August 2018 - cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

Re: [Cryptography] Krugman blockchain currency skepticism
by grarpamp 16 Aug '18

16 Aug '18

On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Kreuter <brk7bx(a)virginia.edu> wrote: >> > beginning of this thread was a proposal that the problem is that >> > the >> > government might target an activist group's finances. Now it >> > sounds >> > like you are talking about the government trying to attack the >> > entire >> > payment system. >> >> That is indeed a valid problem. >> Among many others in many sectors and applications. > > What is your point? Someone made one point above, that many failed to grasp... Old world fiat and fiat systems are vulnerable to attack, in ways that are not possible to fix, because the failures are intrinsic to and result from the system they reside in and spawn from. Decentralized cryptocurrencies are newborn from an alien mother and delivered by the great dropship Satoshi. Don't expect them to look the same, or to confom, or to share even a fraction of the same vulnerability space. > The question, again, is what problem are you > trying to solve with cryptocurrency? Can you give a clear and specific > answer to that question? The documentary links provided in thread contain a rather large number of problems and answers. Please consult them rather than asking for them to be transcribed in full herein. >> For so long as free speech, encryption, and overlay networks exist, >> cryptocurrency and the internet cannot be shutdown. > > How has that worked out for the citizens of North Korea? > Encryption > and overlay networks get you nowhere when the government refuses to > allow something like the Internet to exist. Exactly. DPRK has never had freedom since its founding, so of course DPRK will never willingly give that to its subjects. Funny that Anti cryptocurrency people always end up making Pro arguments. How is that working out you ask?... https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=smuggling+into+north+korea Let's just say that any freedom in the world is a result of being able to deploy freedom faster and harder than governments and corporations can react and resist. Push harder my friends, mush mush mush!!! > It is not at all hard to > imagine regulations on telecom companies that would make > cryptocurrencies impossible. The government could require telecoms to > drop any packets that are not used to interact with a properly licensed > service (no peer-to-peer networking allowed, no experimentation on the > public Internet, etc.). They could. Or you could get up off your ass, go visit with the telecoms, and require them to stand up with your sales dollars, with you, for both of your freedom. If they refuse, they're not your friends or in your best interest, they're your enemies... so remove your funds, crash their silly parties and go start your own that are. Same with your govenment. Also, taking candy from babies is *really hard*, and all you Westerners are a bunch of seriously addicted babies. It's not at all hard to imagine the amount of crying and resisting you will do then they try to take your sweet sweet internet, and your free and happy research experimentation, away from you, and replace it with Woobie TV, or how about just good old fashioned State run TV broadcast over loudspeakers like DPRK. That's what you're "imagining", arguing, and accepting with all your Anti comments. Or you could do the right thing and stand up against it... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qa8SRN86V8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nl88J8KOLlY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bIvt9snFQig >> If you accept, >> either personally or as a populace, the shutting of your connection > > Most people would not complain about heavy-handed licensing of Internet > applications because most people would not perceive themselves as being > affected by it. All the popular services and applications will be > licensed and will do whatever the government says they need to do to > stay in business. More apologist suggestions and pre programming by the state to get people to quietly accept your overtures. Disgusting. > Funny, because people from unstable countries with weak governments > that do not effectively enforce the law seem to want to live in > countries with effective law enforcement and stable governments. Maybe > they are tired of having bands of lawless brigands rob them at > gunpoint, or they have seen too many murderers go unpunished, or they > would rather settle disputes peacefully in a courtroom than with > bullets. As you just said, Government is not the source of such peaceful advances. It is the people who have changed their own thinking, away from being assholes to each other, to being good, and seeking a place to develop and excercise it. They are the ones who either revolt such obscenely intolerable situations, or move, to achieve that. You *never* see such extant governments just wake up, sans dire protest and threat from subjects, and transform themselves. Now with all the Earth's land titled, what exactly do you think folks like Musk in Space and the Free Stater's are trying to do peacefully under such intolerable confines... > The fact of the matter is that markets have never worked without a > government of some kind. Here is a basic question for you: if there > is no government, why should I respect the blockchain? You pay me for > some goods, and then I fail to deliver. Now what are you going to do? False. People engage in transactions based on reputation, risk, profitability, due diligience, as is where is, insurance, and many other factors and metrics. Those doing that analysis will have good results, and nowhere was, or need be, govenment in that. When you hear 'not worth going after', that means the analysis worked to contain losses within acceptable limits. When you hear 'they scammed me', that means the analysis wasn't performed. It's your fault. And the odds of getting any whole back are commensurately slim. Furthermore, the blockchain is self respecting by design. When everyone is educated about the blockchain, decentralized cryptocurrencies, which they should be, at minimum by their wallet introducers, to the the philosophical and operating space and the requirements of them therein, it works. Else yes, you'll lose value, same as with fiat. > Most > people are happy to live under a government as long as the government > does not bother them too much. Most people are willing to pay taxes, > and some people are proud to do so and > consider any effort to evade taxes to be stealing. Taxes are theft upon those who do not both voluntarily and explicitly agree to it, nor to the great many line items of tax expenditure. There are many excellent resources on this subject... https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=taxation+is+theft Please become well informed by watching the videos on that page before attempting to make further arguments. "Most people" haven't done that, let alone ever heard about it, due of course to the fake news you clamor for and permit and "license"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-TqgQd1cLl8 >> https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=banks+fear+bitcoin > > Banks do not fear Bitcoin. In fact, a growing list of banks and > payment processors are paying for blockchain and cryptocurrency R&D, > and some are starting to trade in cryptocurrencies (Goldman Sachs is > one example). I have heard mixed opinions on cryptocurrencies from > people in that industry, but I have yet to hear anyone express any > fear. You have to qualify what they're doing deeper... - Decentralized cryptocurrencies... fear. Nothing but lowly retail servicers, wallet curation and payment order taking companies, easily ditched when someone learns and wishes to do it on their own. - Centralized cryptocurrencies... no fear. Partners, in control, of the entire system, fiat, fees, usury, inflation, forfeiture, arbitrary, "custodial" "brokerage", as usual. >> https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=governments+fear+bitcoin > > Maybe some governments are afraid, but the US government has been > fairly open minded so far -- other than regulating cryptocurrencies the > way other tradeable assets are regulated, the US government has allowed > people to experiment with cryptocurrencies, to use cryptocurrencies for > various kinds of businesses, and even pays for research on how to > protect the privacy of blockchain transactions. The regulation effort > is mostly motivated by the growing number of scams in cryptocurrency > markets, and in the end those regulations will actually make > cryptocurrency markets stronger and more accessible to "ordinary" > people. Again, you have to dig deeper very closely into what exactly they're banning, promoting, and being [coyly] agnostic about, and why. "Scams" were addressed above. > -- [Whoever] It's no secret that those who derive their salaries from taxation by force of government, do and will continue to promote the same. For example, certain of you might be found here... https://www.ccis.northeastern.edu/people-view-all/ http://www.virginia.edu/cs/people/grads/ And until each and every one of all the Anti cryptocurrency punditry, regulators, lawmakers, lobbies, naysayers, and so on... has actually installed a decentralized cryptocurrency wallet, and received and sent decentralized cryptocurrency in transaction for goods and services... actually experiencing the potential new models and philosophies firsthand... their words are both laughably hypocritical and shamefully uninformed. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2018/08/15/23-fascinating-bitcoin-… What's in your wallet? For those who haven't had, get the experience for a while, then come talk. Preferably also as part of your local cryptocurrency meetup.

1 0

Hemisphere Project: Parallel Constructing Your World For You
by grarpamp 15 Aug '18

15 Aug '18

https://muckrock.s3.amazonaws.com/foia_files/7-3-14_MR6608_RES.pdf Whether for apprehending "criminal" marijuana producers, distributors, users... or for the high crime of social programming and control... all the world's databases, secret surveillance spying, and feelgood swiss cheese that are government's and corporation's fake non-"privacy" policies, TV... etc... ... applied, in secret, against you. Discover, interpolate, extrapolate, postulate... learn motherfuckers... connect all the facts and possiblities of the deep game they're all playing. You let them program into you that their abuse of you is ok. Maybe it's time you wake up and deprogram them. End the Matrix.

1 0

Re: [Cryptography] Krugman blockchain currency skepticism
by grarpamp 15 Aug '18

15 Aug '18

[Resending four replies in one to participants bcc uncensored cypherpunks, as censorship on an already moderator approved, thus explicitly moderator solicited, variety thread where moderator already censored the queue twice resent, and moderator approved questions by posters in thread were left unanswered and silently ignored via moderators censorship... is hypocritical, especially so for topics within charter... "technical, social, political, security, privacy, legal, and multinational aspects of cryptosystems". Cheers all and enjoy the sunlight, tis all.] On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 4:11 PM, Benjamin Kreuter <brk7bx(a)virginia.edu> wrote: > On Mon, 2018-08-06 at 14:11 +0800, jamesd(a)echeque.com wrote: > As others have asked, what is the problem we want to solve? The > beginning of this thread was a proposal that the problem is that the > government might target an activist group's finances. Now it sounds > like you are talking about the government trying to attack the entire > payment system. That is indeed a valid problem. Among many others in many sectors and applications. >> A crypto currency needs to be centerless - it needs to able to >> survive the seizure of key servers by a hostile powerful party. True, a properly decentralized cryptocurrency has no such seizable / sueable servers. Decentralization is under attack in more ways than most people realize, not just by the purposeful noise deluge of junk / centralized coins, tokens, ico's... but also by very insidious methods. As an example... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYHFrf5ci_g https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BZoKH-hX_o https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKYEQVPklLI https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=bitcoin+censorship https://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinMarkets/comments/6rxw7k/informative_btc_vs_… Whether you're a user, code / crypto developer, business, whatever... you need to understand these things and be able to spot them, call them out, and exchange and adopt away from them once they happen. In the cryptocurrency space, there is no birthright, let alone against treason, or any other lesser offense. A bit more from the series... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOZaLbUUZUs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgts1qb0hLY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGrUOLsC9cw > Get back to me when the Internet itself cannot be shut down by the > government. For so long as free speech, encryption, and overlay networks exist, cryptocurrency and the internet cannot be shutdown. If you accept, either personally or as a populace, the shutting of your connection and or the disablement of your crypto, for mere agnostic tool use, and for no provable reason otherwise, then you're fucked. If the Four Hoursemen of the Infocalypse didn't do it already, then the only thing left is a bonafide threat to the existance of government itself... to its taxes collected by force. Once people worldwide start to figure out they can bypass the redundancy, inefficiency, non choice, war, etc of governments by moving their transactions onto the encrypted blockchain networks... that's the last game... you either sheeple out forever into a questionable existance, or make your stand. Don't be a sheeple.. https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=banks+fear+bitcoin https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=governments+fear+bitcoin On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 6:05 PM, John Levine <johnl(a)iecc.com> wrote: > In article <CAD2Ti29oru2WUyQ01gr+UL1M-cAAvj0ZuVraPGeULnYz7TqtvQ(a)mail.gmail.com>, > grarpamp <grarpamp(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Cryptocurrency value moved every month is 30x paypal's and growing. >> Ten more years and those 200 million users will be on cryptocurrency. > > Paypal's current transaction volume is about $40 billion/month, > growing at a modest rate. Can you tell us where you get your number > of $1.2 trillion/month for cryptocurrencies? > https://www.statista.com/statistics/277841/paypals-total-payment-volume/ That should have been ~3x (2.7x) coming from just the BTC value volume moved, and ~385B$/mo for the entire cryptocurrency space, both using today's coinmarketcap rates. Paypal is also doing ~295 tx/s, which might just be eclipsed by even early iterations of below stress work with a single cryptocurrency (even more when summing the current capabilities of top 10 decentralized cryptos for example representing and carrying the market space for tx / tps)... https://stresstestbitcoin.cash/ ~25.6M tx/d will beat Paypal, with perhaps only 33% of that needed to make news waves. Paypal claims ~245M "active" users, or 3.2% of world pop, which smells a little fishy. BTC alone has ~55M utxo's, consolidated down into owned wallets at recent oppurtunity from peak of ~68M, some study estimates try taking that down further to approx body count. Cryptocurrency has no worries there either, and again, starts making waves before then. And Paypal has never made the world's daily syndicated TV and print news like cryptocurrency has. Regardless of which sources you choose, cryptocurrency is close at the heels of Paypal, already biting off chunks in some areas, including philosophical ones. Expect Paypal to be completely eclipsed by cryptocurrency in five years or less. >>> If an issuer doesn't redeem a bill >>> what recourse do you have other than to denounce him? >> Cryptocurrency... you either have the keys and value or you don't. > I don't want a wallet hash That's smart, because whoever told you you could spend such a construct is a fraud. > these were bills redeemable in real assets. > I want my kilo of platinum or whatever. > What's my recourse when the platinum doesn't show up? Precisely, such bills are a risk with variable recourse. "Bills of exchange by different issuers" The blockchain takes care of issues with "issuers" "bills" and reputation, you either have the confirmed spend or you don't, and you're stupid if you walk off before you do. And the market takes care what other "assets" one can get in "exchange" for the UTXO's you're about to spend. You're of course free to make and sign whatever other contracts / bills you want, call them private pegs / tethers if it makes you happy, and accept all their risks. This is basically arguing volatility again, and what cryptocurrency is saying, Neo, is that you won't need to. [1] Those who argue volatility against decentralized cryptocurrency shouldn't do so as what they're saying is they... - really want centralized regulated fiat equivalents - clearly don't get that *of course* by their very nature decentralized cryptocurrencies are *expected* to be "volatile" early on. This is an innate feature, not a bug. But hey while people are on the "volatility" tip, look at all the other *volatile* central regulated fiats out there both new and old... https://wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states_by_date_of_formation https://wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_currencies And lots of other reasons you might not want them... https://wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_former_sovereign_states https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_historical_geopolitical_changes All that pegging, tethering, backing, and government guns people say gives [nonvolatile] value... doesn't seem to be doing a very good job of it. Perhaps it's time the world, and you, tries something truly different, for once, in like thousands of years, of not doing so, lol. It's out there, and could be in your wallet today, and spent in some equitable trade tomorrow. # others > Obviously, you can be cut off by governments, payment processors, > exchanges, [etc list of formal entities] Nowhere in those blurbs was the direct P2P functionality of decentralized cryptocurrencies mentioned... much harder to cut that off without nuking the underlying [sneaker] nets, the difficulty of that mentioned in another thread. > Reputation is entirely based upon non-repudiation, and liability (provably > having sufficient real assets to cover their outstanding balance). > Blockchain currency doesn't have either of those properties. Neither does fiat. Try and invent them on top of them if you want. > Manafort is also learning About decentralized cryptocurrencies, and the gold watch, along with the rest of the world's people. On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 7:24 PM, Bill Frantz <frantz(a)pwpconsult.com> wrote: > OK, I can't resist any longer. Let's look at some payment and store of value > systems: Ok... > Gold metal: > Terrible for electronic payment. Transferring electronic stock in GLD, or other forms of gold securities, works fine, is slow and a lot of paperwork, but most would be terribly happy to receive it instead of being stiffed. > Likely to be accepted anywhere fiat currencies are weak. Like Venezuela, Greece, Zimbabwe, etc... anyplace undergoing any volatility or inflation event, now or past, since gold was removed / banned from standard worldwide... anyone have links to news articles where any economically significant fraction of the affected populous in such places was carrying around and using gold instead of wheelbarrows full of fiat? None? > Can be converted to fiat currencies where they are strong Everything is convertible to any other thing, wherever and whenever, doesn't mean you or your counterparty will want to, at times it might be best to drop it in the rubbish, or keep it. > Can be converted to fiat currencies, but the transaction may have to be reported. "Have to" vs "is" vs "you volunteered" info are different things. > If you become a refugee, gold can be carried with you. Up to your limited capacity to securely carry weight and bulk. > Can be stolen at gunpoint. Carry a gun. > Doesn't earn interest. It can. > The gold standard. :-) Though fair a meme nonetheless, with cryptocurrency a challenger approaching from a distance. > Dollar, Euro, Pound Sterling (well regarded fiat currencies): > Can be used with electronic payment systems. Not before converting that paper / metal / poly physical into something entirely different... digits in a database. > Likely to be accepted anywhere. > Easy to convert to other currencies Not really, it's a pain to convert back, assuming you even knew how to authenticate and wanted the foreign physical in the first place.. > If you become a refugee, notes are transportable and accounts can be accessed > if not frozen. (Pick a good jurisdiction for that account.) They don't let you bring in "good" fiats, they keep it for themselves. You're not funding that account electronically through the tight regime you have to refugee from. Nor are you transporting their junk it past all their checkpoint thieves on the way out, nor is it useful on the other side. > gunpoint, accounts can be protected from that attack. Thug points to your / bankers dome. Govt thugs do same, civil forfeiture, etc. > Relatively stable in value over the long term Nice smooth steady loss and redistribution, lovely. Case Shiller Index... 2007 deja vu and pop before long. > Accounts can earn interest. But don't, not enough to even beat inflation these days, a terrible SOV and investment. > What world commerce runs on. Can run on cryptocurrencies. > Bitcoin: > Not accepted everywhere. Can be. > the transaction is recorded in the blockchain, leaving a record. Which if using cryptographically private ZKP blockchain like Zcash (ZEC), is currently thought to be entirely private thus off the record. > Can be converted to fiat currencies for > wide acceptance everywhere In the future, Neo, you won't have to. > If you become a refugee, transport is limited by the electronic devices you can > take with you. False. Memorize your brainwallet passphrase. Encode keys on or in your body, clothing, luggage, books. Ship ahead, or shard among people, or stash online. Limitless secure options. > Wildly changing value over the recent short term FUD from anti's who don't understand introduction of new things, decentralized cryptocurrencies into free markets, all covered before. And Impressive increasing value over any long term window beyond a year. > and no long-term track record. Nine years and counting, impressive for something that's pissing off and disrupting fiat govt / banks worldwide. Hardly Pokemon or Linden Dollars. > Can't earn interest Value on "deposit" is value invested. Investments can earn. Unless you invest them in shitty things like Lehman Brothers. While cryptocurrency rising in adoption phase, it eats all others, so no sane person can or will pay returns denominated in it, until there are entirely cryptocurrency based businesses, investment vehicles and cycles, or if its rate of rise falls below other vehicles. Better to just buy / sell / short it directly. > Not widely used in commerce. Nothing stopping that but you. > Eggs: > (from the Economist Buttonwood column 7/21/2018 on hyperinflation in > Venezuela): Not usable for electronic payment. Generally accepted for > payment in Venezuela. Can be sold as a commodity in most locations and > converted to other currencies. Not normally tracked by governments. Hard > boiling recommended should you become a refugee to improve transportability. > Destroyed by fire, but small fires may help them make a good meal. > Relatively stable value over the long term, but individual eggs spoil in a > matter of weeks to months. Can't earn interest. Used in commerce in limited > locations suffering hyperinflation. Can directly provide human nourishment. Can earn interest... give recently fertilized eggs to someone to hatch under contract, you make eggs in return. I'd peg / tether your price in cryptocurrency for a dozen eggs to each of every one of today's hundreds of cryptocurrencies, at today's exchange rate, provided you buy all the eggs you eat each month, from me, at the aforementioned static crypto/egg peg, using the cryptocurrency of my choice at each purchase, for the rest of your life. You'll always pay the same amount of whichever crypto for your eggs, zero volatility, guaranteed. I reserve the right to add any new cryptocurrency at any time pegging it for you at that time, and to terminate contract at any time by delivering a dozen hens a laying to you. Feel free to hedge your backend with Tether (USDT)... https://tether.to/ "Every day that goes by and [Cryptocurrency] hasn't collapsed due to legal or technical problems, that brings new information to the market. It increases the chance of [Cryptocurrency's] eventual success and justifies a higher price." -- Hal Finney Most people are simply closed minded old dog programmed statist sheeple incapable of free thought outside their box (TV box too). That's why they can't offer any debate sustainable reason why decentralized cryptocurrencies *cannot* be used as money. And why the cryptocurrency crowd, having made that leap, offers numerous reasons, designs, updates, and ways in which they *can*. For that matter, seems it'd be a lot more fun crypto coding completely novel decentralized cryptocurrencies, than off in a corner trying to digitize some crusty old fiat under orders from a government / banks with no freedom to change that model :) On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 1:47 AM, Rui Paulo via cryptography <cryptography(a)metzdowd.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2018-07-23 at 08:17 +0000, Peter Gutmann wrote: >> Dammit, why didn't I think of that? Just as the bottom is falling >> out of >> ICOs, someone comes up with a new way to extract money out of the >> gullible. >> >> https://www.cryptokitties.co/ >> >> tl;dr: >> >> 1. Use actual real money to buy Ethereum. >> 2. Use Ethereum to buy a cryptokitty. >> 3. ?? >> 4. ?? >> 5. No, not profit, just more ?? >> > > http://cryptopuppies.org/ Funny how this list will approve, 1up, and talk about the above [1], yet censor actual discussion of more serious areas of cryptocurrency, (note such with BTC being early on this list), which are in fact material relavant to the "technical, social, political, security, privacy, legal, and multinational aspects of cryptosystems' of its charter. [1] which are btw old way news now having been out for ten months, for which people are still rightfully free to evaluate investing in, using them as currency, or collect / trade / dispose on whim as deemed fit. bcc cypherpunks, to witness esteemed lolcat and cute puppy posters approved into the censorship / irony / fud log... and where you're actually free to cover relavant 'crypto' currency material, and even trade cryptokitties :)

3 2

Documentary: The Art Of Dissent
by grarpamp 15 Aug '18

15 Aug '18

https://www.npr.org/2018/08/04/635654200/ai-wei-weis-beijing-studio-destroy… https://www.bbc.com/news/video_and_audio/headlines/45073421/ai-weiwei-fans-… https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2018/aug/04/ai-weiwei-beijing-stud… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kmW7oTXgtQ8 https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ai+weiwei https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=jacob+appelbaum

1 0

Perhaps it is no longer appropriate for me to discuss computer vulnerabilities
by Ryan Carboni 15 Aug '18

15 Aug '18

But I should say that I suspect the reason for the complex three drug protocol in lethal injection is so that the latter two injections could be replaced by saline. One can only speculate.

1 0

Re: Peterson re Channel 4: "Look the fuck out!" - [zen@freedbms.net: OMG - hilarious - Jordan Peterson out of context]
by Zenaan Harkness 15 Aug '18

15 Aug '18

On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 09:57:01PM -0300, Juan wrote: > On Sun, 5 Aug 2018 10:03:56 +1000 > Zenaan Harkness <zen(a)freedbms.net> wrote: > > > I'm confident it would be very useful for Peterson to listen to you > > for an hour or three, face to face. > > I highly doubt it would be useful for him. > > What might be somewhat more useful is for you to ask him about the countless times he shows his true fascist colors. for instance...from the video you linked > > 1:32:20 > "western hierarchies are based in large part on competence" > (sickening lie of course) based ~= premised competence is the premise, notwithstanding the widespread, endemic, systemic and apparently completely overwhelming corruption we see with the MIC, International Banking (nation enslavement) etc. And yes, you can make the case that the American system is premised on fascism and slavery. That's a case that would be good for someone to make in a compelling way which resonates with people generally - someone sufficiently capable of doing so could well become the next "modern intellectual" superstar, do the interview circuit and go face to face with Peterson. Until and unless something even begins approaching that happens, it seems Peterson's position will prevail. > 1:37:20 > "[hierarchies] are unjust but they are also USEFUL" (...) > > and notice how the very moment he makes the mistake of saying > that fascism is 'useful' the piece of shit embarks in a 'story' > equivocating the word 'hierarchy'. I can accept that there may be some utility to conflating 'hierarchy' with 'fascism'. However, to do so generally is at the very least a superficial generalisation. Hone your argument/ get more specific, otherwise what the (literally now millions) of Peterson indoctrinated folks are simply going to hear in those words of yours the claim that "lobster hiearchies are fascist dictatorships" which is EXACTLY the "leftist marxist" crap that Peterson is countering. So, without a nuanced response to Peterson's nuanced (and "science" backed, FWIW) position, I suspect your position that Peterson is somehow "equivocating on the word 'hierarchy'" won't get so very far... just a hunch. > Now, I'm sure your understanding of libertarian philosophy is a > lot better than peterson's. Also your english is a lot better > than mine. And you think there's something valuably in peterson(I It seems that Peterson has not put his mind to libertarian philosophy, and this is unfortunate - but until he does, I am making the assumption that he has yet to actually put his mind to libertarian philosophy and I am hopeful that he will do so, and soon. Anyone with his ear should encourage him in exactly this way, perhaps encouraging him to read some easy to read books on the topic (Bakunin?). > of course don't) - So....YOU should try talking to him, and see > what you get. I did email him that 'tube (which has been censored, so I uploaded it as a private vid - holler if anyone wants the link), showing the varied newspaper articles and reports from 1917 (around) onwards, all the way up to the mid to late 1930s, from the New York Times and others, bemoaning the "6 million Jewish souls" who had "perished" in Europe - this is all PRIOR to World War II or course, thus putting the firetrucking lie "muh holocaust" bullshit - thus the holohoax. This was about half a year ago. But I've had no response. I don't "have his ear" unfortunately. Perhaps someone else does... (In time, I intend to try again to communicate with JP on other topics.)

1 0

“Free speech is not just another value. It's the foundation of Western civilization.” - Dr Peterson
by Zenaan Harkness 14 Aug '18

14 Aug '18

“Free speech is not just another value. It's the foundation of Western civilization.” http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-37875695 Toronto professor Jordan Peterson takes on gender-neutral pronouns By Jessica Murphy BBC News, Toronto, 4 November 2016

4 28

Assange vs Barrett Brown
by John Newman 14 Aug '18

14 Aug '18

https://www.thedailybeast.com/julian-assange-went-after-a-former-ally-it-ba… -- GPG fingerprint: 17FD 615A D20D AFE8 B3E4 C9D2 E324 20BE D47A 78C7

4 11

Peak-a-bo
by Steven Schear 14 Aug '18

14 Aug '18

https://apnews.com/828aefab64d4411bac257a07c1af0ecb/AP-Exclusive:-Google-tr…

4 4

an emergent basis for ethics (Jaak Panksepp, Jordan Peterson)
by Zenaan Harkness 14 Aug '18

14 Aug '18

Perhaps this is an easier to digest approach: Jaak Panksepp studied rats: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaak_Panksepp Why do rats laugh? Interview with Jaak Panksepp... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4ICY6-7hJo He not only discovered that rats laugh and giggle (just in frequencies above what we humans can normally hear), he discovered that in repeated play-bouts, rats enjoy "rough and tumble" playing (just like human children, and dogs). Further, rather than stop after one round of playing and evidencing that larger rats dominate smaller rats, he studied specific pairs of rats over repeated play bouts (amongst other things). A larger rat will always show its physical prowess by dominating a smaller rat, in the first (and perhaps first few) play bouts, but these rats enjoy playing, and if a larger rat of the studied pair does not allow the smaller of the pair in a play bout to "win" at least 30% of the time, the smaller rat will not continue to play with the larger rat - it won't do that crouching type of invitation to play, that dogs and some humans also do when they want to play rough and tumble. So to get maximum play time (which these rats will hammer away on a button in order to obtain - they really do like playing rough and tumble with each other), larger rats must allow smaller rats to win at least 30% of the time, and, they generally do learn to do this. So the ethic here is not "winning a play bout" but how to "win the most across all play bouts, or, how to get more play time" which requires some level of treating your play partners (or "opponents") fairly. Thus, emergent ethics. Sam Harris and "scientific" "pure existentialists" who wish to base their ethics purely on facts (and not on religious hogwash or "air") would, I imagine, be lapping this up. Pretty cool stuff. And Jordan Peterson has been bringing an awareness of Jaak Panksepp and his rat play bout studies, and the consequent theory of an emergent basis for ethics, to an audience of millions - Peterson presents Panksepp's work in a compelling, comprehendable, (evidently) accessible, and enjoyable way. It is easy to appreciate and be grateful for this fact. So, how's that for a starter - tasty and accessible enough?

1 0