January 2024 - cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

Memo #4 - Goldman Sachs Deferred Prosecution Agreement
by Gunnar Larson 19 Jan '24

19 Jan '24

March 10, 2022 BY ELECTRONIC MAIL Mr. John Marzulli United States Department of Justice Eastern District of New York 271 Cadman Plaza East Brooklyn New York, 11201 John.Marzulli(a)usdoj.gov Re: Memo #4 - Goldman Sachs Deferred Prosecution Agreement Dear Mr. Marzulli: The Department of Justice has yet to respond to Memo #1, Memo #2 and Memo #3 with our recent inquiry to the 1Malaysia Development Berhad Deferred Agreement. Goldman Sachs' Deferred Prosecution Agreement <https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/goldman-sachs-resolves-foreign-bribery…> with the United States of America is in potential breach, with ethical enforcement being concerned. Memo #4 aims to associate the malfeasance in Malaysia with war crimes of aggression (in the planning, initiation, or execution of a large-scale and serious act of aggression), leveraging the world’s only military divided capital city Nicosia, Cyprus. 1. Additionally, Memo #4 aims to earn the DOJ’s assessment of New York State’s regulatory marketplace manipulation deriving the war crime against peace, related to the planning, preparation, initiation, waging or participation in a common plan or conspiracy related to a war of aggression, which can only apply in relation to international armed conflict. 2. In this case, the first challenge is to observe and consider the simple idea that the DOJ’s Deferred Prosecution Agreement with Goldman Sachs alone, through means of regulatory arbitrage naively fails to recognize the ‘cause and effect’ relationship at play at the inception of Memo #4’s assertion of war crimes. 3. Even with the best of intentions, perhaps unknowingly the DOJ may be amplifying the effect of potential war crimes by indirectly supplementing the root cause of the problem and financial model of the Deferred Agreement being self-policing. Mr. Marzulli, there has been an active United Nations peacekeeping mission in Cyprus since the 1964 Turkish military invasion and occupation of the northern third of Cyprus. Only Turkey recognises the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, while there is broad recognition that the ongoing military presence constitutes occupation of territories that are under Turkish military control. - The graduate education behind Memo #4 is a product of the University of Nicosia’s (UNIC) main campus, located adjacent to the United Nations Buffer Zone that separates the invaded Turkish Republic of North Cyprus and the Republic of Cyprus, which joined the European Union in 2004. - Memo #4 is also a product of United Nations consultancy, based at its Manhattan headquarters, where (today, what is now xNY.io - Bank.org) was credited with increasing the breadth and accessibility of reference content from the world’s most important multinational organization. - Memo #4’s subject of war crimes has preeminent association with such projects as the Audio Visual Library of International Law. Over the following sections, Memo #4 will provide a detailed timeline that would constitute real concern of the war crime of aggression yielding the war crime against peace in active war conflict in the world’s only military divided capital, funded from Manhattan Island. The Bank of Cyprus and Illegal Short Selling Irregularities of Turkey’s Markets Mr. Marzulli, turn this matter as we will, and look at it from any side whatsoever, and it presents the appearance of a cross-border act of aggression. Goldman Sachs’ potential disrespect to the Deferred Agreement’s core values has cultivated new crimes that aim to manipulate cross-border war crime regulatory frameworks. - On April 02, 2021 the Financial Times reported that Turkey fined Goldman Sachs over alleged irregularities in short selling, just a week after foreign investors pulled $1.9B from the country’s stock and bond markets. Turkey’s Capital Markets Board said that Goldman Sachs was among 10 securities firms that had placed orders for short selling without proper notification, violating rules enacted previously that temporarily prohibited such transactions. - On April 20, 2021 the CyprusMail (Cyprus’ only English Language daily newspaper) reported Goldman Sachs International acted as Global Coordinators and Dealer Managers in a $330M bond issuance for the Bank of Cyprus. Given the active military conflict in Cyprus, Memo #4 notes that there is one place on the planet you are not supposed to do this sort of thing. Furthermore, the DOJ’s Deferred Agreement with Goldman Sachs may have been tainted with the potential war crime of aggression, risking international peace and the lives of United Nations peacekeepers, while jeopardizing the United States of America’s financial security. Concern of New York Prime Bank Instrument Fraud and Marketplace Manipulation The United States Department of the Treasury warns that Prime Bank Instrument Fraud schemes have attracted significant international attention, since individuals and organizations have lost billions of dollars worldwide. "Prime Bank Instrument Fraud" is the general term given to prime bank fraud schemes that go by many different names. During April 2021, Goldman Sachs could not in good faith (and, plausible deniability) make any reasonable claim of holding a pristine relationship with Turkey’s Central Bank or with Cyprus’ largest financial institutions, given the 1Malaysia Development Berhad scandal and then pending Deferred Prosecution Agreement with the United States of America. - Memo #4 suggests that Goldman Sachs developed a Prime Bank Instrument Fraud program to level out yo-yo market dynamics caused by failed marketplace manipulation exercises in Turkey and Cyprus. - Systematic bank fraud and/or marketplace manipulation of any kind between Turkey and Cyprus could constitute the war crime of aggression. - Furthermore, Memo #4 argues that Goldman Sachs may have tried to bambooze governments in New York, Cyprus and Turkey through regulatory arbitrage loopholes, while Goldman seemingly may have not considered the totality of such actions as war crimes. Turkey has the highest inflation in Europe. It has the second-highest rate of inflation among emerging markets, just behind Argentina. It has the 13th highest inflation rate in the world, ranking it between South Sudan and Nigeria. After Goldman Sachs was fined for illegal stock and bond market short selling by the Turkish government, logic would argue further malfeasance potentially could have been avoided by the DOJ’s 1Malaysia Development Berhad investigation. - On April 15, 2021 CNBC reported that Goldman Sachs (note, the previous section’s milestones of April 02, 2021 and April 20, 2021) crucially removed its bias toward Turkey tightening interest rates. Goldman issued guidance highlighting the fact that the bank thought that, “…the removal of the tightening bias against rising inflation expectations suggests that the TCMB (Turkish Central Bank) now has a more dovish reaction function.” - On August 14, 2021 the CyprusMail reported serious concern among economists about data reporting from the Turkish Statistical Institute. Ahmet Takan, a former official with the office of the Turkish prime minister, acted as a whistle blower, warning that Turkey potentially was manipulating inflation data. - On September 1, 2021 Reuters reported that Goldman Sachs hiked Turkish growth forecasts. Goldman economists issued guidance stating, "Overall, the Turkish economy has been able to grow faster than we thought without a deterioration in its external balances, as the pickup in foreign demand has been very supportive." - On November 30, 2021 Reuters reported that Goldman Sachs trimed Turkey’s 2022 growth forecast. Goldman Sachs' Murat Unur stated, "We think that the GDP figures released today tell us little about the pace of economic activity going forward as the recent sell-off in the Lira is likely to impact economic activity significantly" Mr. Marzulli, the DOJ’s Deferred Prosecution Agreement with Goldman Sachs was signed on October 21, 2021. The timeline of events above do not coincide with terms and conditions of the Deferred Agreement mandated by the United States of America. Furthermore, as an international graduate scholars of the world’s only military divided capital on the planet, xNY.io - Bank.org should be protected from any association of crimes against peace, related to the planning, preparation, initiation, waging or participation in a common plan or conspiracy related to a war of aggression, which can only apply in relation to international armed conflict. War Crimes Against Humanity Mr. Marzulli, xNY.io - Bank.org is concerned that potential breaches to the Deferred Agreement are impacting our global enterprise. Crimes against humanity can be committed in peacetime as well as during an armed conflict. Even a single act could fall under this exclusion ground provided it forms part of a widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population and the act is committed by any person (including a civilian) who had knowledge of the attack and the link of the act to the attack. 1. We are looking to learn more about the DOJ’s approach to assessing any potential breaches to the Deferred Agreement’s mandates as we determine New York State’s role in cross-border bank regulation and corresponding innovation beyond war crimes against humanity. 2. In order to establish whether a war crime or a crime against humanity has been committed, the case officer should consult the relevant international instruments and case law. 3. Crimes against humanity are fundamentally inhumane acts, committed as part of a systematic or widespread attack. Inhumane acts, which could reach this threshold when committed pursuant to or in furtherance of a State or organizational policy (potentially, New York State bank regulation). 4. Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender, or other grounds that are universally recognised as impermissible under international law. 5. Furthermore, we have made 28 highlights to the Deferred Agreement providing supporting reference to Memo #4’s overarching premise. xNY.io - Bank.org submits Memo #4 for DOJ consideration of other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health. Some crimes against humanity would require an additional specific intent, such as Goldman Sachs willfully disrespecting New York State and/or overall peace and security of the United States of America. Memo #1, Memo #2, Memo #3 and Memo #4 outline instances that correspond with the associated definitions of the potential war crimes abroad and jeopardize the future of bank innovation from New York, at great sacrifice to the Homeland. We hope to learn the DOJ’s approach to comment on Memo #4’s subject matter or, without delay refer these concerns to the International Criminal Court and/or International Court of Justice for comment. Respectfully yours with anticipation, Gunnar Larson - xNY.io <http://www.xny.io> | Bank.org <http://bank.org>MSc <https://www.unic.ac.cy/blockchain/msc-digital-currency/?utm_source=Google&u…> - Digital Currency MBA <https://www.unic.ac.cy/business-administration-entrepreneurship-and-innovat…> - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip) G(a)xNY.io +1-646-454-9107

1 83

The DOJ’s Incestuous Relationship with Jamie Dimon Is Captured in a Graphic from an Historic Lawsuit
by Gunnar Larson 19 Jan '24

19 Jan '24

First Republic changed my life. Gunnar -- https://wallstreetonparade.com/2024/01/the-dojs-incestuous-relationship-wit… By Pam Martens and Russ Martens: January 18, 2024 ~ On February 10, 2014, the non-profit watchdog, Better Markets, took a bold and historic action. It filed a federal lawsuit against the highest law enforcement agency and officer in the United States – the U.S. Department of Justice and the man who sat at its helm, Attorney General Eric Holder. The lawsuit challenged a $13 billion out-of-court settlement that had been agreed to by the Justice Department and the Wall Street mega bank, JPMorgan Chase, over its sale of toxic mortgages. Better Markets wrote on its website that this was at the time “The largest settlement in U.S. history from a single entity by more than 300%” and that it “granted JP Morgan blanket civil immunity for years of alleged, but undisclosed, pervasive, egregious and knowing fraudulent and illegal conduct that contributed to the 2008 financial crash and the worst economy since the Great Depression.” Among the many eyebrow-raising allegations in the Better Markets’ press release, these three stood out: “The Attorney General and other senior DOJ political appointees negotiated directly and entirely in secret with the CEO of JP Morgan Chase [Jamie Dimon], someone who was considered a possible Treasury Secretary just a few years ago. “The cellphone of DOJ’s third highest ranking official rang with the ‘familiar’ phone number of JP Morgan Chase’s CEO [Jamie Dimon], who called to offer billions of dollars to stop DOJ from holding a press conference and filing a lawsuit in just a few hours. The call worked, and the press conference and lawsuit were both called off. “DOJ gave complete civil immunity to JP Morgan Chase for defrauding thousands in exchange for $13 billion, via a contract that was negotiated and finalized in secret without any review or approval by a federal court.” Attorneys for the Justice Department asked the federal court to dismiss the Better Markets lawsuit on the basis that Better Markets lacked standing to file the lawsuit. The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia did just that in a longwinded decision that effectively stripped Americans of their ability to fight back against the increasingly corrupt nexus between Washington and Wall Street. We reached out this week to Better Markets’ President and CEO, Dennis Kelleher, to explain how federal courts can get away with this type of cronyism. He responded as follows: “Unfortunately, the U.S. legal system is an unlevel playing field tilted in favor of Wall Street’s banks/Corporate America and against Main Street Americans/the public interest. That’s because judges require anyone bringing a lawsuit to show ‘standing’ to file a case, which almost always depends on a plaintiff showing quantifiable, concrete, and specific if not unique harm. Because banks/Corporate America can always show or make up some dollar amount of injury from a government action or rule, they virtually always have standing to sue. But Main Street Americans/the public interest almost always cannot because public harm usually is not quantifiable, concrete, specific or unique to a particular plaintiff. “For example, even if it was objectively true that the DOJ/Eric Holder sold out to JPMorganChase/Jamie Dimon, Better Markets’ case would have been thrown out because the harm from that sell out would be to everyone in the country and not a quantifiable, concrete, specific, or unique harm to Better Markets. The same is true if an agency like the CFTC or SEC knowingly enacted a rule that unlawfully favored the financial industry. Public interest groups or just ordinary citizens would likely get thrown out of court if they sued unless there was some unique harm inflicted. Put differently, while there are some exceptions, as long as the harm is to the broad public interest you basically cannot sue to protect the public interest.” If this sounds like the Kafkaesque court logic of a vast wealth transfer conspiracy, you’re thinking along the right lines. Better Markets' Graphic from Press Conference on February 10, 2014 Announcing Lawsuit Against the DOJ Better Markets’ Graphic from Press Conference Announcing Lawsuit Against the DOJ Take a closer look at the graphic that Better Markets presented at its press conference announcing the lawsuit. What it effectively shows is a money laundering operation where a recidivist bank pays $13 billion to a federal agency in the executive branch of government; bypasses the judicial branch of government; and walks away with immunity and no questions asked. If that feels more like a banana republic form of justice than that of a thriving democracy, welcome to the new world of kleptocracy in America. Nine months after Better Markets had filed its lawsuit, its worst suspicions about the secret backroom deal materialized in the pages of Rolling Stone under the byline of Matt Taibbi. The Justice Department had silenced the perfect eyewitness, Alayne Fleischmann, a former attorney at JPMorgan Chase who had reported the wrongdoing to her superiors. What Fleischmann described to Taibbi was “massive criminal securities fraud” within the bank. Taibbi describes what happened to Fleishmann as follows: “Six years after the crisis that cratered the global economy, it’s not exactly news that the country’s biggest banks stole on a grand scale. That’s why the more important part of Fleischmann’s story is in the pains Chase and the Justice Department took to silence her.” The Justice Department announced its $13 billion civil settlement with JPMorgan Chase on November 19, 2013. At the time, it clearly knew that it would be bringing stunning criminal charges against the same bank just 49 days later. On January 7, 2014, the Justice Department shocked the country with the announcement that the largest federally-insured bank in the U.S., JPMorgan Chase, had played a key role in the largest Ponzi scheme in history – that of Bernie Madoff. And because the bank hid its suspicions from U.S. law enforcement that a Ponzi scheme was occurring and failed to file the legally-mandated Suspicious Activity Reports, the Justice Department charged the bank with two criminal felony counts. But instead of prosecuting the case in a federal court, where the disgusting details would play out in newspaper headlines for months, the Justice Department allowed the bank to admit to the charges and walk away with a hefty fine and a two-year deferred prosecution agreement; meaning that if the bank did not violate its two-year probation, it would never be prosecuted for these crimes. Since 2014, this kind of backroom deal between JPMorgan Chase and the Justice Department has become enshrined as the new standard for crony justice between Wall Street and Washington. JPMorgan Chase has racked up five felony counts, received three deferred prosecution agreements and two non-prosecution agreements. (See the highlights of its breathtaking rap sheet here.) And yet, there is zero indication that JPMorgan Chase’s appetite for crime as a business model has been satisfied. The Attorney General of the U.S. Virgin Islands last year brought credible evidence into federal court in Manhattan that JPMorgan Chase “actively participated” in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking of minors by ignoring a decade of his money laundering inside the bank – the very money laundering conduct that resulted in the bank admitting to two felony counts in 2014 in the Madoff case. In both matters, the bank failed to file the legally mandated Suspicious Activity Reports with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) despite internal communications showing it was well aware that the financial transactions were highly suspicious. Despite the Justice Department and FBI sitting on reams of evidence in the Jeffrey Epstein/JPMorgan case since 2008, the DOJ has brought no criminal charges against the bank related to Epstein. Notwithstanding this unprecedented crime wave at JPMorgan Chase, and the ability of Jamie Dimon to not only remain at the helm of the biggest bank in the U.S. but to become a billionaire from the stock options lavished on him by his Board, federal regulators again proved themselves to be the lapdogs that millions of Americans suspect them to be when they allowed JPMorgan Chase to get $200 billion bigger last year. George Washington University Law Professor, Art Wilmarth, author of Taming the Megabanks: Why We Need a New Glass-Steagall Act, explained during the Better Markets conference in September of last year exactly what transpired in the spring of 2023 when regulators handed JPMorgan Chase the collapsed bank, First Republic: “…When First Republic failed, regulators did not invoke the systemic risk exception. That was a clear and rather shocking error in my opinion. They accepted JPMorgan’s bid to buy most of the assets and assume all of the deposits of First Republic. “By the way, JPMorgan recorded a profit of almost $3 billion on that transaction. The Deposit Insurance Fund has recognized a loss of at least $13 billion and it may be larger on that transaction. That’s a hard result to justify and I don’t think the FDIC has attempted to justify it and I don’t think they can… “So what they did was to impose a loss of $13 billion on the Deposit Insurance Fund, which must be reimbursed by all the banks, not just the big ones, not even the banks larger than $5 billion – all the banks – meanwhile handing JPMorgan a $3 billion profit; increasing JPMorgan’s size by more than $200 billion and allowing JPMorgan to grow to a size of more than $4 trillion. By the way, also waiving any anti-trust review because First Republic Bank was a failed bank, so there was no anti-trust review.” If this is not the kind of “democracy” that you want to leave to your children and grandchildren, pick up the phone today and call your U.S. Senators’ office and demand the appointment of a Special Counsel to investigate these backroom deals between the Justice Department and JPMorgan Chase.

1 1

[old] NewAE Technology Inc. is the embedded security arsonist.
by Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many 19 Jan '24

19 Jan '24

This content just looks fun. It came up briefly when I was looking into imaging my mediatek device. https://github.com/newaetech https://www.newae.com https://rtfm.newae.com ChipWhisperer ChipWhisperer is an open source toolchain that makes learning about side-channel attacks easy and affordable. It also serves as a platform for performing side-channel research in a well documented, cost-effective, and repeatable way. ChipWhisperer is mostly focused on power analysis attacks[1] and voltage and clock glitching, which disrupt a device’s power supply or clock signal to cause unintended behaviour (such as skipping a password check). 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_analysis Capture¶ <https://rtfm.newae.com/#capture> Capture contains information about the "capture" side of the ChipWhisperer hardware. These devices, such as the ChipWhisperer-Lite and ChipWhisperer-Pro, are the part of the hardware actually performing the side-channel attacks. For example, they can measure power consumption, allowing you to recover an encryption key, or insert voltage glitches to cause mayhem on an embedded device. Not sure about the differences between capture hardware? We've got a capture hardware comparison <https://rtfm.newae.com/Capture/>. Targets¶ <https://rtfm.newae.com/#targets> Targets contains information about the "target" side of the ChipWhisperer hardware, which are the devices that you're trying to research attacks on. These boards make hardware setup much easier compared to boards not designed for side channel research, such as development boards. Like with the capture hardware, we've also got a target comparison page <https://rtfm.newae.com/Targets/> ------------------------------ ChipSHOUTER¶ <https://rtfm.newae.com/#chipshouter> ChipSHOUTER is a platform for researching electromagnetic fault injection, which uses intense electromagnetic fields to disrupt a target's operation, providing a less invasive way to perform glitch attacks compared to the voltage and clock glitching of the ChipWhisperer. This directory has documentation for both the ChipSHOUTER, as well as associated targets designed specifically for exploring electromagnetic fault injection. ------------------------------ Tools¶ <https://rtfm.newae.com/#tools> This directory contains information on tools that offer new directions for research and help you extend your attacks to different platforms. For example, the PhyWhisperer is a device that allows you sniff and trigger based on USB data. Other examples include an H-Field probe for doing non-invasive power analysis and analog filters for improving the data that you collect from power analysis. ------------------------------ Starter Kits¶ <https://rtfm.newae.com/#starter-kits> NewAE sells much of its hardware bundled together in different kits. This directory contains information on these bundles. If you are interested in how to get started in Side-Channel Power Analysis & Fault Injection, check out some of the "Starter Kits" that include required hardware. Again, we've got a comparison page <https://rtfm.newae.com/Starter%20Kits/> for the different starter kits.

1 0

Bitcoin Drops to Lowest Level Since Approval of ETFs
by Gunnar Larson 18 Jan '24

18 Jan '24

Cryptocurrency has dropped about 10% following ETF sign-off Bitcoin Drops to Lowest Level Since Approval of ETFs https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-01-18/bitcoin-drops-to-lowest-… Bitcoin fell to the lowest price level since the US approved nearly a dozen exchange-traded funds that hold the cryptocurrency last week.

1 0

A Former NSA Chief Caught SPAC Fever, and Investors Got Burned
by Gunnar Larson 18 Jan '24

18 Jan '24

A Former NSA Chief Caught SPAC Fever, and Investors Got Burned https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-01-18/former-nsa-chief-keith-a… During his time with the US Army, General Keith Alexander ran top-secret spy operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, led the US’s efforts to develop offensive cyber capacity and, as director of the National Security Agency, endured criticism over the expansion of mass surveillance. But the cyber spymaster is quick to admit that he suffered a costly intelligence failure in unfamiliar territory: Wall Street.

1 0

The Bitcoin Hype Is Back and About Just as Hollow as Before
by Gunnar Larson 18 Jan '24

18 Jan '24

The Bitcoin Hype Is Back and About Just as Hollow as Before https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-01-18/bitcoin-price-surge-mask… Bitcoin mania seemed pretty much cooked last fall. Sam Bankman-Fried, the former chief executive officer of crypto exchange FTX, was convicted in November of orchestrating a massive fraud, and a few weeks later, Changpeng Zhao, co-founder of FTX rival Binance, pleaded guilty to federal money laundering charges and stepped down as CEO. With two of the wealthiest and most admired figures in the industry likely on their way to prison for crimes related to the basic operation of their respective company, the notion that any sane person would still choose the crypto roller coaster over the conventional financial system seemed close to unimaginable.

1 0

BREAKING: Robinhood To Pay $7.5M To Exit Mass. Regulator Probe
by Gunnar Larson 18 Jan '24

18 Jan '24

BREAKING: Robinhood To Pay $7.5M To Exit Mass. Regulator Probe By Chris Villani Robinhood Financial LLC has agreed to pay $7.5 million and make sweeping changes to the "gamification" of its platform under a deal announced Thursday by Massachusetts securities regulators, ending a three-year-old case that saw the online trader unsuccessfully plead its case to the state's top appellate court. 1 document attached | Read full article » | Save to favorites »

1 0

Mayors Call On Congress To Renew FCC Broadband Subsidy
by Gunnar Larson 18 Jan '24

18 Jan '24

Mayors Call On Congress To Renew FCC Broadband Subsidy <https://www.law360.com/technology/articles/1786729?nl_pk=2bd720dd-746c-4744…> By Christopher Cole Dozens of mayors are pressing lawmakers to replenish the Federal Communications Commission's Affordable Connectivity Program, which the agency has begun winding down as funds run low. Letter attached | Read full article » <https://www.law360.com/technology/articles/1786729?nl_pk=2bd720dd-746c-4744…> | Save to favorites » <https://www.law360.com/technology/articles/1786729?nl_pk=2bd720dd-746c-4744…>

1 0

Trump Seeks 'Collusion' Evidence In Classified Docs Case
by Gunnar Larson 18 Jan '24

18 Jan '24

Trump Seeks 'Collusion' Evidence In Classified Docs Case <https://www.law360.com/fintech/articles/1786844?nl_pk=d2b3e7ef-ab62-4a62-80…> By Jack Karp Special counsel Jack Smith should be forced to hand over what Donald Trump insists is "evidence of collusion" by the Biden administration, the DOJ, intelligence agencies and even a Georgia district attorney's office involved in the prosecution of the former president over allegations that he swiped classified documents, Trump told a Florida federal judge Tuesday. Motion attached | Read full article » <https://www.law360.com/fintech/articles/1786844?nl_pk=d2b3e7ef-ab62-4a62-80…> | Save to favorites » <https://www.law360.com/fintech/articles/1786844?nl_pk=d2b3e7ef-ab62-4a62-80…>

1 0

Civil Rights Groups Urge Senate To Prioritize Judicial Noms
by Gunnar Larson 18 Jan '24

18 Jan '24

Civil Rights Groups Urge Senate To Prioritize Judicial Noms <https://www.law360.com/fintech/articles/1786153?nl_pk=d2b3e7ef-ab62-4a62-80…> By Courtney Buble More than 100 civil and human rights groups are calling on the U.S. Senate to continue prioritizing the confirmation of judicial nominees, especially those with a commitment to civil and human rights. Letter attached | Read full article » <https://www.law360.com/fintech/articles/1786153?nl_pk=d2b3e7ef-ab62-4a62-80…> | Save to favorites » <https://www.law360.com/fintech/articles/1786153?nl_pk=d2b3e7ef-ab62-4a62-80…>

1 0