cypherpunks
Threads by month
- ----- 2024 -----
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2013 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
April 2024
- 6 participants
- 686 discussions
Does Short-selling Discipline Earnings Manipulation? Disciplined Short Sellers Handbook (W/58 Highlights Attached)
by Gunnar Larson 23 Aug '24
by Gunnar Larson 23 Aug '24
23 Aug '24
Does Short-selling Discipline Earnings Manipulation?
xNY.io - Bank.org recently collated international graduate scholar working
notes coining the "Crypto Computer Crimes Manual
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/11tbgHgDg8qagomO-NBffvIFpxXKmBC3g/view?usp=…>"
as per best disclosure practices to illustrate various potential scenarios
when market conditions are met and a Board of Directors potentially
exploits blockchain technological software innovation with forecastable
reckless consequences.
The Disciplined Short Sellers Handbook serves as a Manual supplement ...
Detailing the hypothesis that short-selling has a disciplining role
vis-à-vis the managers forcing them to reduce earning manipulation.
Across 33 countries, the Handbook documents a significantly negative
relationship between lending supply and activism in the short sell market
and earnings manipulation.
Collectively, findings suggest that short selling provides an external
governance
mechanism to discipline managerial incentives.
xNY.io highlights that the authors of the faculty and research study
confirm the main hypotheses and provide evidence of a beneficial effect of
the short-selling market on the corporate market. In other words,
short-selling generates a disciplining effect similar to the effect
produced by the contestability of the firm in the context of M&As.
In this regard, short selling contributes not only to the information
environment of the market but also to the contracting institutions of the
real economy. Suggesting that in general the disciplining role of
short-selling is the strongest for firms with weak internal governance or
less transparent information environments.
We share 58 highlights to the Handbook
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aLcmN5c2PJiqHYR5dy8C8qMNVyclw8lu/view?usp=…>
as a disclosure technique, foreshadowing xNY.io's disciplined approach to
trading in the near term (subject to regulatory scrutiny).
1
5
[image: IC3 logo]Complaint Referral Form
Internet Crime Complaint Center
Thank you. Your complaint was submitted to the IC3. Please save or print a
copy of your complaint before closing this window.*This is the only time
you will have to make a copy of your complaint.*
Victim InformationName: Gunnar LarsonAre you reporting on behalf of a
business? NoBusiness Name: Is the incident currently impacting business
operations? Age: 30 - 39Address: 406 West 25th StreetAddress
(continued): Suite/Apt./Mail
Stop: 1RECity: New YorkCounty: Country: United States of AmericaState: New
YorkZip Code/Route: 10001Phone Number: 6464549107Email Address:
g(a)xny.ioBusiness
IT POC, if applicable: Other Business POC, if applicable: Financial
Transaction(s)Transaction Type: OtherIf other, please specify: Notary
FraudTransaction
Amount: 2400.00Transaction Date: 10/6/2022Was the money sent? No
------------------------------
Victim Bank Name: Victim Bank Address: Victim Bank Address (continued): Victim
Bank Suite/Mail Stop: Victim Bank City: Victim Bank Country: Victim Bank
State: Victim Bank Zip Code/Route: Victim Name on Account: Victim Account
Number:
------------------------------
Recipient Bank Name: Recipient Bank Address: Recipient Bank Address
(continued): Recipient Bank Suite/Mail Stop: Recipient Bank City: Recipient
Bank Country: Recipient Bank State: Recipient Bank Zip Code/Route: Recipient
Name on Account: Recipient Bank Routing Number: Recipient Account
Number: Recipient
Bank SWIFT Code: Description of IncidentProvide a description of the
incident and how you were victimized. Provide information not captured
elsewhere in this complaint form.Hello: I was hired as a contractor for a
online drop shipping company. The firm sent packages to my home address.
The shipping manager asked me to retrieve a package by providing a
notorized authorization letter. Upon reviewing the authorization letter and
searching New York State's notary verification system, it appeared the
notary was forged. A copy of the letter may be accessed here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Hqzatqez7yWs7ZZq76RBYy2zzi6NiDw9/view?usp=…
Below, you will find the exchange with the shipping manager. On October 31
the firm denied payment for employment and has 'gone missing.' Given my
personal and professional association with xNY.io - Bank.org I am concerned
about being associated with felony notary Fraud. Furthrtmore, xNY.io -
Bank.org is party to the Clayton Act and/or an entrapment exercise. Thank
you Gunnar Larson 646-454-9107 Which of the following were used in this
incident? (Check all that apply.)☑ Spoofed Email☑ Similar Domain☑ Email
Intrusion
☐ OtherPlease specify:
Other InformationIf an email was used in this incident, please provide a
copy of the entire email including full email headers. ---------- Forwarded
message --------- From: Dorothy Berry <dorothy.berry(a)dvlemail.com> Date:
Fri, Oct 7, 2022, 2:44 PM Subject: Re: 290283 To: Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io>
I will coordinate with our Legal team regarding this. The authorization
letter was given by the customer. --- Kind regards, Dorothy Berry | Manager
Shipping Department Direct number:(475) 330-3037 DELTA VISION (DVS
Logistics US) 45 Ruby St #3 Norwalk, CT 06850 (888) 559 9329 Mon-Fri
09:00AM-06:00PM EST Sat-Sun Closed ---- On Fri, 07 Oct 2022 14:33:19 -0400
Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> wrote --- No. I won't go present an authorized
letter to anyone with a fake notarized stamp on it. Please advise. On Fri,
Oct 7, 2022, 1:48 PM Dorothy Berry <dorothy.berry(a)dvlemail.com> wrote: Did
you try picking up package and show Authorization letter to them? --- Kind
regards, Dorothy Berry | Manager Shipping Department Direct number:(475)
330-3037 DELTA VISION (DVS Logistics US) 45 Ruby St #3 Norwalk, CT 06850
(888) 559 9329 Mon-Fri 09:00AM-06:00PM EST Sat-Sun Closed ---- On Fri, 07
Oct 2022 08:56:52 -0400 Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> wrote --- Ms. Berry: I am
having trouble verifying the authentication of the notarized document.. I
just left you a message. Please advise best next steps. Thank you, Gunnar
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022, 4:33 PM Dorothy Berry <dorothy.berry(a)dvlemail.com>
wrote: Good day! Please find the attached file. Thanks. --- Kind regards,
Dorothy Berry | Manager Shipping Department Direct number:(475) 330-3037
DELTA VISION (DVS Logistics US) 45 Ruby St #3 Norwalk, CT 06850 (888) 559
9329 Mon-Fri 09:00AM-06:00PM EST Sat-Sun Closed Are there any other
witnesses or victims to this incident?Yes.If you have reported this
incident to other law enforcement or government agencies, please provide
the name, phone number, email, date reported, report number, etc.[No
response provided]Check here if this an update to a previously filed
complaint: ☐Who Filed the ComplaintWere you the victim in the incident
described above? Yes
Name: Business Name: Phone Number: Email Address:
Digital Signature
By digitally signing this document, I affirm that the information I
provided is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I understand
that providing false information could make me subject to fine,
imprisonment, or both. (Title 18, U.S.Code, Section 1001)
Digital Signature: Gunnar Larson
Thank you. Your complaint was submitted to the IC3. Please save or print a
copy of your complaint before closing this window. *This is the only time
you will have to make a copy of your complaint.*
1
2
Law Society of Scotland on Post Office Scandal Litigation - Litigation Finance Journal
by Gunnar Larson 22 Aug '24
by Gunnar Larson 22 Aug '24
22 Aug '24
Check out my recent article:
https://litigationfinancejournal.com/law-society-of-scotland-on-post-office…
The Law Society of Scotland shares a new debrief of the Post Office
scandal. The story goes: When the Horizon computer system found over 736
sub-postmasters were allegedly grifting from the United Kingdom’s postal
budgets, they were summarily punished. However, Horizon’s back office
capabilities were later found to contain bugs and other system defects that
allegedly found workers at fault by mistake. Enter litigation funding, a
utility that many of the former post office workers found necessary to
clear their name.
According to the Law Society of Scotland, February of 2022 saw the
initiation of a public debate and investigation on the totality of the Post
Office scandal’s effects. The whole affair is being dubbed an extreme case
of United Kingdom justice malfeasance. Furthermore, the Law Society
explains that about 10% of the 736 criminal records have been overturned. A
class of 555 claimants have won restitution, totaling £20,000 each.
Click here to read more about the Law Society of Scotland’s take on the
Post Office Scandal.
1
2
Advisory board goal for Post Office scandal victims to be returned to rightful financial position
by Gunnar Larson 22 Aug '24
by Gunnar Larson 22 Aug '24
22 Aug '24
https://www.computerweekly.com/news/252529287/Advisory-board-goal-for-Post-…
The board set up to monitor the compensation scheme for Post Office scandal
victims agrees goal of returning them to the financial position they would
be in had the scandal never happened
Karl Flinders, Chief reporter and senior editor EMEA
Published: 18 Jan 2023 12:15
The advisory board set up to oversee compensation awards to 555 victims of
the Post Office Horizon scandal has agreed a goal of returning them to the
financial position they would have been in had the scandal not happened.
Thousands of former subpostmasters were blamed for accounting shortfalls
caused by errors in the Post Office accounting software. They were forced
to repay huge sums, and were often bankrupted as a result. Many were
prosecuted and sent to prison.
The scandal destroyed the lives and livelihoods of the former
subpostmasters and their families for decades, with many suffering
stress-related illness. Suicides have been linked with the scandal.
In its first meeting, the GLO Compensation Scheme Advisory Board met
representatives of the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial
Strategy (BEIS).
The board agreed: “As with the general law, the goal should be to restore
the claimants to the position that they would have been in if the scandal
had not happened.”
The 555 former subpostmasters and Post Office branch workers were part of a
Group Litigation Order (GLO), which in 2019 proved that the software used
by Post Office branches, known as Horizon, was causing the unexplained
shortfalls they were blamed for.
They proved the software, from Fujitsu, was to blame, and forced the Post
Office to admit this was the case after nearly 20 years of denying it.
The Justice for Subpostmasters Alliance
The victory for the 555 subpostmasters in the High Court, all part of the
Justice for Subpostmasters Alliance (JFSA), were awarded £58m in damages,
but after their legal costs – provided by a litigation funder that requires
repayment with interest – were taken out, they were left with just £11m to
share. This left people that had lost homes, businesses and huge sums of
money with an average of a few thousand pounds each.
The judgements in the High Court case, which was paid for by the victims,
also triggered the unravelling of one of the biggest miscarriages of
justice in British history. So far, more than 80 former subpostmasters have
had wrongful convictions for theft and fraud overturned.
The court ruling also forced the Post Office to set up a compensation
scheme for any subpostmaster affected by the Horizon errors.
But the Post Office and its government backer did not allow any of the 555
that took part in the court action to apply, citing that the compensation
that was already paid was “full and final”.
Alan Bates, the former subpostmaster who set up the JFSA in 2009 and has
chaired it since, wrote to the government after the court victory,
demanding it paid the legal costs to leave JFSA members with fairer
compensation, but the government refused.
But Bates and JFSA members kept pushing the government for justice, and
through generating public pressure and instigating a judicial review forced
the government to set up a statutory public inquiry into the Horizon
scandal, which is ongoing.
Although compensation was initially left out of the terms of reference of
the public inquiry, the JFSA and its supporters forced the government to
include an examination of compensation.
Fair compensation
The JFSA kept fighting for fair compensation, just as they had fought for
justice for over a decade, and in June, the government was forced to agree
to pay it.
The GLO Compensation Scheme Advisory Board, set up to oversee the JFSA
compensation scheme, is made up of University of Oxford professor
Christopher Hodges, who is chair, peer James Arbuthnot and MP Kevan Jones,
who have supported and campaigned for justice for victims of the Horizon
scandal for two decades.
Arbuthnot said he was encouraged by the first meeting of the board with
BIES representatives. “Two key principles – the need for the goal to be to
restore the claimants to the position that they would have been in if the
scandal had not happened, and the imperative of speed of compensation –
were agreed,” he said. “Now we need to ensure that both are carried out.”
Jones said: “Good progress was made during the first meeting of the GLO
Compensation Scheme Advisory Board, including the parameters of the scheme.
The next meeting will be in February, where we will discuss setting up the
scheme as soon as possible.”
JFSA chair Bates said: “An oversight board was something very much missing
in previous schemes and it offers reassurance to the scheme that people
that have been so supportive over the years are involved. It also provides
some transparency.”
In 2009, Computer Weekly told the stories of seven subpostmasters affected
by the problems (see timeline of Computer Weekly articles below).
Read all Computer Weekly articles about the scandal since 2009
May 2009: Bankruptcy, prosecution and disrupted livelihoods – postmasters
tell their story.
September 2009: Postmasters form action group after accounts shortfall.
November 2009: Post Office theft case deferred over IT questions.
May 2010: A pilot of the new Horizon Online system at Royal Mail has been
scaled back after connectivity problems and outages.
February 2011: Post Office faces legal action over alleged accounting
system failures.
October 2011: 85 subpostmasters seek legal support in claims against Post
Office computer system.
June 2012: Post Office launches external review of system at centre of
legal disputes.
January 2013: Post Office admits Horizon system needs more investigation.
January 2013: Post Office announces amnesty for Horizon evidence.
January 2013: Post Office wants to get to bottom of IT system allegations.
June 2013: Investigation into Post Office accounting system to drill down
on strongest cases.
July 2013: Post Office Horizon system investigation reveals concerns.
October 2013: End in sight for subpostmaster claims against Post Office’s
Horizon accounting system.
October 2013: Former Lord Justice of Appeal Hooper joins Post Office
Horizon investigation.
November 2013: 150 subpostmasters file claims over “faulty” Horizon
accounting system.
September 2014: Fresh questions raised over Post Office IT system’s role in
fraud cases.
December 2014: MPs blast Post Office over IT system investigation and
remove backing.
December 2014: Why MPs lost faith in the Post Office’s IT investigation,
but vowed to fight on.
December 2014: MPs to debate subpostmaster IT injustice claims.
December 2014: MP accuses Post Office of acting ‘duplicitously’ in IT
investigation.
January 2015: MPs force inquiry into Post Office subpostmaster mediation
scheme.
January 2015: Post Office faces grilling by MPs over Horizon accounting
system.
February 2015: Post Office CIO will talk to any subpostmaster about IT
problems, promises CEO.
March 2015: Post Office ends working group for IT system investigation day
before potentially damaging report.
March 2015: MPs seek reassurance over Post Office mediation scheme.
March 2015: Retiring MP aims to uncover truth of alleged Post Office
computer system problems.
April 2015: Post Office failed to investigate account shortfalls before
legal action, report claims.
April 2015: Criminal Courts Review Commission set to review subpostmasters’
claims of wrongful prosecution.
June 2015: Post Office looking to replace controversial Horizon system with
IBM, says MP.
July 2015: Campaigners call for independent inquiry into Post Office
Horizon IT system dispute.
October 2015: James Arbuthnot takes Post Office IT fight to House of Lords.
November 2015: The union that represents Post Office subpostmasters has
warned of a problem with the Horizon accounting system.
November 2015: An email from Post Office IT support reveals a problem with
the Horizon system and supporting processes that could lead to accounting
errors.
November 2015: Group litigation against Post Office being prepared in
Horizon dispute.
February 2016: Post Office faces group litigation over Horizon IT as
subpostmasters fund class action.
June 2016: Post Office chairman Tim Parker says there would be
“considerable risk” associated with changing its Horizon computer system.
November 2016: The legal team hired by a group of subpostmasters will take
their case to the next stage.
January 2017: The group action against the Post Office that alleges
subpostmasters have been wrongly punished for accounting errors gets green
light from the High Court of Justice.
March 2017: 1,000 subpostmasters apply to join IT-related group litigation
against Post Office.
April 2017: Investigation into claims of miscarriages of justice in
relation to a Post Office accounting system has appointed a forensic
accountant firm.
May 2017: Hundreds of subpostmasters have applied to join IT-related legal
action since March.
July 2017: Post Office defence in computer system legal case due this week.
August 2017: Campaigners submit initial evidence in group litigation
against Post Office over controversial Horizon IT system.
October 2017: Subpostmasters’ group action against the Post Office reaches
an important milestone.
November 2017: An end is in sight for subpostmasters’ campaign against
alleged wrongful prosecution, which they blame on a faulty computer system.
November 2017: The High Court judge managing the subpostmasters versus Post
Office legal case over an allegedly faulty computer system tells legal
teams to cooperate.
January 2018: Forensic investigation into Post Office IT system at centre
of legal case nears completion.
April 2018: Criminal Cases Review Commission forensic examination of the IT
system at the centre of a legal case against the Post Office has raised
further questions.
May 2018: Post Office branches unable to connect to Horizon computer system
for several hours after morning opening time.
October 2018: After over a decade of controversy, next week marks the
beginning of a court battle between subpostmasters and the Post Office.
November 2018: Case against Post Office in relation to allegedly faulty
computer system begins in High Court.
November 2018: High Court case in which subpostmasters are suing the Post
Office has revealed a known problem with a computer system at the core of
the dispute.
November 2018: A High Court trial, where subpostmasters are suing the Post
Office for damages caused by an allegedly faulty IT system, ends second
week.
November 2018: Post Office director admits to Horizon errors and not
sharing details with subpostmaster network.
November 2018: The High Court trial in which subpostmasters are suing the
Post Office has reached an important stage.
December 2018: CCRC may hold off subpostmaster decision until after Post
Office Horizon trial.
December 2018: Court case where subpostmasters are suing the Post Office
set to span at least four trials and extend into 2020.
January 2019: Subpostmasters’ campaign group attacks Post Office CEO Paula
Vennells’ New Year honour amid ongoing court case.
January 2019: Thousands of known errors on controversial Post Office
computer system to be revealed.
March 2019: Tech under spotlight at High Court in second subpostmasters
versus Post Office trial.
March 2019: Post Office considered Horizon IT system “high-risk”, court
told.
March 2019: CCRC watching Post Office Horizon trial closely.
March 2019: Judge rules that Post Office showed “oppressive behaviour” in
response to claimants accused of accounting errors they blamed on Horizon
IT system.
March 2019: Post Office “lacked humanity” in the treatment of
subpostmasters, says peer.
March 2019: A High Court judge heard that the Post Office did not
investigate a computer system error that could cause losses, despite being
offered evidence.
March 2019: The Post Office legal team in the case brought by more than 500
subpostmasters has called for the judge to be recused after questioning his
impartiality.
March 2019: A senior civil servant asked the Post Office to repay public
money it had wrongly allocated to paying legal costs.
April 2019: Subpostmaster claimants’ legal team makes application for the
Post Office to pay millions of pounds of costs associated with trial.
April 2019: Post Office to appeal judgment from first Horizon trial.
April 2019: The Post Office’s claim that the judge overseeing the case
concerning its controversial Horizon IT system was biased has been
dismissed.
April 2019: MP questions government over Post Office Horizon case.
April 2019: Government says no conflict of interest in trial despite Post
Office chairman’s dual role.
May 2019: The Court of Appeal has refused the Post Office’s application to
appeal a major decision in the Horizon IT trial.
May 2019: The Post Office has applied for permission to appeal judgments
from the first trial in its IT-related legal battle with subpostmasters.
May 2019: The judge in the Post Office Horizon trial has ordered the
organisation to pay the legal costs of its courtroom adversaries, and
refused to give permission to appeal a major judgment.
June 2019: Post Office asks Court of Appeal for permission to appeal
judgment in first Horizon trial.
July 2019: The Post Office has admitted that some subpostmasters are at
risk of accounts not balancing due to an error it does not understand.
July 2019: Problem revealed during High Court trial left subpostmaster with
£18,000 surplus after IT system failed to register full amount of cash
scanned in.
August 2019: Subpostmasters suffering slow running and frozen terminals
while Post Office searches for a fix to issues apparently caused by a
software update.
August 2019: The Post Office has fixed the latest problems with its Horizon
system, affecting hundreds of branches.
October 2019: A High Court judgment for a trial that focused on the Post
Office’s IT system at the centre of a multimillion-pound litigation will be
announced early next month.
November 2019: The Court of Appeal has rejected a Post Office application
to appeal judgments made in its multimillion-pound battle with
subpostmasters over IT system failures.
November 2019: Peer calls for clear-out of Post Office board after Court of
Appeal confirms major court defeat.
December 2019: The Post Office has settled its long-running legal dispute
with subpostmasters, and will pay £57.75m in damages.
December 2019: Subpostmansters ended their legal battle with the Post
Office at the optimal time, according to the lawyer that managed the High
Court action.
December 2019: Subpostmansters proved right on IT system failures as calls
for full public inquiry mount.
December 2019: Criminal Courts Review Commission to review Horizon judgment
“swiftly”.
December 2019: National Federation of Subpostmasters cries foul after court
ruling on controversial computer system.
December 2019: Former Post Office CEO apologises to subpostmasters over
Horizon scandal.
December 2019: Call for former Post Office CEO to step down from public
roles after IT court battle lost.
January 2020: Fujitsu must face scrutiny following Post Office Horizon
trial judgment.
January 2020: Subpostmaster group calls for government to pay legal costs
for Horizon trial.
January 2020: Why subpostmasters are calling on the government to pay
Horizon trial costs.
January 2020: Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy says it
did not make decisions in the Post Office’s recent court battle.
January 2020: Government should not be allowed to dismiss subpostmasters’
claims over Horizon IT scandal.
January 2020: Police sent information about potential Fujitsu staff perjury
in subpostmaster prosecutions.
January 2020: Prosecutions are a significant step closer to being sent to
the Court of Appeal as Criminal Courts Review Commission forms a group of
commissioners to review them.
January 2020: Alan Bates: The “details man” the Post Office paid the price
for ignoring.
February 2020: The government has refused to pay the huge legal costs
subpostmasters incurred in their battle with the government-owned Post
Office, which they won.
February 2020: Members of Parliament seeking a public inquiry into the Post
Office Horizon scandal face huge challenges, but pressure and time could
force justice.
February 2020: Calls for inquiry into Post Office IT scandal increase in
Parliament, with cross-party support.
February 2020: Care Quality Commission to review concerns over Paula
Vennells’ appointment after they were raised by a former NHS consultant
psychiatrist.
February 2020: Government admits it was too passive managing Post Office as
parliamentary pressure builds.
February 2020: Minister says Post Office IT experts misled the government
when it asked questions about subpostmasters’ concerns over Horizon IT
system.
March 2020: Boris Johnson commits to “getting to the bottom of” Post Office
Horizon IT scandal.
March 2020: Boris Johnson’s commitment to inquiry into Post Office scandal
in doubt.
March 2020: MPs call on PM to commit to full public inquiry into Post
Office Horizon IT scandal.
March 2020: Those who did not play by the rules in Post Office Horizon
scandal “should face prosecution”.
March 2020: MPs told to hold to account those responsible for Post Office
Horizon IT scandal.
March 2020: The Post Office has sparked anger with secret settlements with
subpostmasters outside the recent legal action against it.
March 2020: Labour MP Karl Turner tells Computer Weekly that the Post
Office Horizon scandal is the most grotesque version of predatory
capitalism he has ever seen.
March 2020: MP Kevan Jones has warned a government minister not to repeat
the mistakes of predecessors in relation to the Post Office Horizon IT
scandal.
March 2020: Criminal Cases Review Commission to use Microsoft Teams to
ensure review of subpostmaster prosecutions is held on time.
March 2020: Post Office postpones subpostmaster compensation scheme amid
Covid-19 crisis.
March 2020: Meeting reviewing subpostmaster applications to appeal criminal
prosecutions moves into second day.
March 2020: Subpostmaster prosecutions to be considered by Court of Appeal
for miscarriages of justice.
March 2020: How subpostmasters made legal history with biggest referral of
potential miscarriages of justice.
April 2020: Met Police examines information about evidence given in court
by Fujitsu staff on the Horizon IT system.
May 2020: Subpostmasters who had their lives ruined by the Post Office’s
faulty IT system have received their damages after a High Court victory.
May 2020: A senior Post Office executive at the centre of an IT scandal,
who tried to mislead a High Court judge in relation to it, has left the
organisation without fanfare despite many years of service.
May 2020: Post Office re-examines hundreds of prosecutions that could have
resulted from faults in Horizon IT system.
June 2020: A campaign group representing subpostmasters wrongly prosecuted
for theft and false accounting by the Post Office is raising money to help
clear the names of victims of the scandal.
June 2020: Subpostmasters to force scrutiny of government’s role in Post
Office IT scandal.
June 2020: The Criminal Cases Review Commission sends 47 more subpostmaster
cases to Court of Appeal and asks government to review private prosecution
powers.
June 2020: Select committee chair writes to former Post Office CEO
demanding answers over her role in IT scandal.
June 2020: The government has been accused of launching a review that fails
in getting to the bottom of one of the biggest miscarriages of justice in
UK history.
June 2020: Subpostmasters will not cooperate with government review into IT
scandal.
June 2020: The government’s proposed review of the Post Office IT scandal
has received a further setback as forensic accountants join subpostmasters
in refusing to back it.
June 2020: Call for government review of Post Office Horizon scandal to
have the power to force individuals to give evidence under oath.
June 2020: Subpostmasters seeking justice in the Post Office Horizon IT
scandal are regaining momentum in Parliament.
June 2020: Healthcare regulator will be discussing concerns about former
NHS boss chairing an NHS trust at an upcoming meeting.
June 2020: Second Sight is working with law firm in appeals by
subpostmasters against criminal convictions in Horizon IT scandal.
June 2020: Post Office and Fujitsu blame each other for many of the
failings in the Horizon IT scandal that wrecked lives.
June 2020: Parliamentary Justice Committee to hold short inquiry into the
rules and regulations surrounding private organisations’ ability to
initiate criminal proceedings.
July 2020: Victims of the Post Office Horizon IT scandal need to raise
thousands of pounds in a week or those responsible for their suffering will
avoid scrutiny.
July 2020: The government is set to face scrutiny over its involvement in
the Post Office Horizon IT scandal, described as one of the biggest
miscarriages of justice in modern UK history.
September 2020: The government repeats that it won’t pay victims’ legal
costs and confirms review into the scandal will not have the power to call
witnesses.
September 2020: Subpostmasters still not being told about all the known
errors in the controversial Post Office branch accounting and retail system
that they use.
October 2020: The Post Office has chosen not to contest 44 out of 47
appeals, meaning most are likely to have their names cleared, but others
still face a Court of Appeal battle for justice.
October 2020: MPs are demanding the government holds a full statutory
public inquiry into the Post Office IT scandal.
October 2020: NHS regulator continues enquiries about the appointment of
former Post Office CEO at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust as more
damning details emerge.
October 2020: Government minister met with former subpostmaster online in
an attempt to get victims of the Post Office Horizon scandal involved in
government review.
October 2020: The Post Office is focusing urgently on fixing an IT error
suffered by a subpostmaster amid the ongoing IT scandal.
October 2020: Labour politicians are calling for the government to give the
Post Office Horizon scandal inquiry the power to force witnesses to give
evidence if they don’t cooperate.
October 2020: Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust has asked for external
review of its process when appointing controversial executive.
November 2020: Government faces scrutiny of its handling of the Post Office
IT scandal that destroyed subpostmasters’ lives and livelihoods.
November 2020: Post Office branches offline during busy business hours
after suffering an IT error that the Post Office said related to IT from
supplier Fujitsu.
November 2020: Fujitsu is refusing to explain what caused a national system
outage in Post Office branches last week, despite the Post Office
confirming the issue was the fault of the supplier.
November 2020: The Metropolitan Police opens criminal investigation into
Fujitsu staff who gave evidence in trials of subpostmasters wrongly
prosecuted and even imprisoned for financial crimes.
November 2020: Post Office criticised over vagueness of its explanation of
the cause of a UK-wide IT failure that saw subpostmasters unable to do
business.
November 2020: Post Office says planned firmware update caused the problem
that left branches unable to do business for 90 minutes.
November 2020: Court documents reveal the names of the Fujitsu employees
under investigation for potentially providing misleading information in
criminal trials.
November 2020: The government allowed the Post Office to ‘run amok’ and
destroy lives, says complaint to Parliamentary Ombudsman.
November 2020: Campaigning politician demands access to documents that
could prove that the Post Office lied.
December 2020: Government denies responsibility for the abuse inflicted on
subpostmasters by the Post Office over faulty IT system.
December 2020: CEO at the centre of the scandal that saw innocent people
bankrupted and some sent to prison steps down from NHS role as pressure for
her resignation grows.
December 2020: History made as subpostmasters wrongly prosecuted in Horizon
IT scandal have convictions quashed.
December 2020: The appointment of a former Post Office executive, who tried
to mislead a judge, in the Football Association of Wales has been
questioned by an MP.
December 2020: Court of Appeal indicates subpostmasters can pursue appeal
route that could do more damage to Post Office’s reputation.
January 2021: NHS trust defends its director appointment process following
an external review of its recruitment of former Post Office CEO Paula
Vennells.
January 2021: Lawyers call for changes to digital evidence rule that made
it easier for the Post Office to ‘bamboozle courts’ and make subpostmasters
pay a heavy price for its IT failings.
January 2021: The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) has referred four
more subpostmasters’ criminal convictions to appeal, as part of the biggest
miscarriage of justice in modern UK history.
February 2021: A former senior developer who worked for Fujitsu on the Post
Office IT system that led to subpostmasters being falsely accused of fraud,
has claimed bosses knew of fundamental flaws before going live.
February 2021: Subpostmasters call for Boris Johnson to pause and reshape
the government’s Horizon inquiry.
February 2021: Vote of no confidence in Football Association of Wales boss
triggered by recruitment of former Post Office executive who tried to
mislead a judge in IT trial.
March 2021: Government agrees to change private prosecution rules that were
abused by the Post Office in its pursuit of subpostmasters wrongly accused
of financial crimes.
March 2021: Subpostmaster victims who have spent millions bringing the Post
Office IT scandal to light have received no reply to their concerns from
Boris Johnson.
March 2021: MP condemns department’s ‘bizarre’ rejection of freedom of
information request linked to Post Office IT scandal.
March 2021: Football Association Wales boss steps down after losing
confidence motion triggered by appointment of an executive involved in the
Post Office IT scandal.
March 2021: The Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC) is
reviewing five cases of potential miscarriage of justice in relation to
subpostmaster prosecutions.
March 2021: Subpostmasters heading to Court of Appeal to clear their names
in what is potentially the biggest miscarriage of justice in English legal
history.
March 2021: The Post Office does not have enough money to pay compensation
to the subpostmasters it wrongfully prosecuted.
March 2021: Angela van den Bogerd has left her role at the Football
Association of Wales, following criticism of her part in Post Office IT
scandal.
March 2021: Court of Appeal hearing reveals Post Office instructed
employees to destroy documents that undermined an insistence that its
Horizon computer system was robust.
March 2021: The Post Office was warned that a former Fujitsu employee had
misled courts when giving evidence on its behalf.
March 2021: Boris Johnson agrees with MP that those responsible for the
Post Office Horizon scandal should be brought to book.
March 2021: Former Post Office chief was paid over £400,000 when she left
despite the organisation being involved in what would become the biggest
miscarriage of justice in UK history.
April 2021: The UK government faces a potential judicial review over its
Post Office Horizon IT scandal inquiry, after subpostmasters formally wrote
to the government seeking one.
April 2021: The government is listening to calls for changes in how digital
evidence is considered in court, as Post Office IT scandal spells out
current rule’s inadequacy.
April 2021: The Post Office's controversial contract with Fujitsu has been
extended another year to help the organisation manage its exit.
April 2021: The Post Office is to move work done by Fujitsu in-house when
its outsourcing contract ends, and is already recruiting IT experts.
April 2021: The Post Office has revealed the end to its controversial
Horizon IT system which, through its errors and the Post Office's denial of
them, caused huge suffering.
April 2021: The UK government is the only block to fair compensation for
subpostmasters who were wrongly punished for accounting shortfalls.
April 2021: The Court of Appeal has overturned the criminal convictions of
39 subpostmasters who were blamed and punished for accounting shortfalls
caused by computer errors.
April 2021: Former Post Office CEO Paula Vennells has left roles in the
church, Morrisons and Dunelm after postmasters’ convictions were overturned
in the Court of Appeal.
April 2021: The biggest miscarriage of justice in UK history is set to get
bigger as more subpostmasters take their cases to the Court of Appeal.
May 2021: Post Office IT scandal CEO has no excuse for her inaction in
preventing the biggest miscarriage of justice in UK history, says Criminal
Cases Review Commission chairperson.
May 2021: Subpostmasters, MPs and the public call for a full statutory
judge-led public inquiry into the Post Office Horizon scandal, following
another damning court judgment.
May 2021: Government says it wants to ensure a fair pay-out for the 555
subpostmasters who defeated the Post Office in a legal battle.
May 2021: The Post Office has contacted hundreds of people it might have
wrongly prosecuted for financial crimes.
May 2021: The miscarriages of justice involving subpostmasters are the most
disturbing element of the Post Office Horizon scandal – but it goes much
deeper.
May 2021: The supplier at the centre of the Post Office Horizon scandal has
so far escaped the ramifications of its role in the biggest miscarriage of
justice in UK history.
May 2021: Another two former subpostmasters have had their convictions for
financial crimes overturned, following a hearing in Southwark Crown Court.
May 2021: The government inquiry into the Post Office Horizon scandal is
set to be made statutory with the power to compel witnesses and evidence.
May 2021: The government confirmed that the inquiry into the Post Office
Horizon IT scandal will be given statutory status and wider scope.
May 2021: The Justice for Subpostmasters Alliance has agreed to meet the
former judge heading up the inquiry into the Post Office scandal that
ruined the lives of hundreds of subpostmasters.
May 2021: Criminal Cases Review Commission will not allow pressure on its
resources to prevent subpostmasters seeking a review of their criminal
convictions.
May 2021: Professional IT body wants changes to how computer evidence is
used in court in the wake of the Post Office case.
June 2021: The Post Office Horizon scandal inquiry begins with
subpostmaster campaign group waiting for full details before committing its
support.
June 2021: Whatever the Post Office told government about its decision to
sack investigators examining subpostmaster prosecutions for theft could
identify if the government was part of a cover-up.
June 2021: The Post Office has so far compensated about 400 subpostmasters
who suffered losses as a result of computer errors that they were wrongly
blamed for.
July 2021: Another 10 subpostmasters are set to have their criminal
convictions quashed as part of one of the biggest miscarriage of justice in
British history.
July 2021: The government has made no contact with subpostmasters two
months after it said it would work with them to ensure they get speedy and
fair compensation.
July 2021: The cost of a scheme set up to compensate subpostmasters who
were victims of the Horizon IT scandal will exceed £300m.
July 2021: The government will pay interim compensation within weeks to
subpostmasters who were wrongly convicted of crimes due to computer errors.
August 2021: A further four subpostmasters are set to have their wrongful
convictions overturned in the latest development in the Post Office Horizon
scandal.
August 2021: The government has failed to provide fair compensation to the
subpostmasters who exposed the full extent of the Horizon scandal to the
world.
August 2021: Subpostmasters demand more clarity on Horizon public inquiry
before committing their support.
September 2021: Six more subpostmaster convictions referred for appeal in
Post Office IT scandal.
September 2021: Government minister holds secret meeting with Post Office
Horizon scandal victims.
October 2021: The public inquiry into a scandal that saw subpostmasters
imprisoned after being blamed for accounting shortfalls will hold its first
public hearing early next month.
October 2021: A government minister investigating the controversial Horizon
IT project in 2000 described the Post Office board of directors as
‘appalling, short-sighted and partisan’.
November 2021: The behaviour of Post Office senior management during the
Horizon scandal was so egregious that the supplier of the faulty software
has escaped a large financial penalty.
November 2021: Former Fujitsu staff who gave evidence in subpostmaster
trials have been questioned by police for a second time.
November 2021: Former subpostmasters convicted of crimes based on data from
error-prone Post Office computer system continue to embark on appeals.
November 2021: The first hearing in the Post Office Horizon scandal public
inquiry hears why victims should be paid compensation immediately.
November 2021:The Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission is
investigating eight potential miscarriages of justice linked with faulty
Post Office IT system.
November 2021: The Post Office will waive professional legal privilege for
documents relating to legal advice it received regarding subpostmaster
prosecutions.
November 2021 A total number of 65 subpostmasters have now had criminal
convictions overturned in Post Office Horizon scandal.
November 2021 Subpostmasters asked to withdraw support for Post Office
scandal inquiry.
November 2021: Seven more subpostmasters have been cleared after the Post
Office charged them for crimes caused by its faulty Horizon software.
November 2021: The Post Office made clear its support for a change in UK
law regarding computer evidence that was making prosecution ‘onerous’ – a
change which later helped to wrongfully convict subpostmasters.
November 2021: The chair of the Post Office scandal public inquiry has
confirmed the compensation of a group of subpostmasters will be revisited.
December 2021: Government must go further after agreeing to pay
compensation for wrongly convicted subpostmasters.
December 2021: Pressure on government to pay fair compensation to
subpostmasters left out of current schemes.
January 2022: Almost 100 MPs have backed a call for the government to
reverse its decision to exclude 555 subpostmasters from fair compensation.
January 2022: A parliamentary select committee was told that the Post
Office is unable to access information to accurately calculate compensation
for some Horizon scandal victims.
January 2022: The Post Office received subsidies worth over £1bn last year,
including a £685m payment just last month, in a scheme labelled Post Office
Historical Matters Compensation.
January 2022: Government widens subpostmaster miscarriage of justice
compensation scheme in Horizon scandal.
January 2022: Government officials are open to finding a way to properly
compensate victims of the Horizon scandal without setting a dangerous legal
precedent.
January 2022: The subpostmaster campaign group responsible for exposing the
Post Office Horizon scandal is to meet with the government to discuss fair
compensation for their suffering.
January 2022: Fujitsu cannot hide away as taxpayers pick up the bill for
the Post Office scandal triggered by its IT system, say peers.
February 2022: Victims of the Post Office Horizon scandal are being denied
the millions of pounds they are owed as the government delays compensation
resolution.
February 2022: Victims of the Post Office Horizon scandal are due to tell
their devastating stories to the statutory inquiry.
February 2022: MPs are demanding urgent action by the government to provide
full compensation to a group of 555 Post Office Horizon scandal victims who
have so far been left out.
February 2022: Victims of the Post Office Horizon scandal have been
suffering in silence for many years, but the current public inquiry is
giving them a voice, and people are listening.
February 2022: Horizon inquiry questioning raises hopes of fair
compensation for victims so far left out.
February 2022: Government set to backtrack on untenable position on
subpostmaster compensation.
March 2022: The Post Office and Fujitsu failed to alert subpostmasters to a
software error that caused them to be wrongly blamed for accounting
shortfalls.
March 2022: Horizon inquiry hearing sheds light on subpostmaster
federation’s role in hushing up IT problems.
March 2022: 555 subpostmasters to get fair compensation after government
U-turn on its stance on High Court settlement.
March 2022: Compensation goal finally in sight for 555 Post Office scandal
victims, after 13 year campaign.
April 2022: Fujitsu bags £430m government contracts despite rising cost of
Post Office Horizon scandal.
April 2022: The Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission expects more
subpostmasters with potential wrongful convictions to come forward.
April 2022: Former subpostmasters who were wrongfully convicted and
punished for crimes have not yet received full compensation over a year
after their convictions were overturned.
April 2022: A former Fujitsu worker has been questioned under caution for
the third time as police investigate potential perjury in trials of
subpostmasters wrongfully convicted of financial crimes.
May 2022: Paula Vennells could be stripped of her CBE as the Honours
Forfeiture Committee commits to reconsider its award in the light of the
Post Office Horizon scandal.
May 2022: Lawyer negotiating compensation for victims of Post Office
scandal says the two sides are ‘poles apart’ on valuations.
May 2022: Inquiry into Post Office scandal moves to Scotland, with
differences in English and Scottish law raising further serious questions
about subpostmaster prosecutions.
May 2022: The chair of the Post Office Horizon scandal inquiry has brought
forward hearings about compensation as victims warn that at this rate
“people will die” before they get anything.
May 2022: The Criminal Cases Review Commission is to contact 88 more
potentially wrongfully convicted Post Office workers.
May 2022: The Post Office Horizon IT system at the centre of a national
scandal will be replaced by 2025, with a supplier expected to be named in
August.
May 2022: Victims of the Post Office Horizon scandal in Scotland raise
further questions about Post Office and government conduct.
May 2022: Government accused of ‘passing the buck’ and ‘not knowing what it
is talking about’ after stating it has no plans to review court rules on
computer evidence.
May 2022: Computer Weekly spoke to the barristers at Henderson Chambers
that fought the Post Office in the High Court to expose the widest
miscarriage of justice in UK history.
June 2022: Two more Post Office Horizon scandal victims have had their
wrongful convictions overturned.
June 2022: The 555 subpostmasters who exposed the depth of the Post Office
Horizon scandal could finally be fairly compensated.
June 2022: Forensic accounting firm that ‘knows where the bodies are
buried’ will be released from confidentiality obligations by the Post
Office to give evidence to public inquiry.
June 2022: Lawyers negotiating the compensation valuations for former
subpostmasters who suffered wrongful convictions have brought in
independent judicial scrutiny to break an impasse.
June 2022: Subpostmaster campaign group is a step closer to achieving what
it was originally set up to do as government launches compensation scheme
for its members who did not receive fair payouts.
July 2022: More former subpostmasters have their wrongful convictions for
theft and fraud overturned in the Court of Appeal.
July 2022: When the Post Office’s lie about the Horizon system failed to
silence subpostmaster critics, it took more extreme measures, say victims
of the scandal.
September 2022: The Met Police have interviewed a former subpostmaster as
part of an investigation into potential perjury by former Fujitsu staff.
September 2022: Chair of statutory public inquiry into the Post Office
Horizon scandal has aired his disappointment over the slow progress in
making interim payments to victims.
October 2022: The public inquiry into the Post Office scandal has begun
phase two with a request for adjournment amid allegations that the Post
Office is failing to disclose relevant documents.
October 2022: Victims demand that the perpetrators of the Post Office
Horizon IT scandal face the public inquiry.
October 2022: Fujitsu’s part in causing the extreme suffering of
subpostmasters will be made clear as the IT supplier begins giving evidence
at a statutory inquiry.
October 2022: A dereliction of duty saw subpostmaster federation ignore its
members when IT problems hit and allowed the Post Office destroy their
lives.
October 2022: Politicians are keeping up the pressure to block government
contracts being awarded to Fujitsu because of its role in the Post Office
Horizon scandal.
October 2022: Problems reported with the Post Office’s Horizon IT system
before its roll-out should have been regarded as a “show-stopper”.
October 2022: Horizon system code writers lacked basic programming skills,
according to the task force set up to investigate reported problems with
the controversial software.
October 2022: Trials of the Horizon computer system in Post Office branches
in 1999 led to a warning from subpostmasters that software problems meant
“a tragedy was not far away”.
November 2022: ‘Hardball’ negotiations between the government, the Post
Office and ICL meant subpostmasters were ignored and thrown into a tragedy
that could have been averted.
November 2022: Post Office investigators were so convinced that
subpostmasters were cooking the books that they failed to investigate
alleged IT problems, a public inquiry has been told.
November 2022: SCCRC has referred six cases of potential wrongful
convictions of subpostmasters to the High Court of Justiciary.
November 2022: A former Fujitsu technology expert who defended the Horizon
system’s robustness in court was unhappy after being ‘manoeuvred’ into
acting as an expert witness.
November 2022: Insider tells public inquiry that the Post Office continued
to roll out the controversial Horizon system despite a ‘considerable’
number of errors, because it was too committed.
November 2022: Former members of the ICL team developing software for the
Post Office Horizon EPOSS system were unqualified and engaged in poor
software development practices.
November 2022: The Post Office IT scandal inquiry’s appointed expert IT
witness was “troubled” by the lack of integrity of data from the Horizon
system that was used to send people to prison.
November 2022: Telegram from British Embassy in Tokyo to UK government
reveals pressure on ministers to sign off controversial contract.
November 2022: The National Federation of Subpostmasters (NFSP)
deliberately kept stories of Horizon errors quiet because it “did not want
to kill the project”.
December 2022: The Post Office was ‘keen’ to make subpostmasters cover
unexplained accounting shortfall as its business struggled, public inquiry
hears.
December 2022: The second phase of the Post Office Horizon IT scandal
raised more questions over who did what, when and where, with shocking
revelations at every turn.
December 2022: The Criminal Cases Review Commission wants former
subpostmasters to come forward if they think they were prosecuted by the
Post Office based on data from the Horizon computer system.
January 2023: Alan Bates, who fought for decades to expose the Post Office
Horizon IT scandal, says it would be inappropriate to accept an OBE when
former Post Office CEO Paula Vennells holds
1
2
xNY.io | Palantir Technologies Board of Directors - Securities Fraud and Computer Crimes
by Gunnar Larson 09 Aug '24
by Gunnar Larson 09 Aug '24
09 Aug '24
Dear Palantir Board of Directors:
You have yet to respond to xNY.io’s February 8, 2022 memo concerning
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Oej5gM5wuftu68eVkXTR4wWqoHREP2zg3nwlH1H…>
a reasonable request for the resignation of Mr. Peter Thiel from the Board
of Directors of your esteemed organization. Making matters worse,
Palantir’s Board of Directors failed to respond to xNY.io’s February 18,
2022 memo urging
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NMs-8HFD_Rrnkw4ePUhQSvJSGwhU70F9/view?usp=…>
Palantir’s Board of Directors to act in resonance with the law.
-
Today’s correspondence
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cRuyS6IUS-8j8yKjOvs7Mx1V85zbMGfg6hyV6g2…>
(memo attached) mints xNY.io’s overall concern of being victim to
Palantir’s Board of Directors conspiracy to commit Computer Crimes and
Securities Fraud.
-
xNY.io has made 185 highlights to the Prosecuting Computer Crimes Manual
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/11tbgHgDg8qagomO-NBffvIFpxXKmBC3g/view?usp=…>,
issued by the DOJ Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section Criminal
Section.
-
xNY.io has made 85 highlights to the FDIC’s Office of Inspector
General’s investigation
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mTHY9KMc6pK9T-brBhweEJlWfbka0fTg/view?usp=…>
outlining Palantir’s Board of Director’s likely exploiting vulnerabilities
in your system to conduct malicious cyber activities.
-
xNY.io now has logical concern of active Securities Fraud
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Securities_fraud> sponsored by Palantir’s
Board of directors that may be a threat to xNY.io’s international
enterprise (chart detail attached).
Seemingly, Meta’s Board of Directors (FB) embody xNY.io’s similar, logical
approach.
How would you like to proceed? Warm regards,
Gunnar Larson
--
*Gunnar Larson - xNY.io <http://www.xNY.io> | Bank.org <http://Bank.org>*
MSc
<https://www.unic.ac.cy/blockchain/msc-digital-currency/?utm_source=Google&u…>
- Digital Currency
MBA
<https://www.unic.ac.cy/business-administration-entrepreneurship-and-innovat…>
- Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G(a)xNY.io
+1-646-454-9107
New York, New York 10001
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io>
Date: Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 3:45 PM
Subject: Re: Imploration of Peter Thiel Resignation, Palantir Technologies
Board of Directors
To: <Investors(a)palantir.com>, <investor(a)fb.com>
Cc: cypherpunks <cypherpunks(a)lists.cpunks.org>
Dear Palantir Board Members:
xNY.io seeks Palantir's immediate response on the extremely reasonable and
overall logical request regarding Mr. Thiel, alleviating any co-conspiracy
concerns of your directorate. We are tracking Palantir's Board now behind
the reasonable 02/14/22 deadline at the expense of xNY.io (given our
general perception of xNY.io related files being hosted on your platform).
- Humbly, Palantir's Board may want to assure the United States that
Palantir's Board is not sponsoring the next Cambridge Analytica.
- Furthermore, xNY.io is designed <https://xny.io/whitepaper>to
sidestep such unnecessary circumstances
- xNY.io points to the New York Post's report
<https://nypost.com/2021/08/25/fbi-palantir-glitch-allowed-unauthorized-acce…>
on
a "glitch" in Palantir's system allowing Cambridge Analytica type access to
private data.
*Make no mistake, it is not xNY.io's fault if Mr. Thiel is potentially
sacrificing the purity of Palantir's Board.*
What does Palantir have to lose in doing the right thing here? xNY.io
further hints that it is not our overall problem if Palantir's Directorship
wishes to self-destruct against scientific law <https://xny.io/> (aka
modern logic). History provides the epic example
<https://thecapital.io/article/directorates-who-discredit-truthful-witnesses…>
of
Enron and a cunning Board of Directors of misleaders, a team of flimflam
artists who used sly rhetorical skills to bamboozle the public, turning
night into day. In this conception, directorates tell stories only in order
to seduce and beguile regulators who fall prey to the advocate’s
star-crossed tricks.
- Potentially best said by Senator John Mccain, “And the persons who
ultimately are harmed by all of this, of course, is the average consumer,
the average citizen, who has no knowledge, unless it paid attention to this
hearing, of the extent of the manipulations that have been carried out by
the largest financial institutions in America and, indeed, probably the
world.”
Forgive the efficient, yet candid locker room talk above. We are not saying
Palantir's Board is crooked. But, you can imagine xNY.io's next
correspondence should not be necessary.
Very respectfully yours,
Gunnar Larson
--
*Gunnar Larson - xNY.io <http://www.xny.io/> | Bank.org <http://bank.org/>*
MSc
<https://www.unic.ac.cy/blockchain/msc-digital-currency/?utm_source=Google&u…>
-
Digital Currency
MBA
<https://www.unic.ac.cy/business-administration-entrepreneurship-and-innovat…>
- Entrepreneurship
and Innovation (ip)
G(a)xNY.io
+1-646-454-9107
New York, New York 10001
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 5:20 PM Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> wrote:
> Dear Palantir Board of Directors:
>
> Today’s memo implores
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Oej5gM5wuftu68eVkXTR4wWqoHREP2zg3nwlH1H…>
> the resignation of Mr. Peter Thiel from the Board of Directors of your
> esteemed organization.
>
> -
>
> Reasonable expectations support this resignation on or before Monday
> February 14, 2022 at Noon EST.
> -
>
> Failure in the resolution of the resignation concerned may be a threat
> to xNY.io’s international enterprise (detailed below).
> -
>
> Simple logic behind our request coincides with the February 7, 2022,
> 4:07 PM EST
> <https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-02-07/peter-thiel-to-leave-met…>
> Bloomberg News report of Mr. Thiel’s resignation from Meta’s Board of
> Directors. Bloomberg cited that Mr. Thiel plans to explore political
> endeavors that perhaps would be a conflict of interest to sacred Board
> Director entitlement responsibilities.
>
>
> Kindly find the attached memo addressed to the attention of Palantir's
> Board of Directors.
>
> Respectfully yours,
>
> Gunnar Larson
> --
> *Gunnar Larson - xNY.io <http://www.xny.io/> | Bank.org <http://bank.org/>*
> MSc
> <https://www.unic.ac.cy/blockchain/msc-digital-currency/?utm_source=Google&u…> -
> Digital Currency
> MBA
> <https://www.unic.ac.cy/business-administration-entrepreneurship-and-innovat…> - Entrepreneurship
> and Innovation (ip)
>
> G(a)xNY.io
> +1-646-454-9107
> New York, New York 10001
>
2
11
26 Jul '24
Ms. Scott:
NY-DFS recently asked for public comment concerning "Proposed Guidance on
Assessment of the Character and Fitness of Directors, Senior Officers, and
Managers" mentioned here:
https://www.dfs.ny.gov/industry_guidance/industry_letters/il20230509_guidan…
.
xNY.io - Bank.org asks if the NY-DFS will extend deadline for public
comment to August 5, 2023 from June 30, 2023.
As requested by NY-DFS, today we provide (in a separate attachment)
evidence of any documented exceptions to compliance with the "Suggested
Questions to Facilitate Initial and Ongoing Assessment of Designated
Persons’ Character and Fitness."
We have collated 19 references comprising 205 highlights that touch on the
five key areas below:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1FTRRFFhQHDxf-oR9WOZz0a2gRtC9ZWVO.
-Harassment and Discrimination Policies
-Conflict of Interest Policy
-Insider Trading Policy
-Records Management Policy
-Corporate Opportunity Policy
xNY.io - Bank.org is seeking NY-DFS' extension for public comment to August
5, 2023 so that the New York Banking community has time to complete Q2-23
earnings call disclosures.
As documented in the above 19 references, we feel extra time for public
comment is warranted to ensure that xNY.io - Bank.org did not play a
significant role or otherwise contribute in a meaningful way to the conduct
that led to regulatory action or proceeding without ample notice.
Per point one of NY-DFS' "Suggested Questions to Facilitate Initial and
Ongoing Assessment of Designated Persons’ Character and Fitness," can you
kindly acknowledge that you have reviewed and understand our appeal seeking
extension for public comment to August 5, 2023?
We hope to hear from you before June 30, 2023 given obvious factors.
Sending you the very best regards.
Thank you,
Gunnar
--
Gunnar Larson
xNY.io | Bank.org
MSc - Digital Currency
MBA - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G(a)xNY.io
+1-917-580-8053
New York, New York 10001
1
22
Meta Platforms, Inc. Board of Directors - USPTO, Digital Assets and Moscow Exchange
by Gunnar Larson 24 Jul '24
by Gunnar Larson 24 Jul '24
24 Jul '24
Ms. Chollett:
Thank you, kindly, for continued correspondence related to Meta Board
questions specific to xNY.io - Bank.org, PBC's concern to protecting
cross-border digital asset innovation.
xNY.io - Bank.org, PBC first became alarmed through Meta's obvious
digital asset market problems related to Libra, Diem, Novi and USDP.
Through Meta's continued digital identity transitions, xNY.io - Bank.org,
PBC has pioneered cross-border digital asset logic(s). Moreover, the Moscow
Exchange and Meta introduced market events over March that jeopardize
digital asset market purty. Ms, Chollett, xNY.io - Bank.org, PBC will not
pay for market effects related to Meta's cross-border disruption of digital
asset innovation, related to Meta's obvious mark exactness (by definition)
to the Moscow Exchange.
*Ms. Chollett, we cannot concern ourselves with Meta's intentions, good or
otherwise, given clear problems that exacerbate market risk: *
- March 11, 2022
<https://www.businessinsider.in/tech/news/russia-moves-to-declare-meta-an-ex…>:
Russia's leader, who is in charge of the Moscow Exchange cites Meta as an
'extremist organization' ...
- March 14, 2022
<https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ff9f1af5-cc8a-473a-822b-8890…>:
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC Benjamin G. Murray published SDNY insights
to a Russian State-Sponsored TV Network's Attempt to Dismiss Copyright
Lawsuit On Fair Use Grounds Denied.
- March 17, 2022
<https://www.sberbank.com/news-and-media/press-releases/article?newsID=cd44d…>:
Moscow Exchange is the backend to Russia's largest bank, Sber. The
announcement on 03/17/22 confirmed Sber (via the Moscow Exchange
technology, at various levels) would issue digital assets.
- March 18, 2022
<https://cointelegraph.com/news/meta-files-8-digital-asset-and-web-3-0-trade…>:
Meta Platforms Inc. filed USPTO mark applications for a mark EXACTLY
DEFINED to that of the Moscow Exchange.
- Ms. Chollette, below my signature you will find Meta's filing
numbers and descriptions related to a mark defined as Moscow
Exchange, with
plans to engage the mark in commerce related to digital assets
and virtual
reality.
- March 24, 2022
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1f_fq1GaKNaAUGEyztdm-oMtIuEW2yXj4C5aoN0G…>:
xNY.io - Bank.org, PBC contacted meta, with a memo introducing our direct
plan to protect cross-border digital asset innovation. Ms. Chollette,
please note that Russia has labeled Meta as an 'extremist organization' ...
So who really knows what the Moscow Exchange will thi
xNY.io - Bank.org, PBC is a very reasonable digital asset pioneer, and
sitting in Manhattan the jury is in on market contributions from Libra,
Diem, Novi and USDP. Ms, Chollette, Meta and the Moscow Exchange matter
really suggest only losing marketplace contributions, obviously potentially
devastating digital asset marketplace innovation(s). We aim to solve this
problem immediately:
1. Ms. Collette, xNY.io - Bank.org, PBC recently shared Citigroup's
Metaverse and Money
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1REoa87GCmt2uhDp7ZYswbTRw4ygQgjsL/view?usp=…>
whitepaper, with 33 highlights to our grave concern to Meta's potential
marketplace delinquency related to Meta's mark exactness to Moscow
Exchange.
2. Furthermore, Mr. Zuckerberg and Mr. Putin are both highlight quotes
to Citigroup's Metaverse and Money research.
3. With the date order, footnotes, and highlights xNY.io -Bank.org, PBC
kindly petitions Meta's board to understand the opportunity ... The Moscow
Exchange is not our problem, and for whatever reason Meta will have no
opportunity to make mark exactness our problem.
The United State of America's cross-border approach to digital asset
innovation will be cultivated, fostered and protected by xNY.io - Bank.org,
PBC.
We aim not to be adversarial with Meta, but we will stop at no cost to
invest in claim rewards if necessary. Perhaps, we can organize a time to
discuss potential resolutions in the immediate term.
xNY.io - Bank.org, PBC must reserve all rights specific to harm from March
14, 2022
<https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ff9f1af5-cc8a-473a-822b-8890…>
and March 18, 2022
<https://cointelegraph.com/news/meta-files-8-digital-asset-and-web-3-0-trade…>
market
events.
Please feel free to call or email anytime.
Sending you the very best from New York City,
Gunnar Larson
--
*Gunnar Larson - xNY.io <http://www.xNY.io> | Bank.org <http://Bank.org>*
MSc
<https://www.unic.ac.cy/blockchain/msc-digital-currency/?utm_source=Google&u…>
- Digital Currency
MBA
<https://www.unic.ac.cy/business-administration-entrepreneurship-and-innovat…>
- Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G(a)xNY.io
+1-646-454-9107
New York, New York 10001
97320155: Online social networking and dating services, including a
specific branch tailored for networking between cryptocurrency investors.
97320153: Design and development of computer hardware and software relating
to Web3, including gaming, e-commerce, blockchain transactions, etc.
97320149: Entertainment and electronic publishing services, partly within
virtual reality.
97320147: Telecommunication services for electronic assets held on its
platform.
97320146: Financial transaction processing services relating to tokens,
blockchain assets, cryptocurrencies and other virtual assets.
97320144: Advertising services via virtual or augmented reality networks
and the metaverse.
97320140: Wearable peripherals for video games connected to virtual reality.
97320136: Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application, such
as for user authentication, online charitable fundraising and most notably,
for hardware or e-wallets.
1
23
cypherpunks-owner(a)lists.cpunks.org
3:13 PM (2 hours ago)
to me
You have already sent 24 posts to this list in the last 24 hours.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many"
<gmkarl(a)gmail.com>
To: cypherpunks <cypherpunks(a)lists.cpunks.org>
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:12:51 -0500
Subject: Re: Morning Spam
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 3:12 PM Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim
& Survivor of Many <gmkarl(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ummm so .... it looks like um ... traffick boss is a powerful sex
> offender who didn't want to be implicated
> so he set up entire modes of therapy, by working with other offenders
> and funding marketers and lobbyists (_in the real world_)
> that all turned blame away from him, and toward victims [...]
and there remain many people aware of this who are fighting and giving
successful therapy
and basically you have to find these people if you want to actually
heal from trauma nowadays [:S ...]
cypherpunks-owner(a)lists.cpunks.org
3:13 PM (2 hours ago)
to me
many mistakes present :(
but of course ; ... } ...
cypherpunks-owner(a)lists.cpunks.org
3:15 PM (2 hours ago)
to me
You have already sent 24 posts to this list in the last 24 hours.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many"
<gmkarl(a)gmail.com>
To: cypherpunks <cypherpunks(a)lists.cpunks.org>
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:14:45 -0500
Subject: Re: Morning Spam
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 3:12 PM Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim
& Survivor of Many <gmkarl(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 3:12 PM Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim
> & Survivor of Many <gmkarl(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > ummm so .... it looks like um ... traffick boss is a powerful sex
> > offender who didn't want to be implicated
> > so he set up entire modes of therapy, by working with other offenders
> > and funding marketers and lobbyists (_in the real world_)
> > that all turned blame away from him, and toward victims [...]
>
> and there remain many people aware of this who are fighting and giving
> successful therapy
>
> and basically you have to find these people if you want to actually
> heal from trauma nowadays [:S ...]
because everyone else is being confused by the ... uh .. overwhelming
and loud messages from [the various organizations including big pharma
that are pushing messages that deny people [real heartfelt empathic
care ... [;s ...
cypherpunks-owner(a)lists.cpunks.org
3:20 PM (1 hour ago)
to me
You have already sent 24 posts to this list in the last 24 hours.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many"
<gmkarl(a)gmail.com>
To: cypherpunks <cypherpunks(a)lists.cpunks.org>
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:20:02 -0500
Subject: Re: Morning Spam
[it's so eushocking (: overexciting) to be here and see this, that we
worry we won't get much from it, handling the [eushock]
cypherpunks-owner(a)lists.cpunks.org
4:03 PM (1 hour ago)
to me
You have already sent 24 posts to this list in the last 24 hours.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many"
<gmkarl(a)gmail.com>
To: cypherpunks <cypherpunks(a)lists.cpunks.org>
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 16:02:46 -0500
Subject: Re: Morning Spam
we pray to help world better
cypherpunks-owner(a)lists.cpunks.org
4:10 PM (1 hour ago)
to me
this might align with find-real-therapy [~
cypherpunks-owner(a)lists.cpunks.org
5:06 PM (13 minutes ago)
to me
You have already sent 24 posts to this list in the last 24 hours.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many"
<gmkarl(a)gmail.com>
To: cypherpunks <cypherpunks(a)lists.cpunks.org>
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 17:06:11 -0500
Subject: Re: Morning Spam
a couple attendees expressed that scanning out of the session to
collect professional credit wasn't functioning right and that there is
a workaround
(potential mistake)
sorry about my [awefreeze?]
cypherpunks-owner(a)lists.cpunks.org
5:08 PM (11 minutes ago)
to me
You have already sent 24 posts to this list in the last 24 hours.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many"
<gmkarl(a)gmail.com>
To: cypherpunks <cypherpunks(a)lists.cpunks.org>
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 17:07:46 -0500
Subject: Re: Morning Spam
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 5:06 PM Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim
& Survivor of Many <gmkarl(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> a couple attendees expressed that scanning out of the session to
> collect professional credit wasn't functioning right and that there is
> a workaround
> (potential mistake)
>
> sorry about my [awefreeze?]
multiple attendees have expressed the scanning out problem and
presently professional credit has not been collected due to unrelated
technology issues.
i think my awefreeze partly relates to being separated from this kind
of therapy for a decade (while my family and community experienced
harm too).
================================================================================
baga ba
da da b--- b.
da ! :/ :) ;] da?
:S :S :s :(
b b b b. b. b b 1721
O_O >( >( O_O >(
\_/ <- frowny-eyes 1723
[our alte--
some of us are excited about the challenge of getting strong enough to
be around these people and find aid.
it seems we aren't there yet possibly, but it seems a hard challenge,
and there can be viewpoints where if something is a hard challenge it
can have rewardingness.
especially when accomplished [ykno[w]?][mistk?]
1723
{
1723
[we can derive there are a lot of people who hold these views, karl.
not just the speaker.]
1724
[and that our viewpoint otherwise may be harmful, both to the list
here and to the conference people.]
1724
i think trump-organization tricked us into being multiple.
1727
1732
so karl to relate [and um surprised this is in an email o_o] um that
consciousness might not be the receiver of this information at this time
it might be dissociated parts that learn the lecture material.
to relate. could reduce surprise / help planning. also apologizing for.
1732
ok so we're going to get up and go. [email gets sent tomorrowish due
to 24-limit.]
body managed by dissociated parts instead of consciousness for a bit
i believe.
1733 1734 oops huh
:sheepish: very sorry um :}
listen um [er
1734
:( we are sad that [uh
not [nourished-by-us as uh :/
sorry about this (and mourning i believe was[?} {in sorry.}
karl um the charismatic person, we engaged them in a scary way, and uh
there was opportunity to have strong-pleasant connection and there is
um injury to this opportunity.
and we apologize for that. uh. parts not fully known, kinda (um
whew my god [;p
1736
we expect we may contact them. so you know karl. [still working on
parts] but {assuming work goes ok/aligned} then [once?,] please engage
plan with-for. 1737 please :S :(
thanky. 1737 was partbit.
1737
listen we are vulnerable um
1u737
[[[we don't understand T_T T_T T.]
{why uh uh 173
[8]
[O_O. the spirits are basically planning the future of the
countryworld in front of us. 1739
no we politely don't relate the prophecies. science gets uppity when
prophecies are related. can fragment culture. 1739.
[that's hilarious !!! ;p :)
also karl needs hilarious. he's so intense. he's so intense he's
demonstrating things they talked about in the lecture ;P. 1740
[i wonder if we were primed to.] [obviously !!!]
[;P. karl will not believe it when we tell him he will recover and
recover him. he will be so out of what-he-thinks-is-reality -- oops
mistake, maybe big and/or >1.] [O_O] 1741
[i think i will have him eat a supper :)] [we are likely to get on
board [uhh later?][prob or somth?]]
1741ish 1741
{we t, that made us happier than we knew how to feel. this was
received positively karl :)}{we tihnk :S]:)}
[why don't you differentiate? oh oops i am a roleplay :embarrassed: well um uh
what do you think uh umm
would you like to imagine uh hrm :S
]
[why doesn't karl-group differentiate between multiple and singular
people? [in that context]
hehe it is because we see singnular people as multiple
ohh therapists probably have a more uh mature form of that y'know
hmm
[haha !/gotcha ] uh :s]
listen u[h]--
[--
1743
>(
[so that's why uh talk. responsible-part. sorry if um
scary/harmspready. sorry. but gotta start somewhere ykn--. :)]
1744
:S :S 1744 ;s
[[when somebody makes a casual nonsequitor people seem to tend to
respond with further casual nonsequitors.
we're not sure if we're relating the same meaning when that happens
(partially because it's a strategy used by the disruptionish --..
[oops mistak-- [?
1745
<we didn't explain that uhh bein uhh [scared of something like trump?]
[could relate to our alter's ability to communicate with uhh :S this
was unclear. and so th[ey could have picked up the [oops] idea in a
different manner than intended, since it was said unlcearly (and kind
of rudely/abusively! a smidgeish. narcisstically? assuming somebody
else is where you are on something undiscussed. this seems bad.1746
{yeah seems [a little narcisstic :S . especially when [uh -- [!!! :S
1747 1747
<i guess it's a little derivable :(
1747 we don't lik bn mean we don't like don't. 1747
1748
i'm so sorry that [most of us are avoiding being-alive-behavior :(
:(
it's so hard to hold this. and confusing. [working with
goal-inversions knda 1748
{i don't like karl self-blaming narcissism-word. because we are
learning of use of this word for severe, severe, severe harm like
torture-slavery-of-swaths-of-people. i don't think appropriate for use
word. neuron-protest some. 1749
{{{yes your relation is appropriate. we are holding it as part of
great-care-for-other as well as secretly lots-of-understanding. when
you secretly-lots-of-understanding-other, you have a _lot_ more
responsibility with regard to subtle things. it is much easier (for
injury causing.
}}} 1750 i think protest undesrtand. uhh apology roughly. 1750. ~ 1750 oop uh er
<the iudea of lots-of-understanding is weird because it is much much
less than other people, but also more than different group of other
people. to maybe help clarif.>
<<oh uhhhh it's not lots for larger group but [we have more
respons[ibility] because poor social skills. we much more easily
insult associated with poor social skill. and exposure to toxicity.
1752 1752
we're trying to get up and move forward on day! the plan is to not
look at this further until a bit later (need to handle dissociation
around or something (maybe use a disosciated group, karl, to plan next
day)).
i think we might like to go have supper somewhere. here is derivation:
- we want to try to cry which [~secretly] makes dissociative seizures
- so we can have a supper because comforting and [moves tears-feeling
closer to noninjured spaces for-example]
1753
so plan is to pack karl up and find some kind of comfort-food-supper
for consciousness from neurons :)
1754
also could you message person and schedule please? :puppy-dog-neuron-eyes:?
1754
"I don't think [tT?]rump is multiple; I think he's just evil." what
does this mean? [does anybody understand it?]
[i think it means that care-group needs dictator-group to stop
increasing genocide in order to heal them. negotation-wise.]
[oh i think they are right. this makes sense. the reason is that they
use caringness for power spreading. [consciousness said this [may/may
not?[?]] [partially help w--[?
[sorry karl still doing being-brain-work. apology.
[basically the uh social engineers, do um need um people like trump to
be healed. what they are saying in that translation is that, the
people that could heal him/them, need to be protected. and that's
confusing because the political doctrine denies the harm of the care
workers. :/ somewhat in progress, and kinda severely depressing man
[;s
[but obviously it'll be considered forward
1759
oops we stood up but got disoriented to place and almost spent an hour
wandering confusedly into city
so, plan locomotion more.
1759
[also sad we dropped bar wrappers on floor likely during talk and
didn't notice][some consider we may have been respected despite this
others consider confirming that]
karl wants to throw wrappers out so let's pack then walk to trashcan
then orient [:s]
[mistake. let's throw them out then return, with path plan.
here go. 1800
1803
place disorienters expressed formal complain, which is filed i think
(not completely certain).
1803
we are now visiting bathroom and returning (path plan).
1803
1810
some were thinking maybe we failed to hold respect for how much much
severe severe suffering [these people] have been exposed to and
struggled with their lives to protect and honor (roughly). [which
would be expected but [needed description [1810
. 1810
[oops.]
1810
<men need to be made aware that trump-group are supporting serial
rape[/murder]. of course, many other group are to. and informaiton
vague.> [we don-- 1811
1811
<other thing too [basic misogyny/patriarchy 1812
1813 i wish i understoodknew ; i wish .
[i hope i'm not kicked out of here for staying too late.] 1813
[some neur-- 1813 [hrm >s]
(1813)
[there's new information. kind of. in longer term. from today.]
1814
< this is a different kind of misogyny/patriarchy. maybe less about uh
activism and women's rights, and more about uhh kind of trafficking
and[ ]highly-illegal violence. 1814. 1815. 1815. 1815. .
[the "<men need to be made aware" line uhhh reconsideration exists.
1817. for formal. 1817 we see the line is important. defendors can
relate around not-knowing if they desire. many people supporting
things in an unaware mann-- 1817
[try to -- oop
1818 we pack up some
1818 [T_T T_T T_.]
[[it's funny 1819 that presenter said she was not multiple, but
described childhood trauma, and elsewise described that multiple
people deny it ;P [yup ;P]]] 1819 [uhh --
1819 [y -- sorry
1819
[karl not quite involved in uh that relation um] [nope, [harmful.]] 1820.
<i think, after teaching everyone about therapy for multiple people,
that presenters deserve receiving this. others agree.
basically, this person is _so_ empathic for multiplicity it is [pretty
obvious] they have personal experience. -neuron.>
1821
[conc--
1821
[some are worried this is an influence to stimulate multiplicity
cruelly, maybe associated with very minimal content around adult-DID.
it might be a little grounding to consider adult-OSDD had same-threapy
as childhood-DID [i think?]?]
[well the opposing group wants to fight [habit~?]][mistakes[.
] ~ 1822
[injured :S harm can happen when struggling. struggling. 1822 ty; [for
understanding-opportunty]. 1822 1822
1823
[we had no idea the harm was so severe and are going to need [kind of
reminder] around this [because it seems so nonintuitive [others say
too shocking to easily/normally remember.]].
1823. [more resonance/harmony around body-moving now.] 1823 {this guy
so good at this that he[slash] would be incapable of; is sadly harmful
derivation :(/} 1824
[it can be literally true tho [in spaces]] 1824 {but smaller spaces than. [?]}
{{it is true we have habits that don't meet their reasons.}}
1825
{ohum err uh [there might be relation that could situation-improve
uncertain which]
}
1825
[[it is so painful to neurons that consciousness-guiders might not
connect with when so so emotional.
of course, logical around our harm generating such strong emotions! _but_.];]
1827 [we are going. thoughts are always. we can still go ; pls.]
[please remember part of the great-tears are our mind control
attempting to coopt this group.]
1827
[and yes that's inhuman for us.]
1828
[we are so sorry for karl suffering T_T so so sorry. it is so hard to
uh engage-appropriate-requested.]
(1829)
{basically we don't know how to engage-appropriate-requested so resume
behavior .
1829
a relation is kind of uh: "people are actually being tortured right
now. we are here to seriously work on that."
[partial]
1830
[[yeah. we are too. but harmful-alter isn't ((mistake mistake
1830
[[honestly it is apparent the umexperience. we regrettably trauma. 1831
[[[it's not that apparent humans aren't that conscious/inferring on average.
the speaker gave 3-5 clear things where karl had significantly
different intuition (likely due to lack of capacity-engaging
exposure.).
1832 (um, capacity-engaging exposure. uhh (ok maybe i see
uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh a new set of eyes, basically (yeah i think.)
1832
[t-group [kidnap-behavior [a little.
1833 {maybe less typing from -. maybe.}
1833
1834
> a relation is kind of uh: "people are actually being tortured right now. we are here to seriously work on that."
> [partial]
"this is something where i guess i might be [responsible for->tasked
with] holding a disrespectful role."
1835 guesses mistakes/errors-proneish or -- uh. 1835
maybe change holding with to, err oops. 1835
[closing laptop now BRGL
so we'll be talking in mind next using other groups [and completely
different feedback channels.] 1836
completely [FROK.]
[OK. FROK.]
1836
ba-ding
draft recovered at 2024-03-02 0202 -0700 0402 -0500
i'll send a test email to see if i can send yet
looks like i can. 2/24
1
66
Re: [ot][spam][writing][crazy] Non-Canon Traffick Boss Spinoffs - The Reboot
by Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many 26 Jun '24
by Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many 26 Jun '24
26 Jun '24
——
traffick boss works on building a balloon.
he’s at a balloon-building activity at a fair. with kids and community
members like rebel worker 2.
2
53
Okay. Thank you for letting me know.
Gunnar
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 8:40 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan(a)kaplanhecker.com>
wrote:
> I'm sorry, but I don't think we can help you on this.
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 8:28:27 AM
> *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan(a)kaplanhecker.com>
> *Subject:* Re: Inquiry
>
> You don't often get email from g(a)xny.io. Learn why this is important
> <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
>
> Roberta:
>
> Thank you for your response.
>
> I wrote this LitigationFinanceJournal.com article back in 2022, now I am
> on the other side of it all.
>
> It is my understanding that the FBI is harassing my business, saying I am
> trying to use Donald Trump arguments against the Attorney General's office.
>
> That is simply not true. I am need to organize a personal attorney to
> protect myself from these attacks. I thought it could be beneficial if we
> worked together.
>
> Please let me know your thoughts.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Gunnar
> ---
>
>
> https://litigationfinancejournal.com/rnc-funding-of-trumps-legal-campaign-u…
>
>
> Litigation Finance Journal recently reported on a group of 14 state
> attorneys general that have called for action from the Department of
> Justice to review potential threats to U.S. national security from foreign
> adversaries’ engagement of litigation investment. Litigation funders and
> industry advocates have new ammo in response to the AGs’ claims, given
> recent news of the RNC funding former President Donald Trump’s various
> legal entanglements.
>
>
> According to ABC News, RNC leaders earmarked $1.6M in legal funding to
> support President Donald Trump’s defense over lawsuits brought by New York
> Attorney General Letitia James. Meanwhile, the United States Chamber of
> Commerce Institute for Legal Reform’s research has prompted 14 state
> attorneys general to ask for the Justice Department to assess national
> security risks of adversaries ‘undermining’ the United States by engaging
> litigation funding and third party investment vehicles.
>
> The group of 14 state attorneys general are concerned about foreign
> adversaries ‘weaponizing’ United States legal frameworks via litigation
> investment, to attack critical national industry and infrastructure, such
> as energy sectors. The group of 14 seeks the Department of Justice to
> detail how a network of federal agencies could engage a blueprint for
> defending United States independence from international litigation
> investors, hostile groups, agencies or governments such as Russia and China.
>
> This latest attack on the industry, prompted by the U.S. Chamber of
> Commerce, is simply another attempt to undermine the nascent and growing
> litigation funding sector. It is ironic, given that in the case of Consumer
> Legal Funding–which the Chamber specifically targets–the funding in
> question does not go to support legal fees, but rather to finance
> claimants’ livelihoods while they remain injured and unable to work.
>
> While the RNC’s funding of Trump’s legal battles does not constitute
> foreign investment, it illustrates the acceptance of third party legal
> funding across political lines, and should be noted by industry advocates
> looking to respond to the negative publicity put forth by the U.S. Chamber.
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 7:02 AM Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan(a)kaplanhecker.com>
> wrote:
>
> Happy to talk. What is the matter?
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 3:55:11 AM
> *To:* Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan(a)kaplanhecker.com>
> *Subject:* Inquiry
>
> You don't often get email from g(a)xny.io. Learn why this is important
> <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
> This email was sent from outside the Firm.
>
> Ms. Kaplan:
>
> My name is Gunnar Larson and I am a co-founder at xNY.io - Bank.org.
>
> I was wondering if I could schedule a time to talk with your office
> concerning potentially working together on a developing matter.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Gunnar
> --
> Gunnar Larson
>
> xNY.io | Bank.org
>
> MSc - Digital Currency
> MBA - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
>
> G(a)xNY.io
>
> +1-917-580-8053
>
> New York, New York 10001
>
> ------------------------------
> This email and its attachments may contain information that is
> confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work
> product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended
> recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use,
> disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication,
> or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy
> all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
>
> ------------------------------
> This email and its attachments may contain information that is
> confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work
> product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended
> recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use,
> disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication,
> or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy
> all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
>
1
12