December 2018 - cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

Tim May Hosts Cypherpunks Party September 2002
by John Young 16 Dec '18

16 Dec '18

https://cryptome.org/cypherpunks10.htm 6 September 2002 ---------- Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 09:54:03 -0700 Subject: Announcement: Cypherpunks meeting/party/BBQ, Tim May's house To: cypherpunks(a)lne.com From: Tim May <tcmay(a)got.net> ANNOUNCEMENT: Cypherpunks Meeting and Party/BBQ, Saturday, September 14th, 2002. Tim May's house, Corralitos, California. * WHAT?: Ten years ago this month the first Cypherpunks meeting. Cypherpunks meeting and party. Several interesting talks are planned, though nothing of the usual "political action" sort. A flexible agenda will be posted at the meeting. I am hoping we can have as stimulating a discussion as we had at our first meetings a decade ago. * WHEN?: Saturday, September 14th, 1 p.m. to "late." (A limited amount of people can stay overnight--ask me about it.) Formal talks will probably run for several hours, then the informal and BBQ/party takes over. People can arrive as early as 1 p.m. and hang out, but the formal agenda will start promptly at 2. * WHERE?: Tim May's house in Corralitos, east of Santa Cruz and north of Watsonville. 427 Allan Lane, Corralitos. Detailed driving instructions at the end of this message...or use one of the many mappers on the Net. It takes about an hour to get from Sunnyvale to my house, about 40 miles, so plan your travel accordingly. * WHO?: Cypherpunks and friends who are not narcs or Feds. Contrary to some meetings in the past, this is NOT an "open meeting, open to all." That strategy worked OK for some meetings in public places where certain kinds of software were to be distributed. But my house is a private residence. I have nothing against legitimate cops enforcing legitimate laws, but I don't want persecutors traipsing through my house, perhaps planting evidence, looking for signs of illegal activities or grounds for a warrant, etc. This is a PRIVATE RESIDENCE and I intend to escort to the door anyone who is unknown to others. If you are a lurker who doesn't know anybody and you want to attend, send me e-mail and we'll arrange something. * WHAT ELSE?: Parking may be tight. And because of the distance, carpooling with your friends would be good. A cat lives in the house...don't leave any doors open, and tell me if you see him get out. * CHILDREN?: My house is not child-friendly, and I don't have time to make sure nothing dangerous is exposed. Please leave children out of this meeting/party. * FOOD: If you stay for the evening BBQ and party, bring something to share. Don't everyone bring a bag of chips! The Corralitos Market is a popular place for meats, sausages, etc. (Don't everyone bring sausages, either!) And if you drink, remember the drive home. --Tim May (location instructions below) Getting to Tim May's house in Corralitos: 427 Allan Lane (MapQuest works well). 831-728-0152 From Santa Cruz, south on Highway 1. Take Freedom Boulevard exit in Aptos. Go inland, on Freedom Blvd. Travel about 5 miles, to first stop sign. Take a left on Corralitos Road. At the the next stop sign, the Corralitos Market (good sausages!) will be on your left. Just before the stop sign, bear right on Brown's Valley Road. Cross bridge and then bear left as Brown's Valley Road turns. Travel about one mile to Allan Lane, on the right. Allan Lane is at about the "360" mailbox point on Brown's Valley Road...if you go too far and enter the redwoods, turn back! Drive to top of hill on Allan Lane. At top, bear left, over a small rise, past a house on the left, then down my driveway. My house will be the white stucco semi-Spanish style, with a red Explorer and black Mercedes in the driveway. Note for parties: You can park either in my driveway or at the top of the hill and walk a few hundred feet. Don't block any driveways! From points south of Santa Cruz, take Green Valley Road exit off of Highway 1. Travel about 2 miles to Freedom Boulevard. Turn left. Then right at Corralitos Road. ------- Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 17:50:33 -0400 To: cypherpunks(a)lne.com From: "R. A. Hettinga" <rah(a)shipwright.com> Subject: seeking information for Wired News article --- begin forwarded text From: "Danit Lidor" <dlidor(a)wired.com> To: <rah(a)shipwright.com> Subject: seeking information for Wired News article Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 13:19:21 -0700 Hi there, I am a reporter at Wired News. We received notice of the upcoming Cypherpunks 10th anniversary bash. I am thinking of writing a short article about the history and current status of the cypherpunk community. Obviously, things have changed a lot in the last 10 years. I imagine that you and other cypherpunks would have much to say on the topic. Please feel free to rant and rave to me about whatever you feel would be relevant to this kind of article. When did the Cypherpunks come into existence? Who were the founding members? What was the inital purpose? What kinds of people are involved? Who (socially, I mean, not names!) exactly are the members of the group? How many at any one time? Is it a rotating membership, with people coming and going? There has been a substantial amount of press dedicated to the Cypherpunks, what's been the community response? Have their been internal discussions about the repercussions of the media's involvement and the like? Wired News had a very familiar relationship with the cypherpunks - has it been viewed as a positive thing? Have the ideals of the group changed over the years? Are there any manifestos or official statements from the group that I can access? What are the future plans for the cypherpunks? I attempted to access cypherpunks.com but most of the links are dead, why isn't anyone maintaining it? Or is it unrelated to the current community? With whom else are the cypherpunks allied? What do you, personally, have to say about the future of the Internet, privacy, legislation, hacking, phreaking, cyber terrorism, the governement. etc? And finally, who else should I be talking to? Thanks for your time. I am hoping to get the story done before the end of next week (i.e., before the actual party.) Of course, I would never publish the location of the party or any other information that you don't feel comfortable about. Danit Lidor I am also available at 415.276.3925. Please leave me a message if I'm away from my desk. I am more than happy to call you back. --- end forwarded text

1 0

Quantum Gap
by jim bell 14 Dec '18

14 Dec '18

"Gentlemen, we must not allow a mine-shaft gap!!!" Dr Strangelove, movie, 1964. U.S. intelligence sounds the alarm on the quantum gap with China https://news.yahoo.com/u-s-intelligence-sounds-alarm-quantum-gap-china-1000…

3 9

A valid investigation is when
by Ryan Carboni 14 Dec '18

14 Dec '18

1. The investigators can’t admit they are being told to buzz off. 2. Because it is so secret that the whole village knows about it and is participating in the conspiracy. 3. That after divine intervention their attitude is “it got real” Ten years eh? Anyway, the US government burnt a few exploits on me, but I just... disconnected the ethernet cable? So they decide to hack me through my Logitech unifying receiver? Well, the government will claim this is BS, but then I’m just saying... the US government knew. And does nothing. They need some real oversight. “Well, you see, we don’t have to respond to this, or react in anyway, or flinch, because we’re only accountable to the American people, and they don’t know anything.” It shall be through the power of God that the CNN feed shall cut out on Sunday.

2 1

Ron Unz: 10:1 Ivy League bias, Jew:Gentile - anti-White discrimination
by Zenaan Harkness 13 Dec '18

13 Dec '18

The following links are different articles, the former quotes the latter. Ron Unz gets to the heart of things, that's for sure - humorous if it weren't so depressing. Jews Fraudulently Favored in Ivy League by 10:1 vs. Whites - Ron Unz's Shocking Expose https://russia-insider.com/en/jews-fraudulently-favored-ivy-league-101-vs-w… The UNZ essay is very long with its 26,000 words, too long for average reader, so here are its salient points: - Jews organized a clannish network to get themselves into best universities in numbers well beyond their share in population, and (!!!) well beyond their abilities; - their fight against discrimination of Blacks has being carried at the expense of America’s white Christians. If previously discriminated minorities, be it Afro-Americans or whatever, enjoy the fruits of affirmative action (positive discrimination), it is no loss for Jews, as only Gentiles, once privileged WASPs are being screwed up. - if once upon a time Jews had got into best colleges because they were smart, smarter than Gentile kids, now they are noticeably less smart, but they get there anyway because they are Jews. The numbers distilled by Ron Unz out of dusty spread sheets are terrifying. You can look at the diagram he compiled, or immerse yourself in the ocean of data he provides, to get convinced: the discrimination is very real. Unz quotes a Jewish writer who exhilarates that “the WASP demographic group which had once so completely dominated America’s elite universities and virtually all the major institutions of American life had by 2000 become a small and beleaguered minority at Harvard, being actually fewer in number than the Jews whose presence they had once sought to restrict.” … Unz is very meticulous, very cautious in his approach. He asks an almost-insulting question: perhaps the Jews are so smart (after all, that is the kin of Einstein and Freud) that their share in the Ivy League is a result of meritocratic selection? And he provides an almost-insulting answer: no, they aren’t. There are some universities that admit strictly by merit; in these universities Jews do not exactly star. Caltech, the California Institute of Technology is one of them. The Jewish presence there is quite small; Hillel, the Jewish students’ body, gives it as zero. In reality, it is about 6 per cent, like in other merit-based competitions. It can’t be zero, for sure. In 2003, two Palestine Solidarity activists, Adam Shapiro and Huwaida Arraf, had been booed there by pro-Israeli Jews who tried their beastly best to drive away the speakers. But there are not many Jews. There are few Jewish Olympiad winners; once they were in dozens, now there are hardly any. Altogether Jewish kids make up some six per cent of NMS, the highest-performing students’ list. This is a good result, in line with Jewish admissions into meritocratic colleges, but it is four times less than what you would expect judging by their Yale admissions. The Jewish IQ, as Unz found out, is also in line with that of their Gentile peers, and not the fabulous 110-115, as the Jewish newspapers claim. Jews are not all that smart anymore, judging by their score. … In his consequent article on the subject, Unz discovered that after publication of his article, the numbers of Jewish admissions in the best colleges had been sharply readjusted downwards. What was 25% (Jews in Harvard) became 12%. But do not rejoice before time. The Jews responded with subterfuge instead of correcting action. Now they refer in their statistics only to Jews who state that they are followers of Jewish faith; and this is a dwindling lot. If one counts the students who refer to themselves as “descendants of Holocaust survivors” and speak of “my true home Israel”, we are back to 25%. … http://www.unz.com/runz/the-myth-of-american-meritocracy/

1 0

Book: Two Hundred Years Together - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
by Zenaan Harkness 13 Dec '18

13 Dec '18

Two Hundred Years Together; Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn First English translation of censored chapters translated (no cost) https://twohundredyearstogether.wordpress.com/2017/01/25/chapter-2/ https://twohundredyearstogether.wordpress.com/2017/02/01/chapter-3/ https://twohundredyearstogether.wordpress.com/2017/02/08/chapter-6/ (Wednesday per week publishing expectation for additional chapters.) Translators note: Two Hundred Years Together is a long historical analysis on the history of Jews in Russia, written by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. There have been attempts to translate this work into English though we don't have accurate translations of the censored chapters still. Until now. If you're interested in this work, we're publishing translations of censored chapters starting with chapter two here: https://twohundredyearstogether.wordpress.com/2017/01/25/chapter-2 I would appreciate it if you shared this blog. We have completed several chapters, and will be releasing every Wednesday. The material is strangely relevant to current events today. On behalf of the translator and editor, David Davidson

2 3

How women bond in sex - oxytocin - On the re-establishment of child marriage
by Zenaan Harkness 13 Dec '18

13 Dec '18

So everybody's favourite Neon-Nazi Andrew Anglin, is calling for "reinstating child marriage". Read it first before shouting an ad-hom, as he's advocating a return (in this sense at least) to a bygone era of the West which is not so long ago, where the social mores, expectations and conversations created the possibility for marriages where husband and wife can actually bond with one another - in an emotional, bio/physiological way (notwithstanding "pick your religion"). https://dailystormer.name/self-help-sunday-being-an-alpha-male-and-or-a-rea… As most know, modern marriages (as well as "de facto" relationships) are not working, in the sense that divorce and separation is the dominant experience after (at best (for most)) a few short years. This is consistently leaving children with broken families, torn between one or another parent, usually left primarily with the mother only and too often used as a bargaining chip between the "failed" parents. There's plenty of stats on all this, and "happiness" and "success" in life for children from various families. Puberty is the traditional "generally accepted" minimum age for marriage in "Western Christian" history: Does the Bible say what is the proper age for marriage? https://www.gotquestions.org/marriage-age.html Question: "Does the Bible say what is the proper age for marriage?" Answer: The Bible does not specify any particular age requirement for a person to be married; rather, it speaks in general terms of marriage being for those who are “grown up” (see Ruth 1:12–13). Both the language and culture of the Bible strongly support the idea that puberty, at bare minimum, is a condition that must be met before becoming someone’s spouse. This fits with the historical purpose of marriage, which has always been about conceiving and rearing children. Scriptural evidence indicates that those too young for childbearing are not candidates for marriage, though there is no explicit age given in the Bible. It is reasonable to look at the practices of ancient Judaism for cultural considerations on the proper age for marriage. According to tradition, boys were not considered “men,” and therefore not marriageable, until the age of 13. Girls were not considered “women” until age 12. These ages more or less correspond to the onset of puberty. While those ages might seem too young to us, they are not unusual ages for getting married, historically. It has only been within the last century or so that the average age of getting married has drifted into the late twenties and early thirties. … The bottom line is that delaying adulthood, as we do today in the west, does not delay puberty - and the sexual drives that accompany puberty and which most all of us have experienced during our early years ... ... and in today's "promiscuous" "Western" society with immediate access to unlimited pornography and inexpensive and readily available contraception, the natural desire of young humans to experience sex is very easy to fulfil, and therefore ... ... therefore for women who "ride the cock carousel" for 12 or more years before "settling down" and "thinking about a family", there is no more real opportunity to bond (sexually) with a mate and therefore no possibility for stable family (for say 16 years "for the kids"): Damaged Women http://outcastsuperstar.blogspot.com/2013/10/damaged-women.html I live in America and something is terribly wrong with most of the women living here. Something about Westernized culture is destroying the most wonderful attributes of women and turning them into pseudo-men with worst qualities of female gender. Many other threads have touched on many of the manifest problems- self centered, self entitled, gold-digging, sociopathic- Was it the media? Yes, to an extent- it introduced them to insidious, damaging behavior and poor role-models- but that was not the impetus that made good girls go bad. The real culprit is never talked about. Women become truly broken/ damaged after they squander their VIRGINITY. It is apparently misogynistic to point out the difference between men and women, but here is a plain example of where men and women can never be equal. Women just are not equipped mentally or biologically to handle recreational sex in the same way that men do. The first time a women has sex, a chemical- oxytocin- is released in her brain that causes "pair bonding" to occur- its same chemical that is released when she is giving birth which causes mother to fall in love with baby. This is why first loves are always so intense. Women are admittedly- more emotional creatures, more sensitive to emotional pain- which is why when that first love ends, it is extremely devastating. After that first traumatic break up, a woman promises herself she will never allow herself to get that close to a man again, for fear that he may hurt her as badly as the first one did. Yet, every time she has sex with new men, that oxytocin will try to get her to bond with new man, but the women will now fight against that impulse- they don't want to bond, they want to f*ck. This causes a sort of sociopathic backlash to occur. After a series of men, it will become apparent that she can no longer bond significantly with ANYONE. The woman then becomes completely self serving- she doesn't trust that anyone will ever truly be there for her, so she has only herself to rely on, men are simply a resource to exploit, or a fun ride on cock carousel. Instead of finding meaning and pleasure in the joys of a close, intimate relationship, she seeks thrills of new sexual experiences... This only lasts so long. A woman's sexual capital is highest when she's young, and as she gets older, her options get less and less. She peaked early in life, and at the tender age of 30, she likely has another 50 years of it all being "downhill." In wiser societies, a huge amount of consideration was placed on a girl's virginity because they knew what would happen when a women's sexuality was left unleashed- it not only would cause ultimate ruin to the women, but the society at large, because a sexually deviant women is a social cancer, causing problems among both men and women. Women were placed in arranged marriages because- hell- let's face it, women are terrible at choosing their partners, as evidenced by 70% marriage failure rate of marriage. The traditional view of marriage held that a women would give her best years of her left to her husband, in return for him taking care of her when she got older. This is the original set up that held families together- a man was also invested not to leave the aging wife despite his steadily maturing sexual capital, as they had kids together and the kids would be very angry at that move. Women now want it that they get to slut it up first when they are young with all the the sexually exciting alpha bad boys, and then eventually settle down with a boring, economically viable beta. They refuse to see that at that point, there are broken beyond repair. Their sexual histories and memories do not go away after they are married, and those ghosts of the past will haunt her and ruin any stable relationship she could have had in the future. … Also: A Woman’s Body May Incorporate DNA From The Semen Of Casual Sex Partners https://www.rooshv.com/a-womans-body-may-incorporate-dna-from-the-semen-of-… 12 Years A Hottie http://www.returnofkings.com/131951/12-years-a-hottie … “Men do not have a sell-by date, but women do.” … “today, the price of pussy continues to be at all-time lows (if you avoid marriage)” … “In the foreseeable future we will continue to see economic decline, waning birth rates, rising divorce, men in poverty, increase in single moms, violent crime, married/single or middle-aged female teachers sleeping their students or teens, increase in suicides. This all will continue if our culture does not acknowledge human sexual dimorphism and the fact that men and women are different (not equal from a biological standpoint).” SO! Listen up, women! : a) Recreational sex and resultant genetic deposit into your brain. b) Oxytocin release. c) “Can no longer bond significantly with ANYONE.” That's the wrap! Some men (probably many, perhaps most) also want the experience of a woman who bonds to them, and that longer-term relationship which is considered by many (and science) to be very functional for the first 14 years at least for our children. So for females to marry young (say at or around puberty) is at least one historically effective mechanism to handle the problem of those who would "ride the cock carousel" and result in "broken" families. Females preserving their virginity - or rather, not shoving ANYTHING up there until you marry (to preserve that oxytocin bonding hit for your husband/ long term father of your children) - is another mechanism, although apparently almost impossible for young women to do in THIS day and age... Average Age of Marriage Throughout History https://study.com/academy/lesson/average-age-of-marriage-throughout-history… … The Medieval and Modern World One of the first times we see a major concern about the age difference between couples is in England in 1275 CE. In a law prohibiting rape, it was also declared illegal to 'ravish a maiden' within a certain age, with or without her permission. That age was determined by jurist Sir Edward Coke to mean the age of marriage, which at the time was 12. This still seems young, but it's one of the first times we see a strict age limit placed on marriage or sexual interaction. This was the beginning of our modern association between the age of marriage and age of consent. Good luck and create your world folks, our society and the future for our children depends on it.

3 4

BBC News: Word processor pioneer Evelyn Berezin dies aged 93
by jim bell 13 Dec '18

13 Dec '18

Word processor pioneer Evelyn Berezin dies aged 93 - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-46539934 The first word processor I used, in 1977, was called VEG, a variant of TECO. I used it to edit a source file of 8080 assembly language. This was assembled by the Microbench assembler. Jim Bell

1 0

WIRED: Quantum Computing Needs You to Help Solve Its Core Mystery
by jim bell 13 Dec '18

13 Dec '18

WIRED: Quantum Computing Needs You to Help Solve Its Core Mystery. https://www.wired.com/story/quantum-computing-needs-you-to-help-solve-its-c…

1 0

14 “Whites” arrested in Columbia - child sex trafficking ring busted - [PEACE]
by Zenaan Harkness 11 Dec '18

11 Dec '18

Few more o' these and we might say the swamp is being drained: https://www.timesofisrael.com/14-israelis-suspected-of-running-child-sex-tr… And of course your favourite neon write up: dailystormer.name/kikes-caught-red-handed-sex-slavery-ring-busted-by-white-supremacists-in-columbia/

2 1

Trump, Israel, and being compromised - [PEACE]
by Zenaan Harkness 11 Dec '18

11 Dec '18

So Trump has for 2 years been sucking up to the Israel lobby, and oh how William Krystol, Max Boot and Jennifer Rubin have turned and supported Trump as a result. Or something. USA Israel embassy to Jerusalem. $38 billion in grants. The most phenomenal military budget the world has ever seen, protecting Israel/Saudi interests in the M.E. Trump knows that no matter what he does, he will forever be "orange man bad" from hysterical hissing weasels such as Max Boot. So why continue the ruse of licking Jew Boot? Why indeed. Compromise - some sort of blackmail - is perhaps the order of the day. “Ivanka, I promise you I will never date anyone younger than you” comes to mind. Perhaps there's a compromising photo lying around - as in, around in the (((CIA's))) hands. Unending increasing support to The Lobby despite unending increasing opposition from said The Lobby, demonstrates doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different outcome - that is, madness by way of some compromise/blackmail. As has been said before, if we fail to handle the blackmail program, we shall continue to experience a mostly undermined, compromised i.e. owned "leadership". Good luck, Queasy Hebrew Gentleman Tries to Explain Love of Saudi Arabia to Sean Hannity https://dailystormer.name/queasy-hebrew-gentleman-tries-to-explain-love-of-…

1 0