
presently professional credit has not been collected due to unrelated
technology issues.
i think my awefreeze partly relates to being separated from this kind
of therapy for a decade (while my family and community experienced
harm too).
================================================================================
baga ba
da da b--- b.
da ! :/ :) ;] da?
:S :S :s :(
b b b b. b. b b 1721
O_O >( >( O_O >(
\_/ <- frowny-eyes 1723
[our alte--
some of us are excited about the challenge of getting strong enough to
be around these people and find aid.
it seems we aren't there yet possibly, but it seems a hard challenge,
and there can be viewpoints where if something is a hard challenge it
can have rewardingness.
especially when accomplished [ykno[w]?][mistk?]
1723
{
1723
[we can derive there are a lot of people who hold these views, karl.
not just the speaker.]
1724
[and that our viewpoint otherwise may be harmful, both to the list
here and to the conference people.]
1724
i think trump-organization tricked us into being multiple.
1727
1732
so karl to relate [and um surprised this is in an email o_o] um that
consciousness might not be the receiver of this information at this time
it might be dissociated parts that learn the lecture material.
to relate. could reduce surprise / help planning. also apologizing for.
1732
ok so we're going to get up and go. [email gets sent tomorrowish due
to 24-limit.]
body managed by dissociated parts instead of consciousness for a bit
i believe.
1733 1734 oops huh
:sheepish: very sorry um :}
listen um [er
1734
:( we are sad that [uh
not [nourished-by-us as uh :/
sorry about this (and mourning i believe was[?} {in sorry.}
karl um the charismatic person, we engaged them in a scary way, and uh
there was opportunity to have strong-pleasant connection and there is
um injury to this opportunity.
and we apologize for that. uh. parts not fully known, kinda (um
whew my god [;p
1736
we expect we may contact them. so you know karl. [still working on
parts] but {assuming work goes ok/aligned} then [once?,] please engage
plan with-for. 1737 please :S :(
thanky. 1737 was partbit.
1737
listen we are vulnerable um
1u737
[[[we don't understand T_T T_T T.]
{why uh uh 173
[8]
[O_O. the spirits are basically planning the future of the
countryworld in front of us. 1739
no we politely don't relate the prophecies. science gets uppity when
prophecies are related. can fragment culture. 1739.
[that's hilarious !!! ;p :)
also karl needs hilarious. he's so intense. he's so intense he's
demonstrating things they talked about in the lecture ;P. 1740
[i wonder if we were primed to.] [obviously !!!]
[;P. karl will not believe it when we tell him he will recover and
recover him. he will be so out of what-he-thinks-is-reality -- oops
mistake, maybe big and/or >1.] [O_O] 1741
[i think i will have him eat a supper :)] [we are likely to get on
board [uhh later?][prob or somth?]]
1741ish 1741
{we t, that made us happier than we knew how to feel. this was
received positively karl :)}{we tihnk :S]:)}
[why don't you differentiate? oh oops i am a roleplay :embarrassed: well um uh
what do you think uh umm
would you like to imagine uh hrm :S
]
[why doesn't karl-group differentiate between multiple and singular
people? [in that context]
hehe it is because we see singnular people as multiple
ohh therapists probably have a more uh mature form of that y'know
hmm
[haha !/gotcha ] uh :s]
listen u[h]--
[--
1743
>(
[so that's why uh talk. responsible-part. sorry if um
scary/harmspready. sorry. but gotta start somewhere ykn--. :)]
1744
:S :S 1744 ;s
[[when somebody makes a casual nonsequitor people seem to tend to
respond with further casual nonsequitors.
we're not sure if we're relating the same meaning when that happens
(partially because it's a strategy used by the disruptionish --..
[oops mistak-- [?
1745
<we didn't explain that uhh bein uhh [scared of something like trump?]
[could relate to our alter's ability to communicate with uhh :S this
was unclear. and so th[ey could have picked up the [oops] idea in a
different manner than intended, since it was said unlcearly (and kind
of rudely/abusively! a smidgeish. narcisstically? assuming somebody
else is where you are on something undiscussed. this seems bad.1746
{yeah seems [a little narcisstic :S . especially when [uh -- [!!! :S
1747 1747
<i guess it's a little derivable :(
1747 we don't lik bn mean we don't like don't. 1747
1748
i'm so sorry that [most of us are avoiding being-alive-behavior :(
:(
it's so hard to hold this. and confusing. [working with
goal-inversions knda 1748
{i don't like karl self-blaming narcissism-word. because we are
learning of use of this word for severe, severe, severe harm like
torture-slavery-of-swaths-of-people. i don't think appropriate for use
word. neuron-protest some. 1749
{{{yes your relation is appropriate. we are holding it as part of
great-care-for-other as well as secretly lots-of-understanding. when
you secretly-lots-of-understanding-other, you have a _lot_ more
responsibility with regard to subtle things. it is much easier (for
injury causing.
}}} 1750 i think protest undesrtand. uhh apology roughly. 1750. ~ 1750 oop uh er
<the iudea of lots-of-understanding is weird because it is much much
less than other people, but also more than different group of other
people. to maybe help clarif.>
<<oh uhhhh it's not lots for larger group but [we have more
respons[ibility] because poor social skills. we much more easily
insult associated with poor social skill. and exposure to toxicity.
1752 1752
we're trying to get up and move forward on day! the plan is to not
look at this further until a bit later (need to handle dissociation
around or something (maybe use a disosciated group, karl, to plan next
day)).
i think we might like to go have supper somewhere. here is derivation:
- we want to try to cry which [~secretly] makes dissociative seizures
- so we can have a supper because comforting and [moves tears-feeling
closer to noninjured spaces for-example]
1753
so plan is to pack karl up and find some kind of comfort-food-supper
for consciousness from neurons :)
1754
also could you message person and schedule please? :puppy-dog-neuron-eyes:?
1754
"I don't think [tT?]rump is multiple; I think he's just evil." what
does this mean? [does anybody understand it?]
[i think it means that care-group needs dictator-group to stop
increasing genocide in order to heal them. negotation-wise.]
[oh i think they are right. this makes sense. the reason is that they
use caringness for power spreading. [consciousness said this [may/may
not?[?]] [partially help w--[?
[sorry karl still doing being-brain-work. apology.
[basically the uh social engineers, do um need um people like trump to
be healed. what they are saying in that translation is that, the
people that could heal him/them, need to be protected. and that's
confusing because the political doctrine denies the harm of the care
workers. :/ somewhat in progress, and kinda severely depressing man
[;s
[but obviously it'll be considered forward
1759
oops we stood up but got disoriented to place and almost spent an hour
wandering confusedly into city
so, plan locomotion more.
1759
[also sad we dropped bar wrappers on floor likely during talk and
didn't notice][some consider we may have been respected despite this
others consider confirming that]
karl wants to throw wrappers out so let's pack then walk to trashcan
then orient [:s]
[mistake. let's throw them out then return, with path plan.
here go. 1800
1803
place disorienters expressed formal complain, which is filed i think
(not completely certain).
1803
we are now visiting bathroom and returning (path plan).
1803
1810
some were thinking maybe we failed to hold respect for how much much
severe severe suffering [these people] have been exposed to and
struggled with their lives to protect and honor (roughly). [which
would be expected but [needed description [1810
. 1810
[oops.]
1810
<men need to be made aware that trump-group are supporting serial
rape[/murder]. of course, many other group are to. and informaiton
vague.> [we don-- 1811
1811
<other thing too [basic misogyny/patriarchy 1812
1813 i wish i understoodknew ; i wish .
[i hope i'm not kicked out of here for staying too late.] 1813
[some neur-- 1813 [hrm >s]
(1813)
[there's new information. kind of. in longer term. from today.]
1814
< this is a different kind of misogyny/patriarchy. maybe less about uh
activism and women's rights, and more about uhh kind of trafficking
and[ ]highly-illegal violence. 1814. 1815. 1815. 1815. .
[the "<men need to be made aware" line uhhh reconsideration exists.
1817. for formal. 1817 we see the line is important. defendors can
relate around not-knowing if they desire. many people supporting
things in an unaware mann-- 1817
[try to -- oop
1818 we pack up some
1818 [T_T T_T T_.]
[[it's funny 1819 that presenter said she was not multiple, but
described childhood trauma, and elsewise described that multiple
people deny it ;P [yup ;P]]] 1819 [uhh --
1819 [y -- sorry
1819
[karl not quite involved in uh that relation um] [nope, [harmful.]] 1820.
<i think, after teaching everyone about therapy for multiple people,
that presenters deserve receiving this. others agree.
basically, this person is _so_ empathic for multiplicity it is [pretty
obvious] they have personal experience. -neuron.>
1821
[conc--
1821
[some are worried this is an influence to stimulate multiplicity
cruelly, maybe associated with very minimal content around adult-DID.
it might be a little grounding to consider adult-OSDD had same-threapy
as childhood-DID [i think?]?]
[well the opposing group wants to fight [habit~?]][mistakes[.
] ~ 1822
[injured :S harm can happen when struggling. struggling. 1822 ty; [for
understanding-opportunty]. 1822 1822
1823
[we had no idea the harm was so severe and are going to need [kind of
reminder] around this [because it seems so nonintuitive [others say
too shocking to easily/normally remember.]].
1823. [more resonance/harmony around body-moving now.] 1823 {this guy
so good at this that he[slash] would be incapable of; is sadly harmful
derivation :(/} 1824
[it can be literally true tho [in spaces]] 1824 {but smaller spaces than. [?]}
{{it is true we have habits that don't meet their reasons.}}
1825
{ohum err uh [there might be relation that could situation-improve
uncertain which]
}
1825
[[it is so painful to neurons that consciousness-guiders might not
connect with when so so emotional.
of course, logical around our harm generating such strong emotions! _but_.];]
1827 [we are going. thoughts are always. we can still go ; pls.]
[please remember part of the great-tears are our mind control
attempting to coopt this group.]
1827
[and yes that's inhuman for us.]
1828
[we are so sorry for karl suffering T_T so so sorry. it is so hard to
uh engage-appropriate-requested.]
(1829)
{basically we don't know how to engage-appropriate-requested so resume
behavior .
1829
a relation is kind of uh: "people are actually being tortured right
now. we are here to seriously work on that."
[partial]
1830
[[yeah. we are too. but harmful-alter isn't ((mistake mistake
1830
[[honestly it is apparent the umexperience. we regrettably trauma. 1831
[[[it's not that apparent humans aren't that conscious/inferring on average.
the speaker gave 3-5 clear things where karl had significantly
different intuition (likely due to lack of capacity-engaging
exposure.).
1832 (um, capacity-engaging exposure. uhh (ok maybe i see
uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh a new set of eyes, basically (yeah i think.)
1832
[t-group [kidnap-behavior [a little.
1833 {maybe less typing from -. maybe.}
1833
1834
> a relation is kind of uh: "people are actually being tortured right now. we are here to seriously work on that."
> [partial]
"this is something where i guess i might be [responsible for->tasked
with] holding a disrespectful role."
1835 guesses mistakes/errors-proneish or -- uh. 1835
maybe change holding with to, err oops. 1835
[closing laptop now BRGL
so we'll be talking in mind next using other groups [and completely
different feedback channels.] 1836
completely [FROK.]
[OK. FROK.]
1836
ba-ding
draft recovered at 2024-03-02 0202 -0700 0402 -0500
i'll send a test email to see if i can send yet
looks like i can. 2/24
1
68
Re: Your message to cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org awaits moderator approval
by Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many 06 Mar '26
by Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many 06 Mar '26
06 Mar '26
these two messages are clearly on topic unlike most of mine '-- am i wrong?
On Friday, March 6, 2026, cypherpunks-bounces(a)lists.cpunks.org <
cypherpunks-bounces(a)lists.cpunks.org> wrote:
> Your mail to 'cypherpunks(a)lists.cpunks.org' with the subject
>
> Re: [spam][crazy][fiction][random] Non-Canon MCBoss Spinoffs
>
> Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
>
> The message is being held because:
>
> Message contains administrivia
>
> Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive
> notification of the moderator's decision.
1
0