November 2022 - cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

[ot][spam] remailer notes
by Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many 22 Nov '22

22 Nov '22

I’m reading some of http://www.faqs.org/faqs/privacy/anon-server/faq/use/ . At the moment I’ve read through part3 (but ended up taking notes through the end). I’ve also read a couple list posts. - the faq is considered out of date by many years - there are paid remailer networks people use - a lot of activity regarding windows machines - running a remailer takes a little upkeep - send test messages to alt.test or misc.tes - cypherpunk or type I remailers accept commands and forward messages - they can be crafted in a text editor [1] - commands also accepted in subject line: Subject: remailer-key Subject: remailer-conf Subject: remailer-help Subject: remailer-stats - mixmaster or type II remailers perform onion routing and obfuscation - mixmaster remailers are used with client software rather than manually part 4: - the security of a remailer node relies on its secure administration; hence encrypted hops - the remailer people experienced traffic analysis attacks - at the time of writing of the faq, four newer projects were listed: WOF <http://www.bigfoot.com/~potatoware/wof/>, RadioClash <http://piratech.net/radioclash/>, Publius <http://www.cs.nyu.edu/~waldman/publius/>, Freenet <http://freenet.sourceforge.net/> - “middleman” remailers always add an additional hop if one is not provided - using multiple hops is called “chaining” - for the message to be hidden from basic node and network operators, it must be both encrypted and chained - manual chaining for old type I remailers instructions pasted at [2] - mail2news gateways forward emails to newsgroups nonanonymously - remailers can do this with command: Anon-Post-To: misc.test - mail2news gateways respond to subject line commands: “help” “group” “list RE” where RE is a regexp - mail2news group list replies may leave out many groups actually supported - remailers can barf when too many email headers accumulate - you can abuse open smtp relays to forward mail by checking abuse watch sites, faq explains this (people were probably asking about it, crackers hide this way) part 5 explains remailers’ stats pages part 6: - learn pgp - major remailer clients included quicksilver (windows) and mixmaster (cross-platform) - i searched the list. a newer remailer is yamn (golang): https://sec3.net/yamnhelp/ https://github.com/crooks/yamn crook is his last name. also omnimix on windows: https://www.danner-net.de/om.htm . there’s a newer mixmaster (last update 2021) too: https://github.com/merkinmuffley/mixmaster4096 part 7 - nym servers let you send with a name and reply-to address by registering with them - nym servers don’t need to know who you are. - nym commands must begin with “Config:” - you can configure a nym server to send replies to alt.anonymous.messages - the replies encrypt information to your private key for identification [3] - remember to rotate all keys regularly - usage problems are usually from broken material: nonresponding remailers, nonworking reply blocks. verify each part of config. part 8 - delay time can be set with Latent-Time: +0:00 - sometimes it can take days for a message to go through, but usually this is due to understandable/comprehensible network details - messages can also be dropped for a number of reasons [4] 1: ============ :: Anon-To: news.reporter(a)nbc.com Latent-Time: +0:00 ## Subject: My Company Dumps Toxic Waste I'm writing this anonymously because I don't want to lose my job. My company has, for the past three years... ============ The above message is cut and paste into PGP and encrypted with the chosen remailer's key, say gretchen(a)neuropa.net ============ -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: PGP 2.6x hQCMA8asoPEC0e2BAQP9GqR2aXNOstRq8eJW2QVubioR0gO7Ue0AOL/rFdnxXknC YPpe2X2TKlcvd961+lhe9w2Y8vo3JcBYYBifTJRwmMjnXLagCU4Mhh0VZtk/QXMZ /FLeJWi67qsb45a2mNw0/Q8eXHKfOQyHcmEQ7cg/bq4Xz6LusfxBHF8zsojVOgal 8RVRtr9drjBlOzJvWxaq7LrKidME6q0tM7pRiLN5dvVBon2NKlmpJI6vAFjyi8ma f5Bg6Zor+PMxcm3EmuWbjLEiOu5USrTgU4OiaC7PHF9INxwXuKmdNz/JprgOc0c6 6s6RvbOo6rsvlwqPKw== =ICz/ -----END PGP MESSAGE----- ============= Finally, the user has to append a directive to the top of the encrypted message, making it look like this: ============ :: Encrypted: PGP -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: PGP 2.6x hQCMA8asoPEC0e2BAQP9GqR2aXNOstRq8eJW2QVubioR0gO7Ue0AOL/rFdnxXknC YPpe2X2TKlcvd961+lhe9w2Y8vo3JcBYYBifTJRwmMjnXLagCU4Mhh0VZtk/QXMZ /FLeJWi67qsb45a2mNw0/Q8eXHKfOQyHcmEQ7cg/bq4Xz6LusfxBHF8zsojVOgal 8RVRtr9drjBlOzJvWxaq7LrKidME6q0tM7pRiLN5dvVBon2NKlmpJI6vAFjyi8ma f5Bg6Zor+PMxcm3EmuWbjLEiOu5USrTgU4OiaC7PHF9INxwXuKmdNz/JprgOc0c6 6s6RvbOo6rsvlwqPKw== =ICz/ -----END PGP MESSAGE----- ============ The user then mails the above encrypted message (double colons and all) NOT to the intended recipient but instead to the remailer's address: <gretchen(a)neuropa.net>. This arrives at the remailer where it is eventually processed, decrypted and mailed to <news.reporter(a)nbc.com> appearing to have come from "Anonymous" <nobody(a)neuropa.net>. 2: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Anonymous <remailer(a)remailer.xganon.com> wrote: [SNIP] >Now I want to use a chain of remailers? How do I do this? I'm >guessing I should somehow encrypt the message using all the keys of >the remailers in the chain? And if I send the message to the first >remailer in the chain, how do I let that remailer know to send it to >the next one? If someone could either tell me how to do this, or >direct me toward an information source explaining this, I'd >appreciate it. Chaining messages is achieved by repeating the encryption steps. Taken as an example, chaining through two remailers thus, You -> A -> B -> Recipient You start off with your message and prefix with :: Anon-To: <recipient@somewhere> ## Subject: <some text> <MESSAGE> You then encrypt this with the key of the remailer B, and prefix it with :: Anon-To: <Remailer-B@somewhere> :: Encrypted: PGP <PGP MESSAGE> You take this and encrypt it with the key of remailer A, and prefix with :: Encrypted: PGP and now send it to remailer A. What happens then is that remailer A takes the message, decodes it, and sends it to remailer B. Remailer B decodes it and sends it to the recipient. Doc. - -- The bigger the humbug, the better people will like it. ~ Phineas Taylor Barnum. http://vmsbox.cjb.net -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQEVAwUBO3By8sriC3SGiziTAQH4Cwf+JSwjLQcPtVbNAOKB28NBdA+yLLWYflmB bjpH3nzDyV0TUEEiRH7gdancM8CuMk4n+5D+hWCHIyFoaR93/BuGdft9s8xuPi8M nzSzPO4pFht8NTzhkkrn9iUcJWgh+fFNfBvWtjDCLs6qdxoQwTUI9N0ioceAlK1S vk78pYdZ9srxCEr5sCyuAR56wRq0Sa81SDePOcYz48FrRR51Zdoe/cu3Hu4AYeY5 wpC5J59U0BIVb9xnt9zBR7I3aQZArFffZ2G6vdEHDnVulY5hpXjenEgUCUjFH+da bCD6dCOVtPxYvFbo9mmMY6spiDwfeaOXzniFdFvqdrbADycW2s7qiw== =3VgO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 3: According to the Reliable User's Manual, the "random" strings of numbers and letters which appear in the "Subject:" line are encrypted MD5 hashes of the final "Subject:" line. That is, the remailer client calculates an MD5 hash from the "Subject:" line(which might be, e.g., "ATTN: Dave") in the final or hash headers (below the "##"). This MD5 hash that results from this calculation is likely to be unique to that particular "Subject:" line. The remailer client then encrypts the MD5 hash using conventional (symmetric) encryption, specifically IDEA. The encryption and decryption key is the passphrase given for the "Encrypt-Subject:" directive. 4: Subject: [FAQ 8.2] Why didn't my email/post make it through? + Your message may have just been lost in the network for any number of reasons. It does happen. The system isn't 100% reliable. + You are using broken chains or stale remailer keys. + Your source address or domain is being blocked by the first remailer in your chain. + Your destination address, domain, or newsgroup is being blocked by the last remailer in your chain. + The Usenet group you are posting to is not available on the news server or gateway being used by the last remailer in your chain. + You are trying to crosspost to too many newsgroups and the final remailer in your chain discarded the message. Send a blank email to the remailer with 'remailer-conf' as the subject to determine how many newsgroups the remailer allows you to cross-post to. Spammers abuse the cross posting option so operators are cutting back to 3 or 4 cross posts to deter the spammers. + You have too many addresses in the To, Cc, or Bcc headers and the final remailer in your chain discarded the message. + You attempted to send an anonymous message to a nym that is configured to either reject Bcc messages (directive +nobcc) or not accept any mail at all. + Your e-mail recipient is filtering out messages from anonymous remailers. + You are simply having a bad day. 'Better luck tomorrow! RProcess, the author of JBN2 and the Reliable Remailer, has systematically examined why so many anon messages seem to disappear. His conclusions [http://www.bigfoot.com/~potatoware/PSKB-035.html] are quite provocative.

1 0

Re: [notes][spam] Wikileaks Not Serving Crucial Pages
by Karl Semich 22 Nov '22

22 Nov '22

OUR COMMUNICATIONS AND THINGS ARE BEING MALICIOUSLY ALTERED. On 11/21/22, Douglas Lucas <dal(a)riseup.net> wrote: > You found some content on archive.org. But I don't care. > > Years ago the /Daily Dot/ report said the journalist had obtained an > independent copy of the Syria Files through a lawsuit. By comparing that > copy with what has been on the WikiLeaks website, Daily Dot determined > that _Wikileaks had removed data from the Syria Files dataset_ which was > to the benefit of Russia and Syria. No, they didn't trip over a cable. I > don't need your "Internet for Dummies" lectures about how there are VPNs > and how sometimes website vistors email website admins to let them know > a file is missing. If you serach my tweets, you'll find I already years > ago notified WikiLeaks that some of their CRS reports were down and they > said thanks and restored them. That's not the same as hiding a Syria > File to benefit Assad which Wikileaks Party was meeting with, and you > know it. > > Wikileaks/Assadgne discredited themselves long ago by: > > * Spreading pizzagate when they know of #OpDeathEaters because I and > other told them multiple times across years > > * Not helping their sources/defendants when I myself and others > contacted them begging them to do more multiple times across years > > * Chummy with fascists, the list goes on > > * Mocking French civilians killed by terrorists because the manosphere > hates the .EU it’s great douglas is calling out the corruption of wikileaks after they were targeted, and has personal experience backing this, talking about this can help the world. > > I desubscribed from the cypherpunks list, and I'm blocking you as well. > You'll always have Assadgne to worship, and as he deletes leaks to this doesn’t make sense to me, although really cpunks and me do seem to have some of the same issue wikileaks has, douglas doesnt deserve to be upset this much or ignored in these ways > protect far right, you can run interference for him by posting to > cypherpunks about how see, it's complicated, the Internet has different > IP addresses and gateways and for that reason Assadnge can delete > anything he wants, whenever he wants, for as long as he wants, and you > will call him King Transparency. i did not hold the issue with enough seriousness > > Why I ever wasted time on a list screaming "jewnazi" and "murder people" > every day, is beyond me. we used to block the people who said these things > > Again, read that DAily Dot report and tell yourself: "I Karl deeply > admire Julian Assange for deleting leaks and refusing to help his > sources and probably somebody just tripped over a cable or something the > internet is complicated me and my friends screaming /jewnazi/ are here > to help!" wikileaks is run by dictatorial spy agencies now, which is abhorrent and needs further calling out. they also did good and important work. you are sharing some really important information here. it’s hard to hold it when we are in conflict. i learn slowly. i'm sorry, and be well.

2 1

[ot] Fwd: 13 Nov 2022 - stats
by k 22 Nov '22

22 Nov '22

-

2 1

ping - Karl
by Stefan Claas 22 Nov '22

22 Nov '22

Now that's what I call a *certificate*, for modern public key cryptography and not what some InfoSec people call "certificate", when speaking about OpenPGP. https://github.com/sac001/age-ID Best of all you can't spam the included email address! For sure, Punk will hate it! *In memories of Hal Finney, Ulf Möller and Len Sassamann.* Best regards Stefan

5 41

German authorities search BNY Mellon bank in cum-ex probe
by Gunnar Larson 22 Nov '22

22 Nov '22

https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/german-authorities-search-bny-mell…

1 0

How to Hide MetaData in Secure Group Messaging
by Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many 22 Nov '22

22 Nov '22

I thought I’d post something that wasn’t spam and went off to look for recent papers. Maybe I’ll do this again or something. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3548606.3560679 https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3548606.3560679 How to Hide MetaData in MLS-Like Secure Group Messaging: Simple, Modular, and Post-Quantum Secure group messaging (SGM) protocols allow large groups of users to communicate in a secure and asynchronous manner. In recent years, continuous group key agreements (CGKAs) have provided a powerful abstraction to reason on the security properties we expect from SGM protocols. While robust techniques have been developed to protect the contents of conversations in this context, it is in general more challenging to protect metadata (e.g. the identity and social relationships of group members), since their knowledge is often needed by the server in order to ensure the proper function of the SGM protocol. In this work, we provide a simple and generic wrapper protocol that upgrades non-metadata-hiding CGKAs into metadata-hiding CGKAs. Our key insight is to leverage the existence of a unique continuously evolving group secret key shared among the group members. We use this key to perform a group membership authentication protocol that convinces the server in an anonymous manner that a user is a legitimate group member. Our technique only uses a standard signature scheme, and thus, the wrapper protocol can be instantiated from a wide range of assumptions, including post-quantum ones. It is also very efficient, as it increases the bandwidth cost of the underlying CGKA operations by at most a factor of two. To formally prove the security of our protocol, we use the universal composability (UC) framework and model a new ideal functionality ℱmhCGKA capturing the correctness and security guarantee of metadata-hiding CGKA. To capture the above intuition of a "wrapper'' protocol, we also define a restricted ideal functionality ℱctxt CGKA, which roughly captures a non-metadata-hiding CGKA. We then show that our wrapper protocol UC-realizes ℱmhCGKA in the ℱctxtCGKA -hybrid model, which in particular formalizes the intuition that any non-metadata-hiding CGKA can be modularly bootstrapped into metadata-hiding CGKA.

2 2

U.S. Justice Department Steps into the FTX Bankruptcy Case in Delaware
by Gunnar Larson 22 Nov '22

22 Nov '22

https://wallstreetonparade.com/2022/11/u-s-justice-department-steps-into-th… Two attorneys from the Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. have filed an appearance with the Bankruptcy Court in Delaware that is hearing the bankruptcy case filed by the disgraced crypto exchange, FTX, and its related hedge fund, Alameda Research. Both are majority-owned by the scandalized former crypto kingpin Sam Bankman-Fried. More than 100 other global tentacles of FTX are included in the bankruptcy case. The DOJ attorneys that made the notices of appearance are Seth Shapiro and Stanton McManus. The notice of appearance for both attorneys references two noteworthy statutes, 28 U.S.C. § 516 and 518, among others: 28 U.S.C. § 516 reads as follows: “Except as otherwise authorized by law, the conduct of litigation in which the United States, an agency, or officer thereof is a party, or is interested, and *securing evidence therefor, is reserved to officers of the Department of Justice, under the direction of the Attorney General*.” (Italics added.) 28 U.S.C. § 518, reads in part: “When the Attorney General considers it in the interests of the United States, *he may personally conduct and argue any case in a court of the United States in which the United States is interested*, or he may direct the Solicitor General or any officer of the Department of Justice to do so.” (Italics added.) The notices from the Department of Justice were filed yesterday. Today, the following item has been added to the court docket on behalf of FTX: “[SEALED] Motion to Authorize (Motion for Entry of Interim and Final Orders (A) Authorizing the Debtors, *in their Sole Discretion*, to Provide *Indemnification and Exculpation to Certain Individuals*, (B) Authorizing Certain Actions Pursuant to Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code, and (C) Granting Certain Related Relief) Filed by FTX Trading Ltd.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A # 2 Exhibit B) (Landis, Adam) (Entered: 11/22/2022)” (Italics added.) The ”debtors” are FTX and its related companies that have filed bankruptcy. Its legal standing to, in its “sole discretion,” indemnify and exculpate anyone for potential crimes is preposterous. And to place the details of this absurd request under seal is a further outrage to the sensibilities of all Americans. Reuters has reported <https://www.reuters.com/markets/currencies/exclusive-least-1-billion-client…> that Bankman-Fried moved as much as $10 billion of FTX customers’ money to his separate hedge fund, Alameda Research, through a “backdoor” in its software. Alameda is reported to have lost much of the money on bad investments and efforts to prop up its FTX token (FTT), while $1 billion to $2 billion has just “disappeared,” according to Reuters. The Financial Times reported that FTX held just $900 million “in easily sellable assets” against $9 billion “of liabilities the day before it collapsed into bankruptcy.” The major law firm overseeing the FTX bankruptcy proceedings is Sullivan & Cromwell, which has a host of conflicts because of past legal work it did for FTX <https://wallstreetonparade.com/2022/11/big-law-firm-sullivan-cromwell-did-s…> and related companies. It is also not clear who had the authority to hire Sullivan & Cromwell for the FTX bankruptcy case or who had the authority to hire the new FTX CEO, John Ray III. The pleadings in the case thus far fail to indicate who it was that hired Sullivan & Cromwell or Ray. Yesterday,* Wall Street On Parade* sent an email to Robert Giuffra and Scott Miller, Co-Chairs of Sullivan & Cromwell, and to Andy Dietderich – one of the Sullivan & Cromwell lawyers who is involved in the bankruptcy case as well as the attorney who represented FTX and Alameda in their curious efforts to buy the assets of the bankrupt crypto firm, Voyager Digital, a company from whom Alameda had taken hundreds of millions of dollars in loans <https://www.cnbc.com/2022/08/09/sam-bankman-frieds-alameda-voyager-digital-…>. We wrote as follows to Sullivan & Cromwell: “We’re planning an article for early next week on the FTX/Alameda situation and we’re wondering how Sullivan & Cromwell was appointed to handle the bankruptcy process in the Delaware court. “Our question stems from the fact that the new FTX CEO reports that the Board of Directors of FTX didn’t meet — so it was a non-functioning Board that wouldn’t appear to have the legitimacy to appoint a law firm to handle the bankruptcy. “The CEO until November 11, Sam Bankman-Fried, has been characterized in court filings by the new FTX CEO, John Ray III, as being incompetent at best and a fraudster at worst. So it doesn’t appear that Bankman-Fried had legitimacy to appoint Sullivan & Cromwell. “So, you can see our puzzlement as to whom had the authority and legitimacy to appoint Sullivan & Cromwell. “Our deadline is today at 10 p.m. ET.” We received no response from anyone at Sullivan & Cromwell. We scoured the filings in the FTX bankruptcy case to see if there was an inkling of how a law firm that was attempting to help FTX buy up other firms while FTX was reportedly looting customer accounts got hired for the bankruptcy court case. We found the following interesting tidbits from the new CEO, John Ray: “I have over 40 years of legal and restructuring experience…Never in my career have I seen such a complete failure of corporate controls and such a complete absence of trustworthy financial information as occurred here. >From compromised systems integrity and faulty regulatory oversight abroad, to the concentration of control in the hands of a very small group of inexperienced, unsophisticated and potentially compromised individuals, this situation is unprecedented.” Can a group of inexperienced and potentially compromised individuals hire the successor CEO and the bankruptcy law firm for a global crypto firm being investigated around the world? Ray writes elsewhere: “I, John J. Ray III, hereby declare under penalty of perjury as follows: 1. I am the Chief Executive Officer of the above-captioned debtors and debtors-in-possession (collectively, the ‘Debtors’), having accepted this position in the early morning hours of November 11, 2022. I am administering the interests and affairs of the Debtors from my offices in the United States… “In the days leading up to the Petition Date, certain of the circumstances described in Part III below became known to a broader set of executives of the FTX Group beyond Mr. Bankman-Fried and members of his inner circle. Questions arose about Mr. Bankman-Fried’s leadership and the handling of the Debtors’ complex array of assets and businesses.” And there is this: “As the situation became increasingly dire, Sullivan & Cromwell and Alvarez & Marsal were engaged to provide restructuring advice and services to the Debtors…” Again, no specific names of who hired them. And this: “At the same time, negotiations were being held between certain senior individuals of the FTX Group and Mr. Bankman-Fried concerning the resignation of Mr. Bankman-Fried and the commencement of these Chapter 11 Cases. Mr. Bankman-Fried consulted with numerous lawyers, including lawyers at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, other legal counsel and his father, Professor Joseph Bankman of Stanford Law School. A document effecting a relinquishment of control was prepared and comments from Mr. Bankman-Fried’s team incorporated. At approximately 4:30 a.m. EST on Friday, November 11, 2022, after further consultation with his legal counsel, Mr. Bankman-Fried ultimately agreed to resign, resulting in my appointment as the Debtors’ CEO. I was delegated all corporate powers and authority under applicable law, including the power to appoint independent directors and commence these Chapter 11 Cases on an emergency basis.” Aside from the fact that all night negotiations ending at 4:30 a.m. in the morning are perhaps not the best way to determine the fate of a company and its customers’ missing funds, again Ray makes the claim that he was “delegated all corporate powers and authority under applicable law,” but fails to state the person or persons who delegated this power to him. As for the adequacy of Sam Bankman-Fried’s legal representation, his father may not have been the best choice. Reuters is reporting this morning <https://www.reuters.com/technology/exclusive-bankman-frieds-ftx-parents-bou…> that Sam Bankman-Fried’s parents are attempting to return a deed to FTX for luxury property in the Bahamas that was in their name. As for Paul Weiss, it quickly dumped Sam Bankman-Fried as a client <https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:5LbmN8iwnowJ:https://…> . Ray is clear on the negligence of the FTX Board of Directors, writing: “Many of the companies in the FTX Group, especially those organized in Antigua and the Bahamas, did not have appropriate corporate governance. I understand that many entities, for example, never had board meetings.” Despite the sketchiness of just how Ray became CEO and how Sullivan & Cromwell got to wear so many hats in the FTX debacle, big bucks are flowing to the swarms of new FTX advisors. According to the court filings, Ray will be paid $1300 an hour; the Directors he appointed will be paid $50,000 a month; the new Chief Administrative Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Information Officer will be paid $975 an hour; and Ray’s employer, Owl Hill Advisory LLC, will receive a $200,000 retainer. We’ve yet to locate the hourly rate at which Sullivan & Cromwell will be paid, but we’ll certainly keep an eye out for it. If there was ever a case where the Department of Justice needs to be actively involved, this is it. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Pam Martens <alerts(a)wallstreetonparade.com> Date: Tue, Nov 22, 2022, 10:02 AM Subject: Once Daily Digest Email To: <alerts(a)wallstreetonparade.com> Wall Street On Parade has posted a new item: U.S. Justice Department Steps into the FTX Bankruptcy Case in Delaware https://wallstreetonparade.com/2022/11/u-s-justice-department-steps-into-th… By Pam Martens and Russ Martens: November 22, 2022 ~ Two attorneys from the Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. have filed an appearance with the Bankruptcy Court in Delaware that is hearing the bankruptcy case filed by the disgraced crypto exchange, FTX, and its related hedge fund, Alameda Research. Both are majority-owned by the scandalized former [...] If the hyperlink above is not active, please paste it into your browser and press "Go" to read the full article. You received this e-mail because you asked to be notified when new updates are posted. If you ever wish to stop receiving these emails from us, just email me at pamk741(a)aol.com with the word "Unsubscribe" in the subject line. Best regards, Pam Martens, Editor, Wall Street On Parade

1 0

not seein everyones reply
by ytooR 22 Nov '22

22 Nov '22

Hi Gramp. Can you help me with the above issue. I have tried everything and nothing is working. Thx maybe I just need to sign up different email. Please let me no this hurtful Thanks! Ytoor

2 1

Phil Zimmerman, Jim Bell, and Eric Hughes, oh my
by professor rat 22 Nov '22

22 Nov '22

A non-libertarian, a libertarian and a lapsed libertarian conscripted by dodgy fiat-cuffed shitcoin https://blog.bitfinex.com/media-releases/bitfinex-unveils-freedom-manifesto… Reposts may smell nasty

1 0

Cryptocurrency: Snowden Slams Exchanges Building SpyVeillance
by grarpamp 22 Nov '22

22 Nov '22

https:/moneywreckers.com/coinbase-over-compliance-is-toxic-and-embarrassing-says-edward-snowden/

1 0