December 2015 - cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

Linux Foundation announces project to "advance blockchain technology"
by Zenaan Harkness 20 Dec '15

20 Dec '15

With so many altcoin standards to choose from, just as well we shall shortly have another :) Zenaan ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "LWN.net Daily Summary" <lwn(a)lwn.net> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 04:00:19 +0000 (UTC) Subject: LWN.net Daily Summary for December 18, 2015 http://lwn.net/Articles/668359/ Linux Foundation announces project to "advance blockchain technology" [Announcements] Posted Dec 17, 2015 17:35 UTC (Thu) by jake The Linux Foundation has announced[1] a new collaborative project[2] to "develop an enterprise grade, open source distributed ledger framework" to allow developers to build "robust, industry-specific applications, platforms and hardware systems to support business transactions". Twenty companies have joined the effort: Accenture, ANZ Bank, Cisco, CLS, Credits, Deutsche Börse, Digital Asset Holdings, DTCC, Fujitsu Limited, IC3, IBM, Intel, J.P. Morgan, London Stock Exchange Group, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG), R3, State Street, SWIFT, VMware, and Wells Fargo. "Many of the founding members are already investing considerable research and development efforts exploring blockchain applications for industry. IBM intends to contribute tens of thousands of lines of its existing codebase and its corresponding intellectual property to this open source community. Digital Asset is contributing the Hyperledger mark, which will be used as the project name, as well as enterprise grade code and developer resources. R3 is contributing a new financial transaction architectural framework designed to specifically meet the requirements of its global bank members and other financial institutions. These technical contributions, among others from a variety of companies, will be reviewed in detail in the weeks ahead by the formation and Technical Steering Committees." [1] http://www.linuxfoundation.org/news-media/announcements/2015/12/linux-found… [2] https://blockchain.linuxfoundation.org/

3 2

Opponents launch 11th-hour campaign to veto CISA bill
by grarpamp 20 Dec '15

20 Dec '15

http://yro.slashdot.org/story/15/12/19/1415251/us-budget-bill-passes-with-c… https://twitter.com/aantonop/status/677933077276962816 https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3xg9v1/cisa_has_passed_post_your_… https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3xgvwk/cisa_passage_proves_need_f… https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3xdqme/andreasmantonopoulos_on_tw…

1 0

Re: [Cryptography] What should I put in notifications to NSA?
by grarpamp 20 Dec '15

20 Dec '15

On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill(a)hallambaker.com> wrote: > Math doesn't have a moral conscience. No one argues this, yet one must recognize there is a delay line involved following first implementors. > All that you can do is decide which > use cases you are going to address. If selling to governments for certain of their use cases and inherent reduction in delay is such decision. > There is far too much seditious talk in the US to start > with and it does not sound any different to me to the treason talk from > countries All depends on whether one views state, and maintainership of state, even given necessary change, as a higher cause than the people, or any other cause. Is not various necessary change throughout the world being unduly held up by state. Sell crypto to it for its purposes if you wish. You will surely make dollars and friends there for your purposes.

1 0

Assange believes too late for any pervasive privacy
by Zenaan Harkness 20 Dec '15

20 Dec '15

Feels like a sell out. I suspect he feels he's being pragmatic. https://www.rt.com/news/325524-assange-privacy-rt-10/ Game for privacy is gone, mass surveillance is here to stay – Assange on #RT10 panel Published time: 10 Dec, 2015 18:13 Edited time: 11 Dec, 2015 03:16 Humanity has lost its battle for privacy and must now learn to live in a world where mass surveillance is becoming cheaper for governments to implement, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said during a panel dedicated to RT’s 10th anniversary. Assange addressed the panel on security and surveillance hosted by RT in central Moscow on Thursday via videoconference from the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where he has remained holed up for the last three years in order to avoid extradition to Sweden. When offered a chance to comment on the session’s topic – “Security or Surveillance: Can the right to privacy and effective anti-terror security coexist in the digital age?” – the whistleblower asked the moderator, and host of The Big Picture Show on RT American, Thom Hartmann: “How long have you got, Tom?” implying he has a lot to say on the issue. But it was Assange’s only joke during the event, as his reply turned out to be gravely serious and in many respects depressing. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3rFNQ8ytnE “In thinking about this issue I want to take quite a different position, perhaps, from what you would expect me to have taken… I think that we should understand that the game for privacy is gone. It’s gone. The mass surveillance is here to stay,” he said. Mass surveillance is already being implemented not only by major world powers, but also by some medium and small-sized countries, he added. “The Five Eyes intelligence arrangement [of Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the UK and the US]… is so evasive in terms of mass surveillance of domestic and international telecommunications that while some experts can achieve practical privacy for themselves for limited number of operations… it’s gone for the rest of the populations,” the WikiLeaks founder stressed. International terrorists are among those “experts” capable of making their communications invisible for security agencies, he added. Privacy “will not be coming back, short of a very regressive economic collapse, which reduces the technological capacity of civilization,” Assange said. “The reason it will not come back is that the cost of engaging in mass surveillance is decreasing by about 50 per cent every 18 months, because it’s the underlying cost that’s predicated on the cost of telecommunications, moving surveillance intercepts around and computerization and storage – all those costs are decreasing much faster at a geometric rate than the human population is increasing,” he explained. Mass surveillance and computerization are “winning” the competition with humanity and human values and they’re “going to continue to win at an ever-increasing rate. That’s the reality that we have to deal with,” the WikiLeaks whistleblower added. The focus should now switch from defending privacy to understanding what kind of society will be built in these new, changed conditions, he said. The WikiLeaks founder reminded the panel of the historic examples of East Germany and other societies, in which people adapted to living under the scrutiny of the authorities. “If you look at societal behavior in very conformist, small, isolated societies with reduced social spaces – like Sweden, South Korea, Okinawa in Japan and North Korea – then you’ll see that society adapts. Everyone becomes incredibly timid, they start to use code words; use a lot of subtext to try and sneak out your controversial views,” he said. According to Assange, the modern world is currently moving “towards that kind of a society.” Privacy is among values “that simply are unsustainable… in the face of the reality of technological change; the reality of the deep state with a military-industrial complex and the reality of Islamic terrorism, which is legitimizing that sector in a way that it’s behaving,” he stressed. Assange encouraged those present on the panel as well as the general public to “get on the other side of the debate where it’s going” and stop holding on to privacy. The panel discussion was part of an RT conference titled 'Information, messages, politics:The shape-shifting powers of today's world.' The meeting brought together politicians, foreign policy experts and media executives from across the globe, among them former director of the US Defense Intelligence Agency Michael Flynn, the Green Party’s Jill Stein and former vice president of the Parliamentary Assembly of the OSCE, Willy Wimmer.

7 17

Fwd: [Cryptography] What should I put in notifications to NSA?
by grarpamp 19 Dec '15

19 Dec '15

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Bill Cox <waywardgeek(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I don't think requiring registration of open-source crypto violates our > constitutional rights, but I know this is debatable. I'd just comply with > the law and send a simple email. It's unconstitutional in the same way gun laws and surveillance laws and etc laws are. But let's all keep on happily and quietly complying so they can give us more unconstitutional laws and silly paper violations to comply with. Kudos. (Also of note is the difference between laws that compel you to act, punish you for not acting, or punish you for acting in offensive manner such as against persons or property The former two being curiosities.)

1 0

Re: [Cryptography] What should I put in notifications to NSA?
by grarpamp 19 Dec '15

19 Dec '15

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill(a)hallambaker.com> wrote: >> Seriously?! >> >> How about linking to... >> http://fuckoff.com/ >> >> And if you're still worried, >> develop stuff anonymously, >> in/over anonymous networks. >> >> And if they still care to bother to find you, >> then your country's obviously shit and >> you need a new one. > > > I'm not the type of crypto hacker that develops a strong encryption scheme > just to disable NSA mass surveillance. > > I'm trying to be the type of crypto hacker that develops a strong encryption > scheme to disable NSA mass surveillance and then sells the same scheme to > the NSA to secure all those documents that Snowden and Manning leaked. If you want to support / enable your government in that fashion and purpose, that's your choice. Maybe after thinking more on all the questionable things it is doing under secrecy, you and others might make a different choice.

1 0

Re: The USA Fake Of The Moon Landings
by Razer 19 Dec '15

19 Dec '15

juan: > On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 18:38:52 +0000 > Razer <razer(a)riseup.net> wrote: > >> Don't cherrypick my writings dick. > > I didn't cherrypick anything. I merely highlighted what you > said. Feel free to call people who challenge any official story > nutjobs, but don't expect much sympathy from me... This is 'highhlighting'... Notice the rest of what you said below... > > > ps: your message came from razer@riseup, not rayzer@riseup. I replied > (automatically) to razer@ and the reply bounced... > > 550 5.1.1 <razer(a)riseup.net>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown > Now here's the rest of what I said: > One of the things my dad bequeathed me was an Omega "Moon Watch"... at > least that's the way Omega advertised them. What was unique about the > one I had vs the advertised store variety was the fact that it was an > old fashioned wind-up, as opposed to the retail version, a self-winder. > > Why the difference? As my dad put it "We didn't know if a self-winder > would work in zero-gravity", and they weren't willing to take the risk. > > If the moon landing was a hoax, it was such an intricate one it would > have cost more to execute then actually landing someone on the moon. -- RR "You might want to ask an expert about that - I just fiddled around with mine until it worked..."

5 8

Re: [Cryptography] What should I put in notifications to NSA?
by grarpamp 18 Dec '15

18 Dec '15

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:29 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill(a)hallambaker.com> wrote: > I am working on staging the code for the Mesh on SourceForge. > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/mathematicalmesh/ > > There is this bit to do: > > You must notify BIS and the ENC Encryption Request Coordinator via > e-mail of the Internet location (e.g., URL or Internet address) of the > publicly available encryption source code or provide each of them a > copy of the publicly available encryption source code. If you update > or modify the source code, you must also provide additional copies to > each of them each time the cryptographic functionality of the source > code is updated or modified. In addition, if you posted the source > code on the Internet, you must notify BIS and the ENC Encryption > Request Coordinator each time the Internet location is changed, but > you are not required to notify them of updates or modifications made > to the encryption source code at the previously notified location. In > all instances, submit the notification or copy to crypt(a)bis.doc.gov > and toenc(a)nsa.gov. > > > What do folk normally do here? I was thinking of giving them the URL > of the repository and a statement to the effect that by complying I do > not wave my first amendment rights Seriously?! How about linking to... http://fuckoff.com/ And if you're still worried, develop stuff anonymously, in/over anonymous networks. And if they still care to bother to find you, then your country's obviously shit and you need a new one. cc cpunks due to metzdowd thought police

2 1

America's Top Next Law: Go To Prison... For Reading... WTF?
by grarpamp 17 Dec '15

17 Dec '15

http://tech.slashdot.org/story/15/12/16/130218/go-to-jail-for-visiting-a-we… Eric Posner, the fourth most-cited law professor in the U.S., says the government may need to jail you if you even visit an ISIS site after enough warnings. He says, "Never before in our history have enemies outside the United States been able to propagate genuinely dangerous ideas on American territory in such an effective way—and by this I mean ideas that lead directly to terrorist attacks that kill people. The novelty of this threat calls for new thinking about limits on freedom of speech. The law would provide graduated penalties. After the first violation, a person would receive a warning letter from the government; subsequent violations would result in fines or prison sentences. The idea would be to get out the word that looking at ISIS-related websites, like looking at websites that display child pornography, is strictly forbidden" There would be exemptions for Washington-blessed journalists and others. Whew! Alas, this man isn't Donald Trump — he is a widely respected University of Chicago faculty member writing in Slate. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/view_from_chicago/2015/12/i… http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/go-to-jail-for-visiting-a-web-site-or-maybe-… Of course crypto will be labeled a dangerous idea... Can't publish it, can't have it, can't use it, can't read it, can't think it.

3 2

Re: [Cryptography] Satoshi's PGP key.
by grarpamp 17 Dec '15

17 Dec '15

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Henry Baker <hbaker1(a)pipeline.com> wrote: > Is there any chance that Satoshi works/worked for the > NSA or equivalent? > > For a huge number of reasons, s/he couldn't publish > under her/his own name, but may have gotten permission > to do this project anyway, so long as s/he didn't make > any personal profit on it. > > I can imagine that the NSA & GCHQ are still hurting > at not getting proper credit for developing "public > key" encryption, and they may not have wanted to see > a long string of bad versions of bitcoins foisted > upon the world when they already had a pretty good > solution. The NSA has proven to not be above doing things that it can exploit / track / manage.

1 0