March 2018 - cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

Re: monkeys from the dark ages
by Cecilia Tanaka 07 Apr '18

07 Apr '18

Juan, please, did you really send the pretty aggressive message below? Usually, you would never attach stupid non sense pics, and "monkeys from the dark ages" doesn't seem the kind of expression that you would use to offend "feminazis" or any kind of people... Sounded out of tone, strange. :-/ It was a heavy and aggressive provocation mentioning "the West". Not your style. Sorry, it remembers me a lot when that stupid loser was faking messages of some members of this list... :P ---------- "Don't let anyone rob you of your imagination, your creativity, or your curiosity. It's your place in the world; it's your life. Go on and do all you can with it, and make it the life you want to live." - Mae Jemison On Feb 16, 2018 22:32, "juan" <juan.g71(a)gmail.com> wrote: I'm of course referring to the feminists. The 'progressives' are nothing but recycled puritan monkeys with exactly the same lunatic anti sex views. The feminists are just recycled, witch-burning joo-kkkristians. Funnily enough there is a sizable number of fake libertarian scum who are also feminists. Then again americunt 'libertarians' are just fascists with a thin veneer of libertarian rhetoric so it's hardly surprising. So libertarians are apologist of google, goldmand sachs and feminazis! Cool!. Oh, it's also worth looking into the 'progressives' involvenment in eugenics, and the voting record of the 'democratic party' regarding slavery haha. last but not least, the same western 'progressives' who stridently whine about 'womenyzzx' fictional oppression in the west are the same supreme scum who blow up women and children in the midle east for fun and profit. Like obomba and the swedish scum who gave obomba the 'nobel peace prize' (...)

7 17

[MONEY] - it's on folks, China gonna trade Yuan/Oil futures, "fully convertible" to physical gold
by Zenaan Harkness 02 Apr '18

02 Apr '18

No wonder the 'Merrycans are hopping nutcases bent on destroying a century of international law and anything remotely resembling diplomacy :) Seems Trump has delayed the onset of war, and if China gets going in the nick of time, the USA will be unequivocally seen for the absolute firetrucking bullies they are if they do start WW3! Good luck world, http://russia-insider.com/en/politics/game-changer-china-buy-oil-gold-backe… http://russia-insider.com/en/politics/smoke-pours-russian-consulate-secrets… Panic sets in for the Israelis: The Reason For Netanyahu's Panicked Flight to Russia http://russia-insider.com/en/politics/reason-netanyahus-panicked-flight-rus… "Israel has understood that it backed the wrong side in Syria – and it has lost."

1 1

[POLITICS] [CULTURAL ETHNIC WAR] The Jewish War On White Australia Continues
by Zenaan Harkness 01 Apr '18

01 Apr '18

Different people want different things. The sequence for Australia is roughly this: - Pacific Islander "original" Australians, talls and pygmies - Southern Indian invasion, genocide of the pacific islander talls and pygmies - this leaves Australia's modern "aboriginals" - Chinese visitations, but no settling - British "invasion", Captain Cook, doctrine of Terra Nullius, broad genocide of indian-descent "aboriginals" - White Australia policy - Jewish ethno-political activism successfully resulting in removal of White Australia laws and policy, and ongoing multicultural policy since 1973 So White Aussies had a largely homogeneous land called Australia, which they usurped from the previously dominant peoples. This is well on the way to being no longer the case. Whether this is good or bad is in the eye of the beholder - presumably this is a much gooderer situation for the chosenites, since they are now nothing like "the odd ones out" - what with many Asians (particularly south east Asians) and immigrants from the Middle East and Africa, we have genuine gang problems all over the map, not the least of which are Lebanese gangs in Sydney and Somali gangs in Melbourne - quite a bit of turmoil in fact, keeping the focus of the White Euro-goys on all the gang violence, rapes, pedestrian enrichment-by-car mowing, etc, etc. Suggested policies: - deport any and every migrant who is convicted of any violent crime - stop immigration from those places where we are bombing brown children - oh, and stop bombing brown children in foreign lands where we have absolutely no right or authority (other than thuggery) to be there Without this, the West (including Australia) shall continue to disintegrate, eating itself up so to speak, making us very easy to control since we are so focussed on negativity, rapes, murders and the rest, whilst the bankers sail on through it all, in-debt-ening the nation to ever more trillions of dollars. Oh, and the money problem (massive fiat debt) is easy to solve - it just requires a consciousness and a will of enough folks with a voice, to so fix, even avoiding a JFK-type assination "fix" by the bankers at issue… Good luck, To: Zenaan Harkness <zen(a)freedbms.net> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 18:01:55 +1000 Subject: The Jewish War On White Australia Continues Thought this may be of interest to read and to want to pass on. Ross Manley writes, ''In my extended essay ‘The War on White Australia,’ I explored how Jewish intellectual movements and ethno-political activism were pivotal in ending the White Australia policy — a policy change opposed by the vast majority of the Australian population. Australian Jews take enormous pride in this achievement. For instance, the national editor of the Australian Jewish News, Dan Goldberg proudly acknowledges that: “In addition to their activism on Aboriginal issues, Jews were instrumental in leading the crusade against the White Australia policy, a series of laws from 1901 to 1973 that restricted non-White immigration to Australia.” The Jewish promotion of non-White immigration and multiculturalism in Australia has been (and continues to be) a form of ethnic warfare aimed at destroying Australia’s traditional White racial homogeneity — and with it supposedly any potential for a mass movement of anti-Semitism in Australia.'' http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2014/01/28/the-jewish-war-on-white-aus…

2 1

Where to from the Founding Fathers? USA 1929: Jewish children immigration (Wagner-Rogers bill) overwhelmingly denied; 1940: British children immigration (bill) quickly approved
by Zenaan Harkness 01 Apr '18

01 Apr '18

Phase 1: Overton window resoundingly expanded - why =thank= you CNN, we basement dwelling deplorables may now speak out about Jewish power and control (banking, systems of blackmail compromat, hypocritical double standards on immigration, etc) in the West: In summary, it's open season on the JQ. (Hell, why shouldn't we freely talk about those people, systems and dynamics which affect us directly? Phase 2: Uphold the intentions of the American Founding Fathers Crunch time folks - the neo-marxist left are overrunning the house, bifurcationing is well underway - can a result acceptable to the majority of the "backbone of America" be achieved, or will strife descend? Good luck, and create your world‼ The following is somewhat lengthy (as blog pages go), a polemic if you will, but succinctly covers substantial ground, both past, present and possible futures. Brief snippet quoted: America's Founding Fathers reincarnated https://dailystormer.name/white-racialism-and-american-nationalism-pt-1/ … Spiro: Johnson read aloud to the House fresh consular cables provided by the State Department, warning that the majority of European Jews embarking for the United States were “subnormal,” “twisted,” “deteriorated,” and full of “perverted ideas. . . . These are not those who hewed the forests, . . . conquered the wastes, and built America. These are beaten folk” who, “besides being as a class economic parasites, . . . are impregnated with Bolshevism.” In short, according to the U.S. State Department, “this type of immigrant is not desirable from any point of view at this time.” The 1924 Immigration quotas held even as Jews were being increasingly persecuted under Hitler. In 1939, even following Kristallnacht, only 8% of Americans polled said they wanted to accept more Jewish refugees. That same year, the final attempt to increase the quota – the Wagner-Rogers bill, which called for refuge for Jewish children specifically – was soundly defeated. “One year later,” writes Spiro, “a similar bill to admit British children was introduced into the U.S. Congress. It was quickly approved.” In fact, no Western nation would accept an increase in Jews. In 1938, representatives from 32 countries organized the Évian Conference to decide what to do about the ones then living under Nazi rule. The one Jewish representative who was invited to the conference, Golda Meir, wasn’t even allowed to speak. The only two countries in attendance that were willing to take in Jewish refugees were non-white – the Dominican Republic and Costa Rica. Jews who were liberated from concentration camps following the war, far from being given refuge en masse, were instead put into displaced persons camps, where they had to stay for indefinite periods of time until they could be repatriated to their countries of origin. As many Jews feared persecution in those countries, they were forced to continue their underground network to Palestine (which was illegal at the time, as the British had barred their further immigration). …

1 1

Flaws in AMD CPUs.
by jim bell 30 Mar '18

30 Mar '18

Security researchers find flaws in AMD chips but raise eyebrows with rushed disclosure Business Security researchers find flaws in AMD chips but raise eyebrows with rushed disclosure Devin Coldewey,TechCrunch 19 hours ago A newly discovered set of vulnerabilities in AMD chips is making waves not because of the scale of the flaws, but rather the rushed, market-ready way in which they were disclosed by the researchers. When was the last time a bug had its own professionally shot video and PR rep, yet the company affected was only alerted 24 hours ahead of time? The flaws may be real, but the precedent set here is an unsavory one. The flaws in question were discovered by CTS Labs, a cybersecurity research outfit in Israel, and given a set of catchy names: Ryzenfall, Masterkey, Fallout, and Chimera, with associated logos, a dedicated website, and a whitepaper describing them. So far, so normal: major bugs like Heartbleed and of course Meltdown and Spectre got names and logos too. The difference is that in those cases the affected parties, such as Intel, the OpenSSL team, and AMD were quietly alerted well ahead of time. This is the concept of "responsible disclosure," and gives developers first crack at fixing an issue before it becomes public. There's legitimate debate over just how much control big companies should exert over the publicity of their own shortcomings, but generally speaking in the interest of protecting users the convention tends to be adhered to. In this case, however, the CTS Labs team sprang their flaws on AMD fully formed and with little warning. The flaws discovered by the team are real, though they require administrative privileges to execute a cascade of actions, meaning taking advantage of them requires considerable access to the target system. The research describes some as backdoors deliberately included in the chips by Taiwanese company ASmedia, which partners with many manufacturers to produce components. The access requirement makes these much more limited than the likes of Meltdown and Spectre, which exploited problems at the memory handling and architecture level. They're certainly serious, but the manner in which they have been publicized has aroused suspicion around the web. Why the extremely non-technical video shot on green screen with stock backgrounds composited in? Why the scare tactics of calling out AMD's use in the military? Why don't the bugs have CVE numbers, the standard tracking method for nearly all serious issues? Why was AMD given so little time to respond? Why not, if as the FAQ suggests, some fixes could be created in a matter of months, at least delay the publication until they were available? And what's with the disclosure that CTS "may have, either directly or indirectly, an economic interest in the performance" of AMD? That's not a common disclosure in situations like this. (I've contacted the PR representative listed for the flaws (!) for answers to some of these questions.) It's hard to shake the idea that there's some kind of grudge against AMD at play. That doesn't make the flaws any less serious, but it does leave a bad taste in the mouth. AMD issued a statement saying that "We are investigating this report, which we just received, to understand the methodology and merit of the findings." Hard to do much else in a day. As always with these big bugs, the true extent of their reach, how serious they really are, whether users or businesses will be affected, and what they can do to prevent it are all information yet to come as experts pore over and verify the data. * This article originally appeared on TechCrunch. ×

8 17

the origins of Politically Correct euphemisms - and on using the word "Jew"
by Zenaan Harkness 30 Mar '18

30 Mar '18

Well, well, well. So the Jews invented PC-speech - political correct speech, or to use their Rabbinical tradition, the building of fences around fences around prohibitions, to make damn sure that no one breaks the original statute (Rabbinical prohibition) That is, they gotta plug the holes in that fence, or eventually the next inner fence might have someone climbing over it or breaking through it (unintentionally of course, since the "chosen ones" are so holy and pure <caugh caugh>) and ultimately then break the original Jewish, Toranic, or Rabbinical prohibition statute - because Jewish law is the only thing in the world with any value, of course <ahem!>. ("Chosen ones?" - don't worry, their contract is now broken and the world is about to shift.) For example: - pronouncing the original name of God - YHWH or Yahweh - only permitted by the most high Rabbi in the rebuilt temple - which hasn't happened for a couple thousand years, so The Name (of God) is used instead ever since, and since The Name became such a connotation of the holy one, many euphemisms, or fences, and fences around fences (euphemisms to refer to previous euphemisms) have been created over the millenia to refer to The Name Why? Because even you dare to utter "The Name" in a reference to God, you might be tempted to actually speak "Yahweh" and thus, by you lowly evil sin, defile the name of God - I guess they can't say that you'd defile God, since God/YHWH is of course omnipotent and perfect and therefore can never be defiled, but logic never seemed to be the strongest attribute of the power-wielding "elite" in society. This game is of course an endless and unstoppable cycle for Jews - putting themselves lower and lower into the dirt and away from Godliness (only such original sinners could be so lowly as to not even be permitted to refer to some euphemism which referred to some euphemism (ad infinitum) which eventually lead back to a reference to the name of God). Although one should probably presume that -some- Jews do this ridiculous linguistic self deprecation dance in "true piousness", I dare say there are some fundamentally egotistical "I'm so holy I don't even use the euphemism of the euphemism of the ... of the reference to The Name (of God)" twats - and effectively indulge their human idiocy (sins) without realizing it and thereby live the presumption of incredibly low and evil self ungodliness and thereby ultimately be an incompetent who excuses evil and proclaims the moral relativism of every possible action. Hell, I should know - I'm so humble even the Dalai Llama attends an hour of my personal humility class when he's feeling a little egotistical. Anyway, so Jesus came along, threw the globalists, sorry, I mean European style socialists - ok, I mean Jewish money changer bankers - out of the temple, dispensed with the 613 (or 620) Jewish Rabbinical laws and (re)instituted the Golden Rule (do unto others as you would have them do unto you, or Love thy Neighbour, as Levicitus would lead us). BUT, that's a problem for Jews, since Jesus threw out the statute (Rabbinical) law - "go first within, for therein is the kingdom of heaven". Or in modern terms, find your own authority within yourself already. Is there any wonder this rebel was strung up on a cross and blead to death? He rocked the establishment and bypassed the hierarchy, washed a woman's feet and preached (did anything) on the sabbath, so "shut it down" already! Create your world folks, ----- Forwarded message from Zenaan Harkness <zen(a)freedbms.net> ----- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 12:19:36 +1100 Subject: using the J word Hi guys, this is an article by a Jewish author, who encourages us to avoid using euphemisms for "Jew", since using euphemisms in this case demonstrates fear of using the word "Jew". https://russia-insider.com/en/lets-call-jews-jews-and-not-use-silly-euphemi… Let's Call Jews 'Jews', and Not Use Silly Euphemisms Like 'Globalist' ----- End forwarded message -----

1 0