November 2019 - cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

Russia breached FBI
by jim bell 14 Jan '20

14 Jan '20

Exclusive: Russia breached top-secret FBI communications system https://news.yahoo.com/exclusive-russia-carried-out-a-stunning-breach-of-fb…

4 3

UBI begins 2020 - brutal end Trump - “It's $1K to be Huwaite” - spicy YangGang 2020 election - [PEACE]
by Zenaan Harkness 13 Jan '20

13 Jan '20

UBI? You bet it! Trump has lost his base. Trump is a MIGA shill (Make Israel Great Again). About that - almost the entire USA BigGov is MIGA. "Oh no! AIPAC does not exist, and even if it does it serves the American people because Israel is our greatest ally! MAGA!" MIGA Shills Fail to Deliver the May-Mays https://dailystormer.name/miga-shills-fail-to-deliver-the-may-mays/ The manufacturing, transport and much of the commercial world shall largely/ continue to, automate, with jobs disappearing as a result. With trade and commerce, comes a money pyramid. Setting aside for another conversation the fiat ponzi that is the non-constitutional Federal Reserve banking system (which is neither federal, nor reserve), whoever prints the money (Rothschilds or your Gov.) does not change the wealth percolating to the top of the pyramid hierarchy. Removing the Federal Reserve from the mix simply means a potentially much longer time frame before bubbles burst, and possibly greater stability. So, at the moment, most of the money printed each year goes to service debt (i.e. goes to the Rothschilds) and most of the rest goes to Lockheed Martin and Co. In the USA, assume ~300 million people, getting $1K per month, this = ~ $300 billion per month into citizens hands. The majority of that goes to rent, food, transport, electricity and communications. I.e., straight into the economy with its consequent multi level taxation and money velocity - i.e., a fair whack goes back to Gov. and the rest goes to those at the top of the commerce pyramid. That's better than the majority of each month's Gov "money" print going to the Rothschilds and Lockheed Martin Death Complex. So, +1 for UBI in the neo world novo economy ...

1 5

[gilmay97@gmail.com: WHO admits polio outbreak in the Philippines caused by polio vaccines…outbreak “caused by vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2”]
by Zenaan Harkness 07 Jan '20

07 Jan '20

----- Forwarded message from Gil May <gilmay97(a)gmail.com> ----- From: Gil May <gilmay97(a)gmail.com> To: reader(a)gmail.com Bcc: zen(a)freedbms.net Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 06:58:37 +1000 Subject: WHO admits polio outbreak in the Philippines caused by polio vaccines…outbreak “caused by vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2” WHO admits polio outbreak in the Philippines caused by polio vaccines… outbreak “caused by vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2” Wednesday, October 09, 2019 by: Mike Adams <https://www.naturalnews.com/author/healthranger> The polio vaccine has caused an escalating outbreak of polio in the Philippines, according to the World Health Organization and UNICEF, which issued a joint statement admitting the vaccine is causing polio. “WHO and UNICEF said in a joint statement the polio outbreak in the Philippines is concerning because it is caused by vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2,” writes the Associated Press <https://apnews.com/d954ca949bf34124bc980d4e2f732b16>. “The weakened virus used in vaccines replicates for a short time in children’s intestines and is excreted in their feces.” Polio vaccines are often cited as a success story proving that vaccines work to eliminate infectious disease. In truth, *nearly all the cases of polio in the modern world are caused by polio vaccines* themselves. Stated plainly, more cases of polio are caused by polio vaccines than from wild polio. *Polio vaccines are creating “super polio” strains that threaten humanity* Oral polio vaccines are actually “spawning virulent strains” of polioviruses, reports Children’s Health Defense <https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/childrens-health/polio-vaccination-…> : *The alarming surge in vaccine-derived polio cases presents vaccine planners with a “quandary” or “conundrum”—because “The very tool you are using for [polio] eradication is causing the problem.” …Vaccine researchers have long known that these OPV-derived viruses can themselves cause polio, particularly when they get “loose in the environment.”* The Associated Press story admits that it has been over 25 years since polio in the Philippines was contracted from a “wild strain.” Since 1993, *all the cases of polio in the Philippines have been caused by polio vaccines*. Via AP: * [T]he last known case from a wild strain of the virus in the Philippines was in 1993…* *Associated Press admits vaccines kill children* The AP also admits that vaccines kill children: *The government’s immunization programs were marred in 2017 by a dengue fever vaccine made by French drugmaker Sanofi Pasteur which some Philippine officials linked to the deaths of at least three children. Duque and other Philippine health officials say they have worked to restore public trust in vaccines since then.* Even worse, as the AP admits, vaccines for dengue fever were actually found to *increase the risk of severe dengue infections*: *The government halted the dengue immunization drive after Sanofi said a study showed the vaccine may increase the risk of severe dengue infections. More than 830,000 children received the Dengvaxia vaccine under the campaign, which was launched in 2016 and halted in 2017. Sanofi officials said the Dengvaxia vaccine was safe and would reduce dengue infections if the vaccination drive continued.* *Vaccine “science” is a fraud* Modern vaccine “science” is a total fraud. Vaccines kill or maim millions of children around the world each year, yet any journalist who investigates the toxicity of vaccine ingredients or the science fraud behind vaccine propaganda is immediately banned from all major tech platforms, including Google, Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Pinterest and even Vimeo. No facts about vaccines are allowed to be shared or discussed. The corrupt, criminally-operated vaccine industry controls the narrative across all tech giants — including Wikipedia — as well as Hollywood, universities and medical journals. The vaccine industry *murders children for profit*, then silences anyone who works to protect children from the scourge of dangerous immunizations carried out with toxic ingredients like aborted human fetal tissue, aluminum, mercury and chemical adjuvants. Watch this shocking video revealing the truth about aborted human fetal cells used in vaccines, totally admitted by the CDC and vaccine manufacturers: https://www.brighteon.com/034ebfcb-5bf8-4bcf-abf2-ee106a2eecba ----- End forwarded message -----

2 2

The heart of a Scotsman - George Galloway, The Chilcot Report: What Next?
by Zenaan Harkness 06 Jan '20

06 Jan '20

The wheels of "democracy" when it works, when someone with heart, patience, tenacity and a strong sense of justice (a mighty lot to ask, so we can be very grateful for this man of principal) such as George Galloway, is an event worth witnessing, given how rare such events are. George Galloway you have been vindicated. Thank you for speaking so clearly. "Mr Blair: This Is For Iraq (Video)" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVNmy5-2va8 (Youtube link also here: http://russia-insider.com/en/politics/mr-blair-iraq/ri15485 )

2 7

Leaked draft NASA/NOAA US climate change report
by grarpamp 06 Jan '20

06 Jan '20

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/894858959110254592 https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3914641/Draft-of-the-Climate-Sci…

2 1

Assassination Politics AP
by grarpamp 05 Jan '20

05 Jan '20

> limited funds The first number of successful AP influences (proving runs) might be performed via AP boards that allow users to specify runoff of their donations, but that do not show that computation to potential predictors. Such that the influence funds shown as available to predictors might put every target of influence at the same rate, or at least raise the apparent reward for all targets across the board on average given the variety of runoff donations expected. This might give the initial handful of proving predictors equal incentive to prove the system. ie: Whereas a pool of willing predictors might not be in regional proximity to the hot targets, this could also serve to level that out, if again, helpful for the proving case. Similar to leveling soft and hard targets into easier proofs. On the other hand, such runoff and or levelling systems may be seen as artificial market regulations that should not be implemented.

5 21

Serious Punk yo! -- Fw: FINALLY - a valid use for trannies - DEFEATING SLUTS! - [PEACE]
by Zenaan Harkness 19 Dec '19

19 Dec '19

Folks the following is the epitomy of the zeitgeist - how can this even be happening, it's 2018 already I'm literally shaking. Thankfully, this be "Our Tranny", shredding the fields in women's sports, so go nationalism right? :D This be some medicine that the politically correct crowd are in desperate need for - if we gonna turn our world upside down, Australia better benefit from it. Yo :) Did I mention "yo"? ----- Forwarded message from Google(a)StealsDomains.com ----- From: 1488anon(a)GoogleAndGodaddyStealDomains.com Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 19:16:34 +1100 Subject: FINALLY - a valid use for trannies - DEFEATING SLUTS! Less than a year ago, I could never have imagined saying "Fella's, we've found a use for trannies." You might like this :D https://dailystormer.name/absolute-unit-tranny-dominates-sluts-at-handball-… God that's good! An Aussie bloke defeating sports-pretender sluts all across Asia, and hopefully the world! :D :D GO Australia! Enjoy <cheeky garfield smile> -- Swastika-clad Russian Neon-Nazi Minx hunter since AT LEAST 1488. Da Ministry of Da Triggering. ----- End forwarded message -----

1 1

Your Cypherpunks archive
by jim bell 19 Dec '19

19 Dec '19

I have just discovered a startling omission in your Cypherpunks archive. A HUGE number of postings on the subject of AP, my assassination politics essay, which I began posting maybe about April/May 1995 are simply not there. And, in fact, postings on the subject of AP at least until early November 1995 seem to be missing. And perhaps after November 1995. I don't know what other classes of emails may also be missing, but I think it will be very important to find out this information. I looked at the archive because I wanted to determine the earliest that the subject of "Assassination Politics" appeared on the Cypherpunks list. It might have been April 1995.Note: as weird as it may sound, there are reasons that this material might have been tampered with, but I don't know what time the tampering occurred. We are discussing this on the Cypherpunks list. I assume you will want to participate. Jim Bell

6 27

Tor Stinks re Traffic Analysis and Sybil (as do other networks)
by grarpamp 19 Dec '19

19 Dec '19

> recommend utilizing Tor to combat government surveillance If users adversaries operate under whichever governments classification levels such as TOP SECRET FVEY, and especially if the users are doing something that such govts would take personal affront to, such users need to do some serious thinking. > low-latency This phrase is misused by many as if it were some kind of litmus test for determining TA resistance... it is not. It's likely possible to create a LL network that traffic analysis cannot penetrate even with every single link tapped. Latency, purely by itself, does not define whether or not a network is secure against traffic analysis. Latency (whatever level therein) really refers to the useability different categories of apps would have at such level... the user experience. > "All ... systems as currently designed and deployed are essentially > broken against The Man" Surely generally true by now. Tor's nearly 25 year old design since inception is nothing more than a bunch of free proxies that users chain through (same as VPN's). Perhaps a bit better than VPN by maybe weighting traffic towards busy, plus an assortment of other things, and some more worse than VPN due to obvious simplicity of infesting the network with a nasty case of Sybil to the tune of 100+ nodes a month in some months. Luckily the dumb ones are caught, but it's not those that users should worry about. Like VPN, Tor is good at giving users a different IP that the everyday world of civilian / commercial endpoints has a hard time tracing. But hardly so good at resisting what Govt's and GigaCorps can now analyze and attack. Even independant smalltime researchers are confirming TA and Sybil methods against Tor and many other overlay networks. As to the *PA's listed before, they've had the thought, vantage, access, coordination, tech, money, etc to TA, and certainly to Sybil, just about any overlay network since about the time such networks came into being. 1995 2000 2005 and if by 2010 and Snowden people weren't assessing that capability exists, even based only on opensource research, well pity the fool. TA, Sybil, *PA's, GT-1's etc are no longer just some sidebar caveats in highbrow whitepapers to be dismissed and buried. There needs to be new networks deployed that take those as their top design considerations over all others. > https://www.schneier.com/blog/ Schneier seems much more a friend of govcorp (ie Counterpane), and a generic blogwonk, than any sort of genuine users activist taking any sort of strongly voiced principled stand on anything that matters. As Chiefs on Tor Board one might look for Schneier and Blaze to be publicly saying and doing some project, Tor or other, regarding TA, Sybil, or even disproving them if they weren't real threats, or at least something... instead Tor and other nets are often crickets on that. (Old congressional testimonies are also oldsauce, stir up some new hot chili.) Note also that Tor doesn't need to actually care about its users security to play whatever legal test and game in the courts that it and it's lawyers are lined up waiting to play (remember Tor was tied with EFF for many years for various reasons). How are users to be indemnified by anyone, if not first by themselves using the security of a network itself, and if the network is not capable, then what. Regardless of whether Tor etc is good or bad or none of the above, holding a near monopoly in the space on cashflow, legal, steering tech, discourse, twatterverse populism, etc... for ~10-15 years... is not good situation. Competition is healthy. And while the design of today's networks is largely unchangeable by nature of being deployed, their adversaries are adapting to leverage clearly whitepapered weaknesses in those designs since years. New networks... from internet overlay, fiber, radio, carrier pigeon, dropgangs... need to be researched, coded, and deployed by new players. Anyway, have some traffic noise generators... http://trackmenot.io/ https://adnauseam.io/

12 44

IQNets: user classes, network locality, quid pro quo, torrents at core, on gaming reputation
by Zenaan Harkness 13 Dec '19

13 Dec '19

The IQNets network is a friend to friend network. IQNets provides for links to, and routes through, unknown peers/nodes (ala bittorrent). IQNets is built on certain principles such as quid pro quo. For example, since primary network entry is via friends, friends are giving or sharing bandwidth between themselves. IQNets incentivizes sharing ([private request from Bill to John] "yo John, can you stay online for 20 minutes, I want to finish downloading last year's GoT.") Such requests may be broadcast to your group of friends, and possibly their friends, possibly anonymously (but verifiably as belonging to one of your friends if you previously established the appropriate cryptographic comms ring/net; Getting more friend nodes results in greater maximum up/download capacity for any one node at a time (given typically bursty nature of impatient youtube watchers and movie downloaders), thus motivating meat space connections. also, friends don't dominate friend's internet connections - friends have a far greater tendency/incentive, to play nice with one another, than completely anonymous "fly by night" contacts. Classes of nodes (from a node's perspective): - direct friend nodes with a meat space asserted trust level, which may be anywhere on the trust axis - both above and below zero - indirect "friend of friend" nodes and so on - "unknown" nodes, once you get beyond friends of friends of friends I guess - there is also every reason to utilize a bittorrent style DHT to make contact with "genuinely 'unknown' nodes" - DHT bootstrapping? also, read up on PEX Classes of locality: - legal jurisdiction locality - relevant magnitude is most likely "nation" or "state" - ISP locality - other IQNets users within my ISP - "roaming" IPv6 addresses? Is this a thing yet? - If this exists, it could be called dynamic network locality, and is probably important and useful to know about. - Certainly seizing dynamic connectivity by the horns is going to be useful for maximizing "ad hoc p2p wireless" within a crowd of people. Classes of quid pro quo: - network connectivity - storage/ content caching resources (design TODO) Storage metrics, just as with network metrics, are also maintained in order to establish fairness - quid pro quo. At its most basic, the internet is about making available, and downloading, content of one form or another, be it tweets, web pages, movies or phone calls; iow, the internet is a content distribution network. The internet as it was conceived has core design principles which are desirable for robustness and censorship resistance, such as peer to peer communications and flexible routing. In practice, the internet today falls somewhat short of its founding ideals due primarily to our governments (military) stalking us and snooping on us, and corporations (profit at all costs) interests. A bittorrent like protocol shall form the fundament of IQNets, with configurable settings which would impact possible levels of privacy and anonymity. In other words, the goal is high speed and relatively efficient network utilization for arbitrary, and arbitrarily large, content distribution, whilst maintaining configurable levels of (at least partially achievable) privacy and anonymity. I.e. "large file distribution" is a first class citizen in the IQNets network. With a shout out to cypherpunk Juan for suggesting the idea. IQNets - making the impossible possible. Framed in the terms of our fundamental human rights, IQNets reclaims for all end user "nodes", the role of primary authority; echos of GNS (GNU Name Server) design principles. On gaming reputation: - nodes self declare intentions or expectations such as bandwidth, uptime/ connectivity, the node's estimated/assumed monthly quota, suitable times for use of bandwidth (peak vs off peak), and more. - metrics are empirically measured of course and stored so that sane and safe routing and connection decisions can be made - friends share metrics (at least, on request) - nodes may collude to proclaim "great metrics" amongst themselves, which they broadcast to other nodes who ask, but ultimately, the empirical evidence that I observe, is the primary metrics data of relevance, followed by that shared with me by my 'friends', and finally, that which other nodes self declare

3 8